Greg Stein wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
[snip]
... I think there is going to be some concern that
we're forcing/rushing the process, but I believe the speed is simply
a function of the awesome match in ideals.
Agreed.
Perhaps this Vote phase should run for a while.
(I am thinking about
Matthieu Riou wrote:
The ODE PMC has accepted (see vote [1]) the incubation proposal for HIVE
[2]. The mentors are Paul, Glen and yours truly.
It is a typo. They mean HISE (see [2]). I altered the email Subject.
After the 72 hours wait period ending May 5th I'll go ahead and create the
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 12:50:59PM +, David Crossley (JIRA) wrote:
Incubator wiki edits now missing
Key: INFRA-2298
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2298
Project: Infrastructure
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
My changes were very simple, and easy to do again, but I guess you are
looking for the cause that this happened...
Did you see Joe's subsequent reply today ...
tell niclas not to use the GUI editor.
-David
Jukka Zitting wrote:
George Aroush wrote:
Anyone?!
Sorry for the silence.
What you need to do in practice is pretty much listed in [1]. See [2]
for an example of how Tika requested the mailing list migration.
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#project-first-steps
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Is Buildr an Incubating project, or has been?? Not seen on
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html nor the Reporting
Schedule, but shows up in Jira under the Incubator category.
Guessing the URL, gives:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/buildr.html
During
Rafal Rusin wrote:
Rafal Rusin rafal.ru...@gmail.com:
Thanks for pointing it out.
I'll rename it to HISE to avoid confusion. It will stand for Human
Interactions Service Engine.
I updated wiki here's link: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HISEProposal
When you think that the proposal
Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
OpenWebBeans is an ASL-licensed implementation of the JSR-299:
Contexts and Dependency Injection for the Java EE platform which is
defined as JSR-299. OpenWebBeans entered the incubator in October 26, 2008.
(This issue is not a release blocker.)
The phrase
Janne Jalkanen wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Janne Jalkanen wrote:
Yes, we're keeping our task list in JIRA instead of the web page,
simply because it's a lot easier, and encourages participation more
than a static HTML file somewhere.
I know. However, that page is what the incubation
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Joe Schaefer wrote:
AIUI, and the way httpd does it, the LICENSE file contains all the licenses
in
the distribution, preferably in an annotated fashion so you know which
license
goes with which component. ?The NOTICE file is for any additional required
Joe, as far as i know, just dive in and make changes to
most Incubator documents.
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html
For the main policy document, there is a note at
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Changing+this+Document
We usually pass such changes
Leo Simons wrote:
Greg Brown wrote:
If I can attempt to summarize, there is a difference between the *concept*
of a leader and the *title* of a leader here at ASF (please correct me if I
am wrong).
Correct! You missed the rationale in the summary, though :-)
* There is a goal that
On Jun 25 2009 David Crossley wrote:
Would all projects please ensure that your mentor lists
are up-to-date. We all need to be able to easily remind
ourselves.
The primary location is the Currently in incubation table:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/
Here are some notes about how
This is a general comment to everyone. It is finally triggered
by this month's report from Pivot.
There is no such concept at the ASF as leading developer.
Yes i know that the Jira issue tracker is misleading, as it has
an incorrect label on its interface: Project Lead
David Crossley wrote:
Would the projects Wink, Traffic Server, VXQuery
please add themselves to the main Currently in incubation table:
Fantastic. Thanks to you all. Especially nice that it
was project developers doing such tasks rather than mentors.
Thanks again.
-David
Gee, i hope that more people will assist with this offer
to review your project status. That was supposed to be
your week to have some special attention.
More below ...
Janne Jalkanen wrote:
The podling Status page hasn't been updated in ages.
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/jspwiki.html
Craig L Russell wrote:
Janne:
*grin*
I completely missed this email the first time around. I think
JSPWiki would certainly benefit from the attention ...
Fantastic. I am so glad that i restarted Bill's thread.
close to having all the bits and pieces in place (minus a release or
Would the projects Wink, Traffic Server, VXQuery
please add themselves to the main Currently in incubation table:
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/
See how to notes via links from the Steps section at
[2] http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html#h-Sponsor
That table [1] and the Wiki
On Nov 21, 2008 William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I'd like to suggest a thread on general@ for each of those projects
who believe they are close to graduation, but not sure what to do
next. To kick off such a thread, email *me* with a summary (like
you do for status reports) of where your project
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
I am very disappointed that no podlings took up your suggestion.
I was too. It was answered by the status scoreboard, but that is not
help to graduate, only a bunch of disassociated data. I don't disapprove
of a status grid
Upayavira wrote:
Clearly my chance never came, so let's make it happen now.
The task itself is trivial - send an email to each email address listed
in a file once a month, using a different file for each of a three month
rotation cycle.
Now, the questions are:
1. What date do we send
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
This thread really needs to be put to a conclusion as policy and procedure.
On the table we have:
Suspension would include:
-- disable the mailing lists (no need to moderate)
-- disable commit access (no need to review changes)
-- change the index of
Ross Gardler wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Jim Jagielski wrote:
Are we cool with the name 'wookie' as a mark??
...
Just closing the loop on the various trademark debates being done
on prc@ and members@, of course.
It's called oversight.
Thanks
Author: crossley
Date: Mon Jul 20 23:54:48 2009
New Revision: 796077
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=796077view=rev
Log:
Fix mangled cell id attribute.
Modified:
incubator/public/trunk/site-author/projects/wookie.xml
Modified:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
I suggest that the podling use Jira for tracking the start of a project...
See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACE-1
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIVOT-1
for a reasonable template on what is needed
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
I suggest that the podling use Jira for tracking the start of a project... See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACE-1
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PIVOT-1
for a reasonable template on what is needed.
However please move sub-task #6 on those lists
to be
Stuart Monteith wrote:
Done for Kato, thanks for the reminder.
Great, that helps. Good to see that you managed to
run Clutch too. Thanks.
-David
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional
Would the projects Chemistry, Kato, and Wink
please add themselves to the main Currently in incubation table:
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/
See how to notes via links from the Steps section at
[2] http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html#h-Sponsor
That table [1] and the Wiki
Les Hazlewood wrote:
Everything is just great - thanks so much for taking care of this!
So I guess my next questions are:
How do we update our Incubator home page (
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/shiro.html) to reflect all the right
names and links? Is this something I can do?
I
Les Hazlewood wrote:
The final name moving forward is Apache Shiro. We just haven't been able to
transfer the site over as the Confluence Shiro space hasn't been set up
yet. That hopefully will be done soon - I'll ping infra now to see if they
can escalate this. Thanks for the reminder ;)
Would all projects please ensure that your mentor lists
are up-to-date. We all need to be able to easily remind
ourselves.
The primary location is the Currently in incubation table:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/
Here are some notes about how to edit and publish:
Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Luciano,
Thanks for both: the reminder to add the news to the page, and for
starting a new thread for this item.
I've updated the status page and added the changes to the site. It
should automatically sync shortly.
Luciano Resende wrote:
Could someone
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
SocialSite should have reported this month. Please report each month for
the next three months.
Wink is brand new, but is still required to report, even on status getting
setup. Please report each month for the next three months.
I changed the Wiki page:
Les Hazlewood wrote:
We look forward to all name suggestions, and we appreciate anyone who wishes
to participate!
Another solution is to invent a new word.
I devised a tool to create new names.
It has recently been accepted as a new project at Apache Labs [1].
Using existing relevant words
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Scroll back through the original thread. The point not collisions.
I have a really good chance of getting away with the software project
Apache Kleenex because the Kleenex registration refers to a paper
product, not a software product.
But it does not matter
Would the projects Ace, Chemistry, Kato, and SocialSite
please add themselves to the main Currently in incubation table:
[1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/
See how to notes via links from the Steps section at
[2] http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html#h-Sponsor
That table [1] and the Wiki
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
As an ESME mentor I'm fine with moving it to the normal 3 months interval.
Thanks, i removed it now.
ESME is already listed in group-3 (Mar,Jun,Sep,Dec)
-David
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
David Crossley wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
Thinking more about this, there are three components I could really do
with:
* dev list address
* project name
* board meeting dates
I can scrape the code to identify the board meeting date from Marvin
(assuming I can find him
The http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ReportingSchedule
is out-of-date ...
Monthly (first three months)
* Bluesky (Currently on monthly reporting schedule as per board request)
* Kato (December - February)
* Stonehenge (December - February)
* ESME (January - March)
* Cassandra
Upayavira wrote:
Thinking more about this, there are three components I could really do
with:
* dev list address
* project name
* board meeting dates
I can scrape the code to identify the board meeting date from Marvin
(assuming I can find him). You've given me the dev list
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Gang,
I think that the Graduation of these two projects have not been 'clean'.
Both are still listed as Incubating Projects on projects/index.html,
as well as part of the Incubator project navigation.
Buildr is not listed in projects on www.apache.org, Abdera is listed
Clutch now maintains a list of all mentors and the projects
that they are helping to care for.
See http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html#mentors
(when the web site syncs).
We have 66 mentors assisting. Thanks.
-David
-
To
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
I've spent more time than I actually have right now updating
the 9 million little things that have to get done when Abdera
graduated
The entire process of going through incubation with Abdera has been a
giant pain in my ass
Have fun
David Crossley wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
What I was thinking is to have email lists generated for each podling,
so email could be sent out to the people who care.
For example, in http://incubator.apache.org/report_due_1.txt I'd like
to see
Imperius dev listimperius
sebb wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
e.g. cat report_due_2.txt
BlueSky Cassandra Droids ESME Kato Lokahi PDFBox PhotArk Pivot Sling
Stonehenge VCL WSRP4J XAP
[from the peanut gallery:]
AFAICS that format will be problematical should a podling have one or
more spaces in its name
Craig L Russell wrote:
Thanks for making Clutch and extending it to make it even better.
[ snip ]
Thanks for your feedback. Keep it coming.
What I was thinking is to have email lists generated for each podling,
so email could be sent out to the people who care.
For example, in
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
reports: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2009
Nothing for Cassandra, Droids, Lokahi, Pivot, VCL, or WSRP4J. XAP and
Stonehenge really should have had more to say.
I am concerned about Cassandra. They are new to the Incubator,
but we have not received any
Upayavira wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html
Could clutch in some way be used to mimic Marvin for the Incubator?
I for one would really appreciate an email each month saying what
projects need
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I had asked Dave if he would work on [a Marvin-like script], but I don't
know that anything
got finished. Anyone want to take a shot at it?
Upayavira suggested something useful in another thread.
I can do
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Provided that we get a Marvin like script for PPMC
I had asked Dave if he would work on that, but I don't know that anything
got finished. Anyone want to take a shot at it?
Upayavira suggested something useful in another thread.
I can do that - when i find the
Kato finally added their Status page yesterday.
However it is not done properly, as it is missing from
the Incubation table.
Clutch tries to alert people to such.
See http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html
Refer to the Steps section which attempts
to explain it and link to the docs. In Kato's
Gavin wrote:
David, I've had a quick scan of clutch page, I need to grep it some more to
understand what could be active incubating,
Everything that is in the table is incubating.
what could be ready for the
attic etc - ie there are projects on there that have seen no action for
years.
Gavin wrote:
Below projects are listed in jira category 'Incubator'
Can someone take a quick scan and see if it is accurate, or needs updating.
If so , I'll bring it upto date based on any recommended changes.
Rather than waiting for people to tell you bit-by-bit,
i recommend that you
Upayavira wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html
Could clutch in some way be used to mimic Marvin for the Incubator?
I for one would really appreciate an email each month saying what
projects need to report.
Could simply be group1.html, group2.html
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
The following two new projects exist on the ReportingSchedule, but
doesn't appear on the right-hand menu on Incubator site. This is just
a reminder that it should happen sooner rather than later...
- Kato
- Stonehenge
Yep. Just a reminder that Clutch alerts us all
Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
I have added the 2009 Report Schedule into the Front Page, and also January
2009 Report with due date 12th.
Thanks. However it also needed the templates for all
the projects that are scheduled to report this month.
Done now.
-David
Noel wrote:
Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
Jean-Baptiste Onofr? wrote:
Agree :)
I'm OK with OpenDeploy. I'm waiting for the name to change the package naming
to org.apache.opendeploy
or org.apache.maestro in place of net.sourceforge.buildprocess.autodeploy.
A simple test ...
Search the net for the single word OpenDeploy ...
There
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-27?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12655428#action_12655428
]
David Crossley commented on INCUBATOR-27:
-
See the new document:
http
Hirsch, Richard wrote:
Hi Matthias,
It was a little bit strange to see mails from 2004 describing the same
problem. I would assume that all podlings have the same problem.
Since I have seen recent podlings (from 2007) who have performed this task,
I'm hoping that there is some sort of a
David Crossley wrote:
Tim Williams wrote:
Hi David,
Nice to hear from you Tim.
I suppose you can't please everyone, but the red/green colors in this
version are difficult to distinguish - colorblind. It would help to
find a shade of green with lighter/darker tone (e.g. 33cc66
Garrett Rooney wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Abdera graduated (CONGRATS!). We voted +1 for their graduation, their
resolution was put in front of the board and it passed. So why does
the clutch status page still consider them incubating?
I don't know where
Garrett Rooney wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
You probably found out, but it gets its data from various sources:
http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html#notes
Whatever it gets fed.
I will be pleased to see if Clutch works for you.
My crappy first attempt at Python.
Worked fine
to portray: where is the care and
attention needed.
-David
Martijn
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
...I am happy with the result.
See http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html
after the next publishing rsync
What I'm seeing there is like
Tim Williams wrote:
Hi David,
Nice to hear from you Tim.
I suppose you can't please everyone, but the red/green colors in this
version are difficult to distinguish - colorblind. It would help to
find a shade of green with lighter/darker tone (e.g. 33cc66)? Anyway,
my nit-picky 2cents.
Craig L Russell wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
...IIRC (and it's been a while) any member can alter the paperwork
once
there's been a board ACK. can anyone from boardland confirm or deny
this?...
I think that's fine, as
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
Daniel Kulp wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
You asked earlier how to find out who is on Incubator PMC
and hence binding votes:
http://people.apache.org/~jim/projects.html#incubator-pmc
cool (i didn't realise this existed)
Yes, very useful. The Clutch table
These reports are due at the wiki page by 10 December 2008
so that the Incubator PMC can relay them to the board.
See http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/December2008
There is one other project that is recently accepted:
ESME
You can still report this month if you want to.
-David
Darren Hague wrote:
As there have been 8 positive votes with no negative votes, I would like
to declare the vote PASSED.
Votes were received from the following people:
* Bertrand Delacretaz
* Craig L Russell
Daniel Kulp
* Davanum Srinivas
* Ian Holsman
* J Aaron Farr
* Robert Burrell
Author: twgoetz
Date: Wed Dec 3 02:10:44 2008
New Revision: 722831
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=722831view=rev
Log:
Update status: new committers Tong and Jerry
Modified:
incubator/public/trunk/site-author/projects/uima.xml
People seem to be forgetting to re-generate the
Darren Hague wrote:
As there have been 8 positive votes with no negative votes, I would like
to declare the vote PASSED.
Votes were received from the following people:
* Bertrand Delacretaz
* Craig L Russell
Daniel Kulp
* Davanum Srinivas
* Ian Holsman
* J Aaron Farr
* Robert Burrell
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Clutch is an invaluable tool, but with some coloring issues according
to me: the current coloring schema is not well suited to alert me, or
they alert me at the wrong moment, or don't alert me when things get
out of shape.
Thanks for your feedback. I will try to
David Crossley wrote:
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Clutch is an invaluable tool, but with some coloring issues according
to me: the current coloring schema is not well suited to alert me, or
they alert me at the wrong moment, or don't alert me when things get
out of shape.
...
Anyway, i
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:17:33AM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Darren Hague wrote:
Hi Aaron,
Are we ready for the next steps of accepting ESME into the Incubator?
The Apache Incubator general mailing list seems to have been quiet since
Saturday 21st November, so I'm not
Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
When I look at the OpenWebBeans in the clutch status table,
column E: hasReportingGroup - did podling remember to choose a group
is colored as a read flag.
How will we change this color to yellow?
By choosing a reporting group.
Go to the ReportingSchedule wiki page
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Only one of these at a time, let's give each podling our undivided
attention on [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'll post the first appeal just as soon as
I get it.
What a great idea Bill. Good on you.
The Clutch table assists with a status summary.
It is also helpful
is ready at:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/openwebbeans/
You should now co-ordinate on your dev mail list and decide
what directory structure and implement it with 'svn mkdir'.
Look around at other projects for examples.
-David
David Crossley wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
Gurkan
Paul Fremantle wrote:
Thanks to everyone involved and I'll be in contact with the mentors to
get the ball rolling on infrastructure.
I noticed that you have commenced some next steps,
adding stonehenge to the svn authorisation.
However you missed one part of that:
David Crossley wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Martijn Dashorst
Is it possible that empire-db is listed wrong for reporting this month?
Looks like it. I moved it to the Oct/Jan/Apr/Jul group.
However Empire-db was/is already on the group-3
March, June, September, December. Now
Kevan Miller wrote:
Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
I looked at the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1775 for
creating the SVN, but it is commented with Not an infra task. Needs
to be
done by someone on the incubator pmc.
How will we going on?
David Crossley already took care
Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
I am the comitter of the recently incubator OpenWebBeans. I tried to do tasks
that are explained in the http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html to
update OpenWebBeans site (to put it into the site-author/projects/index.xml,
and
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
There are a few things wrong with the STATUS template. It also gets the
order of graduation votes wrong.
Ok. My vote is still to have a JIRA Task template (with subtasks
pre-populate) instead. So much more accessible, flexible and accurate.
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Gang,
The STATUS template says;
quote
Ask infrastructure to create source repository modules and grant the
committers karma.
/quote
But I have also been told on lists that the PMC Chair is responsible
for Authorization.
So what is it?
Missing punctuation,
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
There are a few things wrong with the STATUS template. It also gets the
order of graduation votes wrong.
Ok. My vote is still to have a JIRA Task template (with subtasks
pre-populate
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
Depends on what take it out of the incubator means:
- graduation to TLP
- graduation to sub project
- stop incubation altogether and possibly continue elsewhere
Graduation is covered in the graduation guide [1], stopping (aka
failing) is not covered in a guide
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Michael,
I found a problem that might be the problem. Can you try it now?
To decrypt: The Subversion authorisation was missing the
section that enabled the tashi group to edit Incubator pages.
Hmmm I thought the STATUS page was a Mentor
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Martijn Dashorst
Is it possible that empire-db is listed wrong for reporting this month?
Looks like it. I moved it to the Oct/Jan/Apr/Jul group.
However Empire-db was/is already on the group-3
March, June, September, December. Now duplicated.
I think the problem is
to pick up those and other changes.
It seems a little slow at the moment while doing the
'svn log' for each project's status file.
-David
David Crossley wrote:
I recently found that some new projects get a little
lost at the acceptance phase. Also we have a large
number of projects in Incubation
Author: kevan
Date: Wed Nov 5 12:14:38 2008
New Revision: 711682
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=711682view=rev
Log:
Generate OpenWebBeans status page
Added:
incubator/public/trunk/site-author/projects/openwebbeans.xml (with
props)
David Crossley wrote:
See http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2008
There is one other project that is recently accepted:
OpenWebBeans
You can still report this month if you want to.
Otherwise, please add your project to the ReportingSchedule
page, ready for next month.
I see
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
I presume that the pmc-chairs group should have
access, but it does not currently.
To Incubator PMC, should we add a special handler
for the incubator/donations/ directory?
I agree, and at least pmc-chairs
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
Greg Reddin wrote:
Using the path you specified above I was unable to commit a new
directory containing sigs and a .zip file.
as david pointed, this is likely to be a permissions issue. you can
either wait until we've sorted it out or create a JIRA
See http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/November2008
There is one other project that is recently accepted:
OpenWebBeans
You can still report this month if you want to.
Otherwise, please add your project to the ReportingSchedule
page, ready for next month.
-David
Issue Type: Task
Components: site
Reporter: David Crossley
Document the process.
Some steps were thoughtfully provided by Leo and Matthieu for TripleSoup:
Re: TripleSoup going into dormant mode
http://markmail.org/message/kavm65g65x55wqr5
--
This message
Greg Reddin wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/donations/
.^
Is there some documentation that led you astray
or just a slip?
I didn't type the right URL or even the right path in my email, sorry.
Using the path
Greg Reddin wrote:
Am I (as chair of Apache Tiles PMC) supposed to have commit karma to
the /repos/asf/donations repo? I'm trying to commit the velocity-tiles
donation and could not commit it. Am I on the wrong track or is my
authorization not correct?
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
I am a mentor / champion on the recently accepted OpenWebBeans effort.
Is it possible to become part of the Incubator PMC (I am an asf member),
in order to have some binding votes ? I think in the past we did the same
in our Trinidad
Luciano Resende wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
Mail lists:
Should people just partipipate on the podling's
dev mail list in their own languages? Then expect
that someone summarises the outcomes and decisions
into English/Japanese. Or would it be better
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Thorsten Scherler wrote:
One more thing we need is:
ssh people.apache.org
cd /www/incubator.apache.org/
mkdir droids
chown droids:droids droids
However if I am doing groups on people I do not get the droids group
but I remembered that you said you have set it up.
Luciano Resende wrote:
J Aaron's slides available at
http://cubiclemuses.com/cm/blog/2007/open_source_china_presentation.html
The link to its PDF is broken.i
I did find it at:
http://www.us.apachecon.com/us2007/downloads/open_source_in_china.pdf
-David
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
David Crossley wrote:
My initial question was about how to conduct the
mailing list discussions. Of course the issues
are much wider. Some feeling for how to handle
these issues will help us to make a better
proposal to the Incubator.
For example, some
301 - 400 of 632 matches
Mail list logo
