- Original Message
> From: Benson Margulies
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, December 1, 2010 10:53:35 AM
> Subject: Re: Basing Apache releases on releases from incubating projects
>
> I agree with Joe.
>
> a) I've been involved in a number of such releases.
>
> b) A p
- Original Message
> From: Owen O'Malley
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, December 1, 2010 10:48:48 AM
> Subject: Basing Apache releases on releases from incubating projects
>
> In http://bit.ly/fhCxIt , Steve argued that it isn't permitted for
> non-podling releases to
site-...@apache
- Original Message
> From: Matthew Sacks
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tue, November 30, 2010 12:31:47 PM
> Subject: CMS Mailing List
>
> Is there a mailing list for questions about CMS: i.e. customization.
>
> Thanks,
> msacks
>
> -
- Original Message
> From: Tad Glines
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Fri, November 26, 2010 9:47:33 AM
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Accept Wave for incubation
>
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>
> > Yet, we have in the past had similar situations, wh
Done.
- Original Message
> From: Patrick Hunt
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Sat, November 13, 2010 1:17:45 AM
> Subject: Re: Please add me to the Incubator UNIX group
>
> Sorry, that is I'm trying to finalize the Whirr release. Thanks.
>
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:16
Why not use the CMS? http://www.apache.org/dev/cms.html
- Original Message
> From: Matthew Sacks
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, November 11, 2010 6:27:19 PM
> Subject: podling site question
>
> I am interested in having a podling site set up for the kitty project.
>
Fixed.
- Original Message
> From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)"
> To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
> Sent: Wed, November 10, 2010 1:20:54 PM
> Subject: OODT release appearing in mirrors
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> I'm not seeing our OODT release hit the mirrors as quick as it normally
> does.
Noel, the thrift graduation vote happened right here on this list
over the past week or two. Please pass the resolution onto the
board in this month's report.
- Original Message
> From: Noel J. Bergman
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Mon, October 18, 2010 3:12:59 PM
> Subj
+1, nice job folks. Happy to see this finally happen
for Thrift.
- Original Message
> From: Bryan Duxbury
> To: general@incubator.apache.org; thrift-...@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Fri, October 8, 2010 5:00:02 PM
> Subject: [VOTE] Thrift to graduate from the incubator
>
> All,
>
>
Sorry, everything looks good to me.
+1
- Original Message
> From: Bryan Duxbury
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tue, October 5, 2010 6:41:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Thrift 0.5.0 RC1
>
> Hey all,
>
> Just a gentle reminder that I need your votes to get this release out...
You could ask for supporting votes on priv...@incubator
if you are short of the magic number of 3, but yes that's
the gist of it, at least for hise.
- Original Message
> From: Glen Daniels
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Sun, September 26, 2010 1:46:37 PM
> Subject: Re: HISE
been there already, or should
> I mail them and ask them to subscribe themselves?
Either approach is fine IMO. Thanks for getting on top of this.
>
> Thanks,
> --Glen
>
> On 9/25/2010 10:26 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > Give Matthew Riou and Glen Daniels time to re
> From: Benson Margulies
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Sat, September 25, 2010 10:30:02 PM
> Subject: Re: HISE community needs to grow
>
> Certainly. I didn't mean to imply any sort of instant action, I was
> just trying to clarify the policy question.
>
>
at, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:22 PM, Joe Schaefer
wrote:
> > NFI. Not something I would've done.
>
> So my view is that the vote to establish the podling, accepting the
> proposal that is sitting on the Wiki, convened that group as the
> initial PPMC. Oh fellow integrator PMC
NFI. Not something I would've done.
- Original Message
> From: Benson Margulies
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Sat, September 25, 2010 10:20:23 PM
> Subject: Re: HISE community needs to grow
>
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Joe Schaefer
None of the committers on hise are on the private list. It's
manned by 2 mentors only. That should be fixed asap- you've
personally done more than enough work on hise to be on the pmc.
- Original Message
> From: Rafal Rusin
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Sat, September 2
- Original Message
> From: Bertrand Delacretaz
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, September 16, 2010 7:40:22 AM
> Subject: Re: Accepting patches in a podling
>
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Benson Margulies
>wrote:
> > ...It takes about two minutes to make a JIRA. I
- Original Message
> From: Craig L Russell
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, September 15, 2010 8:05:01 PM
> Subject: Re: Accepting patches in a podling
>
>
> On Sep 15, 2010, at 4:41 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>
> > - Original Mess
- Original Message
> From: David Lutterkort
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, September 15, 2010 7:33:45 PM
> Subject: Re: Accepting patches in a podling
>
> On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 04:22 +0200, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > FWIW, what Subversion uses:
> >
> >
>http://subvers
He says should, not must. Mailing lists are contribution
mechanisms as well (per the license), so patches submitted
there which aren't marked "Not a contribution" are acceptable.
Jira's checkbox is the belt and suspenders approach.
- Original Message
> From: Daniel Shahaf
> To: genera
Knowing Roy he'd probably want to see them
all renamed u...@.
- Original Message
> From: Mark Struberg
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, September 9, 2010 6:31:05 PM
> Subject: Re: No dev-, user- lists for small podlings (was: Re: [PROPOSAL]
> Kitty
>to Enter the Incuba
Skimming over the river lists over the past year, I'd have
to say that my only real concern is that their last release
took them a full month or so to execute. Nobody in the community
really participated, and tho eventually some +1's did get
thrown in it isn't clear that those people had actually
Many graduating projects trim their list of committers / ppmc members,
primarily because the list of initial committers rarely reflects the active
people on the project.
In your case just ask infra to remove the committer from the project acl.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 23, 2010, at 9:44 PM, B
participated!
- Original Message
> From: Joe Schaefer
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, August 18, 2010 7:11:39 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] experimental delegation of new committer votes to PPMC
>
> Now that the board has declared there are no legal
> obs
+1.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBMbpiesxshPSCPUGQRArlzAJ0YY3qzuMj8m+oFbWvUZ4qzfdShgACdGAyI
mChkZUKGiROca8GPTNhsQN4=
=60lX
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
- Original Message
> From: Bryan Duxbury
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, Au
members should know the Apache terminology (before
>exiting incubation).
Fair enough.
>
> Craig
>
> On Aug 19, 2010, at 2:17 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>
> > Didn't you just suggest that Greg summarily drop
> > his use of local terminology from his reports
- Original Message
> From: Bryan Duxbury
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, August 19, 2010 4:51:00 PM
> Subject: [VOTE] Thrift 0.4.0 RC1
> On thrift-dev, we had 7 +1 votes, including 3 from active Thrift committers
> (myself, Mark Slee, and David Reiss) and one from a me
> Craig
>
> On Aug 19, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>
> > Cmon Craig. Subversion is a 10-year old community. Making major changes
> > in basic terminology isn't something that happens in a day.
> >
>
> Craig L Russell
> Architect, Ora
- Original Message
> From: Craig L Russell
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, August 19, 2010 2:38:48 PM
> Subject: Re: Subversion full/partial committer (was: Re: an experiment)
>
>
> On Aug 19, 2010, at 11:30 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> > As I said in my other post, by u
Now that the board has declared there are no legal
obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
restart the vote.
Thanks for your patience and consideration.
- Original Message
> From: Joe Schaefer
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Mon, August 16, 2010 1:44:0
- Original Message
> From: Ross Gardler
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tue, August 17, 2010 7:51:42 PM
> Subject: Re: Radical revamp
>
> On 17/08/2010 17:45, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > I do
> > question the idea that just having 3 Members on
as TLP
>
> On 8/18/10 1:15 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >> In other word, the release *is* the SVN revision that has been voted.
> > Bzzt. The release package may contain files not found in svn. See httpd
> > releases for examples. That is why the document you refere
FWIW Greg once complained about infra's use of machine names
in our board reports as being a bit too cloistered for the
board to follow coherently. To address this we added
parentheticals that associated more common service names
to the first usage of any hostname and so far the board has
found tha
- Original Message
> From: Emmanuel Lecharny
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tue, August 17, 2010 7:09:12 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Shiro graduation as TLP
>
> On 8/18/10 12:24 AM, Kalle Korhonen wrote:
> >
> > I'm with Stefano there: I do contest the view that svn is
+1.
- Original Message
> From: Gav...
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tue, August 17, 2010 4:28:04 PM
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache Shiro graduation as TLP
>
> [X] +1 - Recommend graduation of Apache Shiro as a TLP
>
> Nice work.
>
> Gav...
>
>
> > -Original Message
- Original Message
> From: Craig L Russell
> To: Incubator ; Apache Board
> Sent: Tue, August 17, 2010 12:42:18 PM
> Subject: Re: an experiment
>
>
> On Aug 16, 2010, at 6:37 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> > I certainly could have handled it better. But that thread is
> > *indicative* of
- Original Message
> From: Carl Trieloff
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tue, August 17, 2010 12:35:29 PM
> Subject: Re: Radical revamp
>
> I've been following this thread, and have another mail written, but not
> posted,
> maybe I will at some point... however I find myse
- Original Message
> From: Ross Gardler
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tue, August 17, 2010 8:45:01 AM
> Subject: Re: Radical revamp
>
> On 17/08/2010 13:21, Joe Schaefer wrote:
[...]
> > Isn't that why we encourage IPMC members to particip
- Original Message
> From: Benson Margulies
> To: j...@apache.org; general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tue, August 17, 2010 8:36:47 AM
> Subject: Incubator release docs versus main release docs
>
> Joe,
>
> As I recall, I did a swath of editing to the non-incubator release docs to
>
- Original Message
> From: Ross Gardler
> To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
> Cc: "general@incubator.apache.org"
> Sent: Tue, August 17, 2010 4:14:02 AM
> Subject: Re: Radical revamp (was: an experiment)
>
> On 17 Aug 2010, at 03:53, Joe Sc
46 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 22:31, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: Noel J. Bergman
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Mon, August 16, 2010 10:00:40 PM
Subject: RE: Radical revamp (was: an experiment)
Greg Stein wrote:
Using this model decentralize
- Original Message
> From: Noel J. Bergman
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Mon, August 16, 2010 10:00:40 PM
> Subject: RE: Radical revamp (was: an experiment)
>
> Greg Stein wrote:
>
> > Using this model decentralizes the process
>
> So does having 3+ PMC Members today.
> discussion this past week, initiated by Joe Schaefer regarding making
> Incubator projects more self-governing. Although a valid goal, the actual
> proposals appear troubling in terms of ASF governance structure.
>
> A specific proposal, for which Joe would like a formal vo
- Original Message
> From: Noel J. Bergman
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Mon, August 16, 2010 2:22:02 PM
> Subject: RE: [VOTE] experimental delegation of new committer votes to PPMC
>
> Joe Schaefer wrote:
>
> > I have come to the realiza
- Original Message
> From: Noel J. Bergman
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Mon, August 16, 2010 2:02:15 PM
> Subject: RE: an experiment
>
> Joe Schaefer wrote:
>
> > Are you trying to tell me that both jakarta and httpd have been in
> viol
- Original Message
> From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)"
> To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
> Sent: Mon, August 16, 2010 1:48:38 PM
> Subject: [DISCUSS] experimental delegation of new committer votes to PPMC
> (was
>Re: [VOTE] experimental delegation of new committer votes to PPMC)
>
I have come to the realization that I'm not
going to convince Noel to see things my way
any time soon, so I'd like to now ask for a
formal majority consensus vote on relaxed rules
for the 3 aforementioned projects.
Specifically, for thrift, sis, and esme, I wish to
remove the current rule that req
- Original Message
> From: Justin Erenkrantz
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Mon, August 16, 2010 12:45:17 PM
> Subject: Re: an experiment
>
> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> > And if the Mentors aren't being active, voting, etc., then *that* is wh
- Original Message
> From: Noel J. Bergman
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Mon, August 16, 2010 12:18:39 PM
> Subject: RE: an experiment
>
> > I'd like to start experimenting with different organizational
> > and procedural approaches to the projects I participate in
> > her
- Original Message
> From: Craig L Russell
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, August 12, 2010 2:21:44 PM
> Subject: Re: an experiment
>
>
> On Aug 11, 2010, at 10:45 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>
> > The first idea should be fairly straightforw
- Original Message
> From: Niclas Hedhman
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, August 12, 2010 1:13:41 AM
> Subject: Re: an experiment
> Yes, definitely more controversial. Pros would include greater
> exposure to the Incubator noise, learning from others, becoming part
> o
- Original Message
> From: Stefan Bodewig
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, August 12, 2010 12:43:59 AM
> Subject: Re: an experiment
> There isn't anything that would stop a mentor from proposing a podling
> committer who is not an ASF member as an IPMC member today, is
- Original Message
> From: Matt Benson
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, August 11, 2010 5:19:53 PM
> Subject: Re: an experiment
>
>
> On Aug 11, 2010, at 4:14 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > - Original Message
- Original Message
> From: Joe Schaefer
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, August 11, 2010 8:14:26 PM
> Subject: Re: an experiment
>
> - Original Message
>
> > From: Davanum Srinivas
> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> >
members
If we're concerned about tracking, we could simplify the
rule to say only ASF members on the IPMC may participate
in graduation voting. Otherwise publishing a list of
podling committers on the IPMC would probably be required,
which I'd like to avoid as well ;-).
>
> -- d
- Original Message
> From: Davanum Srinivas
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, August 11, 2010 6:28:17 PM
> Subject: Re: an experiment
>
> Ant,
>
> My personal opinion (and i am hoping!) was that such individuals
> from ppmc's who end up in ipmc would help build bridges
>
- Original Message
> From: ant elder
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, August 11, 2010 6:16:16 PM
> Subject: Re: an experiment
>
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>
>
> > The second idea is more controversial: to hol
- Original Message
> From: Joe Schaefer
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, August 11, 2010 5:29:55 PM
> Subject: Re: an experiment
>
> - Original Message
>
> > From: Donald Woods
> > To: general@incubator.apache.org
> >
- Original Message
> From: Donald Woods
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, August 11, 2010 5:19:03 PM
> Subject: Re: an experiment
>
>
>
> On 8/11/10 1:45 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > So. Following some advice given to me by Sam Ruby,
>
- Original Message
> From: Davanum Srinivas
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, August 11, 2010 5:07:33 PM
> Subject: Re: an experiment
>
> +1 to IPMC delegates to the PPMC the decision-making
> process for voting in new committers (one question,
> would they need an ACK
So. Following some advice given to me by Sam Ruby,
I'd like to start experimenting with different organizational
and procedural approaches to the projects I participate in
here. What I want to do is to see how far I can push
the envelope on the whole notion of empowerment and
self-governance in
Done.
- Original Message
> From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)"
> To: "general@incubator.apache.org"
> Cc: "oodt-...@incubator.apache.org"
> Sent: Sun, August 8, 2010 4:52:48 PM
> Subject: Add kelly and woollard to incubator UNIX group
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> Over in OODT land, we've recently
+1! Here's my sig:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBMVviIsxshPSCPUGQRApNZAJ49lb9eDNUBJfPhq4jAGNOwmFXAbACfRSGE
vFDE142T5ItrfxK4fhfM0QQ=
=Pwz7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
- Original Message
> From: Doug Cutting
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
>
- Original Message
> From: Upayavira
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Sat, May 29, 2010 4:58:21 PM
> Subject: Re: Incubator proposal template
>
> On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 08:08 -0700, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> I really don't see the upshot, because a
I really don't see the upshot, because after a while
people will mostly be "plagarizing" the earlier answers
of others.
- Original Message
> From: Tim Williams
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Sat, May 29, 2010 11:01:02 AM
> Subject: Re: Incubator proposal template
>
> On S
While I haven't looked at what Shiro has done, your
explanation of the relevance of a buildable source
package sounds fine.
- Original Message
> From: ant elder
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, May 26, 2010 11:11:29 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Shiro version 1.0.0-i
While I'm not planning to vote on this, I did want to comment
on what a nice job you've done of collecting all the relevant
info together. Thank you.
- Original Message
> From: Kalle Korhonen
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tue, May 25, 2010 6:32:45 PM
> Subject: [VOTE] Re
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Sun, April 11, 2010 3:26:26 PM
> Subject: Re: Latest incarnation of site update?
>
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 4:20 AM, Joe Schaefer <
> ymailto="mailto:joe_schae...@yahoo.com";
> href="mailto:joe_schae...@yahoo.com&q
We switched the hourly find script from ctimes to mtimes
to cut down on the rsync traffic by 10x. Since there have
been so many complaints about this I will switch it back now.
- Original Message
> From: sebb
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Sun, April 11, 2010 7:17:48 AM
>
+1
- Original Message
> From: Brett Porter
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, March 4, 2010 5:23:08 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] - Graduate Log4PHP as a subproject of Logging project
>
> +1
>
> On 04/03/2010, at 8:18 PM, Gav... wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > The Log4PHP comm
Leo Simons just put a great post on Planet Apache
(planet.apache.org/committers) about a reasonably
robust way for a project to manage their codebase
in svn. Here is the link:
http://lsimons.wordpress.com/2010/02/19/
using-long-lived-stable-branches/?utm_source=feedburner
&utm_medium=feed&utm_
Perfectly A-OK!
- Original Message
> From: Greg Reddin
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, February 17, 2010 11:03:58 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL] Spatial Information Systems Proposal
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 7:25 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
> wrote:
> > More than one
I'll mentor the damned thing if nobody else will. Maybe I'll
learn something from Ian since he was so successful with cassandra.
- Original Message
> From: Bertrand Delacretaz
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, February 17, 2010 10:38:23 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE][PROPOSAL]
- Original Message
> From: Bertrand Delacretaz
> To: esme-...@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tue, February 16, 2010 11:28:22 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve the release of apache-esme-incubating-1.0
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 4:05 PM, Richard
ship Status Check 2010
>
> Joe Schaefer wrote:
>
> > Didn't get an email from you.
>
> Check your @apache.org e-mail. That is the address to which it went, and
> you were on the list.
>
> There was ONE e-mail sent to the ASF mail server, with all of the addr
Didn't get an email from you.
- Original Message
> From: Noel J. Bergman
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Mon, February 15, 2010 11:16:56 AM
> Subject: Incubator PMC Membership Status Check 2010
>
> I have sent an e-mail directly to everyone who is officially on the
> Incuba
+1!
- Original Message
> From: Greg Stein
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: d...@subversion.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, February 11, 2010 11:08:07 PM
> Subject: [VOTE] Subversion podling for graduation
>
> Hello all,
>
> I started a discussion thread a week-ish ago to seek out iss
In that case it wouldn't hurt to notifiy gene...@incubator about
this issue, so I've ccd them. The skinny is that esme has had a
committer violate ASF policy on copyright notices in his commits
and he elected to resign instead of comply. ESME is mopping up
after him, and this is what they've deci
discussion/proposal/vote threads for the new names.
Welcome to Apache.
On 1/5/10 12:24 PM, "Branko Čibej" wrote:
Joe Schaefer wrote:
Having 3 Sean's all working simultaneously on the same project
would be unprecedented, and probably violates some Incubator rule
on diversity. 2 Sea
Having 3 Sean's all working simultaneously on the same project
would be unprecedented, and probably violates some Incubator rule
on diversity. 2 Sean's is the max we could accept come
graduation time.
- Original Message
> From: "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)"
> To: "general@incubator.apach
What's the relationship with OODT Agility? Is that
part of the contribution as well, or a separate endeavor?
http://agility.jpl.nasa.gov/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional
- Original Message
> From: Ralph Goers
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, December 31, 2009 9:27:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation
>
>
> On Dec 31, 2009, at 3:40 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
>
> >>
- Original Message
> From: Phil Steitz
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, December 31, 2009 1:54:18 AM
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation
>
> Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > - Original Message
> >
&
- Original Message
> From: Phil Steitz
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, December 30, 2009 3:10:47 PM
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation
>
> Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > - Original Message
> >
&
- Original Message
> From: Phil Steitz
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wed, December 30, 2009 1:30:13 PM
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation
>
> Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > - Original Message
> >
- Original Message
> From: Niclas Hedhman
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Sat, December 12, 2009 9:42:21 PM
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenCMIS incubator for Content Mangement
> Interoperability Services (CMIS)
>
> The Board has in the past condemned "balkanization" of commu
- Original Message
> From: Emmanuel Lcharny
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Sat, December 12, 2009 7:32:53 PM
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenCMIS incubator for Content Mangement
> Interoperability Services (CMIS)
>
> Michael Wechner a écrit :
> > Emmanuel Lcharny wrote:
> >>
- Original Message
> From: Florent Guillaume
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: chemistry-...@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Sat, December 12, 2009 10:35:18 AM
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] OpenCMIS incubator for Content Mangement
> Interoperability Services (CMIS)
>
> On Fri, Dec 11,
o be a vibrant community around the existing Commons Validation project
> today.
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
> Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > - Original Message
> >
> >> From: Niall Pemberton
> >> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> >> Sent: Fri, Dece
- Original Message
> From: Niall Pemberton
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Fri, December 11, 2009 6:29:26 AM
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> >
- Original Message
> From: ant elder
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Fri, December 11, 2009 5:22:13 AM
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Validation incubator for JSR-303 Bean Validation
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Niall Pemberton
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:56 AM,
In particular Thrift is looking for 2 more +1's from
IPMC people in order to continue the release process.
Thanks!
- Original Message
> From: Todd Lipcon
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, December 10, 2009 2:50:04 PM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Thrift 0.2.0
>
> Hi all
- Original Message
> From: Niclas Hedhman
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Tue, December 8, 2009 1:03:51 AM
> Subject: Re: How documentation != code, and how to "do" policy (was: Re:
> Publishing api docs for Subversion)
>
> On Tue, Dec 8
There's also a world of difference between worldwide distribution
and distribution to a self-selected subgroup. Niclas has no clue
what he's talking about when liability considerations are factored in,
and as this is not a list where legal council for the ASF makes itself
available I suggest his w
- Original Message
> From: Doug Cutting
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Mon, December 7, 2009 6:24:18 PM
> Subject: Re: Publishing api docs for Subversion
>
> Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > Exactly. That's the key difference between a release and a w
- Original Message
> From: Paul Querna
> To: general@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Mon, December 7, 2009 5:34:18 PM
> Subject: Re: Publishing api docs for Subversion
>
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
> > William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> >>
> >> I suspect that renaming /
A lot of our website stuff has peculiar licensing on it; and I don't
think anyone really cares whether or not a given webpage is Apache-licensed
or not. So I think Doug is stretching things a bit when he equates the
standards for software releases and standards for website publishing
(where we onl
The only thing that should block a release is a policy
violation, either of the IPMC or the ASF. This doesn't
appear to be the case.
Sebb, I'd like to suggest you join the IPMC so you can
issue binding +/- 1's instead of overall vetoes (which
carry no weight unless it pertains to policy).
cubator.apache.org
> Cc: thrift-...@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Sat, November 21, 2009 4:50:45 AM
> Subject: Re: Distribution management
>
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 5:52 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > ...The fact
> > is that the extended thrift community has been using subversion to
> &
- Original Message
> From: Kevin Clark
> To: thrift-...@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Fri, November 20, 2009 11:02:39 PM
> Subject: Re: Distribution management
>
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > At Apache we do our work where it can
301 - 400 of 449 matches
Mail list logo
