Looks ok to me so +1.
Would be helpful to include a RAT report with the request, but I ran it
myself and it didn't highlight any issues.
If the doc pdf is going to be distributed separately it should probably
include the Incubator disclaimer text, maybe on the page which already has
the Apache
+1
...ant
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 8:57 PM, Marshall Schor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Please review and vote on approving the 1st release of Apache UIMA-AS, an
add-on to base UIMA. The release artifacts and the annotated RAT reports
can be found here:
+1
...ant
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 10:52 AM, Jörn Kottmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
the Cas Editor is a text annotation tool which supports manual and
automatic
annotation of CAS files. It is now ready for its first release.
Please review and vote for releasing the Apache Uima Cas
Looks ok to me, jar has good license/notice/disclaimer, signatures verify
etc.
+1
...ant
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
this is just a small hotfix. Could some kind
IPMC souls please take a look? Thanks!
--Thilo
Michael Baessler
The NOTICE file in the distribution is missing the line Copyright
[] The Apache Software Foundation at the top of the file. Was
going to say thats a blocker but the doc at
http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html only says should not
MUST so I guess its ok to just fix this for next time.
Forwarding for those not on tuscany-dev...
Congratulations everyone and a very big thank you to our mentors and all the
incubator folks for their help and guidance during the incubation, wouldn't
have made it without you.
...ant
-- Forwarded message --
From: Matthieu Riou
,
Matthieu Riou, Davanum Srinivas, William A. Rowe, Jr., Bertrand Delacretaz
Many many thanks to everyone for all the help during the incubation.
...ant
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 7:51 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After 29 months in the incubator, 19 releases, 25 new committers, and
tons
Dear root,
Please create an id for Mario Antollini on the Tuscany project under Incubation.
Preferred userid: antollinim
Full name: Mario Antollini
Forwarding email address:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Requested Karma for: ws-tuscany
ICLA is on file.
of the Apache Tuscany Project; and be it further
RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
Apache Tuscany Project:
* Adriano Crestani adrianocrestani at apache dot org
* ant elder antelder at apache dot org
Dear root,
Please create an id for Feng Wang on the Tuscany project under Incubation.
Preferred userid: fwang
Full name: Feng Wang
Forwarding email address:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Requested Karma for: ws-tuscany
ICLA is on file.
Votes:
+1 from me too. Had reviewed this last week but must have forgotten to post
the vote.
...ant
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Michael Baessler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Apache UIMA project ask the Apache Incubator PMC
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:24 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:47 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 13 April 2008 19:30, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
IMHO the emphasis on committer affiliation is misguided. overloading
+1
...ant
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The Apache Tuscany project request IPMC permission to release the Java
SCA 1.2-incubating. The vote thread is here ...
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg30405.html
The artifacts
The poor UIMA guys have been trying to get this release approved for nearly
two weeks now and it still has just a single vote. Could a couple of other
IPMCers take a look and vote?
...ant
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Marshall Schor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Incubator PMC -
Thank
Looks ok to me, +1
...ant
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks, just a quick reminder that this vote is still
open. Please vote if you can find the time to look
at our release. Thanks.
--Thilo
Michael Baessler wrote:
The Apache UIMA
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 12:30 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:27 PM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
That would make the PPMC be about 50% IBM day job and 50% (non IBMers
or
IBM non-day jobers). Can we take it to a private list
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:47 AM, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sunday 13 April 2008 19:30, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
IMHO the emphasis on committer affiliation is misguided. overloading
the word diversity was also probably a mistake. maybe we need to focus
on
The Apache Tuscany team are pleased to announce the 1.1-incubating
release of the Java SDO project.
Service Data Objects (SDO) are designed to simplify and unify the way
in which applications handle data. Using SDO, application programmers
can uniformly access and manipulate data from
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 7:54 PM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ant elder wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
There is a discussion going on Tuscany dev list whether the SDO part
of
the community would like to join the new project in the event it
will
get approved
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a discussion going on Tuscany dev list whether the SDO part of
the community would like to join the new project in the event it will
get approved in incubation. Once there is a consensus, Kelvin will
Passed with +1s from Matthieu, Paul, and me.
Thanks for the reviews everyone.
...ant
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:10 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please vote to approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO.
This is RC4 fixing the issues found in the previous RC2. The release
artifacts
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:08 AM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
For files without src license headers, I was referring to files like:
==C:/Tuscany/Distros/SDO/1.1-rc4a/tuscany-sdo-1.1-incubating-src/impl/model/SDO.mdl
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:35 AM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/04/2008, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 10, 2008, at 8:42 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
The files that have this license are listed in the LICENSE [1] file
(search for Apache Tuscany SDO for Java
Should have voted myself, so +1.
Anyone else able to review and vote on this?
...ant
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 12:10 AM, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please vote to approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO.
This is RC4 fixing the issues found in the previous RC2. The release
artifacts
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 4:31 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
i've been a passive subscriber to the tuscany list for quite a while
now and to me, from the lists, it feels like an open community
It's been a while since we discussed this.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 7:07 PM, Matthieu Riou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 4/10/08, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 4:31 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
i've been a passive subscriber
Please vote to approve the 1.1 release of Tuscany SDO.
This is RC4 fixing the issues found in the previous RC2. The release
artifacts including source and binary distributions, maven staging
repository, and RAT report are at:
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1-rc4a
The tag for
Dear root,
Please create an id for Giorgio Zoppi on the Tuscany project under
Incubation.
Preferred userid: giorgio or 2nd choice gzoppi
Full name: Giorgio Zoppi
Forwarding email address:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Requested Karma for: ws-tuscany
On Jan 31, 2008 5:40 AM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and only the PPMC member votes are binding.
The error is the use of PPMC. It should say that only PMC member votes
are binding.
--- Noel
Now I'm confused. If it says only PMC member votes are binding does that
mean
On Jan 28, 2008, at 11:20 PM, ant elder wrote:
I'm not sure those votes on cxf-dev count in this vote unless they
vote in
this thread, no mater though as there are enough votes here now.
...ant
On Jan 26, 2008 5:56 PM, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a quick update
I'm not sure those votes on cxf-dev count in this vote unless they vote in
this thread, no mater though as there are enough votes here now.
...ant
On Jan 26, 2008 5:56 PM, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a quick update while the vote is open.
Jim Jagielski and Jeff
Looks ok to me, +1.
...ant
On Jan 25, 2008 9:42 PM, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We held a vote on cxf-dev to release a new version of CXF. This version
is pretty much just a big bug fix rollup compared to 2.0.3 fixing over
50 JIRA issues reported by users and bugs encountered
On Jan 24, 2008 9:39 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24/01/2008, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi sebb
Thank you for the detailed review.
Can you tell me what you mean by
On Jan 24, 2008 4:57 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 24/01/2008, ant elder [EMAIL
I think the NOTICE files in the artifacts that are actually being
distributed are OK. The ${pom.name} is changed by the build process so the
generated artifact has the proper name, for example, the jar built for
wsdl2java ends up with a NOTICE file containing Apache Tuscany SCA
WSDL2Java Tool, see
On Jan 14, 2008 3:29 PM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Simon Kitching wrote:
Is a project under incubation allowed to import its existing sources
(not under the Apache license) into the Apache svn? And after
graduation from the incubator, is it ok for the svn history to
Dear root,
Please create an id for Rajini Sivaram on the Tuscany project under
Incubation.
Preferred userid: rsivaram
Full name: Rajini Sivaram
Forwarding email address:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Requested Karma for: ws-tuscany
ICLA
Looks ok to me so +1. Was going to say the Incubator disclaimer is missing
in the artifacts but then found it in the README file, should probably move
that to a separate DISCLAIMER file for later releases.
...ant
On Dec 31, 2007 7:20 PM, Chris Mattmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Incubator
On Dec 17, 2007 5:44 PM, Thilo Goetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevan Miller wrote:
On Dec 17, 2007, at 4:09 AM, Thilo Goetz wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Marshall Schor wrote:
We've put the LICENSE, NOTICES, and DISCLAIMERs into the top
directory
of the source (and binary)
Dear root,
Please create an id for Mark Combellack on the Tuscany project under
Incubation.
Preferred userid:mcombellack
Full name: Mark Combellack
Forwarding email address:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Requested Karma for: ws-tuscany
ICLA is on
On Dec 15, 2007 9:21 PM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 15, 2007, at 1:43 PM, sebb wrote:
[Eventually found the KEYS file in SVN, but it might be helpful to
provide a pointer in the vote mails]
The NOTICE file in uimaj-2.2.1-incubating-bin.zip refers to the
On Dec 11, 2007 2:15 PM, Alexey Petrenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
2007/12/11, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Just to make sure I understand what is happening here - Yoko is going
away/ending and getting
merged into Geronimo and CXF?
Yes.
SY, Alexey
The proposal mentions continuing
On Dec 13, 2007 11:50 AM, Michael Baessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Apache UIMA committers ask the Apache Incubator PMC for
permission to publish a new bug fix release of Apache UIMA.
This release contains bug fixes of the Apache UIMA 2.2.0 release published
in
August 2007. For details
On Dec 5, 2007 3:57 AM, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 03 December 2007 23:09, Paul Fremantle wrote:
Here is my +1. Paul
+1,
With a note that IBM's contribution to the project *seems* to be a
worryingly
large proportion. I still vote +1 as I am convinced that the WS
On Nov 22, 2007 7:09 PM, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 20, 2007 9:14 PM, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I would agree with reviewing committers at graduation, but how do we
implement that?
I would say that this depends on the judgment of the mentors, and it
On Nov 16, 2007 2:10 PM, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 16, 2007, at 2:09 AM, Raymond Feng wrote:
Hi, Kevan.
Thank you for the review. We have fixed the issue and republished a
RC5a at:
SVN Tag:
On 10/31/07, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 30, 2007, at 11:58 PM, Matthieu Riou wrote:
there are at least 3 legally independent committers and there is no
single
company or entity that is vital to the success of the project
What does legally independent mean? Not paid
+1
...ant
On 10/29/07, Matthieu Riou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Following up on the proposal discussed at [1] I'd like to call for a vote
to
incubate Buildr. Buildr is a simple and intuitive build system for Java
projects written in Ruby (and based on Rake), please see the complete
On 10/19/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Fremantle wrote:
I think Tuscany is ready to graduate because:
1) I understand it to have met the base requirements of the IPMC in
terms
of
independent committers
Apparently a bare minimum, with very little active work from
On 10/20/07, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/20/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...This is the Tuscany community vote result thread which was only on
the
tuscany-dev list but seems to have inadvertently been replied to to the
general@ list
BTW
On 10/12/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Tuscany podling respectfully requests the Incubator to consider its
graduation to a Top Level Project.
While incubating Tuscany has made 14(!) releases, voted in 19 new
committers, survived conflicts, formed its PPMC, learned how to govern
On 10/21/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ant Elder wrote:
Apparently a bare minimum, with very little active work from
independents?
If the bare minimum is the 3 legally independent committers as defined
in
the Incubator policy documents then Tuscany has more than
On 10/19/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't use [RESULT] in a thread that is still on-going. There may
have been a result in the Tuscany PPMC, but there is no result yet from
the
Incubator PMC.
This is the Tuscany community vote result thread which was only on the
On 10/17/07, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I wonder if we could shorten this just a little. How about:
...establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation
and maintenance of open-source software for distribution at no charge
to the public, that simplifies the
On 10/13/07, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/13/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/13/07, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
So bringing together all the comments so far gives something like:
...establish a Project Management Committee
On 10/13/07, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/12/07, Mike Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
snip
On 10/12/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
2. grrr SOA! i'm unclear what this really means in this case. though
i've been
Dear root,
Please create an id for Amita Vadhavkar on the Tuscany project under
Incubation.
Preferred userid:amita
Full name:Amita Vadhavkar
Forwarding email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Requested Karma for:ws-tuscany
ICLA is on file.
Votes:
Andy Grove agrove at apache dot org
ant elder antelder at apache dot org
Brady Johnson bjohnson at apache dot org
Frank Budinsky frankb at apache dot org
Ignacio Silva-Lepe
Over in the Tuscany Incubator project we have been tidying up the loose ends
before we vote in the project community to ask the IPMC to recommend Tuscany
as top level project to the Apache Board.
We have been part of the incubator project for quite some time now and we
believe we have
On 10/2/07, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/2/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i'm thinking more of a benevolent educator than traffic warden
style reviewer role.
When it comes to legal issues related to a release, the warden role is
the
more
+1 from me.
I can't see any issues that haven't already been mentioned here or over on
tuscany-dev.
...ant
On 9/27/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Apache Tuscany project request IPMC permission to release the Java
DAS beta2 (1.0-incubating-beta2). The vote thread is here
On 9/28/07, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 28 September 2007 05:12, Yoav Shapira wrote:
Personally, that's my take on it, and what I've done historically.
I agree with Yoav, but would like to add that I personally have different
standards for different podlings, i.e.
-
On 9/28/07, Niclas Hedhman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 28 September 2007 16:16, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
IMHO the incubator PMC doesn't care much about technical issues in
podling releases, at least for early releases.
This is an important observation. The reviewers has no
On 9/28/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/28/07, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What we care about is that podlings get the legal stuff right, and
letting releases out without this being ok is not an option, due to
potential legal risks.
I thought projects
I'm not so sure any of these issues are serious enough to block the release
so I'm going still to give it a +1.
Most of the missing license headers are not in significant files and the top
level LICENSE is there in the distributions which is the main thing, and I
don't think
What are people thoughts on how strict reviews should be when saying an
issue is serious enough to block a podling release?
Current incubator release policy is described at:
http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html#Releases
Some things said there are:
No release made by a
+1.
...ant
On 9/22/07, Daniel Kulp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Due to some license issues pointed out from Kevan and Matthieu as well as
some TCK failures when run in Geronimo and the bouncycastle discussions,
we had to rebuild CXF 2.0.2.
Note: the main changes between this and the first
-- Forwarded message --
From: ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sep 25, 2007 10:45 AM
Subject: Account Request - Simon Nash - Tuscany (incubating)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear root,
Please create an id
Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 21, 2007, at 3:06 AM, ant elder wrote:
The Tuscany project requests permission of the IPMC to release the
Java SCA
1.0-incubating release.
The SVN tag for the release is:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany
On 9/21/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Tuscany project requests permission of the IPMC to release the Java SCA
1.0-incubating release.
The SVN tag for the release is:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.0-RC3a/
The artifacts are available
The Apache Tuscany team are delighted to announce the 1.0 release of
the Java SCA project.
Apache Tuscany provides a runtime environment based on the Service
Component Architecture (SCA). SCA is a set of specifications aimed at
simplifying SOA application development. These specifications are
The Tuscany project requests permission of the IPMC to release the Java SCA
1.0-incubating release.
The SVN tag for the release is:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.0-RC3a/
The artifacts are available for review at:
On 9/16/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I don't see a an unencumbered BouncyCastle distribution which is not
encumbered.
Is there any reason we can't just make one? The license seems ok for that:
http://www.bouncycastle.org/licence.html. Is it just the one class in the
On 9/15/07, Kevan Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 14, 2007, at 3:26 PM, Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi,
We are using Apache Rampart 1.3 to enable ws security into the ws-
binding-axis2 module for Apache Tuscany v1.0 which we hope to
release in a week. Using Rampart seems to bring
Passed with no -1s and 3 +1s from Davanum Srinivas, Paul Fremantle, and Ant
Elder (over on tuscany-dev).
...ant
On 8/28/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear IPMCers,
The Apache Tuscany project asks your permission to release the Tuscany
Java SCA 0.99-incubating release
The Apache Tuscany team are pleased to announce the 0.99-incubating
release of the Java SCA project.
Apache Tuscany provides a runtime based on the Service Component
Architecture. SCA is a set of specifications aimed at simplifying SOA
Application Development which are being standardized at OASIS
Dear IPMCers,
The Apache Tuscany project asks your permission to release the Tuscany Java
SCA 0.99-incubating release.
The tuscany-dev list vote for the release passed with 6 +1s and no -1s:
http://marc.info/?l=tuscany-devm=118829361008651w=2http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL
+1
...ant
On 8/13/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Apache Tuscany project request IPMC permission to release the Java
DAS beta1 (1.0-incubating-beta1). The vote thread is here ...
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg21549.html
Since this is a
+1
...ant
On 8/6/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Tuscany project requests permission of the IPMC to release the SDO
Java 1.0-incubating release. The vote thread is here ...
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg21169.html
Since this is a small delta on the
+1 from me.
Some of the same comments on the previous M7a release still apply, eg, its
preferred to have a separate DISCLAIMER file, having all licenses in a
single LICENSE file, and have src and binary distro's unpack into different
folders.
...ant
On 7/30/07, Graham Turrell (gmail) [EMAIL
On 7/31/07, Matthieu Riou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/31/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 from me.
Some of the same comments on the previous M7a release still apply, eg,
its
preferred to have a separate DISCLAIMER file, having all licenses in a
single LICENSE file
Looks ok to me now so +1.
...ant
On 7/18/07, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Robert,
Thanks for taking a look and posting your observations.
- The javadocs are not supposed to be there in the maven repo. They
seemed to have crept in by mistake. I have now deleted them.
- I
+1
...ant
On 7/20/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any other IPMC member wants to vote?
On 7/13/07, Guillaume Nodet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ServiceMix podling respectfully requests the Incubator to consider
its graduation to a Top Level Project. Please vote on
On 7/16/07, Xavier Hanin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We held a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to publish a second
alpha release of Ivy.
The vote email thread is available here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg01175.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00685.html
In
+1
...ant
On 7/12/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please can I make another appeal to IPMC members to consider the
referenced
vote for karma for Fuhwei and cast their binding votes. We have consensus
from the project itself, but we need the IPMC members binding votes
before
we
On 6/30/07, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The thread has died down with no consensus, so I'm going to try again.
Regarding how a Podling can get a new to Apache committer. First,
the rules:
1. Only the Incubator PMC can vote in a new committer, with three +1
and no -1 votes
Preferred userid: ... agrove
Full name:... Andrew Grove
Forwarding email address: ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Requested UNIX groups: ws-tuscany
CLA is on file.
Vote: http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg13754.html
Note, I believe I'm authorised to make this
On 6/7/07, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My apologies if I'm resurrecting something that was discussed extensively.
It has been pointed out to me that:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-57
The actual votes are held on the private lists. I'm not sure I
understand that.
The Apache Tuscany team are pleased to announce the 0.90-incubating release
of the Java SCA project.
Apache Tuscany provides a runtime based on the Service Component
Architecture. SCA is a set of specifications aimed at simplifying SOA
Application Development which are being standardized at
On 5/30/07, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carl Trieloff wrote:
One more question on this topic as I have also seen differing views from
different members of the Incubator PMC on: Who can and who can not
send the account setup mail to root?
The view that counts is from
After more than 72 hours this vote has passed with 3 +1s from:
Robert Burrell Donkin
Davanum Srinivas
Paul Fremantle
Thanks for voting,
...ant
On 5/29/07, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/27/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IPMCers, the Apache Tuscany project asks your permission to release the
Tuscany Java SCA 0.90-incubating release.
The tuscany-dev list vote for the release passed with 7 +1s:
http
IPMCers, the Apache Tuscany project asks your permission to release the
Tuscany Java SCA 0.90-incubating release.
The tuscany-dev list vote for the release passed with 7 +1s:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg18279.html
The artifacts, including the binary and source
We're still looking for a couple more votes on this, anyone got some time to
have a look?
...ant
On 5/2/07, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 from me
Paul
On 5/2/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Tuscany community held a vote to release Apache Tuscany SDO version
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 3/17/07, Davanum Srinivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Niclas,
Here the scenario is a project with all committers from one employer
and regular releases.
Are you talking about Tuscany still? Not all the Tuscany committers are from
the one employer. There's 25 committers
FWIW, on the incubating projects I've helped with AFAIR there's never been
anyone who complained the separate incubator repository was confusing or
caused any problems. Also, most of the time we build in offline mode so the
performance of the separate repository isn't really an issue.
There is
On 2/25/07, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 23, 2007, at 10:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rfeng
Date: Fri Feb 23 22:26:55 2007
New Revision: 511225
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=511225
Log:
[sca-integration-branch] Add EJB reference binding
Preferred userid: slaws
Full name: Simon Laws
Forwarding email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Requested Karma for: ws-tuscany
ICLA is on file
Result email and vote thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg13211.html
Many thanks,
...ant
What is the current recommended best practice for a podling to vote in a new
committer?
The Voting in a new committer section at
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html
it suggests a private discussion followed by a public pro-forma vote, and it
has a link to discussion thread about this
Attapattu
Asankha Perera
Tijs Rademakers
Ant Elder
Ruwan Linton
Saminda Aberuwan
Davanum Srinivas
Jaliya Ekanayake
Glen Daniels
The code is here:
http://people.apache.org/~pzf/synapse/0.90-RC1/
and has been tagged here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/synapse/tags/0.90RC1
On 11/3/06, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if I could draw your attention to this vote ratification
please?
Nobody has raised any show-stopping objections to any of the content. On
the
other hand, nobody has voted yet. I have been reading all the helpful
suggestions
401 - 500 of 507 matches
Mail list logo
