/2008, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Tuscany community had a vote to release SDO Java 1.1-incubatingrelease
candidate 2 [1] which was passed with 7+1s and no -1s.
Please vote to approve this release.
The distribution files are at [2]
Maven artifacts for the release
The Tuscany community had a vote to release SDO Java 1.1-incubating release
candidate 2 [1] which was passed with 7+1s and no -1s.
Please vote to approve this release.
The distribution files are at [2]
Maven artifacts for the release candidate are available at [3]
The tag for the release is at
that
there is a significant conflict.
Kelvin.
On 19/02/2008, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/02/2008, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
One topic from the tuscany-user discussion that's worth exposing here
is whether the NNY project would be a pure RI
On 19/02/2008, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
One topic from the tuscany-user discussion that's worth exposing here
is whether the NNY project would be a pure RI with no extensions
beyond the spec, or a vehicle for innovation to extend the specs, as
both Tuscany SCA and SDO have
on the relationship to Tuscany but I'm afraid
I came out more confused.
I'm sure there are more hard questions but I think that's enough to be
going on with.
Regards,
Paul
On Jan 31, 2008 9:47 AM, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NoNameYetProposal
That's
Hi all,
We've posted an Apache Incubator proposal onto the incubator wiki
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NoNameYetProposal
We haven't got a good name yet, SandStorm is a contender, as is Snowdon
Suggestions and comments welcome,
Kelvin.
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ThriftProposal
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NoNameYetProposal
That's what you get for employing reuse tactics -- gmail remembers the
original URL. I've been caught by this before, so I thought I had taken
appropriate action to avoid this behaviour, but sadly not so, apologies.
Kelvin
On 31/01/2008, kelvin
Looks good to me.
Kelvin.
On 18/10/2007, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/17/07, Simon Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I wonder if we could shorten this just a little. How about:
...establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation
and maintenance of
I filed a JIRA on the documentation for the maven assembly plugin for
this, http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-229, noting that the
requirement for a leading 0 in order to qualify the permissions
definition as being an octal number was inconsistent with the unix
chmod command. Since then I
The vote to release Apache Tuscany SDO 1.0-incubating has completed
with 5 +1 votes being cast (3 IPMC binding) and no -1s (see the
tuscany-dev list vote thread [1] and the incubator-general vote
approval thread [2]). Thank you for reviewing and voting.
I will therefore proceed with the
The Apache Tuscany team are pleased to announce the 1.0-incubating release
of the Java SDO project.
This project provides an implementation of the SDO 2.1 specification
[1] and this is our first release to provide full coverage of the
specification. In addition to completing the few remaining SDO
what the T is) and the samples run fine. Now that I have
run the samples as an ordinary I see the permissions as --wr-- and
the execution of the samples fails. I will look into a solution for
this now.
Kelvin.
On 31/07/07, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/29/07, kelvin
.
On 31/07/07, Robert Burrell Donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/29/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Tuscany project requests permission of the IPMC to release the SDO
Java 1.0-incubating release.
The tuscany-dev list vote passed with 5+1s (2 IPMC binding), see ref [0]
below
The Tuscany project requests permission of the IPMC to release the SDO
Java 1.0-incubating release.
The tuscany-dev list vote passed with 5+1s (2 IPMC binding), see ref [0] below
The release candidate RC3 for Tuscany Java SDO archive distribution
files are posted at [1]
The release audit tool
Please can I make another appeal to IPMC members to consider the referenced
vote for karma for Fuhwei and cast their binding votes. We have consensus
from the project itself, but we need the IPMC members binding votes before
we can proceed.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 03/07/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL
The new committers page [1] references the link that you show as the place
to go to check. It mentions that it is generated daily from the
iclas.txtfile, which I believe is the definitive document but has
limited access.
Kelvin.
[1] http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#newcommitter
On 09/07/07,
Could I bring this notification of a vote to the attention of the IPMC
please. We have 11 +1s, no -1s but only one IPMC binding vote. We need a
couple more IPMC+1s to take this through please.
Regards,Kelvin.
On 27/06/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tuscany is having a vote
Tuscany is having a vote to give Committer status to Fuhwei Lwo on the
tuscany-dev list [1]. We invite IPMC members to cast their binding votes.
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg19275.html
Regards, Kelvin Goodson.
How can an Apache project robustly handle the situation where 3rd
party dependencies don't provide maven binary artifacts? In
particular, when an Apache release is made, we need to be sure that
the 3rd party dependencies are available for as long as the release is
available.
Regards, Kelvin.
,
Guillaume Nodet
kelvin goodson wrote:
How can an Apache project robustly handle the situation where 3rd
party dependencies don't provide maven binary artifacts? In
particular, when an Apache release is made, we need to be sure that
the 3rd party dependencies are available for as long
Hi,
I tried to announce the 1.0-incubating-beta1 release of Tuscany's SDO
Java earlier in the week [1], but I haven't seen it appear on the announce
mailing list archive, or pop up in my newsfeed reader. I did send it from
my apache.org email address; are there any other gotchas? I
Jukka,
thanks, I have reposted the note in plain text format
Kelvin.
On 18/05/07, Jukka Zitting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On 5/18/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried to announce the 1.0-incubating-beta1 release of Tuscany's SDO
Java earlier in the week [1], but I
for every release. I've created a possible patch for
this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1284
Otherwise looks good to me.
Niall
On 5/2/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Tuscany community held a vote to release Apache Tuscany SDO version
1.0-incubating-beta; see ref [0
Thanks guys, but were still looking for one more vote, since Paul's 2 +1s
won't carry it I think ;-)
Kelvin.
On 11/05/07, Paul Fremantle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 from me.
Paul
On 5/2/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Tuscany community held a vote to release Apache
The Tuscany community held a vote to release Apache Tuscany SDO version
1.0-incubating-beta; see ref [0] below.
Please vote to ratify this release.
The release candidate RC1 for Tuscany Java SDO beta1 archive distribution
files are posted at [1]
The maven repository artifacts are posted in a
Many thanks for your prompt attention. So now we have 15+1s, 1 non binding,
3 IPMC binding and no -1s I think we can confidently declare this vote
closed.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 01/05/07, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/1/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
repo is a special case. If so it would mean that the difficulties of moving
artifacts from a staged repo to the real repo would be circumvented.
Kelvin.
On 23/04/07, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/23/07, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had some recent comments
Upayavira,
OK, thanks for the clarification.
Kelvin.
On 24/04/07, Upayavira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
kelvin goodson wrote:
Robert, thanks for that. Can I just clarify something please. I may be
mistaken but I thought I had understood that the incubator repo is not
mirrored anywhere
I had some recent comments on a release candidate I posted for
consideration/voting [1].
In particular the comment ...
- There are no SDO artifact jars to review, are the SDO jars going to be
installed to the Apache maven repository?
I want to post my release artifacts to the incubator repo but
I think I should perhaps have asked the attached question here ...
-- Forwarded message --
From: kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 16-Mar-2007 16:44
Subject: New dependency on GroboUtils, and hence MIT license
To: tuscany-dev tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
http
I'd really like to update the Tuscany JIRA environment to have a patch
available column (similar to Geronimo's here --
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=10220status=1)
but have no idea how to do it.
Can anyone point to me some infor please?
Regards, Kelvin.
/jira/docs/v3.7.2/navigatorviews.html?clicked=jirahelp
scroll down to Customizing your Issue Navigator columns
-Marshall Schor
kelvin goodson wrote:
I'd really like to update the Tuscany JIRA environment to have a patch
available column (similar to Geronimo's here --
http://issues.apache.org/jira
on your post. Thus, I'm returning it to you.
If you feel that this is in error, please repost the message
or contact a list moderator directly.
but I don't know who the moderators are. Can someone help please?
Regards, Kelvin Goodson.
The Apache Tuscany community is pleased to announce its Milestone 2 release
of SDO (Service Data Objects).
You can download binary and source distributions from:
http://incubator.apache.org/tuscany/downloads.html
For further information, visit our web site at:
Passed with +1 votes from rubys, farra and davanum and no -1s.
Thanks to all for reviewing and commenting.
Kelvin.
On 06/11/06, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand it is good practice to restart a vote if the vote thread
becomes heavy with discussion. This is the case
be widely available. I'm a novice in this field. I have now
uploaded the key to pgp.mit.edo and I see
C:\ gpg --search-keys goodson
gpg: searching for goodson from hkp server pgp.mit.edu
(1) Kelvin Goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1024 bit DSA key 96324791, created: 2006-10-17
Regards
further
activity on my part please?
Best Regards, Kelvin.
On 01/11/06, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert, thanks for your comments.
I believe the tag issue is now resolved, by earlier notes on this thread.
(http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200610.mbox/[EMAIL
Can anyone tell me if it's OK to put code into a sandbox that has been
attached to a JIRA without granting ASF license?
Thanks
not find any.
TTFN,
-bd-
[1] http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html
[2] http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html#labeling
On Oct 25, 2006, at 11:09 AM, kelvin goodson wrote:
The Tuscany PPMC has voted to release the SDO for Java API
implementation as
part of the M2 release
the file to the JIRA, this
time with the checkbox ticked? That's the best way to handle it.
Craig
On Nov 1, 2006, at 6:47 AM, kelvin goodson wrote:
Can anyone tell me if it's OK to put code into a sandbox that has been
attached to a JIRA without granting ASF license?
Thanks
Craig Russell
/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/25/06, kelvin goodson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Tuscany PPMC has voted to release the SDO for Java API
implementation as
part of the M2 release.
In accordance with Incubator release procedures we are asking the
Incubator
PMC
README file added at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/README.txt
Regards, Kelvin.
On 28/10/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/28/06, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just trying to help, the SDO tag is available here :
thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg10046.html
Regards, Kelvin Goodson.
**
43 matches
Mail list logo
