Re: Two issues with license and notice auditing

On 2 March 2018 at 04:28, Carlos Santana wrote: > Forwarding to Incubator mailing list to see if they any guidance. > > -- Forwarded message - > From: Ying Chun Guo > Date: Thu, Mar 1, 2018 at 10:27 PM > Subject: Two issues with license

Deleting older releases (was: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0 release RC0)

On 5 February 2018 at 23:40, Haibin Lin <haibin.lin@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Sebb, > > Thanks for the suggestion. I've updated the release process wiki at > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MXNET/Release+Process#ReleaseProcess-3.7.CleanupolderreleasesonA

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0 release RC0

On 5 February 2018 at 22:51, Haibin Lin <haibin.lin@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Sebb, > > I've deleted the older releases and will remove 1.0.0 after 1.1.0 is > officially announced. OK, thanks. Please also update any release process docs to ensure tidyup takes place after ever

Re: [VOTE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0 release RC0

On 31 January 2018 at 21:48, Haibin Lin wrote: > Hello all, > > This is a call for a releasing Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.1.0, release > candidate 0. Reminder: please delete old releases from the ASF mirrors. It's not fair to expect volunteer mirrors to carry them.

Re: [PROPOSAL] Dubbo - proposal for Apache Incubation

On 5 February 2018 at 11:01, Ian Luo wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Considering today's large Dubbo users, I think we'd better separate the > mailing lists from the very beginning, so that everyone can be benefit > since in this way we could use dev to discuss product bugs/features, and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hivemall (Incubating) v0.5.0-RC2

On 30 January 2018 at 03:02, Makoto Yui wrote: > Justin, > > 2018-01-30 11:33 GMT+09:00 Justin Mclean : >> You should be careful following other TLPs as examples and follow the >> instructions here. [1] If you want some good example that the HTTP project >>

Re: [PROPOSAL] Onyx - proposal for Apache Incubation

A brief search for 'Surf Software' shows quite a few hits. I have not looked to see if they would be likely to be confused with this project or cause problems for others. But it as though there might be a problem: Surfer - Golden Software surf @ sourceforge Surf Software company On 27 January

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Apache Traffic Control 2.1.0 (Incubating)

On 22 January 2018 at 14:48, Hank Beatty wrote: > The Apache Traffic Control team is proud to announce the release of Apache > Traffic Control 2.1.0 (incubating). > > More details regarding Apache Traffic Control can be found at: > > http://trafficcontrol.incubator.apache.org/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control (incubating) 2.1.0-RC3

AFAIK the normal way to announce this is to send a message with the subject starting: [RESULT][VOTE] ... Also the votes should be tallied. See for example: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/95689e3c01a601a6c5ff8873785d8728c2eb2f95b040a9fbcb159d7f@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E On 19

Re: [VOTE] Apache AriaTosca Release 0.2.0

uot; in its Python package name. > > I think it's time we had some clarity here regarding policy and apply it to > all projects. AriaTosca would of course comply with whatever is decided. > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 6:44 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 10 January

Re: [VOTE] Apache AriaTosca Release 0.2.0

On 10 January 2018 at 17:10, Tal Liron wrote: > John, the line is relevant. The service template in question is used to > install and deploy Clearwater IMS. The NOTICE and LICENSE files are ONLY for files that are actually included in the release archive. > I believe users

Re: ratis website proposal

On 4 January 2018 at 01:04, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > You may want to change the wording under the Source link as you have develop > is master it could be seen as you are distributing unofficial code to users > there. > > Just add some words to the effect that

Re: ratis website proposal

On 2 January 2018 at 17:35, Elek, Marton wrote: > > Hi, > > We created an initial version of the Ratis website. And currently there is a > vote[1] thread on the ratis dev mailing list to publish it. > > This is not a release, but we would like to get as many feedback as >

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 1.9.0

g (and/or 1.8.1-incubating) has stopped > (because superseded by 1.8.2-incubating), please remove it from > /dist/release/incubator/airflow/. > > Done. > >> The dist.apache.org URL is not for use by the general public; it is only > intended as the staging area for Airflow devel

Re: [VOTE] Release Airflow 1.9.0

On 18 December 2017 at 20:32, Chris Riccomini wrote: > Hello Incubator PMC’ers, > > The Apache Airflow community has voted and approved the proposal to release > Apache Airflow 1.9.0 (incubating) based on 1.9.0 Release Candidate 8. We > now kindly request the Incubator PMC

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Eggent 1.2.0-incubating

On 11 December 2017 at 22:28, Dale LaBossiere <dml.apa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Sebb, > > Is there a incubation policy on NOTICE content? e.g., I noticed that > ponytail’s NOTICE has “(incubating)” in its first line (“Apache Pony Mail > (Incubating)”. Is that change

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Eggent 1.2.0-incubating

So, I removed the LICENSE file and here’s the revision to vote on: 23497 > > > Chris > > > Am 11.12.17, 12:50 schrieb "sebb" <seb...@gmail.com>: > > On 11 December 2017 at 11:33, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > wrote: > &g

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Eggent 1.2.0-incubating

for review. Further, the previous release [2] has a different source LICENSE from RC1. Is that correct? > I’ll post the revision as soon as above have been addresses. > > Chris > > > > > Am 11.12.17, 12:07 schrieb "sebb" <seb...@gmail.com>: > &

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Eggend 1.2.0-incubating

On 11 December 2017 at 11:27, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > >> The LICENSE file is not normally published separately from the archives. >> In any case, it must be accompanied by the NOTICE file. > > The LICENSE and NOTICE are included in the source zip so IMO not an

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Eggend 1.2.0-incubating

The mail subject is wrong. On 11 December 2017 at 09:39, Christofer Dutz wrote: > The Apache Edgent community approved a vote to release > Apache Edgent 1.2.0-incubating from RC1. > > Per [1] we are requesting IPMC approval to publish the > release bundles on the

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache BatchEE 0.5-incubating

On 10 December 2017 at 19:54, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> wrote: > > >> Am 10.12.2017 um 13:30 schrieb sebb <seb...@gmail.com>: >> >>> >>> And one more drawback is that ditching a failed release from SVN will _not_ >&g

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache BatchEE 0.5-incubating

at is planned to be released to the ASF mirror system. Wheres the parent dir for the source archive (*) includes files that won't be published. (*) https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebatchee-1005/org/apache/batchee/batchee/0.5-incubating/ > Is this documented in the incubat

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control (incubating) 2.1.0-RC2

On 7 December 2017 at 16:16, Hank Beatty <hbea...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 12/05/2017 06:31 PM, sebb wrote: >> >> On 5 December 2017 at 16:49, Hank Beatty <hbea...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hello Incubator PMC, >>> >&g

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache BatchEE 0.5-incubating

On 7 December 2017 at 10:22, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> wrote: > Hi Sebb! > > commits got pushed to the ASF repo > https://github.com/apache/incubator-batchee/commits/master > > And we clarified the dist question with Infra. > All is fine as reposit

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache BatchEE 0.5-incubating

On 6 December 2017 at 17:06, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> wrote: > No sebb, the tag does NOT need to be owned by the PPMC. > We just have to make sure that the tag gets moved over to ASF _AFTER_ the > vote is closed. > That's how GIT works and that's how we work w

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache BatchEE 0.5-incubating

On 6 December 2017 at 08:08, Reinhard Sandtner wrote: > Hey incubator PMCs, > > The Apache BatchEE community has voted and approved the proposal to release > Apache BatchEE 0.5-incubating. > Apache BatchEE is a JBatch implementation (JSR-352) which provides many >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control (incubating) 2.1.0-RC2

On 5 December 2017 at 16:49, Hank Beatty wrote: > Hello Incubator PMC, > > The Apache Traffic Control community has voted on and approved a > proposal to release Apache Traffic Control 2.1.0-incubating. We now > kindly request that the Incubator PMC members review and vote on

Re: Podling user@ lists (was: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation)

On 1 December 2017 at 18:57, Mike Jumper <mike.jum...@guac-dev.org> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 10:06 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 1 December 2017 at 13:52, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: >> > ... >> > >> &

Re: Podling user@ lists (was: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation)

On 1 December 2017 at 13:52, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 7:54 AM Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 3:51 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > On 29 November 2017 at 13:44, J

Podling user@ lists (was: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation)

On 29 November 2017 at 13:44, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 5:59 AM sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Top posting >> >> The proposal includes a user@ mailing list. >> This is generally not recommended for podlings

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Griffin-0.1.6-incubating released

On 29 November 2017 at 01:28, William Guo wrote: > Hi all, > > > The Apache Griffin (incubating) team is pleased to announce the release of > Griffin 0.1.6-incubating. > > > Apache Griffin is data quality solution for modern data system, > it defines a standard process to

Re: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation

Top posting The proposal includes a user@ mailing list. This is generally not recommended for podlings as their focus needs to be on building the developer community. Once a podling graduates, the user@ list can be created, and any external user mailing list subscribers can migrate across. This

Re: [DISCUSS] Resolution to graduate the incubating Apache Trafodion Project

On 26 November 2017 at 00:02, Craig Russell wrote: > Hi Pierre, > > I'm afraid you might have missed the point of sebb's comment. I'll try to > restate it. The resolution prologue should be much simpler: > > Establish the Apache Trafodion Project > > WHEREAS, the Board of

Re: [DISCUSS] Resolution to graduate the incubating Apache Trafodion Project

On 20 November 2017 at 21:32, Pierre Smits wrote: > The community of the incubating Apache Trafodion Project has discussed and > voted on graduating from incubating. Following instructions from the > graduation guide, this thread is for discussion. > > The thread of the

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5.1 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

On 20 November 2017 at 08:27, Jaroslav Tulach <jaroslav.tul...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2017-11-19 23:04 GMT+01:00 sebb <seb...@gmail.com>: > >> On 19 November 2017 at 16:52, Jaroslav Tulach <jaroslav.tul...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > 18. 11. 2017 v 21:46,

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5.1 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

On 19 November 2017 at 16:52, Jaroslav Tulach <jaroslav.tul...@gmail.com> wrote: > 18. 11. 2017 v 21:46, sebb <seb...@gmail.com>: > >> BTW, I've just noticed that the vote mail does not include a link to >> the source tag. > > True, I've added the tag yesterday

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5.1 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

BTW, I've just noticed that the vote mail does not include a link to the source tag. So I don't know how anyone can have checked the contents of the source archive against the code repo. On 18 November 2017 at 20:41, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 18 November 2017 at 18:28, Jarosl

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5.1 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

On 18 November 2017 at 18:28, Jaroslav Tulach <jaroslav.tul...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2017-11-17 22:59 GMT+01:00 sebb <seb...@gmail.com>: > >> On 17 November 2017 at 21:13, Jaroslav Tulach <jaroslav.tul...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > 17. 11. 2017 v 12:4

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5.1 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

On 17 November 2017 at 21:13, Jaroslav Tulach <jaroslav.tul...@gmail.com> wrote: > 17. 11. 2017 v 12:48, sebb <seb...@gmail.com>: > >>> On 16 November 2017 at 22:19, Jaroslav Tulach <jaroslav.tul...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> 72h is gone an

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.12.1 Release

On 17 November 2017 at 17:28, Chris Olivier wrote: > Hello All, > > > > The Apache MXNet (incubating) Community announces the availability of > Apache MXNet (incubating) 0.12.1! > > > > Apache MXNet (incubating) is a deep learning framework designed for both > efficiency

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5.1 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

On 16 November 2017 at 22:19, Jaroslav Tulach wrote: > 72h is gone and (I think) we still need one more vote. C'mon it's a formality > (version 1.5.1 is better than 1.5 and 1.5 was approved). Somebody please help > us move on. Sorry to interrupt, but release approval

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating released

On 16 November 2017 at 07:25, Johnu George wrote: > The Apache Mnemonic community is pleased to announce the release of > Apache Mnemonic-0.10.0-incubating. > > Apache Mnemonic is an advanced hybrid memory storage oriented library, > it's proposed a non-volatile/durable Java

Re: Graduation: who mails the board?

Unless the agenda is updated, the board cannot vote on the resolution. But does the full resolution really need to be posted to the board list as well? The change to the agenda will be posted to the board commits list anyway. On 12 November 2017 at 12:29, John D. Ament

Re: Update README for retired podlings?

On 2 November 2017 at 21:07, Dave Fisher wrote: > Actually when the podling is retired the SVN and or GIT must be deleted. It’s > mean, but if people cared they could have contributed and kept it going. Huh? The website is deleted, but AFAIK SVN/Git is just made

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

On 22 October 2017 at 17:53, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid> wrote: > Hmm, well, but that usually only happens if it is clear that the vote should > get cancelled. Isn't that what I wrote? > LieGrue, > strub > >> Am 22.10.2017 um 15:29 schrieb sebb <

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

On 21 October 2017 at 18:27, Mark Struberg wrote: >> Even though there is no >> veto vote on releases, if someone raised a valid issue, the group might >> postpone a release as well, even after +1s. > > > Yes indeed. Sometimes a single person discovers a problem during

Re: [VOTE] Graduate the Apache PredictionIO podling from Incubator to a TLP

On 6 October 2017 at 00:38, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > If I had to guess, the items missing are all in > https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#navigation - not sure if Sebb > sees something else missing. Yes, for example: https://www.apache.org/founda

Podling websites not meeting ASF requirements

It looks like podlings don't always grok the requirements for ASF websites: https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#navigation etc Nor are the download requirements always clearly understood. ISTM that maybe the docs need to be updated to point to the appropriate requirements.

Re: [VOTE] Graduate the Apache PredictionIO podling from Incubator to a TLP

The website looks nice, but does not meet some of the requirements: https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs#navigation Also the download page should mention how to find the KEYS file and how to use sigs and hashes to check downloads. See for example:

Re: [DISCUSSION] Apache DataFu podling graduation

On 3 October 2017 at 21:45, Matthew Hayes wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to kick off a discussion regarding Apache DataFu's graduation > from incubator. In the community vote >

Re: Planning to remove rosters from active podlings

Note that Whimsy detects changes to the JSON files it generates and sends them to notifications@whimsical.a.o Since these are just diffs of the JSON files, it's not always immediately obvious what group name is involved. On 26 September 2017 at 01:46, Greg Stein wrote: > PPMC

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Mnemonic-0.9.0-incubating [rc2]

Same comments as for the Impala release (I'm reading mails backwards): The summary is easy to read, but has no context. Ideally the result mail should either form part of the VOTE thread (reply and prefix the subject with [RESULT]) or should contain a link to the vote thread. Please could you

Re: [RESULT] Vote on Impala 2.10.0 release candidate 2

The summary is easy to read, but has no context. Ideally the result mail should either form part of the VOTE thread (reply and prefix the subject with [RESULT]) or should contain a link to the vote thread. Please could you consider addressing this for the next vote result? Thanks. Just my 2p

Re: Digests in releases

On 30 August 2017 at 22:08, Julian Hyde wrote: > What is the correct forum for discussing release distribution policy? > > Current policy [1] states: > > Every artifact distributed to the public through Apache channels MUST > be accompanied by one file containing an OpenPGP

Re: Updating ip-clearance web site

On 7 August 2017 at 00:14, Craig Russell wrote: > Hi John, > > Thanks for clarifying. > > I would like to confirm that ip-clearance web site is generated from three > source documents in two repositories: > > git https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator.git > >

Re: Urgent: Regarding Java package name change to org.apache.*

On 4 August 2017 at 12:17, Shane Curcuru wrote: > Andy Seaborne wrote on 8/4/17 5:00 AM: >> On 03/08/17 23:20, John D. Ament wrote: >>> Which must's do you see greg? >>> >>> On Aug 3, 2017 1:09 PM, "Greg Trasuk" wrote: >>> Does this actually

Does Heron really need a users@ mailing list?

Podlings normally don't need a users@ list as the focus should be on building developer community. Is it really needed for Heron? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands,

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-201) Missing archiver/archives for dev@incubator - is it needed?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16106664#comment-16106664 ] Sebb commented on INCUBATOR-201: No point assigning this to me; I don't make the decision. > Miss

[jira] [Assigned] (INCUBATOR-201) Missing archiver/archives for dev@incubator - is it needed?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sebb reassigned INCUBATOR-201: -- Assignee: (was: Sebb) > Missing archiver/archives for dev@incubator - is it nee

Re: [NOTICE] Migrating to the new Incubator Website Wednesday night

On 17 July 2017 at 02:54, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 7:34 PM sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 16 July 2017 at 23:25, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: >> > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 5:32 PM sebb <

Re: Mainlinglist archive down?

Note that http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ is working again (*) That is currently the only official archive URL for public ASF lists. Any problems with it in future please report to Infra. (*) It looks like there was an issue creating the index page (I think this was probably caused

Re: [NOTICE] Migrating to the new Incubator Website Wednesday night

On 17 July 2017 at 00:34, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 16 July 2017 at 23:25, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 5:32 PM sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 16 July 2017 at 21:22, John D. Ament

Re: [NOTICE] Migrating to the new Incubator Website Wednesday night

On 16 July 2017 at 23:25, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 5:32 PM sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 16 July 2017 at 21:22, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: >> > Sebb, >> > >> > I

Re: [NOTICE] Migrating to the new Incubator Website Wednesday night

On 16 July 2017 at 21:22, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > Sebb, > > I have no particular issue with including the file, and I'm not sure why > you think I or anyone else would. This is not the canonical path for > podlings.xml though, and may be out of dat

Re: [NOTICE] Migrating to the new Incubator Website Wednesday night

tor/moderators.cgi > (though > the link in the README is wrong) > > John > > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 4:49 AM sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The podlings.xml file used to be available from >> >> http://incubator.apache.org/podlings.xml >>

Re: [NOTICE] Migrating to the new Incubator Website Wednesday night

mv $SVN_BUILD_DIR/clutch $WORKDIR +cp content/podlings.* $WORKDIR ) But I don't have karma to push the change. On 16 July 2017 at 09:49, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > The podlings.xml file used to be available from > > http://incubator.apache.org/podlings.xml > >

Re: [NOTICE] Migrating to the new Incubator Website Wednesday night

The podlings.xml file used to be available from http://incubator.apache.org/podlings.xml Also the related .dtd and .xsl were there. These URLs need to be restored as 3rd parties (such as Whimsy) use them. On 13 July 2017 at 02:50, John D. Ament wrote: > All, > > The

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Fluo Recipes 1.1.0-incubating released

What is the project about? Why should I be interested in it? [rhetorical questions] The Announce emails are sent to people not on the developer or user lists. Most will have no idea what the project is about. So the e-mails should contain at least brief details of what the product does, and some

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Juneau 6.3.0-incubating-RC1

On 28 June 2017 at 00:52, James Bognar wrote: > Quick reminder that we are passed the deadline and only have +2 binding > votes. By the way, 72 hours is *not* a deadline; it is a *minimum* period to allow time for voting. > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 12:04 PM,

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrating to the New Incubator Website

On 17 June 2017 at 21:42, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 8:53 AM sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 17 June 2017 at 13:35, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: >> > All, >> > >> > I'd lik

Re: [DISCUSS] Migrating to the New Incubator Website

On 17 June 2017 at 13:35, John D. Ament wrote: > All, > > I'd like to start the process to move forward on a new incubator website. > Based on discussions in the past on list, I wanted to do the following: I missed those, so some of my comments may be unnecessary ... > -

Re: Updating PPMC rosters via whimsy

On 11 June 2017 at 12:58, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 11, 2017 at 5:58 AM sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 11 June 2017 at 00:18, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: >> > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Sam

Re: Updating PPMC rosters via whimsy

On 11 June 2017 at 00:18, Sam Ruby wrote: > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 6:10 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: >> >> For that reason, I'd like to make a simplifying assumption: that all mentors >> are PPMC members, and all PPMC members are committers. > > Existing

Re: [DRAFT] What the new Status info looks like

On 10 June 2017 at 20:21, John D. Ament wrote: > On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 12:27 PM Ted Dunning wrote: > >> One more thought is that it would be nice to be able to see when the >> different committers, mentors and such were added to the project. The

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Atlas Project from Incubator

On 8 June 2017 at 01:03, Suma Shivaprasad <sumasai.shivapra...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sebb, > > The 0.8-incubating has major product updates and there are users still > using 0.7 major release. We need to provide the latest maint version and > upgrade path for the 0.7 rele

[jira] [Reopened] (INCUBATOR-201) Missing archiver/archives for dev@incubator - is it needed?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sebb reopened INCUBATOR-201: Incubator needs to decide ... > Missing archiver/archives for dev@incubator - is it nee

[jira] [Updated] (INCUBATOR-201) Missing archiver/archives for dev@incubator - is it needed?

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-201?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sebb updated INCUBATOR-201: --- INFRA-Members: (was: [infrastructure-team]) Component/s: (was: Mail Archives

Re: [VOTE] Apache Fluo 1.1.0-incubating (rc1)

On 7 June 2017 at 23:36, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 5:28 PM sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 7 June 2017 at 01:59, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: >> > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 6:47 PM sebb <seb...@g

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Atlas Project from Incubator

/ so it's clearly not a current release. > Suma > > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 3:11 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 6 June 2017 at 21:06, Suma Shivaprasad <suma...@apache.org> wrote: >> > Dear Incubator members, >> > >> > Following th

Re: [VOTE] Apache Fluo 1.1.0-incubating (rc1)

On 7 June 2017 at 01:59, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 6:47 PM sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 6 June 2017 at 23:38, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: >> > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 6:29 PM sebb <seb...@g

Re: [VOTE] Apache Fluo 1.1.0-incubating (rc1)

On 6 June 2017 at 23:38, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 6:29 PM sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 6 June 2017 at 23:25, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: >> > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 6:03 PM sebb <seb...@g

Re: [VOTE] Apache Fluo 1.1.0-incubating (rc1)

On 6 June 2017 at 23:25, Christopher <ctubb...@apache.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 6:03 PM sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 6 June 2017 at 21:15, Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com> wrote: >> > Dear IPMC, >> > >> > Please vote for

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Atlas Project from Incubator

On 6 June 2017 at 21:06, Suma Shivaprasad wrote: > Dear Incubator members, > > Following the discussion in Atlas community on graduating Apache Atlas from > incubation to a Top Level Project, starting this voting thread within > the incubator > community. Apache Atlas entered

Re: [VOTE] Apache Fluo 1.1.0-incubating (rc1)

On 6 June 2017 at 21:15, Keith Turner wrote: > Dear IPMC, > > Please vote for the following release candidate of Apache Fluo > 1.1.0-incubating. > > PPMC vote thread: >

Re: Contents of Podling Status Tracking

On 6 June 2017 at 04:22, John D. Ament wrote: > As a follow up to my prior question, ( > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/31119aafbc4260720d222666f3efd01f2fe2975e424039ea539c9cb6@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E > ). > Looking at our current tracking file for

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.1-incubating (RC0)

ed and not before. The previous (approved) release artifacts > are at that location. OK, that's a relief. Is there a copy of the proposed download page? It would be useful to link to that. > -dan > > > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 3:49 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.1-incubating (RC0)

On 5 June 2017 at 22:12, Dan Kirkwood wrote: DROPPED user@ list - see below. > Hello Incubator PMC, > > The Apache Traffic Control community has voted on and approved a > proposal to release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.1-incubating. We now > kindly request that the Incubator

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Mynewt from podling to TLP

On 2 June 2017 at 17:10, aditi hilbert <ad...@runtime.io> wrote: > Sebb, > > Thanks for catching the errors! Not sure what happened exactly but parts of > the text reverted back to another resolution we were using as a base > template. We have fixed the project

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Mynewt from podling to TLP

On 31 May 2017 at 16:09, aditi hilbert wrote: > Hi, > > The Apache Mynewt podling just passed the vote within its community to > graduate it to a Top Level Project. > An informational note was sent out earlier about the vote going on and it was > pointed out that the status

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tephra-0.12.0-incubating [rc1]

Please remember to delete the superseded releases from https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/tephra/ AFAICT, all the existing releases under that directory can be deleted once 0.12.0 has been released and announced (by which time it should be on the mirrors) In fact all but

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache MADlib podling graduation

Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > wrote: > >> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 3:27 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On 23 May 2017 at 07:24, Roman Shaposhnik <r...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> >> >> with my mentor hat on, I w

Re: private list subscriptions

On 22 May 2017 at 21:40, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: >> >>> On May 22, 2017, at 12:43 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Whimsy auto-sub

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache MADlib podling graduation

On 23 May 2017 at 07:24, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > Hi! > > with my mentor hat on, I wanted to kick off this discussion > thread on the basis of a general consensus in the MADlib > community that it is time for the project to consider a TLP > status:

Re: private list subscriptions

On 22 May 2017 at 12:58, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I don't think it matters... People use their @a.o emails for > various reasons, as well as NOT use them for various reasons. > I don't think we should 2nd guess or, even worse, intrude on > people's ind. email practices, IMO. > >>

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-198) clean up archive.a.o

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-198?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16019365#comment-16019365 ] Sebb commented on INCUBATOR-198: It does not seem right to delete any archives that were correctly

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-130) Nuvem in limbo

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16019350#comment-16019350 ] Sebb commented on INCUBATOR-130: Tuscany has since moved to the Attic > Nuvem in li

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-127) Project name still shows as Apache Argus - It should be Apache Ranger.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-127?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16019347#comment-16019347 ] Sebb commented on INCUBATOR-127: Podling has graduated - it looks as though the renames were done

[jira] [Commented] (INCUBATOR-128) Wrong email address in sample PPMC invitation email

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-128?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16019341#comment-16019341 ] Sebb commented on INCUBATOR-128: This has been fixed; the issue can be closed > Wrong email addr

[jira] [Created] (INCUBATOR-199) Extend podlings.xml to include old names and TLP parent

Sebb created INCUBATOR-199: -- Summary: Extend podlings.xml to include old names and TLP parent Key: INCUBATOR-199 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-199 Project: Incubator Issue

Re: Preferred name for package distributions

On 26 April 2016 at 13:25, Shane Curcuru wrote: > (bcc: trademarks@ so we can document recommendation at stable URL) > > Thanks for the commentary and excellent pulling together of different > information to on this question! > > The details of trademarks are more

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >