Re: [VOTE] Release of Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3

2011-11-28 Thread ant elder
! -P Sent from my Windows Phone From: Benson Margulies Sent: 11/25/2011 11:56 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3 Well, fine, I am happy to +1. On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Alan D. Cabrera

RE: [VOTE] Release of Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3

2011-11-27 Thread Prescott Nasser
Hi all, We could use another vote or two, Thanks! -P Sent from my Windows Phone From: Benson Margulies Sent: 11/25/2011 11:56 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release of Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3 Well, fine, I am happy to +1

Re: [VOTE] Release of Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3

2011-11-26 Thread ant elder
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org wrote: Can anybody please point me to the result of the conversation that defines our current understanding of what goes into NOTICE and what doesn't so I don't give bad advice to podlings?  I'm pretty sure this must have

Re: [VOTE] Release of Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3

2011-11-25 Thread Benson Margulies
I hate to have to say this, but I have concerns about the NOTICE file based on recent traffic here. Unfortunately, that conversation left me with a giant headache and no clear idea. The issue is that there's a misc acknowledgement in there which is not a relocated IP notice. Are those OK, or not?

Re: [VOTE] Release of Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3

2011-11-25 Thread ant elder
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: I hate to have to say this, but I have concerns about the NOTICE file based on recent traffic here. LOL Unfortunately, that conversation left me with a giant headache and no clear idea. The issue is that there's

Re: [VOTE] Release of Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3

2011-11-25 Thread Alan D. Cabrera
On Nov 25, 2011, at 8:32 AM, ant elder wrote: On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: I hate to have to say this, but I have concerns about the NOTICE file based on recent traffic here. LOL Unfortunately, that conversation left me with a giant

Re: [VOTE] Release of Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3

2011-11-25 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 10:53:43AM -0800, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: I think that some votes on this list are overly critical, often laden with personal opinions and not real Foundation requirements. This leads to a very frustrating experience to new podling members who are unable to tell the

Re: [VOTE] Release of Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3

2011-11-25 Thread Benson Margulies
Well, fine, I am happy to +1. On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote: On Nov 25, 2011, at 8:32 AM, ant elder wrote: On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: I hate to have to say this, but I have concerns about the

Re: [VOTE] Release of Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3

2011-11-25 Thread ant elder
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: Not as frustrating as putting up a release candidate which twists in the wind for weeks waiting for a IPMC member to review because Mentors are awol!  The few individuals who do this thankless work on a regular

Re: [VOTE] Release of Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3

2011-11-25 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 08:18:49PM +, ant elder wrote: On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote: Not as frustrating as putting up a release candidate which twists in the wind for weeks waiting for a IPMC member to review because Mentors are awol!  

Re: [VOTE] Release of Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3

2011-11-25 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-11-25, Benson Margulies wrote: I hate to have to say this, but I have concerns about the NOTICE file based on recent traffic here. If anything this is a case of ask and get three different answers as the Lucene.NET community added the stuff to the NOTICE file because I as a mentor told

Re: [VOTE] Release of Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3

2011-11-25 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-11-25, ant elder wrote: On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote: The issue is that there's a misc acknowledgement in there which is not a relocated IP notice. Are those OK, or not? (@Leo, help!) Not including something in the NOTICE that must

Re: [VOTE] Release of Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3

2011-11-23 Thread sebb
On 23 November 2011 05:17, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.com wrote: All, I'm happy to announce that Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3 is available and ready for your testing and voting. Release candidate artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4-incubating-RC3/

Re: [VOTE] Release of Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3

2011-11-23 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-11-23, sebb wrote: On 23 November 2011 05:17, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.com wrote: I'm happy to announce that Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3 is available and ready for your testing and voting. Release candidate artifacts:

[VOTE] Release of Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3

2011-11-22 Thread Prescott Nasser
All, I'm happy to announce that Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3 is available and ready for your testing and voting. Release candidate artifacts: http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4-incubating-RC3/ SVN tag revision:

Re: [VOTE] Release of Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3

2011-11-22 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2011-11-23, Prescott Nasser wrote: I'm happy to announce that Lucene.Net 2.9.4-incubating-RC3 is available and ready for your testing and voting. This release has one IPMC +1 so far (mine) and needs at least two more. Stefan