El día 19 de agosto de 2012 18:22, José Ramírez
ramirezjos...@yahoo.com escribió:
Hola, estoy interesado en usar el :
Project Management Template with Gantt Schedule creation
http://templates.services.openoffice.org/en/node/5927
traducido al ESPAÑOL, me gustaría saber como puedo
Hi Henri,
thanks for taking care of this.
IANAL but technically yes I think that the OAuth 2.0 part of Amber can be
considered as a fork.
Before to perform the first release we followed what has been suggested in
LEGAL-134.
Did we miss something? Should we do something more or we can assume
Antonio Sanso created PODLINGNAMESEARCH-12:
--
Summary: Establish whether Apache Amber is a suitable name
Key: PODLINGNAMESEARCH-12
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-12
Hi Folks!
The deltaspike-0.3-incubating vote has internally passed with lots of +1.
We have 2 IPMC +1 so far and like to ask for a tough review from fellow IPMCs.
[+1] all fine, ship it
[+0] I don't care but smells fine
[-1] stop it, this stuff contains a blocker ${insertreason}
The VOTE
This is the second call for vote to graduate Oozie podling from Apache
Incubator, comments and suggestions received during the first call have
been addressed.
Oozie entered the Incubator in July of 2011. Since then it has added
two new committers and made two significant releases following the
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com wrote:
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating)
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
-1
I object to the claim that the AOO binaries are officially part of this
[resending, starting as a new email to force a new thread]
This is the second call for vote to graduate Oozie podling from Apache
Incubator, comments and suggestions received during the first call have
been addressed.
Oozie entered the Incubator in July of 2011. Since then it has added
two new
+1
Thanks,
Mayank
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur t...@cloudera.comwrote:
This is the second call for vote to graduate Oozie podling from Apache
Incubator, comments and suggestions received during the first call have
been addressed.
Oozie entered the Incubator in July
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Per the IPMC's Guide to Successful Graduation [1] this is the
optional, but recommended, community vote for us to express our
willingness/readiness to govern ourselves. If this vote passes then
we continue by drafting a
+1. Signatures and checksums look good. LICENSE, NOTICE, and DISCLAIMER file
look good.
Alan.
On Aug 17, 2012, at 2:29 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
This is the fourth release for Apache Bigtop (incubating), version 0.4.0.
This has been voted through on the bigtop-dev@incubator.a.o
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Per the IPMC's Guide to Successful Graduation [1] this is the
optional, but recommended, community vote for us to express our
willingness/readiness
On Aug 20, 2012, at 12:45 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com wrote:
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating)
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
-1
I object to the
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Andre Fischer awf@gmail.com wrote:
[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating)
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Do not release this package
On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 13:32 -0700, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Per the IPMC's Guide to Successful Graduation [1] this is the
optional, but recommended, community vote for us to express our
willingness/readiness to govern
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Per the IPMC's Guide to Successful Graduation [1] this is the
optional, but
+1 from me (binding).
Good luck guys!
Cheers,
Chris
On Aug 20, 2012, at 11:25 AM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
This is the second call for vote to graduate Oozie podling from Apache
Incubator, comments and suggestions received during the first call have
been addressed.
Oozie entered the
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:03 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
Well, for myself, I don't have a problem with the AOO project not having
official binary releases - in such a circumstance I would strongly
prefer no binary release at all.
I wonder who might step into the breach to provide
+1.
Alan.
On Aug 20, 2012, at 1:04 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur wrote:
[resending, starting as a new email to force a new thread]
This is the second call for vote to graduate Oozie podling from Apache
Incubator, comments and suggestions received during the first call have
been addressed.
Just because some other podlings have released binary artifacts does
not mean AOO can base their entire release strategy on binaries.
As Marvin has said: source releases are the primary release mechanism.
Binaries are and should be a distant second.
I would also state that continuing to argue
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:03 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
Well, for myself, I don't have a problem with the AOO project not having
official binary releases - in such a circumstance I would strongly
prefer no
Top-Post - you question is answered below.
In my mind as an IPMC member and Apache Member, this is a source release VOTE
with convenience binary artifacts.
Edge case and RAT check discussion at the bottom, if that balances your vote in
either direction.
Please advise about whether you think
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
Just because some other podlings have released binary artifacts does
not mean AOO can base their entire release strategy on binaries.
True, But we have not based our entire release strategy on binaries.
If you recall we spent
On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 17:01 -0700, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:03 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
Well, for myself, I don't have a problem with the AOO project not having
official binary releases - in such a circumstance I would strongly
prefer no binary release at
I do not dispute the existence of other reliable creators of binary
distributions. The *nix packagings and installation in consumer desktops are
notable for the value that they provide.
I think that experience teaches us that there absolutely needs to be a way to
obtain and install
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:59 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 17:01 -0700, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:03 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
Well, for myself, I don't have a problem with the AOO project not having
official binary releases - in
On Aug 20, 2012 8:33 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I would also state that continuing to argue is symptomatic of a
failure to understand and integrate with the Foundation's thoughts on
the matter. Or to at
I'm sorry, I'm playing catch-up and I'm a bit unclear on the argument - Marvin
said: If the podling believes that ASF-endorsed binaries are a hard
requirement,
then it seems to me that the ASF is not yet ready for AOO and will not be
until suitable infrastructure and legal institutions to
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 20, 2012 8:33 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I would also state that continuing to argue is symptomatic of a
failure to understand and
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.com wrote:
I'm sorry, I'm playing catch-up and I'm a bit unclear on the argument -
Marvin said: If the podling believes that ASF-endorsed binaries are a hard
requirement,
then it seems to me that the ASF is not yet ready
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 20, 2012 8:33 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I would also state
Simple enough - thanks.
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 23:05:00 -0400
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache OpenOffice Community Graduation Vote
From: gst...@gmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.com
wrote:
I'm sorry, I'm playing
Actually one more question - so we can release binaries, but we can't call them
official? Do we have wording for this? Official source code release with
accompanying binaries for convenience or some such?
From: geobmx...@hotmail.com
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: [VOTE]
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Prescott Nasser geobmx...@hotmail.com
wrote:
I'm sorry, I'm playing catch-up and I'm a bit unclear on the argument -
Marvin said: If the podling believes that ASF-endorsed binaries are a
Officially, no Apache project has ever, ever, released a binary.
Apache projects have published convenience binaries to accompany their
releases, which have been, by definition, source.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Benson Margulies
bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
Officially, no Apache project has ever, ever, released a binary.
Apache projects have published convenience binaries to accompany their
releases, which have been, by definition, source.
Maybe you can help clarify
+1
Thanks,
Mayank
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur t...@cloudera.comwrote:
[resending, starting as a new email to force a new thread]
This is the second call for vote to graduate Oozie podling from Apache
Incubator, comments and suggestions received during the first call
On Mon, 2012-08-20 at 17:01 -0700, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:03 PM, drew d...@baseanswers.com wrote:
Well, for myself, I don't have a problem with the AOO project not having
official binary releases - in such a circumstance I would strongly
prefer no binary release at
37 matches
Mail list logo
