Re: key signing

On 11 October 2012 02:39, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Greg Stein wrote on Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 21:31:30 -0400: >> Not too much. We still instruct users "take the signatures and verify >> them against blah.apache.org/KEYS". John Blackhat could replace the >> signatures and install his entry into KEYS. >

Re: Preparing for the October reports

On 11 October 2012 22:30, David Crossley wrote: > Rob Weir wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Benson Margulies >> wrote: >> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Rob Weir wrote: >> >> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Jukka Zitting >> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >> >>> >> >>> Thanks for the revi

Re: Preparing for the October reports

On 12 October 2012 08:16, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > sebb wrote on Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 04:08:53 +0100: >> On 11 October 2012 22:30, David Crossley wrote: >> > Rob Weir wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Benson Margulies >> >> wrote: >>

Re: ${podling}.incubator.apache.org

On 12 October 2012 08:31, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Do people mind if web sites (and maybe mailing lists) of new podlings > live at domains of the form "${podling}.incubator.apache.org"? > > This is in relation to infra work on streamlining TLP migrations. (Case > in point: CMS TLP migrations.) Thi

Re: ${podling}.incubator.apache.org

On 12 October 2012 12:58, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Jukka Zitting > wrote: >> ...I'd even be fine with ${podling}.apache.org especially if >> they've already completed the PODLINGNAMESEARCH process > > Agreed - we could just require a visible standard "in

Re: local build of incubator site incorrectly reports success

On 17 October 2012 09:47, Ross Gardler wrote: > I just created the Ripple podling site and in so doing I mistakenly > left in some broken xml in ripple.xml > > Running the sanity build locally reported success. So I published the > live site which was missing (as you would expect) ripple.html > >

Re: [VOTE] Release celix-0.0.1-incubating

On 23 October 2012 13:57, Alexander Broekhuis wrote: > Hi incubator people, > > I would like to start the vote for the first release of Celix! > The last few months we have been working on this release. > Most of the time went into cleaning up sources, getting the required > files into the correct

Re: [VOTE] Release celix-0.0.1-incubating

On 23 October 2012 16:43, sebb wrote: > On 23 October 2012 13:57, Alexander Broekhuis wrote: >> Hi incubator people, >> >> I would like to start the vote for the first release of Celix! >> The last few months we have been working on this release. >> Most of the t

Re: [VOTE] Release celix-0.0.1-incubating

On 23 October 2012 18:57, Matthias Friedrich wrote: > On Tuesday, 2012-10-23, sebb wrote: > [...] >> There is something wrong when downloading using a browser. >> I tried both Firefox and Chrome; they both result in the same >> (corrupted) file. However Opera is OK. >

Re: [VOTE] Release celix-0.0.1-incubating

other look at this? > > That would be nice, as people know, Celix only has two mentors at the moment > (Karl and me) so we really need somebody else to review this release and/or > sign up as an extra mentor. > >> Sebb: Can you please check it out again and if all looks go

Re: Content-Encoding, License for .graffle file, Was: Fwd: [VOTE] Release celix-0.0.1-incubating

On 30 October 2012 20:18, Florian Holeczek wrote: > Hi all, > > taking this out of the Celix vote thread in order to keep it tidy. > > Sebb wrote: >> The file documents/Celix.graffle does not have a license. > > In JSPWiki, we have a .graffle file, too. Although this i

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

On 30 October 2012 20:16, Om wrote: > Hi all, > > After our first release as Apache Flex, we are following it up with the Apache > Flex SDK Installer (Incubating) AIR application. > > The Apache Flex SDK Installer AIR application provides an easy, > single-click installation of the Apache Flex SDK

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

On 1 November 2012 20:03, Carol Frampton wrote: > > > On 11/1/12 7 :16AM, "sebb" wrote: > >>On 30 October 2012 20:16, Om wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> After our first release as Apache Flex, we are following it up with the >>>Apache

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

On 1 November 2012 21:05, Alex Harui wrote: > > > > On 11/1/12 1:16 PM, "sebb" wrote: > >>>> The key C1708693 does not appear to be available from the normal >>>> public PGP key servers. >>> >>> I presume you would like Om to pub

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Flex SDK Installer 1.0.8-incubating

On 1 November 2012 18:15, Om wrote: > Thanks for taking a look :-) Responses inline: > > > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 4:16 AM, sebb wrote: > >> On 30 October 2012 20:16, Om wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > After our first release as Apache Flex, we are

Re: Formats of SHA/MD5 checksums

On 20 November 2012 21:20, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> Hi! >> >> while reviewing Celix RC I came across a peculiar format >> for the SHA/MD5 checksums which I've never seen before: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubato

Re: Formats of SHA/MD5 checksums

On 20 November 2012 23:22, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:51 PM, sebb wrote: >> (Though installing it just for hash creation may be overkill). >> >> Maven generates hashes which are easy to check. >> It's easy to use Ant to generate hashes in

Re: Committership of a podling

On 22 November 2012 10:42, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > When a podling graduates, their unix group needs to created and > initialised with the committers of that podling. Is it possible to get > that set of availid's programmatically? > > Basically, do I have options other than "use the authz file grou

Re: Committership of a podling

On 22 November 2012 12:15, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > sebb wrote on Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 11:25:48 +: >> On 22 November 2012 10:42, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> > When a podling graduates, their unix group needs to created and >> > initialised with the committers of that

Re: Committership of a podling

On 22 November 2012 22:16, Craig L Russell wrote: ... > If someone wants to scrape a file, I'd suggest adding a script to > foundation/board/scripts which would take the date as a parameter and then > scrape ../board_minutes_date to find the new projects. > > The result of scraping the file can

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kalumet 0.6-incubating release

On 9 December 2012 07:17, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache > Kalumet 0.6-incubating. This will be our first release. A vote was held > on the developer mailing list and passed with 7 +1s: > > http://mail-archives.apa

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kalumet 0.6-incubating release

hat archive. The LICENSE file must contain the licenses for all software included with the archives, starting with the AL. > Not sure to understand you remarks. > > Regards > JB > > > On 12/11/2012 10:11 PM, sebb wrote: >> >> On 9 December 2012 07:17, Jean-Baptiste Ono

Re: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/website.html is out of date?

On 12 December 2012 07:03, David Crossley wrote: > Benson Margulies wrote: >> The doc for updating the Incubator web site seems to be inconsistent >> with the situation at hand. > > Yeah, a few of us have added bits and pieces to try to keep up, > but yes it needs improvement. A lot of the informa

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kalumet 0.6-incubating release

associated NOTICE file. > Regards > JB > > > On 12/12/2012 10:53 AM, sebb wrote: >> >> On 12 December 2012 06:21, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I don't get you for the NOTICE: >>> 1/ the date is the

Re: DOAP

On 2 January 2013 10:08, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Hi, > > Onami is not listed below, but we have a Doap file (which needs some > maintenance :-) > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/onami/committers/doap_Onami.rdf > > Three questions, because I am not so familiar with Doap files. > > 1)

Re: First attempt at January2013 report template

On 29 December 2012 23:42, Benson Margulies wrote: > On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 5:50 PM, Christian Grobmeier > wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Benson Margulies >> wrote: >>> On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Christian Grobmeier >>> wrote: I like these templates. Not sure if it

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Apache Oltu (formerly Apache Amber) graduation resolution

On 29 December 2012 12:28, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all, > more than 72h have passed and the current [VOTE] can be considered > concluded and passes with the following resolution: > > five +1 votes from following IPMC: > > * Benson Margulies > * Alan Cabrera > * Olivier Lamy > * Christian Grobme

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kalumet 0.6-incubating release (2nd try)

On 20 December 2012 13:23, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > Hi all, > > This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache > Kalumet 0.6-incubating (2nd try). This will be our first release. A vote was > held on the developer mailing list and passed with 6 +1s: > > +1 (binding):

Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC4 release

On 8 January 2013 22:19, Chen, Pei wrote: > Hi, > > This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache > cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating. This will be our first release. > > A vote was held on the developer mailing list and passed with 5 +1s: > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_

Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC4 release

On 9 January 2013 01:38, Chen, Pei wrote: > > > Sent from my iPad > > On Jan 8, 2013, at 8:18 PM, "sebb" wrote: > >> On 8 January 2013 22:19, Chen, Pei wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> This is a call for a vote on releasing the following candi

Re: [VOTE] Apache cTAKES 3.0.0-incubating RC4 release

On 9 January 2013 13:13, Chen, Pei wrote: > Hi Sebb, >> In (almost) all other podlings it is at the top of the SVN tree. >> IMO it should be present alongside NOTICE and LICENSE so it is obvious to >> people browsing SVN. > Thanks for the input. I already made this chan

Re: [VOTE] Apache Kalumet 0.6-incubating release (2nd try)

e NOTICE file as blocker for this > first release ? I consider it a blocker. > Thanks ! > > Regards > JB > > > On 01/07/2013 10:13 PM, sebb wrote: >> >> On 20 December 2012 13:23, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >&

Re: [VOTE] release Apache Onami Parent 2-incubating

On 12 January 2013 17:31, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Hi all guys, > > The Apache Onami PPMC voted for Apache Onami Parent 2-incubating[1] > which already collected 2 IPMC binding votes: > > SVN source tag: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/onami/tags/org.apache.onami.parent-2-incubating/ N

Re: svn commit: r1432804 - /incubator/public/branches/license_howto/licensing_howto.mdtext

On 14 January 2013 05:00, wrote: > Author: marvin > Date: Mon Jan 14 05:00:28 2013 > New Revision: 1432804 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1432804&view=rev > Log: > INCUBATOR-125 Initial version of howto. > > Create a howto describing a formulaic approach to assembling the > LICENSE and

Re: svn commit: r1432804 - /incubator/public/branches/license_howto/licensing_howto.mdtext

On 14 January 2013 23:42, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 11:52 AM, sebb wrote: >>> +Bundling Permissively-Licensed Dependencies >>> +=== >>> + >>> +Bundling a dependency which is issued unde

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Bloodhound 0.4 (incubating)

On 17 January 2013 22:47, Ryan Ollos wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I would like to initiate the vote for releasing Apache Bloodhound 0.4 > (incubating) > in the incubator following the successful vote of the Bloodhound PPMC. > > The vote PPMC vote thread: > http://markmail.org/message/d2yvz2tx5pj5

Re: Incubator voting status page

On 29 January 2013 14:17, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 29.01.2013 09:53, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> David Crossley wrote on Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 16:12:34 +1100: >>> You are striking the same type of problems that Clutch has >>> needed to deal with over the years. In general, the state of >>> podling meta

Re: Incubator voting status page

On 31 January 2013 07:55, Branko Čibej wrote: > There is now an embedded version of the voting status page available for > preview at > > http://people.apache.org/~brane/fakeubator/votes.html > > By "embedded" I mean, integrated into (a copy of) the Incubator site. > The page is updated every

Re: svn commit: r1441429 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/bloodhound.xml

Please remember to publish the site after committing updates. On 1 February 2013 12:49, wrote: > Author: brane > Date: Fri Feb 1 12:49:29 2013 > New Revision: 1441429 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1441429&view=rev > Log: > Replace silly dots with   entities. > Add archive links to

Re: Incubator voting status page

On 1 February 2013 10:29, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 31.01.2013 17:18, Branko Čibej wrote: >> On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >>> Branko Čibej wrote on Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 16:40:14 +0100: I guess it's best if I ping infra and ask about getting this done (or probably file an INFR

Re: Incubator voting status page

On 1 February 2013 17:05, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > Branko Čibej wrote on Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 17:29:45 +0100: >> I think updating the httpd config is the more realistic option, since it >> doesn't presume a ssh tunnel between minotaur and the site server. > > The only supported way to get content to

Re: Incubator voting status page

On 1 February 2013 16:29, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 01.02.2013 17:01, sebb wrote: >> On 1 February 2013 10:29, Branko Čibej wrote: >>> On 31.01.2013 17:18, Branko Čibej wrote: >>>> On 31.01.2013 16:51, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >>>>> Branko Čibej wrote on

Re: Incubator voting status page

On 1 February 2013 19:48, sebb wrote: > On 1 February 2013 16:29, Branko Čibej wrote: >> On 01.02.2013 17:01, sebb wrote: >>> On 1 February 2013 10:29, Branko Čibej wrote: >>>> On 31.01.2013 17:18, Branko Čibej wrote: >>>>> On 31.01.2013 16:51, Dani

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache VXQuery Incubating 0.2 (RC1)

On 22 February 2013 06:56, Till Westmann wrote: > Please verify and vote on the first release candidate for our first release > apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-RC1. > Since this is our first release we would appreciate a thorough review. > > The tag to be voted on is > > https://svn.apache.org/repo

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.

On 11 March 2013 00:24, Mahadev Konar wrote: > Hi everyone, > > This is a call for a vote to release Apache Ambari 1.2.1 incubating. A vote > was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 6+1's with 5 of them > binding. > > mahadev (IPMC, PPMC) > ddas (IPMC, PPMC) > acmurthy (IPMC) >

Re: [VOTE] Apache Ambari (incubating) 1.2.1 Release Candidate RC0.

On 11 March 2013 20:17, Owen O'Malley wrote: > On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 8:13 PM, sebb wrote: > > The ambari-1.2.1-incubating.tar.gz.mds file is wrong; there should be >> separate files for each hash type. >> Normally only MD5 and SHA are provided. >> > >

Re: Creating announce@ lists by default

On 27 March 2013 16:48, Noah Slater wrote: > On 27 March 2013 16:28, Luciano Resende wrote: >> >> >> Do the general announce list lag behind because there are individual lists >> ? >> > > I see no reason why they would. Well, I found that sending a separate e-mail to announce@a.o was useful for

Re: Creating announce@ lists by default

On 27 March 2013 17:23, Luciano Resende wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Noah Slater wrote: >> So we just set out a policy for podlings to follow that says something >> like: if you use a project-specific announce@ list, anything you send to it >> must also be copied to annou...@apache.

Re: [VOTE] S4 0.6.0 Incubating Release Candidate 3

On 27 March 2013 19:07, Matthieu Morel wrote: > Hi everyone, > > > this is a call for a vote to release Apache S4 0.6.0 incubating. > > > A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed for RC3 with 6+1's > with 5 of them binding: > > +1 IPMC (phunt) > +1PPMC (mmorel, kishoreg, leoneu, fp

Re: [VOTE] S4 0.6.0 Incubating Release Candidate 3

On 27 March 2013 20:57, Matthieu Morel wrote: > Thanks for the feedback, > > I replied inline. > > On Mar 27, 2013, at 21:00 , sebb wrote: > >> On 27 March 2013 19:07, Matthieu Morel wrote: >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> >>> thi

Re: [VOTE] S4 0.6.0 Incubating Release Candidate 3

On 28 March 2013 07:40, Patrick Hunt wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 2:59 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 27 March 2013 20:57, Matthieu Morel wrote: >>> On Mar 27, 2013, at 21:00 , sebb wrote: >>>> On 27 March 2013 19:07, Matthieu Morel wrote: >>> gradle/gra

Re: committee-info.txt and the incubator PMC

On 3 April 2013 16:36, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > >> So how about having just historical info in the text file, and LDAP >> for current info? >> > > Isn't this the current rationale? I see the LDAP group answering the > question "Does the person A belong to group B now?

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)

On 5 April 2013 04:07, Mattmann, Chris A (398J) < chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > Dear Ben, > > -Original Message- > From: Benjamin Hindman > Reply-To: "mesos-...@incubator.apache.org" > > Date: Thursday, March 7, 2013 3:52 PM > To: "general@incubator.apache.org" > Cc: mesos >

Re: [VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.1-incubating

On 15 April 2013 22:56, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez < juanpablo.san...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > We've held a vote on jspwiki-dev to release 2.9.1-incubating [1]. > > The vote on release candidate has been open for more than 72 hours on the > developer mailing list. After the voting timefram

Re: [VOTE] Release JSPWiki version 2.9.1-incubating

On 16 April 2013 22:24, Juan Pablo Santos Rodríguez < juanpablo.san...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Sebb, > > first of all, thanks for your time reviewing the RC and your comments > > seems we'll have to cancel the vote. Hopefully, we'll have a new RC in a > fe

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Marmotta 3.0.0-incubating (RC8)

On 15 April 2013 14:40, Sebastian Schaffert wrote: > Dear all, > > Apache Marmotta is an implementation of the Linked Data Platform and > accompanying services. In the last months, we have migrated our old source > code to the Apache infrastructure and tried to adapt the Apache policies in > all

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Marmotta 3.0.0-incubating (RC8)

On 17 April 2013 17:35, Sebastian Schaffert wrote: > Hi sebb, > > there are different NOTICE files for the different distributions, because > the binary distributions are rather framework applications that bundle a > lot of third party libraries. > That's as it should be

Re: [VOTE] S4 0.6.0 Release Candidate 4

On 22 April 2013 11:50, Matthieu Morel wrote: > Hi everyone, > > this is a call for a vote to release Apache S4 0.6.0 incubating. Note that > we are missing 1 IPMC +1 vote. > > > A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed for RC4 with 7+1's > with > 6 of them binding: > > 2 IPMC : p

Re: [VOTE] S4 0.6.0 Release Candidate 4

On 22 April 2013 13:25, Matthieu Morel wrote: > > On Apr 22, 2013, at 13:14 , sebb wrote: > > > On 22 April 2013 11:50, Matthieu Morel wrote: > > > >> Hi everyone, > >> > >> this is a call for a vote to release Apache S4 0.6.0 incubating

Re: LICENSE/NOTICE revisited (was Release Apache Marmotta 3.0.0-incubating (RC8))

On 23 April 2013 08:31, Sergio Fernández < sergio.fernan...@salzburgresearch.at> wrote: > Hi Marvin, > > thanks for your time analysing our release. Please, find my reply inline. > > On 18/04/13 02:30, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Sebastian Schaffert wrote: >> >>

Re: LICENSE/NOTICE revisited (was Release Apache Marmotta 3.0.0-incubating (RC8))

On 23 April 2013 18:05, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton > wrote: > > Not so fast about dispensing with Category B requirements for pointers to > > source code. > > Thank you for the specific information about the MPL. What I said was > this: > >

Re: "You are not allowed to edit this page."

Please see: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/FrontPage -second sentence in the cell to the right of the Incubator image. On 24 April 2013 15:13, james pruett wrote: > I am suggesting a new project. > Step 1 said create an account which I did. > Step 2 said to create a homepage. > I tried that,

Re: [VOTE] S4 0.6.0 Release Candidate 4

On 25 April 2013 11:17, Matthieu Morel wrote: > Hi, > > we didn't get any extra vote, so the release is stalled. > > Sebb pointed out that the source release includes the javadoc. > The source archive is supposed to contain only files from the source code control system

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Curator 2.0.0-incubating

On 1 May 2013 06:03, Jordan Zimmerman wrote: > Hello, > > This is a vote to release Apache Curator 2.0.0-incubating > > Link to release notes: > * no release notes as this is the initial release * > > However, there is a CHANGES file which details lots of previous releases - what's that about? Sh

Re: [CANCEL] [VOTE] Release Apache Curator 2.0.0-incubating (updated)

Next time please provide a link to the tag in the source code control system. That's needed to trace provenance of the files in the source release. On 1 May 2013 19:02, Jordan Zimmerman wrote: > I've completely misunderstood this process and need to take this back to > curator-dev. > > FYI > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6-incubating(RC4)

On 2 May 2013 07:04, Florian Hopf wrote: > Hi all, > > The ODF Toolkit 0.6 is ready for release. > > We had a successful vote in the PPMC. The PPMC vote result is here: > http://markmail.org/message/**fqikz72pys4qr7pa > > We need three more IPMC votes

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODF Toolkit 0.6-incubating(RC4)

There is no DISCLAIMER that I could see in the SVN tag nor in the archive. This is required of all Incubator projects. Some files don't have AL headers, for example: validator/src/main/assembly/src.xml On 2 May 2013 12:55, Rob Weir wrote: > On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:41 AM, seb

Re: configuration of svn [Was: svn commit: r1477438 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/jclouds.xml]

A further wrinkle here is that SVN treats application/xml as binary. To be treated as text, an XML file needs to be text/xml or similar, see: http://subversion.apache.org/faq.html#binary-files On 6 May 2013 10:25, Greg Stein wrote: > After you add a file (and before commit), you can use

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Curator 2.0.0-incubating released

Congrats. However, what is Curator? The mail does not say anything about it. Please ensure that any announcement e-mails about Curator include a brief description of what it is. On 10 May 2013 17:47, Jordan Zimmerman wrote: > Hello, > > The Apache Curator team is pleased to announce the relea

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Curator 2.0.0-incubating released

and more reliable." > -Jordan > > On May 11, 2013, at 1:00 AM, sebb wrote: > > Congrats. > > However, what is Curator? > > The mail does not say anything about it. > > Please ensure tha

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Curator 2.0.0-incubating released

rator is the thing itself. Sorry, but that is not the case for trademarks. See for example: http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs.html#adjective > -JZ > > On May 12, 2013, at 5:13 AM, sebb wrote: > >> On 11 May 2013 20:20, Jordan Zimmerman wrote: >>> I&

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Curator 2.0.0-incubating released

propriate to link to the article and INTA] > > On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 3:14 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On 12 May 2013 20:59, Jordan Zimmerman wrote: >> > Respectfully I disagree :) "The Sony TV is black" is correct because the >> noun/object is "tv&quo

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache BeanShell in the Incubator

On 24 May 2013 08:23, Simone Tripodi wrote: > Dear ASF members, > > We would like to propose BeanShell for the incubator. > > The proposal draft is available at: > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeanShellProposal, > follows below the proposal > > Open is open for at least 72h and closes approxi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Mesos 0.11.0-incubating (RC1)

On 25 May 2013 20:01, Luciano Resende wrote: > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Vinod Kone wrote: >> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Mesos >> (incubating) >> version 0.11.0. This will be the third incubator release for Mesos in Apache >> . >> >> The candidate for Mesos

Re: What's the difference between dormant and retired?

On 30 May 2013 08:08, ant elder wrote: > Looking in poddling.xml there are 3 poddlings marked "dormant" and nearly > 30 marked "retired". The 3 dormant ones are from ages ago and looking back > in the archives its from when there wasn't a documented retirement process > and people didn't really kn

Podling not Poddling

I keep seeing the word Poddling being used in mail and now the Wiki [1]; however I thought the original and correct name was Podling? I think we should stick to Podling for all the documentation. Anyone mind if I rename the Wiki page? [1] https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OlderPoddlingsWithARelea

Re: svn commit: r1488735 - in /incubator/public/trunk/tools: NOTICE.txt requirements.txt setup.py src/asf/utils/ src/asf/utils/__init__.py src/asf/utils/config.py src/asf/utils/file.py tests/test_conf

On 2 June 2013 17:21, wrote: > Author: adc > Date: Sun Jun 2 16:21:24 2013 > New Revision: 1488735 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1488735 > Log: > First few utility functions/classes > > Also include LinkedIn notice > > Added: > incubator/public/trunk/tools/src/asf/utils/ > incubator/pu

Re: svn commit: r1488735 - in /incubator/public/trunk/tools: NOTICE.txt requirements.txt setup.py src/asf/utils/ src/asf/utils/__init__.py src/asf/utils/config.py src/asf/utils/file.py tests/test_conf

On 3 June 2013 00:37, Alan Cabrera wrote: > > On Jun 2, 2013, at 4:01 PM, sebb wrote: > >>> Modified: incubator/public/trunk/tools/NOTICE.txt >>> URL: >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/public/trunk/tools/NOTICE.txt?rev=148

Re: svn commit: r1488735 - in /incubator/public/trunk/tools: NOTICE.txt requirements.txt setup.py src/asf/utils/ src/asf/utils/__init__.py src/asf/utils/config.py src/asf/utils/file.py tests/test_conf

On 3 June 2013 05:10, Greg Stein wrote: > On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote: >>... >> >> Apache Incubator tools >> Copyright 2013 The Apache Software Foundation >> >> This product includes software developed at >> The Apache Software Foundation (http://www.apache.org/). >> >> Th

Re: svn commit: r1488735 - in /incubator/public/trunk/tools: NOTICE.txt requirements.txt setup.py src/asf/utils/ src/asf/utils/__init__.py src/asf/utils/config.py src/asf/utils/file.py tests/test_conf

On 3 June 2013 22:40, Greg Stein wrote: > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:23 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 3 June 2013 05:10, Greg Stein wrote: >>> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Alan Cabrera wrote: >>>>... >>>> >>>> Apache Incubator tools >>>

Re: svn commit: r1489076 - in /incubator/public/trunk/tools: src/asf/incubator/podlings.py tests/test_podlings.py

On 3 June 2013 18:43, wrote: > Author: adc > Date: Mon Jun 3 17:43:51 2013 > New Revision: 1489076 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1489076 > Log: > Minor sketch of some podling code before I forget to check it in. And perhaps add some comments explaining what the purpose is? --

Re: svn commit: r1488735 - in /incubator/public/trunk/tools: NOTICE.txt requirements.txt setup.py src/asf/utils/ src/asf/utils/__init__.py src/asf/utils/config.py src/asf/utils/file.py tests/test_conf

On 4 June 2013 01:04, Greg Stein wrote: > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:45 PM, sebb wrote: >>... >> I think that conflicts with the advice here: >> >> http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#mod-notice >> >> The last sentence says: "Do not ad

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Wave 0.4 based on RC3

On 21 June 2013 00:59, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > Hi Ali, > > Comments inline. > > On Sat, Jun 15, 2013, at 05:24 PM, Ali Lown wrote: > >> The result from the wave-dev vote can be found at: >> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201306.mbox/%3CCABRGrVfPOwN3E8N-uScruYbxdezpfZz

Re: Moderation of report reminders

On 13 July 2013 18:57, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greets, > > This report cycle, I audited the report reminders sent out by "Marvin"[1]. > After waiting a couple of days for moderation to clear, I used a web browser > to check the dev list archives for each podling in the report cycle to see > wheth

Re: Moderation of report reminders

On 13 July 2013 19:28, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 10:57:33AM -0700, Marvin Humphrey wrote: >> A second possibility might be to consolidate `-allow` lists. (I'm not sure >> whether this is technically feasible -- it came up yesterday on the infra >> list, but the discussion was

Re: svn commit: r1504150 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/metamodel.xml

On 17 July 2013 15:26, wrote: > Author: kaspersor > Date: Wed Jul 17 14:26:41 2013 > New Revision: 1504150 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1504150 > Log: > Added wiki page > > Modified: > incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/metamodel.xml (contents, props > changed) > > Modified: incuba

Re: svn commit: r1504284 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/metamodel.xml

On 17 July 2013 22:27, wrote: > Author: kaspersor > Date: Wed Jul 17 21:27:38 2013 > New Revision: 1504284 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1504284 > Log: > Updated source code link > > Modified: > incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/metamodel.xml > > Modified: incubator/public/trunk/conte

Re: Uploading a new recipe to Chef?

On 22 July 2013 19:34, Alex Tang <2degh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ignasi, > > Very much appreciate all the information you provided. I created > myrecipe.rb and tried upload it and received this error when it reached This is not relevant to the general Incubator list. Please drop the list in any fur

Re: Edit rights for Incubator Wiki

Done On 5 August 2013 13:57, Huesken, Jens wrote: > Hi, > my user name is JensHuesken and I need rights for editing and adding pages at > the Apache Incubator Wiki. > Thanks and best regards, > Jens. > > - To unsubscribe, e-mai

Re: Permissions to edit Incubator wiki

Done On 5 August 2013 19:46, Hitesh Shah wrote: > Hi > > Could someone grant me permissions to edit the incubator wiki? Username is > HiteshShah. > > thanks > -- Hitesh > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator

Re: svn commit: r1515136 - in /incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance: index.xml wicket-andrea-del-bene-wicket-guide.xml

On 18 August 2013 16:27, wrote: > Author: dashorst > Date: Sun Aug 18 15:27:12 2013 > New Revision: 1515136 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1515136 > Log: > Added IP clearance for Wicket Guide > > Added: > incubator/public/trunk/content/ip-clearance/wicket-andrea-del-bene-wicket-guide.xml > U

Re: Review of binary tar ball for Apache Falcon (incubating) 0.3 RC4

On 20 August 2013 06:19, Srikanth Sundarrajan wrote: > Hello, > We had recently called for a vote on Apache Falcon 0.3 RC4 (source tar ball) > and the result has been announced (http://s.apache.org/wLO). We intend to > also make a binary tar ball available for user convenience. We would really

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1

On 6 January 2011 16:10, Karl Wright wrote: > I am happy to provide clear-text versions of KEYS and CHANGES.txt if > that is what you require.  I've just never seen any other Apache > project that did that. All Apache releases require pgp signatures, and the KEYS file must contain the key necessa

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1

On 6 January 2011 13:12, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > Hi, > > The Apache ManifoldCF community has voted to release our first set of > artifacts and now would like an Incubator vote.  Since this is our first > release, extra attention to detail is appreciated. > > You can find the artifacts at http:/

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1

On 6 January 2011 17:34, Karl Wright wrote: >> The key should also be added to a pgp key server. >> > > The key has already been added to the MIT web of trust - I presume > that is what you meant? Yes, I meant that the key should be retrievable from a pgp key server - which it is (just checked).

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1

On 6 January 2011 18:03, sebb wrote: > On 6 January 2011 13:12, Grant Ingersoll wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The Apache ManifoldCF community has voted to release our first set of >> artifacts and now would like an Incubator vote.  Since this is our first >> rele

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1

On 6 January 2011 18:23, Karl Wright wrote: >>> Very well; we will discontinue all binary distributions. >> >> That's not what I said. >> >> You can have a binary distribution if you wish, but there must be a >> source distribution. >> > > As I said before, it makes no sense to distribute Manifold

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1

Where is the SVN tag for the release? On 6 January 2011 13:12, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > Hi, > > The Apache ManifoldCF community has voted to release our first set of > artifacts and now would like an Incubator vote.  Since this is our first > release, extra attention to detail is appreciated. >

Confusing naming of Manifold Connector Framework resources

It's quite difficult finding the resources for the Manifold Connector Framework. The Incubator web-site is at: http://incubator.apache.org/connectors/ SVN appears to be at: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lcf/ The Java package is org.apache.manifoldcf So the project currently uses

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.1

heck exactly what has changed between RCs. > Karl > > > On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 3:03 PM, sebb wrote: >> Where is the SVN tag for the release? >> >> On 6 January 2011 13:12, Grant Ingersoll wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> The Apache ManifoldCF communi

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >