+1
Carl.
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Tom White tomwh...@apache.org wrote:
We've added three mentors since starting the proposal thread, so I
would like to start the vote to accept Whirr into the Apache
Incubator.
The proposal is included below and is also at:
On 05/07/2010 02:33 AM, Gurkan Erdogdu wrote:
Hi;
+1;
I am happy to help during incubation process;
Thanks;
--Gurkan
Gurkan,
Is this an offer to help mentor the project, or just help out as needed.
Reason
for asking is if you would like to be represented onto the proposal or
just
On 05/07/2010 10:21 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Carl,
if you need additional mentors, count me in.
thanks,
dims
Dims,
That would be great.
Carl.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
On 05/12/2010 08:45 PM, David Lutterkort wrote:
Hi all,
after the discussion so far [1], I'd like to put Detlacloud for a vote
for acceptance into the Apache Incubator according to the proposal[2]
I _think_ I've added everybody who expressed interest in being a mentor
or initial committer to
On 05/17/2010 01:09 PM, David Lutterkort wrote:
Hi all,
by my count, the vote for Deltacloud yielded 13 +1 votes and no 0 or -1
votes.
I will work with Carl to get Deltacloud set up in the incubator.
thanks to everybody for the very positive reception,
David
Thanks, I start the process
David is currently on vacation, so I'll post a brief report for him:
Deltacloud.
Deltacloud is still in project setup. The main delay has been
working the process of ICLA recording and account setup. Once
the account requests have been processed, I expect I will be able
to complete the project
On 06/14/2010 01:14 PM, Luciano Resende wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 9:13 AM, Noel J. Bergmann...@devtech.com wrote:
There are several missing reports. Bluesky, Deltacloud, Lucene Connector
Framework, and River.
POST THEM IMMEDIATELY!
Here is the one for DeltaCloud (which I just
- Project basically setup (info for 3 people still being worked to get
ICLA correctly listed)
- Code has been imported.
- Working to get Code Grant on file
- Project active, commits and mail list discussions have started.
- The website has not been setup yet.
Project is up, running and
On 08/17/2010 11:39 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
- Original Message
From: Ross Gardlerrgard...@apache.org
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Tue, August 17, 2010 8:45:01 AM
Subject: Re: Radical revamp
On 17/08/2010 13:21, Joe Schaefer wrote:
[...]
Isn't that why we
On 08/17/2010 07:48 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 17/08/2010 17:35, Carl Trieloff wrote:
To this question, (what will make this model succeed or fail) I find
myself not coming
to defensible answers... I would love to see thoughts of others on this
question.
The thread implies it comes down
+1
Carl.
On 08/18/2010 07:31 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
+1
-- dims
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 18, 2010, at 7:11 PM, Joe Schaeferjoe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Now that the board has declared there are no legal
obstacles to what I have proposed, I'd like to
restart the vote.
Thanks
What is the view of having a project in Apache that pulls substantial
components
that are licensed under ASL as dependencies into the code base. I.e. not
coping the
code, but using components that have been built and maintained elsewhere
under ASL
but used as dependencies for running.
I
On 09/08/2010 10:29 AM, Scott Wilson wrote:
On 8 Sep 2010, at 15:13, Carl Trieloff wrote:
What is the view of having a project in Apache that pulls substantial components
that are licensed under ASL as dependencies into the code base. I.e. not coping
the
code, but using components
On 09/08/2010 11:06 AM, Scott Wilson wrote:
On 8 Sep 2010, at 15:40, Carl Trieloff wrote:
On 09/08/2010 10:29 AM, Scott Wilson wrote:
On 8 Sep 2010, at 15:13, Carl Trieloff wrote:
What is the view of having a project in Apache that pulls substantial
components
On 09/10/2010 05:31 AM, Gav... wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2867
Thanks :-)
Gav...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
I'll chase up Deltacloud to make sure it is in by tomorrow AM.
Carl.
On 11/15/2010 04:08 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hey Noel,
It's my understanding that Lucy isn't on this reporting cycle and was included
on the wiki by mistake.
Cheers,
Chris
On 11/15/10 12:03 PM, Noel J.
It is on the wiki. DeltaCloud
Deltacloud
Deltacloud defines a web service API for interacting with cloud service
providers and resources in those clouds in a unified manner. In
addition, it consists of a number of implementations of this API for the
most popular clouds.
I voted on the project vote with +1. I believe the release vote requires
another
IPMC / member vote.
Carl.
On 02/14/2011 01:20 PM, David Lutterkort wrote:
Hi all,
I just uploaded a release candidate for Deltacloud 0.2.0. The rc is
available from
On 02/21/2011 01:02 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Feb 21, 2011, at 11:34 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:23 AM, Mark Strubergstrub...@yahoo.de wrote:
I'm not really fit with ruby projects, but there are quite a few sources with
LGPL license headers. e.g.
+1
On 10/11/2011 08:40 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
+1
On Oct 4, 2011, at 1:00 PM, David Lutterkort wrote:
Hi all,
I just uploaded the first release candidate for Deltacloud 0.4.1. The rc is
available from http://people.apache.org/~lutter/deltacloud/0.4.1/rc1/
Please vote on the release
...@apache.org)
* Carl Trieloff (cctriel...@apache.org)
* Eric Woods (wood...@apache.org)
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that David Lutterkort be
appointed to the office of Vice President, Deltacloud, to serve in
accordance with and subject to the direction of the Board
You can add me as a mentor to the project.
Carl.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On 04/09/2012 09:32 PM, Kevin Kluge wrote:
Hi All. I'd like to call for a VOTE for CloudStack to enter the Incubator.
The proposal is available at [1] and I have also included it below. Please
vote with:
+1: accept CloudStack into Incubator
+0: don't care
-1: do not accept CloudStack
From below: For example, it's become standard that people use a
certain general model or template to submit their
proposals. (We are now trying to create an official template, but the
last X submissions have largely followed the same unofficial pattern).
I don't think it's unreasonable that
I am spending many hours working through Apache processes so do you mind
if I ask a few questions:
For the graduation,
a.) what are the demographics of the commiters added to the project
in the community building and how/is this considered in graduation?
b.) if there are committers on the
Garrett,
This is great to hear, one of the mails in the thread was getting me
concerned.
Thanks for the reply.
Carl.
Garrett Rooney wrote:
On 7/6/06, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am spending many hours working through Apache processes so do you mind
if I ask a few questions
)
* Rafael Schloming (Red Hat)
* Archit Shah (Red Hat)
* Stephen Shaw (JPMC)
* Gordon Sim (Red Hat)
* James Strachan (LogicBlaze)
* Manik Surtani (Red Hat)
* Carl Trieloff (Red Hat)
* Kim van der Riet (Red Hat)
* Sergey Yedrikov (IONA)
=== APACHE SPONSOR ===
The Blaze team will make the submission
Thanks for the comments - I will be brief and then we can have follow up
exchange as required. comments in-line.
Brian McCallister wrote:
Comments in line:
On Jul 17, 2006, at 12:10 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
== Interactions with the specifications ==
The specification is being developed
freely - without strings.
On the topic of - at which standards body it will land at, why is that
a concern, as the license of
the specification is well defined no matter where it goes
Regards
Carl.
Henri Yandell wrote:
On 7/18/06, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the comments
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 19 July 2006 03:07, Carl Trieloff wrote:
I have provided a direct link to one of the docs on our site
http://www.redhat.com/f/pdf/amqp/amqp_0-8_specification.pdf
The license is for the specification, which is far from an obvious one, so I
would
contracts address this
issue - state how the spec will be licensed. Under OASIS, AMQP license
should map to RF on Limited Terms.
thanks,
dims
On 7/19/06, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This worries me - accepting an implementation whose specification does
not yet have a defined license
legal.
Good questions, thanks
Carl.
Paul
On 7/19/06, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Wednesday 19 July 2006 03:07, Carl Trieloff wrote:
I have provided a direct link to one of the docs on our site
http://www.redhat.com/f/pdf/amqp/amqp_0
the community.
If you guys think that I am worh enough to be an initial committer for
this, please add me to the initial committer list.
- sahan
On 7/20/06, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/19/06, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henri said:
This worries me - accepting an implementation
nothing
personal here,
just waning to do what is best for the project Apache process.
Regards
Carl.
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 22:33 -0400, Carl Trieloff wrote:
Carl Trieloff wrote:
Sahan,
Thank you for your interest, do you mind if we do a brief call
-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200607.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please could someone provide input.
Regards
Carl.
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 22:33 -0400, Carl Trieloff wrote:
Carl Trieloff wrote:
Sahan,
Thank you for your interest, do you mind if we do
Quick question on trademarks.
If you search many of the Apache project names, they are trademarked to
gezoo, however
if you search Apache XXX it cleans up. Once/one day when the project
graduates from
Incubator it will also be Apache XXX which is unique.
How is this different from any of
Roy,
This would be consistent at least not within the software category
with the proposed name also, so
what I am pointing out is just that we are consistent with the
status-quo in Apache.
Regards
Carl.
Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Jul 21, 2006, at 6:39 AM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
If you
/homepage/*trademarks*.shtml
My understanding is the uniqueness of the full name and the lack of use
of the name in the same domain are the key. If needed I can take this
thread to Apache legal for comment.
Any help is appreciated, regards
Carl
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 7/24/06, Carl Trieloff
Thanks, see the other mail I just posted.
Carl.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Carl Trieloff wrote:
Roy,
This would be consistent at least not within the software category
with the proposed name also, so
what I am pointing out is just that we are consistent with the
status-quo in Apache
://www.synapse.co.in/homepage/trademarks.shtml.
How was the decision made around Synapse?
Carl.
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Carl Trieloff wrote:
...
Here are some examples for Derby.
Derby is a relational database implemented entirely in java, which
entered the Apache Incubator in August 2004
Thank you for all the feedback, would it be possible to post a link to this
at least one registered for web software as mentioned by someone in the
thread. This would be helpful to me.
Kind regards,
Carl.
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 7/24/06, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had
for a
name
that does not have a trademark in the software space.
Suggestions welcome, please mail those to me - we will hopefully provide a
new name for try out by COB tomorrow.
Kind regards
Carl.
Carl Trieloff wrote:
Thank you for all the feedback, would it be possible to post a link
After debate, and many trademark searches we have selected new name
that is free of any trademarks in the software space. ( not that easy)
The new name for Blaze is Glasgow.
I will update the wiki.
Regards
Carl.
Carl Trieloff wrote:
Naming of Blaze,
Based on all the feedback provided
.
Garrett Rooney wrote:
On 7/27/06, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After debate, and many trademark searches we have selected new name
that is free of any trademarks in the software space. ( not that easy)
The new name for Blaze is Glasgow.
I will update the wiki.
How about
James,
Anything that the Working group publishes / works on will be under the
license already
disclosed. As to TCK, there is a little bit of work in this area in the
spec but it does not meet a
definition of a TCK. The discussion is still ongoing as to what should
the TCK
look like. Many of
Brian,
Just as in JCP, OASIS or W3C the real work happens on private channels,
that said we are in
the process of creating public pages, from which to link user and
feedback lists for anyone to
read, access and interact with the working group.
Thanks for the feedback
Carl.
Brian
Brian McCallister wrote:
On Aug 1, 2006, at 10:44 AM, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
Could you clarify whether you are asking if the Glasgow project could
continue in a different direction from the spec, or whether the spec,
itself, could be changed/forked and distributed by the ASF?
If something
Thanks,
Noted, I have been involved more with OASIS in recent years.
Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 12:36 -0400, Carl Trieloff wrote:
Brian,
Just as in JCP, OASIS or W3C the real work happens on private channels,
that said we are in
the process of creating public pages
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Garrett Rooney wrote:
AMQP seems to be moving in this
direction, they've got some sort of agreement you can sign in order to
provide them feedback
I have a question, can anyone summarize how contributions under the ASL
would be weaker or stronger than
The ASF does not recognize corporate members;
Incorrect - Apace has a CCLA, and requires your employer to sign it
From icla
For the purposes of this definition,
control means (i) the power, direct or indirect, to cause the
direction or management of such entity, whether by contract or
either lead the ASF's direct
involvement
as the ASF spec liason (much as we've done within the JCP) or as an
individual
contributor.
I would love this.
Regards
Carl.
Carl Trieloff wrote:
The ASF does not recognize corporate members;
Incorrect - Apace has a CCLA, and requires your employer
this with
Cliff and see what we can come up during incubator
Carl
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Carl Trieloff wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
I have a question, can anyone summarize how contributions under the ASL
would be weaker or stronger than contributions under this RLA
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Carl Trieloff wrote:
I think this is one of the options we can look at to have any member of
the project provide feedback to the spec working group - however it seems
presumptuous to use the ASL or work out details like
I placed company names after names, as the last proposal to get voted on
did not
have company names on it and was requested to add company names. Nothing
more than that.
Carl.
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On 8/7/06, William A. Rowe, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not complicated, folks.
. wrote:
Carl Trieloff wrote:
But to the extent that ASF contributors offer productive growth and
formative input into the specification, the way this section is phrased
is not acceptable. If the contributor wish[es], and if under these terms
their contributions merits participation
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Last and final objection, I want to make sure I am not missing something...
the contract between the spec participants is or is not public? If public,
was there a link I missed? If so, can it be added to the proposal for
completeness sake?
Bill
William, to
Some ideas that have come from random places / discussions / water
cooler / ...
Carl.
Digery
http://www.arts.ualberta.ca/~tbutler/trips/Oz-2006Jan/05-Oz-photos/wildlife%20-%20digery%20doo.jpg
natter is the English borrowed word you are looking for to describe it
Tjata (swedish for
I thought I had fixed this, will get guest reset shortly
Carl.
Paul Fremantle wrote:
Hi Glasgow Proposers
I tried to check out the AMQP code from the Redhat website:
svn checkout https://etp.108.redhat.com/svn/etp/trunk/blaze/
--username guest
with the empty password for guest as described
Read Only access to the source code can be done with
userid - etpguest
password - guest
Wiki is also updated with this change, to fix Paul's access issue.
Carl.
Carl Trieloff wrote:
I thought I had fixed this, will get guest reset shortly
Carl.
Paul Fremantle wrote:
Hi Glasgow Proposers
I think we should maybe try get 3 or 4 top picks for names, and then
check that these meet
the incubator sniff test and then do a trademark search on those, which
will most likely
narrow the search to 1 out of the 4.
Carl.
Kim van der Riet wrote:
In the acronym dept., how about:
AMQE
+1 for Kyma easy to say, read and use in code.
Archit Shah wrote:
More name ideas for Glasgow (and maybe for others as well):
Bernoulli (messages flow)
Cumin (spice)
Kyma (wave)
Leno (an open-woven fabric)
Linum (flax)
Pharos (lighthouse)
Subito (at once)
-- Archit Shah
Maybe I should ask the following, does anyone from the Apache perspective
have a objection to Qpid?
I think Qpid is fine for a name and if there are not Apache naming
objections then
I can have a trademark search done on it get that feedback for the list.
Carl.
Sakala, Adinarayana wrote:
I think we have a new name, we need to come to agreement
on how to do the CaPs.
a.) Qpid
b.) QPid
c.) QPID
I like a, then c.
Carl.
sophitia que wrote:
I am +1 on the name.
On 8/10/06, Craig L Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 10, 2006, at 11:49 AM, Archit Shah wrote:
+1 for Qpid
yes, agree.
Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Carl,
Qpid when referring to the project in normal sentences, as in I like
this new Qpid project.
qpid for directory names, mailing lists, build artifacts, etc.
For me, CamelCaseMakesMyHeadSpin.
Craig
On Aug 11, 2006, at 8:14 AM, Carl Trieloff
If there are no more last comments on the name by COB, I will update the
proposal with
Qpid and we will use this for ASF resource setup.
Regards
Carl.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
I have completed the rename on the wiki from Blaze to Glasgow to Qpid. The
updated page (only the name and ASF resources to be setup have changed). The
new page can be found at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/QpidProposal
Project setup can now be done with Qpid for the name and qpid lowercase
Having been through this, may I suggest listing all the project
terms/values/etc and write a script
to randomly combines them -- (and yes we have a script that does this... :-)
The months of normal naming practices did not turn up a non
trademarked/place/etc name...
Carl.
Johnson, Eric
For development releases, it seems like it should be quite reasonable
and maybe needed to use
snapshots, however when doing a major release it would seem that you
would take all possible
effort not to use snapshots, and only use them if absolutely required.
Carl.
Paul Querna wrote:
John
Bhupendra Bhardwaj
Rafael Schloming
Carl Trieloff
Others
--
Suresh Kodichath
Frank Lynch
Sam Joyce
Tejeswar Das
Regards
Carl
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marnie McCormack
Steve Vinoski
Gordon Sim
Robert Grieg
Rajith Attapatta
John O'Hara
Bhupendra Bhardwaj
Rafael Schloming
Carl Trieloff
Others
--
Suresh Kodichath
Frank Lynch
Sam Joyce
Tejeswar Das
Regards
Carl
Brian McCallister wrote:
Concern:
Was there any resolution on the AMQP licensing terms (1) in relation
to making releases? I think it is okay, but how it fits into the
current draft guidelines (2) I am unsure. I think Cliff voted for
this, so I suspect it is okay. Just want to make sure :-)
I will leave the vote open it till Wednesday at which time I will
provide a summary of the final vote. Qpid has the votes required for
releasing, with vote running longer than 72 hours and thus would like to
provide notice of closing the vote Wednesday if there are any additional
votes.
Srinivas
Brian McCallister
Mentors
---
Cliff Schmitt
Paul Fremantle
PPMC
Alan Conway
Kim van der Riet
Martin Ritche
Marnie McCormack
Steve Vinoski
Gordon Sim
Robert Grieg
Rajith Attapatta
John O'Hara
Bhupendra Bhardwaj
Rafael Schloming
Carl Trieloff
Others
--
Suresh Kodichath
Frank Lynch
The Qpid M1 release has been placed at:
http://people.apache.org/dist/incubator/qpid/M1-incubating/java/
Download pages will be updated shortly
Regards
Carl.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Noel,
We created a report for Qpid. I guess that we mailed it to the wrong
location, where
should the report be sent for inclusion?
Carl
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
More and more ASF Members continue to join the Incubator PMC to help
shephard projects through the process. ActiveMQ is the
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Carl Trieloff wrote:
We created a report for Qpid. I guess that we mailed it to the wrong
location, where should the report be sent for inclusion?
The Wiki is the staging area for the report, or you can post to [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Where did you send
Fixed typo in-line...
Carl Trieloff wrote:
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Carl Trieloff wrote:
We created a report for Qpid. I guess that we mailed it to the wrong
location, where should the report be sent for inclusion?
The Wiki is the staging area for the report, or you can post
Brian,
It would be fantastic to have you help us out in Qpid if you can make it
happen.
regards
Carl.
Brian McCallister wrote:
On Apr 10, 2007, at 10:58 PM, Brian McCallister wrote:
If someone can step up to help OpenJPA I will trade off :-)
I haven't been a fantastic mentor for
Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
The reports from the following projects are still missing:
FtpServer
Heraldry
Ivy
JuiCE
Lucene.Net
NMaven
Qpid
Please add your reports to http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2007.
PS. The TripleSoup and UIMA reports are missing the incubating
Please could a IPMC member help us with the IPMC 3rd vote for this committer
Carl.
Paul Fremantle wrote:
+1 from me
Paul
On 4/10/07, Cliff Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/15/07, Marnie McCormack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
This vote closed on Tuesday night and the result is
Please could a IPMC member help us with the IPMC 3rd vote for this committer
Carl.
Paul Fremantle wrote:
+1 from me.
Paul
On 4/10/07, Cliff Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/15/07, Marnie McCormack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
This vote closed on Tuesday night and the result is as
Please could a IPMC member help us with the IPMC 3rd vote for this committer
Carl.
Paul Fremantle wrote:
+1 from me.
Paul
On 4/10/07, Cliff Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/15/07, Marnie McCormack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
This vote closed on Tuesday night and the result is as
and we are still a mentor short.
Regards
On 12/04/07, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brian,
It would be fantastic to have you help us out in Qpid if you can
make it
happen.
regards
Carl.
Brian McCallister wrote:
On Apr 10, 2007, at 10:58 PM, Brian McCallister wrote
van der Riet
Martin Ritchie
Rupert Smith
Gordon Sim
Robert Grieg
Robert Godfrey
Carl Trieloff
Rafael Schloming
0 vote:
Yoav Shapira
Vote thread -- note two links as I first incorrectly posted without
[vote], added [vote] minutes later...
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-qpid
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
If your private@ list vote had three +1s from IPMC members (e.g.
your mentors), then IMO all you need to do is inform the IPMC of
the vote when complete.
Should probably notify the PMC at the time of the vote.
the request for an account
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Carl Trieloff wrote:
A suggestion that one of our mentors had made to us was to do a poll for
concerns on the private list to see if PPMC was happy with the committer
to be added to the project (notice and to see if any of PPMC have
concerns). If all went well
One more question on this topic as I have also seen differing views from
different members of the Incubator PMC on: Who can and who can not
send the account setup mail to root?
Given each new committer vote will have 3 PMC votes, why does a mentor
have to send the account setup to root?
Craig L Russell wrote:
Hi Carl,
On May 30, 2007, at 6:14 AM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
One more question on this topic as I have also seen differing views
from different members of the Incubator PMC on: Who can and who can
not send the account setup mail to root?
Given each new committer vote
Coping incubator general and apache legal lists on this thread for
additional comments on this topic.
Carl.
John O'Hara wrote:
Yes, IBM are I fully paid up licensee of Java technology - and can do
whatever they like with it.
I asked permission of IBM if we could implement the XMS API some
We could add rules indefinitely to make just about anyone not usable...
I don't have any issues
with Pig.
Carl.
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hey,
On 9/24/07, Doug Cutting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
a) The name Pig is somewhat provocative (not kosher/halal) and I
Top-posting as it is related but different question. I would like to
contribute to the
apache legal questions/ answers / discussing. What is the process for
joining
apache legal?
(I am not a lawyer)
Carl.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Keep in mind, Sun stuff wasn't necessarily handled under
J Aaron Farr wrote:
Ting Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now, we are going to move our project BlueSky (Blue Sky Distance
Collaboration System) to Apache Incubator for future development...
你好
The proposal is interesting, but I have a few concerns.
I can't get to
Just to make sure I understand what is happening here - Yoko is going
away/ending and getting
merged into Geronimo and CXF?
Carl.
Alexey Petrenko wrote:
+1
2007/12/11, Matt Hogstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Below is a proposal that was discussed and brought forward by the Yoko
Community.
agree that rename is required.
Carl.
Paul Fremantle wrote:
Hans
My understanding is that you do need to change the package names, but
I'd like to see who else chimes in here.
Any decent Java IDE will rename the packages and fix up the code
without too much hassle.
Paul
On 1/22/08, Hans
Craig L Russell wrote:
I think it's confusing people to use the term binding in different
contexts. I'd like to propose that the term is only used to refer to
decisions/votes that are binding on The Apache Software Foundation,
which means decisions/votes made by a duly authorized PMC.
In
are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
Apache Qpid PMC:
Alan Conway
Arnaud Simon
Carl Trieloff
Gordon Sim
John O'Hara
Marnie McCormack
Martin Ritchie
Rafael Schloming
Rajith Attapattu
Robert Greig
Robert Godfrey
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Carl
Trieloff be and hereby
Guillaume Nodet wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Carl Trieloff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RESOLVED, that the Apache Qpid PMC be and hereby is responsible
for the creation and maintenance of the Qpid Messaging implementations,
clients and related software components, based on software
to be discharged of responsibility.
Craig
On Feb 28, 2008, at 6:20 AM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
The Qpid community has being working through the process to graduate.
Before we
formally have one of our mentors start the vote on the Incubator
lists we would like
to invite any additional comments
* Arnaud Simon
* Carl Trieloff
* Gordon Sim
* John O'Hara
* Marnie McCormack
* Martin Ritchie
* Rafael Schloming
* Rajith Attapattu
* Robert Greig
* Robert Godfrey
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that
Carl
Yoav Shapira wrote:
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 7:33 AM, Santiago Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
less awareness of their activity in both directions. The worse part of
it is that the lack of awareness will probably reduce the probability of
any of the PMC members to be nominated for ASF
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
