When generating your reports for the Board Meetings, please don't
forget to add some useful information. For example:
o Date of Incubation
o General focus of podling
o Remaining items to accomplish for graduation.
Some examples from last month include Hama, Kato and Log4php
Should I be concerned that the initial size of the PMC is just
5 people?
Even so, +1
On Oct 17, 2009, at 9:39 PM, Bob Schellink wrote:
Hi all,
The Apache Click community has voted to request graduation from the
Incubator as a new TLP [1][2].
I would like to start a vote to recommend the
On Oct 18, 2009, at 5:06 PM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
Hello Jim,
many Apache projects have shown that small PMCs can work as
effectively (or
sometimes even more effective) than bigger PMCs.
I didn't say I *was* worried... I just asked should I be... ;)
+1.
Like to join as well.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On Oct 28, 2009, at 2:39 PM, Paul Querna wrote:
Libcloud proposal thread went well, and we added several mentors. I
would like to start the vote to incubate Libcloud into the ASF.
The proposal is included below and is also at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/LibcloudProposal
Please cast
On Nov 4, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
The Subversion project would like to join the Apache Software
Foundation to remove the overhead of having to run its own
corporation. The Subversion project is already run quite like an
Apache project, and already counts a number of ASF Members
On Nov 11, 2009, at 5:35 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Dan,
It's up to each project to get their releases correct - Yes. But not
everyone hangs out on the d...@maven or gene...@incubator. Hence the request
to broadcast.
I really don't understand the why? - No one is trying to mandate
On Nov 13, 2009, at 1:27 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Greg Stein wrote:
IIRC, Martijn has offered a proper legal review in the place of a
release.
This sounded pretty reasonable to me. I would agree to that.
Yup. I've already stated that I have no problems with running RAT and
working
Looks like the trademark issues are being resolved, so
+1 !
On Feb 11, 2010, at 11:08 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
Hello all,
I started a discussion thread a week-ish ago to seek out issues for
Subversion's graduation. The couple bits that were raised[1] have been
handled, I believe. So with
+1
On Mar 4, 2010, at 4:18 AM, Gav... wrote:
Hi All,
The Log4PHP community has voted [1] with 5 +1 votes and no other votes as
follows, to graduate to become a sub-project of the Logging Project.
* Gavin McDonald
* Christian Hammers
* Jim Jagielski
* Jesus Christian (non binding
+1
On Mar 5, 2010, at 2:21 PM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
Hi,
The Traffic Server PPMC has voted on and approved the release of TS
v2.0.0-alpha. We would now like to request the approval from the Incubator
PMC for this release. The original vote thread is
Message-ID:
On Mar 10, 2010, at 11:10 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote:
Please vote on releasing this package as Apache
trafficserver-incubating-2.0.0-alpha:
[ ] +1 Publish
[ ] 0 Abstain
[ ] -1 Don't publish, because...
+1 for release
+1
On Apr 10, 2010, at 5:35 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 4/9/2010 6:54 PM, Bryan Call wrote:
Incubation status:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/trafficserver.html
Please cast your vote:
[X] +1 to recommend Traffic Server's graduation
+1
On Apr 19, 2010, at 2:46 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I'm not all to familiar with what the next steps should be.
Update the status page, move the project on the projects index (probably
retired is correct, rather than dormant) to reflect the change.
I assume the wsrp4j mailing list
+1 !
On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Tobias Schlitt wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
please find below our proposal for Zeta Components. The proposal is also
available in the wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ZetaComponentsProposal
Regards,
+1
On Jul 5, 2010, at 1:15 PM, Ben Dewey wrote:
Hi,
The Apache Stonehenge community has voted for the M2 release of Apache
Stonehenge. We are now asking the approval from the Incubator PMC to publish
the release.
Stonehenge is a set of example applications for Service Oriented
+1
On Aug 20, 2010, at 2:04 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
+1
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 16:51, Bryan Duxbury br...@rapleaf.com wrote:
Hi all,
In all the time it took for us to finally release Thrift 0.3, we've
accumulated enough changes for Thrift 0.4!
I propose we accept
+1: binding
On Sep 1, 2010, at 5:42 AM, Dan Haywood wrote:
The Isis proposal has now been updated with a champion and several new
mentors (thanks again guys), and is ready to be voted on.
The proposal is at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/IsisProposal , the text
is also copied below.
On Sep 8, 2010, at 1:22 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 20:29, Matthew Sacks matt...@matthewsacks.comwrote:
...
*Mailing Lists*
kitty-dev
kitty-commits
kitty-user
Is there a large user community already? If not, then splitting the
community across dev/user does not
-tomcat
Initial Committers
Matthew Sacks (matt...@glasscodeinc.com)
Peary Chiu (pearyc...@gmail.com)
Jim Jagielski (j...@jimgjag.com)
Stuart Williams (p...@pidster.com)
Required Resources
• Subversion
• Jira
• Wiki
• Website Space
• Hudson
Mailing
+1 (binding)
On Sep 15, 2010, at 3:20 AM, msacks wrote:
At the advisement of the list, we have created a brand-new thread here
for voting on the kitty proposal.
The wiki page is located at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/KittyProposal
Thanks.
I still don't see how that gets around the perception, and the
reality, that development is being done outside the list.
So I don't see that proposal as helping out at all...
On Sep 16, 2010, at 3:27 PM, Scott Deboy wrote:
I understand the concern raised by the use of real-time communication
By definition, ANY such meeting will exclude some people; it's just the
nature of the beast. Anyone not in that timezone either will not be
able to attend or will need to go out of their way to attend. As
such, it is *very* easy to disenfranchise large groups of people,
esp if the Skype chat is
.
--benson
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
By definition, ANY such meeting will exclude some people; it's just the
nature of the beast. Anyone not in that timezone either will not be
able to attend or will need to go out of their way to attend
+1 (binding)
On Nov 30, 2010, at 1:52 AM, Dan Peterson wrote:
Hi everyone,
Please vote on the acceptance of Wave into the Apache incubator.
The proposal is available at: http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/WaveProposal
(for your convenience, a snapshot is also copied below)
The earlier
+1 (binding)
On Jan 25, 2011, at 5:24 PM, Marcel Offermans wrote:
+1
Greetings, Marcel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
+1 (binding)
On Jan 27, 2011, at 1:05 AM, Troy Howard wrote:
All,
Since posting the Lucene.Net Incubator proposal announcement on Jan
12th, we now have three mentors signed up and would like to call a
vote to accept Lucene.Net into the Apache Incubator.
The proposal is included below and
+1 (binding)
On Feb 14, 2011, at 1:20 PM, David Lutterkort wrote:
Hi all,
I just uploaded a release candidate for Deltacloud 0.2.0. The rc is
available from http://people.apache.org/~lutter/deltacloud/0.2.0/rc2/
Please vote on whether this should become the official 0.2.0 release by
We're looking for one more binding +1...
On Feb 14, 2011, at 1:20 PM, David Lutterkort wrote:
Hi all,
I just uploaded a release candidate for Deltacloud 0.2.0. The rc is
available from http://people.apache.org/~lutter/deltacloud/0.2.0/rc2/
Please vote on whether this should become the
On Feb 21, 2011, at 11:34 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:23 AM, Mark Struberg strub...@yahoo.de wrote:
I'm not really fit with ruby projects, but there are quite a few sources
with LGPL license headers. e.g.
./lib/deltacloud/drivers/opennebula/opennebula_driver.rb
+1
On Apr 19, 2011, at 5:01 PM, David Lutterkort wrote:
Hi all,
I just uploaded the third release candidate for Deltacloud 0.3.0. The rc is
available from http://people.apache.org/~lutter/deltacloud/0.3.0/rc3/
This RC fixes a critical bug in the EC2 driver.
Please vote on the release
+1 (binding)
On May 15, 2011, at 10:42 PM, Tomaz Muraus wrote:
OK, sorry for the confusion, but apparently I need to open a separate voting
thread so here it is.
Here is also a list of people who have already voted +1 in the proposal
thread which can be found at
On Jun 1, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
There is a statement that Oracle will assist in the transition and migration
from OpenOffice.org., I am probably reading too much into it, but why is
there not a statement that Oracle intend to continue development once the
transition is
On Jun 1, 2011, at 12:41 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 01/06/2011 17:28, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jun 1, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
There is a statement that Oracle will assist in the transition and
migration from OpenOffice.org., I am probably reading too much
On Jun 1, 2011, at 1:13 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
For sure, we need to add people. I expect that we will get
quite a bunch interested. After all, this was all kept
hush-hush. Now that the cat is out of the bag, we will for
sure see that list grow.
FWIW, I have contacted the 2 main people
Begin forwarded message:
From: Jim Jagielski j...@apache.org
Date: June 1, 2011 2:33:15 PM EDT
To: Louis Suarez-Potts lsuarezpo...@gmail.com
Cc: Italo Vignoli italo.vign...@documentfoundation.org, Sam Ruby
ru...@apache.org
Subject: Re: OpenOffice and the ASF
message-id: ecff3ecc-1c0c
FYI:
Begin forwarded message:
From: Louis Suarez-Potts lsuarezpo...@gmail.com
Date: June 1, 2011 2:58:02 PM EDT
To: Jim Jagielski j...@apache.org
Cc: Louis Suarez-Potts lsuarezpo...@gmail.com, Italo Vignoli
italo.vign...@documentfoundation.org, Sam Ruby ru...@apache.org
Subject: Re
On Jun 1, 2011, at 3:27 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 15:04, eric b eric.bach...@free.fr wrote:
Hi,
First, apologies for the new thread, due to my late arrival on this list.
As developer for OpenOffice.org since 2005, and having some knowledge in OOo
source code, I'm
More info re TDF and LOo
- Forwarded message from Italo Vignoli
italo.vign...@documentfoundation.org -
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 23:16:53 +0200
From: Italo Vignoli italo.vign...@documentfoundation.org
Reply-To: italo.vign...@documentfoundation.org
To: Jim Jagielski j...@apache.org
CC: Louis
On Jun 2, 2011, at 12:40 AM, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
-- One thing that struck me today is that it is almost arcane mystical
knowledge, for anyone outside of Apache, how exactly to affix their name
in support of this proposal as a proposed initial committer, or even that
this was
Threads are fine, as long as they are really threads ;)
On Jun 2, 2011, at 1:25 AM, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Dumb question. Are we obligated to converse like this, in a single email
thread, for the duration of the proposal review process? Is this an
organizing principle? Would I
Weir --- IBM
Sponsors
Sam Ruby, Geir Magnusson, Sally Khudairi
Champion
Sam Ruby, Apache Foundation
Nominated Mentors
Jim Jagielski --Apache
Sponsoring Entity
The Apache Incubator
On Jun 1, 2011, at 10:58 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 6/1/2011 8:41 PM, Louis Suarez-Potts wrote:
My questions then are absolutely pragmatic and relate—hence the to post—to
issues not so far discussed:
* Apache Foundation owns the trademark to OOo?
* We at OOo receive lots of
On Jun 2, 2011, at 9:21 AM, Simon Brouwer wrote:
I had already been so bold as to adding myself to the list, expressing my
support to the proposal. I was wondering though. In the OpenOffice.org
project, many community members contribute in other ways than committing
code, for example by
On Jun 2, 2011, at 10:07 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
Sure - there are lots of nice side effects of rationalisation and so
on, it all sounds good. But unfortunately IBM's move here is not
primarily focused on that - otherwise (surely) it would work with TDF -
where it has been made
On Jun 2, 2011, at 10:40 AM, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
No one is forcing LibreOffice members to do anything. You are free to
disagree with my goals, my priorities or even my methods and simply say,
No thanks without suggesting that it is immoral for anyone else,
including your own
On Jun 2, 2011, at 10:40 AM, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
I'd like to think that no one is working on LibreOffice merely because
they have no choice, or that giving everyone a choice is seen as being
antagonistic. If truly 100% of the LibreOffice members prefer TDF to
Apache, then you
Guys, if we are going to argue over the mistakes of the pasts
and the slights of the past, quite frankly, we aren't going to
get very far.
This is supposed to be a happy occasion; let's not bicker
and argue about who-killed-who... :)
On Jun 2, 2011, at 11:11 AM, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
On Jun 2, 2011, at 11:16 AM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
To answer Jim's email, I think that while OOo and LibreOffice don't have to
be competitors, I would not necessarily want to decide why we should split
development efforts. I 'm sure the Apache Foundation has experience in
dealing with
On Jun 2, 2011, at 11:35 AM, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
As it doesn't fundamentally change the matter - this was a missed
opportunity to reunite.
If we all agree on that point, can we please move on?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Jun 2, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Ian Lynch wrote:
On 2 June 2011 16:49, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Jun 2, 2011, at 11:35 AM, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
As it doesn't fundamentally change the matter - this was a missed
opportunity to reunite.
If we all agree on that point, can
On Jun 2, 2011, at 12:09 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Jun 2, 2011, at 11:35 AM, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
As it doesn't fundamentally change the matter - this was a missed
opportunity to reunite.
If we all agree
On Jun 2, 2011, at 12:31 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
??? I simply cannot grok the above as a response to my
comment... huh?
Apologies if I misunderstood. The way I read the exchange was:
this was a missed
On Jun 2, 2011, at 3:34 PM, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Sense 2 is a but more subjective, since each person might have their own
vision of what the ideal community would look like.
Let's look at it this way: Pretend that when things starting going
south in OOo, but before TDF was formed,
On Jun 2, 2011, at 4:03 PM, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
That's a tough one, Jim :-)
It's what I do :)
my personal feeling (I'm not speaking
on behalf of TDF on this one) is that we didn't have enough time/opportunity
to understand each other more. And now, we are looking at a hairball that
On Jun 2, 2011, at 8:12 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
TL;DR version: I think I see people talking past each other for a bunch of
reasons, and I have a compromise proposal that might make things easier. It's
at the bottom, and explained in some detail in the middle.
Welcome to the discussion.
On Jun 3, 2011, at 2:13 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
I don't see any of this discussion about numbers being helpful, only
divisive. My numbers are right. No, they're not. See? But those numbers
are too small.
Get over it already, people. Find something substative to discuss.
Agreed... if we
On Jun 3, 2011, at 10:05 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi Rob,
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 21:26 -0400, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Finally, I think we're exaggerating the difficulty of getting out a
release of OpenOfice. LibreOffice did it very quickly. And so did IBM
with Symphony. This is
Of course it does... but we are discussing ways where
we can use all aspects of the existing communities to
give the IPMC a warm-and-fuzzy regarding voting +1
On Jun 3, 2011, at 11:04 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
Um, it seems to me that this discussion of builds and distribution
belongs on the
On Jun 3, 2011, at 11:09 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 03/06/2011 16:00, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Stupid question time: If TDF already has the *build* infrastructure,
then isn't *that* a clear choice of where at least some level of
cooperation can occur.
After all, the ASF provides
On Jun 3, 2011, at 11:09 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
Please see Simon Phipps' email earlier today that contained a very similar
suggestion with some more detail, it would be nice to bring these two threads
together.
Simon's email, from what I can tell, boils down to:
1. The podling goes
On Jun 3, 2011, at 12:06 PM, Ross Gardler wrote:
On 03/06/2011 16:43, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jun 3, 2011, at 11:09 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
Please see Simon Phipps' email earlier today that contained a very similar
suggestion with some more detail, it would be nice to bring these two
On Jun 3, 2011, at 1:36 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
and especially to use the trademark (which is the only actual asset being
transferred) for everyone's good.
And as a tangible, valuable asset, the ASF cannot, as a 501(c)3
non-profit just give it away to just anyone... in general,
the
On Jun 3, 2011, at 1:36 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
On 3 Jun 2011, at 17:52, Ian Lynch wrote:
Hi Florian,
I do see with great concern is the need for a second project to be set-up
at Apache or any other entity.
Thing is that this is done, Oracle didn't and won't now give the IP to
On Jun 3, 2011, at 1:57 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 13:50, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 6:21 PM, Noel J. Bergman n...@devtech.com wrote:
Which is why I raised the question regarding TDF's ability to relicense
all
of the contributions it
On Jun 3, 2011, at 2:12 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Cmon Jim, he wrote a lengthy monologue which spelled
out his position. As I read it, we could license
the OpenOffice trademark to the Document Foundation
for, as Simon put
On Jun 3, 2011, at 2:14 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
If I were voting on this incubator proposal (and of course I know I am not),
I would want to know that the people proposing it had a grasp of the
enormity of the task and a plan for dealing with it /from day one/ and not
from an undefined
, but the reason I am here on the
list is to be constructive and not to be bitch-slapped and misrepresented
just for showing up.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Cmon Joe, Simon's PoV has been clear from his tweets,
unless he has changed his mind... If I am mis
On Jun 3, 2011, at 2:30 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 6/3/2011 1:17 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
Are you ready to call for a vote? :)
I'm certainly not support OOo from 2 committers and 1 mentor.
...
Shane Sam, and some member of ComDev, if you would serve, please add
yourselves
On Jun 3, 2011, at 2:35 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
More than that, I'd like to see it as an objective to facilitate this
collaboration. There's too much talk of just giving up and treating
ideological division as a given...
Well, the ASF develops and releases software under the AL... that
On Jun 3, 2011, at 2:40 PM, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
I suggest you stick to the content of the e-mails on the list, Jim.
Yes, I am concerned about how this all came about, but the reason I am
here on the list is to be constructive and not to be bitch-slapped and
misrepresented just for
And I offer a personal apology to Simon...
On Jun 3, 2011, at 2:49 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jun 3, 2011, at 2:40 PM, Allen Pulsifer wrote:
I suggest you stick to the content of the e-mails on the list, Jim.
Yes, I am concerned about how this all came about, but the reason I am
here
On Jun 3, 2011, at 2:55 PM, Ian Lynch wrote:
Which is exactly why I say we are where we are and we should deal with it
even if it is to agree to disagree on some things. Can we work together and
resolve issues so that people can enjoy using FOSS office software? That is
really the
On Jun 3, 2011, at 3:00 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
I am not even thinking of suggesting it, any more than I would dream of
telling TDF they have to switch to another license. But I do believe there's
a need to focus *in the proposal* on exactly how to sustain the consumer
deliverable from
On Jun 3, 2011, at 3:44 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Jun 3, 2011, at 3:00 PM, Simon Phipps wrote:
I am not even thinking of suggesting it, any more than I would dream of
telling TDF they have to switch to another
Posts such as:
http://itmanagement.earthweb.com/osrc/article.php/3935136/LibreOffice-340-Released-as-OpenOffice-Heads-to-Apache.htm
certainly don't help. It just reinforces a perceived division
as well as almost forcing the other side to take a defensive
stance.
It's a shame.
On Jun 4, 2013, at 1:28 PM, Ramirez, Paul M (398J)
paul.m.rami...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
We're looking for developers and sponsors.
Sponsors??
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For
On Jun 12, 2013, at 7:32 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 2:10 AM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
It's with great pleasure that I invite the IPMC to review a new
proposal [1] for the Apache Incubator. Please let us know if you have
FWIW: IMO the Incubator still serves a crucial role in
the social and legal aspects of *creating* an Apache
project and community. The Probationary TLP opens us
up to more risk for what I can see as no real benefit
or reduction in effort or resources.
Also, the unwash public is aware of the
On Jun 14, 2013, at 9:31 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
Thanks for your comments Jim.
You will see from the archives that I share most of your concerns
about probationary TLPs. However a number of IPMC members have argued
strongly for the concept.
To be clear, the
On Jun 14, 2013, at 10:42 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (398J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
* pTLP are nothing different than what existed before there was an
Incubator. Yes we have more projects now. So what. We'll continue
to have more projects and those will eventually graduate to TLP,
On Jun 14, 2013, at 5:49 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1].
I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter
the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation
On Jun 16, 2013, at 10:04 PM, Andrew Bayer andrew.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
[ ] +1
[ ] 0
[ ] -1 (explain why)
+1 (binding) /* using mvn */
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional
If the idea of the 'Ombudsman' is sort of like an 'elder
Statesman' role as well, then I may be interested...
On Jun 20, 2013, at 4:29 AM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 01:44:14PM -0700, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Jun 19, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Alan Cabrera wrote:
+1
On Jul 1, 2013, at 11:27 AM, Chip Childers chip.child...@sungard.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 08:02:09AM -0700, Alan Cabrera wrote:
On Jun 30, 2013, at 7:42 AM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
Now that things have settled down a bit,
I'd like to talk about some of the
Anything ever come from this?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
Anglade timangl...@gmail.com (Apigee)
* Todd Nine todd.n...@gmail.com (Apigee)
* Jim Jagielski j...@apache.org (RedHat)
== Affiliations ==
* Apigee
* Korea Telecom
* Globo.com
* The Last Pickle
== Sponsors ==
=== Champion ===
Jim Jagielski j...@apache.org
=== Nominated Mentors
Start of next week I plan on starting a formal VOTE...
On Sep 17, 2013, at 9:58 AM, Alex Karasulu akaras...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Lieven Govaerts
lieven.govae...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP ...
As I'm setting up a similar infrastructure for a mobile application
BaaS and
the set of services provided by Apache Stratos (incubating) to developers
of apps. I'm very happy to see this come to ASF and will be happy to mentor
if you guys need another one.
Cheers,
Sanjiva.
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I
misunderstanding
can happen in the most innocuous ways.
On Sep 22, 2013, at 6:58 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana sanj...@wso2.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Luciano Resende luckbr1...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Certainly
Jin sun...@softwaregeeks.org (Korea Telecom)
* Tim Anglade timangl...@gmail.com (Apigee)
* Todd Nine todd.n...@gmail.com (Apigee)
* Jim Jagielski j...@apache.org (RedHat)
== Affiliations ==
* Apigee
* Korea Telecom
* Globo.com
* The Last Pickle
== Sponsors ==
=== Champion ===
Jim
PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Of course collaboration and cross-pollination is important and should
be encouraged. However, I didn't want the podling to think that
Stratos, at the expense of other PaaS offerings, was to be
a priority. I'm sure you understand the importance
Did you see what you replied too?? propose a vote and
the subject sez [VOTE]. :)
On Sep 23, 2013, at 12:03 PM, Sanjiva Weerawarana sanj...@wso2.com wrote:
Are you going to start a VOTE thread?
+1 in any case :-).
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 11:46 PM, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Did you see what you replied too?? propose a vote and
the subject sez [VOTE]. :)
It's probably an email client issue. From the `Message-Id
Farrell jfarr...@apache.org wrote:
Jim
Do you need any additional mentors for this?
-Jake
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Did you see what you replied too?? propose a vote and
the subject sez [VOTE]. :)
On Sep 23, 2013, at 12:03 PM, Sanjiva
and different IaaSes.
Nirmal Fernando,
PPMC Member and Committer of Apache Stratos,
Senior Software Engineer, WSO2
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
I would like to propose Usergrid, a multi-tenant Backend-as-a-Service
stack for web mobile
+1. I'll add you to the proposal
On Sep 24, 2013, at 8:54 AM, Jake Farrell jfarr...@apache.org wrote:
I would be interested in helping as a mentor for Usergrid if slots are
available
-Jake
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Sanjiva has expressed
All done. Thx!
On Sep 24, 2013, at 9:24 AM, Sanjiva Weerawarana sanj...@wso2.com wrote:
Yes I was volunteering to mentor .. please add me.
Sanjiva.
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Sanjiva has expressed interest in helping out as a mentor
Added.
On Sep 24, 2013, at 9:24 AM, Nirmal Fernando nirmal070...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jim,
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
No problem... usually, when someone simply sez they are interested
in contributing, I take that as an indication that when
: 94112793140 | Mobile:94112793140
dulit...@gmail.com |http://dulithawijewantha.com
On Sep 24, 2013, at 7:05 PM, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
Added.
On Sep 24, 2013, at 9:24 AM, Nirmal Fernando nirmal070...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jim,
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Jim Jagielski j
1 - 100 of 752 matches
Mail list logo
