+1 (non-binding)
...ant
Paul Fremantle wrote:
Hi
Based on the feedback from Robert we have done the following changes:
1) Added a NOTICE.txt and LICENSE.txt in the binary and src distributions.
2) Added NOTICE and LICENSE to the meta-inf of the JAR
3) Put full info in the MANIFEST.MF
4) Rena
Is pulling this M1 release really necessary? I was under the impression that
right now it _is_ ok to be redistributing the NPL 1.1 licensed Rhino binary.
Back in August last year the ASF board Special Order 6B, Allow
redistribution of MPL- and NPL-licensed executables, was approved by
unanimous co
+1 (non-binding)
...ant
On 6/27/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 from me.
On 6/26/06, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The Synapse incubator would like to ask the Incubator PMC to
> > release the
> > Synapse project into the Apache Web Services PMC. Synapse h
A (non-binding) +1 from me to say thanks for the Tuscany votes.
FYI, the README.txt files in each example in the examples folder have
incorrect URLs to the website example pages. Eg,
http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/Basic should be
http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/basic.html. Other th
How timely...i've just spent the last hour or two today looking at AsyncWeb
after Dan Diephouse telling me about it at ApacheCon in Dublin. I'm
interested how this could be used by Tuscany or Synapse, so moving it to
Apache sounds good to me.
...ant
On 7/3/06, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
ul 02, 2006 at 07:08:48PM +0100, ant elder wrote:
> A (non-binding) +1 from me to say thanks for the Tuscany votes.
Huh what? Exactly what semantics attach to a "+1" is always a muddy
discussion, but IMNSHO they really ought not be "thanks for something
+1 (non-binding)
All the packaging etc of this release looks ok to me (though I still can't
get the web service sample to work, I'll raise a JIRA about that).
This vote has been going a week now, could any more of you with binding
votes spare a bit of time to review and vote on the release?
Sure ok, I'll volunteer to have a go. What doc do you have in mind?
...ant
On 7/30/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the organisation's starting to improve a little which should make it
easier to collaborate. i can think of quite a few tasks many of which
are editorial and
Tuscany has voted in Kelvin as a committer, could an account be created for
him please.
Preferred userid: kelvin
Full name: Kelvin James Goodson
Forwarding email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Requested Karma for: ws ws-tuscany
ICLA has been submitted and now appears on
http://people.apache.org/~jim/commit
**Tuscany has voted in Venkat as a committer, could an account be created
for him please.
Preferred userid: svkrish
Full Name: S Venkatakrishnan
Forwarding email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Requested Karma for: ws ws-tuscany
Vote thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/
A non-binding +1 from me. Any more IPMCers have time to check out and vote
on this so we get the magic 3?
...ant
On 10/24/06, Andrew Borley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We have held a vote on tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org to publish a new
milestone release of
the Tuscany C++ implementation. The v
On 11/3/06, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if I could draw your attention to this vote ratification
please?
Nobody has raised any show-stopping objections to any of the content. On
the
other hand, nobody has voted yet. I have been reading all the helpful
suggestions ma
gt; Paul Fremantle
> Deepal Jayasinghe
> Rajith Attapattu
> Asankha Perera
> Tijs Rademakers
> Ant Elder
> Ruwan Linton
> Saminda Aberuwan
> Davanum Srinivas
> Jaliya Ekanayake
> Glen Daniels
>
> The code is here:
> http://people.apache.org/~pzf/synapse/0.90-R
What is the current recommended best practice for a podling to vote in a new
committer?
The "Voting in a new committer" section at
http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html
it suggests a private discussion followed by a public pro-forma vote, and it
has a link to discussion thread about this [
Preferred userid: slaws
Full name: Simon Laws
Forwarding email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Requested Karma for: ws-tuscany
ICLA is on file
Result email and vote thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg13211.html
Many thanks,
...ant
On 2/25/07, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Feb 23, 2007, at 10:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: rfeng
> Date: Fri Feb 23 22:26:55 2007
> New Revision: 511225
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=511225
> Log:
> [sca-integration-branch] Add EJB reference bindi
FWIW, on the incubating projects I've helped with AFAIR there's never been
anyone who complained the separate incubator repository was confusing or
caused any problems. Also, most of the time we build in offline mode so the
performance of the separate repository isn't really an issue.
There is on
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 3/17/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Niclas,
Here the scenario is a project with all committers from one employer
and regular releases.
Are you talking about Tuscany still? Not all the Tuscany committers are from
the one employer. There's 25 committers
We're still looking for a couple more votes on this, anyone got some time to
have a look?
...ant
On 5/2/07, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 from me
Paul
On 5/2/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Tuscany community held a vote to release Apache Tuscany SDO versi
IPMCers, the Apache Tuscany project asks your permission to release the
Tuscany Java SCA 0.90-incubating release.
The tuscany-dev list vote for the release passed with 7 +1s:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg18279.html
The artifacts, including the binary and source distributions,
"When a distribution contains code under several licenses, the LICENSE file
should contain details of all these licenses. For each component which is
not Apache licensed, details of the component and the license under which
the component is distributed should be appended to the LICENSE file."
See
On 5/29/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/27/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IPMCers, the Apache Tuscany project asks your permission to release the
> Tuscany Java SCA 0.90-incubating release.
>
> The tuscany-dev list vote for the r
After more than 72 hours this vote has passed with 3 +1s from:
Robert Burrell Donkin
Davanum Srinivas
Paul Fremantle
Thanks for voting,
...ant
On 5/30/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Carl Trieloff wrote:
> One more question on this topic as I have also seen differing views from
> different members of the Incubator PMC on: "Who can and who can not
> send the account setup mail to root?"
The view that counts is from
htt
The Apache Tuscany team are pleased to announce the 0.90-incubating release
of the Java SCA project.
Apache Tuscany provides a runtime based on the Service Component
Architecture. SCA is a set of specifications aimed at simplifying SOA
Application Development which are being standardized at OASIS
On 6/7/07, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My apologies if I'm resurrecting something that was discussed extensively.
It has been pointed out to me that:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-57
The actual votes are held on the private lists. I'm not sure I
understand that.
Preferred userid: ... agrove
Full name:... Andrew Grove
Forwarding email address: ... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Requested UNIX groups: ws-tuscany
CLA is on file.
Vote: http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg13754.html
Note, I believe I'm authorised to make this requ
On 6/30/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The thread has died down with no consensus, so I'm going to try again.
Regarding how a Podling can get a "new to Apache" committer. First,
the rules:
1. Only the Incubator PMC can vote in a new committer, with three +1
and no -1 votes reco
+1
...ant
On 7/12/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please can I make another appeal to IPMC members to consider the
referenced
vote for karma for Fuhwei and cast their binding votes. We have consensus
from the project itself, but we need the IPMC members binding votes
before
w
On 7/16/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We held a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to publish a second
alpha release of Ivy.
The vote email thread is available here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg01175.html<
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00685.html>
In
Dear root,
Please create an id for Fuhwei Lwo:
Preferred userid: fuhwei
Full name: Fuhwei Lwo
Forwarding email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Requested Karma for: ws-tuscany
ICLA is on file
Result email and vote thread:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200707.mbox/[EMAIL
PR
Looks ok to me now so +1.
...ant
On 7/18/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Robert,
Thanks for taking a look and posting your observations.
- The javadocs are not supposed to be there in the maven repo. They
seemed to have crept in by mistake. I have now deleted them.
-
+1
...ant
On 7/20/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Any other IPMC member wants to vote?
On 7/13/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The ServiceMix podling respectfully requests the Incubator to consider
> its graduation to a Top Level Project. Please vote on recom
+1 from me.
Some of the same comments on the previous M7a release still apply, eg, its
preferred to have a separate DISCLAIMER file, having all licenses in a
single LICENSE file, and have src and binary distro's unpack into different
folders.
...ant
On 7/30/07, Graham Turrell (gmail) <[EMAIL
On 7/31/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 7/31/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > +1 from me.
> >
> > Some of the same comments on the previous M7a release still apply, eg,
> > its
> > preferred to have a separat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-33?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13672933#comment-13672933
]
ant elder commented on PODLINGNAMESEARCH-33:
The Incubator pod
501 - 536 of 536 matches
Mail list logo