Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve Synapse M2 release

2006-06-01 Thread ant elder
+1 (non-binding) ...ant Paul Fremantle wrote: Hi Based on the feedback from Robert we have done the following changes: 1) Added a NOTICE.txt and LICENSE.txt in the binary and src distributions. 2) Added NOTICE and LICENSE to the meta-inf of the JAR 3) Put full info in the MANIFEST.MF 4) Rena

Re: [RESULT] Request to release (revised) Tuscany M1

2006-06-01 Thread ant elder
Is pulling this M1 release really necessary? I was under the impression that right now it _is_ ok to be redistributing the NPL 1.1 licensed Rhino binary. Back in August last year the ASF board Special Order 6B, Allow redistribution of MPL- and NPL-licensed executables, was approved by unanimous co

Re: [VOTE] Release Synapse

2006-06-30 Thread ant elder
+1 (non-binding) ...ant On 6/27/06, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 from me. On 6/26/06, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The Synapse incubator would like to ask the Incubator PMC to > > release the > > Synapse project into the Apache Web Services PMC. Synapse h

Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve the 3.0-M2 release of ServiceMix

2006-07-02 Thread ant elder
A (non-binding) +1 from me to say thanks for the Tuscany votes. FYI, the README.txt files in each example in the examples folder have incorrect URLs to the website example pages. Eg, http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/Basic should be http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/basic.html. Other th

Re: 'protocols' sub-module of MINA

2006-07-03 Thread ant elder
How timely...i've just spent the last hour or two today looking at AsyncWeb after Dan Diephouse telling me about it at ApacheCon in Dublin. I'm interested how this could be used by Tuscany or Synapse, so moving it to Apache sounds good to me. ...ant On 7/3/06, Trustin Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Re: Don't +1 lightly (was: Re: [VOTE] Incubator PMC to approve the 3.0-M2 release of ServiceMix)

2006-07-04 Thread ant elder
ul 02, 2006 at 07:08:48PM +0100, ant elder wrote: > A (non-binding) +1 from me to say thanks for the Tuscany votes. Huh what? Exactly what semantics attach to a "+1" is always a muddy discussion, but IMNSHO they really ought not be "thanks for something

Re: [VOTE] Request to release Tuscany C++ M1

2006-07-28 Thread ant elder
+1 (non-binding) All the packaging etc of this release looks ok to me (though I still can't get the web service sample to work, I'll raise a JIRA about that). This vote has been going a week now, could any more of you with binding votes spare a bit of time to review and vote on the release?

Re: [doc] any volunteers?

2006-07-30 Thread ant elder
Sure ok, I'll volunteer to have a go. What doc do you have in mind? ...ant On 7/30/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: the organisation's starting to improve a little which should make it easier to collaborate. i can think of quite a few tasks many of which are editorial and

Account request for new Tuscany committer: Kelvin Goodson

2006-08-07 Thread ant elder
Tuscany has voted in Kelvin as a committer, could an account be created for him please. Preferred userid: kelvin Full name: Kelvin James Goodson Forwarding email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Requested Karma for: ws ws-tuscany ICLA has been submitted and now appears on http://people.apache.org/~jim/commit

Account request - Venkat for Tuscany

2006-09-20 Thread ant elder
**Tuscany has voted in Venkat as a committer, could an account be created for him please. Preferred userid: svkrish Full Name: S Venkatakrishnan Forwarding email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Requested Karma for: ws ws-tuscany Vote thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/

Re: [VOTE] Request to release TuscanyC++ M2

2006-11-01 Thread ant elder
A non-binding +1 from me. Any more IPMCers have time to check out and vote on this so we get the magic 3? ...ant On 10/24/06, Andrew Borley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We have held a vote on tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org to publish a new milestone release of the Tuscany C++ implementation. The v

Re: [VOTE] - Ratify Tuscany PPMC vote to release SDO for Java M2 artifacts

2006-11-04 Thread ant elder
On 11/3/06, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I wonder if I could draw your attention to this vote ratification please? Nobody has raised any show-stopping objections to any of the content. On the other hand, nobody has voted yet. I have been reading all the helpful suggestions ma

Re: Take2: [VOTE] Release Synapse 0.90

2006-12-13 Thread ant elder
gt; Paul Fremantle > Deepal Jayasinghe > Rajith Attapattu > Asankha Perera > Tijs Rademakers > Ant Elder > Ruwan Linton > Saminda Aberuwan > Davanum Srinivas > Jaliya Ekanayake > Glen Daniels > > The code is here: > http://people.apache.org/~pzf/synapse/0.90-R

Best practice for voting in a new committer?

2007-01-15 Thread ant elder
What is the current recommended best practice for a podling to vote in a new committer? The "Voting in a new committer" section at http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html it suggests a private discussion followed by a public pro-forma vote, and it has a link to discussion thread about this [

Account request - new Tuscany committer - Simon Laws

2007-01-22 Thread ant elder
Preferred userid: slaws Full name: Simon Laws Forwarding email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Requested Karma for: ws-tuscany ICLA is on file Result email and vote thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg13211.html Many thanks, ...ant

Re: EJB code dump, was: svn commit: r511225 [1/4]

2007-02-25 Thread ant elder
On 2/25/07, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Feb 23, 2007, at 10:26 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Author: rfeng > Date: Fri Feb 23 22:26:55 2007 > New Revision: 511225 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=511225 > Log: > [sca-integration-branch] Add EJB reference bindi

Re: Killing the incubator m2 repository

2007-03-15 Thread ant elder
FWIW, on the incubating projects I've helped with AFAIR there's never been anyone who complained the separate incubator repository was confusing or caused any problems. Also, most of the time we build in offline mode so the performance of the separate repository isn't really an issue. There is on

Re: Incentive for Graduation

2007-03-17 Thread ant elder
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On 3/17/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Niclas, Here the scenario is a project with all committers from one employer and regular releases. Are you talking about Tuscany still? Not all the Tuscany committers are from the one employer. There's 25 committers

Re: [Vote] Ratify the release of Apache Tuscany SDO 1.0-incubating-beta1

2007-05-11 Thread ant elder
We're still looking for a couple more votes on this, anyone got some time to have a look? ...ant On 5/2/07, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 from me Paul On 5/2/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The Tuscany community held a vote to release Apache Tuscany SDO versi

[VOTE] Approve Tuscany Java SCA 0.90 release

2007-05-27 Thread ant elder
IPMCers, the Apache Tuscany project asks your permission to release the Tuscany Java SCA 0.90-incubating release. The tuscany-dev list vote for the release passed with 7 +1s: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg18279.html The artifacts, including the binary and source distributions,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ODE 1.0

2007-05-28 Thread ant elder
"When a distribution contains code under several licenses, the LICENSE file should contain details of all these licenses. For each component which is not Apache licensed, details of the component and the license under which the component is distributed should be appended to the LICENSE file." See

Re: [VOTE] Approve Tuscany Java SCA 0.90 release

2007-05-29 Thread ant elder
On 5/29/07, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/27/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IPMCers, the Apache Tuscany project asks your permission to release the > Tuscany Java SCA 0.90-incubating release. > > The tuscany-dev list vote for the r

[RESULT][VOTE] Approve Tuscany Java SCA 0.90 release

2007-05-31 Thread ant elder
After more than 72 hours this vote has passed with 3 +1s from: Robert Burrell Donkin Davanum Srinivas Paul Fremantle Thanks for voting, ...ant

Re: PPMC guidance on new committers

2007-06-01 Thread ant elder
On 5/30/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Carl Trieloff wrote: > One more question on this topic as I have also seen differing views from > different members of the Incubator PMC on: "Who can and who can not > send the account setup mail to root?" The view that counts is from htt

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Tuscany SCA Java 0.90 released

2007-06-05 Thread ant elder
The Apache Tuscany team are pleased to announce the 0.90-incubating release of the Java SCA project. Apache Tuscany provides a runtime based on the Service Component Architecture. SCA is a set of specifications aimed at simplifying SOA Application Development which are being standardized at OASIS

Re: Podling Committer policy

2007-06-07 Thread ant elder
On 6/7/07, Paul Fremantle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My apologies if I'm resurrecting something that was discussed extensively. It has been pointed out to me that: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-57 The actual votes are held on the private lists. I'm not sure I understand that.

Account request - new Tuscany committer - Andrew Grove

2007-06-25 Thread ant elder
Preferred userid: ... agrove Full name:... Andrew Grove Forwarding email address: ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] Requested UNIX groups: ws-tuscany CLA is on file. Vote: http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg13754.html Note, I believe I'm authorised to make this requ

Re: Incubator new committer redux

2007-07-01 Thread ant elder
On 6/30/07, Craig L Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The thread has died down with no consensus, so I'm going to try again. Regarding how a Podling can get a "new to Apache" committer. First, the rules: 1. Only the Incubator PMC can vote in a new committer, with three +1 and no -1 votes reco

Re: Notice of Tuscany vote for new Committer

2007-07-12 Thread ant elder
+1 ...ant On 7/12/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Please can I make another appeal to IPMC members to consider the referenced vote for karma for Fuhwei and cast their binding votes. We have consensus from the project itself, but we need the IPMC members binding votes before w

Re: [VOTE] Approve release of Ivy 2.0.0-alpha2-incubating

2007-07-16 Thread ant elder
On 7/16/07, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We held a vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] to publish a second alpha release of Ivy. The vote email thread is available here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg01175.html< http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00685.html> In

Apache ID Request for Tuscany committer - Fuhwei Lwo

2007-07-17 Thread ant elder
Dear root, Please create an id for Fuhwei Lwo: Preferred userid: fuhwei Full name: Fuhwei Lwo Forwarding email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Requested Karma for: ws-tuscany ICLA is on file Result email and vote thread: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-tuscany-dev/200707.mbox/[EMAIL PR

Re: [VOTE] Approve Tuscany Java SCA 0.91-incubating Release

2007-07-20 Thread ant elder
Looks ok to me now so +1. ...ant On 7/18/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Robert, Thanks for taking a look and posting your observations. - The javadocs are not supposed to be there in the maven repo. They seemed to have crept in by mistake. I have now deleted them. -

Re: [VOTE] Graduate ServiceMix to a Top Level Project (2nd thread)

2007-07-20 Thread ant elder
+1 ...ant On 7/20/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Any other IPMC member wants to vote? On 7/13/07, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The ServiceMix podling respectfully requests the Incubator to consider > its graduation to a Top Level Project. Please vote on recom

Re: [VOTE] Publish the Woden M7b release

2007-07-31 Thread ant elder
+1 from me. Some of the same comments on the previous M7a release still apply, eg, its preferred to have a separate DISCLAIMER file, having all licenses in a single LICENSE file, and have src and binary distro's unpack into different folders. ...ant On 7/30/07, Graham Turrell (gmail) <[EMAIL

Re: All licenses in a single file [WAS: Re: [VOTE] Publish the Woden M7b release]

2007-07-31 Thread ant elder
On 7/31/07, Matthieu Riou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 7/31/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > +1 from me. > > > > Some of the same comments on the previous M7a release still apply, eg, > > its > > preferred to have a separat

[jira] [Commented] (PODLINGNAMESEARCH-33) Establish whether "Apache JSPWiki" is a suitable name

2013-06-03 Thread ant elder (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-33?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13672933#comment-13672933 ] ant elder commented on PODLINGNAMESEARCH-33: The Incubator pod

<    1   2   3   4   5   6