Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Allura from the Incubator

ooks like all of the other SourceForge projects like >> the Open@Adobe sites I have visited. I would think that: >> >> >> 1) Apache wouldn't want to have SourceForge branding on Apache >> infrastructure >> 2) SourceForge wouldn't want Apache to have Source

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Allura from the Incubator

er ASF theme started.) That looks much better, thanks. > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 1:06 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On 17 March 2014 16:53, Cory Johns wrote: >> > Alex, >> > >> > The project is Allura, which does power the developer tools at >> SourceForge

Marking retired podlings in SVN

Just wondering whether it might be useful to add a RETIRED marker file to the top-level SVN directory of podlings that have retired? It could just be an empty file, or it could contain a link to the retired summary status, for example: http://incubator.apache.org/projects/index.html#agila I'm ha

Re: Process question on release votes

On 19 March 2014 15:05, Mark Struberg wrote: > what has been with the rule that an ipmc must forward the VOTE to the > incubator pmc when it gets started, and those members can also cast a binding > -1 ? IPMC votes are the only ones that are binding. However, even a binding -1 vote is not a vet

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Phoenix 2.2.3-incubating released

On 20 March 2014 01:12, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > > I may just be missing something but I don't see any MD5 or signed files in > the release area from the mirror the download page took me to. [1] they do > seem to be in RC4 [2] so it may be they just not been copied over or perhaps > all the

Re: Marking retired podlings in SVN

On 21 March 2014 00:03, David Crossley wrote: > On Tue, 18 Mar 2014, at 07:09 AM, sebb wrote: >> >> Just wondering whether it might be useful to add a RETIRED marker file >> to the top-level SVN directory of podlings that have retired? > > Good idea. > > Ad

Textual versions of podlings.xml

I wanted an easy way to get a summary list of podlings with their status, so I created another stylesheet [1] to process podlings.xml and generate 4 CSV files, and added a new target to the build script. The command "ant generate-summary" will generate the following files in target/ current.txt g

Rearrange the "Project List" into multiple pages?

The Project List [1] currently shows full details for all podlings past and present in a single rather long page. It might be better to have individual pages for the current/graduated/retired podlings, with a much simpler one-line summary of all the podlings on the existing page. The summary could

Callback SVN tree - is it still needed?

There is still a large SVN tree under https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/callback/ Callback was originally PhoneGap and is now Cordova Anyone know whether this SVN tree should be kept - in which case maybe it should be renamed to cordova - or deleted? ---

Flagging up retired podlings on the website

At present, often the only indication that podling is retired is that podlings.xml has been updated. Some podlings may include a note on their status page (Alois), others (Awf) don't. Neither Alois nor Awf have any indication on their web-pages that the podling has been retired. As well as upda

Re: Flagging up retired podlings on the website

On 24 March 2014 21:09, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:17 AM, sebb wrote: >> At present, often the only indication that podling is retired is that >> podlings.xml has been updated. >> >> Some podlings may include a note on their status page (Al

Re: Rearrange the "Project List" into multiple pages?

On 24 March 2014 20:56, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 9:17 AM, sebb wrote: >> The Project List [1] currently shows full details for all podlings >> past and present in a single rather long page. >> >> It might be better to have individual pages f

Re: Rearrange the "Project List" into multiple pages?

On 25 March 2014 01:18, David Crossley wrote: > On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, at 12:06 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 24 March 2014 20:56, Marvin Humphrey wrote: >> > On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 9:17 AM, sebb wrote: >> >> The Project List [1] currently shows full details for all podlin

Re: Rearrange the "Project List" into multiple pages?

On 25 March 2014 01:46, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > sebb: > >> Not always, for example >> >> OpenOffice.org => ooo >> >> The usecase for the resourcename (perhaps resourceAlias) is to access SVN > > Repositories are linked from the podling status page, t

Re: Rearrange the "Project List" into multiple pages?

On 25 March 2014 06:14, David Crossley wrote: > On Tue, 25 Mar 2014, at 01:14 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 25 March 2014 01:46, Marvin Humphrey wrote: >> > sebb: >> > >> >> Not always, for example >> >> >> >> OpenOffice.org => ooo >&

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

On 25 March 2014 18:11, John D. Ament wrote: > Can you update your notice file? [1] Please don't; that does not look like a correct NOTICE file. See http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#simple (et seq.) > - John > > [1]: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-phoenix.

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

On 25 March 2014 16:39, James Taylor wrote: > Hi everyone, > This is a call for a vote on Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1. Phoenix > is a SQL query engine for Apache HBase, a NoSQL data store. It is accessed > as a JDBC driver and enables querying and managing HBase tables using SQL. > This >

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

che.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-phoenix.git;a=commit;h=025a07c64d8f4a68d1c13b3022fe7375bbacfbb4 > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 2:31 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On 25 March 2014 18:11, John D. Ament wrote: >> > Can you update your notice file? [1] >> >> Please don't; that does not look like a c

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

On 25 March 2014 21:56, Andrew Purtell wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:54 AM, sebb wrote: > >> On 25 March 2014 16:39, James Taylor wrote: >> [...] >> >> > The source tarball, including signatures, digests, etc can be found at: >> > >>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

o the source code control system. > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 2:59 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On 25 March 2014 21:56, Andrew Purtell wrote: >> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:54 AM, sebb wrote: >> > >> >> On 25 March 2014 16:39, James Taylor wrote: >> >>

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 4.0.0 incubating RC1

The 4.0.0 release has the same problems as the 3.0.0 release. Spurious files in source bundle Incorrect NOTICE file in binary bundle Source bundle does not agree with Git tag even after allowing for the spurious RAT files - some other files have differences from the tag. There are also some files

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

On 25 March 2014 22:27, James Taylor wrote: > Thanks for the detailed review, Sebb. We really appreciate you spending > your time going through this. Here's the list of TODOs for us: > 1) In the binary bundle: > a) Fix the copy/paste error for the URL to SQLLine in the NOT

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

ow the guidelines listed here[1]. As am I ... > Thanks, > James > > [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html > > > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 3:48 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On 25 March 2014 22:27, James Taylor wrote: >> > Thanks for the detailed revi

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

On 25 March 2014 23:48, James Taylor wrote: > Ah, I see. Thanks, Sebb. So we should modify our LICENSE file as indicated > in http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps instead > of listing these in our LICENSE file. Since all licenses are either Apache > or BSD,

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

On 26 March 2014 00:23, James Taylor wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:07 PM, sebb wrote: >> >> >> HBase is ASF code surely? >> So why does it need mentioning? - unless its NOTICE file has some >> attributions that relate to what you are bundling >> >

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

On 26 March 2014 00:39, James Taylor wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:28 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On 26 March 2014 00:23, James Taylor wrote: >> > I think I was confused by the >> > http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#deps-of-depsinstructions. >> &g

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

On 26 March 2014 22:45, James Taylor wrote: > Marvin - > The one example in that email thread (airavata), has a bunch of copyright > notices in there NOTICE file: > https://github.com/apache/airavata/blob/master/modules/distribution/airavata-server/src/main/resources/NOTICE > > Is that correct or

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Phoenix 3.0.0 incubating RC1

On 26 March 2014 19:59, James Taylor wrote: > Below is our updated NOTICE (which includes the copyright for the bundled > bits) and LICENSE (minus the standard Apache 2.0 part). > > Would appreciate a review. > > Thanks, > James > > * NOTICE ** > > A

Re: [DISCUSS] Where does copyright information go for a binary distribution?

On 26 March 2014 23:55, James Taylor wrote: > Hello, > I'm getting a release ready for Apache Phoenix (incubating) and have a > question about where copyright information should go for our binary > distribution. It seems that there's quite a bit of variation, as all > projects are different. So I'

Re: [DISCUSS] Where does copyright information go for a binary distribution?

On 27 March 2014 00:52, James Taylor wrote: > Where does the copyright information go in our case? What copyright information? Where was it originally? > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:48 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On 26 March 2014 23:55, James Taylor wrote: >> > Hello,

Re: [VOTE] Release Sentry 1.3.0 incubating rc0

On 29 March 2014 04:08, Sravya Tirukkovalur wrote: > I cherry-picked the above commit (Sentry-119) into the 1.3.0 local release > branch. > > Now the size of the artifact is 335K and it also has the required files > like DISCLAMIER. I can go ahead and push the change if thats ok. Please ensure th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.4.0-incubating RC0

On 30 March 2014 09:03, Siddharth Seth wrote: > I have created a tez-0.4.0-incubating release candidate (rc0). > > GIT source tag: > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-tez/repo?p=incubator-tez.git;a=log;h=refs/tags/release-0.4.0-incubating-rc0(commit > hash fe031a7a00055673d8b0aa109

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.4.0-incubating RC0

On 30 March 2014 12:46, sebb wrote: > On 30 March 2014 09:03, Siddharth Seth wrote: >> I have created a tez-0.4.0-incubating release candidate (rc0). >> >> GIT source tag: >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-tez/repo?p=incubator-tez.git;a=log;h=refs/ta

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.4.0-incubating RC0

On 31 March 2014 02:51, Siddharth Seth wrote: > Sebb, Thanks for taking a look at the release. > > Will use a newline for the git/svn revision next time around. > > Generated the hashes using "openssl dgst -sha512 ". I'll change > the format on the next re

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tez-0.4.0-incubating RC0

On 31 March 2014 20:55, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 8:31 AM, sebb wrote: > >>> The jar files are also distributions and must therefore have embedded >>>> NOTICE and LICENSE files, e.g. in the META-INF directory. >>> >>> Does thi

Re: Apache Flex FlexUnit LICENSE and NOTICE files

On 2 April 2014 02:44, Justin Mclean wrote: > HI, > > While Apache Flex is not an incubating project I think this discussion may be > useful for incubating projects in a similar situation. > > We just getting together the first release of Apache Flex FlexUnit4. In > Apache Flex FlexUnit 4 source

Re: Apache Flex FlexUnit LICENSE and NOTICE files

On 2 April 2014 12:03, Justin Mclean wrote: > Hi, > >> What do you mean by correct? > The have the correct copyright and licence header. ie the Adobe files have a > BSD license and are copyright Adobe. > >> The LICENSE file must include the text - or provide a pointer to a >> local copy of the te

Graduation resolution does not allow for committers != PMC

There have been a couple of graduations recently where (I think) the podling expected to be able to specify the initial list of committers as different from the PMC. In at least one case the podling did not realise that the names on the board resolution comprise the initial PMC. I think there are

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Twill-0.2.0-incubating [rc1]

On 3 April 2014 06:04, Terence Yim wrote: > Hi all, > > This is to call for a vote for releasing twill-0.2.0-incubating. This > is the second release for Twill. > > Vote on twill-dev: > http://s.apache.org/ZJP > > Result on vote on twill-dev: > http://s.apache.org/ksD > > The source tarball, inclu

Retired podlings - should SVN trees be moved under a RETIRED subtree?

I made a start adding RETIRED markers to retired podlings, but stalled because updates are needed to the svn mailer configuration and then authorization. However it now occurs to me that it might be easier to navigate the incubator svn tree if the retired podling svn trees were moved under incubat

Re: Retired podlings - should SVN trees be moved under a RETIRED subtree?

On 7 April 2014 15:43, Craig L Russell wrote: > > On Apr 7, 2014, at 2:39 AM, sebb wrote: > >> I made a start adding RETIRED markers to retired podlings, but stalled >> because updates are needed to the svn mailer configuration and then >> authorization. >> >&

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Stratos as a TLP

This reminds me: I assume the podling is aware that the names listed in the proposed board resolution will become the initial PMC? i.e. everyone listed in the resolution will become a PMC member (and committer). There was at least one recent graduation where this was not understood. They expected

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Stratos as a TLP

On 1 May 2014 15:16, Suresh Marru wrote: > Since there were no issues raised on the DISCUSS thread, I will start the > graduation vote now. There was 1 issue: Mohammad Noureldin does not want to be part of the initial PMC Also I asked if the podling is aware that the initial PMC is as per the

Re: Incubator wiki access

Done On 11 May 2014 07:03, Gary Helmling wrote: > Hi all, > > I need write access to the incubator wiki to post the Twill report for the > board. > > My username is "GaryHelmling". > > My apologies if this message shows up twice. I originally sent a request > during the mail outage, but haven't

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Falcon version 0.5-incubating

On 19 May 2014 22:09, Seetharam Venkatesh wrote: > Hello folks, > > This is a call for a vote on Apache Falcon 0.5 incubating release. > > A vote was held on developer mailing list and it passed with 8 +1's. > > Vote thread: http://s.apache.org/xtf > Results thread: Apache mail is slow and do not

Re: [PROPOSAL] fleece as an incubator project

On 3 June 2014 22:19, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hmm > > think users@ can be used quickly. Is it really an issue? > Incubation should be used to build up the developer community. Adding a user list may lead to fragmentation. > > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmannibu

Re: [DISCUSS] Graduate Apache Celix as TLP

On 16 June 2014 08:56, Alexander Broekhuis wrote: > 2014-06-16 0:36 GMT+02:00 Joe Brockmeier : > >> On 06/13/2014 05:17 PM, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: >> > Personally, I don't feel this is a big deal. The PMC size is appropriate >> > given the overall project size. That said, I'd like to make two poi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Samza 0.7.0-incubating RC0

On 29 June 2014 01:02, Jakob Homan wrote: > This is vote for Samza's 0.7.0 release. The PPMC vote passed 6x+1 6 > (Martin, Jakob, Yan, Sriram, Zhijie, Garry): > http://bit.ly/samza070releasevote > > The release candidate can be downloaded from here: > http://people.apache.org/~martinkl/samza-0.7.

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Tez from Apache Incubator to TLP

On 1 July 2014 05:16, Hitesh Shah wrote: > Hello folks > > Tez entered incubation in February, 2013. Since then, we have made progress > towards graduation[1]. The Tez community recently voted positively towards > graduation[2] with 27 +1s. > Of the 27, there were 5 IPMC votes from our mentors:

Re: Reviewing license / notice and bundled software

On 17 July 2014 15:20, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > I guess it is about mvn dependency:tree analysis. No, that just shows the run-time dependencies. What's important is what is actually included (bundled) in the release archives (source and binary). The NOTICE and LICENSE files must ONLY relate

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.4.0-incubating release

On 8 August 2014 18:12, Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Hi Ted, > > On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: >> Also, I think that it is important that *all* dependency licenses be >> documented in the source release. Speaking as a consumer, I need to know >> what dependencies will come in wh

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Nuvem as a sub-project under Apache Tuscany

Anyone know what happened to Nuvem? According to Incubator records, it graduated in Nov 2012. However, I can find no trace of it under Tuscany, and it did not become a TLP. Perhaps it should be revoted as retired instead? On 30 November 2012 02:01, Luciano Resende wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012

Re: svn commit: r1617185 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/vxquery.xml

On 11 August 2014 01:42, wrote: > Author: tillw > Date: Mon Aug 11 00:42:15 2014 > New Revision: 1617185 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1617185 > Log: > fix VXQuery incubation status page > > Modified: > incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/vxquery.xml > > Modified: incubator/public/trunk

Re: svn commit: r1617185 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/vxquery.xml

On 11 August 2014 15:26, Till Westmann wrote: > > > On 11 Aug 2014, at 5:31, sebb wrote: > >> On 11 August 2014 01:42, wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Description >>> @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ >>> >>> News >&

Re: [VOTE] Release RC4 as Apache Usergrid 1.0 (incubating) - CORRECTION

On 3 September 2014 06:21, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 03.09.2014 05:03, Jake Farrell wrote: >> Hi John >> I requested that Dave add the RC tag to better keep track of multiple >> release candidates and make it easier for testing and not mixing any >> previous version up accidentally. This is very co

Re: [VOTE] Release RC4 as Apache Usergrid 1.0 (incubating) - CORRECTION

On 3 September 2014 16:26, Dave wrote: > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 8:14 AM, John D. Ament > wrote: >> >> So - just to confirm. If I look at >> apache-usergrid-incubating-1.0.0-rc5-source.tar.gz the contents in the >> pom.xml files will read the version "1.0.0-rc5" and the git tag will also >> read

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

On 7 September 2014 20:31, Jacques Nadeau wrote: > As I understand the release guidelines, one is not allowed to put something > on dist.apache.org until after a release vote by the Incubator PMC approves > that release: > > "Only formally-approved releases may be distributed from the main > direc

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.5.0-incubating release

t; >> > Ted, >> > >> > Do you mean more than here: >> > >> > [1]: http://www.apache.org/dev/publishing-maven-artifacts.html >> > [2]: http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#host-rc >> > >> > On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Ted

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Usergrid 1.0 (incubating)

On 9 September 2014 23:47, Dave wrote: > Just a reminder... we have one more day for voting on Usergrid 1.0. The 72 hours is a minimum, not a maximum. A vote does not automatically fail it it takes longer than 72 hours. The vote can take as lng as it needs, though generally the Release Manage

Re: New Committers not showing up on people.a.o

On 11 September 2014 23:41, Andrew Phillips wrote: > > > From what I recall, the information in people.as..o is generated from FOAF > files, which are committed to a repo. See [1] for details. Some of people.a.o is derived from FOAF file. But the "committers by ..." pages are currently obtained

Re: New Committers not showing up on people.a.o

On 11 September 2014 23:06, Ted Dunning wrote: > Last time I had to figure this out, this link was the key: > > http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#SVNaccess > LDAP is not used for Incubator podling members. Podling groups are defined in the asf-authorization file. I just checked http://people.

Re: New Committers not showing up on people.a.o

On 12 September 2014 00:12, sebb wrote: > On 11 September 2014 23:06, Ted Dunning wrote: >> Last time I had to figure this out, this link was the key: >> >> http://www.apache.org/dev/pmc.html#SVNaccess >> > > LDAP is not used for Incubator podling members. T

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Falcon 0.5-incubating - RC5

On 14 September 2014 08:41, Srikanth Sundarrajan wrote: > Hello, > We have reworked the release for Falcon 0.5 post feedback on LICENSE and > NOTICE from IPMC. Special thanks to Sebb, Justin Mclean and Chris Douglas for > helping us with this. > > A vote was held among

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Falcon 0.5-incubating - RC5

On 14 September 2014 12:57, jan i wrote: > On 14 September 2014 13:39, sebb wrote: > >> On 14 September 2014 08:41, Srikanth Sundarrajan >> wrote: >> > Hello, >> > We have reworked the release for Falcon 0.5 post feedback on LICENSE >> and NOTICE

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Falcon 0.5-incubating - RC5

3683c71875f2a020519eb587 >> >> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-falcon.git;a=commit;h=5a9b96a74014718a3683c71875f2a020519eb587 >> >> @Sebb, Thanks for pointing out the gap relating to vote expiry. What is >> the recommendation on this

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Falcon 0.5-incubating - RC5

On 14 September 2014 08:41, Srikanth Sundarrajan wrote: > Hello, > We have reworked the release for Falcon 0.5 post feedback on LICENSE and > NOTICE from IPMC. Special thanks to Sebb, Justin Mclean and Chris Douglas for > helping us with this. > > A vote was held among

Re: [PROPOSAL] Silk as new Incubator project

The user mailing list is not normally used for podlings. Only the developer and private lists are needed. On 19 September 2014 05:40, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > I would like to propose Silk as an Apache Incubator project. The new > proposal is added to https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SilkPropo

Re: svn commit: r1626885 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml

On 22 September 2014 21:03, wrote: > Author: ptgoetz > Date: Mon Sep 22 20:03:55 2014 > New Revision: 1626885 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1626885 > Log: > set storm status to graduated > > Modified: > incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml > > Modified: incubator/public/trunk/content

Re: svn commit: r1626888 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml

On 22 September 2014 21:13, wrote: > Author: ptgoetz > Date: Mon Sep 22 20:13:24 2014 > New Revision: 1626888 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1626888 > Log: > set storm status to graduating > > Modified: > incubator/public/trunk/content/podlings.xml > > Modified: incubator/public/trunk/conten

Re: [VOTE] Apache DeviceMap Data 1.0.1 incubating

On 23 September 2014 17:11, Reza wrote: > This is the second device data release for DeviceMap. This release contains > various new devices and generic device class additions: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DMAP/fixforversion/12327454/ > > The project vote is here: http://markmail.org/m

Re: [Proposal] Taverna workflow

On 23 September 2014 13:43, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > I hereby present the Apache Incubator proposal for the project Taverna. > > > Also available in rich text in the Taverna wiki (with more hyperlinks!): > > http://dev.mygrid.org.uk/wiki/display/developer/Taverna+incubator+proposal > > (Could

Re: Code Donations and Committer Righs

On 26 September 2014 19:03, jan i wrote: > On 26 September 2014 19:23, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > >> Just like Ross, the following constitutes my personal opinion >> (that has been formed over the years of maintaining complex >> code bases written "before my time"): >> >> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 1

Re: [VOTE] Apache Johnzon 0.1-incubating release

On 28 September 2014 22:31, Hendrik Dev wrote: > So the project passed with 6 +1 votes (at least 3 of them binding from > Romain Manni-Bucau, Justin Mclean and Daniel Kulp) and no -1 votes. > See http://markmail.org/thread/2tnh43qokzj3hiwa and > http://markmail.org/thread/g5etfukwi4av6kuk > > As o

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating)

On 9 October 2014 20:51, Julian Hyde wrote: > Hi all, > > The Calcite community has voted on and approved a proposal to release > Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating). > > This will be the second release since the project entered incubation in > May 2014 as Optiq, and the first under the new project

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating)

w.apache.org/dist/incubator/calcite/ Note: I also created https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/calcite which can be used for future release candidates. > Julian > > > > On Oct 9, 2014, at 1:00 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On 9 October 2014 20:51, Julian Hyde wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating)

On 10 October 2014 00:54, Julian Hyde wrote: > > On Oct 9, 2014, at 4:41 PM, sebb wrote: > >> On 9 October 2014 21:14, Julian Hyde wrote: >>> That information is all in the vote proposal: >>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating)

On 10 October 2014 18:59, Julian Hyde wrote: > OK, let me clarify as sebb has asked so that the vote can proceed. Thanks very much, the new text is very good. > The git commit to be voted upon: > http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-opt

Re: Bloated NOTICE files are evil

On 11 October 2014 19:30, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Sean Owen wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: >>> Netty's artifacts ("its distribution") do not include a notice. Thus, >> >> They most certainly do. Please download the distribution

Re: svn commit: r1631099 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/ignite.xml

On 11 October 2014 20:15, wrote: > Author: cos > Date: Sat Oct 11 19:15:17 2014 > New Revision: 1631099 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1631099 > Log: > Updating Ignite website with initial INFRA task dates > > Modified: > incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/ignite.xml > > Modified: incub

Re: svn commit: r1631099 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/projects/ignite.xml

On 13 October 2014 03:28, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 12.10.2014 14:24, sebb wrote: >> On 11 October 2014 20:15, wrote: >>> Author: cos >>> Date: Sat Oct 11 19:15:17 2014 >>> New Revision: 1631099 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1631099 &

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release

On 13 October 2014 10:06, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Justin Mclean > wrote: >> ...However votes on releases are more about the source release and >> binaries releases are just a convenience so I don't see that as a blocker... > > To clarify, the ASF only releas

Re: Bloated NOTICE files are evil

On 12 October 2014 17:40, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 5:16 AM, sebb wrote: >> I don't think that's correct. > > Well, since neither of us is a lawyer (at least I am not) at this > point we're debating interpretations on ALv2. > >>

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release

On 13 October 2014 17:15, Branko Čibej wrote: > On 13.10.2014 16:14, Julian Hyde wrote: >> For many projects, especially "library" projects, the "convenient binaries" >> that matter most these days are the jars (source, binary, and javadoc) that >> are deployed to the maven repo. Calcite release

Re: [VOTE] Apache Drill 0.6.0-incubating release

On 13 October 2014 15:30, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Julian Hyde wrote: >> >> For many projects, especially "library" projects, the "convenient binaries" >> that matter most these >> days are the jars (source, binary, and javadoc) that are deployed to the >> m

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating)

On 14 October 2014 04:40, Ted Dunning wrote: > My search was on the key servers, by using pgp.mit.edu. The issue was that > you, ironically, can't seem to search by key id. You need to prefix the (hex) id with 0x, for example: http://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=0x2AD3FAE3&op=index&fingerprint

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Calcite 0.9.1 (incubating)

On 13 October 2014 17:11, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > I suggest that the release manager and anyone else in the KEYS file should > have added key fingerprints to their Apache profiles at > . > > This will have their PGP keys refreshed regularly under their Apache ID at > <

Re: [VOTE] Accept Taverna into the Apache Incubator

Apart from the typo, I thought it was necessary for the VOTE thread to contain the full text of the proposal. This has been the case for (almost) all previous acceptance votes. I assume the text is required so the mail archives have a full record of what was actually voted on. The Wiki page migh

Re: [VOTE] Accept Lens into the Apache Incubator (earlier called Grill)

It looks like the version [1] of the Wiki page that was active at the time of the vote was: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/LensProposal?rev=4 [1] https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/LensProposal?action=info For the record, the current contents of that version are appended below: --

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2

On 18 August 2012 13:24, Andre Fischer wrote: > Hi all, > > this is a call for vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache > OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating). This will be the second incubator release for > Apache OpenOffice after the 3.4 release with already more than 11 million > downloads.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 3.4.1 (incubating) RC2

On 21 August 2012 14:38, Benson Margulies wrote: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Rob Weir wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Thilo Goetz wrote: >>> On 21/08/12 13:59, Branko Čibej wrote: >>>> On 21.08.2012 12:52, sebb wrote: >>>>> I th

Re: [VOTE] Apache Crunch (incubating) 0.3.0 Release Candidate 1

On 11 September 2012 16:55, Josh Wills wrote: > Hey everyone, > > A slight correction below-- Matthias is not on the Crunch PPMC, and so his > +1 vote should have been marked as non-binding. Apologies. AIUI only Incubator PMC (IPMC) member votes are binding for release votes. IMO it's a bit conf

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Bigtop podling from Apache Incubator

On 12 September 2012 17:08, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: > This is a call for vote to graduate Bigtop podling from Apache Incubator > > The Apache Bigtop project entered incubator in June of 2011. Since then we > have grown the community in users and contributors, and we've made > significant improveme

Re: Openmeetings - A Shepherd's View

On 14 September 2012 13:57, Alexei Fedotov wrote: > The most useful file containing the project classpath is only formatted > automatically, it cannot be generated without project-specific knowledge. > > There is no techical problem to drop these files, yet developers who > download our source rel

Re: Openmeetings - A Shepherd's View

On 14 September 2012 17:53, Benson Margulies wrote: > Does anyone seriously believe that IP notices are required in files like > these? > > These files cannot be copyrighted because they do not have any > 'creative' content. If they can't be copyrighted, they can't be > licensed. And, even it wer

Re: svn commit: r1386462 - /incubator/public/trunk/content/history/current.txt

On 17 September 2012 23:36, David Crossley wrote: > Jukka Zitting wrote: >> crossley wrote: >> > Modified: >> > incubator/public/trunk/content/history/current.txt >> >> Thanks for keeping that file up to date! The graph at >> http://incubator.apache.org/history/ is quite useful. >> >> However,

Re: automating history charts and Clutch

On 18 September 2012 03:32, David Crossley wrote: > sebb wrote: >> David Crossley wrote: >> > Jukka Zitting wrote: >> >> crossley wrote: >> >> > r1386462 >> >> > Modified: >> >> > incubator/public/trunk/content/history

Re: automating history charts and Clutch

On 18 September 2012 12:07, sebb wrote: > On 18 September 2012 03:32, David Crossley wrote: >> sebb wrote: >>> David Crossley wrote: >>> > Jukka Zitting wrote: >>> >> crossley wrote: >>> >> > r1386462 >>> >&g

Re: New challenges (Was: NOMINATIONS for Incubator PMC Chair)

On 2 October 2012 00:00, Benson Margulies wrote: > On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote: >> Jukka Zitting wrote on Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 00:06:38 +0200: >>> PPS. It would be nice if we could use Apache Steve for the election. >>> Volunteers? > > > Seems a bit premature. Let's see i

Re: New challenges (Was: NOMINATIONS for Incubator PMC Chair)

e it did earlier this year), there's of course no need > for a more complicated voting process. > > On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 10:49 AM, sebb wrote: >> Also is there any reason to vote in secret? >> AFAIK all other PMC chair votes are just held on the private list. >> >

Re: Permission to publish Allura website?

On 10 October 2012 16:54, Rich Bowen wrote: > The Incubator docs state: > > The website is published by checking out the content from SVN into the > directory/www/incubator.apache.org/content/podlingname on people.apache.org. > > When I try to do this, I get > >> svn checkout https://svn.apache.o

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >