Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> the new version of portage has customizable compression ... this is
> cool as now people can do bzip/gzip/whatever
Auto compressing is nice, but I have a question for info files. The
/usr/share/info//dir file must not be compressed but is with
newer version
On 2007-01-30, Matthias Langer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> nope ... let's hope c++-0x comes out soon and that compiler vendors are
> faster in implementing it than c++-98.
It's actually officially called (skipping all the admin stuff): C++09
That gives a good indication of when it is likely to
Hi,
Unfortunately, most of the active KDE herd/group members are a bit unactive
right
now (self included), which means that bugs are really starting to pile up. If
you
have any interest in this at all, please by all means join the herd and start
helping us out.
Thanks!
Caleb
--
gentoo-dev@g
DITTO, I'm currently only available on weekends, so guys, come kill
some bugs for us ;-)
On 1/31/07, Caleb Tennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Unfortunately, most of the active KDE herd/group members are a bit unactive
right
now (self included), which means that bugs are really starting to pile u
Hi,
I'm not a Gentoo dev at all, but I'll try to kill as much KDE bugs as possible.
.. currently working on bug#163051
Regards,
Elias P.
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 14:43:57 +0100
Von: "Ioannis Aslanidis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
An: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
Betre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Apparently people are starting to drop arch keywords again without
notifying arch teams in any way, shape or form. As the developer handbook
indicates, it is greatly appreciated and makes for much smoother workings
with the arch teams if you'd at
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 30 January 2007 16:10, Jim Ramsay wrote:
> > In other words, I propose that this function should probably do
> > 'basename' on $exec before using it for the .desktop filename.
>
> no ... the point of using $exec is to make sure the .desktop file is unique
>
> i'
Hi folks.
I'm new here, so thought I'd say hello.
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 13:07, Caleb Tennis wrote:
> Unfortunately, most of the active KDE herd/group members are a bit unactive
> right now (self included), which means that bugs are really starting to
> pile up. If you have any interest in
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 11:11:20 -0500 (EST) "Caleb Tennis"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > * Hard dep upon boost. This sucks for g++-4.1 users.
| >
| > * Hard dep upon g++-4.1, which isn't available for all archs. This
| > doesn't even work because there's no guarantee that >=4.1 is being
| > used even
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 10:47:09 -0600 Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| > * Hard dep upon g++-4.1, which isn't available for all archs. This
| > doesn't even work because there's no guarantee that >=4.1 is being
| > used even if it's installed.
|
| I haven't done my homework, so I'll just a
We'd be rather more interested if you overlook a little that part and
help us fix a few bugs ;)
Peter Lewis wrote:
Hi folks.
I'm new here, so thought I'd say hello.
On Wednesday 31 January 2007 13:07, Caleb Tennis wrote:
Unfortunately, most of the active KDE herd/group members are a bit unac
Ciaran McCreesh a écrit :
* Hard dep upon boost. This sucks for g++-4.1 users.
* Hard dep upon g++-4.1, which isn't available for all archs. This
doesn't even work because there's no guarantee that >=4.1 is being used
even if it's installed.
* || ( ) deps, and hope that if the user has 4.1 inst
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 06:27:49 +
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ Background: tr1 is a set of extensions to the C++ Standard Library
> giving various useful things like hash tables and smart pointers.
> There are partial implementations included in g++-4.1 and boost and
> full impl
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:36:33 +0100
Rémi Cardona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Newbie idea : g++ and boost both provide virtual/tr1
>
> Newbie question : besides the fact that you would have to rebuild
> packages if you changed the virtual, is there anything painfully
> obvious why that would be a
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:24:31 + Stephen Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| And what exactly is required of a package providing virtual/tr1? If it
| has to implement the entirity of the TR, then g++-4.1 can't provide
| the virtual and the purpose is lost since the most used parts of the
| exten
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 11:24:31PM +, Stephen Bennett wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:36:33 +0100
> Rémi Cardona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Newbie idea : g++ and boost both provide virtual/tr1
> >
> > Newbie question : besides the fact that you would have to rebuild
> > packages if you
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:32:03 -0800 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| You're ignoring that new style virtuals can have versions; thus
| virtual/tr-[arbitrary version <1]
| can be 'almost full 1 support'.
Which means what, in terms of parts of tr1 that are and aren't supplied
by various peo
On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 11:38:04PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:32:03 -0800 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | You're ignoring that new style virtuals can have versions; thus
> | virtual/tr-[arbitrary version <1]
> | can be 'almost full 1 support'.
>
> Which m
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:00:49 -0800 Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 11:38:04PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| > On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:32:03 -0800 Brian Harring
| > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > | You're ignoring that new style virtuals can have versions; thus
|
media-video/dxr2-driver has been removed from the tree
See http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=153365
Steve
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wednesday 31 January 2007, Jim Ramsay wrote:
> Personally I'd rather just add one line to my ebuild as opposed to
> creating and maintaining a .desktop file in the files directory. This
> would just add a useful feature for those who want that level of
> flexibility.
which is rarely needed/wan
On Wednesday 31 January 2007, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> The /usr/share/info//dir file must not be compressed but is with
> newer versions.
probably ... i think info is garbage so ive never bothered validating it
-mike
pgpDns0u5VJ8N.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> the new version of portage has customizable compression ... this is
>> cool as now people can do bzip/gzip/whatever
>
> Auto compressing is nice, but I have a question for info f
On Thursday 01 February 2007, Zac Medico wrote:
> Portage does create the dir files for each of the directories listed
> in the INFOPATH and INFODIR environment variables.
it should be removing the dir files in install_qa_check()
from /usr/share/info/
-mike
pgpWQ95qQaZY2.pgp
Description: PGP si
Fellow devs,
Many packages have far more options than are presented to gentoo users though
an ebuild interface. By embracing the principles of choice[1] the gentoo
developers have an obligation to provide a far range of choice on their
installation. This is particularly important in:
- embedded
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 23:30:53 -0500, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> about the only thing that'd work is an additional parameter called
> "cruft" that'd be passed unfiltered into the .desktop file
You can also imagine a "-v" switch, which would make this function print
the full path (w
On Thursday 01 February 2007, Daniel Black wrote:
> IMPLEMENTION
thanks for putting this together
> store_config should only be called from pkg_preinst or src_install
this is easy to check in the eclass via $EBUILD_PHASE
> Also creates the following symlinks to it
i dont see much value in thes
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 06:21:01PM +1100, Daniel Black wrote:
> Fellow devs,
> WARN_CONFIG
>
> warn_config (useflags)
>
> warns the user that the useflags have been overridden by savedconfig
>
> Anything else?
overriding use flags by a secondary configuration is a mess waiting to
happen... nee
28 matches
Mail list logo
