On 29/10/14 13:42, Alex Xu wrote:
On 29/10/14 07:28 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
request for review before committing, suggestions welcome since it's
rather short what
i got to say
thanks,
Samuli
typical news items are in the format packages no longer/now do
thing. [thing is description
On 07/11/14 14:21, Alex Xu wrote:
On 07/11/14 07:13 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 29/10/14 13:42, Alex Xu wrote:
On 29/10/14 07:28 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
request for review before committing, suggestions welcome since it's
rather short what
i got to say
thanks,
Samuli
typical news
request for review before committing, suggestions welcome since it's
rather short what
i got to say
thanks,
Samuli
Title: Upgrade to udev = 217 or eudev = 2.1
Author: Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2014-10-29
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
Display
On 17/09/14 16:29, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 17/09/2014 14:49, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
On 2014-09-17 14:20, viv...@gmail.com wrote:
Il 17/09/2014 14:09, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto ha scritto:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2014, Luca Barbato wrote:
The bc utility is part of the posix tools and it might be
I could use some help with bugs at,
http://bugs.gentoo.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=479818hide_resolved=1
Specifically with x11-libs/fox bug
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=520674 because it's an library,
I'm almost ashamed my patch efforts to it have failed, I keep running
from one
On 08/09/14 06:47, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
On 09/07/2014 09:03 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
Right now the general policy is that we don't allow unmasked (hard or
via keywords) ebuilds in the tree if they use an scm to fetch their
sources. There are a bunch of reasons for this, and for the
Trying to raise awareness:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=be2ea723b1d023b3d385d3b791ee4607cbfb20ca
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/sys-fs/udev/udev-.ebuild?r1=1.317r2=1.318
On 01/09/14 03:37, Patrick Lauer wrote:
On Sunday 31 August 2014 17:13:49 Samuli Suominen wrote:
Trying to raise awareness:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=be2ea723b1d023b3d385d
3b791ee4607cbfb20ca
What are the effects for end-users?
Nothing if they follow
On 28/08/14 17:11, William Hubbs wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:43:19PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:37:48 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
What do you think?
Kill it! With fire! And blood!
Add me to the list requesting that we kill dohtml as well.
On 28/08/14 18:58, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-08-28, o godz. 00:37:48
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
3. ulm wants to reintroduce dohtml in an eclass for people who want to
use it. I'd rather cover it with warnings signs and tell people not to
touch it. IMHO a better
no bugs left open in http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479818, so
I've unmasked jpeg-9a
to ~arch
if you experience problems, take a look at patches applied to
x11-libs/fltk, net-libs/webkit-gtk, net-misc/nx
for examples howto solve porting issues
thanks,
samuli
On 21/08/14 14:31, Samuli Suominen wrote:
no bugs left open in http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479818, so
I've unmasked jpeg-9a
to ~arch
if you experience problems, take a look at patches applied to
x11-libs/fltk, net-libs/webkit-gtk, net-misc/nx
for examples howto solve porting
On 03/08/14 16:16, Mike Frysinger wrote:
upstream glibc has dropped support for older Linux kernels. your choices:
- upgrade your kernel
- switch to a different C library
- stick with glibc-2.19 for a while
be warned though there are no plans atm to backport things to glibc-2.19.
On 30/07/14 14:48, Luis Ressel wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 09:38:16 + (UTC)
Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
In the context of that policy and a content-touchless-bump goal, I
suppose I'd script the bump, pulling keywords from the highest
previous version, prepending the ~ as
On 30/07/14 14:18, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 3:38 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 7/30/14, 7:36 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
If it's 2-3 packages out of ~300, I'd rather pick them out than
revision bump all ~300 for the 2-3. Or not pick them out at all
On 30/07/14 20:29, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Am 2014-07-30 14:33, schrieb Samuli Suominen:
There is no need to package.mask if proper if -logic is used, like, for
example,
if [[ ${PV} == * ]]; then
inherit git-r3
KEYWORDS=
else
KEYWORDS=~amd64 ~arm ~arm64 ~x86
fi
Then you can
On 29/07/14 03:15, Denis Dupeyron wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:41 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org
wrote:
x265-1.2.ebuild:KEYWORDS=~amd64 ~arm ~x86
x265-1.3.ebuild:KEYWORDS=~amd64 ~x86
x265-.ebuild:KEYWORDS=~amd64 ~x86
As in... You forgot to add ~arm to -
On 30/07/14 07:45, Alexander Tsoy wrote:
В Sun, 27 Jul 2014 14:42:24 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org пишет:
On 26/07/14 15:49, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:41:16 + (UTC)
Martin Vaeth mar...@mvath.de wrote:
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dynamics deps
On 27/07/14 16:47, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-07-27, o godz. 14:42:24
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On 26/07/14 15:49, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:41:16 + (UTC)
Martin Vaeth mar...@mvath.de wrote:
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dynamics
On 27/07/14 14:33, Pacho Ramos wrote:
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (27 Jul 2014)
# Not buildable for a long time, bug #414903
# Removal in a month.
media-plugins/vdr-dxr3
media-video/dxr3config
media-video/em8300-libraries
You forgot to mask em8300-modules. That's the package that's
On 27/07/14 22:01, Markus Meier (maekke) wrote:
maekke 14/07/27 19:01:15
Modified: x265-1.0.ebuild ChangeLog x265-1.2.ebuild
x265-0.8.ebuild
Log:
add ~arm, bug #510340
Package bumping is done by, eg.:
# cp x265-.ebuild x265-1.3.ebuild
On 28/07/14 09:41, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 27/07/14 22:01, Markus Meier (maekke) wrote:
maekke 14/07/27 19:01:15
Modified: x265-1.0.ebuild ChangeLog x265-1.2.ebuild
x265-0.8.ebuild
Log:
add ~arm, bug #510340
Package bumping is done by, eg
On 28/07/14 09:38, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 27/07/14 14:33, Pacho Ramos wrote:
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (27 Jul 2014)
# Not buildable for a long time, bug #414903
# Removal in a month.
media-plugins/vdr-dxr3
media-video/dxr3config
media-video/em8300-libraries
You forgot to mask
On 26/07/14 15:49, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:41:16 + (UTC)
Martin Vaeth mar...@mvath.de wrote:
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dynamics deps are already broken, not consistently enabled (e.g.
when subslots are in use)
Just to make it clear: No, dynamic deps are
On 27/07/14 14:50, hasufell wrote:
Samuli Suominen:
On 26/07/14 15:49, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 12:41:16 + (UTC)
Martin Vaeth mar...@mvath.de wrote:
hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dynamics deps are already broken, not consistently enabled (e.g.
when subslots
On 26/07/14 13:22, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 07/26/14 04:44, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El sáb, 26-07-2014 a las 10:36 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió:
El vie, 25-07-2014 a las 15:07 -0500, William Hubbs escribió:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 03:57:20PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 07/25/14 15:50,
On 25/07/14 11:07, Daniel Campbell wrote:
On 07/24/2014 02:22 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
gentoo-x86 has been converted to use virtual/libgudev. big thanks to
_AxS_ who helped me to
get it finally done.
that means we will be removing compability USE flags gudev
introspection from virtual
gentoo-x86 has been converted to use virtual/libgudev. big thanks to
_AxS_ who helped me to
get it finally done.
that means we will be removing compability USE flags gudev
introspection from virtual/udev
tomorrow'ish (only waiting for gnome-overlay folks)
run this in your overlay:
$ grep
On 22/07/14 11:21, Michael Palimaka wrote:
On 07/22/2014 07:52 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
To sum up: My vote is disable dynamic-deps. And I would be happy to
apply a patch that does this with the information I have today.
What a great way to kill the distro.
I can already heat my house
On 22/07/14 20:11, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jul 2014 19:03:16 +0200
Sven Vermeulen sw...@gentoo.org wrote:
As someone who regularly adds in dependencies without bumping (adding
USE=selinux dependencies to the proper SELinux policy) because that
would trigger lots of totally
On 22/07/14 10:25, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
On 7/21/14, 11:52 PM, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
2. Remove dynamic-deps. This is what I think currently makes sense.
+1 I also think it's the best option.
Not before someone has implemented an alternative way to avoid useless
rebuilding.
The
On 21/07/14 12:30, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 02:35:45 -0500
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Diamond wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 00:25:02 +
Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote:
Removals:
net-misc/curl 2014-07-15 09:29:56
blueness
Is this a joke?
media-gfx/splashutils fails to build, and it fails everytime one of it's
reverse dependency changes dependencies because it fails to use
pkg-config to query Libs:
it's supposed to have proxy-maint, but nobody is pushing fixes for the
supposed proxy-maint
it's in no shape to be in tree as-is,
On 21/07/14 18:11, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 21/07/14 11:07 AM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
On Monday 21 July 2014 10:08:44 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Any -Werror=* flag will make random autoconf checks fail for no
good
reason, don't use them on profiles, it's silly.
Diego Elio
Besides, people should migrate to something with active upstream, like
plymouth
On 21/07/14 22:37, hasufell wrote:
afaiu dynamic deps are broken and not defined in PMS
still... people seem to fix deps without revbumping, causing users who
either don't use dynamic deps (it's optional for portage through
--dynamic-deps=y, although it's on by default) or who use a
On 21/07/14 22:50, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 22:42:23 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
people are revbumping packages for the simplest things like EAPI4-5
EAPI changing to 5 should always get a revbump, since it causes
confusion if anyone has a USE
On 21/07/14 23:13, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 21/07/14 04:06 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 21/07/14 22:50, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 22:42:23 +0300 Samuli Suominen
ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
people are revbumping packages for the simplest things like
EAPI4-5
EAPI
On 21/07/14 23:56, Michał Górny wrote:
Now... whether dynamic deps are technically the right thing to do is another
question. It merits discussion, but we need to be really sure about the
consequences of any change.
Yes, it does. I'm not sure if it leads anywhere, though. Dynamic deps
are
On 22/07/14 04:05, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
And just for fun, since no one has mentioned it yet, dynamic deps don't
work at all on binpkgs since the Packages file contains the deps (like
vardb) and it doesn't get updated (just like vardb).
Known long standing pitfall. It's managable.
On 20/07/14 22:28, Agostino Sarubbo wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to enable by default format-security at least in the dev
profiles.
Thought?
References:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=259417
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Format-Security-FAQ
--
Agostino
On 17/07/14 21:56, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
I guess we'll have to wait until vapier's back to get it done, tho..
imlib2 is basically normal autotools based package, there is no need to
tie it to this specific
eclass
it should be extremely trivial to revision bump it to use normal eutils,
Some history first:
When sys-fs/udisks and sys-power/upower was introduced to Portage, they
only had handful of consumers,
and there was no sys-apps/systemd in Portage
They were non problematic packages and could be considered as wrappers
that linked desktops to udev -related
functionality
But,
On 18/07/14 23:58, Georg Rudoy wrote:
2014-07-19 0:19 GMT+04:00 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org:
So, I propose:
upower with short generic description of Support for power management
udisks with short generic description of Support for storage management
Being a proxy maint of lc-vrooby
On 15/07/14 13:00, Peter Stuge wrote:
I came across this in sys-power/pm-utils-1.4.1-r2.ebuild src_install():
# NetworkManager 0.8.2 is handling suspend/resume on it's own with UPower
find ${D} -type f -name 55NetworkManager -exec rm -f '{}' +
This seems baroquely reckless, but it has been
On 15/07/14 14:18, Sergey Popov wrote:
14.07.2014 22:11, hasufell пишет:
I will continue to work with Mr_Bones_, but if any1 says there is no
problem with the games project, then he either doesn't know anything
about the situation or he doesn't want to know.
Again, you seem to be the only
's/disband the games team/move mr_bones_ to the lead of the current
team, as what's what he has been for couple of years de facto/'
*that's what
(stupid typing error)
On 09/07/14 07:24, Tom Wijsman wrote:
[...] confusions with newer people...
Ironically; my first Portage tree action add a directory got a don't
throw [expletive] into [games category] reply, before adding the ebuild.
One really can't expect new people to start to address a team like
that
On 09/07/14 18:35, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote:
В письме от Вт, 8 июля 2014 18:22:50 пользователь Samuli Suominen написал:
It seems to me like people aren't making the effort of joining to the
team and meeting the high quality
ebuild syntax they've kept up...
Samuli! With all my respect
On 08/07/14 17:18, Maxim Koltsov wrote:
2014-07-08 16:10 GMT+04:00 Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org
mailto:ri...@gentoo.org:
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org
mailto:mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
The games team believes that they're binding. In
On 08/07/14 19:17, Michael Palimaka wrote:
On 07/09/2014 01:22 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
And some personal thoughts about the initial proposal...
I don't care about the suggestion 3. in mgorny's proposal at all, but 1.
and 2. should definately
stay as is.
What authority does the game team
On 07/07/14 13:14, Greg Turner wrote:
WTF is up with it? Why does it love the first Atom so much more than
the others?
It could be such a useful feature, but, in practice, it just never
seems to do what I want it to. Is it a bug?
-gmt
short answer, yes, specially in latest ~arch
On 30/06/14 18:16, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 30/06/14 04:46 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
[snip!] * As Fabian pointed out, perl-core/Switch-2.160.0 should
still go stable. Fine with me (but I can't read your minds about
future stabilizations, and the virtual only had ~arch reverse
On 22/06/14 19:25, Bernard Cafarelli (voyageur) wrote:
voyageur14/06/22 16:25:10
Modified: wmfishtime-1.24-gtk.patch
Log:
Link with libm, spotted by patrick in bug #513908
(Portage version: 2.2.10/cvs/Linux x86_64, signed Manifest commit with key
C74525F2)
On 23/06/14 05:01, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jun 2014 20:08:41 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
LIBS = `$(PKG_CONFIG) gtk+-2.0 --libs` -lm -X11
No, it should be
LIBS = $(shell $(PKG_CONFIG) ...)
or PKG_CONFIG will be called every time LIBS is evaluated
On 04/06/14 19:21, Duncan wrote:
Rich Freeman posted on Wed, 04 Jun 2014 07:41:23 -0400 as excerpted:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yes, it *is* a simple matter of running one easy command. Portage does
that for you with trivial ease. But
On 03/06/14 14:40, J. Roeleveld wrote:
Would have been nice to fix all the dependencies BEFORE marking the
systemd- depending sys-power/upower-pm-utils stable. -- Joost
No clue what you mean, sys-power/upower-pm-utils doesn't depend on
sys-apps/systemd,
and whole Portage tree is converted to
On 03/06/14 15:08, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 07:35:42 -0400
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
This probably could have used a news item, as the change impacts both
stable and ~arch users.
Are we going to write a news item every time systemd acquires a new
mandatory
working just fine without systemd.
And UPower is for much more than hibernate/suspend, it has dozens of
features, so anykind of systemd dependency on 0.99.0 wouldn't make sense
26 May 2014; Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org
upower-0.99.0.ebuild: This release is mainly for use with
sys
On 03/06/14 16:40, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 16:28:47 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 03/06/14 16:20, Tom Wijsman wrote:
Ehm, no, version 0.9.23-r3 controls that with a systemd USE flag;
No, it doesn't.
Nevermind, `cvs up`-ed; heh, I don't understand how
On 03/06/14 16:53, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
To prevent OpenRC users from installing this version because it's
an old UPower with no pm-utils support, with no hibernate/suspend support,
to ensure desktops don't end up
On 03/06/14 17:45, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
Samuli Suominen schrieb:
On 03/06/14 16:53, Rich Freeman wrote:
So, I get why you did it, but my concern is that when you tell
portage that non-systemd users shouldn't use this package, portage
helpfully solves that problem by turning
I find this useless at this time because the work is in-progress, but in
order to silence the loud minority,
please review the news item.
Thanks!
- Samuli
Title: UPower discontinued hibernate/suspend support
Author: Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2014-06
On 03/06/14 18:43, Samuli Suominen wrote:
I find this useless at this time because the work is in-progress, but in
order to silence the loud minority,
please review the news item.
Thanks!
- Samuli
Added a line, exception for systemd users
Title: UPower discontinued hibernate/suspend
On 03/06/14 19:26, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 18:53:26 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
Title: UPower discontinued hibernate/suspend support
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GLEP:42#News_Item_Headers
You're going to hate me for mentioning this, but that is one
On 03/06/14 18:43, Samuli Suominen wrote:
I find this useless at this time because the work is in-progress, but in
order to silence the loud minority,
please review the news item.
Thanks!
- Samuli
Will commit this tonight, unless someone has more
- Samuli
Title: UPower loses hibernate
On 03/06/14 21:58, Peter Stuge wrote:
Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
Instead of belittling the users because they are wasting so much of
your time
Causing a rougher transition than neccessary is a waste of users' time.
I don't think that's awesome.
//Peter
I still don't understand how the
On 04/06/14 01:49, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 04/06/2014 00:32, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 22:24:11 +0200
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
The point is, human communication is vastly more powerful
+1
It might not be clear in the moment, because it looks like a ton of
On 04/06/14 07:11, Samuli Suominen wrote:
I'm just expecting more from our users. I don't think the news items
were ever designed for simplistic things like this.
As in, GLEP 42 Critical News Item != Learning tool for understanding
Portage output
Friendly reminder to maintainers of these new desktops that have been
'recently' added to Portage that
you should include your herd to freedesktop-b...@gentoo.org mail alias,
as it's meant to be a shared
among all the desktops. The old school desktops like gnome, kde and xfce
are there, so these
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505962#c6 is blocking stabilizing
the new virtuals,
and thus, converting the tree, and also blocking stabilization of the
already converted packages (gnome seems to have some)
pending for 3 months already
thanks,
samuli
On 01/06/14 18:48, Mikle Kolyada wrote:
01.06.2014 15:18, Samuli Suominen пишет:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505962#c6 is blocking stabilizing
the new virtuals,
and thus, converting the tree, and also blocking stabilization of the
already converted packages (gnome seems to have
On 31/05/14 05:47, Steven J. Long wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 09:57:01AM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 27/05/14 08:34, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-05-26, o godz. 23:15:34
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
UPower upstream removed sys-power/pm-utils support from 0.99
On 31/05/14 22:41, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 06:10:40PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
I can't find anyone with access that actually replies to mails, pings,
... to genkernel repository for:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461828
I'll p.mask it on amd64
On 31/05/14 23:00, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 10:46:35PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
The patch in the bug is not enough. Notice
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461828#c13
Those should be reseted to too.
Read what I applied, I did set it to .
Thanks, looks
I can't find anyone with access that actually replies to mails, pings,
... to genkernel repository for:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461828
I'll p.mask it on amd64 profiles if noone replies soon :(
- Samuli
On 30/05/14 19:10, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2014 18:10:40 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
I can't find anyone with access that actually replies to mails, pings,
... to genkernel repository for:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461828
I'll p.mask
On 30/05/14 19:16, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 30/05/14 19:10, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Fri, 30 May 2014 18:10:40 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
I can't find anyone with access that actually replies to mails, pings,
... to genkernel repository for:
https://bugs.gentoo.org
On 27/05/14 08:34, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-05-26, o godz. 23:15:34
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
UPower upstream removed sys-power/pm-utils support from 0.99 release
(currently unkeyworded in tree), as in, from current git master.
Don't worry. Looking at the past, I
UPower upstream removed sys-power/pm-utils support from 0.99 release
(currently unkeyworded in tree),
as in, from current git master.
UPower upstream created 0.9 bit branch that has the old legacy upower
with sys-power/pm-utils support
available still with --enable-deprecated.
So,
in the
chair currently, and people keep poking me regarding the issue, over any
other issues ;-(
On 26/05/14 23:15, Samuli Suominen wrote:
UPower upstream removed sys-power/pm-utils support from 0.99 release
(currently unkeyworded in tree),
as in, from current git master.
UPower upstream created
On 12/05/14 18:56, Julian Ospald (hasufell) wrote:
hasufell14/05/12 15:56:05
Added:libsdl2-2.0.3-static-libs.patch
Log:
version bump
(Portage version: 2.2.10/cvs/Linux x86_64, signed Manifest commit with key
BDEED020)
Revision ChangesPath
1.1
On 12/05/14 20:47, Peter Stuge wrote:
Rich Freeman wrote:
Longterm, this makes it year after year more difficult to develop
software for Linux.
I'm with you here, but what is the solution?
If we say we stick to upstream then we don't provide pkg-config files
at all (in these cases).
I
On 12/05/14 22:25, Peter Stuge wrote:
(Are we seriously discussing banning something useful as pkg-config
files?! That's retarded. Must be some joke.)
I don't think I said to ban them. I said that I want Gentoo to stay
close to upstream by default. I also said that maintainers shouldn't
be
On 11/05/14 20:46, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello, developers.
I'd like to raise the following item for discussion: making .xz
the default compressor used by portage for documentation, man pages
and info files. That is, the equivalent of:
PORTAGE_COMPRESS=xz
in make.globals.
I like it,
On 10/05/14 12:39, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 05/10/2014 07:31 AM, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On Sat, 2014-05-10 at 13:50 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 10 May 2014 04:34, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 05/09/2014 09:32 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Fri, 9 May 2014 16:15:58 -0400
It would take considerably amount of time to start extracting tarballs,
installing ebuilds, and reporting bugs about possible
broken .png files within packages.
The problem is broken IDAT lenght, an error that libpng15 still
gracefully ignored, but libpng16 no longer ignores.
The bug,
On 08/04/14 16:14, Samuli Suominen wrote:
mailto:klausman...
mailto:klausman...
No idea how that happened. I blame Thunderbird.
On 08/04/14 22:26, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El mar, 08-04-2014 a las 16:14 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió:
It would take considerably amount of time to start extracting tarballs,
installing ebuilds, and reporting bugs about possible
broken .png files within packages.
The problem is broken IDAT
On 08/04/14 23:26, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El mar, 08-04-2014 a las 22:25 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió:
On 08/04/14 22:26, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El mar, 08-04-2014 a las 16:14 +0300, Samuli Suominen escribió:
It would take considerably amount of time to start extracting tarballs,
installing
Extra testers requested for netifrc-0.2.2 stabilization, also, if you
know a reason this shouldn't go stable, like
regression from 0.1, speak up now.
See, http://bugs.gentoo.org/507070
(I'm purposely special casing this package over others like this.)
- Samuli
On 07/04/14 01:57, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
On 04/02/2014 02:22 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Samuli Suominen
ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
The 30 days maintainer time out stabilization policy isn't working
when package has multiple SLOTs, because
the bugs
On 02/04/14 05:02, Matt Turner wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
Projects like the Council, ComRel and QA are there to protect Gentoo;
and yes, people are (or should be) lining up to protect Gentoo.
... from QA.
You don't seem to understand what
On 02/04/14 11:28, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Wed, 02 Apr 2014 09:00:19 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 02/04/14 05:02, Matt Turner wrote:
You don't seem to understand what Samuli is saying. QA is being used
as an offensive weapon. It's a stick to bludgeon others
Problem 1:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472766#c21
I'm not sure if wildcards are supported by /etc/sandbox.d/ files
Problem 2:
I don't know if this bug is ImageMagick+OpenCL _or_ OpenCL alone
specific since emacs
is having similar issues? Assistance required from emacs maintainer to
On 02/04/14 13:45, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 2. April 2014, 10:29:28 schrieb Samuli Suominen:
On 02/04/14 11:28, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Wed, 02 Apr 2014 09:00:19 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 02/04/14 05:02, Matt Turner wrote:
You don't seem to understand
On 02/04/14 16:01, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wed 02 Apr 2014 13:01:25 Samuli Suominen wrote:
Problem 1:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472766#c21
I'm not sure if wildcards are supported by /etc/sandbox.d/ files
they are not. however, path matching is based on prefixes, so there's
The 30 days maintainer time out stabilization policy isn't working
when package has multiple SLOTs, because
the bugs are filed for only latest SLOT, where as some packages require
stabilization in sync at both SLOTs
Option 1:
Either revert the whole policy, and never CC arches on unanswered bugs
On 02/04/14 21:22, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
The 30 days maintainer time out stabilization policy isn't working
when package has multiple SLOTs, because
the bugs are filed for only latest SLOT, where as some packages
On 02/04/14 23:07, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
On 04/02/2014 02:00 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 02/04/14 05:02, Matt Turner wrote:
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
Projects like the Council, ComRel and QA are there to protect Gentoo;
and yes
1 - 100 of 1094 matches
Mail list logo
