Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] glep-0063: Add section about the Gentoo keyserver

On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 1:12 PM Mike Gilbert wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Mike Gilbert > --- > > v2: Added "This upload is required in addition to uploading the SKS pool." > > glep-0063.rst | 24 > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] use.desc: Improve description of USE=test

On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 11:57 AM Davide Pesavento wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 2:46 AM Michał Górny wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 01:54 -0400, Davide Pesavento wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 11:00 AM Michał Górny wrote: > > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] use.desc: Improve description of USE=test

On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 2:46 AM Michał Górny wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-08-21 at 01:54 -0400, Davide Pesavento wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 11:00 AM Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > > Improve the description of USE=test to clearly indicate what the flag

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] use.desc: Improve description of USE=test

On Mon, Aug 20, 2018 at 11:00 AM Michał Górny wrote: > > Improve the description of USE=test to clearly indicate what the flag > does instead of claiming it workaround for Portage. > --- > profiles/use.desc | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Changed in v2: added

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 4/4] package.use.mask: Mask ICU supprt of Qt:4 on 17.0 profiles

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 4:48 PM, wrote: > From: Andreas K. Hüttel > > --- > profiles/releases/17.0/package.use.mask | 5 + > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/profiles/releases/17.0/package.use.mask >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-portage/eclass-manpages: @DEFAULT_UNSET -> @DEFAULT-UNSET

On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 1:40 PM, Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > Dnia 29 kwietnia 2017 19:23:49 CEST, Davide Pesavento <p...@gentoo.org> > napisał(a): >>On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 1:57 AM, Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> >>wrote: >>> On sob, 20

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] app-portage/eclass-manpages: @DEFAULT_UNSET -> @DEFAULT-UNSET

On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 1:57 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > On sob, 2017-04-29 at 05:41 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> > > > > > On Fri, 28 Apr 2017, Michał Górny wrote: >> > (and hyphens do not require holding shift). >> >> So they are awkward to type inside a string that is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: leechcraft

On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Georg Rudoy <0xd34df...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2017-01-31 3:22 GMT-05:00 David Seifert : >> Proxy-maint has always been there, so no real excuse for all those bugs >> rotting away. > > I didn't bother with finding another maint who'd proxy it for me,

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] bugs.g.o: Merging UNCONFIRMED & CONFIRMED into NEW

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 16/06/16 09:47 AM, Michał Górny wrote: >> On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 16:22:32 +0300 >> Andrew Savchenko wrote: >>> >>> CONFIRMED state is useful, it means that dev or powerful user >>> confirmed this bug

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] bugs.g.o: Killing VERIFIED state, possibly introducing STABILIZED

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, everyone. > > Here's the third bugs.g.o redesign RFC. > > This time it's about closed bugs. Right now we have two states for > them: RESOLVED and VERIFIED. > > RESOLVED is the usual state that the developers use when

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] 'Gentoo Linux' bugzilla component reorganization

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 21:11:30 +0200 > Michał Górny wrote: > >> Right now we have the following components: >> >> - Applications, >> - baselayout, >> - Core system, >> - Development, >> - Eclasses and

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] 'Gentoo Linux' bugzilla component reorganization

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > I would personally go for the following layout: > > - All packages, > - Core system [includes baselayout], > - Eclasses and Profiles, > - GCC Porting, > - Hardened, > - Keywording & Stabilization, > - New packages ('New

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] New global USE flag: webp

On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > Suggested description: Add support for the WebP image format > Currently in use by the following packages: > > app-text/tesseract:webp - Enable support for webp image format. > dev-games/aseprite:webp -

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] l10n.eclass: Sort and normalize PLOCALES in l10n_find_plocales_change

On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 11:23 PM, James Le Cuirot <ch...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Sat, 7 May 2016 23:13:11 +0200 > Davide Pesavento <p...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 10:13 PM, James Le Cuirot <ch...@gentoo.org> >> wrote: >> >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] l10n.eclass: Sort and normalize PLOCALES in l10n_find_plocales_change

On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 10:13 PM, James Le Cuirot wrote: > l10n_find_plocales_change assumes that PLOCALES is sorted > alphanumerically with a single space between each entry and no > surrounding whitespace. This is not a bad assumption but it isn't > documented and it's

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 7:18 PM, Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 18:12:03 + > "Justin " <j...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> On 06/03/16 12:24, Davide Pesavento wrote: >> > On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Michał Górny <mgo.

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 12:01:19 +0100 > Michał Górny wrote: > >> Please test and review. I'm going to reply to this mail with the list >> of current metadata.xml validation failures (it's quite long). > >

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/PyQtMobility

# Davide Pesavento <p...@gentoo.org> (06 Feb 2016) # Masked for removal in 30 days. Doesn't build against recent PyQt4 # versions, bug 527572, not trivial to fix. Upstream doesn't seem to # care anymore, last release was in 2012. Zero reverse deps. dev-python/PyQtMobility

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] cmake-utils.eclass: Define default EAPI to 0

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > Dnia 26 stycznia 2016 13:36:00 CET, Davide Pesavento <p...@gentoo.org> > napisał(a): >>On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Justin Lecher <j...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>> Signed

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] cmake-utils.eclass: Define default EAPI to 0

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Justin Lecher wrote: > Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher > --- > eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass > index

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eutils.eclass: In EAPI conditionals, replace "has" by case statements.

On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 30 Nov 2015, Davide Pesavento wrote: > >>> The patch below replaces them by case statements. (Unfortunately we >>> cannot use fall-through (&;) because it is a

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 8/8] virtualx.eclass: Simplify API into single virtx()

On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 4:50 PM, Justin Lecher (jlec) <j...@gentoo.org> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > On 28/11/15 16:28, Davide Pesavento wrote: >>> else - nonfatal ${VIRTUALX_COMMAND} "$@" + >>> n

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eutils.eclass: In EAPI conditionals, replace "has" by case statements.

On Sun, Nov 29, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > As suggested by mgorny, we could use bash internals instead of the > "has" function calls in global scope. > > The patch below replaces them by case statements. (Unfortunately we > cannot use fall-through (&;) because it is

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/8] virtualx.eclass: Use case/esac to handle supported EAPIs

On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Justin Lecher wrote: > Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher > --- > eclass/virtualx.eclass | 14 -- > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/eclass/virtualx.eclass b/eclass/virtualx.eclass > index

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 8/8] virtualx.eclass: Simplify API into single virtx()

On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Justin Lecher wrote: > The new API runs all specified arguments to virtx() inside an XFVB, > instead of defining VIRTUALX_COMMAND and running that in virtualmake. > > Xemake and Xeconf should be replaced by "virtx emake" and "virtx econf". > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 11/29] python-utils-r1.eclass: Move ||die out of command substitution subshells

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 8:50 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > --- > eclass/python-utils-r1.eclass | 15 +-- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > Can't you fold this patch into the previous ones that introduced these die calls?

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: ban cmake-utils_use_* in EAPI 6

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Michael Palimaka wrote: [...] > > What do you think? +1 for banning them. Thanks, Davide

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: qt4-build.eclass

Unused since the removal of Qt 4.8.5 a few minutes ago, qt4-build.eclass will be removed in 30 days, i.e. on 2015-11-30. Best regards, Davide Pesavento

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-ruby/metasm/

On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 5:35 PM, hasufell wrote: > On 10/08/2015 11:04 PM, Richard Farina wrote: >> commit: f05eda22c275381c669e6f2a88dabd1356a3541f >> Author: Zero_Chaos gentoo org> >> AuthorDate: Thu Oct 8 20:45:33 2015 + >> Commit: Richard Farina gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: dev-ruby/metasm/

On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 5:48 PM, Patrick Lauer <patr...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > On 10/09/15 17:42, Davide Pesavento wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 5:35 PM, hasufell <hasuf...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>> On 10/08/2015 11:04 PM, Richard Farina wrote: >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Referencing bug reports in git (WAS: Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: sci-libs/opencascade/)

On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 11:30 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: On 08/09/2015 05:19 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote: Hi! On Sun, 09 Aug 2015, Sven Vermeulen wrote: On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 04:43:36PM +0200, Dirkjan

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: useflag policies

On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Sergey Popov pinkb...@gentoo.org wrote: qa team lead hat In short - apropriate REQUIRED_USE with setting recommended USE-flag(e.g. USE=+qt4 qt5 or USE=qt4 +qt5) /qa team lead hat That's most painless decision for both developers and users. Developers do

Re: [gentoo-dev] useflag policies

On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:10 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev tetrom...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 11:59 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote: On 4 August 2015 at 04:20, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: [...] Gentoo should be the best of both worlds. We should give users the power to tweak

Re: [gentoo-dev] useflag policies

On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: On 4 August 2015 at 04:20, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: [...] Gentoo should be the best of both worlds. We should give users the power to tweak things, but we shouldn't force them to play with config files all day

Re: [gentoo-dev] useflag policies

On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Dnia 2015-08-03, o godz. 00:34:51 Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org napisał(a): Recently some team members of the Qt project have adopted these ebuild policies: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Qt/Policies I have an

Re: [gentoo-dev] useflag policies

On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Andrew Savchenko birc...@gentoo.org wrote: This is a clean solution for developers and maintainers, but not for ordinary users — they will confused by qt qt4 qt5: what is 'qt', how is it

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCHSET python-utils-r1] python python-config wrapper cleanup

On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Dnia 2015-07-25, o godz. 14:24:27 Davide Pesavento p...@gentoo.org napisał(a): On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Dnia 2015-07-25, o godz. 13:37:03 Davide Pesavento p...@gentoo.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCHSET python-utils-r1] python python-config wrapper cleanup

On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: While at it, I also added some 'unsupported' wrappers to ban trying to use pythonY (accidental fallback to system python) when pythonX is selected via wrapper, and changed the exit code for unsupp-scripts. Can you clarify

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCHSET python-utils-r1] python python-config wrapper cleanup

On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Dnia 2015-07-25, o godz. 13:37:03 Davide Pesavento p...@gentoo.org napisał(a): On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 12:37 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: While at it, I also added some 'unsupported' wrappers to ban trying

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in eclass: ChangeLog qt4-build-multilib.eclass

On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 6:43 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Dnia 2015-06-12, o godz. 01:44:17 Davide Pesavento (pesa) p...@gentoo.org napisał(a): pesa15/06/12 01:44:17 Modified: ChangeLog qt4-build-multilib.eclass Log: Don't die when trying to rmdir non

Re: [gentoo-dev] Sparc Arch status

On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Jack Morgan jmor...@gentoo.org wrote: I wanted to send out an update on the Sparc arch team status. My overall plan is to reduce the total number of keywords for sparcto a more manageable level. I'd like to continue to have sparc be a stable arch for gentoo for

Re: [gentoo-dev] IA64 Arch status

On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Jack Morgan jmor...@gentoo.org wrote: I'm hoping to get some feedback from the community as to what should be supported and what can be reduced. My overall plan as I mentioned in a previous email to reduce the total number of keywords for ia64 to a more

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-user] Re: This nite's switch to full multilib

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 1:12 AM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Davide Pesavento p...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: qt is a pretty significant package to have break with multilib, and trying

Re: [gentoo-dev] multilib and different CFLAGS for 32 and 64bit ABIs

On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Matthias Schwarzott z...@gentoo.org wrote: On 29.03.2015 20:58, Matthias Schwarzott wrote: Hi there! I updated my ~amd64 system recently to new hardware (Intel Core i3-4160). Since then valgrind did no longer work for 32bit programs because -march=native did

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-user] Re: This nite's switch to full multilib

On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: I think we really need to either stabilize 4.8.6, or backport qtchooser/multilib/etc to the current stable version. Backporting is not an option. The introduction of multilib support in qt4 required extensive changes to the

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] qmake-utils.eclass: add qt{4,5}_get_bindir helper functions

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: The attached patch proposes two helper functions to be added to qmake-utils.eclass. These functions echo the correct directory where qt binaries such as moc and lrelease are located. They can be used in ebuilds when such

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] qt4-build-multilib.eclass

the existing one, to avoid destabilizing current consumers and to maintain code readability. While at it, we also refactored the code quite a bit, and rewrote some functions using a more modern style. Thanks, Davide Pesavento qt4-build-multilib.eclass Description: Binary data

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH 1/2] multibuild.eclass: make sure BUILD_DIR exists before pushd'ing into it.

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 10:30 PM, Davide Pesavento p...@gentoo.org wrote: Index: multibuild.eclass === RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/eclass/multibuild.eclass,v retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -r1.18 multibuild.eclass

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/2] multilib-minimal.eclass: use run_in_build_dir().

On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 11:08 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Dnia 2014-10-23, o godz. 22:31:39 Davide Pesavento p...@gentoo.org napisał(a): Index: multilib-minimal.eclass === RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/eclass

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] multibuild.eclass: make sure BUILD_DIR exists before pushd'ing into it.

Index: multibuild.eclass === RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/eclass/multibuild.eclass,v retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -r1.18 multibuild.eclass --- multibuild.eclass 10 May 2014 21:36:49 - 1.18 +++ multibuild.eclass 23 Oct

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/2] multilib-minimal.eclass: use run_in_build_dir().

Index: multilib-minimal.eclass === RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/eclass/multilib-minimal.eclass,v retrieving revision 1.9 diff -u -r1.9 multilib-minimal.eclass --- multilib-minimal.eclass 2 May 2014 16:16:37 - 1.9 +++

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-im/qutim

# Davide Pesavento p...@gentoo.org (20 Oct 2014) # Does not build with any in-tree version of cmake since 20140713 (bug 506614). # Jabber plugin is broken (bug 464690). Masked for removal in 30 days. net-im/qutim

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: kde5 and kde5-functions eclass

kde5.eclass case ${KDE_TEST} in false) ;; *) IUSE+= test DEPEND+= test? ( dev-qt/qttest:5 ) No =${QT_MINIMAL} in this dep? else unpack ${A} I think you can use `default` if ! in_iuse examples || ! use examples ; then if ! use_if_iuse examples ; then if ! in_iuse test || ! use test

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: kde5 and kde5-functions eclass

kde5-functions.eclass inherit versionator versionator doesn't export any phase functions so it can stay inside the _KDE5_FUNCTIONS_ECLASS conditional block. case ${EAPI:-0} in I believe :-0 is unnecessary here, *) will match anyway, but it doesn't hurt either. *) die EAPI=${EAPI} is not

Re: [gentoo-dev] My masterplan for git migration (+ looking for infra to test it)

On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: We have main developer repo where developers work commit and are relatively happy. For every push into developer repo, automated magic thingie merges stuff into user sync repo and updates the metadata cache there. How

Re: [gentoo-dev] My masterplan for git migration (+ looking for infra to test it)

On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 3:55 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: Davide Pesavento: In any case, we would likely strip the history anyway to get a small repo to work with. I have prepared a basic git update hook that keeps master clean and attached it to the bug [1]. It enforces basic

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] qt5-build.eclass

On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Davide Pesavento p...@gentoo.org wrote: I will commit the eclass in about 7-10 days from now, unless major problems are found during the review. The actual Qt5 packages will follow soon thereafter, initially under package.mask. The eclass is now in tree

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] qt5-build.eclass

On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Dnia 2014-08-17, o godz. 20:38:18 Davide Pesavento p...@gentoo.org napisał(a): # @FUNCTION: qt5-build_src_unpack # @DESCRIPTION: # Unpacks the sources. qt5-build_src_unpack() { if [[ $(gcc-major-version) -lt 4

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] qt5-build.eclass

Hi guys, In preparation for moving Qt5 to gentoo-x86 (finally!), please review the attached eclass that is inherited by every Qt5 ebuild. If you want to get an idea about how the ebuild code looks like, see any ebuild in the dev-qt category of our overlay that inherits the eclass:

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] qt5-build.eclass

On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Maxim Koltsov maksbo...@gentoo.org wrote: For the record: I /think/ that an eclass for packages supporting both qt4 and qt5 (using multibuild.eclass) /might/ be useful. Looking forward to hearing Qt team opinion. Maybe. But you'll have to convince me. We

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] qt4-r2.eclass: simplify doc handling

On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Sergey Popov pinkb...@gentoo.org wrote: As we should not do anything crazy with DOCS and HTML_DOCS, let's simplify our eclass It's not about doing anything crazy... einstalldocs simply didn't exist at the time. Anyway, ACK from me. And please remember to

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: enabling ipc-sandbox network-sandbox by default

On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi, everyone. Almost 9 months ago I've committed three new FEATURES for portage: cgroup, ipc-sandbox and network-sandbox. Today I'd like to propose enabling at least the latter two by default. +1 I've been using all

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots

On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 7:39 PM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 26/09/13 11:24 AM, Davide Pesavento wrote: On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote: On 26 September 2013 19:53, Michał Górny mgo

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots

On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 4:44 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Dnia 2013-09-26, o godz. 17:24:49 Davide Pesavento p...@gentoo.org napisał(a): On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote: On 26 September 2013 19:53, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Policy for migrating library consumers to subslots

On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote: On 26 September 2013 19:53, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: How do we handle packages which install multiple libraries? I'm afraid forcing such a policy and/or hurrying developers to adapt will only cause more

Re: [gentoo-dev] revbumping ebuilds after USE dependency changes

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Alex Alexander wi...@gentoo.org wrote: Hello, Please revbump an ebuild after changing its USE dependencies. Using net-p2p/transmission as an example, it used to depend on

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] multilib-build.eclass and restricting unsupported ABIs

On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote: Alexis Ballier schrieb: On Mon, 04 Mar 2013 21:17:50 +0100 Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote: dev-db/mysql abiwrapper dev-lang/perl abiwrapper dev-lang/python abiwrapper dev-lang/ruby abiwrapper

Re: [gentoo-dev] The Gentoo Qt Project wants your help!

On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sat, 02 Mar 2013 15:29:38 +0200 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: The embedded FFmpeg in avidemux is only patched to convert UNIX line endings to DOS line endings to match rest of the avidemux source tree

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Qt category move

On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote: On 17/02/2013 23:04, Markos Chandras wrote: We will use qt* instead of qt-*[1] to match the way upstream names the modules. So that would be dev-qt/qtcore etc Thanks, and thanks for the link, as I wouldn't

Re: [gentoo-dev] USE flags dri, cups, pppd

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote: During the server profile discussion, it became clear that we could clean up the base profiles a bit. This is unrelated to the profile versions, as the change would affect all versions (well, at least without

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] Set default EGIT_SOURCEDIR to point to standard ${WORKDIR}/${P}. It allows ${S} overriding in user's code as other eclasses do:

, Davide Pesavento (pesa)

Re: [gentoo-dev] packages which won't support x32

On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote: This is the case with dev-lang/v8: it doesn't build on x32 (https://bugs.gentoo.org/423815), and upstream said they *won't* support x32 (https://groups.google.com/d/msg/v8-users/c-_URSZqTq8/7wHl095t2CMJ). Note

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Fwd: Heads up for Qt5

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: On 28 July 2012 13:59, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote: On 28/07/12 08:22, Ben de Groot wrote: In preparation for that, we want to ask maintainers of all ebuilds in the tree with dependencies on Qt4, to make sure

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Fwd: Heads up for Qt5

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:56 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote: On 28/07/12 09:46, Davide Pesavento wrote: On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: On 28 July 2012 13:59, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote: [...] So what would

Re: [gentoo-dev] Don't require assignment of empty variables in ebuilds?

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 07:53:37PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: Our current policy [1] requires that ebuilds must assign the seven variables DESCRIPTION, HOMEPAGE, SRC_URI, LICENSE, SLOT, KEYWORDS, and IUSE, even if

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: using array variables in qt4-r2.eclass

On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sat, 14 Jul 2012 12:29:59 +0200 Davide Pesavento p...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 15:26:58 +0200 Davide Pesavento p...@gentoo.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: using array variables in qt4-r2.eclass

On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 13:00:47 +0200 Davide Pesavento p...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sat, Jul 14, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sat, 14 Jul 2012 12:29:59 +0200 Davide Pesavento p...@gentoo.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: using array variables in qt4-r2.eclass

On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 5:53 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 17:36:05 +0200 Davide Pesavento p...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, 15 Jul 2012 13:00:47 +0200 Davide Pesavento p...@gentoo.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: using array variables in qt4-r2.eclass

On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 15:26:58 +0200 Davide Pesavento p...@gentoo.org wrote: [...] + # backward compatibility for non-array variables + if [[ -n ${DOCS} ]] [[ $(declare -p DOCS 2/dev/null 21) != declare

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: using array variables in qt4-r2.eclass

On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 20:02:19 +0800 Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: --- /usr/portage/eclass/qt4-r2.eclass 2012-04-20 07:01:13.0 +0800 +++ qt4-r2.eclass.new2012-07-13 19:45:59.259773917 +0800 @@

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/apiextractor, dev-python/generatorrunner

# Both have been merged into =dev-python/shiboken-1.1.1. # Removal in 30 days. dev-python/apiextractor dev-python/generatorrunner signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] About forcing rebuilds of other packages issue

On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 13:55:53 -0700 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: A dependency atom will have optional SLOT and ABI_SLOT parts. Using the dbus-glib depedency on glib:2 as an example [1], the dbus-glib

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES=userpriv usersandbox by default?

On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi, In case you aren't familiar with FEATURES=userpriv, here's the description from the make.conf(5) man page:  Allow portage to drop root privileges and compile packages as  portage:portage without a sandbox (unless

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-sound/qsampler

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Natanael Olaiz nol...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Here I attach a version that removes the eclass use. I then replaced a eqmake4 for qmake. I don't know if there is a better solution, but at least removes the deprecated eclass and hopefully the mask (the live ebuild

Re: [gentoo-dev] add global useflag: webkit

On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 2:34 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: # grep :webkit use.local.desc | wc -l 33 I would vote to make this a global useflag: webkit - Adds support for the webkit library/module I suggest the following description: Add support for the WebKit HTML

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-sound/qsampler

# It has been broken for more than 2 years (bug 380589), # last upstream release in 2009, uses deprecated qt4 eclass, # long list of QA issues (bug 379663). # Masked for removal in 30 days. media-sound/qsampler signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Add USE_PYTHON to profiles/info_vars

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 18:10, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote: python.eclass looks at the USE_PYTHON variable to determine which python versions to target when building python packages which support installation for multiple python abis. Having it in the emerge --info output would be

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: x11-libs/qt

in portage (or overlays) will pull in the split # modules they need as dependency. Unmasking this will most likely pull in # more than you need. # Davide Pesavento p...@gentoo.org (08 Dec 2011) # Now superseded by x11-libs/qt-meta. Removal on 18 Dec 2011. =x11-libs/qt-4* (only 10 days of grace