Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

* Michael Orlitzky [150923 08:31]: > On 09/23/2015 04:40 AM, Todd Goodman wrote: > > > > We haven't had too many problems with it. Most of our problems seem to > > be with people having issues with git itself (it was new to almost > > everyone on the team) and not embracing a

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On 09/24/2015 09:59 AM, Todd Goodman wrote: Again, I'm not arguing for or against Gerrit, just relating my experience with it. Hello Todd, I'm not a dev, but I have over a dozen ebuilds I have hacked together. They need work, and there are devs who are helping me. Some of these ebuilds are

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

* James Le Cuirot [150924 04:55]: > On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 21:55:00 -0700 > Daniel Campbell wrote: > > > I hadn't thought about that angle. If our access backbone is via SSH > > (and thus the filesystem/machine users) then I'm really not sure how > > to implement

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On Wed, 23 Sep 2015 21:55:00 -0700 Daniel Campbell wrote: > I hadn't thought about that angle. If our access backbone is via SSH > (and thus the filesystem/machine users) then I'm really not sure how > to implement a GitLab or Gerrit instance while hooking into the > filesystem.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On 09/23/2015 04:40 AM, Todd Goodman wrote: > > We haven't had too many problems with it. Most of our problems seem to > be with people having issues with git itself (it was new to almost > everyone on the team) and not embracing a good workflow with it (or > trying to only use git via Eclipse.)

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 09/23/2015 05:30 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 09/23/2015 04:40 AM, Todd Goodman wrote: >> >> We haven't had too many problems with it. Most of our problems >> seem to be with people having issues with git itself (it was new >> to almost

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 20:12:06 -0400 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > Has anyone ever set up Gitlab or Gerrit, managed by a package manager, > in a way that a small bug won't grant anonymous write access to every > single repository? > > Web projects tend to assume that they're the only

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On 09/19/2015 05:16 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > > We'd just need a developer who's experienced in maintaining and > setting them up. > Has anyone ever set up Gitlab or Gerrit, managed by a package manager, in a way that a small bug won't grant anonymous write access to every single repository?

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 09/16/2015 03:07 PM, Maciej Mrozowski wrote: > On Saturday 12 of September 2015 21:12:25 Michał Górny wrote: > > | What are your thoughts? Any other proposals? > > Well, there's always an option to set up infra hosted Gerrit or > Gitlab and

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 09/19/2015 05:12 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 09/19/2015 05:16 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote: >> >> We'd just need a developer who's experienced in maintaining and >> setting them up. >> > > Has anyone ever set up Gitlab or Gerrit, managed by

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On Saturday 12 of September 2015 21:12:25 Michał Górny wrote: | What are your thoughts? Any other proposals? Well, there's always an option to set up infra hosted Gerrit or Gitlab and forget about Github workflow altogether... regards MM signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 15:37:17 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 13 września 2015 11:48:54 CEST, Jason Zaman > napisał(a): > >On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 09:12:25PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > >> Potential solution: bi-dir github <=> bugzilla integration > >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

El lun, 14-09-2015 a las 00:19 +0300, Andrew Savchenko escribió: [...] > Yes, but as long as choice of core components and infrastructure is > free one. Read Gentoo Social Contract: > > https://www.gentoo.org/get-started/philosophy/social-contract.html > > "However, Gentoo will never depend upon

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 09:12:25PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > Potential solution: bi-dir github <=> bugzilla integration > == > > My current idea would be pretty much that: > > 1. a new dedicated Gentoo bug would be automatically created

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 09:12:25PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > Potential solution: bi-dir github <=> bugzilla integration > == I just noticed this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-settings/+bug/1308105 it appears to mirror

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

Dnia 13 września 2015 11:48:54 CEST, Jason Zaman napisał(a): >On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 09:12:25PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: >> Potential solution: bi-dir github <=> bugzilla integration >> == >> >> My current idea

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On 09/13/2015 07:56 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > Gentoo workflow should not depend on a proprietary tools like > github issue tracker and github pull requests. > It doesn't. That's what this thread is about, so people who refuse to collaborate on github PRs can still collaborate on bugzilla.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

Dnia 2015-09-13, o godz. 20:56:07 Andrew Savchenko napisał(a): > On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 21:12:25 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > > Hello, everyone. > > > > The current workflow for handling github pull requests is at least > > suboptimal. Handling pull requests takes a fair effort

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:27:32 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2015-09-13, o godz. 20:56:07 > Andrew Savchenko napisał(a): > > > On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 21:12:25 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > > > Hello, everyone. > > > > > > The current workflow for handling github pull requests is

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:21:02 +0200 hasufell wrote: > On 09/13/2015 07:56 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > > > Gentoo workflow should not depend on a proprietary tools like > > github issue tracker and github pull requests. > > > > It doesn't. That's what this thread is about, so people who

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 00:07:26 +0300 Andrew Savchenko wrote: > On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:21:02 +0200 hasufell wrote: > > On 09/13/2015 07:56 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > > Gentoo workflow should not depend on a proprietary tools like > > > github issue tracker and github pull

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 22:13:30 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 00:07:26 +0300 > Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:21:02 +0200 hasufell wrote: > > > On 09/13/2015 07:56 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > > > Gentoo workflow should not depend on a

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 21:12:25 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, everyone. > > The current workflow for handling github pull requests is at least > suboptimal. Handling pull requests takes a fair effort from the few > developers contributing there, and the progress is often stalled by > package

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

Dnia 2015-09-13, o godz. 19:27:17 Jason Zaman napisał(a): > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 09:12:25PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > > Potential solution: bi-dir github <=> bugzilla integration > > == > > I just noticed this:

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On 09/13/2015 11:19 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > Yes, but as long as choice of core components and infrastructure is > free one. Read Gentoo Social Contract: > > https://www.gentoo.org/get-started/philosophy/social-contract.html > > "However, Gentoo will never depend upon a piece of

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michał Górny schrieb: > I don't know if you didn't read the proposal, or if you are unable to > understand it. You are seriously *offending* me and the few other > developers who are trying *really hard*. > > So let me make this clear: I am trying

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

I agree. I think that any "master" version of whatever repo we use should be hosted on gentoo owned infrastructure. Github might be allowed to take pull requests but I think it should be a slave to whatever's hosted on gentoo. That way if anything gets screwed up on github gentoo could always

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

Dnia 2015-09-14, o godz. 00:19:38 Andrew Savchenko napisał(a): > On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 22:13:30 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Sep 2015 00:07:26 +0300 > > Andrew Savchenko wrote: > > > On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:21:02 +0200 hasufell wrote: > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 9:02 PM, Raymond Jennings wrote: > I agree. I think that any "master" version of whatever repo we use should > be hosted on gentoo owned infrastructure. > > Github might be allowed to take pull requests but I think it should be a > slave to whatever's

[gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

Hello, everyone. The current workflow for handling github pull requests is at least suboptimal. Handling pull requests takes a fair effort from the few developers contributing there, and the progress is often stalled by package maintainers which are either unresponsive or not registered on github

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am Samstag, 12. September 2015, 21:12:25 schrieb Michał Górny: > Potential solution: bi-dir github <=> bugzilla integration > == The general idea is nice and neat. > - handling comment edits

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 21:12:25 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > 1. Many of the Gentoo developers have different nicknames on GitHub. > Some developers don't even set their real names which makes them even > harder to find. This isn't directly related to your proposal, but may I jump

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 10:11:27PM +0200, hasufell wrote: > We should probably auto-attach the patch from the pull request. This > can easily be done with link-rewriting, e.g.: > https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/83 to > https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/83.patch > yields a nice

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On 09/12/2015 09:12 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > Potential solution: bi-dir github <=> bugzilla integration > == > > My current idea would be pretty much that: > > 1. a new dedicated Gentoo bug would be automatically created for every >

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am Samstag, 12. September 2015, 23:31:11 schrieb W. Trevor King: > Right, thanks. In that case, I think you'll need a hook to push a new > patch whenever the GitHub branch is updated, rebased, etc. That could > make for a lot of Bugzilla spam,

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On 09/12/2015 11:07 PM, W. Trevor King wrote: > On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 10:11:27PM +0200, hasufell wrote: >> We should probably auto-attach the patch from the pull request. This >> can easily be done with link-rewriting, e.g.: >> https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/83 to >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 11:15:14PM +0200, hasufell wrote: > Because that is not a valid bug report. Patches must be attached to > bugzilla. Right, thanks. In that case, I think you'll need a hook to push a new patch whenever the GitHub branch is updated, rebased, etc. That could make for a lot

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On Sun, Sep 13, 2015 at 01:30:44PM +1200, Kent Fredric wrote: > If the patch is automatedly filed against bugzilla, people will > assume viewing that patch tells them all they need to know. > > But the reality is somebody may rebase/amend/repush to the > publicised branch location before any

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFI: A better workflow for github pull requests

On 13 September 2015 at 09:15, hasufell wrote: > Because that is not a valid bug report. Patches must be attached to > bugzilla. I would recommend against attaching the pull in patch form against bugzilla. It might lead to unintentionally misleading consequences. If the