On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 08:06:48PM +0100, Felix Kuperjans wrote:
Mike Gilbert:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Felix Kuperjans
fe...@desaster-games.com wrote:
Samuli Suominen wrote:
please review this news item, seems we need one after all
Hello Samuli,
/dev/root is no longer
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
please review this news item, seems we need one after all
Here's a crazy idea: can we patch our kernel to let make oldconfig
default CONFIG_DEVTMPFS to true? Or better yet, request that this is
changed upstream?
Also,
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:19 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
please review this news item, seems we need one after all
Here's a crazy idea: can we patch our kernel to let make oldconfig
default
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
I could see making that the default if there is no .config file
present and a new one is being created, and perhaps upstream would
support that since udev is popular. However, make oldconfig is
usually used when you have a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 25/01/13 04:19 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Samuli Suominen
ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
Also, after installing udev-197, are there any negative
consequences to just downgrading to -171 again?
Depends on
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
Depends on whether or not you rebuilt the rdeps -- udev-197 provides
libudev.so.1 while udev-171 provides libudev.so.0 , so there's
breakage on stuffs like lvm2 and other ebuilds that link to libudev
Even so, I could
On 25/01/2013 15:23, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
Even so, I could downgrade and revdep-rebuild after that, and it
should Just Work, right?
Yes and no — you're safer if you get rid of the .so.1 first then
revdep-rebuild (if you're using preserved-libs). I know there should be
support for ldconfig NOT
On 01/23/13 19:29, Felix Kuperjans wrote:
Samuli Suominen wrote:
please review this news item, seems we need one after all
/dev/root is no longer available in this udev version, so people who put
this in their /etc/fstab might end up with an unbootable system.
I suggest including in the
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:02 AM, Michael Haubenwallner ha...@gentoo.org wrote:
The only way I've found to keep the system bootable with both kernels
(for the upgrade process until the new kernel config was good enough)
was to replace /dev/cciss/c0d0p1 by /dev/root in /etc/fstab.
How would
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 23/01/13 05:21 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El mié, 23-01-2013 a las 23:45 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió:
On 23/01/13 23:21, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El mié, 23-01-2013 a las 15:14 +0200, Samuli Suominen
escribió:
please review this news item, seems
On 01/24/13 05:02, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
I've recently upgraded some server from kernel-2.6.28 to kernel-3.5.7 and
encountered that the root-device was renamed from /dev/cciss/c0d0p1 to
/dev/sda1 due to some kernel driver change (took me a while to find out).
I'm not using genkernel
On 01/24/13 16:49, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 01/24/13 05:02, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
I've recently upgraded some server from kernel-2.6.28 to kernel-3.5.7 and
encountered that the root-device was renamed from /dev/cciss/c0d0p1 to
/dev/sda1 due to some kernel driver change (took me a
On 24/01/2013 20:19, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Yep, this is a HP DL380 G6, and lspci says:
04:00.0 RAID bus controller: Hewlett-Packard Company Smart Array G6
controllers (rev 01)
Hrm just for reference, I've got a number of G6s and they all work fine
with the old cciss — although they do
please review this news item, seems we need one after all
Title: Upgrading udev from 171 (or older) to 197
Author: Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2013-01-23
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
Display-If-Installed: sys-fs/udev-
Upgrading udev from 171 (or
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
please review this news item, seems we need one after all
+1, this would have been useful.
On 23 January 2013 13:32, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
please review this news item, seems we need one after all
+1, this would have been useful.
Looks ok but as the news item says, it's a bit too late ...
On 23/01/13 15:34, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 23 January 2013 13:32, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
please review this news item, seems we need one after all
+1, this would have been useful.
Looks ok but
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
not for everyone, not everyone upgrades this often, and it's usually the
servers that get updated last
Agreed, but best to get this out ASAP.
Only question - display-if-installed is set to . Would it make
sense
130123 Samuli Suominen wrote:
please review this news item, seems we need one after all
...
- The need of CONFIG_DEVTMPFS=y in the kernel; need to verify the fstype for
possible /dev line in /etc/fstab is devtmpfs (and not, for example, tmpfs)
...
I have 2 such lines :
tmpfs
On 23/01/2013 15:02, Philip Webb wrote:
- The need of CONFIG_DEVTMPFS=y in the kernel; need to verify the fstype
for
possible /dev line in /etc/fstab is devtmpfs (and not, for example,
tmpfs)
...
I have 2 such lines :
tmpfs /tmptmpfs
On 23/01/13 15:44, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
not for everyone, not everyone upgrades this often, and it's usually the
servers that get updated last
Agreed, but best to get this out ASAP.
Only question -
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò
flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
None are involved. The second column would read /dev if it was involved.
The news item doesn't mention what to do if there is no line to mount
/dev. I don't see one in my fstab, and I simply followed the handbook
On 23/01/2013 16:04, Rich Freeman wrote:
System seems to work fine, so I'm not sure how essential that line is.
The fact that I'm using an initramfs might also have an effect.
AFAICT if you do NOT have a /dev entry you're the best off because the
init script will mount it for you.
I think the
Hi,
On 01/23/2013 04:04 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
System seems to work fine, so I'm not sure how essential that line is.
The fact that I'm using an initramfs might also have an effect.
I'd strongly suggest using CONFIG_DEVTMPFS_MOUNT=y.
and stop worring about udev/openrc.
udev/openrc stopped
Samuli Suominen wrote:
please review this news item, seems we need one after all
Hello Samuli,
/dev/root is no longer available in this udev version, so people who put
this in their /etc/fstab might end up with an unbootable system.
I suggest including in the news item, that /dev/root must be
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Felix Kuperjans
fe...@desaster-games.com wrote:
Samuli Suominen wrote:
please review this news item, seems we need one after all
Hello Samuli,
/dev/root is no longer available in this udev version, so people who put
this in their /etc/fstab might end up with
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
fstab is not consulted for mounting the root filesystem, so it doesn't
really matter what you have in there. Either the kernel mounts it
based on the kernel command line, or your initramfs mounts it based on
whatever your
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:42 PM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
fstab is not consulted for mounting the root filesystem, so it doesn't
really matter what you have in there. Either the kernel mounts it
based on the
Mike Gilbert:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Felix Kuperjans
fe...@desaster-games.com wrote:
Samuli Suominen wrote:
please review this news item, seems we need one after all
Hello Samuli,
/dev/root is no longer available in this udev version, so people who put
this in their /etc/fstab
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
Ah, good to know. I'm used to dealing with my little homegrown
initramfs, where I parse root from the kernel command line in /init.
genkernel does the same thing.
Yeah, dracut generally does the right thing but that
El mié, 23-01-2013 a las 15:14 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió:
please review this news item, seems we need one after all
Why don't you drop ~ from:
CONFIG_CHECK=~DEVTMPFS
to ensure people really changes it in their kernel and prevent breakage?
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On 23/01/13 23:21, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El mié, 23-01-2013 a las 15:14 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió:
please review this news item, seems we need one after all
Why don't you drop ~ from:
CONFIG_CHECK=~DEVTMPFS
to ensure people really changes it in their kernel and prevent breakage?
Are you sure? I have CONFIG_DEVTMPFS_MOUNT disabled, latest stable udev
(197-r3) and openrc (0.11.8), and no /dev line in my fstab, yet my /dev
is still a devtmpfs with a proper set of device nodes.
Chris
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 17:03:15 +0100
Michael Weber x...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi,
On
El mié, 23-01-2013 a las 23:45 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió:
On 23/01/13 23:21, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El mié, 23-01-2013 a las 15:14 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió:
please review this news item, seems we need one after all
Why don't you drop ~ from:
CONFIG_CHECK=~DEVTMPFS
2013/1/23 Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org
El mié, 23-01-2013 a las 23:45 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió:
On 23/01/13 23:21, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El mié, 23-01-2013 a las 15:14 +0200, Samuli Suominen escribió:
please review this news item, seems we need one after all
Why don't you drop
On 23/01/13 21:06, Felix Kuperjans wrote:
Mike Gilbert:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Felix Kuperjans
fe...@desaster-games.com wrote:
Samuli Suominen wrote:
please review this news item, seems we need one after all
Hello Samuli,
/dev/root is no longer available in this udev version, so
36 matches
Mail list logo
