On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 02:34:22PM -0700, Alan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 10:05:28PM +0100, Angel Gabriel wrote:
>
> > Is there any spam filters out there, that can maybe redflag certain
> > email, which it thinks is spam, so that I can use my mailer to filter it
> > out, and then change the
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 09:23:41PM -0500, Alec Berryman wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 19:40, Vano D wrote:
>
> > Note that I split the thing into 640 megs so I can store it into a CDROM
> > and that I make the filename with the date extension.
>
> Dumb question: I'm new to split; can you untar e
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 11:28:29AM +0200, Lars Geiger wrote:
> Although I wouldn't compress the archive at all in this case, at
> least not when there is enough free space on the FAT32 partition.
> Compression only takes more time and as you usually won't keep the
> archive for a longer time, I'd p
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 10:53:36AM -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> I can type just fine :). i was just never a fan of vi. Its nothing but
> personal preferance.
That's one thing I've always been amazed by. That a community that
often loath everything Microsoft because it forces them to think
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 06:40:07PM -0500, Owen Ford wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 18:15, Marius Mauch wrote:
> > On 07/21/03 Brian Budge wrote:
> >
> > > Is there anything about nedit that is better than emacs or vim other
> > > than the quicker learning time?
> >
> > Don't know vim, but it's a
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 12:49:41AM +0200, Sebastian Hungerecker wrote:
> > Is emacs an X app? Or console based?
> It's both (like vim, too)
Isn't vim dependant on gtk when running as a X app though? I think the
OP (for some unknown reason) didn't want an application that depended
on either GTK or
On Sat, Jul 19, 2003 at 10:15:11PM -0400, MIKE MacMartin wrote:
> Anyone here mud? If so, do you have a favourite client for Linux? Is it in
> portage?
>
Back when I mudded I used 'powwow'. It was derived from 'tintin',
which in turn was derived from 'cancan', IIRC.
The main reasons I used it
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 03:23:29PM -0400, brett holcomb wrote:
>
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 13:31:01 -0500
> "Mike Bellemare" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >$ cat /etc/hostname
> >
> >wolverine
> >
> What about doing a hex dump of the file. Maybe there are
> some noprintable characters in the file t
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 09:28:05PM +0200, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
> On Wednesday 16 July 2003 18:03, Fredrik Jagenheim wrote:
> >
> > Missed the original post, but if someone is keeping track, here's my
> > data:
>
> you should have read the original post
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 11:48:14AM -0400, Christopher Fisk wrote:
> >Perhaps you may answer with the operating system you use the most,
> >besides Gentoo...
Missed the original post, but if someone is keeping track, here's my
data:
For total time, I guess Debian wins. Considering it's running 24/
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 04:34:05PM +0200, Spider wrote:
> You do run spamd instead of SpamAssassin directly, I hope, yes?
Of course. :)
Actually, I didn't until about 3-4 months ago when I started to
think about replacing spamassassin for some Bayes filtering software,
hoping that it would take m
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 03:55:52AM -0300, Norberto BENSA wrote:
> Robin H.Johnson wrote:
> > Total of 4 processors activated (21272.97 BogoMIPS).
>
> Detected 1000.175 MHz processor.
> Calibrating delay loop... 1990.65 BogoMIPS
This is my mail/web/ssl/ssh/firewall/shell gateway:
Detected 133.639
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 04:49:10PM +0200, Christian Aust wrote:
>
> [Snip about FS on laptops]
>
> Exactly, esp. when you happen to have a ACPI-only laptop: Sometimes you
> don't know when your battery runs out.
I know exactly when my laptop will run out of battery using ACPI.
Since ACPI gives m
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 05:01:19PM -0400, Kirtis Bakalarczyk wrote:
> > Here's a (short) snippet from my errors:
> >
> > modprobe: Can't locate module /dev/kbd
> > modprobe: Can't locate module /dev/video
> > modprobe: Can't locate module video* which is needed for /dev/video*
>
> I had this exac
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 08:44:13PM -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote:
>
> Hmm, you're doing it the hard way, no doubts :-)
>
> # ACCEPT_KEYWORDS="~x86" emerge whateverpackage
This is what I do. However, whenever I later do a
emerge -u world, my will be downgraded to the old
version.
I'm trying to f
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 01:51:37PM +0100, Arturo di Gioia wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 13:49, Ernie Schroder wrote:
> >
> > kate! I want kate on the live CD! :)
>
> Xfree, Wine and Notepad on stage1! ;-P
Bah, use free software! I say OpenOffice on stage1 for all editing
needs. ;)
//Humming, u
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 02:21:03PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Take another look at the ebuild. The package is masked for x86.
>
> KEYWORDS="~x86 -ppc -sparc -alpha"
>
Ah, didn't know that packages could be masked inside the ebuild also.
Shame there is no explanation to why though. Guess
Can someone help me what I'm missing?
I have rar-3.0 installed. I see that rar-3.11 is available for
download, so naturally I rsync.
Still, there are no rar 3.11 available for update. So I look in
/usr/portage/app-arch/rar to check if I can help out making an ebuild
for it and share it on bugzill
18 matches
Mail list logo
