Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrading to gcc 4.1: emerge -e world required?

Richard Fish wrote: On 5/27/06, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: And also pardon me, when I'm annoyed because of too bold statements which turn out to be wrong. If it says "no problems expected", then that's what I expect. I don't expect to run into deep problems. And the GWN and upgra

Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrading to gcc 4.1: emerge -e world required?

Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: I don't know what 'upgrade guide' you have read, but: The gcc upgrade doc. The one, to which there is a link in the GWN. Which part of the upgrade guide did you not follw? I followed the part, which said, that no additional work was required. The part, which is

Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrade problem with perl-cleaner

Richard Fish wrote: > On 5/27/06, Colleen Beamer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> !!! Digest verification Failed: >> !!! /usr/portage/distfiles/perl-cleaner-1.03.tar.gz >> !!! Readon: Filesize does not match recorded size > > > First, try to simply remove the offending distfile and allow it to be >

Re: [gentoo-user] net-nntp/klibido

On 5/27/06, JimD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Richard Fish wrote: > I'll let you know in a week or so once my emerge -e world finishes... :-) Same here. Rebuilding world should take a while. Hold the phone!! OOo just completed building on my system in 4h 08m 07s. When I get some time I'm goin

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: "hostname -d" returns no domainname

On Friday 26 May 2006 04:43, Alexander Skwar wrote: > I don't think that I can set a "domain entry" in resolv.conf, as it's > generated by dhcpcd. The domainname start up script starts before DHCP so yes it would set it. It doesn't depend on net. > What does the DNSDOMAIN setting in /etc/conf.d/

Re: [gentoo-user] net-nntp/klibido

Richard Fish wrote: > I'll let you know in a week or so once my emerge -e world finishes... :-) Same here. Rebuilding world should take a while. > Actually the last time I did this, it took about 16 hours to rebuild > everythingof course that was with openoffice-bin which I don't use > any

Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrade problem with perl-cleaner

Rumen Yotov wrote: >Colleen Beamer wrote: > > >>Hi, >> >>I really have very little problem with my Gentoo system, but today on an >>upgrade I received the following message related to perl-cleaner: >> >>!!! Digest verification Failed: >>!!! /usr/portage/distfiles/perl-cleaner-1.03.tar.gz >>!!! R

Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrade problem with perl-cleaner

Colleen Beamer wrote: > Hi, > > I really have very little problem with my Gentoo system, but today on an > upgrade I received the following message related to perl-cleaner: > > !!! Digest verification Failed: > !!! /usr/portage/distfiles/perl-cleaner-1.03.tar.gz > !!! Readon: Filesize does not ma

Re: [gentoo-user] eth0 does not exist

On 5/27/06, Kenneth Hopping <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The problem appears to be that /sys/class/net/eth0 does not exist. This is a pseudo-filesystem like proc that I cannot manipulate. Is there some configuration file that needs initialization or a package that I need to install? No, you just

Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrade problem with perl-cleaner

Colleen Beamer wrote: Hi, I really have very little problem with my Gentoo system, but today on an upgrade I received the following message related to perl-cleaner: !!! Digest verification Failed: !!! /usr/portage/distfiles/perl-cleaner-1.03.tar.gz !!! Readon: Filesize does not match recorded s

Re: [gentoo-user] net-nntp/klibido

On 5/27/06, JimD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Part of me wanting to try kde again was because of the nice speed increase with startup times and gcc 4.1. However, I don't know if this is try from experience. Is kde 3.5 noticeably faster when compiled with gcc 4.1? I'll let you know in a week or

[gentoo-user] eth0 does not exist

I'm installing linux-2.6.16-gentoo-r7. Network initialization fails during startup: * Starting eth0 * Loading networking modules for eth0 * modules: iptunnel ifconfig dhcpcd apipa * ifconfig provides interface * dhcpcd provides dhcp * Bringing up eth0 * dhcp * eth0

Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrade problem with perl-cleaner

On 5/27/06, Colleen Beamer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: !!! Digest verification Failed: !!! /usr/portage/distfiles/perl-cleaner-1.03.tar.gz !!! Readon: Filesize does not match recorded size You should check the mail-list archives here...it has come up a couple of times in the last day or so. Fir

Re: [gentoo-user] subscribe

David Relson wrote: > subscribe List-Subscribe: Jim -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= There's no place like 127.0.0.1 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= JimD Central FL, USA, Earth, Sol -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] Upgrade problem with perl-cleaner

Hi, I really have very little problem with my Gentoo system, but today on an upgrade I received the following message related to perl-cleaner: !!! Digest verification Failed: !!! /usr/portage/distfiles/perl-cleaner-1.03.tar.gz !!! Readon: Filesize does not match recorded size I'm sorry to bother

[gentoo-user] subscribe

subscribe -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] net-nntp/klibido

Ryan Tandy wrote: > JimD wrote: >> By the way, do you know if Gentoo considers an ebuild with an -rX on the >> end to be newer? For example which would emerge choose: >> >> sys-devel/gcc-3.4.6 >> or >> sys-devel/gcc-3.4.6-r1 > > s/Gentoo/portage ;) Ahh, yes, I had a brain freeze. > Yay, random

Re: [gentoo-user] net-nntp/klibido

Ryan Tandy wrote: > JimD wrote: >> If the above is not doable, does anyone know of a good binary news >> reader for Linux? > > What's wrong with Thunderbird? For binary news groups? I could give it a shot. However, Thunderbird sucks up tons of memory for text-only news groups with a few hundred

Re: [gentoo-user] net-nntp/klibido

JimD wrote: If the above is not doable, does anyone know of a good binary news reader for Linux? What's wrong with Thunderbird? GrabIt is simple, fast and stable. Though it is closed source and only runs on WinXP which doesn't help me now :-( Wine ;) -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] net-nntp/klibido

JimD wrote: By the way, do you know if Gentoo considers an ebuild with an -rX on the end to be newer? For example which would emerge choose: sys-devel/gcc-3.4.6 or sys-devel/gcc-3.4.6-r1 s/Gentoo/portage ;) Yes, it does. Revision bumps are generally to correct a bug or typo in an ebuild, o

[gentoo-user] net-nntp/klibido

Has anyone gotten this to compile with gcc 4.x? I just upgraded to gcc 4.1 and I also just installed kdelibs 3.5 (I am a gnome guy and want to give kde a look). The requirement page on the klibido site state gcc 3.x. Would I be able to emerge gcc 3.x and compile klibido with that? I compiled kd

Re: [gentoo-user] SSH hosed, only rubble remains

That does not work for ssh/scp sessions. I usually test $PS1 to tell if it's really a shell -- the variable does not even exist for an scp session, although .bashrc gets called. can you give us an example of what your .bashrc looks like? -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] net-nntp/klibido

Richard Fish wrote: > I would suggest to either use 3.4.x and rebuild all C++ programs with > that (using revdep-rebuild --library=libstdc++.so.6), or wait for the > above bug to get fixed. Rebuilding all C++ programs could include > openoffice.org, mozilla, and other long-compiling packages...

Re: [gentoo-user] Google Picasa for Linux!

Iain Buchanan wrote: > I'm not saying it _does_ these things, but where does it say it > _doesn't_? Hey, Google has a corporate slogan of do no evil. We can trust big corps right? :-) Jim -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= There's no place like 127.0.0.1 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= JimD Ce

Re: [gentoo-user] net-nntp/klibido

Richard Fish wrote: > I would suggest to either use 3.4.x and rebuild all C++ programs with > that (using revdep-rebuild --library=libstdc++.so.6), or wait for the > above bug to get fixed. Rebuilding all C++ programs could include > openoffice.org, mozilla, and other long-compiling packages...

Re: [gentoo-user] SSH hosed, only rubble remains

On 5/27/06, John Jolet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> That was the hint I needed.  It's /bin/bash, which reminded me I> just changed something> in .bashrc which outputs a message and does some other stuff which> must be> confusing scp.  In fact, I just confirmed that by commenting it > out.  Now scp

Re: [gentoo-user] Google Picasa for Linux!

On Sat, 2006-05-27 at 15:47 +0200, Gian Domeni Calgeer wrote: > Am Samstag 27 Mai 2006 13.54 schrieb Iain Buchanan: > > anyway, does it upload anything to google? I don't like the thought of > > a gmail-for-pictures sort of app on my PC. > > On http://picasa.google.com/linux/download.html they w

Re: [gentoo-user] net-nntp/klibido

On 5/27/06, JimD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Has anyone gotten this to compile with gcc 4.x? Doesn't look promising. I just tried it, and I get this bug: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133535 I just upgraded to gcc 4.1 and I also just installed kdelibs 3.5 (I am a gnome guy and want

Re: [gentoo-user] SSH hosed, only rubble remains

That was the hint I needed. It's /bin/bash, which reminded me I just changed something in .bashrc which outputs a message and does some other stuff which must be confusing scp. In fact, I just confirmed that by commenting it out. Now scp works too. So: PROBLEM SOLVED. Now I just have t

Re: [gentoo-user] SSH hosed, only rubble remains

On 5/27/6, John Jolet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okay, I set LogLevel=DEBUG3 and reloaded sshd, but I got no more> output than usual:> May 27 09:14:55 treat sshd[11739]: Received SIGHUP; restarting.> May 27 09:14:55 treat sshd[2352]: Server listening on 0.0.0.0 port 22.> May 27 09:15:31 treat ss

[gentoo-user] net-nntp/klibido

Has anyone gotten this to compile with gcc 4.x? I just upgraded to gcc 4.1 and I also just installed kdelibs 3.5 (I am a gnome guy and want to give kde a look). The requirement page on the klibido site state gcc 3.x. Would I be able to emerge gcc 3.x and compile klibido with that? I compiled kd

Re: [gentoo-user] Problems configuring VMWare

Martin Larsson wrote: > On 5/24/06, Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Well yes, he needs a -r, > > I've installed vmware-workstation-5.5.1.19175-r3. > But it seemed I had some old versions of vmware-files > in various locations. So I cleaned that up, and now I > can configure. > > But wh

Re: [gentoo-user] OT 0.0.0.0 security query

Le Samedi 27 Mai 2006 11:40, Dave S a écrit : > Hi all, > > This is a bit OT but I have a netgear router DG834 ADSL firewall router. I > have restricted my incoming services with ... > > Enable Service Name Action LAN Server IP address WAN Users Log > on bit torrent ALLOW always 192.168.0.5

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 4.1.1 Problems

Jason Weisberger wrote: > List, > > I figure upgrading to GCC 4.1.1 from 3.4.5 wouldn't be such a pain, > right? WRONG. So far I've had just about every problem under the > sun, mostly in the form of filesize errors which I wouldn't think > would be related to GCC, but then again: > > app-a

Re: [gentoo-user] Modules dependencies problem!

Without more info I can't be much help. But here's a pointer, just in case : The modules init script launches modules-update, which can be launched at the command line. The error you have is consistent (and, looking at the code of the scrip can only be caused by) modules-update failing. You shou

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 4.1.1 Problems

Saturday 27 May 2006 23:22 skrev Jason Weisberger: > I will be going on vacation for about a week, and when I get back I'll > try to do all this again, hell, maybe even from a fresh install.  I > hear the benefits are worth it. What benefits? -- Bo Andresen pgpt3NNfGxdh5.pgp Description: PGP s

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 4.1.1 Problems

On 5/27/06, Jason Weisberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've read a few things about 4.1.1 not playing well with GTK packages on the forums, however, and that still appears to be the case. I'll get exact error messages when I return and bring this thread up again. Cool. Hopefully any problems

Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrading to gcc 4.1: emerge -e world required?

Saturday 27 May 2006 19:58 skrev Alexander Skwar: > >> gcc update "Nothing needs to be done" Sure... How much did the > >> person who wrote this check? "Hello World!" worked, and that's it? What exactly do you intend to achieve by flaming the devs? > >> Sometimes this complete lack of QA is r

Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrading to gcc 4.1: emerge -e world required?

On 5/27/06, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: And also pardon me, when I'm annoyed because of too bold statements which turn out to be wrong. If it says "no problems expected", then that's what I expect. I don't expect to run into deep problems. And the GWN and upgrade doc clearly stated

Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrading to gcc 4.1: emerge -e world required?

On 5/27/06, Hemmann, Volker Armin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Saturday 27 May 2006 19:58, Alexander Skwar wrote: > Did you try to compile glib? No? Then I guess you've done no testing. if he does not have glib? To be fair, I did mention mozilla, so it is safe to assume that I have gtk and gl

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 4.1.1 Problems

List, I suppose that I just found it odd that it popped up after I switched to GCC 4.1.1. Maybe coincidence. I'll delete all my digest files and let them download again, because this is popping up on quite a few packages. Maybe a bad mirror. I will be going on vacation for about a week, and w

Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrading to gcc 4.1: emerge -e world required?

I don't know what 'upgrade guide' you have read, but: Now let's rebuild toolchain and then world so we will make use of the new compiler. Code Listing 2.2: Rebuilding system # emerge -eav system # emerge -eav world and glibc is part of the system. Which part of the upgrade guide did you

Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrading to gcc 4.1: emerge -e world required?

On 5/27/06, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stop using ~arch packages, or stop whining. No, I won't do neither. The GWN and the upgrade doc used to say, that an upgrade is (basically) riskless. Well I can't force you to do anything. You found a problem, reported a bug, and got th

Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrading to gcc 4.1: emerge -e world required?

Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: On Saturday 27 May 2006 19:58, Alexander Skwar wrote: Richard Fish wrote: > On 5/27/06, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> gcc update "Nothing needs to be done" Sure... How much did the >> person who wrote this check? "Hello World!" worked, and that's

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 4.1.1 Problems

On 5/27/06, Hemmann, Volker Armin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: so run ebuild blabla.ebuild digest wow, that is hard... Probably better to just delete the distfiles and let them be downloaded again though... -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] xdm is 'stopping' [SOLVED]

Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: >Saturday 27 May 2006 16:16 skrev Peter Kelly: > > >>That did it. I never knew about the 'zap' command. >>Anyhow, everything is 'started' again. >> >> > >You people really should read the Gentoo handbook. Not just the installation >related part but also part 2-4.

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 4.1.1 Problems

On 5/27/06, Jason Weisberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: List, I figure upgrading to GCC 4.1.1 from 3.4.5 wouldn't be such a pain, right? WRONG. So far I've had just about every problem under the sun, mostly in the form of filesize errors which I wouldn't think would be related to GCC, but

Re: [gentoo-user] xdm is 'stopping' [SOLVED]

Saturday 27 May 2006 16:16 skrev Peter Kelly: > That did it.  I never knew about the 'zap' command. > Anyhow, everything is 'started' again. You people really should read the Gentoo handbook. Not just the installation related part but also part 2-4. It's really good. E.g. the 'zap' command is do

Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrading to gcc 4.1: emerge -e world required?

On Saturday 27 May 2006 19:58, Alexander Skwar wrote: > Richard Fish wrote: > > On 5/27/06, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> gcc update "Nothing needs to be done" Sure... How much did the > >> person who wrote this check? "Hello World!" worked, and that's it? > >> > >> Sometimes

Re: [gentoo-user] xdm is 'stopping' [SOLVED]

Peter Kelly wrote: >On Saturday 27 May 2006 06:56, Iain Buchanan wrote: > > >>On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 20:14 -0500, Peter Kelly wrote: >> >> >>>Holas, >>> >>> >>> > > > >>>Everything *seems* to work fine, but then there's that silly 'stopping' >>>comment that doesn't google very well.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Now Know Why Portage Is So Slow

On 5/27/06, Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Saturday 27 May 2006 13:42 skrev Iain Buchanan: > I've heard that argument before, and I don't know why some people see > that behaviour - esearch only takes seconds for me... It's not the esearch binary versus the eix binary where there

Re: [gentoo-user] Google Picasa for Linux!

To clear this up, I will send the .tar.gz file to anyone who asks for it. Just beware: it's over 20 megs, so I'm going to have to slice it into many files so that you can re-assemble it. My email won't send over ten megs. But if you're having trouble, I'll send it. Just contact me (preferably

Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrading to gcc 4.1: emerge -e world required?

Richard Fish wrote: On 5/27/06, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: gcc update "Nothing needs to be done" Sure... How much did the person who wrote this check? "Hello World!" worked, and that's it? Sometimes this complete lack of QA is really pissing me off :( Stop using ~arch pack

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 4.1.1 Problems

On Saturday 27 May 2006 17:40, Jason Weisberger wrote: > List, > > I figure upgrading to GCC 4.1.1 from 3.4.5 wouldn't be such a pain, > right? WRONG. So far I've had just about every problem under the > sun, mostly in the form of filesize errors which I wouldn't think > would be related to G

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: libexpat / qt / kde

On 27 May 2006 14:00, Francesco Talamona wrote: > On Saturday 27 May 2006 14:47, Uwe Thiem wrote: > > That gives me a *huge* list of packages which would be rebuilt. Most > > of them are kde-3.5 stuff. Since I am upgrading from kde-3.5.1 to > > kde-3.5.2 in the same process, I am not interested in

Re: [gentoo-user] SSH hosed, only rubble remains

Okay, I set LogLevel=DEBUG3 and reloaded sshd, but I got no more output than usual: May 27 09:14:55 treat sshd[11739]: Received SIGHUP; restarting. May 27 09:14:55 treat sshd[2352]: Server listening on 0.0.0.0 port 22. May 27 09:15:31 treat sshd[2356]: Connection from 64.166.164.53 port 32776 Ma

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5

On Saturday 27 May 2006 17:01, fire-eyes wrote: > On Saturday 27 May 2006 10:41, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > > > True.  But why keep 3.4? > > > > because 3.5 has some bugs - and some people have less problems tolerate > > this bugs than others. > > I must agree here. I have been using the 3.5 eb

[gentoo-user] kreetingkard ebuild?

I did some googleing, and need a kreetingkard ebuild, anyone know if there are any around?? Mike -- Michael W. Holdeman Powered by Gentoo Linux www.gentoo.org | Kernel 2.6.15-ck2 | VMWare Workstation 5.5.1 vmware.com | Win4L

Re: [gentoo-user] Google Picasa for Linux!

Alexander Skwar wrote: > Well, fact is, that we can now get access to the page. And > I wonder, why JimD posted, after it's been discovered that > this "fact" is outdated (the post from Raymond Lewis and > the replies have been sent before JimD sent his reply). > > Alexander Skwar Dude, get over

Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrading to gcc 4.1: emerge -e world required?

On 5/27/06, Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: gcc update "Nothing needs to be done" Sure... How much did the person who wrote this check? "Hello World!" worked, and that's it? Sometimes this complete lack of QA is really pissing me off :( Stop using ~arch packages, or stop whining

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 4.1.1 Problems

On Sat, 27 May 2006 19:40:06 +0400, Jason Weisberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: app-admin/perl-cleaner These packages quit on me after telling me that the reported filesize by the ebuild wasn't equal to the downloaded filesize. This only happened with gcc-config 6 (4.1.1). When I switched b

Re: [gentoo-user] SSH hosed, only rubble remains

On 5/27/06, John Jolet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Password:> debug1: packet_send2: adding 32 (len 25 padlen 7 extra_pad 64)> debug2: input_userauth_info_req> debug2: input_userauth_info_req: num_prompts 0> debug1: packet_send2: adding 48 (len 10 padlen 6 extra_pad 64) > debug1: ssh-userauth2 succ

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 4.1.1 Problems

Alexander Skwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Jason Weisberger wrote: > > >I figure upgrading to GCC 4.1.1 from 3.4.5 wouldn't be such a pain, > >right? WRONG. > > Yes, very much so. See my "Upgrading to gcc 4.1: emerge -e world required?" > thread. Yea, since the soname was the same, I was under

Re: [gentoo-user] GCC 4.1.1 Problems

Jason Weisberger wrote: I figure upgrading to GCC 4.1.1 from 3.4.5 wouldn't be such a pain, right? WRONG. Yes, very much so. See my "Upgrading to gcc 4.1: emerge -e world required?" thread. These packages quit on me after telling me that the reported filesize by the ebuild wasn't equal to t

[gentoo-user] GCC 4.1.1 Problems

List, I figure upgrading to GCC 4.1.1 from 3.4.5 wouldn't be such a pain, right? WRONG. So far I've had just about every problem under the sun, mostly in the form of filesize errors which I wouldn't think would be related to GCC, but then again: app-admin/perl-cleaner x11-proto/xextproto x

Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrading to gcc 4.1: emerge -e world required?

Neil Bothwick wrote: On Sat, 27 May 2006 07:54:44 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > and KDE continued to > work. Not here. I've had a few strange errors since posting that. Like one from Konqueror when trying to load a page, which then loaded perfectly on the next try. > Maybe i've not run o

[gentoo-user] Re: Modules dependencies problem!

Oh, just in case...I'm running Gentoo 2005.1 for AMD64 On 5/27/06, El TuZa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi guys, I'm having a problem during initialization. It happens that 50% of the time that I boot my desktop, when "Calculating module dependencies" says "Failed to load modules dependencies" (wi

[gentoo-user] Modules dependencies problem!

Hi guys, I'm having a problem during initialization. It happens that 50% of the time that I boot my desktop, when "Calculating module dependencies" says "Failed to load modules dependencies" (with the corresponding red exclamation marks) and when it gets to the loggin message it never loads kdm, a

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5

On Saturday 27 May 2006 10:41, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > > True.  But why keep 3.4? > > because 3.5 has some bugs - and some people have less problems tolerate > this bugs than others. I must agree here. I have been using the 3.5 ebuilds since they entered the tree many months) on two system

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5

On Saturday 27 May 2006 08:03, Anthony E. Caudel wrote: > Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > > On Saturday 27 May 2006 06:04, Anthony E. Caudel wrote: > >>I see that KDE 3.5 finally made it out of testing. I plan to upgrade to > >>it but since it is slotted, I'll have to unmerge 3.4 first. No problem

Re: [gentoo-user] xdm is 'stopping' [SOLVED]

On Saturday 27 May 2006 06:56, Iain Buchanan wrote: > On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 20:14 -0500, Peter Kelly wrote: > > Holas, > > > > > > Everything *seems* to work fine, but then there's that silly 'stopping' > > comment that doesn't google very well. Anyone seen this, or have an > > idea? > > dunno, m

Re: [gentoo-user] 3 Problems

On Sat, 2006-05-27 at 14:00 +0100, Paul Stear wrote: > Hi all, > For some time now I have been getting errors on boot. > 1.This happens a number of times:- > udev-event [1777]:find_free_number: %e is deprecated, will be removed and is > unlikely to work correctly. Don't use it > What does this

Re: [gentoo-user] Google Picasa for Linux!

Am Samstag 27 Mai 2006 13.54 schrieb Iain Buchanan: > On Sat, 2006-05-27 at 08:56 +0200, Kristian Poul Herkild wrote: > > Alexander Skwar wrote: > > > JimD wrote: > > >> Ptitjack wrote: > > >>> 404 Error Not found ! > > > > It works now, but not in the beginning. > > haha. maybe it was gentoo-use

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Now Know Why Portage Is So Slow

Saturday 27 May 2006 13:42 skrev Iain Buchanan: > I've heard that argument before, and I don't know why some people see > that behaviour - esearch only takes seconds for me... It's not the esearch binary versus the eix binary where there is a big difference. It's eupdatedb which takes a very long

Re: [gentoo-user] mozilla-firefox-1.0.8 \w xorg-x11-6.8.2-r7 problem

On Sat, 2006-05-27 at 03:45 +0200, Matthias Langer wrote: > On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 17:04 -0700, Steven Susbauer wrote: > > > > On Sat, 27 May 2006, Alexander Kirillov wrote: > > > > > > > > > >recently my sister descovered a strange and serious bug with > > > > > > > >mozilla-firefox-1.0.8 in comb

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Now Know Why Portage Is So Slow

Iain Buchanan wrote: On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 08:25 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: Also, unless this have changed dramatically, eix's database update is *much* faster than that of esearch - seconds vs. minutes. I've heard that argument before, and I don't know why some people see that behaviour - e

[gentoo-user] 3 Problems

Hi all, For some time now I have been getting errors on boot. 1. This happens a number of times:- udev-event [1777]:find_free_number: %e is deprecated, will be removed and is unlikely to work correctly. Don't use it What does this mean and how do I fix it? 1. etc/modules.devfs not automa

[gentoo-user] Re: libexpat / qt / kde

On Saturday 27 May 2006 14:47, Uwe Thiem wrote: > That gives me a *huge* list of packages which would be rebuilt. Most > of them are kde-3.5 stuff. Since I am upgrading from kde-3.5.1 to > kde-3.5.2 in the same process, I am not interested in rebuilding the > old kde-3.5.1 stuff because it will be

[gentoo-user] libexpat / qt / kde

Hi folks, after an "emerge ---sync" and during an "emerge --update world", qt-3.3.6 doesn't compile anymore because it can't find libexpat.so.0. So I did an "emerge --oneshot expat" which tells me at the end that I should do a "revdep-rebuild --library libexpat.so.0". That gives me a *huge* li

Re: [gentoo-user] SSH hosed, only rubble remains

Password: debug1: packet_send2: adding 32 (len 25 padlen 7 extra_pad 64) debug2: input_userauth_info_req debug2: input_userauth_info_req: num_prompts 0 debug1: packet_send2: adding 48 (len 10 padlen 6 extra_pad 64) debug1: ssh-userauth2 successful: method keyboard-interactive debug3: clear hostkey

Re: [gentoo-user] xdm is 'stopping'

On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 20:14 -0500, Peter Kelly wrote: > Holas, > > Two days ago I updated the nvidia drivers, so I killed gdm and restarted xdm > to reload the newer modules. > > Problem is, it looks like xdm never restarted. > > root ~ $ /etc/init.d/xdm status > * status: stopping > > root

Re: [gentoo-user] Google Picasa for Linux!

On Sat, 2006-05-27 at 08:56 +0200, Kristian Poul Herkild wrote: > Alexander Skwar wrote: > > JimD wrote: > >> Ptitjack wrote: > >> > >>> 404 Error Not found ! > >>> > It works now, but not in the beginning. haha. maybe it was gentoo-user-ed (although I doubt there are enough readers here to floo

Re: [gentoo-user] VOIP solution for dump terminals?

On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 17:11 +0800, Zhang Weiwu wrote: > Hello. In an office we helped set up, there are a lot of X terminals for the > clerks. (These X terminals are the old computers from school's lab, > installed simple Gentoo Linux only to start X). Now they need VIOP, is it > possible? I mean,

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Now Know Why Portage Is So Slow

On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 08:25 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: > Also, unless this have changed dramatically, eix's database update is > *much* faster than that of esearch - seconds vs. minutes. I've heard that argument before, and I don't know why some people see that behaviour - esearch only takes sec

Re: [gentoo-user] Now Know Why Portage Is So Slow

On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 20:23 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Fri, 26 May 2006 10:02:25 -0700, Lord Sauron wrote: > > > > you should try the ~x86 version of portage which has many > > > improvements: $ echo "sys-apps/portage ~x86" > > > >> /etc/portage/package.use $ emerge portage > > > > Just a q

Re: [gentoo-user] QT slotting and non-portage apps

=== On Saturday 27 May 2006 14:40, Neil Bothwick wrote: === On Sat, 27 May 2006 13:55:38 +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote: > It isn't a secret, some apps don't take place inside the protage :-) > And some of them use QT3 with 'configure && make && make install' way. > Now I have (at ~x86) slot

Re: [gentoo-user] Problems configuring VMWare

On 5/24/06, Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Well yes, he needs a -r, I've installed vmware-workstation-5.5.1.19175-r3. But it seemed I had some old versions of vmware-files in various locations. So I cleaned that up, and now I can configure. But when I attempt to actually *run* it, I g

Re: [gentoo-user] QT slotting and non-portage apps

On Sat, 27 May 2006 13:55:38 +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote: > It isn't a secret, some apps don't take place inside the protage :-) > And some of them use QT3 with 'configure && make && make install' way. > Now I have (at ~x86) slotted QT installd - both 3 and 4 versions, > and autotools-building ha

[gentoo-user] QT slotting and non-portage apps

Hi! It isn't a secret, some apps don't take place inside the protage :-) And some of them use QT3 with 'configure && make && make install' way. Now I have (at ~x86) slotted QT installd - both 3 and 4 versions, and autotools-building has these ot those errors. Is there legal/Gentoo way to make the

[gentoo-user] OT 0.0.0.0 security query

Hi all, This is a bit OT but I have a netgear router DG834 ADSL firewall router. I have restricted my incoming services with ... Enable Service Name Action LAN Server IP address WAN Users Log on bit torrent ALLOW always 192.168.0.5 Any Always Default Yes Any BLOCK always Any A

Re: [gentoo-user] /var/tmp, no longer symlink to /tmp?

On Sat, 27 May 2006 01:22:31 -0700 (PDT), Steven Susbauer wrote: > Did I at some point screw up my system, or is /var/tmp no longer a link > to /tmp by default anymore? I know that it used to, as I even thought > it was odd that they didn't just use /tmp directly. They are not linked by default,

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Now Know Why Portage Is So Slow

Steven Susbauer wrote: Long story short, sudo echo "emerge --sync 1>/dev/null 2>&1" > /etc/cron.daily/portsync, sudo chmod 755 /etc/cron.daily/portsync How will this update either the eix or the esearch databases? Alexander Skwar -- I haven't been married in over six years, but we had sexual

Re: [gentoo-user] /var/tmp, no longer symlink to /tmp?

Steven Susbauer wrote: Did I at some point screw up my system, or is /var/tmp no longer a link to /tmp by default anymore? On my systems, /var/tmp has never been a link to /tmp. Alexander Skwar -- And now for something completely the same. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrading to gcc 4.1: emerge -e world required?

Steven Susbauer wrote: On Sat, 27 May 2006, Neil Bothwick wrote: Absolutely. The GWN posting was clearly optimistic :( Way too much. On the bug report, it's been announced, that the upgrade doc will be rewritten, so that people are warned. Why would an emerge -e world be required? Becaus

[gentoo-user] /var/tmp, no longer symlink to /tmp?

Did I at some point screw up my system, or is /var/tmp no longer a link to /tmp by default anymore? I know that it used to, as I even thought it was odd that they didn't just use /tmp directly. I've relinked, and now I'm just curious if there was a real reason for this not to have been there anym

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Now Know Why Portage Is So Slow

On Sat, 27 May 2006, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sat, 27 May 2006 08:16:02 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > > > > but eix-sync is still longer than esync (8 to 5) ;) > > > > Nah, it's 5 to 5, so eix-sync is NOT longer than esync... > > I really think you guys should read this page :) > > http://www

Re: [gentoo-user] What is causing x11-terms/xterm to be dragged in?

On Fri, 26 May 2006 20:05:34 -0700 (PDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > $ grep USE /etc/make.conf | grep -v "^#" > USE="berkdb innodb" > > I have no /usr/portage/package.use > > $ grep USE /etc/make.profile/make.defaults > USE="alsa apm arts avi bitmap-fonts cups eds emboss encode fortran > fooma

Re: [gentoo-user] What is causing x11-terms/xterm to be dragged in?

On Fri, 26 May 2006 23:07:41 -0500, Anthony E. Caudel wrote: > Curious that "X" should be in make.defaults. Does that mean that the > devs think that everyone wants X loaded? No, that's why it is called make.defaults and has several files which will override it. -- Neil Bothwick Anyone able

Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrading to gcc 4.1: emerge -e world required?

On Sat, 27 May 2006, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sat, 27 May 2006 07:54:44 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: > > > > and KDE continued to > > > work. > > > > Not here. > > I've had a few strange errors since posting that. Like one from Konqueror > when trying to load a page, which then loaded perfectl

Re: [gentoo-user] Google Picasa for Linux!

On Sat, 27 May 2006, Alexander Skwar wrote: > Kristian Poul Herkild wrote: > > > > > It works now, but not in the beginning. > > Okay. > > > When the first news arrived, I couldn't get access to it unless through > > a translated page. You can see the same problems being discussed at OSN. > > Th

  1   2   >