On Wednesday 09 May 2007 23.37.58 Neil Bothwick wrote:
Recent is never recent enough. I used to think daily backups were fine,
until a failure at 5pm cost me a day's work :(
Once an hour synced across 3 computers, with a master copy made daily :)
--
Naga
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Hi all,
this one's a bit OT...
I have a linux server and multiple (10) windows xp clients. So far,
each windows client has it's own user and password info stored on it.
This slowly becomes harder to manage as a user has to have an account on
each machine, and has to change passwords in multiple
On Wednesday 09 May 2007, maxim wexler wrote:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 May 9 08:25
cdrom - hdc
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 May 9 08:25
cdrom1 - hdd
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 3 May 9 08:25 cdrw
- hdc
appear since loading ide-generic.ko
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~
On Thursday 10 May 2007, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 23:49:45 darren kirby wrote:
I do have a separate /usr, but do not mount it readonly, as I
--sync enough to make remounting it daily rather annoying.
Congratulations! You've just explained why PORTDIR defaulting to
On Thursday 10 May 2007, Neil Bothwick wrote:
3) Better still,
http://gentoo-wiki.com/TIP_Speeding_up_portage#Make_A_Sparse_File_to_
create_portage_in
I never understood why portage on a sparse file is beneficial. Mine is
on a small reiser logival volume mounted with option tail. It's just
Hello Naga,
Recent is never recent enough. I used to think daily backups were
fine, until a failure at 5pm cost me a day's work :(
Once an hour synced across 3 computers, with a master copy made daily :)
Two separate backup methods, run alternate hours (in case one of them
corrupts the
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 23:08, Elias Probst wrote:
Oups, you're right.
emerge fontconfig did the trick for me! Ugly rendering of Konsole and
password bullets has gone.
Glad this helped. :)
The only thing I noticed is that when I launch Konqueror as root it reverts to
small fonts.
--
Hello Alan McKinnon,
I never understood why portage on a sparse file is beneficial. Mine is
on a small reiser logival volume mounted with option tail. It's just
big enough to hold portage with 10-15% free space (the tree doesn't
expand that much over time).
It is faster. If I were going
-Original Message-
From: Iain Buchanan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 May 2007 09:13
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] [OT] linux authentication server
Hi all,
this one's a bit OT...
I have a linux server and multiple (10) windows xp clients. So
Hi Michael,
Am Mittwoch, 09. Mai 2007, 15:21:52 -0500 schrieb Michael Sullivan:
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 20:50 +0200, Bertram Scharpf wrote:
Am Dienstag, 08. Mai 2007, 14:52:15 -0500 schrieb Michael Sullivan:
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 20:33 +0200, Bertram Scharpf wrote:
If you don't want to
Francisco Rivas wrote:
Hi Johannes and every friend of the list :D.
Johannes two things:
1.- I think (i guess) it's better install the 8.36.5 ati drivers, because
the 8.32.5 ati drivers is too bugs and is better have the actual
driver, you
can download from the ati page and put on the
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Alan McKinnon,
I never understood why portage on a sparse file is beneficial. Mine is
on a small reiser logival volume mounted with option tail. It's just
big enough to hold portage with 10-15% free space (the tree doesn't
expand that much over
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 23:43 -0400, JD wrote:
Thanks, Alex. I had to run 'installer' from commandline. Went with the
recommended setup; got an Exception that the dialog says this is a Bad
Thing ...
Um, that's really no nice thing. You could try filing a bug or the like.
Better yet: search
On Thu, 10 May 2007 16:42:48 +0930
Iain Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
this one's a bit OT...
I have a linux server and multiple (10) windows xp clients. So far,
each windows client has it's own user and password info stored on it.
This slowly becomes harder to manage as a
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 10:45 +0200, Johannes Skov Frandsen wrote:
I should then be using version 8.28.8 of the driver.
I have tried coping both the 8.28.8 and the 8.36.5 to my dist folder and
tried to run emerge:
emerge -va ati-drivers
but it only suggests the 8.32.5 version, which as
On Thu, 10 May 2007 10:41:04 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
It is faster.
Hm. I don't understand. Why is portage in a sparse file of, let's say,
400m, with reiserfs and notail mounted, faster, then a real partition
of 400m with reiserfs and notail?
No idea, but I tried it when I
Am Donnerstag, 10. Mai 2007 schrieb ext Daniel Iliev:
On Thu, 10 May 2007 16:42:48 +0930
Iain Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
this one's a bit OT...
I have a linux server and multiple (10) windows xp clients. So far,
each windows client has it's own user and password info
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2007 10:41:04 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hm. I don't understand. Why is portage in a sparse file of,
let's say, 400m, with reiserfs and notail mounted, faster, then
a real partition of 400m with reiserfs and notail?
No idea, but I tried it when I
Aleksandar L. Dimitrov wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 10:45 +0200, Johannes Skov Frandsen wrote:
I should then be using version 8.28.8 of the driver.
I have tried coping both the 8.28.8 and the 8.36.5 to my dist folder and
tried to run emerge:
emerge -va ati-drivers
but it only
On Thu, 10 May 2007 12:11:34 +0200, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
No idea, but I tried it when I encountered that page and portage
operations were measurably faster.
That might well be just the transfer effect: you went from an old
fragmented file system to a fresh unfragmented one.
I
Hi,
Some days ago I upgraded my kernel from gentoo sources 2.6.20-r5 to
2.6.21.
After this, gnome-power-manager could not sense the power source. It
shows always AC connector in, even it is running from battery.
Acpi shows me the fact, is it running from battery, but gnome power
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 12:24 +0200, Johannes Skov Frandsen wrote:
Aleksandar L. Dimitrov wrote:
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 10:45 +0200, Johannes Skov Frandsen wrote:
I should then be using version 8.28.8 of the driver.
I have tried coping both the 8.28.8 and the 8.36.5 to my dist folder
Hi,
Some days ago I upgraded my kernel from gentoo sources 2.6.20-r5 to
2.6.21.
After this, gnome-power-manager could not sense the power source. It
shows always AC connector in, even it is running from battery.
Acpi shows me the fact, is it running from battery, but gnome power
manager
Is it possible to get nvidia binary drivers working for an onboard
GeForce 6100 nForce 400? lspci doesn't recognise it:
00:0d.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation Unknown device
03d2 (rev a2)
I saw it listed in _one_ nvidia-drivers package (on the nvidia website)
as supported, but it
On Wed, 09 May 2007 22:24:47 +0200
Stefan Schweizer wrote:
Hi,
I have added a new fixed ebuild to the tree now :)
Firest of all, thanks.
Now, with zd1211-85.ebuild, I'm getting new error:
/usr/src/linux
/var/tmp/portage/net-wireless/zd1211-85/work/zd1211-driver-r85
On Thursday 10 May 2007, Arnau Bria wrote:
n Wed, 09 May 2007 22:24:47 +0200
Stefan Schweizer wrote:
Hi,
I have added a new fixed ebuild to the tree now :)
Firest of all, thanks.
Now, with zd1211-85.ebuild, I'm getting new error:
Output in English please. Few people here can understand
On Thu, 10 May 2007 14:03:35 +0200
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 10 May 2007, Arnau Bria wrote:
n Wed, 09 May 2007 22:24:47 +0200
Stefan Schweizer wrote:
Hi,
I have added a new fixed ebuild to the tree now :)
Firest of all, thanks.
Now, with zd1211-85.ebuild, I'm getting
Good day,
What kernel have you?, what version of xorg?
:D
On 5/10/07, Iain Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to get nvidia binary drivers working for an onboard
GeForce 6100 nForce 400? lspci doesn't recognise it:
00:0d.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation Unknown
On Thursday 10 May 2007, Arnau Bria wrote:
CC [M]
/var/tmp/portage/net-wireless/zd1211-85/work/zd1211-driver-r85/src/z
dusb.o CC [M]
/var/tmp/portage/net-wireless/zd1211-85/work/zd1211-driver-r85/src/z
d1211.o
/var/tmp/portage/net-wireless/zd1211-85/work/zd1211-driver-r85/src/zd
Hi all friends, I really like this situations because we learn so much...I
have to thank you to all for this experience...
Well we got a lot of work to do for help Johannes.
You fell confortable installing the ati-drivers manually?, if your aswer is
Yes, then:
1.- Disable all support for ati
Sorry,my English is poor:-)
I have a ATI with 9250 ,so I have to add x11-drivers/ati-drivers-8.29.1
to /etc/portage/package.mask,ati-driver-8.28.8-r1 (not ati-driver-8.28.8)
and the kernel with 2.6.19 is well,but the 2.6.20 cant.
xorg 7.2 isnt support R200 (inclue 9200 9250)seriers.Dont update
On Thursday 10 May 2007 09:29:54 Mick wrote:
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 23:08, Elias Probst wrote:
Oups, you're right.
emerge fontconfig did the trick for me! Ugly rendering of Konsole and
password bullets has gone.
Glad this helped. :)
The only thing I noticed is that when I launch
hmh, works fine for me on 2.6.21.
You might want to consider using gentoo-sources-2.6.20-r8 because that is
the latest stable one.
Best regards,
Stefan
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Thu, 10 May 2007 16:48:04 +0200
Stefan Schweizer wrote:
hmh, works fine for me on 2.6.21.
You might want to consider using gentoo-sources-2.6.20-r8 because
that is the latest stable one.
Mmmm... I use suspend ones...
Linux pataki 2.6.19-suspend2-r3 #1 PREEMPT Fri Mar 9 02:17:29 CET 2007
--- Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 09 May 2007, maxim wexler wrote:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 rootroot 3 May 9 08:25
cdrom - hdc
lrwxrwxrwx 1 rootroot 3 May 9 08:25
cdrom1 - hdd
lrwxrwxrwx 1 rootroot 3 May 9 08:25
cdrw
- hdc
On Tue, 8 May 2007 21:34:47 +0100 (WEST)
Jorge Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Michael Sullivan wrote:
I need a procmail recipe that will allow all mails marked as spam
to be delivered to a dovecot maildir-style folder called Suspect
located in
I think I sent this question from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] about an hour ago, but as I
have not received it back again at either this
address, or espersunited.com and as I don't seem to
have sent any mail from espersunited.com since April,
I'll send this again. In my exim.conf file, I'm a
little
Stuart Howard stuart.g.howard at gmail.com writes:
All versions of the ATI driver are blocking xorg-server 1.3 at the
moment so you are not going to get around that one easily.
If you look at the --tree to find out what package is asking for the
upgrade of xorg-server and then mask that?
Hi group,
By way of addendum to my earlier post on udev rules
and my CD and DVD drives, /dev/hdc and /dev/hdd.
At first the drives were'nt found then modprobeing
ide-generic.ko fixed that. But the links under /dev to
the drives were being mysteriously incremented. So
ide-generic was compiled
quoth the Michael Sullivan:
I think I sent this question from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] about an hour ago, but as I
have not received it back again at either this
address, or espersunited.com and as I don't seem to
have sent any mail from espersunited.com since April,
I'll send this again. In my
JD jdangler at atlantic.net writes:
Just got a D420 laptop and wanted to setup gentoo...
Booted from cd, got to the OpenGL start, and X fails ...
Are you using 2007.0 based installation media? It was just
release:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/releng
hth
James
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
I thought this question would be quiet common but I've been unable to get an
answer googling and looking through howtos. Actually there are some links in
an old thread on forums.gentoo.org but its target seems to have moved.
Anyway, how do I install packages in .rpm or .deb without messing
On Thursday 10 May 2007 14:58, Elias Probst wrote:
On Thursday 10 May 2007 09:29:54 Mick wrote:
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 23:08, Elias Probst wrote:
Oups, you're right.
emerge fontconfig did the trick for me! Ugly rendering of Konsole and
password bullets has gone.
Glad this helped.
quoth the Florian Philipp:
Hi!
I thought this question would be quiet common but I've been unable to get
an answer googling and looking through howtos. Actually there are some
links in an old thread on forums.gentoo.org but its target seems to have
moved.
Anyway, how do I install packages
On Thursday 10 May 2007 21:06:13 Florian Philipp wrote:
I thought this question would be quiet common but I've been unable to get
an answer googling and looking through howtos. Actually there are some
links in an old thread on forums.gentoo.org but its target seems to have
moved.
Well, you
darren kirby ha scritto:
Well, you can install RPM...
# emerge -p rpm
You could then, presumably, install the RPM, though I have not ever tried
this:
# rpm -i foopackage.i386.rpm
I fear this way Portage would not be aware of the package being
installed. Am I wrong?
m.
--
[EMAIL
James wrote:
Are you using 2007.0 based installation media? It was just
release:
I'm sure it would be lovely - if it didn't segfault on half of my
machines. :( It loads the gui but nothing of consequence will run,
including the install programs. The 2007.0 livecd images are definitely
not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
VIA Chrome 9 HC IGP could anyone tell me, what driver should I
use for it ?
For the moment: xf86-video-vesa.
Support for your type of Chrome integrated graphics chip is being
worked on:
http://wiki.openchrome.org/tikiwiki/tiki-index.php?page=HardwareCaveats
If you
Am Donnerstag 10 Mai 2007 21:53 schrieb Bo Ørsted Andresen:
On Thursday 10 May 2007 21:06:13 Florian Philipp wrote:
I thought this question would be quiet common but I've been unable to get
an answer googling and looking through howtos. Actually there are some
links in an old thread on
quoth the b.n.:
darren kirby ha scritto:
Well, you can install RPM...
# emerge -p rpm
You could then, presumably, install the RPM, though I have not ever tried
this:
# rpm -i foopackage.i386.rpm
I fear this way Portage would not be aware of the package being
installed. Am I
On Friday 11 May 2007 00:12:43 b.n. wrote:
# rpm -i foopackage.i386.rpm
I fear this way Portage would not be aware of the package being
installed. Am I wrong?
No, you are correct.
--
Bo Andresen
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Thursday 10 May 2007 22:16:59 Florian Philipp wrote:
I thought this question would be quiet common but I've been unable to
get an answer googling and looking through howtos. Actually there are
some links in an old thread on forums.gentoo.org but its target seems
to have moved.
thanks
- Original Message -
From: Benno Schulenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 11:12 PM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Onboard video
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
VIA Chrome 9 HC IGP could anyone tell me, what driver should I
use for it ?
quoth the b.n.:
darren kirby ha scritto:
Well, you can install RPM...
# emerge -p rpm
You could then, presumably, install the RPM, though I have not ever
tried this:
# rpm -i foopackage.i386.rpm
I fear this way Portage would not be aware of the package being
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 22:29 +0200, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
On Thursday 10 May 2007 22:16:59 Florian Philipp wrote:
1. This page provides no way to handle a binary-only rpm, just sources.
Yet, sources are no problem since they should be available as a tarball or
in portage itself while
Am Donnerstag 10 Mai 2007 22:29 schrieb Bo Ørsted Andresen:
On Thursday 10 May 2007 22:16:59 Florian Philipp wrote:
I thought this question would be quiet common but I've been unable to
get an answer googling and looking through howtos. Actually there are
some links in an old thread
On Thu, 10 May 2007 22:36:41 +0200, Florian Philipp wrote:
Maybe I should formulate another question: Where is the big difference
between a binary ebuild and a binary rpm / deb and why is it so hard to
convert them?
The only real difference is the packaging method. The extra information
On Thu, 10 May 2007 11:34:46 +0100
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2007 12:11:34 +0200, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
No idea, but I tried it when I encountered that page and portage
operations were measurably faster.
That might well be just the transfer effect:
On Wed, 2 May 2007 14:40:13 +0200
Jan Seeger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah yes sorry there. Then I cannot help you, since I have no experience
using netboot/pxe. Sorry
Greetings Jan Seeger
Well, dave, I look to be one of the few who have done this. I think I
can give you a hand.
1. I can
El Thu, 10 May 2007 22:36:41 +0200
Florian Philipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Maybe I should formulate another question: Where is the big
difference between a binary ebuild and a binary rpm / deb and why is
it so hard to convert them?
The difference is that Gentoo is not RPM based. Could it
On Thu, 10 May 2007 08:50:34 -0700 (PDT)
maxim wexler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 09 May 2007, maxim wexler wrote:
lrwxrwxrwx 1 rootroot 3 May 9 08:25
cdrom - hdc
lrwxrwxrwx 1 rootroot 3 May 9 08:25
On Thursday 10 May 2007 22:36:41 Florian Philipp wrote:
Maybe I should formulate another question: Where is the big difference
between a binary ebuild and a binary rpm / deb and why is it so hard to
convert them?
Gentoo is a source based distro. Usually in Gentoo binary packages are placed
in
quoth the Florian Philipp:
Maybe I should formulate another question: Where is the big difference
between a binary ebuild and a binary rpm / deb and why is it so hard to
convert them?
Another thought:
Unless I've missed it, you've not mentioned *what* it is you have an RPM for.
Have you
On Thu, 10 May 2007 22:12:43 +
b.n. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
darren kirby ha scritto:
Well, you can install RPM...
# emerge -p rpm
You could then, presumably, install the RPM, though I have not ever
tried this:
# rpm -i foopackage.i386.rpm
I fear this way Portage would
On Thu, 10 May 2007 21:10:25 +0930
Iain Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to get nvidia binary drivers working for an onboard
GeForce 6100 nForce 400? lspci doesn't recognise it:
00:0d.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation Unknown device
03d2 (rev a2)
Unless the
Hey all. I updated my home server today, and while looking through
the resultant emails from portage, I find this message from the python
emerge
| Subject: package dev-lang/python-2.4.3-r4 merged on zeus.spore.ath.cx
| with notice
| Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 09:45:15 -0500
|
| WARN: postrm
On 5/10/07, Iain Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to get nvidia binary drivers working for an onboard
GeForce 6100 nForce 400? lspci doesn't recognise it:
00:0d.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation Unknown device
03d2 (rev a2)
I saw it listed in _one_ nvidia-drivers
Yes, I believe so. I got the iso's (both stage 3 and minimal 2007) from
gentoo.org . Is there a more recent release that would have the drivers for
the 945 ?
-Original Message-
From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 3:01 PM
To:
On Friday 11 May 2007 00:53:38 Dan Farrell wrote:
Hey all. I updated my home server today, and while looking through
the resultant emails from portage, I find this message from the python
emerge
| Subject: package dev-lang/python-2.4.3-r4 merged on zeus.spore.ath.cx
[SNIP]
| WARN: postrm
|
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:53:38PM -0500, Dan Farrell wrote:
Hey all. I updated my home server today, and while looking through
the resultant emails from portage, I find this message from the python
emerge
| Subject: package dev-lang/python-2.4.3-r4 merged on zeus.spore.ath.cx
|
Hi,
On Thu, 10 May 2007 22:50:42 +0200
Florian Philipp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since I can install an rpm after emerging rpm itself, there is no need to
convert it. All I have to do is to make portage aware of this package. Of
course I would have to take care of dependencies myself and let
On Thu, 2007-05-10 at 17:27 +, James wrote:
Stuart Howard stuart.g.howard at gmail.com writes:
All versions of the ATI driver are blocking xorg-server 1.3 at the
moment so you are not going to get around that one easily.
If you look at the --tree to find out what package is asking
My guess is, you upgraded the kernel and fell into
the commonly
experienced PATA driver burn -- there's two driver
sets now, an
experimental one and the old ones, and you have to
make sure to get the
right one for your configuration.
What I did was write a 10-local.rules file following
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mick wrote:
Is this the way it is supposed to look?
Your attached picture looks fine to me, but I'm not sure what you were
comparing it to...
R
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
Am Donnerstag, 10. Mai 2007 schrieb ext Florian Philipp:
Anyway, how do I install packages in .rpm or .deb without messing up
portage?
Write an ebuild for it. portage uses rpm packages just like tar.gz.
See http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103406 for an example ebuild that
uses a
On Fri, 11 May 2007 01:36:03 +0400, Dan Farrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2007 11:34:46 +0100
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 10 May 2007 12:11:34 +0200, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
No idea, but I tried it when I encountered that page and portage
operations were
76 matches
Mail list logo
