Re: [gentoo-user] This Connection is Untrusted: WAS: Firefox-10.0.1 fails to compile on x86

2012-02-23 Thread Florian Philipp
Am 24.02.2012 04:01, schrieb Adam Carter: >>> In all of those cases above, if you allowed the connection it would >>> still be SSL encrypted. You'd be protected against packet sniffers but >>> not against man-in-the-middle attack. > > And the reason someone will man-in-the-middle you, is so they c

[gentoo-user] Re: No more FLASH on Linux ?

2012-02-23 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 24/02/12 07:02, pk wrote: On 2012-02-24 05:15, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: user can watch. Flash on the other hand guarantees web designers that a PC user can watch their videos. Having a guarantee that something works is a very powerful incentive; you do not abandon something that works. It'

Re: [gentoo-user] Midori and Flash

2012-02-23 Thread Willie WY Wong
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 03:32:16AM +0100, Penguin Lover Alex Schuster squawked: > Now I'd also like to use Midori, as a lightweight browser for using > Google+. The reason is that when I open Google+ in Firefox, I am > also logged in at Google when I using other tabs with Youtube or other > Google

Re: [gentoo-user] portage updates

2012-02-23 Thread Willie WY Wong
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 01:36:00AM +, Penguin Lover Peter Humphrey squawked: > On Thursday 23 February 2012 11:48:59 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > I prefer to update portage first, just in case it co-coincides with some > > update to the tree > > What does "co-coincides" mean? I know that vario

Re: [gentoo-user] portage updates

2012-02-23 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 01:36:00 + Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Thursday 23 February 2012 11:48:59 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > I prefer to update portage first, just in case it co-coincides with > > some update to the tree > > What does "co-coincides" mean? I know that various versions of > Engli

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: No more FLASH on Linux ?

2012-02-23 Thread pk
On 2012-02-24 05:15, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > user can watch. Flash on the other hand guarantees web designers that a > PC user can watch their videos. Having a guarantee that something works > is a very powerful incentive; you do not abandon something that works. It's only guaranteed if flash

Re: [gentoo-user] A few suggestions for emerge world via cron

2012-02-23 Thread Pandu Poluan
On Feb 24, 2012 7:18 AM, "Harry Putnam" wrote: > > First my setup: > > Fairly basic (newish) install (noX) in a Virtual Box vm on windows7 host > > I'd like to hear some of the ways you all keep up with syncing and > update world. > > Of course the basic call with cron is clear enough: > > eix-sy

[gentoo-user] Re: No more FLASH on Linux ?

2012-02-23 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 24/02/12 05:22, Philip Webb wrote: 120223 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 23/02/12 22:49, James wrote: Adobe has announce no more Flash on Linux. The real news is "no more Flash on Linux in 5 years". Isn't HTML 5 due to replace Flash long before then ? It's not compatible with Flash, so no;

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: No more FLASH on Linux ?

2012-02-23 Thread Philip Webb
120223 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 23/02/12 22:49, James wrote: >> Adobe has announce no more Flash on Linux. > The real news is "no more Flash on Linux in 5 years". Isn't HTML 5 due to replace Flash long before then ? -- ,,

[gentoo-user] Re: Firefox-10.0.1 fails to compile on x86

2012-02-23 Thread »Q«
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:43:11 -0600 Paul Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Willie WY Wong > wrote: > > Actually, why is it that upstream does not provide 64bit binaries? > > (It always bothers me to see my wife's Windows 7 machines running a > > copy of firefox marked, in parenthe

Re: [gentoo-user] This Connection is Untrusted: WAS: Firefox-10.0.1 fails to compile on x86

2012-02-23 Thread Adam Carter
>> In all of those cases above, if you allowed the connection it would >> still be SSL encrypted. You'd be protected against packet sniffers but >> not against man-in-the-middle attack. And the reason someone will man-in-the-middle you, is so they can sniff your traffic and get passwords or other

[gentoo-user] favorite smartctl test?

2012-02-23 Thread Grant
I'm trying to figure out how far gone an old Maxtor HD of mine is. It does have S.M.A.R.T. support. Is there a favorite smartctl command for making this determination? 'smartctl -a /dev/sda' says: SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED and: ATA Error Count: 116 Is a self-te

[gentoo-user] Midori and Flash

2012-02-23 Thread Alex Schuster
Hi there! I am using all kinds of web browsers. Firefox for sites I always want to have open. Konqueror when I start a browser from scratch to look something up. Chromium is also running, Mainly because I had trouble with Firefox opening one window on another desktop. Now I'd also like to use Mid

Re: [gentoo-user] [Solved] KDE Replace Kwin with something else

2012-02-23 Thread Ignas Anikevicius
On 24/02/12 02:01, Alex Schuster wrote: I find metacity.desktop and openbox.desktop in /usr/share/apps/ksmserver/windowmanagers/, so I guess you have to find awesome.desktop, and put it there. Or create such a file yourself like suggestend in the link above. Thank you very much. Copying to this

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE Replace Kwin with something else

2012-02-23 Thread Alex Schuster
Ignas Anikevicius writes: > I was wondering if anybody knows what USE flag should I enable in order > to have the option to change the default WM in KDE settings to something > else. I want to run Awesome WM on top of KDE and currently I can not do > it from the KDE System Settings. This has noth

Re: [gentoo-user] portage updates

2012-02-23 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Thursday 23 February 2012 11:48:59 Alan McKinnon wrote: > I prefer to update portage first, just in case it co-coincides with some > update to the tree What does "co-coincides" mean? I know that various versions of English exist out there, but this one has me foxed. -- Rgds Peter

Re: [gentoo-user] This Connection is Untrusted: WAS: Firefox-10.0.1 fails to compile on x86

2012-02-23 Thread Mark Knecht
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Paul Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Mark Knecht wrote: >> What is it about my systems wherein every one of these https links >> case my systems to barf with a "This Connection is Untrusted" message. >> If I remove the 's' then things work fine.

[gentoo-user] Re: Firefox-10.0.1 fails to compile on x86

2012-02-23 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 24/02/12 02:34, Dale wrote: Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 23/02/12 22:11, Dale wrote: Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 23/02/12 12:44, Mick wrote: On Thursday 23 Feb 2012 10:22:40 Willie WY Wong wrote: The irony is that older boxen which would benefit most from building from source are constrain

[gentoo-user] Re: Firefox-10.0.1 fails to compile on x86

2012-02-23 Thread Dale
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 23/02/12 22:11, Dale wrote: >> Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >>> On 23/02/12 12:44, Mick wrote: On Thursday 23 Feb 2012 10:22:40 Willie WY Wong wrote: The irony is that older boxen which would benefit most from building from source are constrained i

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE Replace Kwin with something else

2012-02-23 Thread Mick
On Thursday 23 Feb 2012 21:54:07 Ignas Anikevicius wrote: > Hello, > > I was wondering if anybody knows what USE flag should I enable in order > to have the option to change the default WM in KDE settings to something > else. I want to run Awesome WM on top of KDE and currently I can not do > it f

Re: [gentoo-user] A few suggestions for emerge world via cron

2012-02-23 Thread Paul Hartman
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Harry Putnam wrote: > First my setup: > > Fairly basic (newish) install (noX) in a Virtual Box vm on windows7 host > > I'd like to hear some of the ways you all keep up with syncing and > update world. I personally run it all manually and never schedule it to run

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: dog - man's best friend.

2012-02-23 Thread Paul Hartman
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Harry Putnam wrote: > Kevin Monceaux writes: > >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 08:42:00PM +, Alan Mackenzie wrote: >> >>> (a) using less, and have it take just 10 screen lines; (b) using cat etc., >>> and have the interesting part scroll away. >> >> (c) use less -F

[gentoo-user] A few suggestions for emerge world via cron

2012-02-23 Thread Harry Putnam
First my setup: Fairly basic (newish) install (noX) in a Virtual Box vm on windows7 host I'd like to hear some of the ways you all keep up with syncing and update world. Of course the basic call with cron is clear enough: eix-sync emerge -vuD world But what I mean is how you handle thing

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: dog - man's best friend.

2012-02-23 Thread Willie WY Wong
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 06:24:29PM -0500, Penguin Lover Harry Putnam squawked: > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 08:42:00PM +, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > > > >> (a) using less, and have it take just 10 screen lines; (b) using cat etc., > >> and have the interesting part scroll away. > > > > (c) use l

Re: [gentoo-user] This Connection is Untrusted: WAS: Firefox-10.0.1 fails to compile on x86

2012-02-23 Thread Willie WY Wong
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 02:59:31PM -0800, Penguin Lover Mark Knecht squawked: > > They're working on it... They actually have started generating 64-bit > > nightly builds for Windows and Linux: > > https://nightly.mozilla.org/ > > What is it about my systems wherein every one of these https links

Re: [gentoo-user] This Connection is Untrusted: WAS: Firefox-10.0.1 fails to compile on x86

2012-02-23 Thread Paul Hartman
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Mark Knecht wrote: > What is it about my systems wherein every one of these https links > case my systems to barf with a "This Connection is Untrusted" message. > If I remove the 's' then things work fine. https encompasses two basic functions: encryption and trus

[gentoo-user] Re: dog - man's best friend.

2012-02-23 Thread Harry Putnam
Kevin Monceaux writes: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 08:42:00PM +, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > >> (a) using less, and have it take just 10 screen lines; (b) using cat etc., >> and have the interesting part scroll away. > > (c) use less -F and less will automatically exit if the entire file can fit

[gentoo-user] Re: This Connection is Untrusted: WAS: Firefox-10.0.1 fails to compile on x86

2012-02-23 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 24/02/12 00:59, Mark Knecht wrote: On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Paul Hartman wrote: On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Willie WY Wong wrote: Actually, why is it that upstream does not provide 64bit binaries? (It always bothers me to see my wife's Windows 7 machines running a copy of fir

[gentoo-user] This Connection is Untrusted: WAS: Firefox-10.0.1 fails to compile on x86

2012-02-23 Thread Mark Knecht
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Paul Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Willie WY Wong > wrote: >> Actually, why is it that upstream does not provide 64bit binaries? (It >> always bothers me to see my wife's Windows 7 machines running a copy >> of firefox marked, in parenthesis,

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Firefox-10.0.1 fails to compile on x86

2012-02-23 Thread Paul Hartman
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Paul Hartman wrote: > (32-bit will work for > everyone, 64-bit won't) And of course by "everyone" I'm talking about Windows or Ubuntu users who download binaries from mozilla.org in the first place, not sophisticated pure-64-bit Gentoo users. ;)

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Firefox-10.0.1 fails to compile on x86

2012-02-23 Thread Paul Hartman
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Willie WY Wong wrote: > Actually, why is it that upstream does not provide 64bit binaries? (It > always bothers me to see my wife's Windows 7 machines running a copy > of firefox marked, in parenthesis, 32 bit.) They're working on it... They actually have started

Re: [gentoo-user] Setting Java VM for just one program

2012-02-23 Thread Willie WY Wong
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 09:26:56PM +0100, Penguin Lover András Csányi squawked: > On 23 February 2012 21:13, Willie WY Wong wrote: > > Hi list, > > > > Is there a way to set the Java VM based on program? > > > > For the most part I would like to keep icedtea-bin-7 as my system VM, > > but there is

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Firefox-10.0.1 fails to compile on x86

2012-02-23 Thread Willie WY Wong
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:43:47PM +0200, Penguin Lover Nikos Chantziaras squawked: > If you think it's worth the hassle, why not. Personally, the only > reason I would build from source on such a slow system is to get a > 64-bit build, since the -bin package seems to be 32-bit. That means the

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc fails and then succeeds - definitely a problem?

2012-02-23 Thread Michael Mol
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Grant wrote: >>> > Parallel builds are not deterministic so if the Makefile allows a race >>> > condition to develop it's pot luck whether you'll be hit with it or >>> > not >>> >>> I got sick of stuff like that so I run MAKEOPTS="-j1" on all of my >>> systems. >>

Re: [gentoo-user] dog - man's best friend.

2012-02-23 Thread Alan Mackenzie
Hi, Paul. On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 03:37:34PM -0600, Paul Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Paul Hartman > wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > >> I've finally been pushed over the edge.  I simply can't stand it any > >> longer.  The "it" in this cas

[gentoo-user] KDE Replace Kwin with something else

2012-02-23 Thread Ignas Anikevicius
Hello, I was wondering if anybody knows what USE flag should I enable in order to have the option to change the default WM in KDE settings to something else. I want to run Awesome WM on top of KDE and currently I can not do it from the KDE System Settings. I'd be very grateful if someone could h

Re: [gentoo-user] ebuild for a fee?

2012-02-23 Thread Michael Mol
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > On 02/17/2012 04:09 AM, Grant wrote: >> I'd like to pay to have an ebuild built.  Can anyone recommend a way >> to get in touch with a good person for the job? > > ebuild doesn't equal ebuild: packaging java is different to packaging > py

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Firefox-10.0.1 fails to compile on x86

2012-02-23 Thread Michael Mol
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 23/02/12 21:42, Michael Mol wrote: >> >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Nikos Chantziaras >>  wrote: >>> >>> On 23/02/12 12:44, Mick wrote: The irony is that older boxen which would benefit most from building from

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc fails and then succeeds - definitely a problem?

2012-02-23 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 11:46:03 -0800 Mark Knecht wrote: > > Whenever I get build failures with the load-adaptive MAKEOPTS and > > EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS, I check the build log to see if it's relatively > > obvious that something was depended upon before it was built. If > > so, I file a bug. > > > > H

Re: [gentoo-user] dog - man's best friend.

2012-02-23 Thread Paul Hartman
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Paul Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote: >> I've finally been pushed over the edge.  I simply can't stand it any >> longer.  The "it" in this case is viewing a file or process output and >> either: (a) using less, and have it ta

Re: [gentoo-user] dog - man's best friend.

2012-02-23 Thread Paul Hartman
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > I've finally been pushed over the edge.  I simply can't stand it any > longer.  The "it" in this case is viewing a file or process output and > either: (a) using less, and have it take just 10 screen lines; (b) using > cat etc., and have the

Re: [gentoo-user] "Invalid boot diskette" what do I do?

2012-02-23 Thread Grant
[snip] >> Things I would try: >> >> Go into BIOS and make sure settings are still proper (sometimes it can >> get wiped out and set to bad values) >> >> Make sure BIOS can see the HDD manufacturer and model number etc. >> >> If not, power off, re-seat the HDD cables and try again >> >> If yes, boot

Re: [gentoo-user] dog - man's best friend.

2012-02-23 Thread Kevin Monceaux
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 08:42:00PM +, Alan Mackenzie wrote: > (a) using less, and have it take just 10 screen lines; (b) using cat etc., > and have the interesting part scroll away. (c) use less -F and less will automatically exit if the entire file can fit on one screen. One can export LE

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc fails and then succeeds - definitely a problem?

2012-02-23 Thread Alex Schuster
Grant writes: > I have a 1200 watt Corsair power supply and my temps are very low even > during the stress test so I'm thinking bad (Corsair) RAM. I should > remove modules one at a time and re-test to narrow it down? This sounds just like the right thing to do. Well, if you have four RAM chips,

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc fails and then succeeds - definitely a problem?

2012-02-23 Thread Mark Knecht
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Grant wrote: > > mprime ran for about 1.5 hours until it found this: > > [Work thread Feb 23 13:04] FATAL ERROR: Rounding was 0.5, expected less than > 0.4 > [Work thread Feb 23 13:04] Hardware failure detected, consult stress.txt file. > [Work thread Feb 23 13:0

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc fails and then succeeds - definitely a problem?

2012-02-23 Thread Grant
>>> The gcc update just failed to compile on one of my systems with a >>> segfault, but then succeeded after trying again even though I didn't >>> change anything.  Does that indicate a hardware problem for sure? >>> Should I run memtester?  Any other tests to run?  Nothing in dmesg. >> >> Not defi

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc fails and then succeeds - definitely a problem?

2012-02-23 Thread Grant
>> > Parallel builds are not deterministic so if the Makefile allows a race >> > condition to develop it's pot luck whether you'll be hit with it or >> > not >> >> I got sick of stuff like that so I run MAKEOPTS="-j1" on all of my >> systems. > > If it were a frequent occurrence, there may be some

[gentoo-user] Re: No more FLASH on Linux ?

2012-02-23 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 23/02/12 22:49, James wrote: Adobe has announce no more Flash on Linux. What the the (gentoo) plan for those of us that want to still view websites that use FLASH from a gentoo workstation (besides using chrome)? What are the work arounds for web surfing without FLASH support? http://www.ph

Re: [gentoo-user] dog - man's best friend.

2012-02-23 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 20:42:00 +, Alan Mackenzie wrote: If the subject is true, why does your dog have no man page? > I've finally been pushed over the edge. I simply can't stand it any > longer. The "it" in this case is viewing a file or process output and > either: (a) using less, and have

[gentoo-user] Re: dog - man's best friend.

2012-02-23 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 23/02/12 22:42, Alan Mackenzie wrote: I've set the threshold between the two cases at 60 lines. If your screen is a different size, change the two obvious bits. You can use the $LINES env variable to get the height of the current terminal. Another way to get them is with the "tput" comman

[gentoo-user] No more FLASH on Linux ?

2012-02-23 Thread James
Adobe has announce no more Flash on Linux. What the the (gentoo) plan for those of us that want to still view websites that use FLASH from a gentoo workstation (besides using chrome)? What are the work arounds for web surfing without FLASH support? http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_it

[gentoo-user] Re: Firefox-10.0.1 fails to compile on x86

2012-02-23 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 23/02/12 22:24, Willie WY Wong wrote: On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 09:55:07PM +0200, Penguin Lover Nikos Chantziaras squawked: The PGO optimized build that Mozilla is shipping. You can also build with PGO from source, but that means building FF *twice* in a row (by enabling the "pgo" USE flag).

[gentoo-user] dog - man's best friend.

2012-02-23 Thread Alan Mackenzie
Hi, Gentoo! I've finally been pushed over the edge. I simply can't stand it any longer. The "it" in this case is viewing a file or process output and either: (a) using less, and have it take just 10 screen lines; (b) using cat etc., and have the interesting part scroll away. To solve this dilem

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc fails and then succeeds - definitely a problem?

2012-02-23 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 11:47:03 -0800, Grant wrote: > > Parallel builds are not deterministic so if the Makefile allows a race > > condition to develop it's pot luck whether you'll be hit with it or > > not > > I got sick of stuff like that so I run MAKEOPTS="-j1" on all of my > systems. If it we

Re: [gentoo-user] genkernel and busybox

2012-02-23 Thread András Csányi
On 23 February 2012 21:16, Sebastian Pipping wrote: > On 01/24/2012 10:37 AM, András Csányi wrote: >> Dear All, >> >> I would like to ask what should I do in this case? I would like to >> make a new kernel using genkernel but there is no 1.8.1 version of >> busybox and it's not available in portag

Re: [gentoo-user] Setting Java VM for just one program

2012-02-23 Thread András Csányi
On 23 February 2012 21:13, Willie WY Wong wrote: > Hi list, > > Is there a way to set the Java VM based on program? > > For the most part I would like to keep icedtea-bin-7 as my system VM, > but there is one program (jabref-2.6) which doesn't run well with > java-7, but works fine with icedtea-bi

[gentoo-user] Re: Firefox-10.0.1 fails to compile on x86

2012-02-23 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 23/02/12 22:11, Dale wrote: Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 23/02/12 12:44, Mick wrote: On Thursday 23 Feb 2012 10:22:40 Willie WY Wong wrote: The irony is that older boxen which would benefit most from building from source are constrained in resources to achieve this and have to resort to inst

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Firefox-10.0.1 fails to compile on x86

2012-02-23 Thread Willie WY Wong
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 09:55:07PM +0200, Penguin Lover Nikos Chantziaras squawked: > The PGO optimized build that Mozilla is shipping. You can also build > with PGO from source, but that means building FF *twice* in a row (by > enabling the "pgo" USE flag). I doubt that with the old laptop an

Re: [gentoo-user] genkernel and busybox

2012-02-23 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 01/24/2012 10:37 AM, András Csányi wrote: > Dear All, > > I would like to ask what should I do in this case? I would like to > make a new kernel using genkernel but there is no 1.8.1 version of > busybox and it's not available in portage. To be honest I don't want > to do a new kernel by hand d

Re: [gentoo-user] screen locker

2012-02-23 Thread Grant
>> [snip] >> > I've been using xautolock for years and years. What's good about it is you >> > can have any 'locker' you want. For now, I'm using feh in slideshow mode. >> > For another, you can specify another program as a 'killer' such as a >> > suspend >> > or hibernate script. However, for a t

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Firefox-10.0.1 fails to compile on x86

2012-02-23 Thread Dale
Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 23/02/12 12:44, Mick wrote: >> On Thursday 23 Feb 2012 10:22:40 Willie WY Wong wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 07:22:27PM -0500, Penguin Lover Philip Webb >> squawked: I compiled FF 10.0.1 on amd64 without any problems : it needed 3,61 GB disk space for

Re: [gentoo-user] Genkernel 3.4.24 broken?

2012-02-23 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 02/06/2012 02:20 PM, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote: > I was just compiling my kernel using genkernel, and it seems genkernel > 3.4.24 is broken. I have specified INSTALL=YES in /etc/genkernel.conf; > the installtion does not happen, instead awk throws an error saying > failed to read /var/tmp/genkern

[gentoo-user] Setting Java VM for just one program

2012-02-23 Thread Willie WY Wong
Hi list, Is there a way to set the Java VM based on program? For the most part I would like to keep icedtea-bin-7 as my system VM, but there is one program (jabref-2.6) which doesn't run well with java-7, but works fine with icedtea-bin-6. Is there a "Gentoo" way of setting this? Thanks,

Re: [gentoo-user] ebuild for a fee?

2012-02-23 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 02/17/2012 04:09 AM, Grant wrote: > I'd like to pay to have an ebuild built. Can anyone recommend a way > to get in touch with a good person for the job? ebuild doesn't equal ebuild: packaging java is different to packaging python software etc. find an existing ebuild similar to what you need

[gentoo-user] Re: Firefox-10.0.1 fails to compile on x86

2012-02-23 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 23/02/12 21:42, Michael Mol wrote: On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 23/02/12 12:44, Mick wrote: The irony is that older boxen which would benefit most from building from source are constrained in resources to achieve this and have to resort to installing bin pack

Re: [gentoo-user] screen locker

2012-02-23 Thread Marc Joliet
Am Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:10:45 -0800 schrieb Grant : > [snip] > > I've been using xautolock for years and years. What's good about it is you > > can have any 'locker' you want. For now, I'm using feh in slideshow mode. > > For another, you can specify another program as a 'killer' such as a suspend

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc fails and then succeeds - definitely a problem?

2012-02-23 Thread Grant
>> The gcc update just failed to compile on one of my systems with a >> segfault, but then succeeded after trying again even though I didn't >> change anything.  Does that indicate a hardware problem for sure? >> Should I run memtester?  Any other tests to run?  Nothing in dmesg. >> >> - Grant >> >

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc fails and then succeeds - definitely a problem?

2012-02-23 Thread Mark Knecht
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Michael Mol wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Mark Knecht wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Grant wrote: >>> The gcc update just failed to compile on one of my systems with a >>> segfault, but then succeeded after trying again even though I did

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Firefox-10.0.1 fails to compile on x86

2012-02-23 Thread Michael Mol
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 23/02/12 12:44, Mick wrote: >> >> On Thursday 23 Feb 2012 10:22:40 Willie WY Wong wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 07:22:27PM -0500, Penguin Lover Philip Webb >> >> squawked: I compiled FF 10.0.1 on amd64 without any pr

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc fails and then succeeds - definitely a problem?

2012-02-23 Thread Grant
>> The gcc update just failed to compile on one of my systems with a >> segfault, but then succeeded after trying again even though I didn't >> change anything.  Does that indicate a hardware problem for sure? >> Should I run memtester?  Any other tests to run?  Nothing in dmesg. > > Not definitive

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc fails and then succeeds - definitely a problem?

2012-02-23 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 11:17:54 -0800 Grant wrote: > The gcc update just failed to compile on one of my systems with a > segfault, but then succeeded after trying again even though I didn't > change anything. Does that indicate a hardware problem for sure? > Should I run memtester? Any other tests

[gentoo-user] Re: Firefox-10.0.1 fails to compile on x86

2012-02-23 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 23/02/12 12:44, Mick wrote: On Thursday 23 Feb 2012 10:22:40 Willie WY Wong wrote: On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 07:22:27PM -0500, Penguin Lover Philip Webb squawked: I compiled FF 10.0.1 on amd64 without any problems : it needed 3,61 GB disk space for the link stage & most/all of my 2 GB me

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc fails and then succeeds - definitely a problem?

2012-02-23 Thread Michael Mol
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Mark Knecht wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Grant wrote: >> The gcc update just failed to compile on one of my systems with a >> segfault, but then succeeded after trying again even though I didn't >> change anything.  Does that indicate a hardware prob

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc fails and then succeeds - definitely a problem?

2012-02-23 Thread Mark Knecht
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Grant wrote: > The gcc update just failed to compile on one of my systems with a > segfault, but then succeeded after trying again even though I didn't > change anything.  Does that indicate a hardware problem for sure? > Should I run memtester?  Any other tests t

[gentoo-user] Re: gcc fails and then succeeds - definitely a problem?

2012-02-23 Thread Heorhi Valakhanovich
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 11:17:54 -0800 Grant wrote: > The gcc update just failed to compile on one of my systems with a > segfault, but then succeeded after trying again even though I didn't > change anything. Does that indicate a hardware problem for sure? > Should I run memtester? Any other tests

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc fails and then succeeds - definitely a problem?

2012-02-23 Thread Michael Mol
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Grant wrote: > The gcc update just failed to compile on one of my systems with a > segfault, but then succeeded after trying again even though I didn't > change anything.  Does that indicate a hardware problem for sure? > Should I run memtester?  Any other tests to

[gentoo-user] gcc fails and then succeeds - definitely a problem?

2012-02-23 Thread Grant
The gcc update just failed to compile on one of my systems with a segfault, but then succeeded after trying again even though I didn't change anything. Does that indicate a hardware problem for sure? Should I run memtester? Any other tests to run? Nothing in dmesg. - Grant

Re: [gentoo-user] screen locker

2012-02-23 Thread Grant
[snip] > I've been using xautolock for years and years. What's good about it is you > can have any 'locker' you want. For now, I'm using feh in slideshow mode. > For another, you can specify another program as a 'killer' such as a suspend > or hibernate script. However, for a traditional ss, I have

[gentoo-user] acpi_fakekey in portage or alternatives

2012-02-23 Thread Ignas Anikevicius
Hello everybody, Does anybody know how to get acpi_fakekey on gentoo? Maybe there are ways to mimic the functionality via other methods? I wanted to make some more acpi keys working, but I do not know any other methods than acpi_fakekey. Thanks, Ignas

Re: [gentoo-user] portage updates

2012-02-23 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 15:07:46 +0100 Willie WY Wong wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 01:48:59PM +0200, Penguin Lover Alan McKinnon > squawked: > > I'm not worried about broken portage commits, I have > > FEATURES="buildsyspkg" enabled so as long as I have a working tar > > I'm good to go with any f

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: alternative to thunderbird?

2012-02-23 Thread Juan Diego Tascón
+1 for sup On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Wednesday 22 February 2012 20:14:05 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > >> You'd have to read "The Mythical ManMonth" to truly do it justice (it's a > >> really good book for developers btw). > > > > That book used to be required readi

Re: [gentoo-user] SOLVED gentoo-sources menuconfig feature/weirdness

2012-02-23 Thread Mark Knecht
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:16 AM, Coert Waagmeester wrote: > On 02/23/2012 01:08 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: >>> >>> Is there a way to import old config files with newer kernel sources? >>> I tried it once by simply copying .config into the newer src dir, but >>> I read somewhere that there could be

Re: [gentoo-user] portage updates

2012-02-23 Thread Willie WY Wong
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 01:48:59PM +0200, Penguin Lover Alan McKinnon squawked: > I'm not worried about broken portage commits, I have > FEATURES="buildsyspkg" enabled so as long as I have a working tar I'm > good to go with any fix. Wait... isn't portage itself no longer in the system set? W --

Re: [gentoo-user] Anybody have kdebluetooth working?

2012-02-23 Thread James Broadhead
On 23 February 2012 12:39, Robin Atwood wrote: > I have just tried to send a file from my phone to my laptop running KDE 4.8.0 > and it fails; the two devices never bind. When I set up the laptop it was > running KDE 4.6.3 and bluetooth worked fine. The BlueZ libraries have changed > substantially

[gentoo-user] Anybody have kdebluetooth working?

2012-02-23 Thread Robin Atwood
I have just tried to send a file from my phone to my laptop running KDE 4.8.0 and it fails; the two devices never bind. When I set up the laptop it was running KDE 4.6.3 and bluetooth worked fine. The BlueZ libraries have changed substantially since, I think. Using 'hcitool inq' works fine, it's

Re: [gentoo-user] SOLVED gentoo-sources menuconfig feature/weirdness

2012-02-23 Thread J. Roeleveld
On Thu, February 23, 2012 12:25 pm, Alan McKinnon wrote: > Just don't do what I did earlier: sit in Joburg and configure the > firewall on a Xen host in deepest darkest Africa where there's no > tarred roads to get to it. How did you get the server there? Flown it in? I've seen the roads in Afric

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Firefox-10.0.1 fails to compile on x86

2012-02-23 Thread Walter Dnes
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:44:36AM +, Mick wrote > I've only got something like 625M RAM and around 4G disk space (for > var/portage). I used 750M from that 4G for adding swap. Eventually FF > compiled fine. > > The irony is that older boxen which would benefit most from building from >

Re: [gentoo-user] portage updates

2012-02-23 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 11:24:17 + Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 13:16:01 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > > Historically, when an update to portage came available, portage > > would put it at the head of the list, build it first, then re-run > > emerge world command. > > > > I've s

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Firefox-10.0.1 fails to compile on x86

2012-02-23 Thread Philip Webb
120223 Willie WY Wong wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 07:22:27PM -0500, Penguin Lover Philip Webb squawked: >> I compiled FF 10.0.1 on amd64 without any problems : >> it needed 3,61 GB disk space for the link stage >> & most/all of my 2 GB memory. > Argh. 3.6 diskspace and 2G memory? > I guess

Re: [gentoo-user] SOLVED gentoo-sources menuconfig feature/weirdness

2012-02-23 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 13:16:41 +0200 Coert Waagmeester wrote: > > Not doing it this way means a very high likelyhood of the machine > > not booting with every single upgrade, plus the huge amount of work > > it takes to go through everything in menuconfig. > > indeed, especially when the server

Re: [gentoo-user] portage updates

2012-02-23 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 13:16:01 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > Historically, when an update to portage came available, portage would > put it at the head of the list, build it first, then re-run emerge > world command. > > I've seen lately that this no longer happens, portage updates are any > old pl

Re: [gentoo-user] SOLVED gentoo-sources menuconfig feature/weirdness

2012-02-23 Thread Coert Waagmeester
On 02/23/2012 01:08 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:48:35 +0200 Coert Waagmeester wrote: On 02/23/2012 11:17 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:51:43 +0200, Coert Waagmeester wrote: The only thing I can currently think of is maybe the kernel config files in /boo

[gentoo-user] portage updates

2012-02-23 Thread Alan McKinnon
Historically, when an update to portage came available, portage would put it at the head of the list, build it first, then re-run emerge world command. I've seen lately that this no longer happens, portage updates are any old place in the list just like all other packages. I'm wondering why this

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources menuconfig feature/weirdness

2012-02-23 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 12:48:35 +0200 Coert Waagmeester wrote: > On 02/23/2012 11:17 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:51:43 +0200, Coert Waagmeester wrote: > > > >> The only thing I can currently think of is maybe the kernel config > >> files in /boot? > > > > I'd say it's more li

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources menuconfig feature/weirdness

2012-02-23 Thread Coert Waagmeester
On 02/23/2012 11:17 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:51:43 +0200, Coert Waagmeester wrote: The only thing I can currently think of is maybe the kernel config files in /boot? I'd say it's more likely to be getting it from /proc/config.gz. But why start with a clean config each

Re: [gentoo-user] Overlays - mask everything except a specific package?

2012-02-23 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 11:19:03 +0100, Willie WY Wong wrote: > > The way I do this is to layman -a the overlay but not put it in > > make.conf. Then I symlink only the ebuilds I want to my local > > overlay. By symlinking instead of copying, I automatically get > > updates to that package. > > > N

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Firefox-10.0.1 fails to compile on x86

2012-02-23 Thread Mick
On Thursday 23 Feb 2012 10:22:40 Willie WY Wong wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 07:22:27PM -0500, Penguin Lover Philip Webb squawked: > > I compiled FF 10.0.1 on amd64 without any problems : > > it needed 3,61 GB disk space for the link stage > > & most/all of my 2 GB memory. > > Argh. 3.6 d

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Firefox-10.0.1 fails to compile on x86

2012-02-23 Thread Willie WY Wong
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 07:22:27PM -0500, Penguin Lover Philip Webb squawked: > I compiled FF 10.0.1 on amd64 without any problems : > it needed 3,61 GB disk space for the link stage > & most/all of my 2 GB memory. Argh. 3.6 diskspace and 2G memory? I guess it is finally getting to the point t

Re: [gentoo-user] Overlays - mask everything except a specific package?

2012-02-23 Thread Willie WY Wong
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 08:04:36PM +, Penguin Lover Neil Bothwick squawked: > > 2) Mask everything in an overlay except exactly what I actually want > > installed. > > The way I do this is to layman -a the overlay but not put it in > make.conf. Then I symlink only the ebuilds I want to my loca

Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo-sources menuconfig feature/weirdness

2012-02-23 Thread William Kenworthy
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 10:10 +0200, Coert Waagmeester wrote: > Hello all, > > Usually on gentoo when gentoo-sources gets updated, updating the kernel > went as follows: > > eselect kernel set {new kernel} > cd /usr/src/linux make mrproper > make menuconfig ... BillK

  1   2   >