On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 10:40:20 +0100
Arve Barsnes wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 09:28, Dale wrote:
> > Anyone see a way to fix this? It's getting old seeing this every
> > week when I try to do my updates and it may be blocking other
> > updates as well.
>
> Take a look at everything Jigme
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 12:41, Dale wrote:
> From what I've read so far, opencascade wants a older ffmpeg than
> everything else I have installed. It looks like opencascade needs to
> upgrade its code to work with newer ffmpeg. If I understand it correctly.
Correct, according to the gentoo
Arve Barsnes wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 09:28, Dale wrote:
>> Anyone see a way to fix this? It's getting old seeing this every week
>> when I try to do my updates and it may be blocking other updates as well.
> Take a look at everything Jigme wrote, but the easy fix seems to
> disable
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 at 09:28, Dale wrote:
> Anyone see a way to fix this? It's getting old seeing this every week
> when I try to do my updates and it may be blocking other updates as well.
Take a look at everything Jigme wrote, but the easy fix seems to
disable USE="ffmpeg" on the opencascade
On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 02:28:28 -0600
Dale wrote:
Trimming for brevity...
> Howdy,
>
> I either started a thread on this a while back or it was mentioned
> inside another thread. This has been popping up for months now.
> Either I have something set wrong or there is a problem in a ebuild or
>
On 04/12/2023 08:28, Dale wrote:
Oh, I see the little pointing up there but in Konsole, they never
point up to the right place. If it has a clue, I wouldn't be able to
get help from it. Also, I have some options in make.conf for emerge so
I'm taking this from emerge.log to show the
Howdy,
I either started a thread on this a while back or it was mentioned
inside another thread. This has been popping up for months now. Either
I have something set wrong or there is a problem in a ebuild or
something. I just don't know what. This is what I get. I'm having to
use this
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 10:22:49PM +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 19:10:17 +0100, Ashley Dixon wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, as per [3], Logitech C-series cameras (among others)
> > utilise a proprietary extension to the Motion-JPEG format, in which
> > H.264 data is attached
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 09:18:19PM +0100, Michael wrote:
> I don't have this webcam so I don't know if it will or won't play nicely with
> Linux, but at least ffmpeg seems to contain the requisite mjpeg codec:
>
> $ ffmpeg -hide_banner -codecs | grep mjpeg
> DEVIL. mjpegMotion
On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 19:10:17 +0100, Ashley Dixon wrote:
> Unfortunately, as per [3], Logitech C-series cameras (among others)
> utilise a proprietary extension to the Motion-JPEG format, in which
> H.264 data is attached to the various JPEG key and delta frames in the
> APP0 field [4], as
On Monday, 20 July 2020 19:10:17 BST Ashley Dixon wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> A while ago, I made the grave mistake of buying a Logitech C270 webcam
> [1], which initially seemed to be well-supported under Linux as a U.V.C.\
> camera [2]. As shown by the following (partial) output of `v4l2-ctl
Hi List,
A while ago, I made the grave mistake of buying a Logitech C270 webcam [1],
which initially seemed to be well-supported under Linux as a U.V.C.\ camera [2].
As shown by the following (partial) output of `v4l2-ctl --list-formats-ext`
suggests, the full 720p@30fps is only
On Sunday 19 Feb 2017 09:01:55 Gevisz wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 23:15:33 + Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 17:01:52 +0200, Gevisz wrote:
> > > > I think the problem is that you don't allow chromium to be rebuilt,
> > > > because all your blocking packages
On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:20:46 +0200 Alan McKinnon
wrote:
> On 18/02/2017 17:01, Gevisz wrote:
> > On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 13:02:22 +0100 Johannes Rosenberger
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 18.02.2017 12:21, gevisz wrote:
> >>> Yet, a week ago, I updated my
On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 23:15:33 + Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 17:01:52 +0200, Gevisz wrote:
>
> > > I think the problem is that you don't allow chromium to be rebuilt,
> > > because all your blocking packages depend on the installed slot
> > > (indicated by
On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 17:01:52 +0200, Gevisz wrote:
> > I think the problem is that you don't allow chromium to be rebuilt,
> > because all your blocking packages depend on the installed slot
> > (indicated by the '=') and need to be rebuilt in case ffmpeg is
> > upgraded. So, if you don't exclude
On 18/02/2017 17:01, Gevisz wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 13:02:22 +0100 Johannes Rosenberger
> wrote:
>
>> On 18.02.2017 12:21, gevisz wrote:
>>> Yet, a week ago, I updated my system without any problem but just now,
>>> trying to update my system,
>>> I have got the following
On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 13:02:22 +0100 Johannes Rosenberger wrote:
> On 18.02.2017 12:21, gevisz wrote:
> > Yet, a week ago, I updated my system without any problem but just now,
> > trying to update my system,
> > I have got the following error message:
> >
> > # emerge --update
It's not an ffmpeg and libav conflict:
# bzcat /usr/share/doc/ffmpeg-3.2.4/libav-merge.txt.bz2
CONTEXT
===
The FFmpeg project merges all the changes from the Libav project
(https://libav.org) since the origin of the fork (around 2011).
...
( and thanks God the feud is over! I know no
On 18.02.2017 12:21, gevisz wrote:
> Yet, a week ago, I updated my system without any problem but just now,
> trying to update my system,
> I have got the following error message:
>
> # emerge --update --deep --with-bdeps=y --newuse --backtrack=90 --ask
> world --verbose-conflicts --exclude
On 18 February 2017 at 12:21, gevisz wrote:
> # emerge --update --deep --with-bdeps=y --newuse --backtrack=90 --ask
> world --verbose-conflicts --exclude chromium
>
> [ebuild R] www-client/firefox-45.7.0 USE="(-gstreamer-0%)"
>
> What shall I do to solve this dependency
Yet, a week ago, I updated my system without any problem but just now,
trying to update my system,
I have got the following error message:
# emerge --update --deep --with-bdeps=y --newuse --backtrack=90 --ask
world --verbose-conflicts --exclude chromium
These are the packages that would be
On 05/10/2015 18:25, Stroller wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 4 October 2015, at 11:38 p.m., Alan McKinnon
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I see that the ffmpeg ebuild requires that mmxext is set if sse is set.
>>>
>>> Isn't mmxext amd-only?
>>
>> Definitely not. Intel designed mmx
>
> The
> On Sun, 4 October 2015, at 11:38 p.m., Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
>
>> I see that the ffmpeg ebuild requires that mmxext is set if sse is set.
>>
>> Isn't mmxext amd-only?
>
> Definitely not. Intel designed mmx
The ffmpeg has both "mmx" and "mmxext" USE flags -
Stroller wrote:
>> On Sun, 4 October 2015, at 11:38 p.m., Alan McKinnon
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I see that the ffmpeg ebuild requires that mmxext is set if sse is set.
>>>
>>> Isn't mmxext amd-only?
>> Definitely not. Intel designed mmx
> The ffmpeg has both "mmx" and "mmxext"
I see that the ffmpeg ebuild requires that mmxext is set if sse is set.
Isn't mmxext amd-only?
And is there really any value from micromanaging things like that in an
ebuild?
-JimC
--
James Cloos OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6
On 04/10/2015 22:49, James Cloos wrote:
> I see that the ffmpeg ebuild requires that mmxext is set if sse is set.
>
> Isn't mmxext amd-only?
Definitely not. Intel designed mmx
>
> And is there really any value from micromanaging things like that in an
> ebuild?
For ffmpeg? Yes. I imagine
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 12:38:15AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 04/10/2015 22:49, James Cloos wrote:
> >
> > And is there really any value from micromanaging things like that in an
> > ebuild?
>
> For ffmpeg? Yes.
Actually, I think modern versions of ffmpeg probably do not benefit as
much
On 04/12/2015 04:08 PM, Dale wrote:
There's been a discussion on the default switching back to ffmpeg on
-dev too. I think I read that correctly.
Yeah, I read that too - apparently they are going to a saner default,
i.e. USE=-libav.
Darnit, I just read this within the last week or so. Ah,
Alan Grimes wrote:
Mick wrote:
Thanks for pointing this out. My mistake. Apologies for that.
What I wasn't sure is if ffmpeg will be removed in the future and gentoo
will
end up following debian, et al.
Et al can go rot in hell. We use ffmpeg.
There's been a discussion on the default
On Sunday 12 Apr 2015 20:48:29 Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 22:30:43 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
grep libav /usr/portage/profiles/base/make.defaults
# Move the current Gentoo preference
Daniel Frey wrote:
On 04/12/2015 04:08 PM, Dale wrote:
There's been a discussion on the default switching back to ffmpeg on
-dev too. I think I read that correctly.
Yeah, I read that too - apparently they are going to a saner default,
i.e. USE=-libav.
Darnit, I just read this within the
2015-04-12 22:04 GMT+03:00 Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 9:58 PM, gevisz gev...@gmail.com wrote:
I used to convert dav to avi files with the following command
yet a year ago:
$ ffmpeg -i input.dav -vcodec libx264 -crf 24 output.avi
but now, while
On Sunday, April 12, 2015 10:23:32 PM gevisz wrote:
Thank you for your reply. I am aware of that change. But the news says:
Users who currently use libav (the Gentoo default) do not have to
perform any action since USE=libav is enabled by default.
So, I performed no actions.
And I
On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 15:27:17 -0400 Fernando Rodriguez
frodriguez.develo...@outlook.com wrote:
On Sunday, April 12, 2015 10:23:32 PM gevisz wrote:
Thank you for your reply. I am aware of that change. But the news says:
Users who currently use libav (the Gentoo default) do not have to
I used to convert dav to avi files with the following command
yet a year ago:
$ ffmpeg -i input.dav -vcodec libx264 -crf 24 output.avi
but now, while trying to use it, I get
bash: ffmpeg: command not found
What happened?
I still have virtual/ffmpeg package installed.
In my case it points to
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 9:58 PM, gevisz gev...@gmail.com wrote:
I used to convert dav to avi files with the following command
yet a year ago:
$ ffmpeg -i input.dav -vcodec libx264 -crf 24 output.avi
but now, while trying to use it, I get
bash: ffmpeg: command not found
What happened?
I
2015-04-12 12:58 GMT-06:00 gevisz gev...@gmail.com:
I used to convert dav to avi files with the following command
yet a year ago:
$ ffmpeg -i input.dav -vcodec libx264 -crf 24 output.avi
but now, while trying to use it, I get
bash: ffmpeg: command not found
What happened?
I still have
gevisz wrote:
I used to convert dav to avi files with the following command
yet a year ago:
$ ffmpeg -i input.dav -vcodec libx264 -crf 24 output.avi
but now, while trying to use it, I get
bash: ffmpeg: command not found
What happened?
I still have virtual/ffmpeg package installed.
In my
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 22:30:43 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
grep libav /usr/portage/profiles/base/make.defaults
# Move the current Gentoo preference (libav over ffmpeg)
USE=${USE} libav
If you want to use
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 10:23 PM, gevisz gev...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-04-12 22:04 GMT+03:00 Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com
:
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 9:58 PM, gevisz gev...@gmail.com wrote:
I used to convert dav to avi files with the following command
yet a year ago:
$
On Sun, 12 Apr 2015 22:30:43 +0300, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
grep libav /usr/portage/profiles/base/make.defaults
# Move the current Gentoo preference (libav over ffmpeg)
USE=${USE} libav
If you want to use ffmpeg instead of libav, It should be noted that the
users still need to enable
Mick wrote:
Thanks for pointing this out. My mistake. Apologies for that.
What I wasn't sure is if ffmpeg will be removed in the future and gentoo will
end up following debian, et al.
Et al can go rot in hell. We use ffmpeg.
--
IQ is a measure of how stupid you feel.
Powers are not
On 01/28/2015 12:07 AM, Jan Sever wrote:
I found the bugzilla:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=510340
So marking as SOLVED.
Thank you,
Jan Sever
P.S. Btw. poli in politics is from latin word polis = a place, not poly = many.
But it's a nice parallel.
Both a greek words, not latin.
On 01/27/2015 11:48 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 23:07:15 +0100 (CET), Jan Sever wrote:
P.S. Btw. poli in politics is from latin word polis = a place, not poly
= many. But it's a nice parallel.
Yes, and a tic is a nervous twitch, the blood sucking parasite is a tick,
but
On 01/28/2015 05:12 PM, Jan Sever wrote:
On 01/28/2015 1:24 AM, Thanasis wrote:
Both a greek words, not latin.
polis = city
poly = many/much
Thanks for correcting, I don't know why I had fixed in mind that polis is from
latin and poly from greek. But I thought polis should be a city and
On 01/28/2015 08:06 PM, Thanasis wrote:
On 01/28/2015 05:12 PM, Jan Sever wrote:
On 01/28/2015 1:24 AM, Thanasis wrote:
Both a greek words, not latin.
polis = city
poly = many/much
Thanks for correcting, I don't know why I had fixed in mind that polis is
from
latin and poly from greek.
Hi all,
when can we expect ffmpeg-2 to get stable? I found some information that it's
because of building issues but I found none. I looked into
/usr/portage/profiles/package.mask and there's no information about the
reason.
Thanks in advance for your answer,
Jan Sever
@lists.gentoo.org
Datum: 27. 1. 2015 15:15:51
Předmět: Re: [gentoo-user] ffmpeg-2: when getting stable?
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:41:48 +0100 (CET), Jan Sever wrote:
when can we expect ffmpeg-2 to get stable? I found some information
that it's because of building issues but I found none. I looked
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:41:48 +0100 (CET), Jan Sever wrote:
when can we expect ffmpeg-2 to get stable? I found some information
that it's because of building issues but I found none. I looked into
/usr/portage/profiles/package.mask and there's no information about the
reason.
package.mask
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 23:07:15 +0100 (CET), Jan Sever wrote:
P.S. Btw. poli in politics is from latin word polis = a place, not poly
= many. But it's a nice parallel.
Yes, and a tic is a nervous twitch, the blood sucking parasite is a tick,
but when did jokes have to be linguistically accurate?
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 02:43:17AM +0100, Penguin Lover Stroller squawked:
Best thing to do is to remove video/ffmpeg from world in favour of
virtual/ffmpeg so that Portage can work things out for itself.
Most likely (if you are on a desktop system), ffmpeg would be pulled
in as a dependency
On Thu, 17 May 2012 02:43:17 +0100
Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
On 16 May 2012, at 23:29, john wrote:
...
I have changed by use flag for ffmpeg to include theora. When i try
emerge I get the following
[blocks B ] media-video/ffmpeg (media-video/ffmpeg is
Hello,
I have changed by use flag for ffmpeg to include theora. When i try
emerge I get the following
[blocks B ] media-video/ffmpeg (media-video/ffmpeg is blocking
media-video/libav-0.8.2)
* Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be
* installed at the same time on
On Wed, 16 May 2012 22:29:11 +
john j...@jdm.myzen.co.uk wrote:
Hello,
I have changed by use flag for ffmpeg to include theora. When i try
emerge I get the following
[blocks B ] media-video/ffmpeg (media-video/ffmpeg is blocking
media-video/libav-0.8.2)
* Error: The above
On 16 May 2012, at 23:29, john wrote:
...
I have changed by use flag for ffmpeg to include theora. When i try
emerge I get the following
[blocks B ] media-video/ffmpeg (media-video/ffmpeg is blocking
media-video/libav-0.8.2)
* Error: The above package list contains packages which
Im trying to install kino but ffmpeg fails to compile:
Configuring source in
/var/tmp/portage/media-video/ffmpeg-0.7.8/work/ffmpeg-0.7.8 ...
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc is unable to create an executable file.
If x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc is a cross-compiler, use the --enable-cross-compile
option.
Configuring source in
/var/tmp/portage/media-video/ffmpeg-0.7.8/work/ffmpeg-0.7.8 ...
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc is unable to create an executable file.
If x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc is a cross-compiler, use the
--enable-cross-compile option.
Only do this if you know what cross compiling means.
C
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
Im trying to install kino but ffmpeg fails to compile:
Configuring source in
/var/tmp/portage/media-video/ffmpeg-0.7.8/work/ffmpeg-0.7.8 ...
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc is unable to create an executable file.
If
On 12/12/11 14:52, Michael Mol wrote:
[snip]
gcc-config $SOME_PROFILE
where SOME_PROFILE is something you'll find under /etc/env.d/gcc
After that, things worked fine for me again.
(I was in the process of building an email because I was going to ask
this list for help, and I figured out the
On 12/12/11 20:32, Michael Hampicke wrote:
Configuring source in
/var/tmp/portage/media-video/ffmpeg-0.7.8/work/ffmpeg-0.7.8 ...
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc is unable to create an executable file.
If x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc is a cross-compiler, use the
--enable-cross-compile option.
Only do this if
Joseph wrote:
On 12/12/11 14:52, Michael Mol wrote:
[snip]
gcc-config $SOME_PROFILE
where SOME_PROFILE is something you'll find under /etc/env.d/gcc
After that, things worked fine for me again.
(I was in the process of building an email because I was going to ask
this list for help, and I
On 12/12/11 14:29, Dale wrote:
[snip}
gcc-config -l
Then you can use gcc-config number you want to select to set it if it
is not set. If it is set, it should look like this:
[1] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.4.5
[2] x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-4.5.3 *
Note the little * on the end? That is the one that
No nothing crazy:
CFLAGS=-Os -pipe -mtune=i686
No you're right, that's nothing crazy.
Perhaps you could paste the complete build log of your failed merge to
pastebin[1].
Portage tells you where you can find that log file. The output of %
emerge --info might prove useful too.
[1]
Am Montag, 12. Dezember 2011, 13:28:39 schrieb Joseph:
On 12/12/11 20:32, Michael Hampicke wrote:
Configuring source in
/var/tmp/portage/media-video/ffmpeg-0.7.8/work/ffmpeg-0.7.8 ...
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc is unable to create an executable file.
If x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc is a
No nothing crazy:
CFLAGS=-Os -pipe -mtune=i686
i686? That's not amd64. You need something 64bit. Just use march=native
instead of mtune=i686.
Wait, what! I could swear I was reading march=native just a few minutes ago.
mtune=i686 on amd64 just doesn't seem right, but it should compile.
# echo | gcc -dM -E - -march=native
/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.5.3/cc1 -E -quiet -v -
-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -mtune=i686 -march=x86-64
Sorry, something went wrong while pasting this lines, here are the
correct ones:
# cc -mtune=i686 -E -v - /dev/null 21 | grep cc1
Some ffmpeg-using applications (e.g. mplayer) allow you to pass numbers
of threads (e.g. I use 6 on my Core-I7) to ffmpeg; others (e.g.
chromium) do not.
So I'm thinking of hardwiring a default threads number=6 into the ffmpeg
source code; recompiling.
Q: Has anyone done this; if so any
hi,
i am using gentoo x64, just have ffmpeg emerged, and successfully
emerged -u world. but when i ran ffmpeg -formats, i got a error
message saying that the libfaad.so.1 cannot be found. i check my
system, and i only have faad2 emerged. actually, the whole portage
tree does not have something
Xi Shen wrote:
hi,
i am using gentoo x64, just have ffmpeg emerged, and successfully
emerged -u world. but when i ran ffmpeg -formats, i got a error
message saying that the libfaad.so.1 cannot be found. i check my
system, and i only have faad2 emerged. actually, the whole portage
tree does
great, revdep-rebuild saved me. thanks ;)
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Xi Shen wrote:
hi,
i am using gentoo x64, just have ffmpeg emerged, and successfully
emerged -u world. but when i ran ffmpeg -formats, i got a error
message saying that the
Hi
I've used gentoo fo a couple of years and love it. Just now i use
mythbuntu, but i do miss gentoo. The problems with gentoo for me was a
few. I use the system as a desktop/fileserver/mythbackend. The problems
was mostly that nuvexport in portage is rather old, if i download it
from
Hello
Routine update to a system, leaves me with conflicting package
that want different versions of ffmpeg:
equery depends transcode
app-cdr/k3b-1.0.4 (encode? media-video/transcode)
equery depends xine-lib
kde-base/artsplugin-xine-3.5.9 (=media-libs/xine-lib-1.0)
media-sound/amarok-1.4.9.1
I'm trying to create a streaming server using ffmpeg, and I'm stuck, so
please advise if You can.
I've tested :
* *ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20080326*
* *ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20070616*
Both versions behave the same way. This is my emerge -pv ffmpeg
/media-video/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20080326 USE=a52 aac amr
On 3/27/06, Luigi Pinna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need it because I must do dvdauthoring... I solve it dropping the
ieee1394 flag, but I can't understand how I can use it...
Thanks for your helps,
I would suggest filing a bug report on bugs.gentoo.org if there isn't
one already.
Have you
Luigi Pinna wrote:
media-video/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20051216 +a52 +aac
(-altivec) -debug -doc -dts +encode +ieee1394 +imlib (-mmx) -network
+ogg -oss +sdl +test +theora +threads +truetype +v4l +vorbis +xvid
+zlib
All the dependencies are installed (if I use emerge -D ffmpeg is the
once package)
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alle 21:00, lunedì 27 marzo 2006, kashani ha scritto:
Luigi Pinna wrote:
media-video/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20051216 +a52 +aac
(-altivec) -debug -doc -dts +encode +ieee1394 +imlib (-mmx)
-network +ogg -oss +sdl +test +theora +threads +truetype +v4l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello!
I broke a disc and I had to reinstall my gentoo box in these days; in
the ffmpeg emerging, I found a lot of problem: no ebuild will complete
with success the process.
All the ebuild failed with with error:
from
On 27 March 2006 07:34, Luigi Pinna wrote:
Hello!
I broke a disc and I had to reinstall my gentoo box in these days; in
the ffmpeg emerging, I found a lot of problem: no ebuild will complete
with success the process.
All the ebuild failed with with error:
from
I am looking for an excellent ffmpeg front end/gui. It doesnt matter if
its a console or X based front end, as long as it supports as many
features of ffmpeg as possible for decoding/encoding processes. The
main purpose is to convert about 200 mp4's that I have into an SVCD/VCD
or mpg format
Ryan schreef:
I am looking for an excellent ffmpeg front end/gui. It doesnt matter if
its a console or X based front end, as long as it supports as many
features of ffmpeg as possible for decoding/encoding processes. The
main purpose is to convert about 200 mp4's that I have into an SVCD/VCD
I tried that yesterday, but it didnt appear to load the video. It sat
there trying to load, eating 99% of the CPU for about 20 mins. The file
is only 136MB's and I wouldnt expect it to take that long on an AMD 2800
w/1GB ram. It looked promising, but didnt seem to work. The Mplayer
info on the
82 matches
Mail list logo