On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 07:49:50 +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> I see. What I do is to embed the initramfs into the kernel image.
Ah yes, I'd forgotten about that option.
> Works
> fine as long as everything you need to setup / is compiled into the
> kernel statically. There's also one scenario wher
Am Montag, 9. Juli 2007 schrieb ext Neil Bothwick:
> On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 10:41:05 +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> > > The alternative would
> > > be to use a separate /boot and mess around with initramfs images to
> > > load / from LVM, which is extra hassle and another potential point of
> > > failu
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 10:41:05 +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> > The alternative would
> > be to use a separate /boot and mess around with initramfs images to
> > load / from LVM, which is extra hassle and another potential point of
> > failure.
>
> Want my scripts? ;-)
I'd be interested to see t
Am Montag, 9. Juli 2007 schrieb ext Neil Bothwick:
> Hello Dirk Heinrichs,
>
> > > [*] On machines already set up with a separate /boot. On new installs
> > > I don't bother with a separate /boot, there's no real advantage, so I
> > > tend to stick with / (including /boot) swap and an LVM partition
Hello Dirk Heinrichs,
> > [*] On machines already set up with a separate /boot. On new installs
> > I don't bother with a separate /boot, there's no real advantage, so I
> > tend to stick with / (including /boot) swap and an LVM partition for
> > everything else.
>
> What if you need to resize
Hello Dirk Heinrichs,
> > One physical partition used by LVM, but then several logical
> > partitions on that.
>
> Guess you wanted to write logical volumes. A logical partition is
> something different. It could mean that inside the big LVM partition,
> you would create logical partitions by u
Am Sonntag, 8. Juli 2007 schrieb ext Neil Bothwick:
> [*] On machines already set up with a separate /boot. On new installs I
> don't bother with a separate /boot, there's no real advantage, so I tend
> to stick with / (including /boot) swap and an LVM partition for
> everything else.
What if you
Am Montag, 9. Juli 2007 schrieb ext Neil Bothwick:
> Hello Allan Gottlieb,
>
> > > On new installs I tend to stick with / (including /boot) swap and an
> > > LVM partition for everything else.
> >
> > Just one partition? I have never used lvm, but thought that a
> > motivation was to be able to mo
Hello Allan Gottlieb,
> > On new installs I tend to stick with / (including /boot) swap and an
> > LVM partition for everything else.
>
> Just one partition? I have never used lvm, but thought that a
> motivation was to be able to move space from one partition to another.
One physical partiti
[Sorry for the previous post just quoting neil--finger slip]
At Sun, 08 Jul 2007 16:25:06 +0100 Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On new installs I tend to stick with / (including /boot) swap and an
> LVM partition for everything else.
Just one partition? I have never used lvm, but tho
At Sun, 08 Jul 2007 16:25:06 +0100 Neil Bothwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Jul 2007 09:03:47 -0500, Dan Farrell wrote:
>
>> > It's not an error really. You are not meant to mount /boot every
>> > time you boot - only when you want to change anything in it.
>>
>> There's nothing wr
On Sat, 7 Jul 2007 09:03:47 -0500, Dan Farrell wrote:
> > It's not an error really. You are not meant to mount /boot every
> > time you boot - only when you want to change anything in it.
>
> There's nothing wrong with having it mounted, only generally there's no
> reason to access it after bo
On 7/8/07, Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 07 July 2007 12:57, sain yan wrote:
> >Because you didn`t mount /boot?
>
> Yes! I find the erro in /etc/fstab
>
> /dev/sda7/boot ext3*noauto,*notime,noexec 0 0
It's not an error really. You are not meant to
only generally there's no reason to access it after boot
yes!!
==
I'm sorry for my poor english!!!
On Sat, 7 Jul 2007 13:38:22 +0100
Mick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 07 July 2007 12:57, sain yan wrote:
> > >Because you didn`t mount /boot?
> >
> > Yes! I find the erro in /etc/fstab
> >
> > /dev/sda7/boot ext3*noauto,*notime,noexec
> > 0 0
>
> It's not
On Saturday 07 July 2007 12:57, sain yan wrote:
> >Because you didn`t mount /boot?
>
> Yes! I find the erro in /etc/fstab
>
> /dev/sda7/boot ext3*noauto,*notime,noexec 0 0
It's not an error really. You are not meant to mount /boot every time you
boot - only when
Because you didn`t mount /boot?
Yes! I find the erro in /etc/fstab
/dev/sda7/boot ext3*noauto,*notime,noexec 0 0
THANKS EVERYBODY !!
--
==
I'm sorry for my poor english!!!
Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2007 schrieb ext sain yan:
> Hi
> On my gentoo box, Useing grub and it work fine!
> But I`m NOT find the file menu.lst in /etc and /boot,Why???
Because you didn't mount /boot?
> and I install another kernel , Then write the file "menu.lst" at
> /boot/grub/
On Thu, 5 Jul 2007 19:51:10 +0800
"sain yan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
> On my gentoo box, Useing grub and it work fine!
> But I`m NOT find the file menu.lst in /etc and /boot,Why???
>
>
> and I install another kernel , Then write the file "menu.lst" at
> /boot/grub/menu.
On 7/5/07, Dirk Heinrichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
As I wrote in my first answer to this thread (which somehow didn't make it
to the list, yet), the problem is (IMHO) with /boot not beeing mounted at
all.
Yes, if you followed the Gentoo install instructions closely /boot is
not mounted
Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2007 schrieb ext Dominik Żyła:
> 2007/7/5, Dirk Heinrichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2007 schrieb ext Dominik Żyła:
> > > Hi,
> > > [14:01] concubine:~ $ ll /boot/grub/menu.lst
> > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 gru 14 2005 /boot/grub/menu.lst ->
> > > grub.
2007/7/5, Dirk Heinrichs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2007 schrieb ext Dominik Żyła:
> Hi,
> [14:01] concubine:~ $ ll /boot/grub/menu.lst
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 gru 14 2005 /boot/grub/menu.lst -> grub.conf
> [14:01] concubine:~ $
So what?
Bye...
Dirk
--
Dirk Heinr
Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2007 schrieb ext Dominik Żyła:
> Hi,
> [14:01] concubine:~ $ ll /boot/grub/menu.lst
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 gru 14 2005 /boot/grub/menu.lst -> grub.conf
> [14:01] concubine:~ $
So what?
Bye...
Dirk
--
Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +49 (0)162 234 3408
Config
On Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2007, sain yan wrote:
> Hi
> On my gentoo box, Useing grub and it work fine!
> But I`m NOT find the file menu.lst in /etc and /boot,Why???
>
>
> and I install another kernel , Then write the file "menu.lst" at
> /boot/grub/menu.lst,
> But Grub DON`T re
On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 07:51:10PM +0800, sain yan wrote:
> On my gentoo box, Useing grub and it work fine!
>
> But I`m NOT find the file menu.lst in /etc and /boot,Why???
The file you want is stored as: /boot/grub/grub.conf on Gentoo systems.
You need to edit that file in order
Hi
On my gentoo box, Useing grub and it work fine!
But I`m NOT find the file menu.lst in /etc and /boot,Why???
and I install another kernel , Then write the file "menu.lst" at
/boot/grub/menu.lst,
But Grub DON`T read it when booting,Why??
anybody help me? tha
26 matches
Mail list logo
