You should start a new thread for your topic, instead of replying to an
existing thread to avoid messing up messages listed by thread.
Regarding your question: Cinnamon has a hardwired dependency on
networkmanager. I understand you can mask the networkmanager service or
remove it, but bits of
On Wed, 2022-05-11 at 20:22 -0400, Mansour Al Akeel wrote:
> I am trying to avoid installing rust and prevent emerge --update
> --deep world from installing it again.
> How to do this ?
>
1. Switch away from Mozilla products. Evolution is a great Thunderbird
alternative, and Epiphany is a passabl
On 12/05/2022 02:41, Mansour Al Akeel wrote:
And yes, the compile time is one of the factors in not wanting it on
my system. The second factor is a natural reaction toward feeling that
I am forced to have it.
Another reason is the growing collection of compilers and development
tools and their bu
On Wed, 2022-05-11 at 22:24 -0400, Mansour Al Akeel wrote:
> a choice would be to just go with firefox-bin if not rust-bin.
I went with rust-bin because lots of GTK programs (evince, gimp,
deluge) as well as some other miscellaneous utilities rely on librsvg
which requires rust.
So, since I need
Cal, like I said, gentoo has always been about choices. I am not
blaming anyone for anything. At the end of the day, it is open source,
and the work done by the community is highly appreciated.
I am sorry it was understood the other way around.
The frustration level grows when I have too many buil
On 5/11/22 18:41, Mansour Al Akeel wrote:
> Miles,
> Thank you for your response. The idea of "getting harder and harder"
> is hard to accept. Gentoo has always been about having choice> Firefox
> requires rust, but is there a way to disable this ?
> There must be another way to let the user decid
Thank you both Julien and Miles for your help.
I got the list I wanted, and I can go ahead with removing rust.
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 8:25 PM Julien Roy wrote:
>
> You need to remove all packages that depend on virtual/rust
> To see which ones do, run `emerge -pv --depclean virtual/rust`
>
> Jul
Miles,
Thank you for your response. The idea of "getting harder and harder"
is hard to accept. Gentoo has always been about having choices.
Firefox requires rust, but is there a way to disable this ?
There must be another way to let the user decide if they need it or not !
And yes, the compile tim
If your *reason* for wanting to remove rust is the compile time, bear
in mind there is also a rust-bin package these days. There are an
increasingly large number of major packages that have rust as a
dependency, so it's getting harder and harder to get away from.
Obviously anything from the mozill
You should send a mail to gentoo-user+unsubscr...@lists.gentoo.org in order to
unsubscribe from the list.
Regards,
Corentin “Nado” Pazdera
Am Wed, 13 Sep 2017 09:48:57 +0200
schrieb Raffaele Belardi :
> I might give Xfce a try. I did not find any definitive resource on the
> web stating that LXDE is dead. There are some recent commits on the
> sourceforge repo so it looks still alive (although not kickin').
I guess I wasn't quite up
On Tue, 2017-09-12 at 23:20 +0200, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Tue, 12 Sep 2017 17:55:22 +0200
> schrieb Raffaele Belardi :
>
> > 2. emerge -C gnome networkmanager
>
> You don't need to uninstall networkmanager except you want to
> uninstall
> it for some other reasons. It doesn't need gnome or syste
On Tue, 2017-09-12 at 18:31 +0200, Nils Freydank wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 12. September 2017, 17:55:22 CEST schrieb Raffaele
> Belardi:
> > After several months of Gnome3 I decided it is too heavy for my old
> > workstation and would like to go back to LXDE. The flow could be:
> >
> > 1. rebuild kern
On 09/12/2017 03:07 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Am Tue, 12 Sep 2017 17:28:40 -0400
> schrieb Mike Gilbert :
>
>> I would advise against this INSTALL_MASK setting. It is quite likely
>> to break things (like sys-fs/udev).
>
> No, it's not.
>
> I'd consider it a bug if systemd is not installed and
>
Am Tue, 12 Sep 2017 17:28:40 -0400
schrieb Mike Gilbert :
> I would advise against this INSTALL_MASK setting. It is quite likely
> to break things (like sys-fs/udev).
No, it's not.
I'd consider it a bug if systemd is not installed and
another package that doesn't depend on systemd relies on some
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Heiko Baums wrote:
> Just to be absolutely sure put this line into
> your /etc/portage/make.conf, too:
> INSTALL_MASK="/lib/systemd /lib32/systemd /lib64/systemd /usr/lib/systemd
> /usr/lib32/systemd /usr/lib64/systemd /etc/systemd"
I would advise against this IN
Am Tue, 12 Sep 2017 17:55:22 +0200
schrieb Raffaele Belardi :
> 2. emerge -C gnome networkmanager
You don't need to uninstall networkmanager except you want to uninstall
it for some other reasons. It doesn't need gnome or systemd.
> 5. emerge -N lxde-meta
I'd prefer Xfce, but that's a matter of
Am Dienstag, 12. September 2017, 17:55:22 CEST schrieb Raffaele Belardi:
> After several months of Gnome3 I decided it is too heavy for my old
> workstation and would like to go back to LXDE. The flow could be:
>
> 1. rebuild kernel with openRC support and install
> 2. emerge -C gnome networkmanag
Thanks for the suggestions. I'd rather not modify
/usr/share/portage/config/repos.conf if I can help it and /usr/portage is
completely empty in my installation. I've been toying around with adding a
'deleted' attribute to the repository section. I'll start a discussion in
the portage dev channel.
On Wed, 9 Apr 2014 12:42:42 -0700
Alex Crawford wrote:
> I am attempting to remove the default 'gentoo' repository definition
> from my list of repositories. Even though I am using a custom
> repos.conf in /etc/portage, I see that portage is including the
> default 'gentoo' entry from /usr/share/
On Sat, 27 Oct 2012 11:22:08 -0500, Tami King wrote:
> I have a new laptop and when it boots after the initial start up the
> output goes from a larger text to something very small with the penguins
> displayed.
That sounds like kernel modesetting (KMS), disable it by adding nomodeset
to the ker
Am Samstag, 27. Oktober 2012, 11:22:08 schrieb Tami King:
> Hello,
>
> I have a new laptop and when it boots after the initial start up the
> output goes from a larger text to something very small with the penguins
> displayed. My desktop doesn't do this and I am pretty sure that I shut
> if off t
On Friday 06 Jul 2012 21:28:08 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Jul 2012 07:35:23 -0400, Robert Herr wrote:
> > On 7/6/12 2:05 AM, gentoo-user+h...@lists.gentoo.org wrote:
> > > Topics (messages 139628 through 139677):
> [massive snip]
>
> This list is for two type of people:
>
> Those who can r
On Fri, 06 Jul 2012 07:35:23 -0400, Robert Herr wrote:
> On 7/6/12 2:05 AM, gentoo-user+h...@lists.gentoo.org wrote:
> > Topics (messages 139628 through 139677):
[massive snip]
This list is for two type of people:
Those who can read documentation well enough to be able to enjoy Gentoo.
Those wh
On Wednesday 15 December 2010 19:24:22 Pau Peris wrote:
> n=`wc -l /var/lib/portage/world|awk '{ print $1 }'`;
> for i in `seq 1 $n`;do
> pkg=`cat /var/lib/portage/world|head -n$i|tail -n1`;
> echo -e "Packages depending on $pkg." >> /tmp/auditWorldFile.log
> equery d $pkg
The following lines creates an auditWorldFile.log log file which will
show packages requires by other packages, so theones you can safely
remove.
#!/bin/bash
n=`wc -l /var/lib/portage/world|awk '{ print $1 }'`;
for i in `seq 1 $n`;do
pkg=`cat /var/lib/portage/world|head -n$i|tail -n1`;
On 12/08/2010 12:23 PM, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
Hi,
does anybody know about an easy method to remove all entries from
/var/lib/portage/world
which would have been pulled in anyway
even if they were not contained in world.
My current attempt would be to write a script
which executes emerge -vpc o
On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 16:22:13 +0100, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> Sorry, but I still don't see it.
> The main question is which packages might be removed
> from 'world'?
If you don't use it directly, it should probably be removed - so lib* for
a start. Then run emerge --depclean -p and see what would
Are you sure it's even it gentoolkit? I have that but no auditworld on x86.
It's not in gentoolkit-dev either.
It's not IN gentoolkit, it NEEDS gentoolkit.
It is here: http://paste.pocoo.org/show/302273/
Greetings
Sebastian Beßler
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Stroller wrote:
>
> On 8/12/2010, at 4:11pm, Albert Hopkins wrote:
> > ...
> > I have a script I used to locate "redudancies" in the world file. It
> > requires gentoolkit. It basically looks at packages in world that have
> > reverse dependencies also in world (b
On 12/08/10 17:11:58, Albert Hopkins wrote:
> I have a script I used to locate "redudancies" in the world file. It
> requires gentoolkit. It basically looks at packages in world that
> have
> reverse dependencies also in world (but only goes one level deep).
> Just
>
> # auditworld < /var/lib/p
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 16:28 +, Stroller wrote:
> > http://paste.pocoo.org/show/302273/
>
> I think this only works on ~ARCH, right?
>
> On x86 I get:
>
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "./auditworld", line 20, in
> import gentoolkit.sets
> ImportError: No module named sets
On 8/12/2010, at 4:11pm, Albert Hopkins wrote:
> ...
> I have a script I used to locate "redudancies" in the world file. It
> requires gentoolkit. It basically looks at packages in world that have
> reverse dependencies also in world (but only goes one level deep). Just
>
> # auditworld < /var
Helmut Jarausch :
> Hi,
>
> does anybody know about an easy method to remove all entries from
> /var/lib/portage/world
> which would have been pulled in anyway
> even if they were not contained in world.
>
> My current attempt would be to write a script
> which executes emerge -vpc on each entry in
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 07:57 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:23 AM, Helmut Jarausch
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > does anybody know about an easy method to remove all entries from
> > /var/lib/portage/world
> > which would have been pulled in anyway
> > even if they were not contain
Apparently, though unproven, at 17:22 on Wednesday 08 December 2010, Helmut
Jarausch did opine thusly:
> On 12/08/10 14:40:56, Matthew Summers wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:23 AM, Helmut Jarausch
> >
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > does anybody know about an easy method to remove all en
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:23 AM, Helmut Jarausch
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does anybody know about an easy method to remove all entries from
> /var/lib/portage/world
> which would have been pulled in anyway
> even if they were not contained in world.
>
> My current attempt would be to write a script
> which
On 12/08/10 14:40:56, Matthew Summers wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:23 AM, Helmut Jarausch
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > does anybody know about an easy method to remove all entries from
> > /var/lib/portage/world
> > which would have been pulled in anyway
> > even if they were not contained in wor
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:23 AM, Helmut Jarausch
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does anybody know about an easy method to remove all entries from
> /var/lib/portage/world
> which would have been pulled in anyway
> even if they were not contained in world.
>
> My current attempt would be to write a script
> which
On Sat, 06 Feb 2010 15:22:19 -0600, Dale wrote:
> >> True but if the OP hasn't cleaned his before, he may very well have a
> >> lot of cleaning to do as well. I clean mine every few months and it
> >> still has some size to the output.
> >>
> > That's why I run it every week :)
> You got
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Sat, 06 Feb 2010 14:01:47 -0600, Dale wrote:
That just means you have a lot of cleaning up to do :P
True but if the OP hasn't cleaned his before, he may very well have a
lot of cleaning to do as well. I clea
On Sat, 06 Feb 2010 14:01:47 -0600, Dale wrote:
> > That just means you have a lot of cleaning up to do :P
> True but if the OP hasn't cleaned his before, he may very well have a
> lot of cleaning to do as well. I clean mine every few months and it
> still has some size to the output.
That's
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:11:49 -0600, Dale wrote:
eix-test-obsolete
Be prepared for a LONG list tho. It prints a LOT on mine.
That just means you have a lot of cleaning up to do :P
True but if the OP hasn't cle
On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:11:49 -0600, Dale wrote:
> eix-test-obsolete
>
> Be prepared for a LONG list tho. It prints a LOT on mine.
That just means you have a lot of cleaning up to do :P
--
Neil Bothwick
I wonder how much deeper would the ocean be without sponges.
signature.asc
Description:
On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 21:56:43 -0200
Crístian Viana wrote:
> for example, I may have:
>
> =www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.6
>
> but later (hopefully) this package will be unmasked and that entry
> becomes totally useless.
# emerge eix
# eix-test-obsolete -d
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
hi,
I'd like to remove unneeded entries on package.keywords and I was
wondering if there's some program to do that (or if it's a good idea
for me to try to do it :) ). for example, I may have:
=www-client/mozilla-firefox-3.6
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Willie Wong wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 01:03:39PM -0700, Penguin Lover Mark Knecht squawked:
>> dragonfly ~ # emerge -Cp =cat/pack-ver
>> !!! '=cat/pack-ver' is not a valid package atom.
>> !!! Please check ebuild(5) for full details.
>> dragonfly ~ #
>>
>> dra
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 01:03:39PM -0700, Penguin Lover Mark Knecht squawked:
> dragonfly ~ # emerge -Cp =cat/pack-ver
> !!! '=cat/pack-ver' is not a valid package atom.
> !!! Please check ebuild(5) for full details.
> dragonfly ~ #
>
> dragonfly ~ # eix pack-ver
> No matches found.
> dragonfly ~
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 2:33 PM, Jacob Todd wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 04:41:51PM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> I was updating my wife's machine today and noticed that there are a
>> number of older/stranded gcc-config's left on the machine. I still
>> have gcc-4.1.2 but the other 3.3/3.4 versi
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 04:41:51PM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> I was updating my wife's machine today and noticed that there are a
> number of older/stranded gcc-config's left on the machine. I still
> have gcc-4.1.2 but the other 3.3/3.4 versions should not remain.
>
> How would I remove these?
>
On Tuesday 05 May 2009 09:44:58 KH wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am searching for the opposite of emerge --noreplace . I forgot
> -1 and now the package is part of the world file. It does not belong
> there, it is a dependency I wanted to update. I don't want to run
> --unmerge and -av1 again. What can I do?
On Tue, 05 May 2009 10:00:40 +0200, KH
wrote:
> Dale schrieb:
>> AllenJB wrote:
>>> From Portage 2.2 rc30 onwards you can use --deselect. This ability is
>>> not present in any previous version.
>>>
>>> Until you're using Portage 2.2, the other alternative is to manually
>>> edit the world file (M
Dale schrieb:
> AllenJB wrote:
>> From Portage 2.2 rc30 onwards you can use --deselect. This ability is
>> not present in any previous version.
>>
>> Until you're using Portage 2.2, the other alternative is to manually
>> edit the world file (MAKE A BACKUP FIRST!)
>>
>> AllenJB
>>
>
> I have done
AllenJB wrote:
> From Portage 2.2 rc30 onwards you can use --deselect. This ability is
> not present in any previous version.
>
> Until you're using Portage 2.2, the other alternative is to manually
> edit the world file (MAKE A BACKUP FIRST!)
>
> AllenJB
>
I have done this a few times as well and
From Portage 2.2 rc30 onwards you can use --deselect. This ability is
not present in any previous version.
Until you're using Portage 2.2, the other alternative is to manually
edit the world file (MAKE A BACKUP FIRST!)
AllenJB
KH wrote:
Hi,
I am searching for the opposite of emerge --norep
On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 12:58 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 19:44:01 +0800, William Kenworthy wrote:
>
> > Its just dawned on me that this is kde-meta - is there a way to just
> > remove all kde at once?
>
> emerge -C kde-meta
> emerge --depclean -a
>
Thanks Neil, I used the xa
On Sat, 2009-04-11 at 14:04 +0200, Uwe wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 19:44:01 +0800
> William Kenworthy wrote:
>
> > I have got myself into a bind with kde 3.5.10 and 3.5.9 - I would like
> > to unmerge all kde and then remerge it as 3.5.10. Currently its taken
> > me ages to unmerge packages as
On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 19:44:01 +0800
William Kenworthy wrote:
> I have got myself into a bind with kde 3.5.10 and 3.5.9 - I would like
> to unmerge all kde and then remerge it as 3.5.10. Currently its taken
> me ages to unmerge packages as I have emereg world, which its just
> dawned on me is only
On Sat, 11 Apr 2009 19:44:01 +0800, William Kenworthy wrote:
> Its just dawned on me that this is kde-meta - is there a way to just
> remove all kde at once?
emerge -C kde-meta
emerge --depclean -a
--
Neil Bothwick
I couldn't repair your brakes, so I made your horn louder.
signature.asc
Des
> -Original Message-
> From: Neil Bothwick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 1:40 PM
>
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:34:27 -0800, Michael Higgins wrote:
>
> > I have a server that had been running dhcpcd to get it's IP address.
> >
> > I don't want to do like thi
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Higgins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hello, list --
>
> I have a server that had been running dhcpcd to get it's IP address.
>
> I don't want to do like this anymore, so I removed the
> package and attempted to configure the interface manually.
>
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 11:34:27 -0800, Michael Higgins wrote:
> I have a server that had been running dhcpcd to get it's IP address.
>
> I don't want to do like this anymore, so I removed the package and
> attempted to configure the interface manually.
How? We can't guess at what changes you made.
El Mon, 13 Nov 2006 15:22:25 +0200
Uwe Thiem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> On 13 November 2006 14:44, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> > On Sunday 12 November 2006 21:40, Jesús Guerrero wrote:
> > > I never trusted prelink. So, I dont trust it to un-prelink either.
> > >
> > > The best way to make su
El Mon, 13 Nov 2006 07:29:07 +0100
"Marco Calviani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Hi,
>
> > emerge -euD world
>
> but: is this going to recompile everything (e option) or only those
> that needs upgrade?
>
> Regards,
> mc
Everything, but, except for the few packages that are binary-only or
d
On Monday 13 November 2006 14:22, Uwe Thiem wrote:
> On 13 November 2006 14:44, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> > On Sunday 12 November 2006 21:40, Jesús Guerrero wrote:
> > > I never trusted prelink. So, I dont trust it to un-prelink either.
> > >
> > > The best way to make sure your binaries are not
On 13 November 2006 14:44, Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
> On Sunday 12 November 2006 21:40, Jesús Guerrero wrote:
> > I never trusted prelink. So, I dont trust it to un-prelink either.
> >
> > The best way to make sure your binaries are not altered by 3rd party
> > tools is this:
> >
> > emerge -euD w
On Sunday 12 November 2006 21:40, Jesús Guerrero wrote:
> I never trusted prelink. So, I dont trust it to un-prelink either.
>
> The best way to make sure your binaries are not altered by 3rd party tools
> is this:
>
> emerge -euD world
This is slightly amusing. Remerging every package while preli
On Sunday 12 November 2006 20:58, Marco Calviani wrote:
> Hi list,
>i would like to remove prelink and put the system to the state it
> has before the prelink procedure. I've read that a
>
> # prelink -ua
>
> can do the job but i would have some suggestions from you all. It is
> enough to behav
On 12 November 2006 22:40, Jesús Guerrero wrote:
> I never trusted prelink. So, I dont trust it to un-prelink either.
Just out of curiosity: Why? As in "it doesn't do its job" or as in "it makes
the system unstable"?
My whole system is prelinked and it is very stable. Startup times of C++
appl
Marco Calviani wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> emerge -euD world
>
> but: is this going to recompile everything (e option) or only those
> that needs upgrade?
>
> Regards,
> mc
>--emptytree (-e)
> Reinstalls all world packages and their dependencies to
> the current USE
> sp
Hi,
emerge -euD world
but: is this going to recompile everything (e option) or only those
that needs upgrade?
Regards,
mc
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
El Domingo, 12 de Noviembre de 2006 20:58, Marco Calviani escribió:
> Hi list,
>i would like to remove prelink and put the system to the state it
> has before the prelink procedure. I've read that a
>
> # prelink -ua
>
> can do the job but i would have some suggestions from you all. It is
> eno
On 7/20/06, Nunya Bidness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
REMOVE
You can check out any time you like, but you can never leave.
Jerry McBride wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 July 2006 18:00, Nunya Bidness wrote:
>
>> REMOVE
>>
>
> NO!
>
This may help you get rid of us. O_O
> To unsubscribe from a list, send an empty email to:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
In other words, send a email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Give that a try
On Wednesday 19 July 2006 18:00, Nunya Bidness wrote:
> REMOVE
NO!
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Sorry to break out of the thread where this is being discussed but I
> got part way thru some instructions about getting nvidia-glx setup and
> saw something that looks like it might throw a monkey wrench into
> things.
>
> I've emerged nvidia-kernel without problems.
> T
On 6/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[blocks B ] >=x11-base/xorg-server-1.0.99
(is blocking media-video/nvidia-glx-1.0.8762)
[ebuild N] media-video/nvidia-glx-1.0.8762
USE="-dlloader" 0 kB
Is this normal... is nvidia-glx a replacement to xorg-server?
Actual
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 20:34 +0200, Rumen Yotov wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 17:45 +0100, osv wrote:
> > > Did you send them from your subscription address?
> >
> > Yes, I'm sure I did. Bwhua!!!
> Hi,
> This is from memory only, sorry deleted the other mails from the thread.
> You said to have se
On Tue, 2006-02-07 at 17:45 +0100, osv wrote:
> > Did you send them from your subscription address?
>
> Yes, I'm sure I did. Bwhua!!!
Hi,
This is from memory only, sorry deleted the other mails from the thread.
You said to have send a mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
IMHO this should be:[EMAIL PROTECTED
andrew turner schreef:
> Quoting osv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> Hi all! It's at least one week that I try to unsubscribe from the
>> list, but it seems
>>
>> they're not considering me at all! I sent various empty mails (and
>> even one or two with something written in) to
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTE
Quoting osv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all!
> It's at least one week that I try to unsubscribe from the list, but it seems
>
> they're not considering me at all!
> I sent various empty mails (and even one or two with something written in) to
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I seem to remember a post a whil
> Did you send them from your subscription address?
Yes, I'm sure I did. Bwhua!!!
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, 7 Feb 2006 16:18:49 +0100, osv wrote:
> I sent various empty mails (and even one or two with something written
> in) to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> but nothing happened.
Did you send them from your subscription address?
--
Neil Bothwick
By the time you can make ends meet, they move the ends.
On Tuesday 07 February 2006 17:18, osv wrote:
> Hi all!
> It's at least one week that I try to unsubscribe from the list, but it
> seems they're not considering me at all!
> I sent various empty mails (and even one or two with something written in)
> to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> but nothing happened.
>
>
On Monday 06 February 2006 21:38, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 10:46:00 -0800 (PST), Peter H. wrote:
>
> [nothing]
>
> Now the person who suggested filtering mails with an empty subject and
> only 'unsubscribe' in the body should understand why it wouldn't work...
It wouldn't work aga
On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 10:46:00 -0800 (PST), Peter H. wrote:
[nothing]
Now the person who suggested filtering mails with an empty subject and
only 'unsubscribe' in the body should understand why it wouldn't work...
--
Neil Bothwick
Daisy Duke shorts would never go out of fashion.
signature.asc
On Monday 06 February 2006 13:46, a tiny voice compelled Peter H. to write:
Send an email to:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Regards, Ernie
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Monday 06 February 2006 13:46, Peter H. wrote:
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
NO!!
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wednesday 11 January 2006 08:04, Michael Kintzios wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Steve Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 11 January 2006 12:42
> > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> > Subject: [gentoo-user] remove suse, install gentoo
> >
> >
> > box: Prostar 2.8Gig Pro
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 11 January 2006 12:42
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: [gentoo-user] remove suse, install gentoo
>
>
> box: Prostar 2.8Gig ProStar Laptop w/60 Gig, 7200 rpm hard
> drive, 1 Gig Ram
> Current conf
Anthony Roy schreef:
> I replaced SUSE with Gentoo on my server a few months back. I
> installed Gentoo from Suse, so that the server stayed up and running
> whilst I installed and configured everything. I did the install on a
> separate partition, and once everything was configured and any data
I replaced SUSE with Gentoo on my server a few months back. I
installed Gentoo from Suse, so that the server stayed up and running
whilst I installed and configured everything. I did the install on a
separate partition, and once everything was configured and any data
copied over, I booted up into G
92 matches
Mail list logo