=1=y
Presentation by the DG and responses by member states available:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f1yyUaPY58I
Kind regards,
Emily.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving e
the least pollution.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14693062.2023.2268070?scroll=top=true
To cite this article:
Emily Lewis-Brown, Neil Jennings, Morena Mills & Robert Ewers (2023)
Comparison of carbon management and emissions of universities that did
and did not adopt volun
Hypothesis of Global CO2, SO2, NOx—Evidence from 43
Economies and 56 Sectors
by Ke Zhang and Xingwei Wang in the International Journal of
Environmental Research and Public Health
Best wishes,
Emily.
(PhD candidate, Imperial College London)
On 2022-06-21 17:01, 'Chris Vivian' via geoengineering
Hi all,
Please can I offer a paper we published some years ago, which may now need
updating. I hope it helps and is of interest.
It looks in detail at ocean carbon pumps and how a warmer world and higher
CO2 world reduces the sinks.
Best wishes,
Emily Lewis-Brown
Impacts of the Oceans on Climate
ed for CDR and one which
avoids slandering scientists generically?
Thanks,
Emily
Sent from my BlackBerry®
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Lockley <andrew.lock...@gmail.com>
Sender: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 14:29:29
To: geoengineering<geoengineeri
wishes to all and please do understand how much I appreciate everyone's
efforts to understand, respectfully debate and develop solutions to our
collective crises, regardless of our sometimes differing views.
Best,
Emily.
Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone on O2
-Original Message-
From
affecting how much moisture
the air can hold?
Others?
Happy for people to correct and contribute others,
I think it might make an interesting (mag or news, rather than science
publication?) article if anyone is interested in working with me on it.
Thanks, Emily.
Sent from my BlackBerry
Hi, I am not really fussy about the name, it is a list of types or categories
of processes that we do that knowingly change the climate through deliberate
actions, knowing the effect. Thanks for not disrupting my effort to collate
info. Bw Emily
Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone on O2
, should really be built ccs ready - which means
corrosion resistant pipework, as CO2 is more corrosive.
Best wishes,
Emily.
-Original Message-
From: Hawkins, Dave dhawk...@nrdc.org
Sender: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 20:08:07
To: gh...@sbcglobal.netgh
a seriously good and balanced overview essay on geo-eng that
covers these issues as well has the risk debate, because I'd love to send it to
some engineering colleagues.
Thanks,
Emily
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Lockley andrew.lock...@gmail.com
Sender: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
situations, which may
also be more prone to disease and pests?
Interesting that the healdine wasn't 'biochar doubles crop production, !!
Thanks
Emily
Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone on O2
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Lockley andrew.lock...@gmail.com
Sender: geoengineering
wishes,
Emily
Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone on O2
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Salter s.sal...@ed.ac.uk
Sender: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Date: Sat, 08 Feb 2014 12:57:38
To: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Reply-To: s.sal...@ed.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [geo] Olson gives Spoerl
to agree to
stop.
I am not sure i understand why efforts with the intention of being positive are
viewed so negatively when things we do in full knowledge of their negative
impacts are allowed to continue and increase with little or no successful
strategies to stop them.
Best wishes,
Emily.
Sent
I think the film has scientific inaccuracies (on ocean acidification for
example) as well as a strong bias.
Perhaps the script can be reviewed and revised?
Many thanks,
Emily
Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone on O2
-Original Message-
From: John Latham john.latha...@manchester.ac.uk
. Solutions 1(5): 57-66.
On Oct 20, 2013, at 11:12 AM, Greg Rau wrote:
Dear Emily,
Just to clarify:
1) Whales themselves are net sources of CO2 to the atmosphere - they consume
and respire many times their weight in marine carbon that they then ventilate
to air. HOWEVER, it has been suggested
or producing any new
fossil carbon emissions?
Greene, C. Monger, B. Huntley, M. 2010. Geoengineering: the inescapable truth
of getting to 350. Solutions 1(5): 57-66.
On Oct 20, 2013, at 11:12 AM, Greg Rau wrote:
Dear Emily,
Just to clarify:
1) Whales themselves are net sources of CO2
Funnily, i thought the London Convention should limit the amount of CO2 dumped
into the ocean, causing ocean acidification.
Maybe they woke up to this by now.
Best wishes
Emily
Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone on O2
-Original Message-
From: Ken Caldeira kcalde...@carnegiescience.edu
wording which supports exisiting whale cionservation methods.
Thanks
Emily.
Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone on O2
-Original Message-
From: Greg Rau gh...@sbcglobal.net
Sender: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:05:01
To: Michael Hayesvoglerl...@gmail.com
and carbon cycling eco-functions also.
Thanks
Emily
Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone on O2
-Original Message-
From: em...@lewis-brown.net
Sender: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 11:52:08
To: gh...@sbcglobal.net; Michael Hayesvoglerl...@gmail.com;
geoengineering
, with no perceived
negatives. It is possible to do this well. Hemp on mass might be another
option, but may get branded as wooly. Thanks, emily.
Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone on O2
-Original Message-
From: Ronal W. Larson rongretlar...@comcast.net
Sender: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Date
.
Emily
Sent from my BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Greg Rau gh...@sbcglobal.net
Sender: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:12:09
To: geoengineering@googlegroups.comgeoengineering@googlegroups.com
Reply-To: gh...@sbcglobal.net
Subject: [geo] More on Arctic methane
themselves and this
could be either beneficial or detrimental to the corals and would need to be
included in an impact assessment.
Bw, emily.
Sent from my BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: John Latham john.latha...@manchester.ac.uk
Sender: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Date: Wed, 26 Jun
'scare the
public', ie sensoring the data to make it more palatable. Best wishes
Emily
Sent from my BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Veli Albert Kallio albert_kal...@hotmail.com
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2013 03:57:34
To: em...@lewis-brown.netem...@lewis-brown.net;
neum...@gmail.comneum
Hi, thanks for this. Very useful.
The Sea ice outlook is also offered on the Arcus website
http://www.arcus.org/search/seaiceoutlook/2013/june
Interesting that the Met Office is the lowest projection.
Best wishes,
Emily.
Sent from my BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Erik Neumann neum
substrate to do some lab tests, and then field trials. If anyone has any
constructive thoughts, I am keen to hear back.
Many thanks,
Emily.
Sent from my BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Peter Flynn peter.fl...@ualberta.ca
Sender: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 14
On energy source, can the temp or pressure difference between deeper and
surface water and air be used? The problem I see is keeping the kit working in
hostile environemnt.
Sent from my BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Hawkins, Dave dhawk...@nrdc.org
Sender:
, it may be
polluted.
Best wishes,
Emily.
Sent from my BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Ken Caldeira kcalde...@carnegiescience.edu
Sender: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2013 15:05:06
To: jrandomwin...@gmail.comjrandomwin...@gmail.com
Reply-To: kcalde...@gmail.com
Cc
-engineers
from the likes of ETC and other advocates against geo-eng.
Many thanks,
Emily
Sent from my BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Ken Caldeira kcalde...@carnegiescience.edu
Sender: kcalde...@gmail.com
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2013 17:01:30
To: Andrew Lockleyandrew.lock...@gmail.com
Cc: Emily Lewis
and mitigation opportunities.
To clarify - I do not support the Outcome statement.
Best wishes,
Emily.
On 13/05/2013 19:56, Emily L-B wrote:
Hi folks -
I wanted to share with you a statement that was drafted at the conclusion
of a week of workshops, plenaries, dialogues and debates convened
I find it hard to read past a sentence when it is fundamentally flawed: the
word 'instead' should read 'as well as'!
'Instead of reducing carbon emissions, let’s tinker'
How frustrating!
Best wishes all,
Emily
Sent from my BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Lockley andrew.lock
(ameliorated) whether the SRM takes
place or not.
In good faith,
Emily.
Sent from my BlackBerry
-Original Message-
From: RAU greg gh...@sbcglobal.net
Sender: geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2013 10:31:59
To: omeconom...@gmail.com; geoengineering@googlegroups.com
Reply-To: gh
http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/event/1382
sorry if this is already obvious - event in UK next week.
best wishes to all,
Emily.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
geoengineering group.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering
- the time for action to restabilise it is long past - we are
now playing catch up.
Best wishes,
Emily.
On 24/03/2012 08:44, Ken Caldeira wrote:
Note that the papre says:
The cooling is generally
stronger over land than over ocean in both models,
but HadGEM2 also shows cooling over the Arctic
Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser.
http://us1.campaign-archive1.com/?u=0ebaeb14fdbf5dc65289113c1id=fa9da409f6e=60a7483168
*Climate Variability and Climate Change:*
*The New Climate Dice*
Was this year's Texas anomaly
hi
for a good intro to the several polar amplifications in the north -
please see the ACIA http://www.acia.uaf.edu/
best wishes,
Emily.
On 14/10/2011 08:21, John Gorman wrote:
Just one small point since I have looked at Polar Amplification.
Warming is driven by currents from the Atlantic
the situation and options as
broadly as possible in a moderate tone and simple language. It'd need to
be very short too - total 4 pages.
many thanks and best wishes,
Emily.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
geoengineering group.
To post to this group
project would go through
a risk and EIA process which would identify the lower risk options.
best wishes,
Emily.
On 01/09/2011 11:31, Veli Albert Kallio wrote:
*I have recenly been occupied many non-geoengineering aspects of
climate change, but today I received email from UK Met Office which
, as ever, still seems disputed. How to we
overcome this and move from discussion and research to scaling up field
trials and helpful action?
best wishes,
Emily.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
geoengineering group.
To post to this group, send email
Hi,
here is a recent paper from Jim Hansen,including some figures I've read
before, which stunned me:
In the early Pliocene global temperature was no more than 1-2°C warmer
than today, yet sea level was 15-25 meters (50-80 feet) higher.
best wishes,
Emily.
*Paleoclimate Implications
intervention to stabilise
the Arctic and restore the sea ice, or at least its functionality.
very best wishes,
Emily.
On 18/07/2011 22:16, Mike MacCracken wrote:
The sea ice is already becoming dysfunctional in a number of ways--for some
marine animals, for indigenous communities on barrier islands
functionally extinct already... eg in Hudson Bay...
Sea ice performs so many different functions it's hard to even list them.
best wishes,
Emily.
On 18/07/2011 17:24, rongretlar...@comcast.net wrote:
Ken (cc list)
I have tried (as a rank amateur observer, not participant) to
follow
/Cecilie_Mauritzen/filestore/Reid_etal_advMarBiol2009.pdf
plus: changes akin to the loss of the dinosaurs afoot.
The Arctic chapter gives good evidence of why geo-eng is needed. This
wwf commissioned report also considers ocean fertilisation.
best,
Emily.
On 20/06/2011 16:43, Andrew Lockley wrote
.
NGO letter to the IPCC geoengineering meeting
(http://www.etcgroup.org/en/node/5267)
http://www.etcgroup.org/en/node/5267
Hands Off Mother Earth : HOME campaign
(http://www.handsoffmotherearth.org) http://www.handsoffmotherearth.org/
best wishes,
Emily.
--
You received this message because
hi
hope this is of interest.
best wishes,
Emily.
Global climate talks
Global warming crisis may mean world has to suck greenhouse gases from air
As Bonn talks begin, UN climate chief warns of temperature goals set too low
and clock ticking on climate change action
Fiona Harvey
Hi,
I wonder is anyone working on climate mitigation through active
intervention (SRM or CDR) to input into the Rio plus 20 Earth Summit in
2012?
It might be an interesting opportunity.
many thanks,
Emily.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sorry if you all have this already.
*Joint IPCC Expert Meeting of WGI, WGII and WGIII on Geoengineering*
This Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Expert Meeting
will take place at a location to be determined. It will provide a
platform for exchange and discussion among experts
fyi
Fertilizing Oceans Seen Fruitless In Climate Fight
*Date:* /01-Feb-11/
*Country:* NORWAY
*Author:* Alister Doyle
Fertilizing the oceans to boost the growth of tiny plants that soak up
greenhouse gases is unlikely to work as a way to slow climate change, a
U.N.-backed study showed on
Hi,
please read the last sentence in particular: FoE now join WWF in
accepting the possible need for geo-engineering. I agree with this analysis.
I am trying to track down a link tot he report - if you have one, please
circulate.
manyt hanks and Best wishes,
Emily.
RECKLESS GAMBLERS
key
hi
here is the link :
http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Environment/documents/2010/12/15/CarbonBudgetsReportdec14final.pdf
I haven't found it on the FoE website though and their office is now closed.
let me know if you need the pdf.
best wishes,
Emily.
On 15/12/2010 16:37, Emily
Please join the Woodrow Wilson Center’s Environmental Change Security
Program, Program on America and the Global Economy, and Science and
Technology Innovation Program for a book launch of
Fixing the Sky: The Checkered History of Weather and Climate Control
featuring
James Rodger Fleming,
am so relieved to hear
that the NERC study found this argument not to be as prevalent as assumed.
It can be viewed like this : I need both food and water to live.
Drinking water doesn't mean I don't need to eat.
I hope this perspective helps,
very best wishes,
Emily.
On 18/09/2010 15:34
Subject: geo-engineering and climate
See
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/sep/13/geoengineering-coalition-world-climate
best wishes,
Emily.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
geoengineering group.
To post to this group, send email
best wishes,
Emily.
Dear Colleague,
NERC has published the final report of Experiment Earth? , our public
dialogue on geoengineering. It can be found at:
http://www.nerc.ac.uk/about/consult/geoengineering.asp together with a
short leaflet summarising the findings and recommendations from
FYI. Best, Emily.
NOAA scientist sees 'negligible' cooling impact from volcano
(04/21/2010)
Lauren Morello, EE reporter
The ongoing eruption of Iceland's Eyjafjallajökull volcano appears
unlikely to have a significant immediate cooling effect on Earth's
climate, a top federal scientist said
may be harder. One issue with CCS which seemed
like it would be hard to overcome were liability and intelectual
property issues, but mostly the liability issue - if there are leaks and
other impacts - who is responsible?
very best,
Emily.
--
You received this message because you
55 matches
Mail list logo
