Ciao Jody,
I am kind of puzzed here (maybe it's time to go to bed) since I do not
understand why you are talking about controling decimation.
My base goal with the Geometry --> Shape converters was to move them outsie
of the renderer
in order to be able to leverage on them from the coverage proc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Heads up x2
>
> You are probably not going to get a geoserver branch; everyone is doing
> everything they can to slow down and work together (a branch runs counter to
> that - it allows you to move quickly but alone).
>
>
Agred It would be better not to be on a branc
Heads up x2
You are probably not going to get a geoserver branch; everyone is doing
everything they can to slow down and work together (a branch runs counter to
that - it allows you to move quickly but alone).
Justin perhaps it would be good if you outlined the conditions under which you
would
Saul Farber wrote:
>> who is using geoserver as a WFS in production systems?
>>
>
> Commonwealth of Massachusetts in the USA is.
>
>
cool!
>> Is it as a "point of truth" or as a public usage data source (if the
>> latter, URLs anyone, and what is the basis of the "contract:" between
>> t
Jody Garnett wrote:
> Right - I understand what you are doing. But what we really want is
> you to update "the 1000 bugs" caused when the geotools codebase
> switches to FeatureTypeBuilder and FeatureBuilder.
>
> We need you to do this work (or organize a work party of volunteers to
> get it don
Hi Simboss; just a follow up to our question on how to separate out the
Geometry -> Shape transition from the rendering code. Since we will be
defining no new API we do not need a proposal for this one; you have my
permission as module maintainer to package up the code in *main*; and I
seem to
Today I wrote:
> Now I started creating the interface to GeoTools in order to pass
> symbolizers back and forth with GT, but got bogged down discovering that
> symbolizers in GeoTools 2.3 reference the deprecated expression API.
> I'm not sure how to proceed.
Sorry, ignore my moaning on this matte
Matthias Basler wrote:
> Hi GeoTools community, hi Jody.
>
> Thanks a lot for your clarification, Jody. I wasn't happy with all answers
> got, but this is another story and shall be told another time. But I think I
> got the idea of what the GeoAPI/GeoTools expressions APIs are up to.
>
> I shoul
Right - I understand what you are doing. But what we really want is you
to update "the 1000 bugs" caused when the geotools codebase switches to
FeatureTypeBuilder and FeatureBuilder.
We need you to do this work (or organize a work party of volunteers to
get it done). Basically put it in your pl
On Monday 12 February 2007 21:40, Jody Garnett wrote:
> Hi Gabriel; I have watched your todo list take place on the wiki ... can
> you fill us all in on your plan? We can even start with your ideas from
> todays meeting (I am sorry I had to shut you down so hard we had an
> agenda to keep - and yo
Hi GeoTools community, hi Jody.
Thanks a lot for your clarification, Jody. I wasn't happy with all answers got,
but this is another story and shall be told another time. But I think I got the
idea of what the GeoAPI/GeoTools expressions APIs are up to.
I should note that I started my own, more
http://geo.openplans.org:9090/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/224/buildId/553
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-
http://geo.openplans.org:9090/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/1/buildId/551
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-in
Hi Gabriel; I have watched your todo list take place on the wiki ... can
you fill us all in on your plan? We can even start with your ideas from
todays meeting (I am sorry I had to shut you down so hard we had an
agenda to keep - and you were told a month ago you could not proceed
along those l
Hi Andrea,
Yup, they should work just fine. The old kvp parsing is still used by
wms and wcs.
It would also be pretty trivial to have the old stuff use gtxml to parse
the filters like wfs does. Either or. Regardless we should ensure that
the gtxml based parser incorporates the patch to the old
Bleah, sorry, my usual spam mail, was supposed to be sent to
geoserver-devel only.
Cheers
Andrea
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technolo
Hi Justin,
I've finished the first part of the now working FILTER support in WMS,
wondering how to port it to trunk.
A quick look seems to suggest WMS is still using old kvp parsing,
so I can simply apply the patches from 1.5.x and they should still
apply ok, right?
Cheers
Andrea
http://geo.openplans.org:9090/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/1/buildId/549
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-in
http://geo.openplans.org:9090/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/1/buildId/548
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-in
Saul Farber ha scritto:
>> who is using geoserver as a WFS in production systems?
>
> Commonwealth of Massachusetts in the USA is.
>
>> Is it as a "point of truth" or as a public usage data source (if the
>> latter, URLs anyone, and what is the basis of the "contract:" between
>> the provider
Sure thing Andrea, sorry about the lack of notice (I had my machine
stripped down to a bare hard drive last week) - looks like I missed
a full weekend of email.
Here is the link for the pictures:
- http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Geometry
Jody
Andrea Aime wrote:
> I won't be there sinc
> who is using geoserver as a WFS in production systems?
Commonwealth of Massachusetts in the USA is.
>
> Is it as a "point of truth" or as a public usage data source (if the
> latter, URLs anyone, and what is the basis of the "contract:" between
> the provider and a client who has to interpr
Can Cory or someone at RR make sure that gtbot is awake for the meeting
:). Thanks.
Jody Garnett wrote:
> Hi everyone, if you want to stop by the IRC channel 1 hour prior to our
> weekly meeting it would be slick.
>
> For an agenda I would like to cover the following:
> - short term road map fo
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Hi everyone, if you want to stop by the IRC channel 1 hour prior to our
> weekly meeting it would be slick.
>
> For an agenda I would like to cover the following:
> - short term road map for unsupported/geometry
> - short term road map for unsupported/jts-wrapper
> - po
Hi everyone, if you want to stop by the IRC channel 1 hour prior to our
weekly meeting it would be slick.
For an agenda I would like to cover the following:
- short term road map for unsupported/geometry
- short term road map for unsupported/jts-wrapper
- porting JTS geometry testing framework (s
The reason is found for my problem. I have simulated request to MapServer
manually.
The GetFeature request to MapServer that is produced by GeoTools 2.2.x
WFSDataStore looks like this:
=
http://www.opengis.net/wfs";
xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/
http://geo.openplans.org:9090/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/224/buildId/547
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-
Andrea Aime wrote:
> Well,
> added the cache, down to 40 seconds. Where are those 40 seconds
> spent? Creating property accessors, and trying to convert a Double
> to double/float going thru a String object!
> Don't you believe me? See:
We believe you :-) In fact we were waiting for you.
Andrea I
Vitali Diatchkov wrote:
> We have some problems with MapServer as a WFS server.
>
Hi Vitali - I am not aware of MapServer WFS Post being very good. At
one point uDig has a table showing what WFS worked and what did not -
MapServer was usually in the non working column based on a different
re
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
> Andrea Aime wrote:
>>
>> Justin, please, have a look at the changes I committed, and tell me
>> which ones really needed a discussion. Have we to require permission
>> for every trivial change we make? I did modify only the inner workings
>> of a few classes.
>>
> T
Andrea Aime wrote:
>
> Justin, please, have a look at the changes I committed, and tell me
> which ones really needed a discussion. Have we to require permission
> for every trivial change we make? I did modify only the inner workings
> of a few classes.
>
The original point was not that the cha
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
> Andrea Aime wrote:
>
>> I was so upset with the obvious disregard of the most basics performance
>> considerations that went and fix without thinking. I have spent days and
>> nights on performance tuning of the streaming renderer, and now these
>> changes blew up
We have some problems with MapServer as a WFS server.
Problems concern FILTER encoding.
This is a request:
12-Feb-2007 17:08:35 org.geotools.data.wfs.LogWriterDecorator flush
FINE: Output:
http://www.opengis.net/wfs";
xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml";
xmlns:ogc="http://www.opengis.net/og
Andrea Aime wrote:
> I was so upset with the obvious disregard of the most basics performance
> considerations that went and fix without thinking. I have spent days and
> nights on performance tuning of the streaming renderer, and now these
> changes blew up my work and make me do more in order t
Andrea Aime wrote:
>
> I'm a little lost here. How do you address performance by using property
> accessors? You seem to imply the work is unfinished, and the stuff that
> could help performance is missing. So, what is that we're missing?
Two possibilities.
1. By not processing the extension p
http://geo.openplans.org:9090/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/1/buildId/546
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-in
WorldFileWriter
---
Key: GEOT-1159
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-1159
Project: GeoTools
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: gc imageio
Environment: All
Reporter: Milton Jonathan
Paul Ramsey ha scritto:
> Perhaps I am misunderstanding the example from the users list, but the
> changes to property access for wfs1.1 seem to have affected normal
> renderer use, which is why the user ran across the problem.
>
> I was going to ask a completely orthogonal question: there are a
Rob Atkinson ha scritto:
>
> This is just an ad-hoc information gathering exercise, since I've seen
> the question floated many times but never a definitive answer
>
> who is using geoserver as a WFS in production systems?
> Is it as a "point of truth" or as a public usage data source (if the
>
This is just an ad-hoc information gathering exercise, since I've seen
the question floated many times but never a definitive answer
who is using geoserver as a WFS in production systems?
Is it as a "point of truth" or as a public usage data source (if the
latter, URLs anyone, and what is the
Rob Atkinson ha scritto:
> Good points Justin, Paul etc
>
> Without any of {correct, useful, fast, reliable and maintainable}
> behaviour, there is failure.
>
> There are several requirements out in the wild:
>
> 1) point of truth - make sure you can deliver to the main infrastructure
> someth
Andrea Aime ha scritto:
> Andrea Aime ha scritto:
> An interesting note is that the same rendering code you
> can get on the user mailing list now takes:
> * 24 seconds on jdk 1.4
> * 5.2 seconds on jdk 1.5
> * 3.8 seconds on jdk 1.6
I just backported one of the changes to 2.3.x, since also
2.3.x
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
> Thanks for the input Simone.
>
> Perhaps I can clarify something. The property access stuff was *not*
> designed to ignore performance, quite the contrary. It is a level of
> indirection that was added to allow multiple concerns to be addressed,
> one major one b
http://geo.openplans.org:9090/continuum/servlet/continuum/target/ProjectBuild.vm/view/ProjectBuild/id/1/buildId/543
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-in
Justin Deoliveira ha scritto:
> Hi Andrea,
>
> I am kind of puzzled why I am not seeing any patches for any of this, or
> at least a wait for some feedback. This is pretty core stuff you are
> changing, and I would like a chance to comment on it before it gets
> committed. I believe this was pa
45 matches
Mail list logo
