Re: [Geotools-devel] [GeoServer/GeoServer Developer] GSIP 232 - Upgrade GeoServer and GeoWebCache Build to Java 17

Hi all, sorry for cross-posting but this is a coordinated effort across GeoTools/GeoServer/GeoWebcache. The pull requests to upgrade the builds to Java 17 and pass the new errorprone/PMD checks are ready: * GeoTools: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/5204 * GeoWebCache: https://github.co

Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal: Adopt Maven Bill of Materials Pattern for GeoTools

ient is prohibited. If you have received this email by mistake, please > notify us immediately by telephone or e-mail > > > On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 8:45 PM Gabriel Roldan < > gabriel.rol...@camptocamp.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'm proposing we

Re: [Geotools-devel] proposal: Adopt Maven Bill of Materials Pattern for GeoTools

4:32 AM Ian Turton wrote: > +1 > > Ian Turton > > On Tue, 20 May 2025, 19:45 Gabriel Roldan, > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'm proposing we adopt the Maven Bill of Materials (BOM) pattern for >> GeoTools. This will standardize dependency version man

[Geotools-devel] proposal: Migrate GeoTools to Java 17

Hi devs, I'd like to introduce this change proposal, Migrate GeoTools to Java 17. This is a planned activity to support the GeoServer 3 crowdfunding work. Details are on the Wiki: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/wiki/Migrate-GeoTools-to-Java-17 Please review and share your feedback. Thanks

[Geotools-devel] proposal: Adopt Maven Bill of Materials Pattern for GeoTools

Hi all, I'm proposing we adopt the Maven Bill of Materials (BOM) pattern for GeoTools. This will standardize dependency version management both for the GeoTools codebase and for downstream projects. This effort is directly related to the "GeoServer 3" project's modernization goals. Details are on

Re: [Geotools-devel] create a 33.1 release in Jira

Done: https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/projects/GEOT/versions/17173/tab/release-report-all-issues thanks for the notice On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 at 09:38, Mark Prins wrote: > could one of the Jira admins please create the 33.1 release in: > > > https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/projects/GEOT?selectedItem

[Geotools-devel] ssh-agent trouble GeoTools 33.x in Jenkins

Hi Jody, I'm having trouble building the new geotools-33.x and geotools-33.x-docs jobs in jenkins. See https://build.geoserver.org/view/geotools/job/geotools-33.x/1/console It's complaining: Building in workspace /var/lib/jenkins/workspace/geotools-33.x FATAL: java.io.IOException: [ssh-agent] Co

[Geotools-devel] New unsupported module: GeoParquet DataStore

Hi list, I'm writing to propose the inclusion of a new unsupported module that implements a DataStore to read GeoParquet. Please check the proposal at GEOT-7737 , and pull request . Let me know if yo

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools 29-RC1 released

The GeoTools 29-RC1 release candidate is available, see the announcement for lots of details. The release is available for download and also d

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.23-RC /1.23-RC/29-RC Release train is starting

Hi all, just a heads up that GeoServer's main branch version was updated to 2.24-SNAPSHOT, depending on GeoTools 30-SNAPSHOT, and GeoWebCache 1.24-SNAPSHOT. Cheers, On Wed, 8 Mar 2023 at 11:08, Gabriel Roldan wrote: > Heads up, I'm going to kick off the 29-RC release of

[Geotools-devel] branch 29.x created, main moved to 30-SNAPSHOT

Hi All, Following our release process the following branches have been updated - main: 30-SNAPSHOT - 29.x: 29-SNAPSHOT, created as stable branch for upcoming RC - 28.x 28-SNAPSHOT, maintenance branch yesterday we had to troubles with the Jenkins build server, so the process to release 29-RC1 con

[Geotools-devel] 2.23-RC /1.23-RC/29-RC Release train is starting

Heads up, I'm going to kick off the 29-RC release of GeoTools this morning, depending on how this goes Andrea will do GWC 1.23-RC and then I will continue with GeoServer 2.23-RC. Cheers, -- Gabriel Roldán ___ GeoTools-Devel mailing list GeoTools-Devel@li

Re: [Geotools-devel] PMD complexity checks... "cognitive complexity"

Hey Andrea, that looks great. Is it complementary with the ExcessiveMethodLength rule or surpasses it? This reminded me I had these unpushed branches. Created a jira ticket and these pr's: https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/3544 https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/3545 https://github

Re: [Geotools-devel] Needs a tie breaker for PR review

Just commented on the issue. On Mon, 24 May 2021 at 04:44, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > there is a PR in the queue where a method has been deprecated, here: > https://github.com/geotools/geotools/pull/3516 > > I don't see a valid reason to deprecate it, and voiced that concern, but > no further ch

Re: [Geotools-devel] Filtering style contents for map rendering and legend rendering

Hey Andrea, that looks great. Here's an idea, instead of two vendor options, use a single one with enum values, like in: normal|legend_only|map_only with "normal" being the default -included both for legend and map rendering- (call it "default" or "both"). On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 at 07:16, Andre

Re: [Geotools-devel] Excessive method length code smell

we're. As said, no rush, and let's see if others feel like contributing. Cheers, Gabriel. > > Cheers > Andrea > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 3:13 PM Gabriel Roldan > wrote: > >> Hey all, >> sorry for cross-posting but this relates to both projects. >> >&g

Re: [Geotools-devel] Excessive method length code smell

both projects also have a fair amount of that > problem. > > Joe Miller > > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 9:12 AM Gabriel Roldan > wrote: > >> Hey all, >> sorry for cross-posting but this relates to both projects. >> >> One of the PMD rules I'd like to

[Geotools-devel] Excessive method length code smell

Hey all, sorry for cross-posting but this relates to both projects. One of the PMD rules I'd like to set up the most is ExcessiveMEthodLength. It'll just fail on a threshold for lines of code in a single method. I've made some assessments for 500 and 100 lines of code limits, check this out: Geo

Re: [Geotools-devel] Starting to work on automatic code cleanups

I think that's impressive and a big help in avoiding a lot of code rotting, big +1 from me, and a huge thanks for the "unchecked" work. On Sat, 12 Dec 2020 at 10:33, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi all, > the unchecked warnings cleanups is done, has just been merged in > GeoServer, completing coverage

[Geotools-devel] Build fails on latest OpenJDK too [Re: GeoTools 22.1 release train reminder]

Just a note that the use of OpenJDK for the build is no longer a valid workaround for the build failure. Any version greater than u212 (which is old already) breaks. I've created https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOT-6472 in order not to forget we do need to fix this test failure on metadata

Re: [Geotools-devel] GSIP RenderListener Extension

On Mon, 14 Oct 2019 at 05:16, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 8:53 PM Gabriel Roldan > wrote: > >> >>> Good point, they should be enclosed, meaning that the layer end needs to >>> be issued from the rendering thread. It can be done, matter of &g

Re: [Geotools-devel] GSIP RenderListener Extension

On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 at 04:31, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 11:36 PM Gabriel Roldan > wrote: > >> Maybe take the opportunity to fix the typo in "featureRenderer()" (it >> should be featureRendered(), shouldn't it?) and for the sake of co

Re: [Geotools-devel] GSIP RenderListener Extension

Maybe take the opportunity to fix the typo in "featureRenderer()" (it should be featureRendered(), shouldn't it?) and for the sake of consistency add feartureStart() and featureEnd(). So maybe deprecating featureRenderer() and make featureStart() a default that calls the deprecated one until it's r

[Geotools-devel] DataUtilities.createSchema fix

Hi Andrea, thanks for merging #2364 and #2365. I've created the corresponding JIRA ticket but can't close it myself. If you can please do, I'll keep in mind the correct procedure before issuing other pr's. https://osgeo-org.atlassian.net/browse/GEOT-6296 Cheers, -- Gabriel Roldán ___

[Geotools-devel] Fix for s3-geotiff external configuration

Hi Devon, I've just created a pull [1] request to fix s3-geotiff external configuration as I'm testing it and found a number of situations where it'd fail. Let me know if you can take a look and if it looks good. I think it being an unsupported module no jira or something else is required. I'll b

Re: [Geotools-devel] clean up tmp dir after tests

On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 5:47 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Gabriel Roldan > wrote: > >> In a nutshell: >> - have /tmp/getotools- and /tmp/geoserver- directories >> - run maven with mvn -Djava.io.tmpdir=/tmp/geotools|geoserver- >> - r

[Geotools-devel] clean up tmp dir after tests

Hello, sorry for the cross-posting but this is about geosever and geotools builds in ares. The build process leaves a lot, literally thousands, of files and directories in the temp directory. I cam across this looking for the reason some geogig temp directories are also left over where they shou

Re: [Geotools-devel] Java 8 is out! Hem... shall we start using java 7? ; -)

pretty much agree with all that's been said. I'm +1 On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Kevin Smith wrote: > I'm another admirer of try-with-resources and AutoCloseable and I'd be happy > to see GWC upped to Java 7 minimum as well. > > > On 26 March 2014 04:58, Andrea Aime wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar

Re: [Geotools-devel] does shapefile datastore support paging?

ce we move to 10.0 I'll be able to test whether the paging support provided by content datastore brings any perf improvement or not. Cheers, Gabriel On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Gabriel Roldan > wrote: > >> Hey there,

[Geotools-devel] does shapefile datastore support paging?

Hey there, It looks to me like the shapefile datastore does not support paging through query's startIndex and maxFeatures. It does support maxFeatures though. So before getting more into it, I just wanted to confirm it doesn't support startIndex and ask whether there's a compelling reason for it.

Re: [Geotools-devel] Request to remove the final modifier on ContentFeatureStore.addFeatures

; final and agree looks to be more consistent as non-final as the other write > methods are. > > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Gabriel Roldan > wrote: >> >> Hi all, specially Jody and Justin as ContentDataStore creators. >> I'd need to remove the final modifi

[Geotools-devel] Request to remove the final modifier on ContentFeatureStore.addFeatures

ework, so kudos for it. Please let me know if there's any problem in applying that change on master: <https://github.com/groldan/geotools/commit/a714e9458abca0c1bea45e3de6f50867517835db> Cheers, Gabriel -- Gabriel Roldan OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight fro

Re: [Geotools-devel] Attempting to update all OGC schemas in GeoTools to the latest version (and hitting a hard wall)

On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > Hi, > some time ago, while discussing validation issues in WCS 2.0 land and > the associated problems with the xlink update, Justin suggested we try to > update > all the OGC schemas in the GeoTools classpath to the latest version. > > I've tr

Re: [Geotools-devel] Pushing GeoGit module out of the build?

gt; LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial > Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support > Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services > Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers > http://p.sf.ne

[Geotools-devel] remove unsupported geogit-versioned module

or the foreseeable future, but I'm sure he left some good stuff in there for the ones of us that will continue the work. Cheers, Gabriel -- Gabriel Roldan OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. -

Re: [Geotools-devel] removing xerces dependency

ics Lite for free today: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct > ___ > GeoTools-Devel mailing list > GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel -- Gabriel Roldan OpenGeo - http:/

Re: [Geotools-devel] Odd failure in wfs-ng on trunk

Resources Research Centre > > > > ---------- > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions &

Re: [Geotools-devel] Odd failure in wfs-ng on trunk

- > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the

Re: [Geotools-devel] Possible mess with the GT Master branch

and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > ___ >

Re: [Geotools-devel] Canonical term - Coverage, Grid or Raster?

e security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > ___ > GeoTools-Devel mailing list > GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] New community module: reshape feature source/store

___ > GeoTools-Devel mailing list > GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > > > > -- > Live Security Virtual Conference >

Re: [Geotools-devel] Geotools 8.0 RC3 or 8.0 release

ence > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] How to use "anonymous" OGC Filter Functions

patch is updated. Cheers, Gabriel > > Cheers -- Gabriel Roldan OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all t

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] How to use "anonymous" OGC Filter Functions

ted that way by default, and possibly document better that you should override it as appropriate, or leave it unimplemented. Any preference? or there's anything else that I'm missing? Cheers, Gabriel On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 3:

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] How to use "anonymous" OGC Filter Functions

Patch attached to <http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-4205> Please review and comment at your earliest convenience. Cheers, Gabriel On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Gabriel Roldan wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Andrea Aime > wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 a

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] How to use "anonymous" OGC Filter Functions

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Gabriel Roldan wrote: > >>> The problem is not the immutability of the object itself, but the one of its >>> parameters. During simplification one might notice one of the paramete

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] How to use "anonymous" OGC Filter Functions

On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Gabriel Roldan wrote: >> Alright, thanks all for the comments. >> A separate interface was my preference as well but for some reason I >> thought it would bring higher hesitation. Glad i

Re: [Geotools-devel] How to use "anonymous" OGC Filter Functions

, Gabriel On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Gabriel Roldan wrote: > >> This works ok except when it comes to use SimplifyingFilterVisitor >> down in the call chain (an hence any DuplicatingFilterVisitor >> specializat

[Geotools-devel] How to use "anonymous" OGC Filter Functions

r.visit(Function, Object) not to go through the SPI lookup for VolatileFunctions, but return them directly. Another possibility is to add a separate marker interface, but I would rather avoid bloating the API. Thoughts? TIA, Gabriel -- Gabriel Roldan OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert s

Re: [Geotools-devel] CapabilitiesFilterSplitter extension point

; > -- > Jody Garnett > > On Thursday, 28 June 2012 at 9:47 PM, Gabriel Roldan wrote: > > ok, if there are no objections so far then I'm inclined to commit the > patch to trunk. Raise your concerns now? > > --

Re: [Geotools-devel] CapabilitiesFilterSplitter extension point

ok, if there are no objections so far then I'm inclined to commit the patch to trunk. Raise your concerns now? On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Gabriel Roldan wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm on a situation where a Filter needs to be split into backend's > supported/uns

[Geotools-devel] CapabilitiesFilterSplitter extension point

Filter getUpdateFilter(String attributePath); -- Gabriel Roldan OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today

Re: [Geotools-devel] Wfs data store: testing request validity

On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 4:15 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 10:32 PM, Gabriel Roldan wrote: > >> I think one way would be to port the wfs http handling to geotools' >> HTTPClient. Then it should be easier to mock up HTTPClient and parse >> whatever i

Re: [Geotools-devel] Wfs data store: testing request validity

the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > ___ > GeoTools-Devel mailing list > GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools

Re: [Geotools-devel] FeatureIdVersionedImpl.equals

etFeatureCollection) in order to keep change to a minimum. > > If you wanted to just get to work today use ListFeatureCollection. > > Jody -- Gabriel Roldan OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. --

Re: [Geotools-devel] FeatureIdVersionedImpl.equals

ay 11, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Gabriel Roldan wrote: > Hey Jody, > > would you remind me of the rationale behind > FeatureIdVersionedImpl.equals() not comparing the feature version too, > but instead behaving as if it where a plain FeatureIdImpl with no > version? > > Asking because

[Geotools-devel] FeatureIdVersionedImpl.equals

a map (i.e. DefaultFeatureCollection). TIA, Gabriel -- Gabriel Roldan OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the

Re: [Geotools-devel] Can't build GeoTools, mvn.geo-solutions.it times out

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 4:10 AM, Daniele Romagnoli wrote: > Hi, > yesterday I should have fixed it. > Can you check whether it's working after the fix? indeed it fixed the issue. Thanks Daniele! Gabriel > > Regards, > Daniele > > > On Wed, May 9, 2012 a

Re: [Geotools-devel] Can't build GeoTools, mvn.geo-solutions.it times out

ons S.A.S. >> Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 >> 55054  Massarosa (LU) >> Italy >> >> phone: (+39) 0584 96.23.13 >> fax:     (+39) 0584 96.23.13 >> mobile:(+39) 331 62.33.686 >> >> http://www.geo-solutions.it >> http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com >

Re: [Geotools-devel] Can't build GeoTools, mvn.geo-solutions.it times out

uess those should be taken off and leave only the one on the root pom? On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Gabriel Roldan wrote: > Hi Alessio, thanks. > I see the repository is added to the root pom. I was actually building > the OpenGeo Suite which builds GeoTools and may have an outdated >

Re: [Geotools-devel] Can't build GeoTools, mvn.geo-solutions.it times out

i > https://twitter.com/alfa7961 > http://twitter.com/geosolutions_it > ----------- > > > > On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 7:43 PM, Gabriel Roldan wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Justin Deoliveira >> wrote: >

Re: [Geotools-devel] Can't build GeoTools, mvn.geo-solutions.it times out

On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > > > On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:32 PM, Gabriel Roldan wrote: >> >> Hey all, >> >> I'm experiencing a build issue due to mvn.geo-solutions.it timing out. >> Seems to be consistent at least on my en

[Geotools-devel] Can't build GeoTools, mvn.geo-solutions.it times out

nce of giving mvn.geo-solutions.it a kick or deploying the imageio-ext artifacts to another repository? TIA, Gabriel -- Gabriel Roldan OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers -- Live Securi

Re: [Geotools-devel] Adding vendor parameter support to the WFS data store

cool. On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 3:02 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Andrea Aime > wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:40 AM, Gabriel Roldan >> wrote: >>> >>> Hey Andrea, >>> >>> feel free to go the way you

Re: [Geotools-devel] Adding vendor parameter support to the WFS data store

t > http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/ > http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT > http://www.linkedin.com/in/andreaaime > http://twitter.com/geowolf > > --- -- Gabriel Roldan OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the devel

Re: [Geotools-devel] Coupling of (DataAccess/Store) code to SimpleFeature implementations.

ecause > support for complex types hadn't been considered or if I'm missing some, > more important, reasons for why the code is structured like this? > > > > Thanks for your help, > > > > Adam Brown > Software Programmer | CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineerin

Re: [Geotools-devel] Refactoring 'Factory' hierarchy to accommodate complex features. Will impact all stores.

oreFactory there to prevent any > unnecessary breaks. > > And yes - your description of those relationships is consistent with my > proposal. > > > Adam > > > > -Original Message- > From: Gabriel Roldan [mailto:grol...@opengeo.org] > Sent: Thursday,

Re: [Geotools-devel] Refactoring 'Factory' hierarchy to accommodate complex features. Will impact all stores.

ase > let me know and I will try to explain myself more lucidly. > > > > Adam Brown > Software Programmer | CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering > > Phone: +61 8 6436 8956 | > adam.br...@csiro.au | www.csiro.au > Address: Australian Resources Research Centr

Re: [Geotools-devel] Request approval for changes to: gt-wfs - org.geotools.data.wfs - WFSDataStoreFactory.java

On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Gabriel Roldan wrote: >> Hello Adam, >> >> glad to hear you're working on that. >> >> Note though that I've been working on a new generation WFS datastore >>

Re: [Geotools-devel] Request approval for changes to: gt-wfs - org.geotools.data.wfs - WFSDataStoreFactory.java

in WFSDataStoreFactory. > > This would give me the ability to create a new implementation of > createDataStore in WFSDataAccessFactory that returns a data access that is > not coupled to simple types. > > Do either of you have any objections to this or alternative suggestions?

Re: [Geotools-devel] Upgrading commons-io dependencies to 2.1?

just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, > Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d > ___ > GeoTools-Devel mailing list > GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourcefor

Re: [Geotools-devel] little patch review

te that I have taken these classes for a walk over to ContentDataStore > land and cleaned them up a bit. > > > Sounds good. > > Cheers, > Gabriel > > > -- > Jody Garnett > > On Monday, 6 February 2012 at 6:31 PM, Gabriel Roldan wrote: > > Hello, > > Workin

Re: [Geotools-devel] little patch review

> -- > Jody Garnett > > On Monday, 6 February 2012 at 6:31 PM, Gabriel Roldan wrote: > > Hello, > > Working on wfs-ng datastore found myself in need for the following two > patches. May as ask for a code review and a statement of whether it's > o

[Geotools-devel] little patch review

eotools/commit/9a46af15dc63a94013a34cdc62a7043d67a699f7> TIA, Gabriel -- Gabriel Roldan OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. -- Try before you buy = See our experts in action! The m

Re: [Geotools-devel] Disabling geogit-versioned by default

; ___ > GeoTools-Devel mailing list > GeoTools-Devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > -- Gabriel Roldan OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. --

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] wfs-ng

pens to everything. The 95/99% the of the times things work you don't hear about it. We're martyrs. Cheers, Gabriel -- Gabriel Roldan OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. --

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs-ng

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Gabriel Roldan wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I'll be working on the wfs-ng module this and next weeks with the >> following high level goals: >> - port to Cont

Re: [Geotools-devel] [Geoserver-devel] wfs-ng

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 7:41 PM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Gabriel Roldan wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I'll be working on the wfs-ng module this and next weeks with the >> following high level goals: >> - port to Cont

[Geotools-devel] wfs-ng

to have a fixed number of threads that hit a given wfs server, and still get some performance improvement by allowing a single request to use multiple threads to fetch contents, as long as the upstream server supports paging. I'm not committed yet to do that,but feedback would be much ap

Re: [Geotools-devel] Authentification in WFSDataStore

GEOS-3967 / GEOT-2961 and therefore should try a newer version of geotools. Hope that helps, Gabriel. -- Gabriel Roldan OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. -- Keep Your Dev

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.7.4 release starting

t fixing a but in SimpleHttpClient to respect the connect/read timeouts. Cheers, Gabriel > > -Justin > > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Gabriel Roldan wrote: >> >> Hi Andrea, >> >> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Andrea Aime >> wrote: >> &

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.7.4 release starting

es the maxConnections input, and under the hood instructs which http backend to use?). For when you wake up that should already be up on svn. Let me know if there's something to change. Cheers, Gabriel > > Btw, if you decide to go either wa

Re: [Geotools-devel] 2.7.4 release starting

ss-platform app development. Create > new or port existing apps to sell to consumers worldwide. Explore the > Intel AppUpSM program developer opportunity. appdeveloper.intel.com/join > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-appdev > ___ > Geotools-de

Re: [Geotools-devel] geogit-versioned module

On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:47 AM, Mark Leslie wrote: > I would like to add the geogit-versioned module, currently attached to > a profile of the same name, to the 'all' build property.  The module > currently builds and tests happily.  Are there any objections or > anything I need to see done before

Re: [Geotools-devel] property-ng datastore

_ > Geotools-devel mailing list > Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel > > -- Gabriel Roldan OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. -

Re: [Geotools-devel] Unsupported module for GeoGIT versioned datastore

-- > > LISAsoft is part of the A2end Group of Companies > http://www.ardec.com.au > http://www.lisasoft.com > http://www.terrapages.com > -- Gabriel Roldan OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from th

Re: [Geotools-devel] Inconsistency in ResourceId

> Gabriel, > As an aside, I've been looking at the wfs-2 datastore work you pointed > me at and trying to find a graceful way of adding the query version > filtering that won't be limited to ResourceId filters.  I was hoping > to have something sensible to discuss with you about that, but haven't >

Re: [Geotools-devel] Inconsistency in ResourceId

g some interesting concerns when both the ResourceId > and Query versioning bits are specified. So far I'm taking the Query > versioning details to narrow those on the ResourceId. > > ... > Your examples are nicer for end users than what I had in mind. I figured if > someone was u

[Geotools-devel] Inconsistency in ResourceId

d I interpreted the spec and wrote the versioning tests for. Does that make sense? Cheers, Gabriel -- Gabriel Roldan OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. -- RSA(R) Conference 2012 S

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: ResourceId

fessionals continues to grow, and the > demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly. > Take a complimentary Learning@Cisco Self-Assessment and learn > about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisc

Re: [Geotools-devel] build failure on process-feature

okay that's good to know. Thanks Andrea. On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:27 AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:13 AM, Gabriel Roldan wrote: > >> I'm getting the bellow failure when building trunk (r38273) locally, but >> hudson seems not to be complaining.

[Geotools-devel] build failure on process-feature

ry.java:369) at org.geotools.process.feature.gs.FeatureGSProcessFactoryFactoryTest.testSum(FeatureGSProcessFactoryFactoryTest.java:61) -- Gabriel Roldan OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. -- The demand for IT n

Re: [Geotools-devel] Charset Encoding Problems?

; >> >> >> > > > -- > The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the > demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly. > Take a complimentary Lea

Re: [Geotools-devel] resourceid vs featureid vs objectid

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Jody Garnett wrote: > I had a quick scan as well; I am starting to feel they screwed up this > specification. Sometimes it is the case that the wfs spec plans around > functionality that does not end up making it into filter spec. I wonder if > they just dropped th

Re: [Geotools-devel] resourceid vs featureid vs objectid

isousRid, while ResourceId (as a filter predicate) can hold the rid, startDate, endDate, and version union type (versionAction|index|timeStamp) So much that Features don't have to return an Identifier object with a bunch of placeholder attributes meant as a query predicate and having not

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: ResourceId

/listinfo/geotools-devel >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Mark Leslie >> Geospatial Software Architect >> LISAsoft >> >> - >> Ph: +61 2 8570 5000 Fax: +61 2 8570 5099

Re: [Geotools-devel] resourceid vs featureid vs objectid

getTimeStamp(); } public enum VersionAction { FIRST, LAST, ALL, NEXT, PREVIOUS } } Does that make sense? Cheers, Gabriel > Jody > -- Gabriel Roldan OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers.

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs package reorg?

e headaches in that regard. > > I am super glad you are enjoying content datastore. > Can you please remember to leave some time / budget in your work for the > client to update the wfs docs. I am trying to ask for a single code example > each time we do stuff; and as long as we get i

Re: [Geotools-devel] wfs package reorg?

> > phone: +39 0584 962313 > fax:      +39 0584 962313 > > http://www.geo-solutions.it > http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/ > http://www.youtube.com/user/GeoSolutionsIT > http://www.linkedin.com/in/andr

Re: [Geotools-devel] FeatureVersioning interface api

>> BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA >> The must-attend event for mobile developers. Connect with experts. >> Get tools for creating Super Apps. See the latest technologies. >> Sessions, hands-on labs, demos & much more. Register e

  1   2   3   >