nesday, December 23, 2009 10:13 AM
To: 'Dale W Jamieson'; 'Matthew Paterson'
Cc: 'Maria Ivanova'; gep-ed@listserve1.allegheny.edu
Subject: RE: Copenhagen result
I concur with Dale that geoengineering's stock is on the rise, and I think
that the trend toward cli
rson
Cc: Maria Ivanova; gep-ed@listserve1.allegheny.edu
Subject: Re: Copenhagen result
i think it's misleading to view the outcome of copenhagen as having been
produced by any single actor. this leads us away from a more complex
analysis that takes seriously the domestic politics and interna
is the one unforgivable
thing...--Blanche DuBois
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Paterson
Date: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 8:48 pm
Subject: Re: Copenhagen result
To: Maria Ivanova , gep-ed@listserve1.allegheny.edu
> A really interesting comment on china¹s strategy here:
>
>
Stacy and all,
It was a trainwreck to be sure, though the silver lining for me (and this
will sound self-serving since it is the area of my current research), is
that perhaps now we can stop thinking that the multilateral process is the
single best (if not the only) way to fashion a global response
stserve1.allegheny.edu on behalf of Stephen Van Holde
Sent: Tue 12/22/2009 1:16 AM
To: Lorraine Elliott
Cc: gep-ed@listserve1.allegheny.edu
Subject: Re: Copenhagen result
Well put, Lorraine. I have exactly the same problem standing in front
of my classes. And I cannot imagine how reps from places lik
mment-4315
Graham
- Original Message -
From: Marc Levy
Date: Monday, December 21, 2009 3:09 pm
Subject: Re: Copenhagen result
To: "Hirsch, Leonard"
Cc: Stephen Van Holde , Lorraine Elliott
, "gep-ed@listserve1.allegheny.edu"
> For what it's worth, I p
t; From: owner-gep...@listserve1.allegheny.edu
> [owner-gep...@listserve1.allegheny.edu] On Behalf Of Stephen Van Holde
> [vanho...@kenyon.edu]
> Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 12:16 PM
> To: Lorraine Elliott
> Cc: gep-ed@listserve1.allegheny.edu
> Subject: Re: Copenhagen res
2.2888 fax
lhir...@si.edu
From: owner-gep...@listserve1.allegheny.edu
[owner-gep...@listserve1.allegheny.edu] On Behalf Of Stephen Van Holde
[vanho...@kenyon.edu]
Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 12:16 PM
To: Lorraine Elliott
Cc: gep-ed@listserve1.allegheny.edu
Subject: Re: Copenhagen result
We
feel pretty dispirited by the whole process at the
moment.
Lorraine
Original Message -
From: Daniel Bodansky
Date: Monday, December 21, 2009 8:48 pm
Subject: Re: Copenhagen result
To: Heike Schroeder
Cc: Daniel Bodansky ,
"gep-ed@listserve1.allegheny.edu"
But countries did m
nsky
Cc: Heike Schroeder; gep-ed@listserve1.allegheny.edu
Subject: Re: Copenhagen result
i think the depth and severity of the structural problems involved in
addressing climate change are well indicated in this thread: some
wonderful, honorable people "sweated blood" to get what would have b
.nyu.edu/object/dalejamieson.html
"Deliberate cruelty is not forgivable. It is the one unforgivable
thing...--Blanche DuBois
- Original Message -
From: Daniel Bodansky
Date: Monday, December 21, 2009 5:25 am
Subject: Re: Copenhagen result
To: Heike Schroeder
Cc: "gep-ed@listserve1.alleghe
-
From: Daniel Bodansky
Date: Monday, December 21, 2009 8:48 pm
Subject: Re: Copenhagen result
To: Heike Schroeder
Cc: Daniel Bodansky , "gep-ed@listserve1.allegheny.edu"
> But countries did move beyond position in significant ways.
> China agreed to international listing and
u
Subject: Fwd: Re: Copenhagen result
Hi all,
I sent the message below last night from an email account not
registered with GEPED, so it bounced. It doesn't take account of
the subsequent discussion from others. For those who are
interested, I've been blogging about t
edu [owner-gep-
e...@listserve1.allegheny.edu] On Behalf Of Daniel Bodansky
[bodan...@uga.edu]
Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 5:19 AM
To: gep-ed@listserve1.allegheny.edu
Subject: Fwd: Re: Copenhagen result
Hi all,
I sent the message below last night from an email account not
registered with GE
From: owner-gep...@listserve1.allegheny.edu
[owner-gep...@listserve1.allegheny.edu] On Behalf Of Daniel Bodansky
[bodan...@uga.edu]
Sent: Monday, December 21, 2009 5:19 AM
To: gep-ed@listserve1.allegheny.edu
Subject: Fwd: Re: Copenhagen result
Hi all,
I sent the message below last night from an em
489324
From: Wil Burns
Reply-To:
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 07:42:53 -0800
To: 'Radoslav Dimitrov' , 'Global Environmental
Politics Education ListServe'
Subject: RE: Copenhagen result
I think amidst all of the (legitimate) gloom about the results at
Copenhagen, we should emp
> Subscribe for free to our publications
> http://www.iisd.ca/email/subscribe.htm
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: owner-gep...@listserve1.allegheny.edu [mailto:
> owner-gep...@listserve1.allegheny.edu] On Behalf Of Lorraine Elliott
> Sent: Sunday, December
orraine Elliott
Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2009 9:01 PM
To: gep-ed@listserve1.allegheny.edu
Subject: Re: Copenhagen result
Hi all
A few quick questions in finding one's way through the Accord - surely
some of the most garbled syntax adopted at an international negotiation?
While the 2 degrees ce
al Message-
From: owner-gep...@listserve1.allegheny.edu
[mailto:owner-gep...@listserve1.allegheny.edu] On Behalf Of Lorraine Elliott
Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2009 9:01 PM
To: gep-ed@listserve1.allegheny.edu
Subject: Re: Copenhagen result
Hi all
A few quick questions in finding one's way thr
Hi all
A few quick questions in finding one's way through the Accord - surely
some of the most garbled syntax adopted at an international negotiation?
While the 2 degrees celsius number is mentioned at least twice, as I
read it there isn't actually a /formal /commitment to that as a
stabiliz
@listserve1.allegheny.edu
Subject: RE: Copenhagen result
2. on legally binding. You're right of course that international law is weak
in terms of enforcement. But you're wrong that 'many' Annex B countries will
fail to meet their Kyoto targets - the EU will get there ea
I take Wil's "exogenous" comment to mean that the bulk of UK emissions reductions would have occured in the absence of Kyoto.
From: owner-gep...@listserve1.allegheny.edu on behalf of Henrik SelinSent: Sun 12/20/2009 1:11 PMTo: gep-ed@listserve1.allegheny.eduSubject: RE: Copen
2. on legally binding. Youre right of course that international law is
weak in terms of enforcement. But youre wrong that many Annex B
countries will fail to meet their Kyoto targets the EU will get there
easily enough, as will (for hot air reasons) most ex-soviet countries. NZ
still ha
e...@uottawa.ca]
Sent: Sunday, December 20, 2009 8:33 AM
To: williamcgbu...@comcast.net; 'Radoslav Dimitrov'; 'Global Environmental
Politics Education ListServe'
Subject: Re: Copenhagen result
Wil, you raise a lot of issues here, we could end up with a long (and
interestin
'Global Environmental
Politics Education ListServe'
Subject: RE: Copenhagen result
I think amidst all of the (legitimate) gloom about the results at
Copenhagen, we should emphasize a couple of things:
1. It was known well before the meeting that we were likely to only
get a political
I think amidst all of the (legitimate) gloom about the results at
Copenhagen, we should emphasize a couple of things:
1. It was known well before the meeting that we were likely to only
get a political declaration from Copenhagen; in many ways, I think the media
hyped the final stages
26 matches
Mail list logo
