On Mon, 2019-07-29 at 12:12 +0100, Mark Carroll wrote:
> On 29 Jul 2019, David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> > When an individual from a domain which publishes these stupid SPF and
> > similar records saying "only accept mail from my mailserver", posts to
> > the list, and it is rejected by stupidly
On 29 Jul 2019, David Woodhouse wrote:
> When an individual from a domain which publishes these stupid SPF and
> similar records saying "only accept mail from my mailserver", posts to
> the list, and it is rejected by stupidly configured mailservers which
> *honour* that request, that's when
On Sun, 2019-07-28 at 23:02 +0100, George Eycott wrote:
> However, as I understand it, the changes then mean that technically the
> emails being sent by Mailman are not being processed by the list software in
> line with the email standards (in due course I expect the standards will
> need in some
On Sun, 28 Jul 2019 at 12:10, Peter Corlett wrote:
> ...
> I'm sure the list admin(s) will be delighted to receive your remittance to
> cover the cost of the reconfiguration, testing, extra server load, and ongoing
> maintenance required to improve (but not guarantee!) deliverability to GMail.
>
> In contrast, Google have a very strict policy, and expect the rest of the
> Internet to spend a lot of time and money chasing their latest capricious
> changes. This is a full-time job, and unsurprisingly, many people running
mail
> services on the side have better things to do than try and
On 28/07/2019 11:01, Mark Carroll wrote:
On 28 Jul 2019, Bernard Peek wrote:
I've used Gmail for years but I'm happy to use something else. My main
reason for choosing Gmail back then was its spam filtering. What
alternatives can match that today?
I would second the idea of putting gmx.com
Which is why I am not on the get_iplayer forum. It's too much like hard work to
raise a genuine issue without accidentally breaching one or more of his nit
picking rules.
--
Owen Smith
Cambridge, UK
> On 28 Jul 2019, at 11:28, Peter Corlett wrote:
>
> Compare this to the get_iplayer
>
Please see below ...
On 28/07/2019 14:29, Mark Carroll wrote:
On 28 Jul 2019, RS wrote:
One thing that seems to be being suggested is that I should use my own
domain name for email. My own experience of doing that has been that I
get swamped with spam.
I do this. This isn't the place for an
On 28 Jul 2019, RS wrote:
> On 28/07/2019 11:01, Mark Carroll wrote:
>>
>> Standards violations or similar daft decisions by big players are a
>> common issue in IT,
>
> Pious comments about standards violation are not much help unless we can
> identify what the standards are and how they are
On 28/07/2019 11:01, Mark Carroll wrote:
On 28 Jul 2019, Bernard Peek wrote:
I've used Gmail for years but I'm happy to use something else. My main
reason for choosing Gmail back then was its spam filtering. What
alternatives can match that today?
I would second the idea of putting gmx.com at
hello
I just fell victim of this. Too many bounces from Gmail.
No idea why.
SMTP to detailed out in RFC-821
May have to switch back to running my own mail server.
Google is the new evil empire.
On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 6:14 AM Steven Carr wrote:
>
> Anyone else getting kicked from the list?
On 28/07/2019 11:01, Mark Carroll wrote:
Standards violations or similar daft decisions by big players are a
common issue in IT,
Pious comments about standards violation are not much help unless we can
identify what the standards are and how they are being violated.
My (very limited)
On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 09:21:26AM +0100, Colin Law wrote:
[...]
> This is the only list I use that has this shown this issue.
Then you are lucky. I'm on *loads* of mailing lists, and several of them have
had GMail users complaining of missing list posts and being unsubscribed. The
common factor
On 28 Jul 2019, Bernard Peek wrote:
> I've used Gmail for years but I'm happy to use something else. My main
> reason for choosing Gmail back then was its spam filtering. What
> alternatives can match that today?
I would second the idea of putting gmx.com at least on the "to be
considered" list
@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Excessive Bounces
On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 08:32:36PM -0300, david whelan wrote:
> Does anyone know of any free email providers that are suitably
> standards-compliant?
You generally get what you pay for, and that applies in spades when you
demand "free".
How
On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 08:32:36PM -0300, david whelan wrote:
> Does anyone know of any free email providers that are suitably
> standards-compliant?
You generally get what you pay for, and that applies in spades when you demand
"free".
However, ProtonMail is a freemium service which has a good
On Sat, 27 Jul 2019 at 13:03, Roger Bell_West wrote:
>
> In order to participate reliably in Internet email, you'll need a
> standards-compliant platform - which gmail isn't. It's fine if you
> only ever exchange mail with other walled-garden users, but talking to
> the wider world is a bit more
On 2019-07-28 00:36, Kevin McCarthy wrote:
I'm getting an message regarding excessive bounces too without me
posting to the group!
Why the "!"? "Excessive bounces" means that the mail-list server is
regularly failing to send messages TO you, which it will try to do
with every message someone
reassuring to know that I'm not the only person receiving
>the "excessive bounces" message
>
>Regards
>Kevin McCarthy.
>
>-Original Message-
>From: get_iplayer [mailto:get_iplayer-boun...@lists.infradead.org] On
>Behalf Of david whelan
>Sent: 28 July 2019 00:33
>
On Behalf Of
david whelan
Sent: 28 July 2019 00:33
To: get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Excessive Bounces
Does anyone know of any free email providers that are suitably
standards-compliant?
On 2019-07-27 9:03 a.m., Roger Bell_West wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 09:14:40PM +1000
On 27/07/2019 13:03, Roger Bell_West wrote:
On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 09:14:40PM +1000, Steven Carr wrote:
Has an admin (not)updated settings on the list that’s causing GMail to
reject emails? I know on some other lists I’m a member of changes have
had to be made to Mailman due to DKIM/DMARC.
On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 09:14:40PM +1000, Steven Carr wrote:
>Has an admin (not)updated settings on the list that’s causing GMail to
>reject emails? I know on some other lists I’m a member of changes have
>had to be made to Mailman due to DKIM/DMARC.
In order to participate reliably in Internet
Me too - also a very infrequent contributor.
-
Regards,
Paul Thornett
On Sat., 27 Jul. 2019, 21:19 Roger Tricker, wrote:
>
> Yep, me too, although I rarely contribute.
> Roger
>
> On 27/07/2019 12:14, Steven Carr wrote:
> > Anyone else getting kicked from the list? I’ve been
On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 09:14:40PM +1000, Steven Carr wrote:
> Anyone else getting kicked from the list? I’ve been kicked twice now for
> “excessive bounces”.
No, because I'm not using a proprietary webmail platform which won't play
nicely with anything outside of its walled garden.
> Has an
On 27/07/2019 12:30, Alexis Huxley wrote:
me too.
___
get_iplayer mailing list
get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/get_iplayer
Me too
___
get_iplayer mailing list
me too.
___
get_iplayer mailing list
get_iplayer@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/get_iplayer
Me 2. I'm using gmail.
-Original Message-
From: get_iplayer On Behalf Of Steven
Carr
Sent: 27 July 2019 12:15
To: get_iplayer-request
Subject: Excessive Bounces
Anyone else getting kicked from the list? I’ve been kicked twice now for
“excessive bounces”.
Has an admin (not)updated
Yep, me too, although I rarely contribute.
Roger
On 27/07/2019 12:14, Steven Carr wrote:
Anyone else getting kicked from the list? I’ve been kicked twice now
for “excessive bounces”.
Has an admin (not)updated settings on the list that’s causing GMail to
reject emails? I know on some other
28 matches
Mail list logo
