On Tue, Feb 06, 2018 at 05:06:02PM +0100, Cyrille Chépélov wrote:
> Hi Jonas,
>
> responding slightly out of order (both below an inline); plus we've pretty
> much already started to bring this onto the issue tracker where this
> belongs:
Thanks for filing those issues.
>
> > It'd also be good
On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 07:24:46PM +0100, Cyrille Chépélov wrote:
> Hello,
Hi!
>
> first of all, many thanks for the hard work.
Thanks a lot for testing!
>
> I have an Nvidia GeForce 1060 GTX -equipped laptop, which also has a
> perfectly functional and entirely adequate Intel i915-based vide
On Sun, 2013-03-10 at 10:08 +0100, Donato Marrazzo wrote:
> In Files app, there is an "engine wheel" in the top right corner,
> where some options have place, and even there is an arrow button near
> the engine wheel with other option: so you have to remember which
> actions are in the AppMenu, in
In Files app, there is an "engine wheel" in the top right corner, where
some options have place, and even there is an arrow button near the engine
wheel with other option: so you have to remember which actions are in the
AppMenu, in the engine wheel and in the arrow button.
The other problem with A
On Fri, 2013-03-08 at 16:40 +0100, Donato Marrazzo wrote:
> The key aspect is that the AppMenu as it is implemented in Files app
> is not the only place where to look for action/option, so it's
> confusing.
In the Files app? Atleast on my machine, there is no classic menu, so
the AppMenu IS the on
I think that this extension could be convenient, but does not solve the
problem radically.
The key aspect is that the AppMenu as it is implemented in Files app is not
the only place where to look for action/option, so it's confusing.
>From my point of view, the possible solution are:
1) remove it
2
Mon, 2013-02-25 at 10:36 +0100, Donato Marrazzo wrote:
>
> > >Developers have regular meetings on IRC.
> > I expect that IRC channel is for people actively involved in
> > developing and design.
>
> Yes, exactly.
>
> > As "normal" user, I'd lik
On Mon, 2013-02-25 at 10:36 +0100, Donato Marrazzo wrote:
> >Developers have regular meetings on IRC.
> I expect that IRC channel is for people actively involved in
> developing and design.
Yes, exactly.
> As "normal" user, I'd like left an "asynchronous&quo
Hi Adam, thank you for your answers:
> Developers have regular meetings on IRC.
>
> I expect that IRC channel is for people actively involved in developing
and design.
As "normal" user, I'd like left an "asynchronous" feedback... and since it
seems that m
and the maintainer to figure out what the right
> > solution is. It might be the correct solution is remove AppMenu, or
> > perhaps the solution is to fix X11 in some shape way or form.
> there are quite a few bug reports concerning this ... could'nt find
> one with useful devel
On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 11:42 +0100, Donato Marrazzo wrote:
> My feedback is about the current design, let me know if there is
> another place where to share such kind of feedbacks.
Developers have regular meetings on IRC.
___
gnome-shell-list m
On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 12:19 +0100, Donato Marrazzo wrote:
> I understand your pain... but strictly speaking you can switch window
> with just one click: 1) move to active corner 2) pick the window (one
> click)
Alt-Tab, Alt-` work too. Very fast. You even get pretty pictures of
the windows so yo
I understand your pain... but strictly speaking you can switch window with
just one click: 1) move to active corner 2) pick the window (one click)
Anyway, it require 2 mouse trip... and yes it's mouse intensive operation.
However there is an intersting extension called "dash to dock", give it a
try
I completely disagree: cinnamon or kde are just a copy of an old design
with some superficial changes.
Gnome 3 is a radical re-think of human-computer interaction.
I love the activities overview: one place to see open applications and
workspaces, to launch other applications...
Fantastic!
On other
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Donato Marrazzo wrote:
> My feedback is about the current design, let me know if there is another
> place where to share such kind of feedbacks.
> My opinion is that AppMenu initially is charming, something different from
> the old "windows
My feedback is about the current design, let me know if there is another
place where to share such kind of feedbacks.
My opinion is that AppMenu initially is charming, something different from
the old "windows style": but usage experience is uncomfortable!
I like new design idea, but
t might be the correct solution is remove AppMenu, or perhaps
> the solution is to fix X11 in some shape way or form.
>
there are quite a few bug reports concerning this ... could'nt find one
with useful developer feedback (except to enable the fallback mode)
> A lot of people seem th
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 3:47 AM, Donato Marrazzo
wrote:
> Please remove AppMenu!
>
>
If I could make a suggestion. When making such requests, it's best to
simply state the problem and not recommend the solution. I for one am not
so arrogant to know what the solution should be. In this case, th
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 8:37 PM, Sam Bull wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 12:06 +, Gabriel Rossetti wrote:
> > I find the AppMenu counter-productive, confusing (why have menus in
> > two different places?) and it breaks the sloppy mouse focus (you can't
> > access the AppMenu since it changes
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 20:37 +, Sam Bull wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 12:06 +, Gabriel Rossetti wrote:
> > I find the AppMenu counter-productive, confusing (why have menus in
> > two different places?) and it breaks the sloppy mouse focus (you can't
> > access the AppMenu since it changes
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 12:06 +, Gabriel Rossetti wrote:
> I find the AppMenu counter-productive, confusing (why have menus in
> two different places?) and it breaks the sloppy mouse focus (you can't
> access the AppMenu since it changes when the mouse goes over another
> window when you try and
Having global menu commands in a menu in a single place seems to be a great
idea, but the implementation feels a bit off. Maybe it is time to bring
back the style from Windows 3.0 where the app menu was in the top left of
the titlebar?
Does anyone have a link to any archived discussion when the a
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 15:16 +0100, Florian Müllner wrote:
> On Feb 22, 2013 3:13 PM, "Adam Tauno Williams"
> wrote:
> > BTW, is there a hotkey bound to the current applications AppMenu?
> That
> > would make it somewhat less silly.
> f10
Ah! Nice, thanks. Now I can pop the menu and navigate it
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 14:08 +, Gabriel Rossetti wrote:
> Yes, I forgot to mention the multi-monitor thing, you are right. I
> think we should make a list of the pros/cons of it, here is my updated
> list of cons (sorry, I can't find any pros but please fill the list in
> if you have some):
Thi
On Feb 22, 2013 3:13 PM, "Adam Tauno Williams"
wrote:
> BTW, is there a hotkey bound to the current applications AppMenu? That
> would make it somewhat less silly.
f10
___
gnome-shell-list mailing list
gnome-shell-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/
On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 14:41 +0100, Florian Scandella wrote:
> +1 for removing AppMenu, it's very annoying when using multiple monitors.
Agree, I don't get the point in the first place... but with my displays
it is *36 INCHES FROM THE APPLICATION WINDOW*! Yikes.
BTW, is there a hotkey bound to th
nome-shell-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: AppMenu design feedback
+1 for removing AppMenu, it's very annoying when using multiple monitors.
As a temporary workaround theres a gsettings key:
gsettings set org.gnome.settings-daemon.plugins.xsettings overrides
'{"Gtk/ShellShowsAppMenu&
>] on behalf of Donato
> Marrazzo [donato.marra...@gmail.com
> <mailto:donato.marra...@gmail.com>]
> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 11:48
> To: gnome-shell-list@gnome.org <mailto:gnome-shell-list@gnome.org>
> Subject: AppMenu design feedback
>
&g
options :-)
Cheers,
Gabriel
From: Rovanion Luckey [rovanion.luc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 13:01
To: Gabriel Rossetti
Cc: Donato Marrazzo; gnome-shell-list@gnome.org
Subject: Re: AppMenu design feedback
Hi,
Does the extension put the options from the
___
> From: gnome-shell-list [gnome-shell-list-boun...@gnome.org] on behalf of
> Donato Marrazzo [donato.marra...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 11:48
> To: gnome-shell-list@gnome.org
> Subject: AppMenu design feedback
>
> Hi All,
>
> Fi
nd I will announce
when it is fixed, hopefully soon.
Cheers,
Gabriel
From: gnome-shell-list [gnome-shell-list-boun...@gnome.org] on behalf of Donato
Marrazzo [donato.marra...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 11:48
To: gnome-shell-list@gnome.org
Subjec
Hi All,
Files 3.6 is the first app that I use which leverage AppMenu design.
I feel a bit confused because I don't know where to search an option: every
time I check the "engine wheel" that is near the mouse then I remember the
AppMenu!!!
I think that AppMenu is not a graet design for the followin
guess i am going to cancel this mailing list, as it seems it is not
meant for users who want to give feedback. i gave gnome 3.2 a try, due
to switching a faulty boot ssd... i knew that if i want to use it it
wont be an easy task to get all the stuff running as i like it. as i
wrote on this
Am 19.08.2011 16:28, schrieb Federico Mena Quintero:
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 22:07 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 09:47:26PM +0200, Rovanion Luckey wrote:
"It" already works, there is no dark magic behind having a visible Power Off
button. The Gnome Shell UI however seems to w
On Thu, 2011-08-18 at 22:07 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 09:47:26PM +0200, Rovanion Luckey wrote:
> > "It" already works, there is no dark magic behind having a visible Power Off
> > button. The Gnome Shell UI however seems to wish it could communicate that
> > the user has
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 09:47:26PM +0200, Rovanion Luckey wrote:
> Making it work for the most of your users? Tell me how did you determine
> that the larger part of your users *exclusively* use suspend.
This was already explained, I am not going to repeat.
> "It" already works, there is no dark
2011/8/18 Olav Vitters
> It is not about individual people, just trying to determine what is best
> for most. This was explained by a designer at the Desktop Summit. First
> make it work for most, then try and figure out how to make it work for
> the rest + "long tail".
>
Making it work for the
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:17:46PM +0200, Wouter De Borger wrote:
> Third: I hate the way you paternalize me. I acknowledge the fact that you
> are infinitely superior to me as UI designers. Really, I suck, you rule. But
?!?
It is not about individual people, just trying to determine what is best
common task. And while the javascript integration allows
unprecedented power for customization, the current design makes small
customizations very hard.
I hope I didn't hurt any feelings. I really appreciate the work you do. I
tried to express my discomfort as well and polite as I could. I hope this
fee
i really would appreciate some kind of input how i can get my alt key
back meanwhile i found the keyboard layout settings, tough i cant
find an option that frees the alt keythanks in advance.phil
On 05/06/2011 09:18 PM, philip ballinger wrote:
hi all,
gnome3 is starting to work ou
hi all,
gnome3 is starting to work out for me. nice job! i do 3d and composite
for a living and will, at some point i will migrate to gnome 3 on my
workstation. right now its on my office/testing pc. ill keep it short
and just list a few things i miss or still need.
wish list:
cpu / weather
The specification that applications have to support is called
startup-notification.
http://standards.freedesktop.org/startup-notification-spec/startup-notification-latest.txt
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Adam Tauno Williams
wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 15:11 +0200, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 15:11 +0200, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
> Le jeudi 05 mai 2011 à 09:00 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams a écrit :
> > Huh. Should that work? I'm in the activity view, so I see the tiled
> > apps of the current workstation, the left hand applications bar [what is
> > the official n
Le jeudi 05 mai 2011 à 09:00 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams a écrit :
> Huh. Should that work? I'm in the activity view, so I see the tiled
> apps of the current workstation, the left hand applications bar [what is
> the official name of that thing] and on the right hand the tiled
> workspaces. I gr
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 08:41 +0200, Frederik Hertzum wrote:
> tir, 03 05 2011 kl. 16:28 -0430, skrev Dokuro:
> > On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Frederik Hertzum
> > wrote:
> > >
> >
> > Horizontal desktops missing:
> >
> > > ==
> tir, 03 05 2011 kl. 16:28 -0430, skrev Dokuro:
> > so grabbing the app icon and moving it to the workspace you want and
> > then using ctrl+alt+up/down does not work for you, because you need
> > more rows in order to navigate them easier?
Huh. Should that work? I'm in the activity view, so I
tir, 03 05 2011 kl. 16:28 -0430, skrev Dokuro:
> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Frederik Hertzum
> wrote:
> >
>
> Horizontal desktops missing:
>
> > =
> >
> >>ctrl+alt+up/down to change workspaces (virt desktops)
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Frederik Hertzum
wrote:
>
Horizontal desktops missing:
> =
>
>>ctrl+alt+up/down to change workspaces (virt desktops)
> That key-combo (or any other for that matter) doesn't allow me
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 10:28 +0800, Allan E. Registos wrote:
> >If I'm powering off it's because I'm unplugging the computer. If I'm
> rebooting it's to update to the new kernel. The, what I that was a
> lack, of >other options was annoying.
>
> This is one of the reasons why the GNOME Shell was
h> wrote:
>
>
> >- Original Message -
> >From: "G. Michael Carter"
> >To: "Adam Williamson"
> >Cc: "gnome-shell-list"
> >Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2011 10:17:58 AM
> >Subject: Re: Feedback
> >
> >
> >If I'm
>- Original Message -
>From: "G. Michael Carter"
>To: "Adam Williamson"
>Cc: "gnome-shell-list"
>Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2011 10:17:58 AM
>Subject: Re: Feedback
>
>
>If I'm powering off it's because I'm unpluggin
If I'm powering off it's because I'm unplugging the computer. If I'm
rebooting it's to update to the new kernel. The, what I that was a lack, of
other options was annoying.
But the ALT key works for me. Are these tips posted somewhere? Guess I
should have looked at the help maybe ;)
On Mon
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 20:49 -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Allan E. Registos
> wrote:
> On Saturday, 30 April, 2011 09:40 PM, Jasper St. Pierre
> wrote:
> > == Suspend instead of Shutdown ==
> >
>
On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 09:40 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> It should only be a default if we detect you computer can support it.
>
> Can you give us some hardware details, and try:
>
> pm-utils --suspend && echo "Supported" || echo "Not supported"
>
> in a terminal?
I hope you realize thi
On Monday, 02 May, 2011 11:49 AM, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
I guess they do not want to listen as I recall.
Well, I wouldn't say that.. I'm sure there at least in Fedora that the
distros will be trying to get suspend working. Suspend has to work.
It needs to be exactly like the Mac. My
>>>
>>> Horizontal desktops missing:
>>>
=
>ctrl+alt+up/down to change workspaces (virt desktops)
That key-combo (or any other for that matter) doesn't allow me to do
what I want. I often need more than one set of apps open, whic
I apologize, I messed it up entirely.
pm-is-supported --suspend && echo "Not supported" || echo "Supported"
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Bidossessi SODONON <
bidossessi.sodo...@yahoo.fr> wrote:
> Actually that command gives "Not supported" on my laptop, which doesn't
> stop me from suspend
Actually that command gives "Not supported" on my laptop, which doesn't
stop me from suspending and resuming without hiccups. Curious.
___
gnome-shell-list mailing list
gnome-shell-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-shell-list
Whoops. I meant 'pm-is-supported', I was just being an idiot when I wrote
the email. I'm also even more of an idiot and got the exit statuses
reversed:
pm-is-supported --suspend && echo "Not Supported" || echo "Supported"
pm-utils is the package that has all this stuff:
http://cgit.freedesktop.
On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 23:40 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> I'm not suggesting the Terminal for everyday usage. I'm just trying to
> get some hardware and pm-utils stats so we can solve the problem for
> other users... all that command will do is print out "Supported" or
> "Not Supported", just a
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Allan E. Registos <
allan.regis...@smpc.steniel.com.ph> wrote:
> On Saturday, 30 April, 2011 09:40 PM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
>
> == Suspend instead of Shutdown ==
>>
>> Surely this has been discussed extensively, I just want to mention that
>> suspend si
I'm not suggesting the Terminal for everyday usage. I'm just trying to get
some hardware and pm-utils stats so we can solve the problem for other
users... all that command will do is print out "Supported" or "Not
Supported", just as a starting point for the hellish journey ahead of us:
Debugging Li
On Saturday, 30 April, 2011 09:40 PM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
== Suspend instead of Shutdown ==
Surely this has been discussed extensively, I just want to mention
that suspend simply does not work for me (tested on two computers,
both do not wake up correctly).
I gues
On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 12:07 -0400, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> There's a gradient background for apps that are running.
Wow! I can see it now that you mention it [ for someone with impaired
color perception it doesn't really jump out and slap me ].
Thanks, I was just wondering about that.
__
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Jasper St. Pierre
wrote:
> There's a gradient background for apps that are running.
I always though it was a bit too subtle, I hope it can evolve in
something more obvious for 3.2
--
Gianluca Sforna
http://morefedora.blogspot.com
http://identi.ca/giallu - http
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Jasper St. Pierre
wrote:
> You can use the dash to switch between running applications too! I'm not
> sure why, but most people don't discover this...
I believe it's some kind of muscle memory. The dash reminds a lot the
old panels, and the buttons in the old pane
There's a gradient background for apps that are running.
Look at gnome-terminal vs. Brasero in the mockup:
http://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-shell-design/plain/mockups/static/overview-application-picker.png
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 6:40 AM, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
>
> == Switching Applications ==
>>
>> Before actually testing Gnome Shell in "production use" with many open
>> windows, I had imagined that switching applications in the expose view would
>> work a bit faster and more efficient. W
It should only be a default if we detect you computer can support it.
Can you give us some hardware details, and try:
pm-utils --suspend && echo "Supported" || echo "Not supported"
in a terminal?
% /usr/bin/pm-is-supported --suspend && echo "Supported" || echo "Not
supported"
=> Suppor
On sab, 2011-04-30 at 15:12 +0200, Marc Fouquet wrote:
> After installing Ubuntu Natty with Gnome Shell from the PPA and using it
> for a few hours, I also want to give some feedback.
> == Switching Applications ==
>
> Before actually testing Gnome Shell in "produ
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 9:12 AM, Marc Fouquet wrote:
> After installing Ubuntu Natty with Gnome Shell from the PPA and using it
> for a few hours, I also want to give some feedback.
>
> First of all Gnome Shell appears conceptually nice and consistent (this is
> my main criticism
After installing Ubuntu Natty with Gnome Shell from the PPA and using it
for a few hours, I also want to give some feedback.
First of all Gnome Shell appears conceptually nice and consistent (this
is my main criticism regarding Unity, which is inconsistent and buggy in
many places). I am not
>>>
>>> Horizontal desktops missing:
>>> =
>
>>
>> I'm really confused at what you mean by this. Why do you feel you need
>> horizontal workspaces?
>>
> I would really like to have related workspaces grouped in some way --
> for e
2011/4/29 Jasper St. Pierre :
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Frederik Hertzum
>
> Just for clarification, "desktop" means "workspace"?
Yes: I was thinking in the term "virtual desktop".
>
>
>
>>
>> Maximized windows and title bars:
>>
>
>
11-February/msg00192.html
>
> =
>
> I think it's important for people to know a bit about how I use my
> computer if they are to get anything out of reading my feedback -- so
> here goes:
>
> I am a CS student who frequently use SSH from ter
about how I use my
computer if they are to get anything out of reading my feedback -- so
here goes:
I am a CS student who frequently use SSH from terminals while reading
junk in Firefox or epiphany and having several editors open (either
gedit or anjuta) and compiling stuff in more terminals and ta
On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Christoph Hack wrote:
> Dear Gnome Shell Team!
>
> I started trying out gnome-shell via jhbuild the day before yesterday
> and I am deeply impressed! Well done!
>
> The things I like most are the new automatic workspace management, the
> notification system, the m
Dear Gnome Shell Team!
I started trying out gnome-shell via jhbuild the day before yesterday
and I am deeply impressed! Well done!
The things I like most are the new automatic workspace management, the
notification system, the maximize (half) function per DnD, single
instances per default and a
Hi.
First of all: thanks for the feedback.
Most of your points are design questions, so I am not the most qualified
person to answer them.
El sáb, 19-06-2010 a las 13:18 +0200, Niels L. Ellegaard escribió:
> It would be nice to have a simple and visible way to disable
> gnome-shell anim
Johannes Schmid writes:
> (Note: I am not a gnome-shell developer, I hope those will also answer
> because I think you make some interesting points)
They are probably busy coding, so I submitted some bug reports instead.
>> It would be nice to have more meta data describing each program. If I
>
Hi!
(Note: I am not a gnome-shell developer, I hope those will also answer
because I think you make some interesting points)
> It would be nice to have a simple and visible way to disable
> gnome-shell animations. Perhaps the animations should be disabled by
> default.
Well, besides the fade in/
Johannes Schmid writes:
> Am Freitag, den 18.06.2010, 13:03 +0200 schrieb Niels L. Ellegaard:
>> Today I made gnome-shell work for the first time, and I have spend a few
>> hours toying around in gnome-shell 2.29.0-3 on Debian. It looks shiny,
>> but I also discovered some problems. I don't know
Hi!
Am Freitag, den 18.06.2010, 13:03 +0200 schrieb Niels L. Ellegaard:
> Today I made gnome-shell work for the first time, and I have spend a few
> hours toying around in gnome-shell 2.29.0-3 on Debian. It looks shiny,
> but I also discovered some problems. I don't know how many of these are
> fi
Omer Akram writes:
> The menu in the upper right corner has my name as a title. That makes it
> difficult for me to search for help on google and in the gnome help
> system. If I type my name in to google I don't get help on the
> gnome-shell menu system.
>
>
> Its the name of the
>
> If the activities menu is open I cannot open the menu in the upper right
> corner. Ideally opening one menu should close the other.
>
Last I tried gnome shell I was able to click my name in the overlay made so
I guess the same will happen for system indicators too.
> If the activities menu i
Today I made gnome-shell work for the first time, and I have spend a few
hours toying around in gnome-shell 2.29.0-3 on Debian. It looks shiny,
but I also discovered some problems. I don't know how many of these are
fixed in the newest version of gnome-shell, so feel free to ignore
selectively.
I
Hello.
After using gnome-shell for a few days I think it's great!
And as there always is something to improve I would like to share some
observations.
1. Right click menus are hardly discoverable. I had no clue how to add
apps to favourites until I read cheat sheet. I even resorted to editing
GC
I love gnome shell i just have a few suggestions.
1) The (-) sign in the window shots should be easier to read. I couldn't see
it at all at first.
2)The (+) sign is great minimalist but prominent. That could be replicated
the same size in the side panel with a spanner sign the same style which
wo
I just reread what you meant by #2, if you had a custom launcher on
the panel have a look in the folder .gnome2/panel2.d/default/launchers
for now
2010/1/7 Bob Hazard :
> Instead of right-clicking for #1 you can also drag and drop the icon
> on to the workspace to launch a new instance
>
> I think
Instead of right-clicking for #1 you can also drag and drop the icon
on to the workspace to launch a new instance
I think the favourites area of the overview is supposed to replace the
panel shortcuts, you can add to favourites with dnd.
2010/1/7 nodata :
> Some thoughts after testing gnome-shell
Some thoughts after testing gnome-shell-2.28.0-3.fc12 for two days.
I really really like using gnome-shell for switching applications and
would be happy to use it for just that.
I made a few notes specific to the way I use gnome.
1. Make it easy to launch a new instance of an application
I u
Friends--
I've been using gnome-shell for a couple months now (and computers for
almost 30 years) and there are a couple things I hope you adjust as
you go along.
First of all I am a generalizing thinker. It occurs to me that the
Activities overlay is like nothing so much as the XP Start Menu.
On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 20:42 +0100, Jimmy Forrester-Fellowes wrote:
> Hey all,
> My second issue was after using gnome-shell for a couple of hours,
> although it seemed very stable i experienced serious slow down the
> more i used it. It looked like mutter might have been leaking as it
> was consum
gnome shell a bit of time today, I've been tuned in to this
mailing list for some time and previously built the project a few times
out of curiosity. Today I spent a couple of hours using it and wanted
to share my feedback:
The main issue I found was that I couldn't easily keep tra
Hey all,
I gave gnome shell a bit of time today, I've been tuned in to this mailing
list for some time and previously built the project a few times out of
curiosity. Today I spent a couple of hours using it and wanted to share my
feedback:
The main issue I found was that I couldn't e
95 matches
Mail list logo
