Hii Jyoti,
Thankx for ur reply...
Now its working fine
There was some proxy issues thats why it was giving problem..
On Feb 24, 9:47 pm, Jyoti Shete-Javadekar jyoti.javade...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Sunita,
There could be issues with your app.yaml. Could you please check if your
have
How can '...An application operating entirely within the free quotas
can process around 30 active dynamic requests at any given moment...'
if maximum rate for CPU time within free default quota is 15 CPU-min/
min ? Should you correct that statement to 15 active dynamic
requests ?
Pozdrav,
Are you doing anything other than parsing the XML? Also, how big is the Atom
feed? 10MB?
Also, are you using a DOM parser or stream based? Stream based will be a bit
faster.
Finally, how long does it take you to parse, say, 100 Atom entries using
your code? I would expect the time to be on
Perhaps you could consider using memcache API instead of Datastore property.
Just my 2 cents.
-- Takashi Matsuo
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Brandon Thomson
brandon.j.thom...@gmail.com wrote:
One way is to store a lastSeen datetime property for each user in
some kind of user entity in
There is a cap at 3 Request per Second. well I surely know that ,
flikr,facebook,youtube or any big out there is getting more hits than
that...
so possibility of making some next generation supercool site only on
google app engine is impossible ??
{ yeh , i know , the chances that my
Thank you Marzia, not sure how I could have missed that news. Great
Work on adding the billing option
On Feb 24, 4:12 pm, Marzia Niccolai ma...@google.com wrote:
Hi,
If you exceed datastore quota, you won't stop serving, but won't be able to
modify any data in the datastore.
Today,
On Feb 24, 4:43 pm, Sylvain sylvain.viv...@gmail.com wrote:
Nobody can help ?
In the Arguments tab there is Working directory (at the bottom).
Choose Other and click on Workspace and select your project.
Bye,
Waldemar Kornewald
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
Thank you very much, now it works.
FYI, I had to set this value : ${workspace_loc:app-engine-patch/src}
Maybe you could had this info to the documentation.
Great job !
On Feb 25, 3:08 pm, Waldemar Kornewald wkornew...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 24, 4:43 pm, Sylvain sylvain.viv...@gmail.com
Hi Matija,
The per-minute CPU limit is independent of the number of active
requests you can run. Let's assume your requests were taking on
average 200ms of CPU time and completed in 200ms wall clock time, to
keep things simple. There are at least three limits that come into
play here.
We are currently hosting KML data to be fetched by GeoXml() requests
to our GAE API. The data is purchased from a third-party vendor and
one of their restrictions requires us to keep our polygon vertices
hidden. We've been doing this by restricting these specific requests
by IP address and
On Feb 24, 5:57 pm, Brandon Thomson gra...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone seen a cost comparison between Google and the other
providers based on these new changes?
EC2 free storage: none
EC2 free CPU: none
you do the math.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this
hi peter
is the per-minute CPU Time quota expandable with the new billing
options?
brian
On Feb 25, 9:39 am, Pete Koomen pkoo...@google.com wrote:
Hi Matija,
The per-minute CPU limit is independent of the number of active
requests you can run. Let's assume your requests were taking on
Don't compare apples to oranges, EC2 is complete operating system
instance.
On 25 Lut, 16:39, Wooble geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 24, 5:57 pm, Brandon Thomson gra...@gmail.com wrote:
Has anyone seen a cost comparison between Google and the other
providers based on these new changes?
I am watching your changes in the quota system from the perspective of
wanting to run massive parallel applications on it. Considered that
way, the changes are a definite improvement, though not quite to the
point where it would be worth it for us. In particular, if I read
your docs right, one
Maybe I'm misunderstanding you, but since when was it free to run a
EC2 instance?
EC2 Small Instance per CPU Hour is $0.10 (same as GAE's cost 'per CPU
hour')
EC2 outgoing bandwidth is $0.17 per GB for the first Terabyte out. S3
outgoing bandwidth is the same cost for the first 10TB out. GAE is
Do I read this correctly? There is a reduction and it is as follows?
CPU
current quota - 46 hours
new quota - 6.5 hours
% change - 86% reduction
Bandwidth
current quota - 10GB
new quota - 1 GB
% change - 90% reduction
Here's what's confusing. There is the following statement. Note the
On Feb 25, 11:11 am, mchirico mchir...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's what's confusing. There is the following statement. Note the
phrase applications with billing enabled will not be affected:
These changes may also affect the fixed quotas applied to
applications without billing enabled. Fixed
Thanks for the feedback.
The Atom file is typically small ~100KB.
I am using both minidom (for extracting entities) and BeautifulSoup
(to extract properties from entries).
Which XML parser do you recommend? I'm a just starting with Python.
What is the fastest setup to fetch and parse Atom
hello all,
i just develope an application in that i set up sendmail
application ,now i want to check from my local host
Through GAE i learned dev.appserver.py --enable sendmail /
application when i start my app in my local host
and in my coding i did :
def
This change could lead to significant cost changes, too:
46 hours (current) - 6.5 hours (new) = 39.5 hours/day difference *
$0.10/hour * 365 days/year = $1441.75/year
10 GB (current) - 1GB (new) = 9GB/day difference * .10 * 365 = $328/
year
These are worst case scenarios in many ways. Still,
I don't know that I have ever whined at an organization like Google
for trying to make money.
That's changing with this message.
By my calculations, it could cost me $1000 over the next year to host
my app that I had anticipated being hosted under the quotas. It may
cost me nothing right
It looks like the accountants at Google have taken over If you
read over the new bandwidth quotes you will find that what was to be
scalable is not so anymore:
Outgoing Bandwidth (adjustable, includes HTTPS) 10 GByte56
MByte/
min 10 GByte free (plus budgeted adjustment
when I use:
from xml.dom import minidom
errors:
xml undefined, parseString undefined
type 'exceptions.ImportError': No module named dom.minidom
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine
hi all
i am new to Google app engine
i have many questions to ask
i need answers as fast as u can
1. how to extract data from app engine datastore. i inserted some data
through my application now i want a dump of that, how is it possible ?
2. i have some data and i need to insert that data into
* Bandwidth: 1 Gigabyte of data transferred in and out of the
application per day
56 MByte/min 740 MByte/min
This is a joke.
On Feb 24, 5:56 pm, theillustratedlife toonscr...@nvbell.net wrote:
Typo on my part. Thanks for the catch. =)
Revised changes:
CPU
current quota - 46 hours
What are your requirements?
If you want media or large-file hosting..perhaps you could use
amazon's s3 to host your static files to overcome any bandwidth
limitations on GAE's end (if you need more than 740MB per minute)? I'm
assuming Amazon doesn't have rate limits or absolute bandwidth usage
I am somewhat annoyed they did not start off with the smaller quotas
but it can't be helped at this point. If App Engine doesn't become
profitable Google corporate will shut it down and then we will all be
hosed.
On Feb 24, 9:12 pm, B.J. bjp...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know that I have ever
Thanks for your replies.
On 24 Feb., 20:02, theillustratedlife toonscr...@nvbell.net wrote:
Don't type the ReferenceProperty.
You mean subclassing the ReferenceProperty? I don't want to do that.
Otherwise, I don't understand what you mean...
You've got to be careful though. If you have A
Is 'img_folder' a static file? If so, you can't access it directly
using 'open'.
For efficiency, App Engine stores and serves static files separately
from application files. Static files are not available in the
application's file system. If you have data files that need to be read
by the
However, along with many performance improvements, we have learned
that we were overly conservative with our initial free quota
estimates. Therefore, 90 days after February 24th, 2009, we will be
reducing the free quota resources.
Bait and Switch. I guess it is legal since all you invested
So why bother with App Engine at all. In so many ways it is s
limited. Just move the whole lot to Amazon! I think App Engine is
destined to become Google's Edsel.
On Feb 25, 9:36 am, peterk peter.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
What are your requirements?
If you want media or large-file
Note: CPU time is charged at a rate of $0.10 per *hour*--time is
measured by the second, and we round up to the nearest cent, so using
30 minutes of usage beyond the free threshold on a given day would
cost $0.05 :)
Pete
On Feb 25, 8:05 am, Mike tutu...@gmail.com wrote:
I am watching your
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 8:09 AM, peterk peter.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe I'm misunderstanding you, but since when was it free to run a
EC2 instance?
EC2 Small Instance per CPU Hour is $0.10 (same as GAE's cost 'per CPU
hour')
EC2 outgoing bandwidth is $0.17 per GB for the first Terabyte
Hi Peter,
I understand that 30 active simultaneous limit is only for free quota
apps and I have already enabled billing.
Let's forget for now about request/min quota. Point is that 'free'
apps could have for half minute long up to 30 000ms/sec burst rate (30
active dynamic requests), but next
app id: ecoknowmics
thanks, Jeff.
On Feb 24, 10:14 am, Jeff S j...@google.com wrote:
Hi Ed,
This is a known issue which has effected a small number of apps. Could
you email me the app id for this application?
Thank you,
Jeff
On Feb 23, 8:53 am, Ed edgam...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks,
I am not sure that this is an GAE issue.
I saved our code on my computer and I can see that when running in the
dev server that you get an http 200 on the get for the xml document.
I do not *think* that XML docemnts have an innerHTML property, so I
think that you just need to handel the XML
Thanks Bill. This was very helpful.
I ran into a problem where I cannot use the remote api when I
authenticate using a hosted google account. You have to use gmail.com
account. Has anyone else experienced this? Does this have something
to do with the AUTH_DOMAIN and USER_EMAIL environment
I'm trying to switch from Komodo to NetBeans and I'm stuck on one
annoying problem. I can't seem to get NetBeans to recognize the GAE
library module. I copied it out of the GAE bundle (as I did before for
Komodo) and added it to the Python path in NetBeans, to no avail.
Has anyone been able to
I have an app that loops over a list of URLs and makes a urlfetch to
each. On the dev server all goes well; I get a 200 response as
expected. On appengine I get a 400 error (bad request). Is this
something to do with different headers being sent from appengine (and
if so what are they), or
On Feb 26, 2:40 am, PYD p...@pydelens.be wrote:
server was negative. Then I remebered I read somewhere that Google
Engine couldn't serve Ajax.
AJAX is just javascript content. There are no specific limitations
for AJAX on Appengine, except for the limitations on content
generally: 1 GB
B.J. wrote:
By my calculations, it could cost me $1000 over the next year to host
my app that I had anticipated being hosted under the quotas. It may
cost me nothing right now our usage is just under the daily CPU
limits. If the traffic doesn't grow, no problem But whose goal is it
Hi. I have observed a sporadic Unicode related bug that appears to be
browser specific. It causes a db.put() to fail. I am not doing
anything unusual with the incoming text except to put it in a
variable, and then store in a record. I have determined that this
issue is browser specific, and
At work, a run of our primary app occupies 1400 cores (700 real
cores?) for several hours. So, I might estimate that that'd cost
something like $200 per run. Not negligible, given that the hardware
cost is already partly sunk. Like I said, I know this isn't Google's
goal necessarily, but it
I agree except for the part about DOS attacks. As far as I can tell
they will just cost you a lot of money unless you actively detect and
block them, and even then there could be cost involved.
On Feb 25, 4:24 pm, Greg g.fawc...@gmail.com wrote:
My feeling is that many people see GAE as
Hey Brian, I am trying to deal with a similar situation in my app. I
would love it if someone offered a good general solution for dealing
with unexpected non-UTF-8 data in a string. There must be a way
because my web browsers can display the data without crashing! =)
The admittedly poor
How many URLs are you fetching. It could be that you are running out
of time on the appengine where each request is limited to 30 seconds.
What do you see in the appengine logs?
Lenza
blog.lenza.org
On Feb 25, 10:04 am, mmauctiva mmann...@auctiva.com wrote:
I have an app that loops over a
If the data comes from any form in your application, you can force
encoding of form data using accept-charset attribute of form element
(see http://www.w3schools.com/tags/att_form_accept_charset.asp).
On 25 Lut, 22:17, Brian bsmcconn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi. I have observed a sporadic Unicode
The last official word on DOS attacks, from Marzia Niccolai, back in
September last year:
On the broader issue of denial-of-service attacks, these are an
unfortunate reality in the web world. While we don't currently offer
applications any specific protections against attacks of this nature,
This will not work as expected, for many reasons.
The line value = unicode(value) will break with UnicodeEncodeError
(not Decode) if the value is unicode object and value contains
characters from outside ASCII range.
The line unicode(str(value).encode('string_escape')) can be
translated to
Hello everyone,
Play the wikipedia game at
http://www.wikiaata.com
The app is powered by AppEngine and GWT was used for building the UI.
Any feedback is very welcome.
Cheers.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Hi everyone,
I've got a site right now that I plan to have coded all in Python (and
Javascript, Css, etc.), hosted on a shared hosting account. It hasn't
been released yet (it's not even finished), so should I migrate it to
App Engine?
As far as I know, I won't come close to the free quotas, so
hey all. Although my app is far from complete, I thought Id do a
little early 'load testing' to see what it would look like.
I had noticed awful big cpu usage times, usually anywhere between
1100ms to 5000ms on my / page ! ... After some memcaching (I had
absolutely none before that), I was able
Depends on the site. If it is likely to hit the big time, GAE will
repay the pain of redeveloping (getting used to the datastore, mainly)
many times over. And if you aren't a sysadmin, GAE will let you sleep
at night. If it does crash (and I'm sure it will, occasionally) you
can sit back and let
Thanks for following through on this, Marzia! That makes a lot more
sense. I really appreciate the diagnosis; you rock!
bFlood, I think the only reason that handler is getting mauled is
because of the 1200ms+ startup costs for initializing a new instance.
Because it's the same handler, the
how can I compare the time stamp information that's stored as a string
with a timestamp that's a datetime object stored through app engine?
timestring = self.request.get('timestamp')
timestring = timestring[0: timestring.find(.)];
timeformat = %Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S
newtime =
I'm getting a Server Error message from the dashboard, when I go
into the Data Viewer and select TiwiNotes (one of my data
entities).
I've had the data in the data store for a couple of months.
I just purchased the pay for higher quotas, and was getting ready to
run another benchmark by deleting
I have also written a little about testing techniques for the Google
App Engine. My stuff is not finished yet, but it may be of some help.
http://code.google.com/p/gawsh/wiki/TestingAppComponents
http://code.google.com/p/gawsh/wiki/TestingTechniques
If that helps, please let me know. If you
I'm not saying you shouldn't be complainin, because lots of us were
surprised by the new official quota numbers and the new accounting, but I
will say that you certainly undertook a big risk by investing in a
technology as new and raw as app engine. Given the limitations and concerns
in your
Agreed. As I said, Shame on me.
On Feb 25, 10:27 pm, Josh Cronemeyer joshuacroneme...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm not saying you shouldn't be complainin, because lots of us were
surprised by the new official quota numbers and the new accounting, but I
will say that you certainly undertook a big
well not exactly what i was looking for ... but cool enough. to
note..
http://code.google.com/appengine/articles/hooks.html
On Feb 24, 5:51 pm, gops patelgo...@gmail.com wrote:
i really like it , if google group allow to edit post within 30
minutes of its posting...so that we can correct
Huh. You sound like my Google-hating dad, saying, 'I drink the Google
kool-aid'.
But I'm not using my own servers. I'm hosting with another company
(called Lunarpages). There isn't much code to convert, and, for
safety, I'd probably try to keep up a standard-python copy, just in
case.
One big
This a big problem!
You have to think about the risk if you use it in your business.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to
62 matches
Mail list logo
