If you used numeric keys then you can do pagination by key in order to get
all items from the datastore and count them. Basically this involves
querying the datastore several times, each time filtering on keys that are
greater than the highest key from the results of the previous query. You
won't
Hi
When I save a model with (key_name=...) value, the key does not seem
to have an id.
Eg.
Mode1(key_name='xxx').put()
obj.key().id() - None
Model2()
obj2.key().id() - 1
Is this intented?
Can I have both key_name and id in a mode?
--
Ritesh
http://www.riteshn.com
Ritesh,
Keys can either have a numeric id or a key_name. In order to access the key
name for entities that you saved with a key_name you need to use the
key_name() method.
instead of obj.key().id(), try obj.key().name()
Incedentally you can also use obj.key().id_or_name() to get either the id
Ritesh,
Also, BTW, The reason that obj1 and obj2 can have different types of keys is
because the key is not saved on a model level. It is saved at the entity
level. Each entity can have id or key_names.
Apparently obj2 was saved without a key name and was given a numeric key.
obj1 was saved with
I created a settings.py file and added the INSTALLED APPS but nothing
helps. (the error, btw, is TemplateSyntaxError: 'humanize' is not a
valid tag library: Could not load template library from
django.templatetags.humanize, No module named humanize). Remember,
I'm not using Django; just the
Has the delete function of records in the datastore started to take
much longer time? One Ajax call I have that deletes up to 20 records
often (more often than not perhaps) takes a very long time, where a
single request consumes around 8000cpu_ms and around 8000api_cpu_ms.
The records deleted
Actually, what I meant was:
I cannot have an entity with both key_name and id.
They seem to be mutually exclusive for an entity.
2009/6/23 Ian Lewis ianmle...@gmail.com:
Ritesh,
Also, BTW, The reason that obj1 and obj2 can have different types of keys is
because the key is not saved on a
Yes, that is correct.
2009/6/24 Ritesh Nadhani rite...@gmail.com
Actually, what I meant was:
I cannot have an entity with both key_name and id.
They seem to be mutually exclusive for an entity.
2009/6/23 Ian Lewis ianmle...@gmail.com:
Ritesh,
Also, BTW, The reason that obj1 and
Thanks for all the responses.
I'll use Ian's first suggestion on Product, ProductIndex until
key_only query issue is resolved.
How do I change my bulkloader to update the Product and ProductIndex
on one upload?
class ProductLoader(bulkloader.Loader):
def __init__(self):
Hi Kim,
Can you please provide your app ID?
Also, how are you accessing your app? Only via appspot.com, or also via a
Google Apps domain you've mapped to the app? The more details you can
provide about your load testing - especially the actual code - the easier
this will be to diagnose.
-Nick
Hi ogterran,
You'll need to define a custom handle_entity function for your loader class.
This function can return multiple ProductIndex entities in addition to the
Product entity being loaded. See the docstring for details:
Hi Anders,
How are you deleting the entities? Are you fetching them first, or deleting
them by providing the keys? And are you deleting them in a single batch, or
one at a time?
-Nick Johnson
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Anders i...@blabline.com wrote:
Has the delete function of records
2009/6/24 Ian Lewis ianmle...@gmail.com
If you used numeric keys then you can do pagination by key in order to get
all items from the datastore and count them. Basically this involves
querying the datastore several times, each time filtering on keys that are
greater than the highest key from
Hi Matt,
There are two separate issues here:
1. Moving the 'ownership' of the app to your company account
2. Changing authentication settings.
For part 1, this is simple: Add the company account as an administrator of
the app, then log in using that account, and remove your personal account as
Hi Mariano,
Yes, static files are included in your daily traffic quota. Bear in mind
that although App Engine does not provide last-modified or etag headers, it
does set Cache-Control and Expires headers, and you can control the
expiration time in app.yaml, so browsers should not re-request
First I get the entities using a query, something like:
entities = entity.Entity.gql('WHERE account_key = :1 AND topic = :2
ORDER BY message_count DESC LIMIT 20', account_key, topic)
Then a loop calling delete() on each entity:
for entity in entities:
entity.delete()
On Jun 24, 12:29 pm,
2009/6/24 Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com
Pagination by key works regardless of if you're using key names or IDs.
Good to know. Sorry about the misinformation. I had forgotten that entities
are ordered in the datastore by their key.
BTW, here is an article in the documentation
Hi Jesse,
It sometimes takes a while for new entity types to be reflected in the Admin
Console. Are the entities showing up now?
-Nick Johnson
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Jesse Grosjean je...@hogbaysoftware.comwrote:
Have you added any Body entities to your datastore? Sometimes I get
Hi Anders,
You don't actually need the entities in order to delete them - only their
keys. Also, you can do all the deletes in a single batch operation. This
ought to be substantially faster:
db.delete(db.GqlQuery(SELECT __key__ FROM Entity WHERE account_key = :1 AND
topic = :2 ORDER BY
Hi djidjadji,
This will be less efficient than simply calling .count() on the collection
property, which doesn't require fetching the keys at all.
-Nick Johnson
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 8:04 PM, djidjadji djidja...@gmail.com wrote:
You can construct a __key__ only query and count them up.
Hi stelg,
All App Engine accounts are Google accounts, and vice-versa. There's no such
thing as an account just for App Engine, or just for GMail.
What I'm asking is if your 'account X' is an account at a domain that is not
gmail.com or googlemail.com.
This is more easily solved if you can tell
Hi Patipat,
Please try signing out, then back in with your ken account and creating
an app.
-Nick Johnson
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Patipat Susumpow keng...@gmail.com wrote:
keng...@gmail
the same one I've posted here.
I'm curious. When I click Create an Application from this
On 24/06/2009, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com wrote:
Hi Mariano,
Yes, static files are included in your daily traffic quota. Bear in mind
that although App Engine does not provide last-modified or etag headers, it
does set Cache-Control and Expires headers, and you can control
I have now changed it to the second variant, with the Query api, and
the result for 3 test calls was:
6775cpu_ms 6687api_cpu_ms
6757cpu_ms 6687api_cpu_ms
6765cpu_ms 6687api_cpu_ms
That's perhaps a slight improvement, but I have also done
vacuum_indexes which could perhaps have improved the
Hi rraj,
It's possible you're still pointing to a corrupted datastore. Please try
backing up your datastore (if necessary), then running with
--clear_datastore and see if that works.
-Nick Johnson
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 5:43 PM, rraj r.rajku...@gmail.com wrote:
No, but I gave a different
Hi ecognium,
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 6:11 PM, ecognium ecogn...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks again - this is very helpful. I will let you know if i run into
any future index creation errors as it could have been caused by any
number of other entries - i mistakenly thought it was all these categ
Hi Waldemar,
Impressive!
I'm curious - what's the dependency on Django / App Engine patch? This seems
like it should be doable as a purely datastore-oriented library.
-Nick Johnson
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Waldemar Kornewald
app-eng...@scholardocs.com wrote:
Hi,
we'd like to
Hi Dudinha,
What error do you get when you try and do this? And is Google Apps set up on
spread.com.br, or g.spread.com.br? If Apps itself is set up on the parent
domain, you will need to enter that as the authentication domain, not the
subdomain you intend to run your app on.
-Nick Johnson
On
Hi felurkinda,
Done.
-Nick Johnson
2009/6/23 felurkinda tengjiaoz...@gmail.com
Hi Nick:
I've the same problem as Otto. Could manually active my account？
Thanks.
=
Best Regards,
Zhao Tengjiao
--
Nick Johnson, App Engine Developer Programs Engineer
Google Ireland
Hi saltfactory,
I've manually activated your account.
-Nick Johnson
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 5:33 AM, saltfactory saltfact...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm student and live in the South of the Korea,
I want to learning and developing app on google app engine.
so, I signed up app engine account, but
Hi Scott,
Your admin console doesn't show any indexes in 'building' or 'error' state,
or any indexes at all under UserItemSection. Can you try uploading your
index again now?
-Nick Johnson
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Scott sderick...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I'm having a little trouble
It sometimes takes a while for new entity types to be reflected in the Admin
Console. Are the entities showing up now?
No, I'm still seeing the same errors in the console. My app ID is
hogbaytaskpaper.
Jesse
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
Hi Nick:
Thanks!!!
2009/6/24 Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com
Hi felurkinda,
Done.
-Nick Johnson
2009/6/23 felurkinda tengjiaoz...@gmail.com
Hi Nick:
I've the same problem as Otto. Could manually active my account？
Thanks.
=
Best Regards,
Zhao
Can we have a consistent url like *WebApp*.*mydomain.com* instead of
WebApp.appspot.com.
I have admin rights to the Google Apps domain.
--
Thanks and Regards,
Nikhil B. Bharadwaj
I have felt it and lived it and now it leaves me here, love is the ultimate
pain and joy, without it you die with
Nikihil,
The appsport names are very consistent. once you have set up your Google
Apps Account and hooked in your Google App Engine account it is very map
webapp.mydomain.com - you have to remember that google have no control over
your DNS so they can only manage appspot.com and also allow you to
Hi Nick.
On Jun 24, 1:28 pm, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com
wrote:
Hi Waldemar,
Impressive!
Thanks a lot! It's nice to hear that from a Google developer. :) We
hope it's enough to bridge the gap until Google releases super-
powerful full-text search support (with ranking and
Thanks very much! I think I understand indexing with Lists much better
now...
In the case of your index with 4 occurrences, this will rather be 6C4.
Yup, I was looking at the max situation when I use 3 categ fields.
Need to be careful as it grows pretty quickly.
On Jun 24, 4:19 am, Nick
Thanks for the tip savanna!
On May 25, 4:13 pm, Dzsó dzsodzs...@gmail.com wrote:
Thx 4 the solution!
Dzs
On ápr. 15, 04:23, savanna sava...@gmail.com wrote:
I had the same problem too. The solution that I found out is checking
the Google plugins first. They Eclipse shows the error
I also eager to know how do you know that You can send about 4600 a
minute when it's enabled..
On May 5, 12:28 am, Ray Malone rayish...@gmail.com wrote:
I figured out my issue. I needed to enable billing to send more than
32 a minute. You can send about 4600 a minute when it's enabled.
Hi Nick!
I only receive Auth domain, without any further explanation. Both
domains (spread.com.br and g.spread.com.br) are in Google Apps Premier
Edition.
Best regards,
Eduardo
On Jun 24, 8:33 am, Nick Johnson (Google) nick.john...@google.com
wrote:
Hi Dudinha,
What error do you get when
Are there any other AppEngine developers here who are located in the
greater Boston area who would be interested in starting a Users Group?
I am willing to organize such a thing if there is sufficient interest.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
Hi,
I don't really understand the bucket_size parameter in the task config
yaml.
Is it possible de have an example ?
For example, I've 100 tasks in the queue. (rate 1/s)
What does it change if my bucket_size = 1 or 10 ?
and if I have only 5 tasks ? (rate 1/s)
What does it change if my
Sometimes delete operations are implemented to be allowed to take more
time than put operations. Could it be that the delete operation in GAE
has been allowed to be slow in order to make put operations and/or
queries faster?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this
Hey Jeff - sorry for the confusion. The idea was that one would be
able to get the unique id from an GOOG and then do a db.put with that
id as an arg. For example, let's say I want to create two entities,
with each referring to each other. I need to do three db.put
operations:
a = Foo()
Hmm... On a second thought, the put operation is perhaps also costly
in terms of CPU time. I haven't tried doing 20 puts in one page
access. Maybe that would also consume a lot of CPU time. On a
practical level, this is usually not a big problem when the traffic to
the application is low, but
Thanks. That is what I was confirming.
2009/6/24 Ian Lewis ianmle...@gmail.com:
Yes, that is correct.
2009/6/24 Ritesh Nadhani rite...@gmail.com
Actually, what I meant was:
I cannot have an entity with both key_name and id.
They seem to be mutually exclusive for an entity.
2009/6/23
Right now the Task Queue quota is set to 10k tasks, which is rather
small. Can this be bumped to at least 100k?
Thanks
Vivek
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this
I would attend sporadically. Probably not the level of enthusiasm
you're looking for, but at least it's honest :)
On Jun 24, 11:29 am, Adam adam.crossl...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there any other AppEngine developers here who are located in the
greater Boston area who would be interested in
Hi All,
I've scoured the internet looking for info to help resolve this
issue. I've also tried a number of things on my local installation to
trying to resolve this issue, but both have been unsuccessful.
I am encountering an error running the Python Imaging Library 1.1.6
for Python 2.5
Hi Kim,
Can you please try flushing your memcache and running your tests again? The
issue should now be fixed.
-Nick
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Kim Riber kimsteenri...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes. There is no other activity when running step 3.
The two values I get back, are some of the last
Jeff,
I have the same issue, my app id is neatschool. Could you please
assist me as well?
Thanks
On Jun 23, 9:46 am, Jeff S (Google) j...@google.com wrote:
Hi Thomas,
I've reset the index count, apologies for the inconvenience.
Happy coding,
Jeff
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Thomas
Hi Jeff,
This is an idea that we're aware of as well. If you could reserve the next
ID in advance, then you could actually do this in one put since multiple
entities could be sent in one batch :-) The workaround available now is to
use the key_name, but the difficulty becomes ensuring that the
see also
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/3f8cfeaf7dc2eb72/d5d599180fe47e02?lnk=gstq=ryan+allocate#d5d599180fe47e02
On Jun 24, 11:33 am, Jeff S (Google) j...@google.com wrote:
Hi Jeff,
This is an idea that we're aware of as well. If you could reserve the
Hi Waldemar
Kudos for trying to address a serious limitation with google app
engine.
What could we do to convince you to open-source your search
technology? By we, I mean the AppEngine dev community.
If it is a monetary issue, maybe Google could cut your company a
cheque to cover your
I'd be interested.
On Jun 24, 11:29 am, Adam adam.crossl...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there any other AppEngine developers here who are located in the
greater Boston area who would be interested in starting a Users Group?
I am willing to organize such a thing if there is sufficient interest.
Hi,
I'm trying to create a new app engine account\application, but I fail
to pass the activation by SMS screen.
I keep getting the following message: The phone number has been sent
too many messages or has already been used to confirm an account.
I got this message on my first attempt to open
I'm experiencing the same error on both the dev server and when
deployed.
I've created a new issue at:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=1758
On Jun 19, 10:37 pm, James thelevybre...@gmail.com wrote:
I added this code to my main.py file:
from google.appengine.dist
same thing here,
my daily Outgoing Bandwidth shows a limit of 1GB on my quota details
page.
google mentions though there is a daily limit of 10GB even if billing
is not enabled.
http://code.google.com/appengine/docs/quotas.html
GOOLE please HELP
app id: purpleimageapp
thanx!
On Jun 22, 3:19
answering my own problem here.
app engine quotas were reduced rom 10GB to 1GB per day outgoing
bandwidth — crazyy
reco
On Jun 24, 6:12 pm, reco r...@nex9.com wrote:
same thing here,
my daily Outgoing Bandwidth shows a limit of 1GB on myquotadetails
page.
google mentions though
he cc,
yes this is crazy
at least if you enable billing they could give you 5GB outgoing
bandwidth for free.
have the free accounts limited to 1GB i think is fine.
reco
On Jun 22, 10:08 pm, cc c...@gamegiants.net wrote:
Yep same problem here 403s everywhere! Try using the Remote API it is
I am currently using app-engine-patch, but now that Django 1.0 has
been released on GAE, I'd like to port my app over. App-engine-patch
zipimports Django and patches a lot of things to make it work out of
the box, for example the User model is modified to use GAE models, and
memcache is used for
It could be that the cron jobs are run on a different farm of computers.
If you call cron every 5 min it means the server has to start cold for
every cron request.
If you use the regular URL from a browser or such you likely have a
warm server running.
2009/6/24 Mariano Benitez
Now that the quota has been reduced for free accounts, I am much more
concerned over the timeouts and if the CPU time for these timeouts
count towards the quota. The CPU time used when a timeout occurs is
much longer than a successful request. I have yet to figure out why I
get timeouts on
In order to address this issue properly, one really needs to step back
a bit and focus on the bigger picture.
The real issue is not so much Java vs Python but rather statically-
typed vs dynamically-typed languages.
In the days of old, the Java high-priests blew off dynamically-typed
languages
Forget the settings.py file.
Have you tried to import the humanize file in the .py file that uses
the templates that needs these filters
import django.contrib.humanize.templatetags.humanize
The code will register the filters during the load.
NO need to use
{% load humanize %}
because the
Does anybody has any idea on this?
On Jun 23, 6:06 pm, anjs jnanj...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it a limitation from google that it sends the email to sender in
all cases?
Although the google doc says it sends email to sender only in case of
error and
bouunce messages,
Seconded. For the queues to be useful for some of the applications I
currently use client-side polling to accomplish, the daily number of
tasks would have to be several orders of magnitude larger (100M).
Ben
On Jun 24, 10:33 am, vivpuri vivpu...@gmail.com wrote:
Right now the Task Queue quota
67 matches
Mail list logo
