This seems pretty basic. Can somebody wake me from this nightmare?
Sorry, been there...
If I was starting over, I'd seriously think about:
http://code.google.com/p/objectify-appengine/
for two reasons:
1) Objectify entities can be used in GWT without the need for Data
Transfer Objects.
2) it
On 22 Mar 2010, at 13:20, Shawn Brown wrote:
1) Objectify entities can be used in GWT without the need for Data
Transfer Objects.
Twig data models also have this property but with the advantage that
they have no dependencies on the low-level datastore - just pure
unrestricted pojos.
Something has gotten broken with recent release because my code used
to work fine with Hotmail/Yahoo sent messages. Looks like I have to go
through release notes for 1.3.1 and fix processing incoming emails.. :-
(
On Mar 21, 11:48 pm, Lucian Baciu lucianba...@gmail.com wrote:
The mail processing
On Mar 21, 6:45 pm, Max Ross (Google) maxr+appeng...@google.com
wrote:
Hi AJ,
Your understanding is correct and I don't quite know what we meant when we
said same level of isolation and consistency. I'll get this sorted out.
thanks, I appreciate the reply!
--
You received this message
There's no way to just update static assets. I find that I always have
to update my HTML files whenever I update my static assets anyway. As
a safeguard against caches, it's a common practice to reference your
CSS and JavaScript files like this
script
Hi all,
I`m sure lot you have faced this error and I saw some post for it but
couldn`t find some more
general way for handling it.
Iterating over the whole datastore after my app is broken doesn`t
seems to me the fastest way.
Knowing the connections between models and cascade delete/update if
Thanks for responding. I've starred the bug - it seems basic. More
answers below.
On Mar 21, 7:06 pm, Eli Jones eli.jo...@gmail.com wrote:
Depending on how your Models are defined (how many properties and what the
property types are there) and depending on custom indexes, 10 to 1 is
On Mar 22, 6:30 am, Eli Jones eli.jo...@gmail.com wrote:
Depends on how you want the code to work..
If you just want to send of work to get processed by those other handlers,
then firing off a Task (either with Task Queue or Deferred Task) would be
perfect for that.
Actually, this is a
Are you storing anything in the Blob Store? If so, well, deleting Blobs
from the AppSpot console does not work. Perhaps the problem is systemic.
But, if it helps revenue, then why fix it?
-Brett
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 5:26 AM, Robert Kluin robert.kl...@gmail.comwrote:
I do not think they
Hi,
The discrepancy between datastore stats volume and stored data is generally
due to indexing overhead, which is not included in the datastore stats. This
can be very high for entities with many properties, or with long entity and
property names or entity keys. Do you have reason to suppose
On Mar 22, 4:20 am, homunq jameson.qu...@gmail.com wrote:
I have no custom indexes. I have only two entities. 99.9% of the data
is in the Expando which has about 45 stringproperties (initally all
indexed, now around 30 are; many frequently empty string); 4 integer
properties; 4 dates; 4
On Mar 22, 12:36 am, Iap iap...@gmail.com wrote:
My concern is that the open-source GAE would also expose the weakness of
GAE.
That makes the GAE more vulnerable under attacking.
I hope you're not coding in a programming language that's open
source. Just imagine the vulnerabilities. Of
Hi Robert,
Thank you very much for your feedback, you've raised my attention on
points I hadn't considered into account.
Are all of these entities global or are some or all of them user-specific?
LO will be user specific since their Knowledge attribute will
correspond to a specific user's
xoopit?
On Mar 22, 4:24 am, Tom Wu service.g2...@gmail.com wrote:
xoopit
2010/3/22 romuwild rom...@gmail.com
is there any way to let a user sign in using the google account API
and then access its gmail atom feed without any relogin?
thanks!
--
You received this message because
Issue filed:
http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=3001
On Mar 21, 11:21 pm, Robert Kluin robert.kl...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree, it would be very nice to have something in the local dev
server that would help estimate the space required on the production
system.
If you
OK, I guess I'm guilty on all counts.
Clearly, I can fix that moving forward, though it will cost me a lot
of CPU to fix the data I've already entered. But as a short-term
stopgap, is there any way to delete entire default indexes for a given
property? (I mean, anything besides setting
Sorry, this thread is a duplicate of a href=http://groups.google.com/
group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/2a116e341b97c6fd/
6ad663cd210032b2?lnk=gstthat other one/a. I got impatient and
reposted before the other one got moderated. Useful word from Google
along with my response is over
Hello!
I spend more than few hours using google and reading django and
google app engine documentation, but I couldn't find solution for my
problem. So I expect maybe somebody could helps me.
So I have model:
class Advertisement(db.Model):
name =
i just uploaded wrong files to my application..so,is there any way to
delete them or reset that to undeveloped?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com.
To
Hi !
I wonder how to compare a String stored in a datastore entity (field
login) to an entry (also named login) considering their lowercase
version :
- I tried : SELECT count(this) FROM +Gestionnaire.class.getName()+
WHERE LowerCase(login)== LowerCase('+login+') which throws an
exception
I have
hello, I am Brazilian and participate in this nearby group.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Google App Engine group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appeng...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
I have developed a application in my local system its running
correctly. after uploading to the GAE its giving following exception:
115.108.122.17 - - [22/Mar/2010:02:41:51 -0700] POST /smartstore/
greet HTTP/1.1 200 134 http://smartstoreact.appspot.com/smartstore/
It is still unclear to me exactly how many index entries will be
produced by including multiple ListProperty's in an entity. In one
post [1], between the inquiring user and the Google rep, the
possibilities for the number of index entries included the power set,
Cartesian product, or the number of
If you want to compare lowercase you have to store the value lowercase
in the object.
GQL != SQL You can't do more then described on the GQL reference page.
You have to traverse (get) all you current objects and make the field
login lowercase and store the object back and as such update the
Change the version name of the app, upload the new version, make it
default and remove the old version.
2010/3/22 Snoopy tootoo1...@gmail.com:
i just uploaded wrong files to my application..so,is there any way to
delete them or reset that to undeveloped?
--
You received this message because
If you're using a relational database it's pretty easy to execute case-
insensitive queries because it's a native feature of the database. It
usually looks something like this:
select * from Person where UPPER(lastName) = 'ROSS'
This is a challenge for the App Engine Datastore because we rely
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 5:47 AM, Wooble geoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mar 22, 12:36 am, Iap iap...@gmail.com wrote:
My concern is that the open-source GAE would also expose the weakness of
GAE.
That makes the GAE more vulnerable under attacking.
I hope you're not coding in a
Hey Nick,
Just out of curiosity, how many properties would it take to get that amount
of wasted space in overhead? Are we talking about entities in the orders of
magnitudes of tens/thousands/hundreds?
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 9:07 AM, homunq jameson.qu...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, I guess I'm
Hi Patrick,
An overhead factor of 12 (as observed below) is high, but not outrageous.
With long model names and property names, this could happen with relatively
few indexed properties - on the order of magnitude of tens, at most.
-Nick Johnson
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:07 PM, Patrick Twohig
OK, after hashing it out on IRC, I see that I have to erase my data
and start again. Since it took me 3 days of CPU quota to add the data,
I want to know if I can erase it quickly.
1. Is the overhead for erasing data (and thus whittling down indexes)
over half the overhead from adding it? Under
I'd use a cursor on the task queue. Do bulk deletes in blocks of 500 (I
think that's the most keys you can pass to delete on a single call) and it
shouldn't be that hard to wipe it out.
Cheers!
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:45 PM, homunq jameson.qu...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, after hashing it out on
oh man.. well, he's going to be wiping out 7GB of junk... :)
When I went through process of deleting something like 400MB of junk.. it
was not fun
First I started off deleting by __key__ in batches of 500, then I had to
limit down to 200.. then down to 100.. then down to 50.. then down to
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:45 PM, homunq jameson.qu...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, after hashing it out on IRC, I see that I have to erase my data
and start again.
Why is that? Wouldn't updating the data be a better option?
Since it took me 3 days of CPU quota to add the data,
I want to know
I understand I cannot change the option while the application is
enabled. Also that the application Id is reserved if I delete the
application. But... can I re-create the application with a different
login option, or the app id is reserved to never be used again?
Thanks!
--
You received this
To my knowledge the appid can only be once allocated.
If you delete the app the appid is no more available.
2010/3/23 Mariano Benitez mari...@benitez.nu:
I understand I cannot change the option while the application is
enabled. Also that the application Id is reserved if I delete the
Here is the specific documentation on app deletion:
http://code.google.com/appengine/kb/adminconsole.html#delete_app
http://code.google.com/appengine/kb/adminconsole.html#delete_appYou cannot
use the appid again, unfortunately.
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:25 PM, djidjadji djidja...@gmail.com
Hi there. I have an application that requires me to read in and
transform an XSLT stylesheet, which I keep in the directory /xml in /
war.
I've read the tutorials, and I've included it as a resource file (more
specifically, set that all xsl files are included as resource files),
but when I try to
after updating to the newest release (20100319) of the eclipse plugin
(on 3/22), datanucleus enhancer is throwing null pointer exceptions
again. last time, it was due to classpath that was too long. removing
some unneeded jars out of my WEB-INF/lib directory seemed to do the
trick. this time, i
Hello --
My very simple app works fine on the dev server, but once uploaded it
can't access a file in one of my static directories. I have a static
directory HTML with two files in it. The first comes up fine (I
redirect to it from .py script) but the other HTML file always brings
an error when I
I use
Class.getResourceAsStream(/xml/myschema.xsd);
Cheers!
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Iain Flynn trancedsha...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi there. I have an application that requires me to read in and
transform an XSLT stylesheet, which I keep in the directory /xml in /
war.
I've read
OK, I just watched Brett Slatkin's I/O talk [1] and he mentions cross
product a couple of times, so it seems that the use of the word
permutation in the docs is incorrect; the number of index entries is
indeed proportional to the Cartesian product, rather than
permutations which would lead to a
You can save storage by just quote Max Ross's article...
http://gae-java-persistence.blogspot.com/2009/11/case-insensitive-queries.html
On Mar 23, 12:27 am, Gleidson - MG - Brasil
gleidson.gmo...@gmail.com wrote:
If you're using a relational database it's pretty easy to execute case-
Hello,
And another thing I want to be able to do is figure out the HTTP
return code for that internal URL. Since everything in already a web
hook, I might as well model my app. in a similar fashion. I was
wondering if the appengine guys could work out a hack for urllib where
calls to internal
Hello,
I have a model with a single attribute that is a StringListProperty.
I get an error if I define it as such:
class Test(db.Expando):
people = db.StringListProperty(required=False, indexed=True)
However, on changing it to:
class Test(db.Expando):
people =
My crontabs have been taking around 500-600 cpu seconds, but today
have been up over 1000 cpu seconds. I'm not asserting that there's an
issue - it's possible it was a change I made, which is why I'm asking
around.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
45 matches
Mail list logo
