Re: [google-appengine] OAuth and OAuth 2.0

g my @gmail.com account, then add my other account of a custom domain as administrator. You can then enable billing from your custom domain account and even remove the original @gmail.com account which you'd initially created a project with. -- alex On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:29 PM, Daniel Per

Re: [google-appengine] OAuth and OAuth 2.0

h, but I don't believe there's one for Delphi. At least not from Google. Sorry, I was programming in Delphi like 20 years ago so I'm pretty sure my knowledge is useless. On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Daniel Perry wrote: > Hi Alex, > I looked at the OAuth 2.0 under the trust

Re: [google-appengine] OAuth and OAuth 2.0

forum/oauth2-dev Sorry if I misunderstood what you're actually trying to do. -- alex On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Daniel Perry wrote: > Hi Alex, > Thanks for your comment. > I am trying to access my own app deployed on production servers. > However, my application is a j

Re: [google-appengine] OAuth and OAuth 2.0

which is currently under trusted tester program. You can sign up here: http://endpoints-trusted-tester.appspot.com/ -- alex On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Daniel Perry wrote: > Hi, > As I can't seem to get help regarding my failure to use OAuth 1.0 to access > my appengine ap

Re: [google-appengine] Why "latest" is not a valid version name anymore?

t.com anyway. It's like an alias. On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 8:43 PM, alex wrote: > Upload a new version, e.g. "mynewawesomeversion" and set the default > to that so that users will access your app at myapp.appspot.com (or a > custom domain) and not latest.myapp.appspot.com

Re: [google-appengine] Why "latest" is not a valid version name anymore?

outing. If you have some changes that you can't make backward compatible with mobile client, you could always do something like myapp.appspot.com/v1/... and /v2/... I believe it's much better than making your mobile client connect to a specific version-based subdomain. -- alex On S

Re: [google-appengine] Why "latest" is not a valid version name anymore?

You can always set the *default* to whatever version you have deployed. What's wrong with that? On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Iaco86 wrote: > Hi everyone, > I have a version of my python appengine server that is named "latest". This > is the version used by the web applications that interface

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google App Engine SDK 1.7.2 is out

Totally agree. Awesome release. I'm really happy to see so many bugs fixed in a single release. Keep it coming! -- alex On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Per wrote: > > Thanks Takashi and everyone on the GAE team. > > It's great to see how many bugfixes you squeezed in, a

[google-appengine] Re: Asynchronous Google Storage Post using Boto and UrlFetch

e/docs/python/ndb/async#urlfetch> or use Task Queue for that (or both). -- alex On Friday, September 21, 2012 6:53:42 PM UTC+2, Adam Bradley wrote: > > I'd like to upload files to Google Storage asynchronously using Boto and > UrlFetch. However, I'm not fully understanding how

Re: [google-appengine] Re: APP DOWN: App suddenly no longer starts, no code changes

ng model is the simplest I've ever seen. I'm not advertising here, just saying: I was really impressed, also from tech support point of view. They always responded back to me within 24 hours (and never charged me for that). -- alex On Thursday, September 13, 2012 8:24:21 AM UTC+2, Br

[google-appengine] Re: Custom expires/cache-control for get_serving_url images

blobstore api). In fact, this could be even better as there would be fewer > domain names to look up. > > On Friday, August 31, 2012 12:21:25 AM UTC+2, Alex Burgel wrote: >> >> I've noticed that image urls generated by get_serving_url are set to >> cache for only 24

[google-appengine] Custom expires/cache-control for get_serving_url images

I've noticed that image urls generated by get_serving_url are set to cache for only 24 hours. Is it possible to change this? 24 hours isn't very long, especially considering that the images can't change. The Page Speed proxy service caches for 1 year, thats much more reasonable. -- You receiv

[google-appengine] Re: "The number of errors generated by your application every second"

On Friday, September 4, 2009 9:12:09 PM UTC+2, Jeff Enderwick wrote: > In the context dashboard, what precisely does 'errors' mean? > I see an error frequency in the dashboard that is much higher than > what I see in the logs. Can somebody explain this? We have same problem. -- You received thi

[google-appengine] Re: REST integration Tests with Java and Junit

tSomething() { resp = get("/some/path?query=goes&here=too") // or post(payload) // do something with resp, // e.g. make assertions } Maybe there's a better way but the idea above works pretty well for us. On Sunday, August 19, 2012 9:26:23 PM UTC+2, Christopher Armstrong w

[google-appengine] Re: REST integration Tests with Java and Junit

I never used Jersey but what we're doing in this kind of testing is simply mocking (HttpServletRequest)request.getInputStream() and a couple other methods so that they would operate on payloads provided within the unit tests or files on a disk, and (mocked) Response would write to a string (in

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Instances/Java go crazy

@pphalen just remember, you're reading replies from other developers, which are often biased (e.g. to a specific programming language) or coming from a different background; others wear mermaid costume; etc. For instance, > Nothing in the datastore can change faster than once per second; is tr

[google-appengine] Re: Bastion Sign IN

On Monday, May 21, 2012 9:55:34 PM UTC-4, D wrote: > It is not allowing me to sign in I am having the same issue. I do not understand why this has not been addressed in anyway. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this

[google-appengine] Re: Getting order of Entity based on index and property.

ugust 17, 2012 11:05:10 AM UTC+2, Oliver Billing wrote: > > Yeah, but it is too slow and would cost too many read operations *sigh* > Besides the score will be updated frquently > > On Friday, August 17, 2012 10:05:41 AM UTC+2, alex wrote: >> >> Looks like a perfect

[google-appengine] Getting order of Entity based on index and property.

Looks like a perfect task for mapreduce. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/US1ujqrpEz0J. To post to this group, send email to google-

Re: [google-appengine] How can I block curl requests

06 > - subnet: 138.246.99.249 > - subnet: 129.242.19.197 > - subnet: 206.12.16.154 > - subnet: 160.193.163.106 > - subnet: 152.3.138.6 > - subnet: 195.37.16.121 > > I am up to 100 now because of these individual ones. > > > On Thursday, August 9, 2012 5:37:41 PM UTC-4, alex wrote:

Re: [google-appengine] How can I block curl requests

Actually, scratch last three lines (starting from # these belong to...) and replace with - subnet: 141.0.0.0/8 On Thursday, August 9, 2012 11:32:03 PM UTC+2, alex wrote: > > A lot of those IPs are assigned to universities, like almost literally all > of them. More than 50% are US uni

Re: [google-appengine] How can I block curl requests

200.0.206.168 > - subnet: 200.17.202.195 > - subnet: 200.129.132.19 > - subnet: 202.23.159.52 > - subnet: 202.125.215.12 > - subnet: 202.237.248.222 > - subnet: 202.249.37.67 > - subnet: 203.110.240.190 > - subnet: 203.178.133.2 > - subnet: 212.51.218.235 > - s

Re: [google-appengine] How can I block curl requests

> They are all different. > > Kate > > > > On Thursday, August 9, 2012 9:55:29 AM UTC-4, alex wrote: >> >> Kate, >> >> If barryhunter is right and all the IPs are coming from the same ISP >> anyway, you can simply block the whole subnetwork ranges of

Re: [google-appengine] How can I block curl requests

every time you encounter new subnets but at least you could probably save some quota 'till you move somewhere else or figure something out. -- alex On Thursday, August 9, 2012 1:59:57 PM UTC+2, Kate wrote: > > Hi Sergey, > > Here is a typical example > 2012-08-09 06:51:16.597 /

[google-appengine] Re: G+ hangout on Wed., 8th Aug., at 4pm PDT - Cloud Endpoints

touch this". -- alex On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 10:58:03 PM UTC+2, Amy Unruh wrote: > > Reminder: join us today for a G+ hangout on Cloud Endpoints, Wed. 4pm PDT. > > https://developers.google.com/live/shows/ahNzfmdvb2dsZS1kZXZlbG9wZXJzcg4LEgVFdmVudBjAjqkDDA/ > > On 7 Au

[google-appengine] Re: The Data Collection for Game Question

I think you meant XMPP (though Channels API are indeed based on XMPP). As Kris mentioned, Channel client is available only in JS whereas XMPP is for a server side (i.e. what you probably need). On Wednesday, August 8, 2012 7:47:09 PM UTC+2, Brandon Wirtz wrote: > > I don’t have time to build a

[google-appengine] Re: What are the pros and cons of using Google App engine for my startup?

least. plus, I think someone mentioned. - Examples are too simple, e.g. Hello World. So, you'll need to actually figure it out yourself. This is not the case with Go land - their examples are closer to real world. Overall we're more than happy with AE. It saved us tons of money so far.

[google-appengine] Re: Unique Integer ID for a non primary key field for Entities in Google App Engine

Forget the compress part. Hash instead, SHA1 or something. You would need to store and index the hashed value in that row so you can query for it. On Monday, August 6, 2012 11:07:34 AM UTC-4, Alex Burgel wrote: > > You could compress then base64 the url and use that value to share. &g

[google-appengine] Re: Unique Integer ID for a non primary key field for Entities in Google App Engine

You could compress then base64 the url and use that value to share. Also, questions like this should probably go to stackoverflow. You're more likely to get a useful response there. On Monday, August 6, 2012 9:41:19 AM UTC-4, Neo wrote: > > Any one?? -- You received this message because you ar

[google-appengine] Re: IOError: [Errno 13] file not accessible after install setuptools

http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=7301 On Friday, August 3, 2012 11:07:10 PM UTC+2, coto wrote: > > I installed setuptools on my Macbook Pro Mountain Lion, and Babel with > Jinja2 in order to run Babel locally. > > $ sh setuptools-0.6c11-py2.7.egg --prefix=~ > --install-

Re: [google-appengine] Re: How to move data reliably from front to backends ?

>From Rackspace (London): ab -n 1000 -c 200 http://sven-anagramhero.appspot.com/client/loadtest This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3 <$Revision: 655654 $> Server Software:Google Server Hostname:sven-anagramhero.appspot.com Server Port:80 Document Path: /client/l

Re: [google-appengine] Re: How to move data reliably from front to backends ?

As far as I understand, Google recommends closing connection right away, after you perform all operations. The latency to check whether a connection is still open is (almost?) the same as opening a new one, so it doesn't seem to be worth keeping it open. They also say a per-hour-usage db instan

Re: [google-appengine] Re: How to move data reliably from front to backends ?

I don't know. Do you? If not, I think it is at least worth a consideration. -- alex On Aug 1, 2012 1:33 AM, "Jeff Schnitzer" wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:48 PM, alex wrote: > >> At this point I think the GAE toolbox is empty. > > > > How about

Re: [google-appengine] Re: How to move data reliably from front to backends ?

> At this point I think the GAE toolbox is empty. How about Cloud SQL? On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 12:12:05 AM UTC+2, Jeff Schnitzer wrote: > > If Richard's metrics are right (he has created a very exact timing > system which accounts for skew, so I suspect they are), there's > sometimes a 4s

[google-appengine] --oauth2 not working for download_data?

I guess it's pretty much the same bug as http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=7011 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appeng

[google-appengine] Re: Sending message trough channel API takes 100 times more time

Please do check for already filed issues and posts before submitting a new one: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine-downtime-notify/2TKE5CQKk1I/kIUkrFox_2MJ http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=7899 -- alex On Thursday, July 26, 2012 2:20:13 PM UTC+2, Aleksei

[google-appengine] Re: is there any datastore-like open source db could be used outside of gae?

If you want to be as much compatible as possible, Riak [1] supports protobuf. Unfortunately, I haven't seen .proto files opensourced in the App Engine SVN repo. [1] http://wiki.basho.com/Developers.html -- alex On Saturday, July 21, 2012 1:26:20 PM UTC+2, saintthor wrote: > > if

[google-appengine] Re: App Engine getting slower and slower

The scheduling is completely different for backends, and if you're using only one instance there's simply no autoscale scheduling. Requests are simply put into a waiting queue 'till the backend is free (or they time out). -- alex On Thursday, July 12, 2012 2:29:52 PM UTC+2, Ma

[google-appengine] Should developers pay for the useless instances? Can we set max instances to 1?

What's the point in using AE infrastructure then? You're probably better off to EC2 micro instance, or openshift, or cloudfoundry, or appfog, or heroku, in that case. Personally, I'd be -1 unstarring (if I could) such a feature. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the G

[google-appengine] Re: GWT for GAE Python

Do you mean Google Closure Library + tools? On Thursday, June 28, 2012 6:08:49 AM UTC+2, Nick Ace wrote: > > hi to all, > > is there a Solid GWT library for GAE Python? > or can we use UI service library for our GAE project's client side Web > application ? > > more like a jquery UI's plugins? >

Re: [google-appengine] Re: 1.7.0 Prerelease Now Available

Why not try Page Speed service instead? On Thursday, June 21, 2012 11:32:27 PM UTC+2, Jeff Schnitzer wrote: > > I hate to sound like the cloudflare shill, but why not use them as a > frontend cache? One of their touted features is aggressive gzipping > of content. > > Jeff > > On Thu, Jun 21

Re: [google-appengine] Can I copycat a OpenID provider app?

Or you could take a look at webapp2's auth module+ user model, Account Chooser and/or Google Identity Toolkit, or authenticating users agains

[google-appengine] Datastore OR Queries in SDK 1.7

Does this just do multiple queries then merge the results or is a true OR query. For billing purposes how does this affect the pricing model? Do I get charged for 1 or multiple queries? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To

[google-appengine] Re: 1.7.0 Prerelease Now Available

> > Is the Or query a true Or query or is it multiple queries merged into 1 > result. If so do we get billed for multiple queries or just 1? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit htt

[google-appengine] Re: Memcache down?

here memcache and other services are blazing fast (though it's running in python runtime). On Monday, June 18, 2012 12:22:43 PM UTC+2, doright wrote: > > and yet system status says all is fine! > http://code.google.com/status/appengine > > > On Monday, June 18, 2012 12:21:24 PM UTC+2, doright w

Re: [google-appengine] If your bill shoots up due to increased latency, you may not be refunded the charges incurred

I don't personally see it as "degraded == more profitable", quite the opposite. And to remind you while you're bashing, AWS (since you mentioned it) has its moments too http://blog.phpfog.com/2012/06/15/post-mortem-on-aws-outage/ In this particular one, degraded EBS, would degrade a handful app

Re: [google-appengine] If your bill shoots up due to increased latency, you may not be refunded the charges incurred

On Thursday, June 14, 2012 12:18:46 AM UTC+2, Jeff Schnitzer wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 2:39 PM, alex wrote: > > > > Secondly, for a mid to high load app you will definitely end up running > more > > than one EC2 instance (otherwise, you might as well

[google-appengine] Re: If your bill shoots up due to increased latency, you may not be refunded the charges incurred

adline/timeout settings, latency sliders, idle instances, reserved instance hours, backends, etc. It's just not expressed in "number of instances" parameter, that's it. > > On Wednesday, 13 June 2012 21:20:16 UTC+1, alex wrote: >> >> Simon, so you'

Re: [google-appengine] If your bill shoots up due to increased latency, you may not be refunded the charges incurred

On Wednesday, June 13, 2012 10:52:55 PM UTC+2, Jeff Schnitzer wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Brandon Wirtz > wrote: > > I know exactly how much every request cost me. > > > > cpm_usd=0.000308 > > > > cpm_usd=0.000175 > > These numbers tell you how much a request cost, but do

[google-appengine] Re: If your bill shoots up due to increased latency, you may not be refunded the charges incurred

Simon, so you're saying that setting Min Pending Latency slider to e.g. 10s does not work for you? On Wednesday, June 13, 2012 10:09:20 PM UTC+2, Simon Knott wrote: > > I still find it bizarre that we can't cap the maximum number of instances. > > > If we could say "I never want any more than

[google-appengine] Re: If your bill shoots up due to increased latency, you may not be refunded the charges incurred

PaaS or IaaS) that covers a service degradation. Though a fair comparison would be GAE vs Heroku / Azure / CloudFoundry / OpenShift / , but then most of them don't even have one. And if they do, they usually refund 25-30% max (vs 50% GAE). -- alex On Wednesday, June 13, 2012 10:20:2

[google-appengine] Re: Datastore Backup / Restore by namespace. Is scripting on servers such as Amazon the only solution ?

backup.yaml sounds nice but what stops you from going 1 step further and implementing it using scheduled tasks service? (cron.yaml) All pieces are already there, you just need to connect them together. -- alex On Saturday, June 9, 2012 7:39:19 PM UTC+2, Jason Collins wrote: > > I enc

[google-appengine] Re: will the browser open my gae site via spdy if it supports?

http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=4859 On Thursday, June 7, 2012 1:51:24 PM UTC+2, saintthor wrote: > > it seems so. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https:

[google-appengine] Re: This SDK release is newer than the advertised release.

since 1.6.5, I think. Just use --skip_sdk_update_check to mute. On Wednesday, June 6, 2012 2:36:14 PM UTC+2, Kenneth wrote: > > Anyone else getting this since upgrading to 1.6.6? > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To vie

Re: [google-appengine] Deployment

Sounds like a dialup to me. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/2EmSvJPrTdwJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@goo

Re: [google-appengine] Huge execution times. DeadlineExceededException(s). Crushing Weltschmerz.

Could it be that your average response time became much higher than the spinup time? That might explain the new instance. Also, have you tried running it with multithreading enabled? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view

[google-appengine] Re: How to use goog.net.IframeIo to upload a file to Blobstore in Python?

BlobstoreUploadHandler will probably work best with create_upload_url("/partner") - that's what you want to set in - try that and see if it works. On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 12:41:36 PM UTC+2, Mohit Chilkoti wrote: >

[google-appengine] Re: Best way to read/write text data

I'd definitely use blobstore for "pastes" and keep a reference to that blob in the datastore along with metadata you might have attached to that blob. On Monday, May 28, 2012 9:56:13 PM UTC+2, Alex V. wrote: > > Hi, i'm trying to figure out best way to do this. I bas

[google-appengine] Best way to read/write text data

Hi, i'm trying to figure out best way to do this. I basically want to create a pastebin alternative on app engine, whats the best way to read/write such paste into on an App Engine stack? Should i use blobstore or try to dump them into data store? Any feedback is well appreciated, thanks! -- You

Re: [google-appengine] Channel API issues

There's also a little open issue with Channels API here if this is your case: http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=4940 On Thursday, May 24, 2012 5:22:40 PM UTC+2, c h wrote: > > i'm having trouble on win7 Firefox. i get the onOpen, but don't get > error/close and still do

[google-appengine] Re: Google Docs and AppEngine: NoClassDefFoundError... why?

If this helps: in case you're using OAuth 2.0 for authentication, you'll need Google HTTP Client [1] and Google OAuth Client [2] in addition to GData Client library. I just wrote a little overview on the related stuff here yesterday: http://alex.cloudware.it/2012/05/google-apis-authentication-a

[google-appengine] Re: Cannot add acces from Google Apps domain to Google App Eninge application.

nesday, May 23, 2012 1:10:20 PM UTC+2, Jeroen Benckhuijsen wrote: > > Hi Alex, > > Thanks for the reply. With regards to the auth page, I was referring to > the last section ("Configuring Google Apps to Authenticate on Appspot"), > forgot to mention that. > > Thi

[google-appengine] Re: Cannot add acces from Google Apps domain to Google App Eninge application.

here are different authentication methods and you might find that what you really wanted was OAuth 2.0 or something else. -- alex On Wednesday, May 23, 2012 11:36:05 AM UTC+2, Jeroen Benckhuijsen wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to add my custom AppEngine application to my Goo

[google-appengine] Re: Can i update code in my GAE application (test1.appspot.com) through my second GAE application (test2.appspot.com)?

I guess you'll need to dive in the SDK code of how "appcfg.py update" is implemented. It even supports OAuth2 now. I believe appcfg.py creates a staging dir during the update, so your challenge will probably be in figuring out how to do that with a "read-only" filesystem (blobs? in memory?) No

[google-appengine] Re: sendmail NOT WORKING anymore...

1 year is a long term. I assume you've already ran your app (unit) tests with the latest SDK version? On Sunday, May 20, 2012 7:07:20 PM UTC+2, smallufo wrote: > > I didn't change any line of my code . > I deployed my app about one year ago and never touched it ever since. > Today , I found I

[google-appengine] Re: Google Channel API

If you're talking about local dev environment - that's how it is simulated locally. It indeed employes a push mechanism when running on production servers. On Thursday, May 17, 2012 5:01:35 PM UTC+2, Kareem Hashem wrote: > > Hello, > > I was trying Google Channel API and I was expecting it works

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Feedback on experimental Mac Launcher for Python

able to get that freezing behavior. Well, unless there's something weird with my local setup. In the latter case I'd love to be able to figure out what it is as I really like the launcher and its simplicity. On Thursday, May 17, 2012 3:38:31 PM UTC+2, alex wrote: > > It occurs

[google-appengine] Re: Feedback on experimental Mac Launcher for Python

o, at the end of the day I find myself using SDK *.py scripts directly from the Terminal (which I don't mind actually). Unfortunately, I can't really provide some deterministic steps to reproduce "freezing" right now. But, I noticed it almost always happend when I click "s

[google-appengine] Re: Maximum time a single task can run for (Python)

See URL argument in the constructor: https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/python/taskqueue/tasks#Task (same for Java) On Wednesday, May 9, 2012 2:55:46 PM UTC+2, Ian Gillett wrote: > > Many thanks - how do you specify to run backend? > Cheers. > > On Wednesday, 9 May 2012 13:10:14 UTC+1,

[google-appengine] Re: email threads in outgoing mail

Here's a perfect example: https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/python/mail/headers I was playing with headers just a month back and it all works just fine. What might not work in your case, is that when a real person (with a real email client) responds, the client might just not include

Re: [google-appengine] SLA clarifications

gt; of them I also saw some occasional 500's, like 10% etc but if you don't use > a third party service to monitor health I guess it would be impossible to > detect these. > > It would be great if SLA perks were automatic > > On Saturday, April 28, 2012

[google-appengine] Re: UserService gets back to google.com rather than the application url

Why would you have userService.createLoginURL(userService.createLoginURL(" http://www.yatrafinder.com";)), wrapped one in another like that? I guess you should be doing something like `return userService.createLoginURL("http://www.yatrafinder.com";)`, that's it. Have you ever checked Using the U

Re: [google-appengine] SLA clarifications

It's in the "Customer Must Request Financial Credit" section of the SLA, though I've never had to go there because we've never had issues on that level so far. On Saturday, April 28, 2012 5:08:08 PM UTC+2, Kaan Soral wrote: > > How does the "the comp

Re: [google-appengine] URGENT main url path: "/", not serving.. but getting 200 response

Oops. Sorry, it was Barry suggesting DNS change. On Saturday, April 28, 2012 10:13:26 AM UTC+2, alex wrote: > > I think you can actually do it without manual intervention from Google > internally: > > Let's say your app (with cached blank page) is currently accessible as >

Re: [google-appengine] URGENT main url path: "/", not serving.. but getting 200 response

I think you can actually do it without manual intervention from Google internally: Let's say your app (with cached blank page) is currently accessible as www.example.org 1. make sure you remove "cache-control: public ..." headers from the response 2. add a mapping that will make your app acces

Re: [google-appengine] SLA clarifications

liked, actually) but you'd still need to do some provisioning and monitoring, meaning spending time on admin stuff and less on your product/service/whatever it is. Thanks again! Alex. On Friday, April 27, 2012 6:43:59 PM UTC+2, Greg D'Alesandre wrote: > > Hey Alex, > >

Re: [google-appengine] SLA clarifications

d what guarantees my company can give to our customers based on AE TOS and SLA (again, if applicable without applying for a Premier account). Thanks a lot, Alex. On Thursday, April 26, 2012 8:01:43 PM UTC+2, alex wrote: > > Right. Thanks for the link, Barry. > > The thing is, tha

Re: [google-appengine] SLA clarifications

. > > Anyone actually paying for the service. > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:08 PM, alex wrote: > > I'm afraid my post got lost somewhere in other threads so I'll start a > new > > one. > > I was re-reading it (https://developers.google.com/appengine/

[google-appengine] SLA clarifications

ing Requests form<http://support.google.com/code/bin/request.py?contact_type=cloud_platform_billing>as it asks for a App ID and this is not about a specific app deployed on AE. Could someone from AE team clarify the above or direct me to an official channel (e.g. appengine_premier_reque...@google

Re: [google-appengine] Large latency spike, need assistance

nt only, or both. Thanks, Alex. On Thursday, April 26, 2012 8:58:27 AM UTC+2, Takashi Matsuo (Google) wrote: > > Hi Nathan, > > I think it's OK now. Are you still seeing this? > > BTW, this list is not a support channel with any kind of SLA. Now > we're offer

[google-appengine] Re: configuring backends

The docsalso mention execution of a "appcfg backends update [backend]" to update or create your backends config on AE. On Sunday, April 22, 2012 3:58:52 AM UTC+2, James Gilliam wrote: > > Using python 2.7 threadsa

[google-appengine] Re: Google app engine dashboard display not correctly!

http://code.google.com/p/googleappengine/issues/detail?id=7382 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/psMEiU8HcHUJ. To post to this group,

[google-appengine] Re: Long running work

es being spun up and shut down. I might be wrong here but this is one of the things I took out of my experience running apps on AE. -- alex. On Saturday, April 21, 2012 2:15:00 PM UTC+2, Strom wrote: > > 1. If you always have only one request running at a time then 3 > instances sou

[google-appengine] Happy birthday?

I meant to post this a few days back. Correct me if I'm wrong but April 8th or 11th is the day App Engine was announced as a limited preview. If it is correct, well here it is: happy birthday app engine! alex. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google G

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Outages?

Just to add to Jeff's: do use Appstats too. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/vHytJH0kcDsJ. To post to this group, send email to goog

Re: [google-appengine] Re: scheduler routing to dynamic instance while resident instance is idle

it that part deprecated? > > On Apr 10, 2012, at 4:34 AM, alex wrote: > > I don't know the answer to that but there's definitely some or a few > algorithms to the scheduler. > > I'm sure they're constantly looking to improve it. For example, if I were &

Re: [google-appengine] Re: scheduler routing to dynamic instance while resident instance is idle

s do not get shut down if there is > very little traffic and 1 or 2 instances are handling all the load. > > > On Apr 9, 2012, at 11:57 AM, alex wrote: > > aschmid, as far as I understand, resident instances are there for the > times when there's no dynamic insta

[google-appengine] Re: scheduler routing to dynamic instance while resident instance is idle

aschmid, as far as I understand, resident instances are there for the times when there's no dynamic instance currently available to serve an incoming request. Think of this scenario: suddenly a new request arrives to your app. It is too long to wait for a new dynamic instance to warm up so the

[google-appengine] Re: Help! please

What's java.lang.Boohean ? I guess that's supposed to be *java.lang.Boolean*. You should be testing the code more (you *are* testing your code, right?) On Sunday, April 8, 2012 7:21:30 PM UTC+2, LizBetSoft wrote: > > Some times only in production I got this exception: > > In the stack trace ne

[google-appengine] Re: Adding a domain name to an app should NOT be the obstacle to deploying to GAE

I've had a different experience. It always worked as expected. The only thing I needed to do in advance is change DNS records because it takes time for DNS to propagate globally (well, locally too because of browser cache+OS cache+local DNS servers caches+...) Other than that, no single issue.

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Custom domain issue

easier for governments to spy on their citizens. On Tuesday, April 3, 2012 7:03:07 PM UTC+2, Ruben D. Orduz wrote: > > Not a bad idea, Alex. But I find all the approaches so far like a > "looking the other way: excuse for Google. It should not be up to the > users to come up with all sort

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Custom domain issue

I've been thinking about an alternative for awhile now: HTML5 CORS feature (here's a nice example: http://www.html5rocks.com/en/tutorials/cors/) That, of course, highly depends on the app structure. This could work if the app is using Ajax to deliver actual content to the users. At least for br

[google-appengine] Re: We NEED notifications when the quota is near the end

Yeah, I do understand now those "large group of folks out there building applications .. that don't participate as much on the list." Greg mentioned. Probably something I'm gonna do too. On Monday, April 2, 2012 11:19:11 PM UTC+2, Emanuele Ziglioli wrote: > > > >

Re: [google-appengine] Re: We NEED notifications when the quota is near the end

Totally agree with you on "This isn't necessarily something that Google has to implement" What I'm saying is, there are already lots of handful features built-in. Every new line in the code unavoidably adds complexity (even for googlers, they are humans too) which, in turn, levels up chances o

[google-appengine] We NEED a GAE CoffeeMaker API when our local supplies are depleted

This morning I walked into my office only to find out that my black coffee supply was depleted. It's been about 4 years since GAE has been released to the public and yet, it is not capable of making me a black coffee! I've seen amazing new features being released recently all over Google prod

[google-appengine] Re: We NEED notifications when the quota is near the end

7;free' app while you get your > > quota sorted. > > We're talking about losing data for real customers here. > > > > On Apr 2, 9:17 pm, alex wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't re

[google-appengine] Re: We NEED notifications when the quota is near the end

I don't really understand you guys. Why implement some pool of "free apps" or asking for a feature like sms notif. Why not just enable billing, invest your valuable time in optimizing your app leveraging all that GAE offers already instead of implementing some creepy stuff like "free apps" fro

[google-appengine] Re: We NEED notifications when the quota is near the end

I don't really understand you guys. Why implement some pool of "free apps" or asking for a feature like sms notif. Why not just enable billing, invest your valuable time in optimizing your app leveraging all that GAE offers already instead of implementing some creepy stuff like "free apps" fro

[google-appengine] Re: We NEED notifications when the quota is near the end

I think you can implement this yourself by processing the headers e.g. in a cron job: https://developers.google.com/appengine/docs/python/runtime (Responses section, X-AppEngine-Resource-Usage) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" gr

[google-appengine] .proto files

ping... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/nqYaLNe9MDwJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To un

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >