Revision: 13488
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13488view=rev
Author: vouchcac
Date: 2010-01-06 08:31:20 + (Wed, 06 Jan 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-01-06 00:21 UTC-0800 Pritpal Bedi (prit...@vouchcac.com)
* contrib/hbide/hbide.prg
*
Hi Pritpal,
Log Message:
---
2010-01-06 00:21 UTC-0800 Pritpal Bedi (prit...@vouchcac.com)
* contrib/hbide/hbide.prg
* contrib/hbide/idedocks.prg
* contrib/hbide/idemisc.prg
* contrib/hbide/ideprojmanager.prg
! Many artifacts corrected.
! Build process is now very
Hi All
Only thought.
In example:
aArr := { 2, 0, 1, 0 }
? hb_RAScan( aArr, 0, 10 )
result is 0.
Does this not mean, that I agree with rascan'ing array even bigger
than in reality, so action must begin from real end of array ?
Best regards,
Saulius
To be consistent with HB_RAT(), I think it should.
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2010 Jan 6, at 09:56, Saulius Zrelskis wrote:
Hi All
Only thought.
In example:
aArr := { 2, 0, 1, 0 }
? hb_RAScan( aArr, 0, 10 )
result is 0.
Does this not mean, that I agree with rascan'ing array even bigger
than
Ubuntu 9.10 32bit ChangeLog 13488
Application Internal Error - /harbour_trunk/contrib/hbqt/tests/demoqt
Terminated at: 2010.01.06 10:16:07
Unrecoverable error 9023: hb_xgrab requested to allocate zero bytes
Called from
Can you post also a small sample
or modofy an existing to include follow function?
2010/1/6 dru...@users.sourceforge.net:
Revision: 13486
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13486view=rev
Author: druzus
Date: 2010-01-06 06:27:38 + (Wed, 06 Jan
+1
The most important things I expect is comfortable source
editor with column mark blocks, multi-file search and
replace, block copy and move operations between opened
source files. shortcuts for editing commands
--
Massimo Belgrano
___
Harbour
Right observation Viktor
Here same ide image
http://www.kodyaz.com/images/windows-7/vs2008/microsoft-visual-studio-2008-ide-integrated-development-environment.png
Wvt_DrawImage( 1,6,12,9, IMAGE.BMP)
but you also try xbase part
XbpBitmap() supported by hbxbp.lib gtwvg.lib
you can dind a sample
harbour/contrib/hbxbp/tests/demoxbp.prg
Please share here your result
2010/1/6 AbeB abe.b...@att.net:
Hi,
is it possible to draw an Image eather BMP/JPG in a
as subject.
Brgds,
Viktor
___
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
Thanks
Why is different from mandriva distribution?
Now you plan make binary for osx,fedora,suse?
2010/1/6 Viktor Szakáts harbour...@syenar.hu:
as subject.
--
Massimo Belgrano
___
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Hi Lorenzo,
Am I missing sth?
Fedora 12
---
Unrecoverable error 9023: hb_xgrab requested to allocate zero bytes
Called from QT_QEVENTLOOP_PROCESSEVENTS(0)
Called from QEVENTLOOP:PROCESSEVENTS(0) in ../../../TQEventLoop.prg
Called
Hi,
../../../hbznet.c:63:19: error: zutil.h: No such file or directory
../../../hbznet.c: In function _HB_ZNETSTREAM* hb_znetOpen(int, int):
../../../hbznet.c:107: error: DEF_MEM_LEVEL was not declared in this scope
make[3]: *** [hbznet.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [descend] Error 2
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Bisz István istvan.b...@t-online.hu wrote:
Solved with:
hbmk2 -nohbcppmm demoqt ...
hbmk2 -nohbcppmm demoxbp ...
for hbide the -nohbcppmm switch is unfortunately ineffective here, the
hbcppmm is generated and linked to hbide.
Many thanks István.
best
Hi,
The hbide crashes at the very end. The demoqt and demoxbp runs smoothly.
See blow the traces generated:
1. demoqt
Harbour Terminal: Windows dummy console for GUI programs
Harbour 2.0.1dev (Rev. 13487)
Windows Vista 6.0.6002 Service Pack 2
DS avail=1948668KB OS
Thanks Massimo.
Much appreciated.
Massimo Belgrano wrote:
Wvt_DrawImage( 1,6,12,9, IMAGE.BMP)
but you also try xbase part
XbpBitmap() supported by hbxbp.lib gtwvg.lib
you can dind a sample
harbour/contrib/hbxbp/tests/demoxbp.prg
Please share here your result
2010/1/6 AbeB
Hi All,
The hbmk2 –nohbcppmm is ineffective for hbide, so now we can’t test hbide on
linux, maybe it is specific just to Fedora12.
Please just be creative, and simply remove
-hbcppmm from hbqt.hbc locally to disable
this option. I'll look into it later.
BTW, C++ method override comes
Please just be creative, and simply remove -hbcppmm from hbqt.hbc locally
to disable this option. I'll look into it later.
OK. Thanks.
Best regards,
István
___
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
I got this while trying to create a 2.0.0 tgz for darwin (Snow Leopard):
---
[...]
./bin/postinst.sh
tar: Option --owner=root is not supported
Usage:
List:tar -tf archive-filename
Extract: tar -xf archive-filename
Create: tar -cf archive-filename [filenames...]
Help:tar --help
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
Hi,
BTW, C++ method override comes directly from QT
homepage, but nevertheless can be wrong or
outdated. Maybe some variations are missing.
Or it's possible that new/delete operator overloading works
perfectly and the problem is only in our own
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
Hi,
I got this while trying to create a 2.0.0 tgz for darwin (Snow Leopard):
---
[...]
./bin/postinst.sh
tar: Option --owner=root is not supported
Usage:
List:tar -tf archive-filename
Extract: tar -xf archive-filename
Create: tar -cf
Hi,
+ harbour/src/rtl/hbznet.c
+ added support for ZLIB compression in stream sockets.
Name of hb_znetInetInitialize() makes me think that this function should
be implemented in hbznet.c. I think hb_inet*() is a better namespace if
we can have more socket filters implemented using
Revision: 13489
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13489view=rev
Author: druzus
Date: 2010-01-06 16:16:22 + (Wed, 06 Jan 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-01-06 17:15 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
*
possible now create directories automatically if not there on the remote?
2010/1/6 dru...@users.sourceforge.net:
Revision: 13489
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13489view=rev
Author: druzus
Date: 2010-01-06 16:16:22 + (Wed, 06 Jan 2010)
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010, Massimo Belgrano wrote:
Hi,
possible now create directories automatically if not there on the remote?
Massimo, what is not clear in my ChangeLog entry?
I even updated NETIO server example and added to ChangeLog
demonstration code. Please don't be so fast and think a
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 5:16 PM, dru...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
* harbour/contrib/hbnetio/netio.h
* harbour/contrib/hbnetio/netiocli.c
* harbour/contrib/hbnetio/netiosrv.c
+ implemented RPC in HBNETIO protocol
...
Have a fun with a new toy. I hope that many Harbour user will
Hi,
List:tar -tf archive-filename
Extract: tar -xf archive-filename
Create: tar -cf archive-filename [filenames...]
Help:tar --help
wc: harbour-2.0.0-darwin.bin.tar.gz: open: No such file or directory
cat: harbour-2.0.0-darwin.bin.tar.gz: No such file or directory
---
You
Great feature. Thanks a lot for it.
Too smoothen the security edge of this feature,
maybe it would be nice to allow to limit the set
of functions made available through RPC on the
server side. This way programmer could have total
control over this aspect without worrying about
function being
So maybe the problem is that our malloc/realloc doesn't
handle zero size, while std version do.
In this case, we should probably allow zero size too.
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2010 Jan 6, at 18:46, Bisz István wrote:
Hi,
Finally, I was able to put in work the hbcppmm on Fedora12 by inserting the
Just tested it, and there are still gradient backgrounds
in Project properties dialog.
BTW, now clicking on any line of the project tree, will
select it, but it instantly loses focus, which makes it
feel strange.
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2010 Jan 6, at 09:31, vouch...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Thank you, thank you, thank you !!!
Did I thank you yet ?
This is a dream coming true !!!
Angel
___
Harbour mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB)
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
Viktor Szakáts escribió:
Great feature. Thanks a lot for it.
Too smoothen the security edge of this feature,
maybe it would be nice to allow to limit the set
of functions made available through RPC on the
server side. This way programmer could have total
control over this aspect without
Hi,
Maybe the following thread:
http://lists.trolltech.com/qt-interest/2000-09/thread3-0.html
contains the answer for your chew over this issue.
Best regards,
István
-Original Message-
From: harbour-boun...@harbour-project.org
[mailto:harbour-boun...@harbour-project.org] On
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
So maybe the problem is that our malloc/realloc doesn't
handle zero size, while std version do.
In this case, we should probably allow zero size too.
DLMALLOC malloc()/realloc() allow to use 0 bytes. Only inside
hb_xgrab()/hb_xalloc() we have code
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010, Lorenzo Fiorini wrote:
It's only important that the functions you want to execute are
linked with server code or where loaded dynamically. you can
even make sth like:
netio_procexec( HB_HRBLOAD, hb_memoread( mycode.hrb ) )
result := netio_funcexec( MYFUNC1, param1,
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
Too smoothen the security edge of this feature,
maybe it would be nice to allow to limit the set
of functions made available through RPC on the
server side. This way programmer could have total
control over this aspect without worrying about
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010, Szak�ts Viktor wrote:
Too smoothen the security edge of this feature,
maybe it would be nice to allow to limit the set
of functions made available through RPC on the
server side. This way programmer could have total
control over this aspect without worrying about
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010, Mindaugas Kavaliauskas wrote:
Hi,
Name of hb_znetInetInitialize() makes me think that this function
should be implemented in hbznet.c. I think hb_inet*() is a better
namespace if we can have more socket filters implemented using this
API.
OK, I'll change it.
Revision: 13490
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13490view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2010-01-06 20:13:24 + (Wed, 06 Jan 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-01-06 21:12 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* mpkg_tgz.sh
! Fixed
Hi Istvan,
The hbmk2 –nohbcppmm is ineffective for hbide, so now we can’t test hbide on
linux, maybe it is specific just to Fedora12.
To disable hbcppmm for hbide, pls try this command line:
hbmk2 hbide.hbp -nohbcppmm
The order of options is significant. If you issue -nohbcppmm
first, it
Revision: 13491
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13491view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2010-01-06 21:27:33 + (Wed, 06 Jan 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-01-06 22:26 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* INSTALL
! Fixed
Hi Przemek,
I am coming initially from an 8BIT world, my main task was until your
mailing list is to write things on a predefined processor in a completely
different world no linux no windows etc.
I am engaged on this list to implement a test software to my devices
historically started with
Hi Viktor,
For me is OK thank you, but we always should think about a general user.
Best regards,
István
-Original Message-
From: harbour-boun...@harbour-project.org
[mailto:harbour-boun...@harbour-project.org] On Behalf Of Viktor Szakáts
Sent: 2010. január 6. 22:27
To: Harbour
On 2010 Jan 6, at 22:54, Bisz István wrote:
Hi Viktor,
For me is OK thank you, but we always should think about a general user.
I don't understand you. It's also meant for general users,
it's simply how it works, and it's even logical.
If you put options on the command line they are
Hi Viktor,
We should made changes in a way that a general user isn't affected if it
is possible. This is a general rule in every system life cycle.
No problem we can handle it, as we are in development phase, forget it.
Best regards,
István
___
On 2010 Jan 6, at 23:11, Bisz István wrote:
Hi Viktor,
We should made changes in a way that a general user isn't affected if it
is possible. This is a general rule in every system life cycle.
No problem we can handle it, as we are in development phase, forget it.
Sorry I don't understand
Dear Viktor,
You are right, the first goal is the software quality, but don't forget that
there are peoples without so much knowledge about the inner things. Maybe
sometimes should be useful to put yourself in their position. But please
consider these words, without any negative intentions, as an
Dear Viktor,
You are right, the first goal is the software quality, but don't forget that
there are peoples without so much knowledge about the inner things. Maybe
I still can't see what your point is.
sometimes should be useful to put yourself in their position. But please
consider these
Revision: 13492
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13492view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2010-01-06 22:54:39 + (Wed, 06 Jan 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-01-06 23:53 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* contrib/hbwin/win_err.c
As I see, maybe undesirable, as this list is declared a developers' list,
but there are a lot of users in this list requesting knowledge from (us).
I don't know, but we are compulsively to serve them, but now we are far away
from our starting point. We should generate less protuberance in the
Hi,
All above functions use default connection set by NETIO_CONNECT()
for RPCs but it's also possible to specify server address and port
in cProcName/cFuncName just like in cFileName parameter in RDD
functions, i.e.:
NETIO_PROCEXISTS( 192.168.0.1:10005:MYFUNC )
Revision: 13493
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13493view=rev
Author: vszakats
Date: 2010-01-06 23:59:16 + (Wed, 06 Jan 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-01-07 00:52 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar.hu)
* contrib/hbwin/win_err.c
As I see, maybe undesirable, as this list is declared a developers' list,
but there are a lot of users in this list requesting knowledge from (us).
The fact that ppl are waiting for answers doesn't make this
a support list. We have support forums/lists which are meant to
solve these issues,
Why not release all 2.01?
imo TOMERGE 2.0 must be written in all 2.01 version
all hbide modify not have to merge 2.0 for example
IMO Merging is error
what part of 2.01 not be include in next release?
2010/1/7 Viktor Szakáts harbour...@syenar.hu:
For those interested in problem-free fixing of
Hi,
Przemysław Czerpak wrote:
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010, Lorenzo Fiorini wrote:
It's only important that the functions you want to execute are
linked with server code or where loaded dynamically. you can
even make sth like:
netio_procexec( HB_HRBLOAD, hb_memoread( mycode.hrb ) )
BTW a small
Hi,
Mindaugas Kavaliauskas wrote:
homework.prg (test module):
PROC main()
? netio_connect()
? NETIO_PROCEXISTS(HB_HRBLOAD)
? NETIO_PROCEXISTS(HELLO)
? NETIO_PROCEXECW(HB_HRBLOAD, HB_MEMOREAD(homework2.prg))
? NETIO_PROCEXISTS(HELLO)
? NETIO_FUNCEXEC(HELLO)
RETURN
Unfortunately test
Hi,
Przemysław Czerpak wrote:
P.S. BTW, was this your Christmas gift? :)
No, not yet and I do not know when I'll find time to finish it :-(
But you've just committed a RPC code, so, we must understand that
something even more great is waiting for us. :)
Regards,
Mindaugas
Revision: 13495
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13495view=rev
Author: vouchcac
Date: 2010-01-07 01:33:15 + (Thu, 07 Jan 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-01-06 17:10 UTC-0800 Pritpal Bedi (prit...@vouchcac.com)
*
Hi
P.S. BTW, was this your Christmas gift? :)
No, not yet and I do not know when I'll find time to finish it :-(
But you've just committed a RPC code, so, we must understand that
something even more great is waiting for us. :)
I can sense, out of the two: NETRDD or NETGT.
Revision: 13496
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13496view=rev
Author: vouchcac
Date: 2010-01-07 01:52:03 + (Thu, 07 Jan 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-01-06 17:53 UTC-0800 Pritpal Bedi (prit...@vouchcac.com)
*
Log Message:
---
2010-01-06 17:10 UTC-0800 Pritpal Bedi (prit...@vouchcac.com)
* contrib/hbide/projects/hbide.hbi
! Deleted hard-coded -o directive, no longer needed.
! Project paths are now shown without meta-dat.
* contrib/hbide/resources/projectproperties.ui
!
Hi
There is still gradient fill on toolbar and menu background.
I think it it presents a very good contrast, should not be a problem, IMO.
I'm also getting am RTE whenever I try to open a project
or I have it one open:
Message not found: HBIDE:LOADPROJECTPROPERTIES
How do you open ?
Thank you very much Przemek,
Yes I know, if we start 32,536 threads .-
Procedure Main()
Local i, nETS := Seconds()
? 'Begin in', nETS, 'System Seconds.'
wapi_SetLastError( 0 )
? 'Main Process'
for i := 1 to 32536
hb_threadStart( @thFunc(), i )
? 'Thread', i
next
Revision: 13497
http://harbour-project.svn.sourceforge.net/harbour-project/?rev=13497view=rev
Author: vouchcac
Date: 2010-01-07 02:58:58 + (Thu, 07 Jan 2010)
Log Message:
---
2010-01-06 18:57 UTC-0800 Pritpal Bedi (prit...@vouchcac.com)
*
Hi
Got hold of message after long, so the context is also old, but...
Viktor Szakáts wrote:
- I'd personally use much much less (or rather no) gradient effects as
backgrounds. It just slows down things (f.e. when working remote, or
VM) and it just distracting after the initial
Hello Przemek
Log Message:
---
2010-01-06 17:15 UTC+0100 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)
* harbour/src/rtl/hbznet.c
! do not use DEF_MEM_LEVEL to avoid potential problems when zutil.h
is not available
* harbour/contrib/hbnetio/netio.h
*
Just a report, probably it has a known issue. To reproduce:
- click on the browse
- using mouse wheel or down arrow try to go past the last row
- you'll get a runtime error message
- click ok
- the segfault
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0xb6c87710 (LWP
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010, Mindaugas Kavaliauskas wrote:
Hi,
Mindaugas Kavaliauskas wrote:
homework.prg (test module):
PROC main()
? netio_connect()
? NETIO_PROCEXISTS(HB_HRBLOAD)
? NETIO_PROCEXISTS(HELLO)
? NETIO_PROCEXECW(HB_HRBLOAD, HB_MEMOREAD(homework2.prg))
?
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010, Mindaugas Kavaliauskas wrote:
Hi,
PROC main()
? netio_connect()
? NETIO_PROCEXISTS(STR)
RETURN
prints:
.T.
.T.
but
PROC main()
? NETIO_PROCEXISTS(127.0.0.1:2941:STR)
RETURN
prints:
.F.
What I'm missing?
It's working for me in my Linux box so I can only
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010, Bisz István wrote:
Hi,
In may analyzis of the assemble code of the:
if ( nSize == 0 ) nSize = 1;,
was more efficient that:
if ( !size ) size++;
at least with Keil C compiler for Dallas DS80C320, how do you think? Thank
you in advance.
Yes in most of CPUs it's faster
On Thu, 07 Jan 2010, Xavi wrote:
Hi,
I agree with that current code committed by Viktor is better but
disagree with don't have acces to repository and update my code
directly.
I hope Viktor add you to developer list soon.
Please only try to remember that we cannot check each commit so
try be
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010, Pritpal Bedi wrote:
Hi,
I can sense this commit is the basis for NETRDD or NETGT of future.
Am I right ?
It can be useful for both but in fact it's side effect of some other
job not directly related to Harbour.
Anyhow I plan to work on GTNET in the nearest future so above
Hi,
Thank you for the clarification.
Best regards,
István
-Original Message-
From: harbour-boun...@harbour-project.org
[mailto:harbour-boun...@harbour-project.org] On Behalf Of Przemyslaw Czerpak
Sent: 2010. január 7. 7:42
To: Harbour Project Main Developer List.
Subject: Re: [Harbour]
Hi
Lorenzo Fiorini-2 wrote:
Just a report, probably it has a known issue. To reproduce:
- click on the browse
- using mouse wheel or down arrow try to go past the last row
- you'll get a runtime error message
- click ok
- the segfault
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation
Hi
Przemysław Czerpak wrote:
Anyhow I plan to work on GTNET in the nearest future so above code
should greatly help.
I could not hear a better with than above few words, for 2010.
Regards
Pritpal Bedi
--
View this message in context:
Very good news!
can we plan promote a 2.1 with GTnet and hbide is some month?
2010/1/7 Przemysław Czerpak dru...@acn.waw.pl:
On Wed, 06 Jan 2010, Pritpal Bedi wrote:
Hi,
I can sense this commit is the basis for NETRDD or NETGT of future.
Am I right ?
It can be useful for both but in
76 matches
Mail list logo
