I think this will serve as an excellent test for the local contingency plans
for catastrophic failrues. As an example, as the VA moves more and more
toward centralizing their databases, this sort of thing becomes more and more
of serious an issue. This is one of the reasons that I am not in
The PowerPC (from IBM) is the hardware platform used for the
Macintosh today.
===
Gregory Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A practical man is a man who practices the errors of his
forefathers. -- Benjamin Disraeli
On Aug 31, 2005, at 10:54 PM, Roy Gaber wrote:
Interpretation please.
Thanks for all the list of phone numbers. I will forward it to my sister.
I just found out this morning that my brother-in-laws family (uncles, aunts,
cousins, nieces and nephews) all lost their homes in New Orleans. Now they
are all living with my sister in Houston. I just hope that these
Taskman and VistA tasked options can be enhanced to support the
functionality that you mention Bhaskar. However, the job is monumental.
All existing processes that queued to Taskman would have to be reexamined
and mot like rewritten. Taskman would have to be enhanced to automatically
restart
The MUMPS language includes a BREAK command, which is simply an
explicit breakpoint for debugging. (There are other ways of setting
breakpoints, too). According to VA coding standards, this command is
not allowed in released code, so someone must have put it there and
neglected to remove it.
"Open Source Project Aims at Middleware" InformationWeek (08/29/05); Babcock, CharlesCompanies' increasing dependence on middleware has led to an open source movement from the Apache Software Foundation, known as Synapse, that could eventually challenge commercial applications such as IBM's
This is certainly a good point, but it's really not a matter of
either/or. It is quite possible to use a distributed storage model (and
remain reasonably efficient as well), without losing the ability to
tolerate network failures and even operate off-line for extended
periods of time.
I've long
That part I got, I use a PPC G5. It was the what else runs on the PPC
that I was confused about, perhaps you were asking what other OS's run
on it?
- Original Message -
From: Gregory Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thursday, September 1, 2005 7:13 am
Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members]
Hardhats:
The following information was provided by Jim Callahan at my request for
help in answereing Rusty Maynard's question earlier. Jim represents FDA on
Clinical Lab Standards Institute committees on Lab Automation and
Informatics Standards in DC. He may be a source useful to the World
Um, actually that BREAK is in %ZOSV on purpose. That's currently how the
Programmer mode option gets you to programmer mode from MenuMan in GT.M.
Note that it's not an error message but an Information message.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Hi my name is Samuel and i am trying to run the last
version of OpenVista Semiviva in GTM version 5.00
but i can't loggin as a programmer when i arrive to
programmer mode it is giving me an error. I will
show
you the error:
___
KIDS
Precisely. I was wondering whether porting GT.M to the PPC platform
could benefit those running operating systems other than OS X.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That part I got, I use a PPC G5. It was the what else runs on the
PPC
that I was confused about, perhaps you were asking what other
I guess she means Application Server Provider.
Alberto
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] En nombre de Greg
Woodhouse
Enviado el: Jueves, 01 de Septiembre de 2005 09:45 a.m.
Para: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net
Asunto: Re: [Hardhats-members] We DO
VA has taken a rather laissez faire approach to how applications are to
insure their processes are able to withstand forced shutdowns. Since the
functions the applications are performing are guided by end users in
collaboration with their system management staff, the processes that must
have
I guess I don't understand your point here.
It's not that local maintenance of data is a great burden, bur rather
that if you ever need access to it from another facility it's not
available. I know many people here feel like that's the way things
should be, but that's a different issue. My point
Got it.
National Health Insurance model suggests
a few regional management centers that handle
ALL citizen's health care records.
(accomplishment of this model is remote but
at least it's an idea.)
And if a californian moves to Florida, their
data are to be 'transferred' to Florida's
regional
That being said,
maintaining all data locally (without any synchronization or sharing)
is, in my opinion, unnecessarily extreme.
Not to be a smart A**, but we are living in the extreme.
and local maintenance of data is not big a deal.
Regular sync should be done.
J.
Ah, yes. I guess wasn't paying attention to where it was.
--- Cameron Schlehuber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Um, actually that BREAK is in %ZOSV on purpose. That's currently how
the
Programmer mode option gets you to programmer mode from MenuMan in
GT.M.
Note that it's not an error message
I hope I did not make people think I am supporting one or the other. I am in
favor of both. I feel that if it is a small clinic, it should have remote
backup perhaps with the primary server local. If it is an ASP sort of
situation, then I think the ASP might provide the primary server but
It is technically feasible to do so, but of course, the redundancy you
describe would have to be incorporated into the design.
--- jae kim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Got it.
National Health Insurance model suggests
a few regional management centers that handle
ALL citizen's health care
The OS is AIX, and I have the ability to print to a disk file. And
that seems to be the way that I'll have to get the data out.
I was thinking about tackling this project again for awhile, but I
think I am going to put it on the back burner again.
Thanks!
Kevin
On 9/1/05, Thurman Pedigo
I may not be userstanding what you want, but wouldn't this code do it?
UPDATE(gref,A,B)
set @gref@(A)=B
quit
Kevin
On 9/1/05, Gregory Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible in Cache and/or GT.M to create something like a Perl
array that has been tied to a class
I know about subscript indirection, and frequently use it just as you
describe. But this time I'm after something different: an equivalent
to tie in Perl. Essentially, I want to TRANSPARENTLY arrange for a
global set (no indirection) to be implemented as a function call. It
may not be
23 matches
Mail list logo
