On Jul 8, 2005, at 5:46 AM, Tim Ellison wrote:
Can we reach a concensus on getting something started on Windows/
x86 and Linux/i386 initially (as the popular development platforms)?
On 7/10/05, Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That works for me, but we'll be adding OS X as
I'm focused on bringing our legal framework issues to conclusion. (I
have a long flight today, so expect to see something COB today...)
However, there's an issue that's been brought to my attention from
several people, and I wish propose that we explicitly state our
mailing list policies,
I agree with doing this. Ideally it is something that would appear on
the Foundation website, i.e. not just for Project Harmony, but making it
a clear policy is certainly the right thing to do.
FWIW the IETF do an equivalent thing (http://www.ietf.org/maillist.html)
and even have it written on a
On Jul 13, 2005, at 11:26 AM, Tim Ellison wrote:
I agree with doing this. Ideally it is something that would appear on
the Foundation website, i.e. not just for Project Harmony, but
making it
a clear policy is certainly the right thing to do.
Yes - I'm going to help get an ASF-wide
NOT A CONTRIBUTION
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I propose the following is added to the top of the mailing list page on
the site (I've added and published, currently marked as proposed) and
included in the welcome message for each subscriber, and posted once a
month to all lists as part of a
Akhilesh Shirbhate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/12/2005
05:18:20 AM:
Can we have a look at the vmi.h and the list of 18 classes, and
specially the two classes required for integration ?
As a follow-up to Tim Ellison's response let me provide more detail on
J9's VM Interface (VMI) and Kernel
On Jul 13, 2005, at 1:32 PM, Leo Simons wrote:
NOT A CONTRIBUTION
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
I propose the following is added to the top of the mailing list
page on
the site (I've added and published, currently marked as proposed)
and
included in the welcome message for each subscriber,
PJ == PJ Cabrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
PJ And a big problem it is. If we go with GNU Classpath as the basis of
PJ the Harmony API, AWT and Swing will depend on GTK+ 2.4 being installed
PJ on OSX, through DarwinPorts or Fink.
There is nothing stopping anybody from writing peers that work on
But i would say these are few things that are though to common to all of us
but it is better to be arranged that if some novice are coming then they can
not damage our intentions and put us into some legal issues.
thnx again geir
On 7/13/05, Mark Wielaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
NOT A CONTRIBUTION*
Mark Wielaard wrote:
Just one little nitpick.
Heh.
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 10:22 -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
The terms and conditions that apply to
your Contributions are defined by either a contributor license
agreement (CLA) signed by you and/or your employer
Now for OS X, you can do a nice set of peers implementing all the above on
Aqua.
Sorry, I meant Quartz of course, not Aqua.
/Sven
Hi,
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 21:50 +0200, Leo Simons wrote:
NOT A CONTRIBUTION*
LIKEWISE.
Mark Wielaard wrote:
Just one little nitpick.
Heh.
Could we not use the Apache License, Version 2.0. But state something
like are in the public domain. (Or use APL/GPL-dual license, LGPL,
CACAO 0.92 Tomclipse released.
Long time ago since our last release (Dec. 23rd, 2004), but the
changes we made took that long. Here is a short list of the most
important changes:
* runtime lazy-loading with code patching
* dynamic library loading on every platform we support (using
Seems good to me.
One question as I am curious: isn't it enough just to state by the terms
and conditions of Contributions as defined by the Apache License, Version
2.0.?
Cheers,
RB
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005
14 matches
Mail list logo
