On 26 May 2006 at 17:32, "Mikhail Loenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> P.S. Thanks to Mark!
I was feeling guilty for being pedantic!
I agree we should switch these... especially in light of the Eclipse
compile problem with the current default.
-Mark.
> 2006/5/26, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECT
P.S. Thanks to Mark!
2006/5/26, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
ant -Dhy.rmi.module=rmi3 -f make/build.xml
works now, the next step is make
ant -Dhy.rmi.module=rmi -f make/build.xml
work as agreed.
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/5/25, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> Mark Hindess wro
ant -Dhy.rmi.module=rmi3 -f make/build.xml
works now, the next step is make
ant -Dhy.rmi.module=rmi -f make/build.xml
work as agreed.
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/5/25, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Mark Hindess wrote:
> On 24 May 2006 at 12:50, "Mikhail Loenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mark Hindess wrote:
On 24 May 2006 at 12:50, "Mikhail Loenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As a first step I suggest taking it as a base - move rmi to rmi4 or
whatever and move rmi3 to rmi.
This is fine with me but, being slightly pedantic, I think that's the
second step. The first step is
On 24 May 2006 at 12:50, "Mikhail Loenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2006/5/24, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 5/24/06, Mikhail Loenko wrote:
> > >
> > > 2006/5/24, Geir Magnusson Jr :
> > > > I'd like to propose that we choose what we judge to be the best
> > > > RMI implementation,
2006/5/24, Stepan Mishura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 5/24/06, Mikhail Loenko wrote:
>
> 2006/5/24, Geir Magnusson Jr :
> > I'd like to propose that we choose what we judge to be the best RMI
> > implementation, and the best math implementation now so we can move
> > forward, with the understanding t
On 5/24/06, Mikhail Loenko wrote:
2006/5/24, Geir Magnusson Jr :
> I'd like to propose that we choose what we judge to be the best RMI
> implementation, and the best math implementation now so we can move
> forward, with the understanding that anyone interested can continue to
> work to merge th
I think that contribution authors and everyone who is interested in the areas
will control that their best ideas go to the merged version.
It seems that we do not need a special document about that
Thanks,
Mikhail
2006/5/24, Vladimir Gorr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Who will control the accuracy of t
Who will control the accuracy of this process (I mean merging)?
Obviously we need to have the document substantiating that or other choice.
What do you think?
Thanks,
Vladimir.
On 5/24/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
2006/5/24, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'd like to
2006/5/24, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I'd like to propose that we choose what we judge to be the best RMI
implementation, and the best math implementation now so we can move
forward, with the understanding that anyone interested can continue to
work to merge the additional contributio
I'd like to propose that we choose what we judge to be the best RMI
implementation, and the best math implementation now so we can move
forward, with the understanding that anyone interested can continue to
work to merge the additional contributions into whatever was chosen.
We then get out of
On 5/17/06, Daniel Fridlender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
After a discussion we had a few weeks ago in this forum on the
different implementations of java.math donated to Harmony
(Harmony-(39+380) and Harmony-199) we (ITC) decided to voluteer for
the task of integrating them into a single im
Daniel Gandara wrote:
> Tim Ellison wrote
>> Mark Hindess wrote:
>>> On 17 May 2006 at 12:30, "Daniel Gandara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> wrote:
Mark Hindess wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> I've just contributed a JIRA,
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-471
> that integrate
Hi Mark,
On 5/17/06, Daniel Gandara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mark Hindess wrote:
>
> It would be quite trivial to do the same for the math implementations
> (and crypto I suppose). If we were to do this, perhaps the process of
> analysis and creation of a combined implementation could be done
Tim Ellison wrote
Mark Hindess wrote:
On 17 May 2006 at 12:30, "Daniel Gandara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Mark Hindess wrote:
Daniel,
I've just contributed a JIRA,
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-471
that integrates the ITC rmi implementation as modules/rmi. (The jsr14
version
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Mark Hindess wrote:
On 17 May 2006 at 12:30, "Daniel Gandara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Mark Hindess wrote:
Daniel,
I've just contributed a JIRA,
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-471
that integrates the ITC rmi implementation as modules/rmi. (The jsr14
Mark Hindess wrote:
> On 17 May 2006 at 12:30, "Daniel Gandara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Mark Hindess wrote:
>>> Daniel,
>>>
>>> I've just contributed a JIRA,
>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-471
>>> that integrates the ITC rmi implementation as modules/rmi. (The jsr14
>>> ve
Mark Hindess wrote:
On 17 May 2006 at 12:30, "Daniel Gandara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Mark Hindess wrote:
>
> Daniel,
>
> I've just contributed a JIRA,
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-471
> that integrates the ITC rmi implementation as modules/rmi. (The jsr14
> version. Only
Daniel Gandara wrote:
Mark Hindess wrote:
Daniel,
I've just contributed a JIRA,
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-471
that integrates the ITC rmi implementation as modules/rmi. (The jsr14
version. Only the code at the moment, I creating the scripts/patches
for the tests next.)
Mark Hindess wrote:
On 17 May 2006 at 12:30, "Daniel Gandara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mark Hindess wrote:
Daniel,
I've just contributed a JIRA,
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-471
that integrates the ITC rmi implementation as modules/rmi. (The jsr14
version. Only the code
On 17 May 2006 at 12:30, "Daniel Gandara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mark Hindess wrote:
> >
> > Daniel,
> >
> > I've just contributed a JIRA,
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-471
> > that integrates the ITC rmi implementation as modules/rmi. (The jsr14
> > version. Only the c
Mark Hindess wrote:
Daniel,
I've just contributed a JIRA,
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-471
that integrates the ITC rmi implementation as modules/rmi. (The jsr14
version. Only the code at the moment, I creating the scripts/patches
for the tests next.)
We've been working on
Daniel,
I've just contributed a JIRA,
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-471
that integrates the ITC rmi implementation as modules/rmi. (The jsr14
version. Only the code at the moment, I creating the scripts/patches
for the tests next.)
In this JIRA, I modified the build ant file
23 matches
Mail list logo
