I have BugZilla set up on a subdomain. I personally do not like how it
looks. I messed with it a little and said screw it, though I have never
messed with BugZilla before. Erik, if you would like to config it and make
it usable contact me offlist and I will set you up with Admin on it. It is
hosted
That site isn't the new system, but it is a similar theme to what we
want.
Suck. wrote:
> I believe that the Friends 3 beta wiki may be part of the new bug
> reporting
> system that Valve is designing, as described by Alfred. It can be
> found
> here:
>
> http://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/F
On Feb 6, 2006, at 7:02 PM, Suck. wrote:
I believe that the Friends 3 beta wiki may be part of the new bug
reporting
system that Valve is designing, as described by Alfred. It can be
found
here:
I had offered to do this, and even got a few requests regarding it.
I'm however moving this week,
I believe that the Friends 3 beta wiki may be part of the new bug reporting
system that Valve is designing, as described by Alfred. It can be found
here:
http://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/Friends_Beta
-Grant.
___
To unsubscribe, edit your lis
To Quote Alfred:
> We do have a project internally that is working on providing a site
> like this for you to use, but I do not know the timeframe or
> capabilities of the site (it is part of a general package of work in
> the customer support area). Having an external site could certainly
> help i
Valve didn't say that making your own will not work out. Perhaps
nobody would trust it, but that's their problem. Alfred did say he'd
attempt to use it if we implemented it, and I see no problem with
someone getting one up and running. I'd really rather keep this off my
dedicated box, and I know at
Valve said they are working on one and making your own will not work
out, nobody would trust it. Read the whole thread for more (I know
its very long).
Best Regards,
Stan
On 2/6/06, Tim McLennan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, so... who's running this, and where?
> If no one is releasing a url,
Ok, so... who's running this, and where?
If no one is releasing a url, I guess I could host one, as IMO it's a good idea.
Regards,
Tim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alfred Reynolds
Sent: January 18, 2006 05:26 PM
To: hlds_linux@li
I can't tell you a definite reason that it's happening, but I can give
you an idea. Seeing as I'm on a satellite connection, when I SSH to my
server and reattach to my screen session, my satellite sometimes will
stop receiving data for about 30 seconds or so from my server. What
this does to the pr
How about some more information like operating system, CPU speed, RAM,
and anything else that might be relevant, such as your kernel polling
frequency.
On 2/6/06, Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
> --
> [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Well then the answer is no. I can't think of a legitimate reason
you'd want to do this, and even if you could give me one it doesn't
mitigate the fact that things would likely break horribly. If you
hacked the server to allow it somehow, either by removing the version
check on the hlds side or ch
grep on our main servers logs and came up with
160 Client timed out in logs from 1/20 to 2/06
29 of them today
something is going on, I am glad to see it's not just our servers though.
so many damn bugs including VAC not loading more then half the time on
server restarts
Subject: [hlds_linux]
I've heard a few mentioning of strange goings on this evening too but
didn't
think anything of it until, well, now :P
Are many people being affected by this?
I had this on my server and almost everyone timed out at some point even
after a server restart :(.
BoN
- Original Message -
F
I've heard a few mentioning of strange goings on this evening too but didn't
think anything of it until, well, now :P
Are many people being affected by this?
- Original Message -
From: "Saint K." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 8:37 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] C
IS this related to this message i keep hearing about from our players?
You have been Dissconnected from the server. reason : Client timed out while
answering challenge.
Saint K.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 8:46 PM
Subject: Re: [hl
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Hi all,
Is it possible to run two servers on a dual Xeon server, and have a stable
333 FPS for both SRCDS instances, or is 333 FPS TOTAL for all the srcds_i686
processes on the server?eshow experie
I've also noticed this on many cs 1.6 servers.
Jon Dawson
Londinivm Productions
www.londinivm.com
- Original Message -
From: "Bart King" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 7:08 PM
Subject: [hlds_linux] Client timed out
Hi all,
Apologises if this has been discusse
Oh no... You do use cracked (hexed) linux libraries, so you aren't so
innocent m? You know that people can connect because you downloaded some
engine files and use sv_lan 1 :).
It would be nie to see VALVe doing some licensed stuff about admins using
prehacked binnaries of something :).
- Ori
Go to USA. Peole there play legal games :).
Besides, that most off the people play illegal games is not an option for
supporting piracy.
- Original Message -
From: "Dmitriy Gorbenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: [hlds_linux] This server is
Hi all,
Apologises if this has been discussed before, but hey.
Recently I've noticed a lot of clients randomly disconnecting from the
server with the reason "Client timed out", even though they were running
along, guns blazing before getting dropped.
Counter-Strike: Source, 40 players, UK serve
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
As about me, I could buy a legal copy of CS client.
But I am not a fan of this kind of games.
Can I ask one question: how much mailing members are using illegal copy ?
Well, Thanks to all.
Peter Kirby wrote:
> On 06/02/06, Dmitriy Gorbenko <[EMAIL PR
On 06/02/06, Erik Hollensbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Feb 6, 2006, at 6:52 AM, Peter Kirby wrote:
>
> > On 06/02/06, Dmitriy Gorbenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> And, besides, I am not an a criminal man - dedicated servers from
> >> Valve are free spread software.
> >> Are my clients, w
On Feb 6, 2006, at 6:52 AM, Peter Kirby wrote:
On 06/02/06, Dmitriy Gorbenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And, besides, I am not an a criminal man - dedicated servers from
Valve are free spread software.
Are my clients, which want to play CS, are criminals ? Maybe yes.
But, this is Ukraine (as R
Besides that.. If you have to pay $2 to buy the new version of the game
every time an update comes out, you will hit that $19 mark within a
year, keeping Valve's frequency of updates in mind. Might as well get a
proper version and save yourself the headache.
Peter Kirby wrote:
On 06/02/06, Dmit
On 06/02/06, Dmitriy Gorbenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And, besides, I am not an a criminal man - dedicated servers from Valve are
> free spread software.
> Are my clients, which want to play CS, are criminals ? Maybe yes.
> But, this is Ukraine (as Russian like), and no one here will pay $19
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
>> to wait next time
What you mean ?
And, besides, I am not an a criminal man - dedicated servers from Valve are
free spread software.
Are my clients, which want to play CS, are criminals ? Maybe yes.
But, this is Ukraine (as Russian like), and no o
Would be a prety good guess, I'd say.
Legal copies of Valve software can be simply bought online, I don't think
the Ukraine is an exception to that possibility. But frankly, that's not
Valves problem, and I can't say I'm sorry for them atleast trying to
prohibit the use of 'nntp'-copies.
I guess
What is stopping you, and all the criminals that you wish to host for, from
buying the game online with SteamPowered.com?
The updates are mostly mandatory (maybe the odd one isn't) - meaning 0
support for older versions.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
Well, what can I say...
I live in Ukraine, the country where legal and recent copy of Valve
software is rare thing.
So, as I understand, Vavle did not provide support for out-of-date clients ?
Reinder P. Gerritsen writes:
> Okay, Clear.
>
> Now I run
On 04/02/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Different story for me, we run an AMD64 3000, 2GB DDR, 120GB SATA which we
> rent from INX and is located at RedBus Server Farm in London running FC4, on
> this box we run 2 1.3 DoD Servers and 2 DoD:S Servers, i tried the swapbeta
> on on
On 06/02/06, Reinder P. Gerritsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, Clear.
>
> Now I run - and I think most of us do - a CS Source server, and I realy
> can't come up with a reason that you so desperately require support for an
> older protocol version.
I can only think of one. And it's already b
Okay, Clear.
Now I run - and I think most of us do - a CS Source server, and I realy
can't come up with a reason that you so desperately require support for an
older protocol version.
Afaik you simply require the latest srcds just to be able to run the most
recent map changes. Anyone with a legal
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--
This is source. Counter-Strike: Source Linux dedicated server.
What mod ? It's pure CS: Source server:
./srcds_run -game cstrike -insecure -nomaster +sv_lan 1 +maxplayers 18
+map de_dust
Stan Bubrouski writes:
> Is this hl1 engine or source and what
What are you bashing Taler about on that?
Since the specific question by stan that you quote, Dmitriy hasn't replied
to the list yet, so I miss the point in getting upset like you do?
On another note, I have to smile aswell when someone points out the only
probable reason for this question so deli
34 matches
Mail list logo
