Here it comes, the ubiquitous:
I told you so. ;)
$1 Billion? You've got to be fucking kidding me
StanTheMan
rcon admin at:
Beer for Breakfast servershttp://bfb.bogleg.org/
66.111.111.66:27015 (CS multi-map)
66.111.111.66:27016 (CS militia/dust2)Dallas, TX
In any case, I guess this dashes my dream of running 500 instances of
HLDS on the 390 I have at the office ;-
That, and the fact that the S390 processing complex wouldn't have enough
horsepower to run 500 HLDS servers (unless they were like 4 player servers).
And, assuming at least 64MB per
my thoughts:
IP:PORT from the network-package AFTER NAT
for example my server has ip 192.168.1.3, port 27015. Now the
router get's
the package and changes the ip to my online-ip and uses a random port.
So the server apears at the masterlist, but with a wrong
port. So connecting
via
How does the won/masterserver get the port? Is the sending-port used
(which is after NAT not the port the server is listening)?
Valve would have the authoritative answer on this.
If observation of the behavior of the WON servers is a correct indicator,
then yes, the WON server strips and uses
Just caught wind of this:
http://ir.sco.com/ReleaseDetail.cfm?ReleaseID=99965
It looks like SCO is gearing up to sue everyone using Linux into paying for
Unix licenses, since SCO owns the Unix source code. If you look at this:
http://www.sco.com/scosource/unixtree/unixhistory01.html, it appears
hrmm, there's nothing in there about suing linux users, nor is there
anything that even remotely closely resembles an urge to do so.
Ok, before the next person says this same thing, look carefully at this part
of the press release:
The appointment of David Boies and the law firm of Boies,
Anyone else notice an influx of aimbots on their servers recently? Like in
the last week or so?
Our admin mailing list and IRC channel have been pretty quiet lately, until
this past weekish period. All of a sudden, we're banning aimbotters
left/right, emails are flying among admins, and people
Thx for all the suggestions and help gentlemen.
Two additional questions:
1. Why does Debian (Potato and Woody) not seem to include iputils in a
default net install? I've had to install traceroute and tracepath manually
on all 3. Strange these handy (and nesessary) little tools aren't part
http://www.avforums.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=56924
Useful information for those with heat issues in 1U cases and are
thinking about water cooling as a solution.
I think he lied during forum registration. He's got to be from Poland, not
Ireland, to do something like that. Then
(Somebody want to explain what that means - Stan?)
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=KB;en-us;q247904
That article explains the windows terminal services problem thoroughly. Why
are we discussing a microsoft OS memory management problem on this list?
Oh, maybe memory management
Xeons could be better. They're not just an SMP capable P4.
Ahh, but that's exactly what the new Xeon is-- an SMP capable P4. The only
differences are SMP and the optional L3 cache sizes (and hyperthreading,
although the latest--3Ghz--P4 has it also). Also keep in mind that the
XeonDP doesn't
I want to know who at valve I can talk to about either
getting some binaries complied or possibly, starting a new
MIPS and SPARC linux port which I would like to assume
responsibility for. Does anyone here know who I could
possibly contact at valve? Is it best to just email
[EMAIL
I would tend to disagree. If you rewrite it from scratch, why
shouldn't
you be able to benefit from concurrent execution?
It might benefit. I just don't think that a significant portion of the
processing load could be done concurrently...maybe it could. Maybe spawn a
thread to handle the
)
209.41.98.2:27017 (CS militia/dust2)Dallas, TX
- Original Message -
From: Stan Hoeppner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 9:08 AM
Subject: RE: [hlds_linux] Unix on Sparc CPUs (sun Station)
|
| From the list archive (actually *my
I would greatly appreciate anyone's help on this. I don't have install
source (no burner =\) for Debian. I've always done my installs with boot
disks and the mirrors. And, I've never installed onto a hardware RAID
controller array (just IDE and plain SCSI).
So, the boot disks I have, compact,
I'm reading all these interesting methods for gaming clusters
and such,
but after all the information coming in, it still seems like a single,
multi-CPU machine would be better for these types of tasks.
Is this not
the case?
I would tend to agree.
It seems like it'd be cheaper, too,
Yeah, thats wrong. I read the FAQ before I started but I'm still not
sure how networking works. I guess any process I start even if its
migrated to another system keeps the IP of its parent node? So, data
would come into the parent node then be forwarded to wherever the
process is?
As
I would never have considered running AMDs in a 1u rack
mount regardless.
but if you did, I could see that heat could become a small problem,
especially if you cramming a few high speed HDDs into that
small space as
well. Satndard mini tower with front and back fans seems
to run at
Anyone out there using TEC modules (Thermo-electric cooling
AKA Peltier
device) ? I am really looking into it for a dual P3 system.
About the only people using peltiers are serious overclockers. If you put
them inside a server (especially a small one like 1U or 2U), they'll have to
be
Internet server, or LAN server? If internet server, what is the size of the
internet pipe?
StanTheMan
TheHardwareFreak
http://www.hardwarefreak.com
rcon admin at:
Beer for Breakfast servershttp://bfb.bogleg.org/
209.41.98.2:27016 (CS multi-map) 209.41.98.2:27015 (DoD)
You'll need (stan?) about 3x the airflow to keep this monster
at a decent temperature.
I won't even guess at a ratio. I just wouldn't run peltiers in a server at
all, especially a 1U or 2U.
Most Peltier using overclockers tend to couple them with
water cooling as its
heat carrying
I'd like to know how Ryan came up with 50 milliseconds of latency for GiGE.
As m0gely points out, GiGE has a latency measured in *micro* seconds
(millionths of a second) in a switched LAN environment.
Hell, 100BaseTX and 10BaseT have latency in the lower microsecond range
(which is obviously sub
So would openmosix be able to spread an hlds process over
multiple cpus in
one computer?
Didn't I already answer this question? The answer is NO. NO. NO. Mosix
can distribute multiple HLDS processes to different CPUs, depending on the
load each HLDS process is generating. Mosix works
And yes, a single HLDS server IS running on two separate
CPU's.
It is running on both CPUs, but NOT CONCURRENTLY. What the graph is showing
(due to the data capturing method, I assume) is that the single HLDS process
is being bounced from one CPU to another. As this bouncing can occur every
yeah works fine in combination with qstat. had a quick setup and
I'll enhance the site with cpu, ram and nic stats due to this
topic ;-)
http://www.igazo.de/mrtg
P.S. I prefer mrtg's graphs (rrdtools graphs are ugly :-)))
Ok, the URL points to a graph. The vertical legend of the graph
Personally, I kinda like this one (for CS):
http://bfb.bogleg.org/status.pl?s=bfb-cs2
;)
StanTheMan
TheHardwareFreak
http://www.hardwarefreak.com
rcon admin at:
Beer for Breakfast servershttp://bfb.bogleg.org/
209.41.98.2:27016 (CS multi-map) 209.41.98.2:27015 (DoD)
Well apparently it affected your ability to cheat enough that it prompted
you to send this email. Just wait till Valve improves it.
Soon, you and your cheating buddies will be out of business. What will you
do then? Attempt to mail flood every admin on this list, Karl? Or, wait,
is Karl one
Stan, the numbers along the bottom of the graph are times of
the day. It
becomes more clear when you click the graph and the entire
MRTG history page
shows up. It's a standard MRTG x axis quantity.
Edge100x
Ahh. Thx. Didn't realize the image was linked, heh.
Stan
28 matches
Mail list logo
