[hugin-ptx] Re: issue with libpano13 CMake build (SVN1082)

Am Samstag 26 September 2009 schrieb Yuval Levy: > today seems to be my lucky day: > > $ cmake ../libpano13 -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr/local > -DCPACK_BINARY_DEB:BOOL=ON -DCPACK_BINARY_NSIS:BOOL=OFF \ > > > -DCPACK_BINARY_RPM:BOOL=OFF -DCPACK_BINARY_STGZ:BOOL=OFF > > -DCPACK_BINARY_TBZ2:BOOL=OFF

[hugin-ptx] Re: Canon 7D or SONY Alpha 850 - which one would you buy?

On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 10:51 PM, RizThon wrote: > > I don't understand why using a FF you'll have a better shallow depth of > field effet? I have a 50mm 1.4 (but a 1.8 would already be enough) and it > gives me great portrait...honestly, I just *love* that lens, and I can > always at once tell t

[hugin-ptx] Re: Canon 7D or SONY Alpha 850 - which one would you buy?

As for Canon VS Nikon lenses, unless you prefer a body from one or the other brand, I feel like Nikon bodies and lenses are more expensive...I still own a Nikon though and probably won't change because of the few lenses I already have. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You rece

[hugin-ptx] Re: Canon 7D or SONY Alpha 850 - which one would you buy?

On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 04:21, Yuval Levy wrote: > > Tim Nugent wrote: > > What do you need the high FPS for Yuv? > fast moving subjects. action! > So that wouldn't really be for taking panoramas I guess ^^ Also be carefull, sometimes it's written something like "7 images per seconds *" and when

[hugin-ptx] Re: Canon 7D or SONY Alpha 850 - which one would you buy?

Hi Daniel, I just tried Live View on the D3. No impact on the mirror lock up. Too bad. At high speed, it can induce significant camera shake. Rick On Sep 27, 6:46 am, dmg wrote: > > Definitely disappointing that camera manufacturers still have not > > caught on to increased dynamic range wor

[hugin-ptx] Re: issue with libpano13 CMake build (SVN1082)

Hullo Yuv, On Sep 27, 5:57 am, Yuval Levy wrote: > today seems to be my lucky day: [snip] > y...@yuv-desktop:~/src/libpano/bdir$ make package > [  0%] Built target man > [  1%] Building C object CMakeFiles/pano13.dir/adjust.c.o > /home/yuv/src/libpano/libpano13/adjust.c:44:22: error: PTcommon.h

[hugin-ptx] Re: HELP...! Weird nadir color from Hugin 0.8.0

On Fri 25-Sep-2009 at 10:47 -0700, mh wrote: > >Since I started using Hugin Version 0.8.0.4008Allard, I am getting >very weird nadirs out of Hugin. >I use only the images for the shots around to stitch a panorama. >When I am satisfied, I add the nadir shot, add control points and >optimize for the

[hugin-ptx] Re: tilt functions

> > The bottom line is that although I could eventually find a solution > which seems good, I felt that the sensitivity to small changes in the > optimizer's ability to find a good solution makes it difficult to > solve the system and also makes it hard to know when the solution is > good.   It ma

[hugin-ptx] Re: Canon 7D or SONY Alpha 850 - which one would you buy?

> Pentax has IMO the so far best implementation, but is also limited > (reduced x range). My ("outdated") K10D makes 5 steps of 2EV maximum. Joachim --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "hugin and other

[hugin-ptx] Re: Canon 7D or SONY Alpha 850 - which one would you buy?

> Definitely disappointing that camera manufacturers still have not > caught on to increased dynamic range work yet.  Even external camera > control software, which should have a lot more flexibility, doesn't > address the need (at least for Nikon). > > Another aspect of bracketing that would be a

[hugin-ptx] Re: Canon 7D or SONY Alpha 850 - which one would you buy?

Hi Yuv, Definitely disappointing that camera manufacturers still have not caught on to increased dynamic range work yet. Even external camera control software, which should have a lot more flexibility, doesn't address the need (at least for Nikon). Another aspect of bracketing that would be a f

[hugin-ptx] Re: tilt functions

>From a purely empirical point of view, it appears that there is some undesirable linkage between these parameters that makes the minimization process get trapped into local minima and have difficulty finding a solution in some cases. My basis for saying that is that I've been running some test c

[hugin-ptx] Re: horizontal / vertical orientation - limitation

On Sat 26-Sep-2009 at 16:51 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: > >will the new layout mode be more flexible about the orientation of the >same lens? I think it has a bugfix where hugin would successfully load such a project, but landscape and portrait images would still be different 'lenses'. The soluti

[hugin-ptx] horizontal / vertical orientation - limitation

Hi all I've run a bunch of randomly taken photos through panomatic. It identifies control points properly. however some of them are in landscape orientation and others in portrait. when I try to load them in Hugin, the following happens: MainFrame::RestoreLayoutOnNextResize() ERROR: 16:45:47.

[hugin-ptx] Re: [Press] LWN The Grumpy Editor's hugin experience

Andreas Metzler wrote: > Hello, > > FYI lwn.net has posted a hugin review as part of the grumpy editor's > series on . It is subscriber content > only currently but will be freely accessible after a week. > > The editor wasn't very grumpy though, the article ends

[hugin-ptx] Re: 2009.2.0 release notes proof-reading/trnaslation

Bruno Postle wrote: > On Fri 25-Sep-2009 at 21:12 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: >> If we were a commercial endeavour with marketing pazzazz, I would >> withhold the code release until the release notes are ready in 47 >> languages > > If we did marketing, then we would have a full press release with

[hugin-ptx] Re: 2009.2.0 release notes proof-reading/trnaslation

sebastien delcoigne wrote: > Sounds like a good idea, eventhough it prevents passers-by like me from > contributing a translation. the backup is to tell what you have to say here. some of the longer terms contributors may pick it up and it will land in the wiki. Yuv --~--~-~--~~---

[hugin-ptx] Re: Canon 7D or SONY Alpha 850 - which one would you buy?

Yuval> I would assume such a group to have, on average, a biased opinion and I Yuval> am not looking for fan answers. Actually the best feedback I got so far Yuval> is from Nikon users :) Hi Yuv, Most of use are biased... because we don't use both cameras most of the time. I personally l

[hugin-ptx] Re: Canon 7D or SONY Alpha 850 - which one would you buy?

Hi Rick, RueiKe wrote: > What type of bracketing capabilities do the A850D and the 7D have? the usual, plain, boring -2/0/+2 AEB. there are, of course, workarounds, but I am really fed up of camera manufacturers not understanding such a basic need and implementing such a simple function as fo

[hugin-ptx] Re: Canon 7D or SONY Alpha 850 - which one would you buy?

Tim Nugent wrote: > What do you need the high FPS for Yuv? fast moving subjects. action! > If you're on a cropped sensor I'd say the logical upgrade is to full frame not necessarily. for spherical panoramas FF has less angular resolution at equal megapixel count. that said, full frame is ver

[hugin-ptx] Re: 2009.2.0 release notes proof-reading/trnaslation

On Fri 25-Sep-2009 at 21:12 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: > >If we were a commercial endeavour with marketing pazzazz, I would >withhold the code release until the release notes are ready in 47 >languages If we did marketing, then we would have a full press release with everything a journalist needs

[hugin-ptx] issue with libpano13 CMake build (SVN1082)

today seems to be my lucky day: $ cmake ../libpano13 -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=/usr/local -DCPACK_BINARY_DEB:BOOL=ON -DCPACK_BINARY_NSIS:BOOL=OFF \ > -DCPACK_BINARY_RPM:BOOL=OFF -DCPACK_BINARY_STGZ:BOOL=OFF -DCPACK_BINARY_TBZ2:BOOL=OFF \ > -DCPACK_BINARY_TGZ:BOOL=OFF -DCPACK_BINARY_TZ:BOOL=OFF -

[hugin-ptx] buliding panomatic fails on Ubuntu 9.10 / AMD64

it builds on Ubuntu 9.04 and my 32bit dyno-book. but on my 64bit box it fails with the following error: In file included from ./tclap/UnlabeledValueArg.h:30, from tclap/CmdLine.h:28, from main.cpp:25: ./tclap/ValueArg.h: In member function ‘int TCLAP::VALUE_A

[hugin-ptx] Re: Canon 7D or SONY Alpha 850 - which one would you buy?

What do you need the high FPS for Yuv? If you're on a cropped sensor I'd say the logical upgrade is to full frame, particularly as you'll get a lot more width for shooting panos, so 5Dmark2 or D700 (although a D700x/s is rumoured). Too help fund it you could also sell your video camera and just us

[hugin-ptx] Re: Creation of doc's with cmake should work now

Am Samstag 26 September 2009 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > W.r.t. both the pdf's and html's: Christoph's versioning is not working > > (yet). It now displays " #define _CONFIG_COMPILER_H" on the front page. Corrected now. Thanks. Kornel -- Kornel Benko kornel.be...@berlin.de signature.asc

[hugin-ptx] Re: Creation of doc's with cmake should work now

2009/9/26 Kornel Benko > > > Strange. (But maybe -DNOSPLIT=ON forgotten. Default is NOSPLIT=OFF) > > Stupid, stupid, stupid. By now I use a script to wipe enblend, clone, create build dir, export some CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS, run cmake, run make. I forgot to add the -DNOSPLIT=ON It works correctly now.

[hugin-ptx] it works!

The spherical model of libpano places some constraints on the Tr model, but with few adaptions it works. This is 11 photos taken along a narrow alley. the "stair" effect will show you where those photos are: http://turingmachine.org/~dmg/temp/wall.jpg -- -- Daniel M. German

[hugin-ptx] Re: 2009.2.0 release notes proof-reading/trnaslation

Harry van der Wolf wrote: > Note that the OpenGL utility toolkit and the OpenGL library are > default available frameworks on OSX (GLUT and OpenGL)". > > I'm not sure whether leaving it out or adding it will create extra > confusion confusion IMO. Mentioning the dependencies (as is now) is prob

[hugin-ptx] Re: Creation of doc's with cmake should work now

2009/9/26 Kornel Benko > Am Samstag 26 September 2009 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > > W.r.t. both the pdf's and html's: Christoph's versioning is not working > > > (yet). It now displays " #define _CONFIG_COMPILER_H" on the front page. > > Corrected now. Thanks. > >Kornel > > -- > Kornel Benk

[hugin-ptx] Re: Canon 7D or SONY Alpha 850 - which one would you buy?

Don Holeman wrote: > Maybe you should also ask at > > http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Canon_EOS_dSLR/ I would assume such a group to have, on average, a biased opinion and I am not looking for fan answers. Actually the best feedback I got so far is from Nikon users :) My approach is appli

[hugin-ptx] Re: fonction0 in boost is not included from the correct place with debian

2009/9/26 Andreas Metzler > > "Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)" wrote: > > I've updated debian sid. > > In the update, all boost related stuff changed to version 1.40.0 > > > In libboost1.40-dev, function0.hpp is located in /usr/include/boost/ > > function/function0.hpp > > > ./src/hugin_base/vigra_ext/

[hugin-ptx] Re: Creation of doc's with cmake should work now

Am Samstag 26 September 2009 schrieb Harry van der Wolf: > 2009/9/26 Kornel Benko > > > Am Samstag 26 September 2009 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > > > This command could then include ${SPLIT_OPTION} with either > > > > "--no-split" > > > > > > or "" > > > > > > > > Harry > > > > > > OK Harry, but shou

[hugin-ptx] Re: it works!

Has anyone tried this with length of buildings down a block? I'd like to photograph and stitch our downtown area into one long photo for a project I'm looking at. I can provide photos. If there is a certain technique I need, please advise. I've tried twice, only with mixed success. > From:

[hugin-ptx] Re: (Probably very basic) help needed for build process on WinXP: missing files?

Yuval Levy schrieb: > Hallo Joachim, > > J. Schneider wrote: >> it would be a nice idea to try building hugin myself. > > good idea! I'll be happy to mentor you. would it be OK for you, in > exchange for the mentoring, to use your experience and improve the Wiki > instructions? I'd be glad to

[hugin-ptx] Re: Creation of doc's with cmake should work now

Am Samstag 26 September 2009 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > This command could then include ${SPLIT_OPTION} with either "--no-split" > > or "" > > > > Harry > > OK Harry, but should we do with the already created directory e.g. > enblend.html? > > I try to create enblend_file.html and install later as

[hugin-ptx] Re: Creation of doc's with cmake should work now

2009/9/26 Kornel Benko > Am Samstag 26 September 2009 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > > This command could then include ${SPLIT_OPTION} with either > "--no-split" > > > or "" > > > > > > Harry > > > > OK Harry, but should we do with the already created directory e.g. > > enblend.html? > > > > I try to

[hugin-ptx] Re: 2009.2.0 release notes proof-reading/trnaslation

2009/9/24 Bruno Postle > > The release notes for the imminent 2009.2.0 release are here: > > http://hugin.sourceforge.net/releases/2009.2.0/ > > I would appreciate some proof-reading, does it make sense? Now > would be a good time to do translations too. > > -- > Bruno > > Hi Bruno, Sorry for r

[hugin-ptx] Re: Creation of doc's with cmake should work now

Am Samstag 26 September 2009 schrieb Harry van der Wolf: > Stupid, stupid, stupid. Not stupid. This is, what every one knows from own (in my case very often made) experience. > By now I use a script to wipe enblend, clone, > create build dir, export some CFLAGS/CXXFLAGS, run cmake, run make. >

[hugin-ptx] Re: image date display error? Yes, but... (was: 2009.2.0 release notes proof-reading/trnaslation)

2009/9/25 Gerry Patterson > > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Harry van der Wolf wrote: > >> >> 2009/9/24 Bruno Postle >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu 24-Sep-2009 at 08:54 -0700, grow wrote: >>> > >>> >I have gone back and checked and my TIFF files do have both dates. If >>> >we are only going to have

[hugin-ptx] Re: 2009.2.0 release notes proof-reading/trnaslation

2009/9/26 J. Schneider > > > Yes, the list may need extending. What EXIF info do others think > > would be useful to display? > > > > GPS would be very useful if available. > Inside hugin I wouldn't need it, but I would like it to be transferred > to the final pano. > > Useful for me: > - ISO >

[hugin-ptx] Re: Creation of doc's with cmake should work now

Am Samstag 26 September 2009 schrieb Harry van der Wolf: ... > > One more item on my wishlist is to have the --no-split option back when > creating html documentation. It could be something like -DNOSPLIT=1 and it > will only be interpreted if -DDOC=1 has been set too. > > You have the command "COM

[hugin-ptx] Re: 2009.2.0 release notes proof-reading/trnaslation

2009/9/26 Yuval Levy > > Harry van der Wolf wrote: > > Note that the OpenGL utility toolkit and the OpenGL library are > > default available frameworks on OSX (GLUT and OpenGL)". > > > > I'm not sure whether leaving it out or adding it will create extra > > confusion > > confusion IMO. > > Mentio

[hugin-ptx] Re: 2009.2.0 release notes proof-reading/trnaslation

On Sat 26-Sep-2009 at 00:49 +0200, J. Schneider wrote: > >> GPS would be very useful if available. >Inside hugin I wouldn't need it, but I would like it to be transferred >to the final pano. This should already happen, is it broken? >Useful for me: >- ISO >- focal length multiplier (though avai

[hugin-ptx] Re: Creation of doc's with cmake should work now

Am Samstag 26 September 2009 schrieb Harry van der Wolf: > 2009/9/26 Kornel Benko > > > Meanwhile the html-creation should include the images. > > > >Kornel > > -- > > Kornel Benko > > kornel.be...@berlin.de > > Only 3 out of 9 images are copied. > focus-stack-decision-tree.png > local-ana

[hugin-ptx] Re: Commiting problems

Am Samstag 26 September 2009 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Hi Christoph, > I have problems to commit my changes. Ok, I cloned again. Inserted my chages into the new tree and commited. This time it was ok. Kornel -- Kornel Benko kornel.be...@berlin.de signature.asc Description: This is a dig

[hugin-ptx] Commiting problems

Hi Christoph, I have problems to commit my changes. This is the sequence I am facing: hg commit -->ok hg push --> searching for changes abort: push creates new remote heads! (did you forget to merge? use push -f to force) hg pull pulling from http

[hugin-ptx] Re: Creation of doc's with cmake should work now

2009/9/26 Kornel Benko > > > Meanwhile the html-creation should include the images. > >Kornel > -- > Kornel Benko > kornel.be...@berlin.de > Only 3 out of 9 images are copied. focus-stack-decision-tree.png local-analysis-window.png photographic-workflow.png W.r.t. both the pdf's and ht

[hugin-ptx] Re: Creation of doc's with cmake should work now

Am Samstag 26 September 2009 schrieb Harry van der Wolf: > 2009/9/26 Kornel Benko > > > > > > > THUMBPDF 3.8, 2005/07/06 - Copyright (c) 1999-2005 by Heiko Oberdiek. > > > *** make png files / run Ghostscript *** > > > *** clear temp files *** > > > !!! Error: Cannot open > > > > I get here: > >

[hugin-ptx] Re: fonction0 in boost is not included from the correct place with debian

"Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)" wrote: > I've updated debian sid. > In the update, all boost related stuff changed to version 1.40.0 > In libboost1.40-dev, function0.hpp is located in /usr/include/boost/ > function/function0.hpp > ./src/hugin_base/vigra_ext/ImageTransforms.h has to be adjusted to >

[hugin-ptx] Re: Creation of doc's with cmake should work now

2009/9/26 Kornel Benko > > > > > THUMBPDF 3.8, 2005/07/06 - Copyright (c) 1999-2005 by Heiko Oberdiek. > > *** make png files / run Ghostscript *** > > *** clear temp files *** > > !!! Error: Cannot open > > I get here: > *** make png files / run Ghostscript *** > [1{/usr/local/texlive/2008/tex

[hugin-ptx] Re: Creation of doc's with cmake should work now

Am Samstag 26 September 2009 schrieb Harry van der Wolf: > I just tried, but where do I find this enblend_file.html or > enfuse_file.html or the final versions? > When running make I can't find them and with running make package I can't > find them either. This is my output Inside the Build-direct