Yuval Levy píše v Ne 27. 09. 2009 v 13:07 -0400:
What I notice looking at the beautiful movie you linked is that most of
the shots are either not spontaneous; or if they are the camera is held
like a DSLR and not like a camcorder. Many of the shots look as if the
photographer (not
Milan Knížek wrote:
The biggest problems are:
excellent analysis. it seems that the Magic Lantern firmware for 5DMkII
(and soon 7D) is trying to correct some of the software mistakes. For
the hardware ones we can only hope that the manufacturers move faster
along the learning curve.
Yuv
Hi Yuv,
My views on the subject:
-All the modern DSLRs are very good compared to what was around only a
few years ago, let alone a decade ago. If you spend a bit of time
thinking about your choice (as it seems you are), it's hard to make a
bad one.
-A good body is not much use if you don't have
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 10:51 PM, RizThon rizt...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't understand why using a FF you'll have a better shallow depth of
field effet? I have a 50mm 1.4 (but a 1.8 would already be enough) and it
gives me great portrait...honestly, I just *love* that lens, and I can
always
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 9:20 PM, RueiKe ruei...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I just tried Live View on the D3. No impact on the mirror lock up.
Too bad. At high speed, it can induce significant camera shake.
Rick
I can confirm that the 1ds3 brackets up to 7 shots, from 1/3 to up to
3
I tried again on the D3 just to be sure. I verified that in live view
mode, I can see the mirror moving for each photo when in CH and
bracket mode. I will raise this question in the D3 flickr group to
see if there is another approach.
On Sep 27, 3:31 pm, dmg d...@uvic.ca wrote:
On Sat, Sep
RizThon wrote:
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 04:21, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
Tim Nugent wrote:
What do you need the high FPS for Yuv?
fast moving subjects. action!
So that wouldn't really be for taking panoramas I guess ^^
well, not only panoramas. one thing I found interesting in the
Hi Rick,
RueiKe wrote:
Even external camera
control software, which should have a lot more flexibility, doesn't
address the need (at least for Nikon).
what external camera control software do you use, and what are you missing?
Another aspect of bracketing that would be a factor for me
sell your video camera and just use the SLR for movies too.
not yet. the current crop of SLRs are no good for movie making. They
need a tiltable LCD display first.
Check this out, I'd say SLRs are now good enough for making movies:
http://www.vimeo.com/6501875
And of course you can use
Tim Nugent wrote:
Check this out, I'd say SLRs are now good enough for making movies:
http://www.vimeo.com/6501875
And of course you can use all your favourite lenses and do amazing things
with depth of field. You can get video lenses that do all that but it would
cost you an absolute
Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
Tim Nugent wrote:
[...]
sell your video camera and just use the SLR for movies too.
not yet. the current crop of SLRs are no good for movie making. They
need a tiltable LCD display first.
... which currently seems to reduce the selection to the Lumix GH1.
Hello Rick
On 27.09.2009, at 00:37, RueiKe wrote:
Definitely disappointing that camera manufacturers still have not
caught on to increased dynamic range work yet. Even external camera
control software, which should have a lot more flexibility, doesn't
address the need (at least for Nikon).
Don Holeman wrote:
Maybe you should also ask at
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Canon_EOS_dSLR/
I would assume such a group to have, on average, a biased opinion and I
am not looking for fan answers. Actually the best feedback I got so far
is from Nikon users :)
My approach is
What do you need the high FPS for Yuv?
If you're on a cropped sensor I'd say the logical upgrade is to full frame,
particularly as you'll get a lot more width for shooting panos, so 5Dmark2
or D700 (although a D700x/s is rumoured). Too help fund it you could also
sell your video camera and just
Tim Nugent wrote:
What do you need the high FPS for Yuv?
fast moving subjects. action!
If you're on a cropped sensor I'd say the logical upgrade is to full frame
not necessarily. for spherical panoramas FF has less angular resolution
at equal megapixel count.
that said, full frame is very
Hi Rick,
RueiKe wrote:
What type of bracketing capabilities do the A850D and the 7D have?
the usual, plain, boring -2/0/+2 AEB. there are, of course, workarounds,
but I am really fed up of camera manufacturers not understanding such a
basic need and implementing such a simple function as
Yuval I would assume such a group to have, on average, a biased opinion and I
Yuval am not looking for fan answers. Actually the best feedback I got so far
Yuval is from Nikon users :)
Hi Yuv,
Most of use are biased... because we don't use both cameras most of the
time.
I personally
Hi Yuv,
Definitely disappointing that camera manufacturers still have not
caught on to increased dynamic range work yet. Even external camera
control software, which should have a lot more flexibility, doesn't
address the need (at least for Nikon).
Another aspect of bracketing that would be a
Definitely disappointing that camera manufacturers still have not
caught on to increased dynamic range work yet. Even external camera
control software, which should have a lot more flexibility, doesn't
address the need (at least for Nikon).
Another aspect of bracketing that would be a
Pentax has IMO the so far best implementation, but is also limited
(reduced x range).
My (outdated) K10D makes 5 steps of 2EV maximum.
Joachim
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
hugin and other free
Hi Daniel,
I just tried Live View on the D3. No impact on the mirror lock up.
Too bad. At high speed, it can induce significant camera shake.
Rick
On Sep 27, 6:46 am, dmg d...@uvic.ca wrote:
Definitely disappointing that camera manufacturers still have not
caught on to increased dynamic
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 04:21, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
Tim Nugent wrote:
What do you need the high FPS for Yuv?
fast moving subjects. action!
So that wouldn't really be for taking panoramas I guess ^^ Also be carefull,
sometimes it's written something like 7 images per seconds *
As for Canon VS Nikon lenses, unless you prefer a body from one or the other
brand, I feel like Nikon bodies and lenses are more expensive...I still own
a Nikon though and probably won't change because of the few lenses I already
have.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
Maybe you should also ask at
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/Canon_EOS_dSLR/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions
What type of bracketing capabilities do the A850D and the 7D have? I
heard that the Canons have only a max of 3 steps, but maybe this is
only consumer level. The Nikons support 3, 5, 7, and 9 steps at a max
increment of 1EV, while I heard that Pentax supports 2EV increments,
but only 3 steps.
25 matches
Mail list logo
