Hi!
I wanted to check in with you on draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options. I'm the
responsible AD for C405 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/cluster_info.php?cid=C405),
a large tranche of I2NSF WG documents, and would really like to see those
documents published. However, they are sitting in MISREF
: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 4:30 AM
To: Roman Danyliw ; Patrick Lingga ;
Yoav Nir
Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org; Susan Hares ; DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA
; JungSoo Park ; Yunchul Choi
; Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
Subject: [I2nsf] Next Steps of I2NSF
Hi Roman, Linda, and Yoav,
To complement our I2NSF as a closed-loop s
Hi Paul and Patrick!
I’d also like to thank you for your leadership in completing the core YANG data
models. Your efforts are why we are done.
Roman
From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2023 7:37 PM
To: Roman Danyliw
Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org; The IESG ; Linda Dunbar
; Yoav Nir
Hi WG!
Congratulations on your efforts to document the I2NSF architecture and specify
the supporting models to implement it. This took a sustained engagement and
significant community engagement. Thank you for a job well done!
With the last of planned work items just approved and consistent
; Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
; Roman Danyliw ; The IESG
; Yoav Nir ; i2nsf@ietf.org;
skku-iotlab-members
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Lars Eggert's Discuss on
draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm-27: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Hi Lars,
I have addressed your further comments on the revision.
Could
Hi Paul and Patrick!
I appreciate the changes in -23. I’ve advanced the document to IETF LC.
Roman
From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2023 8:55 AM
To: Roman Danyliw
Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org; Patrick Lingga ;
skku-iotlab-members ; Mr. Jaehoon Paul
Jeong
Subject: Re: [I2nsf
Hi!
I wanted to follow-up on my summary of the WG next step from November [4].
I'm excited to see that we are closing in on publishing the final two WG
deliverables [1] [2]. My hope is to have [1] and [2] in IETF Last Call before
the Yokohama meeting. Their publication will release an entire
Hi
I performed an AD review on draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm-23
(https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/VHbdIrvHo5EjvcyQf5v9fjeVy1w/).
The authors produced at -24 in response (thank you!) and I provided additional
feedback
Hi
I performed an AD review on draft-ietf-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm-21
(https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/82QQzd1J6A8xqlyv5ZBRn4_xZCs/).
The authors produced at -22 in response. Thank you!
To make it easier to track the remaining issues, I've created this new thread.
The
Hi!
I performed an AD review on draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm-23
(https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/VHbdIrvHo5EjvcyQf5v9fjeVy1w/).
The authors produced at -24 in response. Thank you!
To make it easier to track the remaining issues, I've created this new thread.
The
Hi Paul,
With the US Thanksgiving holiday last week and a full telechat this week I have
not yet had time to look at either this or the registration document.
Regards,
Roman
From: I2nsf On Behalf Of Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2022 9:35 AM
To: Roman Danyliw
Cc: i2nsf
sion to be held on
> Tuesday morning 9:30am-11:30? IETF 115 session swap for I2NSF
>
> I2NSFers,
>
> Our AD asks if we want to swap the I2NSF session in IETF115 to Tuesday
> 9:30am-11:30m.
>
> Are you all available?
>
> Please let us know ASAP.
>
> Linda
&g
Hi I2NSF WG!
I see that rechartering is again on the agenda for the upcoming 115 IETF
meeting. I'd like to repeat what I said at IETF 114 and in March 2022 [1],
October 2021 [2], and November 2020 [3] on this topic. To re-charter, there
would need to be a compelling demonstration of
Hi!
I performed an AD review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-registration-interface-dm-21.
More feedback is split into a two section: general comments on the document
followed by specific section by section comments.
==[ General Comments
I appreciate that this document is intended to specify the
Hi!
I performed my AD review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-consumer-facing-interface-dm-23.
Thanks for the work on this information/data model. Below is my feedback:
** Section 1. Could a sentence or two here to explain what the Security
Controller, the recipient of the Consumer-Facing Interface,
Approved.
Roman
> -Original Message-
> From: Amanda Baber via RT
> Sent: Monday, May 23, 2022 1:19 PM
> Cc: ynir.i...@gmail.com; tim...@skku.edu; sha...@ndzh.com; rgm@htt-
> consult.com; Roman Danyliw ; paulje...@skku.edu;
> paul.wout...@aiven.io; patricklink...
Hi I2NSF WG!
> -Original Message-
> From: iesg On Behalf Of Zaheduzzaman Sarker via
> Datatracker
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 11:06 AM
> To: The IESG
> Cc: draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-mo...@ietf.org; i2nsf@ietf.org;
> dunbar...@gmail.com; i2nsf-cha...@ietf.org
>
Hi Murray!
> -Original Message-
> From: I2nsf On Behalf Of Murray Kucherawy via
> Datatracker
> Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2022 1:50 AM
> To: The IESG
> Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org; draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-mo...@ietf.org; Linda
> Dunbar ; i2nsf-cha...@ietf.org
> Subject: [I2nsf]
Hi Paul!
Thanks for this last update on this document too. I’ve advanced it for
publication.
Congratulations and thanks for the hard work.
Roman
From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2022 5:38 AM
To: Roman Danyliw
Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org; skku-iotlab-members ;
Mr. Jaehoon Paul
Hi Paul!
Thanks for this last update. I’ve advanced the document for publication.
Congratulations to you and the document team, and the WG for this work. Well
done!
Roman
From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
Sent: Saturday, May 14, 2022 5:38 AM
To: Roman Danyliw
Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org; skku-iotlab
Hi!
Thank you for all of the edits on draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm
which largely resolved IESG feedback.
I'm going to ask for few more editorial fixes:
(1) (from idnits)
-- The abstract seems to contain references
([I-D.ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model]), which it
Hi!
Thank you for all of the edits on draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model which
resolved IESG feedback.
I'm going to ask for one more edit which will reverting a change made based on
IESG review. In the -24 /-25 which was reviewed by the IESG, RFC8805 was
correctly listed as a normative
(i.e., what's in the COMMENTs). With the surge of documents pushed in
advance of the IETF 113 AD turn-over and the WG reassignments I am a bit behind
on certain document reviews.
Thanks for everyone's patience.
Roman
From: Linda Dunbar
Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2022 10:34 AM
To: Roman Danyliw
Hi Sue!
> -Original Message-
> From: Susan Hares
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2022 9:27 AM
> To: Roman Danyliw ; i2nsf@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [I2nsf] Comments on re-chartering
>
> Roman:
>
> The orchestration in the original charter was seen as "Yang mo
I2NSF does not expand the
published WG scope. If there is a desire to do more Yang modeling work for
IPSec that would take a re-charter or another WG.
Regards,
Roman
> -Original Message-
> From: Susan Hares
> Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2022 8:46 AM
> To: Roman Danyliw ; i2nsf@
Hi Sue!
> -Original Message-
> From: Susan Hares
> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2022 6:35 PM
> To: Roman Danyliw ; i2nsf@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [I2nsf] Comments on re-chartering
>
> Roman:
>
> Security has created very few Yang modules.Therefore, y
been equally fair for a MIB, JSON, text file-based
data model facing the same timing challenge.
Roman
From: Susan Hares
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2022 6:02 AM
To: Roman Danyliw
Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org
Subject: FW: Zahed's DISCUSS on draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model
Roman:
This is an example
Hi Sue!
> -Original Message-
> From: I2nsf On Behalf Of Susan Hares
> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2022 8:46 AM
> To: 't petch' ; Roman Danyliw ; 'Linda
> Dunbar' ; i2nsf@ietf.org
> Cc: 'Patrick Lingga' ; 'Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong'
>
> Subject: Re: [I2nsf] WGLC for d
Hi Sue!
> -Original Message-
> From: I2nsf On Behalf Of Susan Hares
> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2022 3:12 PM
> To: Roman Danyliw ; i2nsf@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Comments on re-chartering
>
> Roman:
>
> May I ask a questions before answering yo
Hi!
It's nice to see I2NSF on the formal meeting agenda again. I see discussions
on the mailing list to again revisit the WG charter [3] and it's on the agenda
for this week's IETF 113 meeting. I don't want my position at the meeting to
come as a surprise so I'll restate what I've previously
Hi!
Linda: Thanks sending out this assessment and ending the WGLC.
WG: In additional to the IPR check, one other thing I will be looking for in
the second WGLC of this document is (a) evidence of review by the WG and (b)
support by the WG to publish it (irrespective of whether there is charter
Hi!
From: Dan Romascanu
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2022 10:44 AM
To: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
Cc: General Area Review Team ; i2nsf@ietf.org; Last Call
; draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Genart last call review of
Hi Linda!
Thanks for the revision to the shepherd report. Additional comments inline ...
From: Linda Dunbar
Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2021 11:07 AM
To: Roman Danyliw ; i2nsf@ietf.org
Subject: Updated Shepherd Writeup for draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-21
Roman,
The Shepherd Writeup
Hi Paul!
(adding I2NSF and document alias like an official response to a directorate
review)
Thanks for this review. A response below and the authors/WG can correct me.
> -Original Message-
> From: secdir On Behalf Of Paul Wouters
> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2021 4:06 PM
> To: secdir
Hi!
From: Linda Dunbar
Sent: Thursday, December 2, 2021 11:16 AM
To: Roman Danyliw ; i2nsf@ietf.org
Subject: Updated Shepherd Writeup for
draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm-16
Roman,
The Shepherd Writeup has been updated to reflect the changes and progress made
through IETF LC.
https
Hi Paul!
Thanks to you and Patrick for these edits published in -12. They address my
remaining AD review feedback. I’ve requested an IETF Last Call for this
document.
Regards,
Roman
From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2021 8:52 AM
To: Roman Danyliw
Cc: i2nsf
Hi!
From: I2nsf On Behalf Of Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2021 8:57 AM
To: Linda Dunbar ; Yoav Nir
Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org; skku-iotlab-members ;
Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Request for Help for I2NSF WG Work
Hi Linda and Yoav,
As you can see, the revisions
Paul Jeong
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2021 4:20 AM
To: Roman Danyliw
Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org; skku-iotlab-members ;
Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] AD Review follow-up on
draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-20
Hi Roman,
Here is the revision of the I2NSF Capability Data Model Draft
13, 2021 11:13 AM
To: Roman Danyliw
Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org; skku-iotlab-members ;
Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] AD Review follow-up on
draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm-15
Hi Roman,
Here is the revision of the I2NSF NSF-Facing Interface Data Model Draft:
https
Hi!
Thanks for all of the work and significant edits on draft versions -09 to -11.
To make thing easier to track, I'm starting a new thread on this -11 version of
the document to comment on any outstanding issues from my original AD review
Hi!
Thanks for all of the work on draft versions -13 to -15. To make thing easier
to track, I'm starting a new thread on this -15 version of the document to
comment on my AD review of -12
(https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/_cKk5mUXKGgmNeVWPxfAIn79X70/).
Unless otherwise noted
Hi!
Thanks for all of the work on draft versions -17 to -20. To make thing easier
to track, I'm starting a new thread on the -20 version of the document to
comment on my AD review of -16
(https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/BJ4GUttBVZRvHGm3m2_bEycNQWI/) and
the changes made to
Hi Paul and WG!
Thanks for your patience.
From: I2nsf On Behalf Of Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2021 10:54 AM
To: Linda Dunbar ; Yoav Nir
Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org; skku-iotlab-members ;
Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
Subject: [I2nsf] Request for Help for I2NSF WG Work
Hi Linda and
Hi!
I conducted a second AD review on -16 of
draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model. Thanks for the work to merge the text
from the previous stand-alone information model document and the preliminary
IESG feedback that came before the document was removed from the telechat. My
feedback is
Hi!
I conducted an AD review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-monitoring-data-model-08.
Thanks for this detailed info and data model.
My high-level comments are as follows:
** There is a lot of flexibility in this data model in the cardinality of the
fields and the sheer number of free form fields.
Hi!
> -Original Message-
> From: Alanna Paloma
> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2021 12:16 PM
> To: Rafa Marín López ; Gabriel Lopez ; Fernando
> Pereniguez-Garcia ; Roman Danyliw
> ; Benjamin Kaduk
> Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org; Yoav Nir ; rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org
> Subj
n the text
From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 11:45 AM
To: Roman Danyliw
Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org; Dr. Jinyong (Tim) Kim ; Patrick
Lingga ; skku-iotlab-members
; Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] AD Review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm-10
Hi Rom
been changed to
2020-10-08 from 2020-09-24
2020-09-2812 Roman Danyliw IESG state changed to
I-D Exists from IESG Evaluation – Defer
(this moved the document back to the WG)
2020-09-2812 Roman Danyliw
Based on preliminary feedback from the IESG
and willingness to implement from beyond the current set of
authors on the inflight documents.
Regards,
Roman
From: I2nsf On Behalf Of Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2020 10:46 PM
To: Linda Dunbar
Cc: Roman Danyliw ; DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA
; i2nsf@ietf.org; Yoav Nir ;
JungSoo Park ; Mr
Hi!
I performed an AD review on draft-ietf-i2nsf-nsf-facing-interface-dm-10.
Thanks for writing it.
My feedback is as follows:
** (This is the most significant issue) This document makes a significant
number of normative references to the capability information model. However,
the WG has
Hi Tero!
> -Original Message-
> From: IPsec On Behalf Of Tero Kivinen
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2020 6:42 PM
> To: Roman Danyliw
> Cc: Fernando Pereniguez-Garcia ;
> i2nsf@ietf.org; Gabriel Lopez ; ynir.i...@gmail.com;
> ip...@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org; Rafa Ma
Hi Tom!
> -Original Message-
> From: tom petch
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2020 7:14 AM
> To: Roman Danyliw ; Rafa Marin-Lopez
> Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org; Fernando Pereniguez-Garcia
> ; Gabriel Lopez ;
> ynir.i...@gmail.com; last-c...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re:
Hi Tom!
> -Original Message-
> From: last-call On Behalf Of tom petch
> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2020 12:38 PM
> To: Rafa Marin-Lopez
> Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org; Fernando Pereniguez-Garcia
> ; Gabriel Lopez ;
> ynir.i...@gmail.com; last-c...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Last-Call] New Version
, September 28, 2020 1:42 PM
To: Roman Danyliw
Cc: draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-mo...@ietf.org; dunbar...@gmail.com;
i2nsf@ietf.org; Magnus Westerlund
; i...@ietf.org;
i2nsf-cha...@ietf.org; sha...@ndzh.com
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] Magnus Westerlund's Discuss on
draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data
Hi Magnus!
> -Original Message-
> From: I2nsf On Behalf Of Magnus Westerlund
> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2020 10:35 AM
> To: i...@ietf.org; sha...@ndzh.com
> Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org; draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-mo...@ietf.org;
> dunbar...@gmail.com; i2nsf-cha...@ietf.org
> Subject: Re:
Hi Paul!
Thanks for all of these revisions. I’ve changed the document state to start
IETF LC.
Regards,
Roman
From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2020 1:08 PM
To: Roman Danyliw
Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org; skku-iotlab-members ;
Susan Hares ; Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
Subject: Re
capability";
}
Regards,
Roman
From: I2nsf On Behalf Of Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
Sent: Tuesday, August 25, 2020 8:18 AM
To: Roman Danyliw
Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org; skku-iotlab-members ;
Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong ; Susan Hares
Subject: Re: [I2nsf] AD Review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-mo
-data-model); in the meantime this
[draft-ietf-i2nsf-capapbility-data-model] document gets published”
Regards,
Roman
From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
Sent: Monday, August 24, 2020 10:49 AM
To: Roman Danyliw
Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org; Susan Hares ; skku-iotlab-members
; Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
Subject: Re
r an unadopted (individual),
expired draft; and this approach doesn’t preclude future enhancements (as
proposed by draft-dong-i2nsf-asf-config). What does everyone else think?
Regards,
Roman
From: Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 9:04 AM
To: Roman Danyliw
Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org;
they have to be normative. Does that
make sense?
Regards,
Roman
[1]
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/normative-informative-references/
> -Original Message-
> From: I2nsf On Behalf Of RFC Editor
> Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2020 6:40 PM
> To: Roman Dany
Hi!
I conducted an AD review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-data-model-05. Thanks
for the work in getting this document written. My most significant items are
around aligning of the text in Section 4 with RFC8329 and the dependency on
draft-dong-i2nsf-asf-config-01. My detailed feedback is
Hi!
I performed an AD review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-sdn-ipsec-flow-protection-07 and
my feedback is as follows:
(1) As written, it wasn't clear to me how this document fits into the I2NSF
architecture. There were a number of places in the document that the
underlying reference architecture does
Hi!
The following is my AD review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-capability-05:
== [ Process feedback
(1) The I2NSF charter states "The working group will decide later whether the
information model needs to be published as an RFC". The shepherd write-up does
not capture WG deliberation on choosing to
Hello!
During today's F2F meeting, we discussed the need to check the charter scope of
the work proposed in draft-yang-i2nsf-security-policy-translation. Making no
value judgement on the utility of the work, in my review of the current
charter, this class of work is not in scope. The current
odules and testing of NSF code)
is out of scope for I2NSF.
Please let this draft go under the IESG submission.
Thanks for your help.
Best Regards,
Paul
On Sat, Jun 22, 2019 at 5:46 AM Roman Danyliw
mailto:r...@cert..org>> wrote:
Hello Paul!
Thanks for the revised text and answering all of
Hi!
> From: Yoav Nir [mailto:ynir.i...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2019 1:27 PM
> To: i2nsf@ietf.org
> Cc: Roman Danyliw
> Subject: IPR Statements about I2NSF documents
>
> Hi
>
> Yesterday we got 5 IPR statements ([1], [2], [3], [4], [5]) relate
rom: I2nsf [mailto:i2nsf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Mr. Jaehoon Paul
> Jeong
> Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2019 5:13 AM
> To: Roman Danyliw ; Linda Dunbar
> ; Yoav Nir
> Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org; skku_secu-brain_...@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [I2nsf] AD Review: draft-ietf-i2nsf-app
Hi Linda and Paul!
I’ve seen the updates to my comments. My apologizes for the delay in reviewing
and commenting on them. Please expect feedback early next week.
Roman
From: Linda Dunbar [mailto:dunbar...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2019 6:45 PM
To: Roman Danyliw
Cc: i2nsf@ietf.org
Hi!
I'm picking up where ekr left off
(https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/i2nsf/bVTGfSXR70UcFkwfkV4FsNHg8uo) with
an AD review of draft-ietf-i2nsf-applicability-09.
(1) Section 1. Please do not expand NSF again the second sentence. The
acronym NSF was defined in the first sentence.
(2)
69 matches
Mail list logo
