And we tend to be irritated or perplexed when we do. And usually just
whack them with the appropriate stick :)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 4:00 PM
To:
Greetings,
A updated level of DAF is available at:
http://www.geocities.com/michaeljosephcleary/
Major enhancements include:
Add keyword PGM
Add SMF Record AO support
Add SMF Record DFPACS support
Add SMF Record Type 19 support
Cheers...
Michael
Also, I find it a bit
strange to see Cut the guy some slack and RTFM in the same
message. It might help if you suggested which FM you want him to read.
True. But there are just so many...
Obviously, he has been thrown into a new
job without any kind of training on that job.
Then he is unlikely
Hello,
we have a problem with interaction between RMM and DB2 and i wonder if
anybody has seen the same phenomenon before:
Our DB2 Master Adress Space writes his own Archlogs to Tape
(PGM=DSNYASCP).
If these were multi-volume datasets, they are not correctly updated in
RMM Catalog.
On the
We are using CA1 and TSM, and we are interested in how RMM behaves:
I copy a tape (that is not full) via IEBGENER. After the copy operation both
input and output tape show the same block count.
I copy a tape in TSM status 'full' via TSM command 'backup stgpool'. After
the copy operation both
Of course, I won't ask why you were applying maintenance to a running
system. :-)
Dave Jousma
Principal Systems Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
616.653.8429
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL
Barbara,
Another option would be to contact CA-1 support and we would be happy to
supply a SLIP during CLOSE processing to capture the IBM control blocks.
Then you could show IBM that TSM is not updating the control blocks
correctly.
Russell Witt
CA-1 Level-2 Support Manager
-Original
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/23/2006
at 10:56 AM, Darren Evans-Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The first post to IBM-MAIN was sent on Friday June 6, 1986.
BITNET or LISTSERV?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 02/23/2006
at 03:45 PM, Imbriale, Donald (Exchange) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
Do you care to elaborate, or just leave us guessing?
Setting the data portion to 255'FF' Could confuse the STOW code. The
first two bytes are supposed to be a length field.
--
Shmuel
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/21/2006
at 12:55 PM, Ed Finnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
http://www.cs.clemson.edu/~mark/stretch.html
Missing a few key points:
1. Unlike the S/360 et al, Stretch did not have 8-bit bytes; it had
bytes of the size specified by the programmer, and as I recall
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:13:29 -0800, Edward E. Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Zelden wrote:
You can't expect to have a separate LPAR for every small client
in all service-bureau environments. Too expensive, too much overhead.
That's why God invented VM.
That still would not have been
Christian, ... maybe I am biased, but this is a DB2 problem.
The data set sequence number in a catalog entry should match the value you
would have specified in JCL to create the data set. So, if I create data
set sequence number 3 on first volume, and the data set spans to a next
volume both
Be gentle I use IOF all the time, but on my freshly installed z/OS
1.7 system, all I have is SDSF.
In IOF, I can edit a job on the output queue to get the JCL that was
submitted and resubmit it even making minor changes. Is there an
equivalent function in SDSF?
Hal Merritt wrote:
Anyone have a suggestion as to a quick start guide? The native IBM
manuals are, well, just a little confusing.
See: SG244632 ETL Practical Guide.
You'll find step by step implementation plan.
If you have specific questions, just ask IBM-MAIN.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz,
NOTICE:
All information in and attached to the e-mail(s) below may be proprietary,
confidential, privileged and otherwise protected from improper or erroneous
disclosure. If you are not the sender's intended recipient, you are not
authorized to intercept, read, print, retain, copy, forward, or
Type SJ in the line command on the left of the job.
Lynne Karson
Senior Software Specialist
U.S. Senate Sergeant at Arms
(202)224-9587
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rugen, Len
Sent: Friday, February 24,
Type *SE* next to the output. SJ for JCL.. Press PF1 for more options.
Bob Richards
VP, Enterprise Technologist
Enterprise Technology Infrastructure
SunTrust Banks, Inc.
(404) 575-2798
Seeing beyond money (sm)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL
Try SE as the line command.
On Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:07:40 -0600, Rugen, Len wrote:
Be gentle I use IOF all the time, but on my freshly installed z/OS
1.7 system, all I have is SDSF.
In IOF, I can edit a job on the output queue to get the JCL that was
submitted and resubmit it even
There is an inaccuracy (marketting?) in the poster.
DB2 is/was not the first Relational Database.
Model 204 was.
-
-teD
I’m an enthusiastic proselytiser of the universal panacea I believe in!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
I apologize, my earlier append was not clear. DFSORT does check and if CFW
is not active in the controller, then the CFW bit is not turned on. Also, I
would agree that there is a performance benefit of using CFW since you
eliminate the need to write to the NVS. But I have seen many customers
Use SJ to EDIT the JCL from the hold queu in SDSF..
Rugen, Len wrote:
Be gentle I use IOF all the time, but on my freshly installed z/OS
1.7 system, all I have is SDSF.
In IOF, I can edit a job on the output queue to get the JCL that was
submitted and resubmit it even making minor
Eric Thomas had just written Listserv. Universities were on
BITNET. Our node name was UA1VM at the time. We were running
on an IBM-3081 with 64MB of memory (VM/SP) if I remember
correctly.
Darren
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02/23/2006
at
You can put SJ beside the job and edit the JCL.
C. Todd Burrell
Senior z/OS Systems Programmer
ITSO
(404) 498-3299
(404) 723-2017 (cell)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rugen, Len
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 10:08 AM
In a message dated 2/24/2006 9:08:03 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In IOF, I can edit a job on the output queue to get the JCL that was
submitted and resubmit it even making minor changes. Is there an
equivalent function in SDSF?
Your PFK1 broke? SJ as line
teD said:
There is an inaccuracy (marketting?) in the poster.
DB2 is/was not the first Relational Database.
Model 204 was.
Model 204 is relational-like, but I think it was developed before Codd
published his relational model.
Regards,
John Kalinich
Computer Sciences Corp
Actually AFAIK, System/R was the first relational database
implementation, done in IBM research in the late 1970s. SQL/DS was the
first productized version (it ran on VM) and DB2 showed up on MVS/XA a
little later - circa 1983.
Model 204 came out in 1973 (or 4).
The only reason I know this is
Model 204 is relational-like, but I think it was developed before Codd
published his relational model.
It was also changed to match the model.
And, SQL support was added circa 1990.
-
-teD
I’m an enthusiastic proselytiser of the universal panacea I believe in!
Here is my theory:
Use DISP=(NEW,PASS)
Also this looks very much like a program which may write data to a file,
close the file, and then read the data back in.
On a temporary dataset, it my be getting deleted after the close.
Are the temporary datasets being directed to disk or VIO?
On Thu,
Darren Evans-Young wrote:
Eric Thomas had just written Listserv. Universities were on
BITNET. Our node name was UA1VM at the time. We were running
on an IBM-3081 with 64MB of memory (VM/SP) if I remember
correctly.
Mainframes in Poland had then probably 256kB up to 1MB. Maybe more...
In those
Well, SDSF help is a little perverse
PF1 from the ST panel, then choose Action Characters, (not Line
Commands).
I got // thru CDA with PF7 -UP but NOT PF8- Down, so I didn't see
the REST of the action characters. CUA navigation WAS PF7/PF8, I missed
the Enter key for the next panel.
I think you're close to the cause. The temp data set does not get deleted
until step end, but if the appl closes the file and reopens it, then all
bets are off.
Matthew Stitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
02/24/2006 10:58 AM
Please respond to
And getting this error...
IEW2703S D40C GET DIRECTORY ENTRY FAILED FOR DDNAME NAME SYSLIB.
DIRECTORY
SERVICES ISSUED RETURN CODE 36 AND REASON CODE 270A0447.
Update: Have traced the problem to CA-PDSMAN which controls a few of those
libraries in the SYSLIB concat list. Working with them on it.
What does 1.4 to 1.6 have to do with performance management interfacing
with security?
I read in a previous post that the dsn hiding feature because available
with 1.5. Management and performance folks around here want to remain very
aware of all processes which might effect cpu usage. Mr.
Jeffrey,
I noticed in your library list that you are including SIGYCOMP. This
library contains the programs needed to run the COBOL compiler (IGYx).
AFAIK, none of it's modules should need to be included in any compiled
program. You might want to consider removing it from your //SYSLIB
On 2006-02-24 09:41, howard.braazee said:
Except that if someone enters 00:01AM, while it might not be technically
correct, it is unambiguous.
Are you saying that, in your programs, you check for and allow 00:01AM?
It would be nice to be correct. It is more important to be clear
Excellent. Thanks for the info.
Don Imbriale
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 4:22 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: IBM Supported method to empty PDS in Batch
What's new in release 3.04
Release date: 24 February 2006
CCKD garbage collection fix (Greg Smith)
Reworked timing functions (Jan Jaeger)
Codepage 1047 conversion tables (Kevin Leonard)
Fixed off-by-one-day bug with SYSEPOCH other than 1900;
added
Which number is the block count? RMM shows volume usage, but not block count?
Volume use count . : 5 Volume usage (Kb) . . . . : 308107264
Capacity (Mb) . . : 286102 Percent full . . . . . . . : 17
Create date . . . : 2005/318 Create time . . . . . . .
Has anyone heard of R_Admin/IRRSEQ00 invoking ACF2 or TSS at least for just
a TSO admin command via function code ADMN_RUN_COMD?
R_Admin/IRRSEQ00 is a SAF Callable Service. The SAF implies some standard
usage across different ESM's (external security managers) like RACF, ACF2 Top
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 14:55:58 -0600, Hal Merritt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
No. It means that the default behavior of MOD is changed. It means the
PDS pointed to by SYSUT2 will contain only members added via the
sequential input stream. If the input stream is empty, then the PDS will
be empty.
And
If it's going to VIO, then that could change the assigned BLKSIZE since
this can be different geometry, which might uncover some kind of bug in the
program.
Bill
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 20:43:28 -0800, Skip Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Wow, I love this kind of problem. I ran the following JCL
. . . and we're running DB2 and Model 204 today.
Jon
snip
DB2 is/was not the first Relational Database.
Model 204 was.
/snip
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
I just ran my program again on a z/OS 1.7 system and it worked fine against
a PDS, so apparently having the fix on is not enough if you are at z/OS 1.4.
On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 12:54:19 -0600, Alan C. Field
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just wrote a quick program to do the STOW with the initialize
How many of the early posters are still active on the list?
-Original Message-
Trivia time: Who is this month's top poster on IBM-Main and who is the
all time top-poster? Take a guess - then find out here:
http://groups.google.com/group/bit.listserv.ibm-main/about
Hi, I am having a problem defining a printer for our Integrated Console
Controller.
We have a Z890 running ZOS 1.4. I have an integrated console working on
out test LPAR. I need to replace a 3286-2 type printer. I am using the
OSA-Express Integrated Console Controller Implementation Guide
All of them on the all time list still post here. Rick F. is semi-retired,
but the rest post very regularly.
Bob Richards
VP, Enterprise Technologist
Enterprise Technology Infrastructure
SunTrust Banks, Inc.
(404) 575-2798
Seeing beyond money (sm)
-Original Message-
From: IBM
On 2/24/2006 12:46 PM, Jim Keohane wrote:
Has anyone heard of R_Admin/IRRSEQ00 invoking ACF2 or TSS at least for just
a TSO admin command via function code ADMN_RUN_COMD?
R_Admin/IRRSEQ00 is a SAF Callable Service. The SAF implies some standard usage
across different ESM's (external
Well, I googled my oldest email address and found a post from March 1992
talking about a product called aggravator or something
Just let it drop :-)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
Trivia time: Who is this month's top poster on IBM-Main and who is the
all time top-poster?
Looks like I need to get a life outside IBM-MAIN.
I'm still behind Seymour, who is 3 of the top 10 in 3 different personas.
--
Bruce A. Black
Senior Software Developer for FDR
Innovation Data
Hi all,
I'm no longer getting any messages back from the list.
Would some one be kind enough to respond to this message.
Thanks.
-
Yahoo! Mail
Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments.
Test
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Howard Rifkind
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 3:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Test - Please Reply
Hi all,
I'm no longer getting any messages back from the list.
Got it
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Howard Rifkind
Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 2:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Test - Please Reply
Hi all,
I'm no longer getting any messages back from the list.
Robert,
I suppose you have a dump when S0C4 occurs. Can you force a dump during
the OK run, for example by adding TIME=(,3) on the EXEC stmt? If you
have both dumps, you can compare them and see what's different, such as
module placement, memory allocation, etc. This may give you a clue as
Robert,
Why 4300 Cylinders for WORK01 and only 5 Cylinders for TRAM1.WORK1??
Stupid Question: Can a TEMP Dataset span a volume? Or is this a Mod-9 or
Mod-23??
Thanks...Guy M. Gates Jr.
TTI Z/OS Systems Programmer
Phone: (817) 740-9000 x-4627
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stupid Question: Can a TEMP Dataset span a volume? Or is this a Mod-9 or
Mod-23??
You bet. Just tried it, and my SRS product kicked in and added volumes to
the temp file I had allocated, just like it should.
Jeffrey Deaver, Senior Analyst, Systems Engineering
651-665-4231
I think IBM dropped the ball, here!
The intent was to allow you to encrypt removable media (AKA Tape) and pass it
to a partner, who can (in turn) decrypt it.
But, I wonder about IBM's true commitment.
The JAVA-based Encryption Facility Client is an
'as-is, unwarranted product'!
So, you are
Are the tempy files being switched to VIO at your place?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Shmuel,
I'm curious! Do you actually remember all this stuff, or do you still
have the manuals and look it up?
Eric Bielefeld
Sr. Systems Programmer
PH Mining Equipment
414-671-7849
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
- Original Message -
From: Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
Chris,
It probably looks like I have a seriously broken ALU if I say 4 years ago
on list and you were about 3 years ahead of me in the off-list
email. Faulty memory is probabably more to blame, but I actually had 2
introductions to this issue. The first was when I was first playing with
OSPF
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
I think IBM dropped the ball, here!
The intent was to allow you to encrypt removable media (AKA Tape) and pass it
to a partner, who can (in turn) decrypt it.
But, I wonder about IBM's true commitment.
The JAVA-based Encryption Facility Client is an
'as-is, unwarranted
Ted, that's *exactly* what the announcement letter said.
My bad!
I must have got my info from a different source.
I still think it's wrong.
For example, I know of a site that does a lot of media transfer with partners
who cannot even spell z/OS.
Non-encrypted is not an option, any more.
But,
In a recent note, John Eells said:
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 17:18:45 -0500
the text from IBM United States Software Announcement 205-243
September 27, 2005, IBM Encryption Facility for z/OS, V1.1 helps
Starting on October 28, 2005, you can download the Encryption
Facility for z/OS
David,
Given that you must have synchronous remote copy running against your
SORTWKnn datasets I absolutely agree. Having to Remote Copy your SORTWKnn
datasets so that Hiperswap will operate will degrade performance many
magnitudes greater than turning CFW off in the controller.
Ron
APAR OA11513 is the solution we found.
--
Jeff
Churchill, Gerald said the following on 02/24/2006 01:52 PM:
Hi, I am having a problem defining a printer for our Integrated Console
Controller.
We have a Z890 running ZOS 1.4. I have an integrated console working on
out test LPAR. I need to
64 matches
Mail list logo
