- Original Message
From: Barbara Nitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> System reset is done automagically in a parallel sysplex (note the parallel
> - the CF needs to be there) for all systems except the last one when an SFM
> policy is active. No special automation is nee
Hello folks,
we have read problems with DFSORT + z/OS 1.6 if you specify MOSIZE=MAX +
VERIFY=NO. Then jobs ends with RC0 but records are not sorted.
Problem is fixed with PK05024: INCORRECT RECORD SEQUENCE USING MEMORY
OBJECTS
Regards
It is indeed DFSMS's "global connect" that prevents a PDSE in the IPL-time
LNKLST from being deleted.
It is this area and related areas that we intend to change in z/OS V1R8.
Peter Relson
z/OS Core Technology Design
--
For IBM-M
On Thu, 20 Apr 2006 22:40:57 -0400, John S. Giltner, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I just like it when people do not focus on a specific question on
>> mine...Now...ONCE AGAIN...
>>
Well, understood, but wouldn't the question have better been asked
on a list other th
If you are right about not picking up track 0, then something has caused
this. I haven't changed my cloning process for a long-long time. I'll
try the ALLEXCP parm and report back after I migrate the current
maintenance to production. Many thanks to all.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mai
Dan Ponta wrote:
Is there somebody who has a step-by-step document of how to install SSL on
OMVS z/OS 1.4?
Thanks,
Dan
System Engineer
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [
Well, I was trying to Assemble my first assembler
DLL application program using the new macros and
I got a RC 20 and the Assembler abended in the
middle of the assembly!
Is this a known problem? Is there some maintenance
that needs to be applied?
z/OS 1.6
HLASM 5.0, PTF level UQ93163
at the poi
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 04/21/2006
at 07:50 AM, Barbara Nitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>System reset needs to be done to get rid of possibly hung RESERVES
>that were/are not cleared when the system is wait stated (or so I was
>told).
Correct. If you're not going to IPL for a while then you
I have a console set up through OSA on Z/890. The console has connected to
the OSA card prior to IPL but is not picking up console attributes at IPL.
We still need to vary the console for it to come active and it is not
getting PFKEY info. What have I missed. Again, it has established contac
Is it defined as a NIP console in your IO def?
- Original Message -
From: "Melissa Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To:
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 10:02 AM
Subject: ICC CONSOLE
I have a console set up through OSA on Z/890. The console has connected to
t
1. Make sure you're not varying it ONLINE in some COMMNDxx member. Online
and Console are two different statuses, and if it's ONLINE it won't be a
console until you vary it as a console - will be available for VTAM
though.
2. Make sure it's defined to be online at IPL though (doesn't have OFFL
I agree with you that this doesn't seem right. I think that DFHSM sends
the response back via a crossmemory TPUT to the TSO user associated with
the userid that issued the HLIST command. One can also ask for the output
to be saved in a dataset. This is probably "working as designed".
Bill
On Thu,
It is working as designed. I just ran a batch TMP and issued a HLIST
command in it. The output came back to my TSO terminal.
Mark Jacobs
Time Customer Service Inc.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Big Iron
Sent: Friday, April 21
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Big Iron
> Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 9:16 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: HL*ST displays output in wrong session
>
>
> I agree with you that this doesn't seem right. I thin
Bruce,
We are currently migrating from z/OS 1.4 to z/OS 1.7 and we had the same
problem
with our IGDACSMC (management class) exit.
It seems that at some version of DFSMS between z/OS 1.4 and 1.7 the coding
requirements
for assigning a class in the ACS exits has changed.
For some reason, this is
In a recent note, McKown, John said:
> Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 09:27:09 -0500
>
> I think you have that right! I get these stupid messages when I run a
> batch job which issues DFHSM commands. Makes me right angry! And PROFILE
> NOITERCOM does __not__ stop them. I'd like to give the DFHSM
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of McKown, John
>
> [ snip ]
>
> Right up there with the newly patented process which would
> "freeze" your TV so that you could not change the channel
> during a commercial.
Should qualify as "theft of services", for
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> In a recent note, McKown, John said:
> > I think you have that right! I get these stupid messages
> when I run a
> > batch job which issues DFHSM commands. Makes me right angry! And
> > PROFILE NOITERCOM does __not__ stop them. I'd like to give
> > the DFHSM developer w
In a recent note, Tony Harminc said:
> Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 11:15:09 -0400
>
> They evidently also failed to specify the LOWP option, which is why PROFILE
> NOINTERCOM doesn't work. This is another part of the "attitude": "Of course
> messages *I* issue are of critical importance, so I'
Hi,
We had just migrated from Line Printing to AFP Mode.
Is there a way to still printing Line Data Flux to AFP-Printers (HCD
declared as DEVICE AFP1-0) ?
These Printers are controlled by PSF witch is configured in
Deferred-Printing Mode.
Thanks.
Cordialement.
##
All,
We are evaluating making a change from MLA(1) to MLA(2). I've read
through Managing Catalogs, and there seem to be a few issues that could
present themselves in a MLA environment. I'm looking for some real
world experience, both the good things, and the pitfalls. I'm also
hoping Mark Thome
On 4/21/2006 10:59 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would appear that the TPUT macro:
# 10.2 "z/OS V1R5.0 TSO/E Programming Services"
10.2 Using the TPUT Macro Instruction to Write a Line to the Terminal
.. is being passed the wrong value in the ASIDLOC parameter.
Ought to be easy enough to
We've been MLA(2), for a about ten years. It was part of converting
from Wylbur and no real security to RACF. No problems that I'm aware of.
Dave Gibney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System Programmer(509) 335-7359
Information Technology
Washington Sta
And - to follow up on this thread a little bit,
Systems/ASM in version 1.75 introduced the '-size='
option.
On cross-platform hosts (e.g. Wayne's PC) all '-size' does
is specify the size of the in-memory temporary file. It can
be set to "-size=MAX", which means just "use memory until you're done
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 01:01:08 -0700, Walter Marguccio
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Yes, IXC102A message is very clear about when to reply DOWN. I think I
read somewhere else (SHARE or IBMMAIN)
>that DOWN must be replied only *after* the system has been reset. What I
am seeing is that delaying
>th
It works OK for me, but our HLASM 5.0 is at PTF level UK08101.
Bill
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 07:39:45 -0600, Steve Comstock
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Well, I was trying to Assemble my first assembler
>DLL application program using the new macros and
>I got a RC 20 and the Assembler abended in the
>
In one of our exits, we use TPUT with USERIDL=(15) where register 15
points to a user ID. You don't need to know the ASID. The code is fairly
old, predates some newer WTO enhancements for inserting text into
messages. WTO3 is moved into WTOAREA, then we move things into it to form
the messag
Wayne Driscoll wrote:
... I do all my compiles/assemblies on the
PC ...
I guess that means you can't take advantage of the greatly relaxed
assembler language syntax rules offered by FLOWASM. That is, unless the
PC-based assembler you use provides some sort of emulation/conversion
for runn
We copied our zOS 1.7 system (in test mode here) to another set of
dasd to be run on a different mainframe under VM.
We are getting the message
IEF431E ZERO QMPA POINTER FOUND. SWA MANAGER REASON CODE=3C
Anyone have any idea what this is referring to?
Duane
-
In a recent note, Tim Hare said:
> Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 14:49:28 -0400
>
> the message we want, and finally we TPUT it to the user. R15 in the real
> exit is set by looping through a table of users that are authorized to
> receive their notification via this method, but the point is th
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Duane Weaver
> Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 2:05 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: IEF431E ZERO QMPA POINTER FOUND. SWA MANAGER REASON CODE=3C
>
>
> We copied our zOS 1.7 system (in
What tasks are generating the message? Here the explanation for S0B0
RC3C which IEF431E points to
| 3CThe SWA Manager encountered a zero value as the pointer to
the
| QMPA while attempting to process an assign request. The most
| likely cause of this error conditio
We can't tell you. This is dependent on the system that they are using.
To put this as simple as I can, the way I understand it:
1) Any OS can support the hardware clock for the platform it is running
on to be set to local time or UTC.
2) If the OS supports the hardware clock set to UTC it w
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 04/21/2006
at 01:13 PM, Walt Farrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I believe that HSM specifically looks for the TSO session with a
>matching user ID and issues the TPUT to that ASID, as it's the only
>one that it can be sure is correct at that moment.
So if the user
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 04/20/2006
at 10:10 AM, Thomas Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I hope I don't sound too stupid here, but I am trying to define an
>AS400 to the mainframe (a z/os system).
Define as what?
>Previously this AS400 was defined using a
>SWNET definition which pointed
This is how one would look like in the VTAM side.
AS400SWN VBUILD TYPE=SWNET,X
MAXGRP=5, X
MAXNO=12
*
As I understand this explanation, system reset is a definitive manual
action that guarantees the 'down-ness' of a system. Like the hunter
'making sure' his buddy is really dead. But a total lack of vital signs,
like the TV-familiar solid hum of the life monitor, serves the same
purpose. Plus th
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> In a recent note, Tim Hare said:
> > If the user is signed on, the message is sent to them, interrupting
> > whatever they're doing. If they're not signed on, I believe it goes
> > nowhere (maybe their LOG file).
> >
> That appears to be an unsolicited message, quite dif
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 15:07:42 -0500, Desi de la Garza
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>This is how one would look like in the VTAM side.
>
>AS400SWN VBUILD TYPE=SWNET,X
>...
>AS400PU PUADDR=12,X
> ...
>
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 13:23:56 -0700, Skip Robinson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>As I understand this explanation, system reset is a definitive manual
>action that guarantees the 'down-ness' of a system. Like the hunter
>'making sure' his buddy is really dead. But a total lack of vital signs,
>like
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 04/19/2006
at 01:44 PM, Paul Dineen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I'm wondering if others have had difficulty with PDSE's which are
>included in LNKLST at IPL time, specifically deletion of them?
AFAIK you can't delete a PDS either, although you can create a new
list th
In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 04/20/2006
at 07:19 AM, Peter Relson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I get very frustrated when I continue to read posts about deleting
>libraries from the LNKLST.
That's only one of many unsafe practices that I've seen advocated.
It's not my dog.
>Anything that intends
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
04/18/2006
at 12:33 PM, "Kittendorf, Craig"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>System symbols are also allowed in "started jobs" which are similar
>to "started tasks."
Also APPC and LOGON, for APPC transactions and TSO session logons.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, Sys
In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 04/18/2006
at 12:57 PM, "Schramm, Rob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I wonder if IBM would consider providing a USERMOD that would perform
>symbol conversion on the system that the job actually executes (thus
>preserving the "just like a started task")
There's more invo
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 04/21/2006
at 03:48 PM, "John S. Giltner, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>1) Any OS can support the hardware clock for the platform it is
>running on to be set to local time or UTC.
Alas, no.
>It does not matter if it is a mainframe, a RISC box, PC, MAC, or any
> ot
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 15:48:02 -0400, John S. Giltner, Jr.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>We can't tell you. This is dependent on the system that they are using.
>...
It also depends on how the time is set on the system at hand.
If the time is manually set then all bets are off. The most accurate
c
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz wrote:
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 04/19/2006
at 01:44 PM, Paul Dineen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
I'm wondering if others have had difficulty with PDSE's which are
included in LNKLST at IPL time, specifically deletion of them?
AFAIK you can't delete a PDS eit
After spending hours and hours the last few days cleaning out the
subscriber list of bad address, I have become less tolerant of
some email rejections. So, as of now, I will start removing
subscribers that I receive numerous rejection notices from their
mailers.
If the connection to your mailer ti
As I understand this explanation, system reset is a definitive manual
action that guarantees the 'down-ness' of a system. Like the hunter
'making sure' his buddy is really dead. But a total lack of vital signs,
like the TV-familiar solid hum of the life monitor, serves the same
purpose. Plus
Without mining thru previous posts--I thought the dangling issue was the
last system down, where SFM no longer has the power to initiate a cleanup.
Isn't that the case where system reset is proposed as necessary?
Mark Zelden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
04/21/
To shut down, we VARY XCF OFF. The HMC beeps and turns red. We move on. No
system reset.
Bruce Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
04/21/2006 03:20 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Fw: IXC102A automat
In a recent note, Tony Harminc said:
> Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 16:26:33 -0400
>
> Probably some sort of client-server scheme is what's needed. Indeed that's
> what we do with TSO commands in our product set; the data is returned
> cross-memory, and the TPUTs (well, PUTLINEs actually, so as
So many responses, so little I know. I believe the project (as my boss is
wont to call it) to connect the 'new' as400 to the mainframe, is probably
(but I'm not completely sure of this) going to be running the same programs
the older one did. They did mostly inhouse apps of a database nature, and
s
In a recent note, Tony Harminc said:
> Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 16:26:33 -0400
>
> But as someone else pointed out, the ASID can change between your request
> and the TPUTs.
>
Some experiments convince me that HSM is smarter than you give
it credit for, which gives it far less excuse to be
To shut down, we VARY XCF OFF. The HMC beeps and turns red. We move on. No
system reset.
The VARY XCF OFF puts the system in a wait state, thus the red icon.
But it does not do a system reset. Obviously you can get away without
it, but I recommend it
--
Bruce Black
Senior Software Develop
Thomas,
This is becoming like some detective story where clues are being left but
it's not sure which clues are useful and which are red herrings.
At least we now know that this concerns both SNA *and* IP communications - I
think. If the supplied sample definition is supposed to be a guide to wha
Shmuel Metz , Seymour J. wrote:
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 04/21/2006
at 03:48 PM, "John S. Giltner, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
1) Any OS can support the hardware clock for the platform it is
running on to be set to local time or UTC.
Alas, no.
I guess my wording is a bit unclear.
I am not sure what you mean "program the time/date in UTC", but the
Cobol function CURRENT-DATE will return the current local date and time
and the UTC offset. This does assume that the system you are running
the cobol program on is setup so that it running with the correct local
UTC offset.
Hi,
One of our team here is experiencing a severe performance issue while
running a job. They asked for a Strobe trace which says Extended Cross memory
access is eating up most of the CPU time. Any guess on what could be the reason.
Thanks in Advance,
Shaja
**
59 matches
Mail list logo
