Re: IBM TCPIP TELNET LINEMODE

Kevin, I assume by "TN3270 TELNET" you are referring to the TN3270 Telnet Server as documented in Chapter 13 of the z/OS 1.7 CS IP Configuration Reference manual.[1]. Are there perhaps some undesirable characters present also with the text asking for the application name? I would expect so. It's

SYS1.PARMLIB(PROG00) vs. RACF DSMON Report

Greetings! Odd question. Is it possible to have APF/LNKLST libraries reported or locatable by the RACF DSMON (Data Security Monitor) report, but not listed in the SYS1.PARMLIB(PROG00) member? I ran a comparison between the two and found three libraries on DSMON that weren't in the PROG00, and

Re: ISPF Option 3.4 and System Search for all Files with A*.NC2.*

Glen.Gasior wrote: I would not assume the search done by ISPF is the same as the search done by DFSMSDSS. ISPF will search through all catalogs and not limit itself to the standard catalog search if there is a wildcard in the first hlq. I do not know about DFSMSDSS. You may need to know the detai

Re: IEC141I 013-C0 during SUBSYS open

Victor, So does it work now? -- Tom Schmidt Madison, WI On Mon, 1 May 2006 14:02:06 -0500, Victor Gil wrote: >Auch! This must be > > MVC SSOBRETN,=A(SSRTOK) > >Thanks a lot, Binyamin! > >On Mon, 1 May 2006 13:57:22 -0500, Victor Gil wrote: > >>MVC SSOBRETN,=Y(SSRTOK) >> >>On Mon, 1 Ma

Re: ISPF Option 3.4 and System Search for all Files with A*.NC2.*

Yes, whenever you are doing a destructive function you should ALWAYS make sure you know what's going to happen BEFORE you do it for real. It's always a good idea! Greg > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin > Sent

Re: XIOC-3270TN Emulation screens?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have been searching for this for hours now on Google but no luck. Because I went to my bank today and I noticed and black TN3270 console screen on top of Win2000 so I looked over and at the top it said "xioc3270tn" And at the botton, while she was checking my Credit Sc

Re: Cant find reason code root syt

Sounds like you aren't using shared HFS, and have that root mounted SHR elsewhere. If you are trying to mount it as R/W so you can do some maint, it won't work. Shane ... -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instr

Re: PDS Directory Question

On May 1, 2006, at 2:31 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 04/30/2006 at 04:34 PM, Ed Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: IEHMOVE was a dog. I've got the ASPCA on line three demanding a retraction. Retraction? I will even go further it was a snail. Ed (who likes

Re: IEFACTRT and routing questions

I was able to eliminate the IEF170I on STCs by setting the MCSFLAG field in IEEACTRT to the following: MCSFLAG DCB'1000' *0123456789ABCDEF The WTO now goes to our consoles and to hardcopy since our hardcopy is defined as ROUTCODE(ALL) in our CONSOLXX mem

Re: PDS Directory Question

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 04/30/2006 at 04:34 PM, Ed Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >IEHMOVE was a dog. I've got the ASPCA on line three demanding a retraction. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see We don

Re: Need Help defining an AS400 with an IP address to the mainframe

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 05/01/2006 at 02:36 PM, "Patrick O'Keefe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >Well, you're the one with the FAP; I can only argue from what I >remember, and that memory is over 15 years old. My recolection is >that node type wasn't code at all; that it was a description of

Re: ISPF Option 3.4 and System Search for all Files with A*.NC2.*

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 05/01/2006 at 03:16 PM, Robert Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >He wants to automate the functionality of ISPF Option 3.4 where you >can do generic searches for files. FDREPORT. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see

Re: Batch JCL on Windows/.NET ???

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 05/01/2006 at 01:58 AM, Hal Merritt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >I have been curious about this so called "Christmas Tree Virus" for >many years. I hear it mentioned, but have never been able to verify >it as a real event or urban legend. It was a real event and it was

Re: PDS Directory Question

Message PDS100I displays the date of the version (8.6.02) release. CONTROL PDS will display the assembly date. Version 8.6.03 is available on the Updates page of CBT. Regards, John Kalinich Computer Sciences Corp "John M. Cullen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List

Re: Batch JCL on Windows/.NET ???

You're right, of course. I had forgotten that part. PROFS notes had no ability to execute anything. We've made so much "progress" now with HTML and VBS e-mails that I had forgotten how primitive things were in the bad old days. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion Li

Re: IBM TCPIP TELNET LINEMODE

Klein, Kevin wrote: > We're doing a POC on a new product that requires a TN3270 > TELNET connection to z/OS 1.7 in LINEMODE protocol. These two don't really go together. Either you are running TN3270 or plain telnet. A few clients will do both, e.g. IBM's mainframe-based ones, and there is a neg

IBM TCPIP TELNET LINEMODE

We're doing a POC on a new product that requires a TN3270 TELNET connection to z/OS 1.7 in LINEMODE protocol. I have virtually no experience with TCPIP and our network guy hasn't had much to do with any LINEMODE applications. When we execute the "open" command in the telnet session, it comes b

Re: PDSEs in LNKLST at IPL can't be deleted

>I dynamically removed it from LLA and XCFAS. Anybody try this? Anybody consider that we are trying to keep the system up as long as possible? Without corruption? Why are we trying to outsmart protection. If it doesn't work that way, why fart with it? I'd rather have the system up an working, th

Re: PDSEs in LNKLST at IPL can't be deleted

I have the same problem with z/os 1.6 SYS1.SIEALNKE which is a new link list that IBM is pusing modules to. I can rename it, but not delete it. I wonder what would happen if I renamed the PDSE and then allocated it under it's original name. I dynamically removed it from LLA and XCFAS. Anybody

Re: ISPF Option 3.4 and System Search for all Files with A*.NC2.*

In a recent note, Chase, John said: > Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 14:28:41 -0500 > > > -Original Message- > > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert Pelletier > > Hi All. Once again I turn to the group for help. The > > > > He wants to automate the functionality of ISP

Re: ESO Tape Load Question/Help

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin > Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 1:10 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: ESO Tape Load Question/Help > > > In a recent note, Chase, John said: > > > Date: Mon

Just the DLL stuff

Based on a number of requests, I have built a one-day class to cover just the DLL material from the course I announced last week. So we now offer: "Creating and Using DLLs in z/OS" which is a one-day multi-lingual (Assembler, COBOL, PL/I, and C) course in how to construct DLLs and how to access DL

Re: Batch JCL on Windows/.NET ???

Charles Mills wrote: [CHRISTMA EXEC] > I remember it. It was a real event. I was working closely with IBM at > the time. I had a BP or similar IBM PROFS account. > > It was a Christmas greeting in the PROFS system that when you opened > it, it executed a script that re-sent the greeting to every

Cant find reason code root syt

On Monday May 1, 2006 at 15:05, Dave Guthrie wrote to IBM-Main: > I'm trying to look up the rc/reason code. > On an adcd z/os 1.6 system, I've recently been getting this message: > > BPXF029E ROOT FILE SYSTEM HFS.ADCDPL.ROOT 440 WAS NOT MOUNTED. RETURN > CODE = 0072, REASON CODE = 5B220117

Re: Dataset Contention

Acutally, if the jobs are running consecutively, at pretty much the same time, PAV will not be that great a help. The PAV is designed for multiple accesses on different extents. Since all the jobs will be acessing the same extent range, only one UCB will probably be used. Not true. If the DEF

Re: PDS Directory Question

Ok now a new PDS version. I get "PDS100I A -- VERSION 8.6.02 FEBRUARY 22, 2006" when I start the new one from the CBT site.http://www.cbttape.org/ That date may be when I assembled it. Cheers, John -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe

Re: Need Help defining an AS400 with an IP address to the mainframe

On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 23:35:18 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: >... >No, you just didn't think it through. The Devil is in the details. >... >The entire node is a chunk of code. There is no node type for the >hardware itself. >... Well, you're the one with the FAP; I can only argue from wha

Re: ISPF Option 3.4 and System Search for all Files with A*.NC2.*

Thanks John. Great idea. Bob -Original Message- From: Chase, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 3:29 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: ISPF Option 3.4 and System Search for all Files with A*.NC2.* > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussio

Re: ISPF Option 3.4 and System Search for all Files with A*.NC2.*

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert Pelletier > > Hi All. Once again I turn to the group for help. The > programming manager would like a way to delete all files on > the system as such daily > : > A*.NC2.* > > He wants to automate the functio

Re: Cant find reason code root syt

Dave, I am running 1.4 rather than 1.6, but the 1.4 doc has the following documentation. BPXF029E is as you have documented. Going to the USS messages manual and looking up hex return code of 0072, it shows as a description: The resource is busy (lot's of help there ;-) ) The reaso

RMM VRS and VTS - Location Question.

Hello to everyone, In our site we are starting to direct all creation of our Physical tapes to Virtual Tapes. In this migration we are also going to direct the DR tapes to the VTS and then use OPENTECH product to copy them to phisical tape(3592 Media). We found that some datasets created in vir

Re: Cant find reason code root syt

seems to be an enq failure. could be an un-unique name, ie grs broadcasting the name Jack Kelly LA Systems @ US Courts x 202-502-2390 -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTE

ISPF Option 3.4 and System Search for all Files with A*.NC2.*

Hi All. Once again I turn to the group for help. The programming manager would like a way to delete all files on the system as such daily : A*.NC2.* He wants to automate the functionality of ISPF Option 3.4 where you can do generic searches for files. We are OS/390 V2R10. Any suggestions would be

Cant find reason code root syt

I'm trying to look up the rc/reason code. On an adcd z/os 1.6 system, I've recently been getting this message: BPXF029E ROOT FILE SYSTEM HFS.ADCDPL.ROOT 440 WAS NOT MOUNTED. RETURN CODE = 0072, REASON CODE = 5B220117 Look at pointed to: z/OS V1R6.0 MVS System Messages, Vol 3 (ASB-BPX): 8.34

Re: IEC141I 013-C0 during SUBSYS open

Auch! This must be MVC SSOBRETN,=A(SSRTOK) Thanks a lot, Binyamin! On Mon, 1 May 2006 13:57:22 -0500, Victor Gil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >MVC SSOBRETN,=Y(SSRTOK) > >On Mon, 1 May 2006 21:05:38 +0300, Binyamin Dissen ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>What about SSOBRETN? --

Re: IEC141I 013-C0 during SUBSYS open

MVC SSOBRETN,=Y(SSRTOK) On Mon, 1 May 2006 21:05:38 +0300, Binyamin Dissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >What about SSOBRETN? -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wi

Re: Dataset Contention

I have seen the posts mentioning HiperBatch but I would have thought that BatchPipes would have given you the same performance benefit if not better. BatchPipes is a paid feature I believe though. If processing the file by multiple jobs as soon as it is created is the goal, then wouldn't BatchPip

ICSF Keys

Hello all, I have a question. When I generated my data encryption keys under ICSF the panels didn't require an entry to designate whether they were 3DES, DES or AES encryption keys. How does one know what kind of key was generated? Or does it matter? Thanks in advance Mike! ==

Re: Dataset Contention

In a message dated 5/1/2006 1:38:21 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >PAV is designed for multiple >accesses on different extents. 2105 PAV will allow up to 8 simultaneous reads of the same single track if none of those read commands is in a channel program that has s

Re: Dataset Contention

Acutally, if the jobs are running consecutively, at pretty much the same time, PAV will not be that great a help. The PAV is designed for multiple accesses on different extents. Since all the jobs will be acessing the same extent range, only one UCB will probably be used. I like the idea of usin

Re: ESO Tape Load Question/Help

In a recent note, Chase, John said: > Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 11:09:21 -0500 > > Looks like SYSUT1 is too small > As an ISV employee, I struggle with the question of what SPACE parameters to recommend to our customers. Is there any report which gives the highwater mark usage of tempor

Re: IEC141I 013-C0 during SUBSYS open

On Mon, 1 May 2006 11:56:37 -0500 Victor Gil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: :>It's the subsystem I am developing. It has received the subsystem Open :>request for dd=INFILE and succesfully opened another, "redirected" ddname. :>However, upon returning back to MVS I am getting :>IEC141I 013-C0,IGG01

Re: SORT help - to split by delimiters

On Aug 6, 2005, Ramya Ramaswamy wrote: > I have a requirement which states like this: > > Given records like > > 1~ABC~99.99~12345 > 123~AB~9.99~567 > 34~c~1.99~345 > > where there are 4 fields in each record, each separated by a '~'. The third > field is the price field, which i need to sum up.

Re: Batch JCL on Windows/.NET ???

Hal Merritt wrote: I have been curious about this so called "Christmas Tree Virus" for many years. I hear it mentioned, but have never been able to verify it as a real event or urban legend. CHRISTMA EXEC was real. IIRC (perhaps not, it's been a Long Time), it read your NAMES file and sen

Re: ESO Tape Load Question/Help

Thanks, Ed, John and ALL, I changed all the SYSUTx DDDF's sizes. Ed Finnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In a message dated 5/1/2006 11:06:19 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: IEC030I B37-04,IFG0554A,SHUUSR3X,STEP01,SYSUT1,0A95,WORK11,SYS06121.T1 019.RA000.SHUUSR3X.R0102113

Re: IEC141I 013-C0 during SUBSYS open

Bruce, It's the subsystem I am developing. It has received the subsystem Open request for dd=INFILE and succesfully opened another, "redirected" ddname. However, upon returning back to MVS I am getting IEC141I 013-C0,IGG0199G,xxx,STEP2,INFILE What ACB field other than ACBINRTN and ACBERFL

Re: IEC141I 013-C0 during SUBSYS open

What sort of subsystem was involved (JES or something else)? Did you get more messages (probably in the SYSMSGS)? From recent postings, I got the impression that Victor was writing his own subsystem. From: Bruce Black <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List To: IBM-MA

Re: ESO Tape Load Question/Help

In a message dated 5/1/2006 11:06:19 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: IEC030I B37-04,IFG0554A,SHUUSR3X,STEP01,SYSUT1,0A95,WORK11,SYS06121.T1 019.RA000.SHUUSR3X.R0102113 >> The problem is size of SYSUT1 and probably 3,4,5, and 6. Think defaults are defined in profile

Re: IEC141I 013-C0 during SUBSYS open

Victor, the doc for 013-C0 is poorly written. It says "An open failure occurred for a subsystem data set. Possible failures follow: O A SYSIN or SYSOUT data set opened by JES

Re: ESO Tape Load Question/Help

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Rifkind > > Sorry forgot to include this console message: > > *IEF233A M 0501,G04501,,SHUUSR3X,STEP01,HOLDDATA > IEC030I > B37-04,IFG0554A,SHUUSR3X,STEP01,SYSUT1,0A95,WORK11,SYS06121.T1 > 019.RA000.SH

Re: ESO Tape Load Question/Help

Howard, In the message IEC030I B37-04,IFG0554A,SHUUSR3X,STEP01,SYSUT1,0A95,WORK11,SYS06121.T SYSUT! is the DD statement that is experiencing the B37. Since you don;t have as SYUT1 in the JCL it must be using the one defined in the DDDEFs. Either add a SYSUT1 to the JCL with greater size or us

Re: ESO Tape Load Question/Help

Sorry forgot to include this console message: *IEF233A M 0501,G04501,,SHUUSR3X,STEP01,HOLDDATA IEC030I B37-04,IFG0554A,SHUUSR3X,STEP01,SYSUT1,0A95,WORK11,SYS06121.T1 019.RA000.SHUUSR3X.R0102113 Work11 is 99% free. Howard Rifkind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm trying to recieve

Re: ESO Tape Load Question/Help

Yes John, the DDDF's are defined. "Chase, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Rifkind > > I'm trying to recieve an ESO tape and using the same JCL > which worked before. However now at what appears to be the >

Re: ESO Tape Load Question/Help

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Rifkind > > I'm trying to recieve an ESO tape and using the same JCL > which worked before. However now at what appears to be the > end of the tape there is an SB37 error which doesn't make > sence to be bec

ESO Tape Load Question/Help

I'm trying to recieve an ESO tape and using the same JCL which worked before. However now at what appears to be the end of the tape there is an SB37 error which doesn't make sence to be because the ESO tapes are one volume only, If you have more then one then I used a concatenated DD for the ne

IEC141I 013-C0 during SUBSYS open

Good morning, IBM-MAIN The doc lists 3 possible reasons for IEC141I 013-C0 [see http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi- bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/IEA2M751/SPTEE141I] Do they make any sense to anybody? I am guessing the error is probably due to the way the subsystem was started - via SETSSI ADD comma

Re: Dataset Contention

"Bob Shannon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > >"How many jobs can access a DISK DSN with a DISP=SHR before any > >performance degradation occurs due to access contention? > > >"Meaning, We have 1 dataset sitting on disk, we have 35 jobs that need > >to access t

Re: IEFACTRT and routing questions

I'm also kind of curious why the IEF170I message comes up for STC's It appears to have something to do with the MCSFLAGS. University Information Management Systems George Dranes Manager-Technical Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] Morgan Hall 121 1 University Circ

Re: Dataset Contention

"Meaning, We have 1 dataset sitting on disk, we have 35 jobs that need to access this one dataset, how many jobs can run at one time accessing this one dataset before the access creates contention and stops jobs from running?" To answer that explicit question, never! I/O contention can slow down

Re: Dataset Contention

>"How many jobs can access a DISK DSN with a DISP=SHR before any >performance degradation occurs due to access contention? >"Meaning, We have 1 dataset sitting on disk, we have 35 jobs that need >to access this one dataset, how many jobs can run at one time accessing >this one dataset before the

Re: Redirect the joblog to mvs syslog when job abend ?

As a more straightforward alternative, consider your JCL OUTPUT statement options, specifically the JESDS, DEFAULT and OUTDISP parameters, for conditionally redirecting job output when a job ABENDs, either to a physical output device, a special JES queue, or if you must, an output class serviced by

Re: Sarbanes-Oxley

Charles, How about passing laws which allow scrutiny of an enterprise's operation much more easily that is currently allowed? That could so increase the deterrent effect that less law-breaking resulted. So by passing such laws some of "them" will be stopped. Historically over the twentieth century

Re: Batch JCL on Windows/.NET ???

Yes it was real. See page 43 of Melinda Varian's paper. http://www.princeton.edu/~melinda/25paper.pdf Best Regards, Sam Knutson, GEICO Performance and Availability Management mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (office) 301.986.3

Re: PDS 8.6 (Was: PDS Directory Question)

Eric, PDS86 should run under MVS 3.8 and Herc if it is compiled with the #PDSGENH member. I believe there is a MVS 3.8 load module version on CBT file 135 called PDS8638. Greg Price has reported that it runs OK in the Hercules environment. I think 8.6 was first on the CBT Updates page in the Se

Re: Dataset Contention

On Mon, 1 May 2006 08:45:46 -0500 "Chase, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: :>The following question was posed in our shop recently: :>"How many jobs can access a DISK DSN with a DISP=SHR before any :>performance degradation occurs due to access contention? :>"Meaning, We have 1 dataset sitting

Re: Sarbanes-Oxley

Badly OT but yes, Enron (apparently) violated then-existing laws. How passing additional laws will help is beyond many experts. Some people will always violate the law. Passing additional laws won't stop them. Charles -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: PDS 8.6 (Was: PDS Directory Question)

Hi John, When did PDS 8.6 come out? I don't remember seeing that, unless I've been running it all along and forgot the number. I can't go check anymore as our system is gone. I remember downloading something several months ago and just putting it in a steplib so I wouldn't have to make any

Re: IEFACTRT and routing questions

On Mon, 2006-05-01 at 08:35 -0500, George Dranes wrote: > This output is only written to Hardcopy, not the consoles. In our exit we > let the ROUTE codes and MCSFLAGS default. We use ROUTCDE=(13),DESC=(6) and then configure SYS1.PARMLIB(CONSOLxx) appropriately to route the messages where we want.

Re: Batch JCL on Windows/.NET ???

I remember it. It was a real event. I was working closely with IBM at the time. I had a BP or similar IBM PROFS account. It was a Christmas greeting in the PROFS system that when you opened it, it executed a script that re-sent the greeting to everyone in your PROFS address book. IBM had to take d

Dataset Contention

Hi, All, The following question was posed in our shop recently: "How many jobs can access a DISK DSN with a DISP=SHR before any performance degradation occurs due to access contention? "Meaning, We have 1 dataset sitting on disk, we have 35 jobs that need to access this one dataset, how many jo

IEFACTRT and routing questions

We have been using a stripped down version of the sample IEEACTRT for years now to write job and step return codes to the consoles and I've always noticed when starting or stopping an STC we receive an IEF170I message immediately following the expected IEFACTRT WTO. For example: IEF170I 1 SUBMIT

Re: Submitting job using ReXX

Wade Curry wrote: Rashmi Nijaguni Mogali([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 03:39:07PM +0530: The job looks something like this: //S2C9011 JOB (S2C9,XX,TI),'', // MSGCLASS=T, // NOTIFY=&SYSUID,

[Re: SMP/E Internet Service Retrival]

What do you do for this? GIM69147WSMP/E WAITED 120 MINUTES BUT ORDER ORD1 IS NOT READY That's extremely common. If you get too many of these, try the alternate server. For the most part when an order times out and you get the GIM69147W message, it usually implies the backend servers

Re: Submitting job using ReXX

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Wade Curry > > Rashmi Nijaguni [EMAIL PROTECTED], Apr 26, 2006 at 03:39:07PM +0530: > > > The job looks something like this: > > > //S2C9011 JOB (S2C9,XX,TI),'', > > // MSGCLASS=T,

PDS 8.6 (Was: PDS Directory Question)

Eric, An even better tool is the PDS 8.6 tool from the CBT site with PDSE, ISPF Search-For, and TSO XMIT support. Regards, John Kalinich Computer Sciences Corp "Eric N.

Re: Submitting job using ReXX

Tim Hare([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 08:30:52AM -0400: > >> //S2C9011 JOB (S2C9,XX,TI),'', > >> // MSGCLASS=T, > >> // NOTIFY=&SYSUID, > >> //*TYPRUN=SCAN, > >> // CLASS=X > >> //* > >> //PROCLIB JCLLIB ORDER=(PROD.PROC.LIB,PROD.PR

Re: Sub-capacity charging - food for thought

>I am surprised nobody mentioned subcapacity CBU possibility. It was also >driven by customer demands. Excellent point. Also Capacity On Demand granularity, including single day. I'll add yet another factor: variation in how SMP-tuned our customers' workloads are. More granularity in capacity s