I sent the question below to the Flex list but got no response. Anyone
using Redhat 8 on this list that could help.
I've produced a couple of redhat 8 recovery tapes recently and the backup
procedure in both cases has ended with -
1+0 records in
1+0 records out
Is this correct. I
Dear list,
This is the log from a HRECOVER command.
PAGE 0001 5695-DF175 DFSMSDSS V1R3.0 DATA SET SERVICES
2006.178 08:09
ADR035I (SCH)-PRIME(06), INSTALLATION EXIT ALTERED BYPASS FAC CLASS CHK
DEFAULT TO YES
RESTORE INDDNAME(SYS23630) CATODY((STP040)) -
Your REGION seems to be exhausted. What environment does
that program run in?
TSO BATCH - with REGION=0M
bye,
Michael
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
Shmuel,
I didn't realize that Lamah appeared in Biblical Hebrew.
The concordance is Matthew 27: 46. Fortunately, William Tyndale, probably
the author, understood the need to cater for monoglots and so, having quoted
the Hebrew (or Aramaic?), provided the translation into English - which,
more
Do you have an IEFUSI exit that limits your storage???
Jon L. Veilleux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(860) 636-2683
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael Knigge
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 5:32 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:
In a recent note, Gerhard Postpischil said:
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 23:14:51 -0400
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Ah, but how do you add the flag bit without making the record at
least one bit longer?
You don't. But most compression programs already have a few bits to
indicate the type
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex R.
From what I was able to get out of the settlement papers, the
remedy is that owners can download a copy of backup/restore
software. Here is a line from the document.
But the proposed settlement
IBM just updated the 1-byte Tracker Exclusion list at:
http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/downloads/
This may be a good time to SHARE that we only have a handful of vendors
left who have not provided fixes after having completed all the review
and remediation to be fully
##
# This email and all files transmitted with it are confidential and #
# intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they #
# are addressed.
Hi all
Have a possibility the user of USS-OMVS submit job to MVS as batch with
change in member of SYS1.PARMLIB BPXPRMxx or in other member ?? In the
example below of display SDSF the user run a process as STC, but I need
modify for batch. The system are OS/390 2.10 compatibility mode.
JOBNAME
How much storage did the jobstep get / use
according to the joblog?
JESYSMSG tells me:
IEF374I STEP/TESTME/STOP 2006177.1542
CPU0MIN 00.13SEC
SRB0MIN 00.00SEC
VIRT 8304K
SYS 380K
EXT2952K
SYS 10356K
I hope that I will find some time tomorrow to run this application
Do you have an IEFUSI exit that limits your storage???
Sorry, don't know
Michael
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search
I only skimmed through the document, but it appears that WDC simploy settled to
avoid the uncertainties of litigation, or something like that. Having seen
some of the vagaries of juries, I would have a hard time arguing with their
decision to settle.
Jon
snip
Why didn't the WD lawyers
In a message dated 6/27/2006 5:02:06 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The concordance is Matthew 27: 46. Fortunately, William Tyndale, probably
the author, understood the need to cater for monoglots and so, having quoted
the Hebrew (or Aramaic?)
I believe you meant
Clayton Buck
Lead System Performance/Capacity Planning Analyst
UniGroup, Inc.
636-349-2859
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom
From today's announcements
906137 Hardware withdrawal: IBM Sysplex Timer Model 2 and Sysplex
Timer LED/Laser Extender -- Replacement available
_http://www.ibm.com/isource/cgi-bin/goto?it=usa_annredon=906-137_
(http://www.ibm.com/isource/cgi-bin/goto?it=usa_annredon=906-137)
The replacement
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 01:31:24 +0200, Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Ed,
This is what most of my posts are like until I let the spelling checker
loose on them.
This is very interesting when considered together with the big arguments
surrounding the teaching of reading in the recent past in
Has anyone seen the documentation for Server Time Protocol (STP) which
is suppose to replace the 9037?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Finnell
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 7:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: 9037
The virtual 8304K looks suspicious. normally that means some 24bit code
because there isn't as much usage of EXT (above the line private).
Mike
JESYSMSG tells me:
IEF374I STEP/TESTME/STOP 2006177.1542
CPU0MIN 00.13SEC
SRB0MIN 00.00SEC
VIRT 8304K
SYS 380K
EXT2952K
SYS
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 06:36:57 -0600, Paul Gilmartin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip!
That said, it appears that a program object (original topic) at
least in UNIX FS appears always to start with the string IEWPLMH .
So if a compressed file is guaranteed not to start with that
string, it can be
In a message dated 6/27/2006 9:59:17 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Has anyone seen the documentation for Server Time Protocol (STP) which
is suppose to replace the 9037?
I just clicked on the links in the announcement.
Preview — Server Time Protocol (STP)
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 10:08:45 -0400, Jon Brock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I only skimmed through the document, but it appears that WDC simploy
settled to avoid the uncertainties of litigation, or something like
that. Having seen some of the vagaries of juries, I would have a hard
time arguing with
Agreed. And I had a similar experience. These days I m ight take him to court
anyway.
Jon
snip
Yes, but it's still repulsive.
I had to pay some guy $200 a few years ago when I was selling a house
because he had a quit claim deed from someone who had no claim on the
property. It would have
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 01:38:39 +0200, Chris Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Patrick and Daniel,
I think that note may sound more alarming than it should. The
communication errors that may be caused are not very likely and, for any
one application, may never be experienced. I expect the should not
That's just IBM's Blue smoke.
I'm at z/OS 1.7 now and there isn't any mention of STP in the
documentation that I have.
What I want to know/understand is how to connect a z/900 and a z/890 in
a SYSPLEX with the z/890 running STP...Is there an advantage to
implement STP on the z/890 now or should
Ed,
it's actually a small reprieve.. it was previously announced to go end
of June 2006..
Roy
From today's announcements
906137 Hardware withdrawal: IBM Sysplex Timer Model 2 and Sysplex
Timer LED/Laser Extender -- Replacement available
In a message dated 6/27/2006 10:32:39 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
it's actually a small reprieve.. it was previously announced to go end
of June 2006..
Right. My suspicion is that it may get another one as folks realize this
means they have to be off z/800s
All,
We applied that fix per an IBM hit on similar items, to no avail. I
think it's an Extra/Attachmate issue which is also being pursued.
Who is using PCOM - and how easy was it?
Who is using Reflection - and how easy was it?
Remember, it's the ICC portion of the OSA-C adapter that
James, no smoke. It is still announced only in preview mode, so no
deliverables yet.
Regarding z800- it will not support STP - look into announcement, z990+
Marian Gasparovic
IBM Slovakia
On 6/27/06, James Chappell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's just IBM's Blue smoke.
I'm at z/OS 1.7 now and
William M. Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Try asking this in IBM-MAIN (not the COBOL forum)
--
Bill Klein
wmklein at ix.netcom.com
Cezanne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all,
Is there any utility or tool that, when fed
Humm...You can tell me when something is going away...But its
replacement is still in preview modenice!
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marian Gasparovic
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 8:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Innovation Data Processing's FDRREORG product could be used to do this.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 6/27/2006 11:49 AM
William M. Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Try asking this in IBM-MAIN (not the COBOL forum)
--
Bill Klein
wmklein at ix.netcom.com
Cezanne
In a message dated 6/27/2006 10:49:29 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Humm...You can tell me when something is going away...But its
replacement is still in preview modenice!
FWIW It looks like the 1.7 manuals online are being updated to reflect
changes
Innovation Data Processing's FDRREORG product could be used to do this.
True, FDRREORG can release space while reorganizing the VSAM clusters,
but our COMPAKTOR product (aka FDRCPK and FASTCPK) would be the product
of choice to quickly release excess space from VSAM clusters (and other
Thanx to Bill Godfrey, the tr -d did the trick. I am sorry about the
confusion, I made a mistake in my initial analysis in that an ascii file
with 0A0D that is FTP'd in ASCII mode is changed to a single x'15',
thanx to Paul Gilmartin for pointing that out. I also said that after
transferring I
Is there an advantage to implement STP on the z/890 now or should I what for
z/9
replacements next spring?
Don't hold your breath.
--
Phil Payne
http://www.isham-research.co.uk
+44 7833 654 800
--
For IBM-MAIN
In a recent note, Taylor, Clarence B said:
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 12:07:21 -0400
What I want and now seems to work is a way to package up an entire
directory structure and its files on a PC, transmit them to uss via ftp,
and then restore that structure at the desired mount point.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim McAlpine
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 3:27 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Redhat emergency recovery tape backup
I sent the question below to the Flex list but got no
I think that withdrawn from marketing also means that if I order a new
z/9 after December 06 that I can't order the timer connection feature to
allow it to connect to the 9037's that I have now.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
John,
On my FLEX-ES system, the backup command is:
dd if=/dev/sda of=/dev/st1 bs=4096
I imagine it's similar for most of the Redhat FLEX-ES implementations.
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 11:50:17 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary DiPillo
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 12:06 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Redhat emergency recovery tape backup
John,
On my FLEX-ES system, the backup command is:
Eureka!
CONSOLE DEVNUM(D907) UNIT(3277-2)/* MCONS -- ICC D907 */
set unit from 3270-X to 3277-2
NAME(DEVOSC04) AUTH(MASTER) USE(FC) ROUTCODE(ALL)
ALTGRP(DEVOSALT) CON(N) DEL(RD)
RNUM(13) SEG(14) AREA(NONE) RTME(1/4) MFORM(J,T)
PFKTAB(PFKTAB00)
Brad,
There are some sample Ant scripts for Eclipse in the XmlSample project
at dovetail.com that handle this.
Kirk
Taylor, Clarence B wrote:
Thanx to Bill Godfrey, the tr -d did the trick. I am sorry about the
confusion, I made a mistake in my initial analysis in that an ascii file
with
Hi,
Working with CA we recently obtained a fix to eliminate use of user key
common storage by CA-BUNDL.
PRODUCT: CA-BundlRELEASE: 5.0
APAR #: QO80128 DATE:26 JUN 2006
PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: GETMAIN SP=241 (CSA) KEY 8
Rick Fochtman asked:
I'm trying to understand the differences between LOAD MODULES and
PROGRAM OBJECTS as they are stored in a PDS or PDSE.
Unfortunately the program object internal format is entirely OCO. I
don't know of anyone (outside IBM) who has found the secret decoder ring
for PDSE
Of course, if you want to compress to zero bits, just delete
the file and forget about getting back your data. eek!
Next time I accidently delete an important file, instead of saying I
deleting it, I can simply claim that I infinitely compressed it!
I once ran a third party defrag and ended up
Your question is very confusing.
Can an OMVS user submit a batch job? Yes, unless prevented by
the security system.
Can the batch job update SYS1.PARMLIB? Yes, unless prevented by
the security system.
What are you really trying to accomplish?
Most updates to PARMLIB
At 20:39 -0300 on 06/26/2006, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote about
Re: Western Digital Loses Class Action-Reply by July 15th f:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 06/26/2006
at 03:51 PM, Pommier, Rex R. [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
So let me see if I get this straight. Western Digital sold disk
drives
It's been a while since I visited the z/OS Unix forum.
Can any one give the the URL. Thanks.
-
Yahoo! Groups gets better. Check out the new email design. Plus theres much
more to come.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Rifkind
It's been a while since I visited the z/OS Unix forum.
Can any one give the the URL. Thanks.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-jc-
--
All
I need to make a change to our EDT to change the dev address that gets
allocated when I specify unit=TAPEBV
Currently address 19D gets allocated. I created a new IODF to allocate
dev address 199 when unit=TAPEBV is specified.
I have not changed it dynamically yet, but when I do is it
In a message dated 6/27/2006 2:52:15 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's been a while since I visited the z/OS Unix forum.
Same old place and same old name?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
MVS-OE
Withdrawn from marketing just means you can't buy a new 9037 from IBM
anymore. You can still buy them on the open market, if anyone has one for
sale. IBM will still support the 9037 until they announce that they won't
support it anymore. And then, you can still get 3rd party support. I know
T.Y.
Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Rifkind
It's been a while since I visited the z/OS Unix forum.
Can any one give the the URL. Thanks.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-jc-
It is my understanding that Perl for z/OS USS just GA on 6/16.
Does anyone have this installed already?
Duane
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Duane Weaver
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 3:17 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Perl for zOS USS?
It is my understanding that Perl for z/OS USS just GA on 6/16.
Does anyone
Hi Sorry for the late response. I have had your email forwarded and you
have been added to our mail list so your mail will no longer be rejected.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
James, no smoke. It is still announced only in preview mode, so no
deliverables yet.
Correct! No smoke! It's even less than that!
-
-teD
300,000 Kilometres per Second
Not only is it a good idea!
It's the LAW!!!
--
For
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 22:53:36 +0200, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Snip!
Another example would be USS. It can be ship, but it also means Unix
System Services. Even IBM uses this acronym in their documentation,
despite of shout made some folks.
USS is Unformatted System Services, and it has been
This might generate a whole new thread. We have used '--' for IODF suffix
for as long as generic specifications have been available. We chose '--'
because, in the event that the exact matching IODF cannot be found, we
figure that the 'most recent' IODF would give us the best chance of coming
It's in the ShopZ CATALOG as IBM Ported Tools for z/OS
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 3:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Perl for zOS USS?
-Original Message-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Marchant
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 4:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Western Digital Loses Class Action-Reply by July
15th for remedial action.
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:12:59 -0500, Dennis Trojak wrote:
It's in the ShopZ CATALOG as IBM Ported Tools for z/OS
That's (only) OpenSSH (FMID HOS1110). Find 5655-M23 IBM Ported Tools: Perl
z/OS (FMID HPRL110). I had to order a new license (nocharge).
Norbert Friemel
Skip Robinson wrote:
This might generate a whole new thread. We have used '--' for IODF suffix
for as long as generic specifications have been available. We chose '--'
because, in the event that the exact matching IODF cannot be found, we
figure that the 'most recent' IODF would give us the
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:16:37 -0400, Duane Weaver wrote:
It is my understanding that Perl for z/OS USS just GA on 6/16.
Does anyone have this installed already?
Installed: yes. Used/tested: no.
Norbert Friemel
--
For IBM-MAIN
In a recent note, Tom Marchant said:
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:11:03 -0500
USS is Unformatted System Services, and it has been documented in VTAM
manuals since long before Open Edition was announced. Why they decided
to change the name of Open Edition to Unix System Services is a
In a message dated 6/27/2006 3:28:45 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Sorry for the late response. I have had your email forwarded and you
have been added to our mail list so your mail will no longer be rejected
Don't think that's the problem. I forward a note
From: Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I thought program objects in the UNIX FS were very similar to
those in PDSE. How close? Can /bin/cp move between the two without
exploiting Binder?
They are close in that they support the same functions. However, /bin/cp
with the -x flag which is required
Hi,
I would like to set up a z/OS 1.6 PC that uses MVS-FTP as the application. I
do not want any device statements or any UNIX FTP. I would like to hard code
all the TCP JCL Procs so that the search order is known. Needless to say I
am having trouble. The documentation is very sketchy. The doc in
This command will extract files from a tar file, change CRLF to just CR,
and convert to EBCDIC:
pax -ofrom=iso8859-1,to=ibm-1047 -rqkf tarfile
All files in the tar file are assumed to be text files.
The 'q' in -rqkf is what causes the CRLF-to-CR conversion.
The 'k' prevents overwriting
Correction: That should be CRLF to LF.
Bill
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 22:38:52 -0500, Bill Godfrey wrote:
This command will extract files from a tar file, change CRLF to just CR,
and convert to EBCDIC:
pax -ofrom=iso8859-1,to=ibm-1047 -rqkf tarfile
All files in the tar file are assumed to be text
At 21:23 -0400 on 06/26/2006, Gerhard Postpischil wrote about Re:
Program Objects:
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
In a recent note, Rick Fochtman said:
as (possible) access to VSAM clusters of the indexed, sequential
and relative
I've learned that my compression algorithm can create
records
72 matches
Mail list logo
