Ed Jaffe wrote:
| Ed Gould wrote:
|
| | While your statement is true it would seem to me JES2 (JES3?) still
sends out source and as
| | long as it does then statement sequence numbers are needed. I vaguely
remember that IBM
| | at one time said they were going to stop sending out source for
At 13:14 -0600 on 07/28/2006, Paul Gilmartin wrote about Re: Data set
ENQueues and DEQueues in Jobs:
A JES3 partisan once told me, as I whined about a job spewing
ENQ messages into SYSLOG while another job held an ENQUE for
the same DSN on a different volume, That wouldn't happen with
JES3.
At 09:06 -0700 on 07/28/2006, Edward Jaffe wrote about Re: Data set
ENQueues and DEQueues in Jobs:
Staller, Allan wrote:
I am not familiar enough w/JES3 to make a useful comment.
The initiator (IEFIIC) is not a JES program! It does what it does
without regard to the type of job entry
john gilmore wrote:
Ted MacNeil WRITES:
REPEAT AFTER ME!
SMP is your friend!
SMP NEEDS statement numbers.
SMP certainly uses SNs and IEBUPDTE in some contexts. Equally, it
omits to use them in others where it could do so.
It never needs to use them, and it would be well if it had
Anne Lynn Wheeler wrote:
Google runs on hundreds of thousands of servers—by one estimate, in
excess of 450,000—racked up in thousands of clusters in dozens of data
centers around the world.
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2006n.html#12 Google Architecture
... in somewhat similar vein
Grid
No, port 6715 is free. The error I get is a return code of 38. Also,
Bind failed - retry with REUSEADDR option
Bind2 failed: rc=-1 errno=1115
JM202I TCP/IP may have failed or been recycled.
I can't find where these are documented. (Another problem - the
documentation
In a recent note, john gilmore said:
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 13:12:44 +
My favorite---storm warning of a big word to come---is their notional
usefulness in avoiding homoeoteleutera; but others may well have their own,
different favorites.
Congratulations!
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 07/29/2006
at 12:08 PM, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Since I noticed
ITYM perceived, inaccurately.
malice and badgering
PKB.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html
We don't care. We
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 07/29/2006
at 11:45 AM, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It just seems that some people can't take a hint,
PKB.
Schmeul,
I see that not only can't you read, you can't copy text accurately
either.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 07/28/2006
at 12:00 AM, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Even IBM calls it USS.
Sigh! Humor is such a subtle thing. Maybe I was too subtle for you.
Even IBM calls the user id UID. RS was being a hypocrite. Worse,
because IBM was using UID as an abbreviation for
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 07/30/2006
at 01:21 AM, john gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It never needs to use them,
How else would you package ++ APAR sysmods to only change the relevant
code? There are packaging issues if you want to be able to use SUP as
intended, without requiring a
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 07/29/2006
at 12:42 PM, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
AFAIK the sequence numbers are completely useless nowadays.
Then your knowledge doesn't go very far.
It was used for punched card sorter.
That hasn't been the important use for decades.
Is there any other
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 07/28/2006
at 03:50 PM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It appeared to me that the OP, perhaps using ISPF as the editor-
of-choice, was composing data to be exported as input to a desktop
program.
Indeed. And it might be appropriate in his specific case to drop
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
07/28/2006
at 05:16 PM, Wayne Driscoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
While that is true, since non-reentrent code loaded out of an APF
authorized library is loaded into KEY 8 storage, there is an
integrity exposure if said code is loaded into a multi-user address
space,
In a recent note, Robert A. Rosenberg said:
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 09:59:30 -0400
I have the impression that the initiator is also smart enough to
issue a ENQ TYPE=CHNG (to switch from ENQ=EXC to ENQ=SHR) if
I was unaware of such a facility. In fact:
Title: z/OS V1R7.0 MVS
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 09:08:00 -0300 Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
:07/28/2006
: at 05:16 PM, Wayne Driscoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
:While that is true, since non-reentrent code loaded out of an APF
:authorized library is loaded into KEY 8 storage,
In a message dated 7/30/2006 10:04:58 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Did you mean: homoioteleuton
More likely homoimaginus. Has anybody written a SHARE requirement for
SEQ/NOSEQ in IEASYS? It would probably be on the order of Y2K compliance.
Hello All,
What book will I find message IGD17040I Error. I have looked in every book I
can think of in bookmanager.
IGD101I SMS ALLOCATED TO DDNAME (ISPLST3 )
DSN (SYS06211.T001632.RA000.PEMLA0UL.R0138929)
STORCLAS (SCSTAND) MGMTCLAS () DATACLAS ()
Of my contention that Sequence Numbers (SNs) are obsolete, Edward Jeffe
writes:
| This is just not true! There is nothing obsolete about the use of sequence
numbers when creating | an SMP/E usermod. With this technology, it's
possible to write a modification to the behavior of a
| program
john gilmore wrote:
I am as aware as EJ is of the historical use that has been made of SNs
to maintain source programs, and I mentioned this role for them
explicitly in the post he comments upon. We differ about the
desirability of continuing to use them. So be it.
Don't misunderstand me!
At 7/30/2006 09:12 AM, John Gilmore wrote:
My favorite---storm warning of a big word to come---is their
notional usefulness in avoiding homoeoteleutera; but others may well
have their own, different favorites.
Google User: define: homoeoteleutera
Google (paraphrasing here): Huh?
Try the following link:
http://www.teradataforum.com/ibm_pdf/gc28-1788-15.pdf
Stephen Mednick
Computer Supervisory Services
Sydney, Australia
-Original Message-
What book will I find message IGD17040I Error. I have looked
in every book I can think of in bookmanager.
IGD101I
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:46:50 +1000, Shane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excuse my sceptocity, but such customers exist ???
Yup. Not like they did when I started in the 80s, but they do. Early this
year, I was presenting to a customer, and a colleague was asking some z/OS
trivia questions. There
Those of us that routinely work with MVS dynamic allocation have,
literally for decades, lamented the lack of an EQUated symbol to provide
the length of the S99RBX data structure. That structure was created back
in 1986 with the following change to macro IEFZB4D0.
$L1= SMSSTG2 JBB2223 860523
In a recent note, Edward Jaffe said:
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2006 15:04:01 -0700
Hallelujah!!! Happy days!! But ... wait! Was I prescient? The name I've
been assigning for 20 years to this user defined symbol is *exactly*
the same as that chosen by IBM for the official symbol. I now have
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Despite the dozens of errors, do you need to do anything more
than delete the single definition in your macro? It appears
that the definitions are equivalent.
The two definitions are indeed identical in every respect. The only
required change is to delete my symbol
HISTORIC RETURN CODE IS 196 DIAGNOSTIC INFORMATION IS 0C060090
For this code you need to look in the DFSMSdsp Diagnostic Reference.
You will find that, for CREATE, 0C060090 means
PDSE cannot be VIO.
--
Bruce Black
Senior Software Developer
Innovation Data Processing
I have the impression that the initiator is also smart enough to issue
a ENQ TYPE=CHNG (to switch from ENQ=EXC to ENQ=SHR) if subsequent
steps have the DSN as DISP=SHR after the last step that has it as
DISP=OLD (ie: Exclusive).
Sorry, ENQ RET=CHNG only changes a SHR ENQ to EXCL, not the other
==
-Original Message-
From: Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 7/30/2006 10:13 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: APF Authorized Code/Libraries.
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 09:08:00 -0300 Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
R.S. wrote:
Since I noticed that vast majority (or even all) of Shmuel's mails
contains only no, you're wrong or USS is not unix I stopped
responding him. I put his e-mail in kill-file, so his mails are
filtered. That's good: no more badgering. I don't loose anything
valuable, cause usually
Errno 1115 means that the address in already in use. I believe here it
means the port. You can find it in SYS1.MACLIB member BPXYERNO.
Is the 38 a return code or errno? I can find two 38's error number.
One means that the system (TCP/IP) is not ready.
The other means that a socket
but we would not do people's work for them; this explains his you are wrong
statements where you expect detailed information on what the error or
misunderstanding is. While his approach may seem
unreasonable, cold, and hurtful,
Insulting! Obnoxious!
A few pointers, rather than holier than
Nie będzie mnie w pracy od 2006-07-31 i nie wrócę przed 2006-08-09.
Odpowiem na wiadomości po powrocie.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
There are some interesting residencies coming up for those of you who'd
like to beef up skills, get deep experience before your own organization's
project, meet developers, and boost your resumes by becoming a published
author of an IBM redbook. IBM pays for your travel and living expenses.
Also,
34 matches
Mail list logo
