Re: where to fnd VTAM SYNAD & LERAD exit return code

Thanks a lot! I found the corresponding explaination. Best regards, He Ming (贺 明) Mobile: 1392-500-5956, 发件人： Chris Mason 发送时间： 2006-11-14 09:56:10 收件人： IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU 抄送： 主题： Re: where to fnd VTAM SYNAD & LERAD exit return code He Ming You will find VTAM codes in the manual z/OS V

Re: External Timer Source without STP on a Z9

Alan Altmark wrote: On Monday, 11/13/2006 at 08:02 CST, "McKown, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The zSeries TOD clock is only sync'ed to the HMC (or SE) clock with a Power On Restart (or is it RESET?), not at IPL time or LPAR activation time. A POR affects all LPARs, obviously. My informant

Re: where to fnd VTAM SYNAD & LERAD exit return code

He Ming You will find VTAM codes in the manual z/OS V1R8.0 Communications Server IP and SNA Codes (or whichever is appropriate for your release although the release probably doesn't matter): http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/F1A1D260/ The section to use is 2.2, "RPL RTNC

Re: hsm backup migrate un opened datasets

Jack, IIRC you must use DFDSS as your datamover to backup these datasets. Ed On Nov 13, 2006, at 3:28 PM, Jack Kelly wrote: Looked thru the archive and this is not discussed much. I want to migrate un-opened datasets (zero used space and *NONE* dsorg). I thought that PATCH .MCVT.+3D5 BI

where to fnd VTAM SYNAD & LERAD exit return code

In CICS message code: Messages that are generated because the VTAM SYNAD and LERAD exits have been entered are followed by VTAM RETURN CODE xxyy where xx is the VTAM recovery action return code and yy is the VTAM specific error return code, each obtained from fields of the RPL Could anybody te

Re: External Timer Source without STP on a Z9

Tim: Just curious about the offering. IBM seems to think (if I understand what is being offered correctly). That most mainframes are hooked up to the internet. While this may be true for some companies, I suspect it is not true for most. The sysplex timer (IMO) was a costly "feature" IMO

Re: 1401 & Music

http://www.cbttape.org/fun.htm Song of the S360-40 -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Warner Mach Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 3:00 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: 1401 & Music In the November issue of 'Wired' magazine

Re: Question JQES utilization

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 11/05/2006 at 12:25 PM, Ed Finnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >one of the DLIB packs where the new CHECKPTs lived. Putting operational data on a DLIB volume is tantamount to suicide. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see

Re: ARC0103I when adding STK VSM to virtual tape esoteric.

These are virtual tapes we are talking about. You can't mix device types in the same esoteric defined to HSM. I've run into issues at DR with 9840A / 9840B mixture. Do you know what CDR (configuration data) returns? I think ShowMVS and MXI can tell you. I don't know what your IBM VTS emulat

Re: PE not Sup'd

In a recent note, "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" said: > Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:50:56 -0500 > > There is, in general, no reason for the correcting PTF to supersede > the PTF in error. What it needs to supersede in the sysmod given as > the reason for the HOLD, normally the APAR for the PE.

Re: 1401 & Music

I remember on our 1410/1401 playing songs on the 1403 printer. There were little object decks, maybe 1/2 inch thick. The Battle Hymn of the Republic was a good song. Even the drums came through good. This was all done by printing certain patterns to get different sounds. A couple of the son

Re: ARC0103I when adding STK VSM to virtual tape esoteric.

The higher density cartridges are physically compatable with the two machines, But the data are recorded in an incompatable format. i.e. IBM cannot read STK and Vice-versa. I believe you will need more than on esoteric for this process. Try SETSYS USERUNITTABLE Currently most of our HSM work is

hsm backup migrate un opened datasets

Looked thru the archive and this is not discussed much. I want to migrate un-opened datasets (zero used space and *NONE* dsorg). I thought that PATCH .MCVT.+3D5 BITS(1...) would migrate empty datasets but it doesn't seem to do the job for me (at zos 1.7). I'm pretty sure that the problem

ARC0103I when adding STK VSM to virtual tape esoteric.

Currently most of our HSM work is going to an IBM virtual tape system. We are in the process of migrating off of IBM and going to STK. To get a jump on this we decided we would add the STK Virtual Tape drives to the Esoteric that's currently used by for the IBM VTS. When we did this HSM had

Re: SMP/E - module attributes issue

Shmuel, Too bad you missed most of this thread. Your suggestion for APPLY CHECK did not apply in this case. And Patrick did and does understand this stuff quite well. Don Imbriale -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz

Re: remote support questions - curiousity

>But it is bad for software developers to believe even slightly that hacking >can't happen to us. I can see denial of service (DOS) attacks being successful. But, I've never heard of one aimed at z/OS, or predessors. But, the memory protection scheme will stop most of the others. Also, with an

Re: Using indirect volume serial support

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 11/06/2006 at 09:31 PM, Mohamed Juma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >But to implement the two systems with two different VOLSER names, I >am thinking to use the indirect volume serial support, but I do not >know if it is the rigt view or not, as how I can do it. Yes. Use

Re: PE not Sup'd

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 11/06/2006 at 11:47 AM, "Joseph W. Beiter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >are there conditions where a pe'd ptf is not sup'd but instead marked >per by the correting ptf ? There is, in general, no reason for the correcting PTF to supersede the PTF in error. What it needs

Re: Printing prom ADCD.

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 11/05/2006 at 12:45 PM, Rubén López <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >I'm a newbie in Mainframe, and i can't find info about 3278 Printer >emulation over TCPIP. That's because the 3278 is a keyboard-display station, not a printer. Did you mean 3287? Google for TN3270E. Th

Re: SMP/E - module attributes issue

In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 11/09/2006 at 12:00 PM, "Patrick O'Keefe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >Ok. No tapes, but all the MCS statements were in the system PTS, >all the RELFILE files had built their PDSs, etc. All the data was >there. So I changed all RELFILE references to TXLIB reference

Re: Unix Security

On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 17:28:47 +0100, R.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >... >As you wrote it's because auditors want it. I understand your point, >however I'm curious whether there's any real reason. > I strongly agree with John on this. Even if no auditors were involved, giving a person UID(0)is

Re: Displaying ISPF Panels from a COBOL program

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Warren Ball > Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 2:38 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Displaying ISPF Panels from a COBOL program > > > Yes thanx, this appears to be the problem.

Re: Displaying ISPF Panels from a COBOL program

Yes thanx, this appears to be the problem. Evidently in the JCL I had to execute PGM=IKJEFT01, instead of my program and include a: //SYSTSIN DD * PROFILE PREFIX(MyHLQ) ISPSTART PGM(my program) But the issue now is that I get a 998 return code stating that on TBOPEN of ISPSPROF, the tabl

Re: Maximum DDStatements in a Job and/or Step

JCL Reference 255/step (IIRC) When in doubt. PANIC!! -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.

Re: 1401 & Music

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Halpern > Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 2:28 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: 1401 & Music > > > In the 1950s the SWAC computer had many kinds of songs. The > audio play

Re: 1401 & Music

In the 1950s the SWAC computer had many kinds of songs. The audio played thru a speaker that was coupled to various kinds of instruction (e.g. ADD). There were sounds characteristic of programs that gave clues when a program misbehaved. When the 1401 came in we wrote songs for the printer. -O

Re: Health Checker startup

Barbara, No, I didn't try that, I hadn't thought of it. It sounded like an interesting experiment, so I did - experiment, that is. I had wondered if it might bypass the search of the MSTJCL DD concatenations and instead locate the proc found in our private proclib, but it didn't. Thanks, Gr

Re: remote support questions - curiousity

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main as well. the other viewpoint was that the software was designed as dedicated, disconnected tabletop operation ... and allowed numerous applications (games, etc) to take over the whole machine. a l

Re: remote support questions - curiousity

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Brazee > Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 1:47 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: remote support questions - curiousity > > > On 13 Nov 2006 11:16:06 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: IBMLink and ETR

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Gray, Larry - Larry A > > On IBMLink under the List ETR options, didn't there use to be > a sort drop down box? Now that you mention it, I do recall there used to be one. Never noticed it is missing now -jc

Re: remote support questions - curiousity

On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:47:02 -0700, Howard Brazee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 13 Nov 2006 11:16:06 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom >Marchant) wrote: > >>Just as an example, why did Microsoft think it was a good idea >>that a document should contain executable code? Why would I want >>to run arbi

1401 & Music

In the November issue of 'Wired' magazine (pg 92) there is a short note titled, 'Composer Plays the Big Blues' ... Tells of composer Johann Johannsson from Iceland, whose father worked for IBM on the 1401. His father performed the popular hack of getting music out of the machine by placing a radio

Re: remote support questions - curiousity

On 13 Nov 2006 11:16:06 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Marchant) wrote: >Just as an example, why did Microsoft think it was a good idea >that a document should contain executable code? Why would I want >to run arbitrary code that you might include in a document that >you send me? Oh, it made lot

Re: IBMLink and ETR

Yes, if you check IBMLink News, you'll see that they implemented a new release over the weekend. Thankfully, they now allow you to tailor the AST and ETR lists so they can be sorted however you want, with whatever information you want, and the customization is remembered from session to sessio

Re: remote support questions - curiousity

On 13 Nov 2006 11:16:06 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Marchant) wrote: >>The biggest advantage to both the home consumer and to the hackers is >>that Windows is so popular - including most people who don't have safe >>computing practices. > >That's what Microsoft would have you believe. It sounds

IBMLink and ETR

NOTICE: All information in and attached to the e-mail(s) below may be proprietary, confidential, privileged and otherwise protected from improper or erroneous disclosure. If you are not the sender's intended recipient, you are not authorized to intercept, read, print, retain, copy, forward, or

Re: remote support questions - curiousity

On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:18:35 -0700, Howard Brazee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On 13 Nov 2006 09:20:43 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>windows PC than os/2 was. I find it at last practical to use from home, >>especially to logon to the SE's . >> >> >> >>so do the hackers > >The bigge

Re: remote support questions - curiousity

I believe our system is well protected with VPN and terminal services etc. I suppose if a hacker saw os2 it would make them give up Crispin Hugo Systems Programmer, Macro 4 Macro 4 plc, The Orangery, Turners Hill Road, Worth, Crawley, RH10 4SS Direct Line: +44 (0)1293 8721

Re: Friday fun - Discovery on the pad and the software's not done

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Phil Smith III) writes: > This is fairly OT, but the key graf is: > "When the shuttle's flight control software was developed in the > 1970s, NAS

Re: remote support questions - curiousity

On 13 Nov 2006 09:20:43 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >windows PC than os/2 was. I find it at last practical to use from home, >especially to logon to the SE's . > > > >>> >so do the hackers The biggest advantage to both the home consumer and to the hackers is that Windows is so popular -

Re: Friday fun - Discovery on the pad and the software's not done

When physicist Richard Feynman served on the Challenger investigation committee back in the late 80's, he kept notes, and wrote up his experiences in the book "What Do You Care What Other People Think?". The Challenger story fills about the last 1/3 of the book. Of all the Shuttle program groups h

Re: Friday fun - Discovery on the pad and the software's not done

On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 08:56:30 -0500, Phil Smith III <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >This is fairly OT, but the key graf is: >"When the shuttle's flight control software was developed in the 1970s, NASA managers did not envision the possibility of flying missions during the transition from one year to t

Re: Maximum DDStatements in a Job and/or Step

John P Kalinich wrote: The maximum number of DD statements per job step is 3273, based on the number of single DD statements allowed for a TIOT (task input output table) control block size of 64K. This limit can be different depending on the installation-defined TIOT size. The IBM-supplied defaul

Re: remote support questions - curiousity

In a message dated 11/13/2006 10:44:35 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: windows PC than os/2 was. I find it at last practical to use from home, especially to logon to the SE's . >> so do the hackers

Re: Maximum DDStatements in a Job and/or Step

Thank you. Regards, Herman Stocker avis budget group Phone:1973-496-4847 fax:1973-496-8201 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John P Kalinich Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 12:

Re: Maximum DDStatements in a Job and/or Step

The maximum number of DD statements per job step is 3273, based on the number of single DD statements allowed for a TIOT (task input output table) control block size of 64K. This limit can be different depending on the installation-defined TIOT size. The IBM-supplied default TIOT size is 32K. For i

Re: Maximum DDStatements in a Job and/or Step

guptae wrote: Hi , MAX. NO OF DD STATEMENTS IN A JOB:3273 MAXIMUM NUMBER OF STEPS IN A JOB=255 Taken from: http://www.ibmmainframes.com/post-52810.html Daniel McLaughlin Z-Series Systems Programmer Crawford & Company 4680 N. Royal Atlanta Tucker GA 30084 phone: 770-621-3256 fax: 770-6

Maximum DDStatements in a Job and/or Step

Good day, Where can I locate the Maximum number of DDStatements that can be in a job or step. Thank you. Regards, Herman Stocker avis budget group Phone:1973-496-4847 fax:1973-496-8201 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The sender believes that this E-mail and any attachments

Re: remote support questions - curiousity

It may not look so nice but I consider it much better for remote access from a windows PC than os/2 was. I find it at last practical to use from home, especially to logon to the SE's . Crispin Hugo Systems Programmer, Macro 4 http://www.macro4.com/ Macro 4 plc, The Orangery, Turners Hill Road,

Re: remote support questions - curiousity

Alan Altmark wrote: On Monday, 11/13/2006 at 05:07 CET, "R.S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It's Linux based, but I doubt you will like it. The operating system (formally IBM claims it's "closed system" - you cannot have even command line) is one animal, but the HMC application is another. It wo

Re: Assembler question

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tom Marchant) writes: > Macrocode was coded in assembler. It was very similar to millicode on > z/Architecture. re: http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/

Re: Unix Security

McKown, John wrote: -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.S. Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 9:58 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Unix Security IMHO the better idea is to have dadicated user fo BPXPRMxx SUPERUSER.

Re: External Timer Source without STP on a Z9

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark > Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 10:16 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: External Timer Source without STP on a Z9 > > > > My informant says otherwise: When y

Re: remote support questions - curiousity

On Monday, 11/13/2006 at 05:07 CET, "R.S." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's Linux based, but I doubt you will like it. > The operating system (formally IBM claims it's "closed system" - you > cannot have even command line) is one animal, but the HMC application is > another. It works almost the s

Re: External Timer Source without STP on a Z9

On Monday, 11/13/2006 at 08:02 CST, "McKown, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The zSeries TOD clock is only sync'ed to the HMC (or SE) clock with a > Power On Restart (or is it RESET?), not at IPL time or LPAR activation > time. A POR affects all LPARs, obviously. My informant says otherwise:

Re: Unix Security

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.S. > Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 9:58 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: Unix Security > > > IMHO the better idea is to have dadicated user fo BPXPRMxx > SUPERUSER. It

Re: remote support questions - curiousity

McKown, John wrote: -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 11:09 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: remote support questions - curiousity On Sunday, 11/12/2006 at 09:33 CST, "McKo

Re: Unix Security

McKown, John wrote: [...] If nothing else, grant RACF read authority to BPX.SUPERUSER in the FACILITY class to the people who need it. This will allow them to "su" for root (UID 0) access as needed. There are a lot of profiles starting with BPX. in the FACILITY class to allow people to do superus

Re: Assembler question

The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thompson, Steve , SCI TW) writes: > But as I said in a prior posting, ALC is a low level language. So > perhaps those of us that have programmed

Re: Assembler question

On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 09:47:26 -0500, Thompson, Steve (SCI TW) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... Macrocode at Amdahl was close >enough to the bare metal. Macrocode was coded in assembler. It was very similar to millicode on z/Architecture. -- Tom Marchant ---

Re: Unix Security

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Klavon John R > Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 8:56 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Unix Security > > > Does anyone have a good suggestion for setting up (Superuser > id or UID(

Unix Security

For a batch jobs, we use a SUBRROGATED user to gain UID(0) access. For online acces you can use FACILITY class from RACF o similar.. The intention is that the user msut do something specifically to obtain access, but not have it in his normal operation. angel luis domínguez bb

Re: Combine spool output datasets

On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 22:54:20 -0500, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: >Actually, that only applied to MFT-I. With MFT-II and MVT, R/I messages >were always in a separate data set than the JCL listing. > >Shmuel Metz , Seymour J. wrote: >> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 11/10/2006 >>at 06:46 PM

Unix Security

Does anyone have a good suggestion for setting up (Superuser id or UID(0) for individuals that require the access. They would like to set up as few users as possible to satisfy the auditors.. The information contained in this e-mail may be confidential and is intended solely for the use of the

Re: Health Checker startup

>-Original Message- >From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) >Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 12:47 PM >Given that HZSPROC defines and calls an instream proc named HZSPROC, >why are you surprised to receive the message PROCEDURE HZSPROC WAS >EXPANDED USING

Re: Assembler question

-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clark Morris Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 4:47 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: Assembler question On 7 Nov 2006 10:34:33 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: Back in the 1980's

Re: LLA question

> This is _almost_ like a dynamic LPA managed with removal by a LRU rule. > > Of course, if one were truly to provide a dynamic LLA, one would have > to distrust any soi-disant RENT load module and enforce loading it into > write-protected storage. But we just had that thread. If you avail yours

Re: LLA question

George, In fact the IBM documentation is not clear. When I implemented ISPF libraries under LLA control, to reduce BLDL times, I used information provided by the Cheryl Watson's tuning letter. See sample on the link below. http://www.watsonwalker.com/SEP92.PDF Regards, Morelatto --

Re: External Timer Source without STP on a Z9

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Neal > Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 7:58 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: External Timer Source without STP on a Z9 > > > Thank you, George. This makes more sense n

Re: External Timer Source without STP on a Z9

On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 11:17:53 +1100, George Kozakos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > To have an ETS for the mainframe you need STP functionality to gradually > steer the time.You can dial out to a modem but you still need STP. > Thank you, George. This makes more sense now. It sounds like there a

Re: External Timer Source without STP on a Z9

On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 07:35:02 -0600, Mark Neal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I am planning to install a small Z9 BC next month and I would like to have >an ETS for the mainframe. I do not need a Sysplex Timer or the STP >functions. > >It looks like NTP and GPS time sources are a Statement of Direc

Re: remote support questions - curiousity

No, it is Linux based. Bill Choate Emory University AAIT -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of McKown, John Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 8:33 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: remote support questions - curiousity > -O

Re: remote support questions - curiousity

> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark > Sent: Sunday, November 12, 2006 11:09 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: remote support questions - curiousity > > > On Sunday, 11/12/2006 at 09:33 CST, "McKown, J

Re: Alert: U.S. Daylight Savings Time Changes in 2007

In a recent note, Timothy Sipples said: > Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:44:31 +0900 > > You should monitor this Web site regularly to get the latest information: > > http://www.ibm.com/support/alerts/us > > You can send any love letters to the lame duck U.S. Congress. :-) > Don't forget to

Re: External Timer Source without STP on a Z9

On Mon, 2006-11-13 at 09:04 +0100, R.S. wrote: > [...] > Less less floor space/electricity/air condition ? > Timothy, c'mon! That's typical sales rep mantra ! > Probably you've seen 9037-2. It is in PC desktop size. Agree totally. Absolute piffle. Shane ... --

Re: IEFUTL wait time

If you have SDSF or equivalent product, you can look at the internal text for the job to see if the 1440 value of the time parameter was actually sent to the JCL converter. Otherwise, some local modification has intercepted it. The value 1440 should be in clear text with other JOB or EXEC statement

Re: IEFUTL wait time

This is not logical, TIME=1440 and TIME=NOLIMIT are identical, from JCL reference: "Also code TIME=1440 or TIME=NOLIMIT to specify that the system is to allow this step to remain in a continuous wait state for more than the installation time limit, which is established through SMF." So I still thi

Re: XRC Device Blocking - Where is it displayed in RMF?

FAO Anyone who's interested Just been told by IBM that XRC device blocking can be displayed in different places on different vendor hardware. IE HDS show device blocking in DISC time IBM ESS show it in IOSQ time. If using write pacing, then it's in DISC time for both HDS and IBM. Regards, JJ

SMF Browser

Currently I'm using WAS 4.0.1 for OS/390. I'm trying to find a tool to monitor WAS's performance. In Monitoring WebSphere Application Performance on z/OS (SG24-6825) redbook, it mentions that there's a free tool for WAS's SMF record (120). Its name is SMF Browser or Performance Summary Report f

Re: IEFUTL wait time

Are you 100% sure that you have no exits or ISV products in play here? TIME=1440 should cause the JWT to be ignored. What JES and SMF exits are active? Are you sure that the de-install of the "IEFUTL front-end product" has been performed correctly? Did this product just provide an IEFUTL exit -

Re: External Timer Source without STP on a Z9

Timothy Sipples wrote: Shane writes: Yep, I'd reckon it'd be a pretty hard sell for those (particularly small) shops that shelled out for redundant timers as recommended by IBM. The replacement would need to be real cheap. Every customer is different, but I believe the intent here is to simpli