Re: Issue MVS /CICS command from remote server or non-MVS environment ?

2007-06-07 Thread Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3)
>As the subject, would like to know if this is workable . - Setup FTP and allow the remote user to submit a job. The job can issue MVS commands directly thru JCL or via utility run from the JCL. - The utility might be some home written program to issue MVS commands from within batch jobs,

Re: CA-Allocate / SMS

2007-06-07 Thread John Ticic
-- snip -- With VAM (Since I AM a Silverback), you can use a DDNAME of VDSDIAGS to trace the allocation thru the selection routines. This helps to see why a dataset didn't go where (I thought) it should have. . . Does SMS have a similar DD? I've used the TEST facility in SMS, but find it w

PDS86 missing output with LIST subcommand

2007-06-07 Thread Anthony Fletcher
Has anyone experienced a problem with PDS86 leaving out a chunk of text from a LOAD module? I was looking in .SCEERUN(CEECCICS) to see what was in the CEEEXTAN CSECT. I used the LIST subcommand, and because it is quite big, the '0' subcommand, and did a FIND on CEEEXTAN. I didn't find it to my sur

Issue MVS /CICS command from remote server or non-MVS environment ?

2007-06-07 Thread Tsai Laurence
hello, As the subject, would like to know if this is workable . Sincerely, Laurence _ 在您的行動裝置上傳送接收 Hotmail 郵件,請移至: http://zh-asiasms.mobile.msn.com -- For IBM-

Re: explicity coding for STORCLAS & DATACLAS

2007-06-07 Thread Tommy Tsui
Hi all, After I checking the ACS, I found the problem, one of WHEN statement specify the following statement WHEN (&ANYVOL='' AND &STORCLAS = '') DO SET &STORCLAS='' EXIT END Therefore it bypassed, thanks all help.. many thanks --

Re: CA-Allocate / SMS

2007-06-07 Thread Knutson, Sam
Hi Bob, As far as I know this is not available in native DFSMSdfp but a small simple products from DTS Software SMS/Debug will do just what you want I think. http://www.dtssoftware.com/product_sms.htm Best Regards, Sam Knutson, GEICO System z Performan

IBM ties for second place in Storage - EMC wins

2007-06-07 Thread Ed Gould
http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/20070607/tc_pcworld/132665 IBM and HP tied for second place behind EMC in external storage sales for the first three months of 2007. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access

Re: mainframe = superserver

2007-06-07 Thread Ed Gould
On Jun 7, 2007, at 9:56 AM, Tom Moulder wrote: How soon we forget the lessons we have learned right here. This could not possible be done by anyone for fear of infringinig on Intel or someone's patents during the emulation! Why would we even think this? Especially since it would be IBM p

Re: mainframe = superserver

2007-06-07 Thread Anne & Lynn Wheeler
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main as well. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I realize that this has probably been asked before, but google didn't > give me an answer. Before I asked my question let me state that I > know that windows

Re: SHARE: JES2 Songbook

2007-06-07 Thread Rich Smrcina
Ray, When I looked in to this a couple of years ago I think a guest badge got you in to SCIDS and maybe the expo. Root around the registration page, I think it was $75. Ray Mullins wrote: OK, really dumb question: Even though it will sort of be in my backyard (well, 550 miles away), I won'

CA-Allocate / SMS

2007-06-07 Thread Lester, Bob
Hi All, We're in the process of converting off CA-Allocate (VAM to you Silverbacks) to SMS. With VAM (Since I AM a Silverback), you can use a DDNAME of VDSDIAGS to trace the allocation thru the selection routines. This helps to see why a dataset didn't go where (I thought) it should

Re: TSO LOGON Issue (resend with subject)

2007-06-07 Thread George, William (DHS-ITSD)
Resolved via clearing the RACF's COMMAND field in the TSO SEGMENT by a RACF super user. Thanks all. Bill -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George, William (DHS-ITSD) Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 3:04 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU

Re: IEBCOPY Unloaded dataset to PC and back again...not

2007-06-07 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 06:15:58 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: > >>QUOTE STRU R > >>also works with RECFM=U. > >FSVO works. When you FTP to the PC you lose your record boundaries >and there's no equivalent to an RDW. > I tried a small test case. The record boundaries were preserved (according

Re: mainframe = superserver

2007-06-07 Thread Neil Duffee
On 2007-06-05 22:05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote concerning "mainframe = superserver" to IBM-Main: > [snip] Is there a medium to large IBM box that can run a couple > hundred of virtual windows 2003 servers? And said box can scale up to > approximately 1000+ virtual windows servers? [snip] > >

Re: Enterprise Cobol XML Parser

2007-06-07 Thread Steve Comstock
Ward, Mike S wrote: Hello all, I tried the archives but didn't find what I was looking for. We have z/os 1.7 and Enterprise Cobol 3.4.0. It has a built in XML parser, but I'm having a little trouble understanding how to use it. Would anyone by chance have a sample program that shows how to correl

Enterprise Cobol XML Parser

2007-06-07 Thread Ward, Mike S
Hello all, I tried the archives but didn't find what I was looking for. We have z/os 1.7 and Enterprise Cobol 3.4.0. It has a built in XML parser, but I'm having a little trouble understanding how to use it. Would anyone by chance have a sample program that shows how to correlate the elements in th

LISTCAT RBA UPDATE

2007-06-07 Thread Jorge Arueira Campos
Hi All In Z/os 1.7 in command LISTCAT after REPRO to load a some records in VSAM DATASET the information in catalog about allocate and used RBA not update. Anybody know about a problem or APAR ??? Thanks Jorge Arueira Campos POLITEC-CEF SP BRAZIL ---

Re: IEBCOPY Unloaded dataset to PC and back again...not

2007-06-07 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 06/06/2007 at 08:00 AM, "McKown, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >QUOTE STRU R >also works with RECFM=U. FSVO works. When you FTP to the PC you lose your record boundaries and there's no equivalent to an RDW. >But it is still impossible to transfer load modules /

Re: IEBCOPY Unloaded dataset to PC and back again...not

2007-06-07 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 06/06/2007 at 10:16 AM, Richard Peurifoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >The only thing missing is the directory info. If you relink the >transfered module specify the correct AMODE, RMODE, ENTRY, etc it >should work. Only if you first manually deblock the transferred fil

Re: IEBCOPY Unloaded dataset to PC and back again...not successful

2007-06-07 Thread Kenneth E Tomiak
IND$FILE lacks the options to do this. FTP requires the right parameters on the downlaod and the upload. - use ISPF to get the original DCB and space information for both the PDS and the sequential backup as you may need them later. To download: ftp> bin 200 Representation type is Image ftp> qu

Re: mainframe = superserver

2007-06-07 Thread Andy Wood
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 12:37:37 -0500, McKown, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: . . . > >Some instructions on the zSeries are patent protected. That means that >writing any code or making any hardware which has an identical effect, >regardless of how it is done, can only be legally done if the >perso

Re: SHARE: JES2 Songbook

2007-06-07 Thread Ray Mullins
OK, really dumb question: Even though it will sort of be in my backyard (well, 550 miles away), I won't be able to be a badge holder at SHARE for various reasons. But I probably can get away that week to Sandy Eggo. To attend SCIDS, do I have to be attending SHARE (i.e., have a paid admission)?

Re: How do i install Linux on S/390 Machine

2007-06-07 Thread Dave Kopischke
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 17:06:54 -0400, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote: >There is a PDF for session 2814, which was (I think) the same presentation >with a different number (happens a lot at SHARE when projects present >sessions jointly). > >Sign onto share.org with your ID, then paste this into your brows

Re: How do i install Linux on S/390 Machine

2007-06-07 Thread Farley, Peter x23353
> -Original Message- > From: Dave Kopischke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 4:33 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: How do i install Linux on S/390 Machine > > On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 16:04:58 -0400, Bob Shannon wrote: > > >The presentations from the most re

Re: How do i install Linux on S/390 Machine

2007-06-07 Thread Bob Shannon
>Where do I find the session slides to view or download and print ??? There should be a paperclip icon next to the abstract. If there is, click the session name and you should reach a download screen. If there is no paperclip there is no presentation. Sometimes speakers don't submit the presenta

Re: How do i install Linux on S/390 Machine

2007-06-07 Thread Dave Kopischke
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 16:40:26 -0400, Imbriale, Donald wrote: >If the presenter made them available, they should be accessible from the >SHARE web site. In this case, it appears that no slides/presentation >material was made available for download. > It sounds like this was an ongoing presentation

Re: How do i install Linux on S/390 Machine

2007-06-07 Thread Imbriale, Donald
If the presenter made them available, they should be accessible from the SHARE web site. In this case, it appears that no slides/presentation material was made available for download. Don Imbriale -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf

Re: How do i install Linux on S/390 Machine

2007-06-07 Thread Mueller, David
I am aware of one session like that from the recent Tampa conference - the presenter did not provide the conference staff with a copy of the presentation that could be loaded up for that type of availability. David Mueller | Systems Programmer | DMS/EITS Phone: 850-414-9134 (Rm 107 SRC) | Fax: 850

Re: How do i install Linux on S/390 Machine

2007-06-07 Thread Dave Kopischke
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 16:04:58 -0400, Bob Shannon wrote: >The presentations from the most recent SHARE are available to everyone >on the SHARE website. The older presentations are available online to >members only. Go to www.share.org and request an Id and password. > I already have an ID. I signed

Re: How do i install Linux on S/390 Machine

2007-06-07 Thread Bob Shannon
>I am a member, but it took a while to find this. I finally >found "9314 - Linux in an LPAR - Here's How It's Done" from >the Washington SHARE. I don't see a way to view the presentation >though. It looks like you can buy a CD or DVD with everything >on it, but I just want to see this one prese

Re: explicity coding for STORCLAS & DATACLAS

2007-06-07 Thread Bruce Black
Tommy, the storagegroup ACS routine is not called unless a storage class is assigned to the dataset. You need to check your storageclass ACS to see what it does when a STORCLAS is explicitly assigned by the user (it will be the initial value of &STORCLAS in that ACS routine. -- Bruce A. Black

Re: How do i install Linux on S/390 Machine

2007-06-07 Thread Dave Kopischke
On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 16:35:26 -0500, Kenneth E Tomiak wrote: >>9314 - Linux in an LPAR - Here's How It's Done, since i do not have access >>to SHARE I'm unable to look at it further. >> I am a member, but it took a while to find this. I finally found "9314 - Linux in an LPAR - Here's How It's Don

Re: mainframe = superserver

2007-06-07 Thread Schramm, Rob
It was Bristol. I remember something about them doing the port maybe to run under VM. -Rob This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive this e-mail in error, please do not rea

Re: Where is storage taken for System Trace Table?

2007-06-07 Thread Schramm, Rob
Jim, Thanks for the additional information. I had opened an ETR with IBM about it and have asked that it be documented. -Rob Schramm This e-mail transmission contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. It is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. If you receive

Re: mainframe = superserver

2007-06-07 Thread Schramm, Rob
I am almost positive that I remember the project. Some vendor that began with a "b" or "v" was doing the port. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craddock, Chris Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 9:23 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU S

Re: mainframe = superserver

2007-06-07 Thread Howard Brazee
On 7 Jun 2007 10:37:53 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (McKown, John) wrote: >Some instructions on the zSeries are patent protected. That means that >writing any code or making any hardware which has an identical effect, >regardless of how it is done, can only be legally done if the >person/company doing

Re: mainframe = superserver

2007-06-07 Thread Tom Moulder
<< snip >> Some instructions on the zSeries are patent protected. That means that writing any code or making any hardware which has an identical effect, regardless of how it is done, can only be legally done if the person/company doing the emulation has a patent license. The point is that Intel ma

Re: mainframe = superserver

2007-06-07 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Jacobs > Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 11:27 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: mainframe = superserver > > > Tom Moulder wrote: > > Mark > > > > Think of all the legal rami

Re: z/OS Documentation? Ouch!

2007-06-07 Thread Jack Kelly
Now that Paul has opened the subject of IBM doc'm, how about getting STK/SUN/STC to do something with their, I guess that you would call it, documentation? Who is the division head that we can write to? And let's not go into syntax that can wait until we get some documentation first! Iceberg wa

Re: mainframe = superserver

2007-06-07 Thread Tom Moulder
<< snip >> To pick up on Tom Moulder: I'm not aware of _ANY_ involvement of FLEX or Fundamental Software in the _IBM_ versus _PSI_ lawsuit. Indeed, I've commented several times on the deafening silence from Fremont (and Ann Arbor). << unsnip >> I did not mean to imply any involvement of FLEX in

Re: PDSe Program Objects vs PDS Load Modules

2007-06-07 Thread R.S.
I think nobody mentioned the following: PDS can contain LM members and "data" members - both at a time, Data members mean members which are in RECFM=U format, but not being programs, i.e. copied using IEBGENER. PDSE can contain PO or data exclusively. A mix of POs and data members is not allo

Re: Help with UNIX abend

2007-06-07 Thread Hunkeler Peter (KIUK 3)
>I was looking for something for my end users that would not take a lot of >effort. > >Lizette > >>TSO EXEC 'SYS1.SBPXEXEC(BPXMTEXT)' '0B0C00FC' Also available as shell command (lower case: bpxmtext) Peter Hunkeler -- For IB

mainframe = superserver

2007-06-07 Thread Phil Payne
Sorry - no zSeries content. The idea of an IBM platform acting as a consolidation target for n x 100 Windows servers is not new, nor is it IBM's. Perhaps a little more than a decade ago, Microsoft (and perhaps involving billg in person) realized that a very small but not ignorable fraction of t

Re: mainframe = superserver

2007-06-07 Thread Mark Jacobs
Tom Moulder wrote: Mark Think of all the legal ramifications. Something might could be done, but would there be law suits that followed and attorneys who found their pockets lined with money? It might not work worth spit as CC so eloquently put it, but the lawyers would have a field day as we

Re: mainframe = superserver

2007-06-07 Thread Thompson, Steve
-Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Mason Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 10:13 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: mainframe = superserver Kees Didn't IBM wait until there was a clear definition of what a system that clai

Re: PDSe Program Objects vs PDS Load Modules

2007-06-07 Thread GAVIN Darren * OPS EAS
A PDSE Program Object allows to use of DLL linkage (DLL Cobol Compiles) context instead of standard, without special handling during the link edit steps. It also supports OOCobol operation modes natively. A DLL mode program object is always dynamically linked, however it allows one to function pa

Re: Annd yet more pedantry( was: USS pedantry (was Friday musings on the future of 3270 applications)

2007-06-07 Thread R.S.
Patrick O'Keefe wrote: On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 22:17:09 +0200, R.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ...>What is *primary* meaning of USS acronym ? Well, it depends. For you and S.Metz it is always Unformatted System Services. ... I also agree with "S.Metz" that USS is an abreviation, not an acro

Re: REPRO MERGECAT

2007-06-07 Thread Traylor, Terry
Hello Willie, The delete/define can take place before or after. The latter is recommended just in case the repro/mergcat has issues. Its best to make sure the datasets associated with the lever are not in use at the time. It would be even better to lock the catalog before and unlock when the mer

Re: Where is storage taken for System Trace Table?

2007-06-07 Thread (IBM Mainframe Discussion List)
In a message dated 6/7/2007 2:27:38 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Trace interrupt processing simply changes CR 12 to point to the beginning of the next buffer for that CPU. There is no copying done at this point. Ah, that makes more sense that my guess as to how

Re: mainframe = superserver

2007-06-07 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Mason > Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 10:13 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: mainframe = superserver > > > Kees > > > Now, please direct us to the equivalent stateme

Re: mainframe = superserver

2007-06-07 Thread Chris Mason
Kees Didn't IBM wait until there was a clear definition of what a system that claimed to be a "UNIX" system did before implementing it? - and then discovered - as I remember a colleague crowing in the corridor - that it was the only *true* "UNIX", all other pretenders being deficient in some way

REPRO MERGECAT

2007-06-07 Thread willie bunter
Good Day To all, I will be performing a catalog clean up. I will be doing a REPRO MERGECAT. My question is will that process delete the alias or do I need to delete the alias before I redefine it? Below is my jcl: //MERGECAT EXEC PGM=IDCAMS,REGION=4M,TIME=1440,COND=(0,NE) //*

Re: mainframe = superserver

2007-06-07 Thread Tom Moulder
Mark Think of all the legal ramifications. Something might could be done, but would there be law suits that followed and attorneys who found their pockets lined with money? It might not work worth spit as CC so eloquently put it, but the lawyers would have a field day as we are seeing right now

Re: mainframe = superserver

2007-06-07 Thread Mark Jacobs
Ed Finnell wrote: In a message dated 6/7/2007 1:22:12 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Or that someone could write an intel emulator that would allow windows to run on zSeries? Might be absurd, but not impossible. If someone could write a S/390 emulator (example H

Re: mainframe = superserver

2007-06-07 Thread Tom Moulder
How soon we forget the lessons we have learned right here. This could not possible be done by anyone for fear of infringinig on Intel or someone's patents during the emulation! Why would we even think this? Especially since it would be IBM providing the emulation! Tom Moulder -Original Me

Re: PDSe Program Objects vs PDS Load Modules

2007-06-07 Thread Steve Comstock
Jeffrey Deaver wrote: OK. So I've recently been introduced to the fact that when you copy a load module from a PDS to a PDSe with IEBCOPY, it magically becomes a Project Object. I've been reading what I can find and it seems that operation is ok, but that moving the other way... PDSe PO to a PD

Re: c89 problem w/ irrhfsu

2007-06-07 Thread Bonno, Tuco
This did it; thanks to all who responded, on and off list. -Original Message- From: MVS OpenEdition [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Staller, Allan Sent: Thursday, 07 June, 2007 10:11 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: c89 problem w/ irrhfsu Add a region of at least 128M to your lo

Re: PDSe Program Objects vs PDS Load Modules

2007-06-07 Thread Mark Jacobs
Jeffrey Deaver wrote: OK. So I've recently been introduced to the fact that when you copy a load module from a PDS to a PDSe with IEBCOPY, it magically becomes a Project Object. I've been reading what I can find and it seems that operation is ok, but that moving the other way... PDSe PO to a PD

Re: PDSe Program Objects vs PDS Load Modules

2007-06-07 Thread Jeffrey Deaver
Doh! Read PROGRAM Object where it says Project Object. jeez... Jeffrey Deaver, Engineer Systems Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED] 651-665-4231(v) 651-610-7670(p) -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, se

PDSe Program Objects vs PDS Load Modules

2007-06-07 Thread Jeffrey Deaver
OK. So I've recently been introduced to the fact that when you copy a load module from a PDS to a PDSe with IEBCOPY, it magically becomes a Project Object. I've been reading what I can find and it seems that operation is ok, but that moving the other way... PDSe PO to a PDS LM is a no no since th

Re: c89 problem w/ irrhfsu

2007-06-07 Thread Steve Comstock
Bonno, Tuco wrote: << cross-posted to ibm-main, mvs-oe listservers : looking for help wherever i can find it . >> environment here is z/os 1.7, pretty much vanilla as it came out of a serverpack, running in a test lpar, my personal sandbox, i.e., not much going on there unless i'm the one

Re: FILE SYS KERNEL WAIT

2007-06-07 Thread Paul Whelan
Thank you for the explanation John. Kind of fits in with the 'everything is a file' concept in UNIX I guess. Regards Paul -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with th

Re: Is Parallel Programming Just Too Hard?

2007-06-07 Thread Anne & Lynn Wheeler
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shane) writes: > M - seems to be just a "warming over" of the multi-programming > versus parallel discussion. > With the exception of that la

Re: mainframe = superserver

2007-06-07 Thread Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > In a message dated 6/7/2007 1:22:12 A.M. Central Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Or that someone could write an intel emulator that would allow windows to > run on zSeries? > Might be absurd, but not imposs

Re: SHARE: JES2 Songbook

2007-06-07 Thread Ed Finnell
In a message dated 6/7/2007 8:47:49 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You are correct :) I really need to get to a SHARE conference some day!!! >> If you're musical(or not) it's on file 33 of CBTTAPE.org Some of them are cleverer than others, some just downright pai

c89 problem w/ irrhfsu

2007-06-07 Thread Bonno, Tuco
<< cross-posted to ibm-main, mvs-oe listservers : looking for help wherever i can find it . >> environment here is z/os 1.7, pretty much vanilla as it came out of a serverpack, running in a test lpar, my personal sandbox, i.e., not much going on there unless i'm the one doing it. i've got a

Re: SHARE: JES2 Songbook

2007-06-07 Thread Dave Butts
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 07:38:52 -0500, Mark H. Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >You lead a sheltered life Dave. Sorry, couldn't resist. You are correct :) I really need to get to a SHARE conference some day!!! -- For IBM-MAIN s

Re: mainframe = superserver

2007-06-07 Thread Ed Finnell
In a message dated 6/7/2007 1:22:12 A.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Or that someone could write an intel emulator that would allow windows to run on zSeries? Might be absurd, but not impossible. >> Yeah the bright folks at UCLA have had X/PL(and it's successors) for

Re: FILE SYS KERNEL WAIT

2007-06-07 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Whelan > Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 7:52 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: FILE SYS KERNEL WAIT > > > Greetings to all, > > Hopefully someone can help me out with a questio

Re: mainframe = superserver

2007-06-07 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craddock, Chris > Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 9:06 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: mainframe = superserver > > > > What is not possible, that it was IBM or Amdahl did it? >

Re: IEBCOPY Unloaded dataset to PC and back again...not

2007-06-07 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kenneth E Tomiak > Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 8:24 PM > To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU > Subject: Re: IEBCOPY Unloaded dataset to PC and back again...not > > > Not on my Windows/XP system. I

Re: Help with UNIX abend

2007-06-07 Thread Lizette Koehler
Thanks Mark Zelden. This was what I needed, BPXMTEXT. I had downloaded the perr tool from the Unix tools section of IBM but it was not perfect. I was looking for something for my end users that would not take a lot of effort. Lizette >TSO EXEC 'SYS1.SBPXEXEC(BPXMTEXT)' '0B0C00FC'

Re: Is Parallel Programming Just Too Hard?

2007-06-07 Thread Shane
On Wed, 2007-06-06 at 08:16 -0600, Anne & Lynn Wheeler wrote: > a couple recent items: > > The death of single threaded development > http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=519 > Google Acquires Multicore Programming Startup PeakStream -- > Multithreaded Programming > http://www.informationweek.com/news/sh

FILE SYS KERNEL WAIT

2007-06-07 Thread Paul Whelan
Greetings to all, Hopefully someone can help me out with a question regarding z/OS Unix. Whilst monitoring the processes we have running in z/OS Unix (z/OS 1.7) using the PS panel in SDSF we see, amongst others, a status of FILE SYS KERNEL WAIT. Whilst the actual meaning appears fairly obvious.

Re: SHARE: JES2 Songbook

2007-06-07 Thread Mark H. Young
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 07:38:52 -0500, Mark H. Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 07:27:19 -0500, Dave Butts ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>I'm sure most people here know this answer already, but I am curious. >>What is the JES2 songbook? >> >>Thanks, >>Dave >> > >You lead a shelte

ESS Storage Upgrade ...

2007-06-07 Thread Moussadak Mostafa
Hi folks, We have a 2105 ESS 800 configured with 8 LSS (00 to 07) with 128 devices each. The physical devices, 12 Eightpacks of 18.2Go disques, are assigned this way : LSS (00 to 03) with 72 volumes emulated 3390-3 LSS (04 to 07) with 36 volumes emulated 3390-3 At this time, we want to upgrad

Re: SHARE: JES2 Songbook

2007-06-07 Thread Mark H. Young
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 07:27:19 -0500, Dave Butts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I'm sure most people here know this answer already, but I am curious. >What is the JES2 songbook? > >Thanks, >Dave > You lead a sheltered life Dave. Sorry, couldn't resist. For us greybeards or silvertones, etc. it's the

Re: SHARE: JES2 Songbook

2007-06-07 Thread Dave Butts
I'm sure most people here know this answer already, but I am curious. What is the JES2 songbook? Thanks, Dave -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GE

Batch COBOL ODBC HEWL ERROR

2007-06-07 Thread Timothy Smith
Greetings! I am trying to write a COBOL batch program that will SELECT data from an ODBC DSN defined on the mainframe (the data source itself is also on the mainframe). My Link edit fails with unresolved symbols and I was wondering if anyone might know what library or libraries I'm missing? Ha

Re: explicity coding for STORCLAS & DATACLAS

2007-06-07 Thread Tom Marchant
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 18:30:51 +0800, Tommy Tsui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hi all, >Thanks all of your kind information and advice. what I try to do is that >1) in JCL if no storage class and dataclass code then all datasets will >allocate to non-sms managed volume or work pack. Are you sure that

Re: explicity coding for STORCLAS & DATACLAS

2007-06-07 Thread Richards.Bob
Tommy, Post the data class and storage class routines or email them to me and I'll help you figure out what is going on. Bob Richards -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tommy Tsui Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2007 6:31 AM To: IBM-M

explicity coding for STORCLAS & DATACLAS

2007-06-07 Thread Tommy Tsui
Hi all, Thanks all of your kind information and advice. what I try to do is that 1) in JCL if no storage class and dataclass code then all datasets will allocate to non-sms managed volume or work pack. 2) If JCL code the STORCLAS & DATACLAS then all datasets will allocate to sms-managed volume In

Re: mainframe = superserver

2007-06-07 Thread Phil Smith III
"Craddock, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sorry, my rant was not clear. Operating systems in particular have >pretty significant dependencies on the instruction set architecture. It >is just impossible to run a Microsoft Windows operating system (binary) >on anything that isn't a faithful implementati